Comparison of skin adhesive and absorbable intracutaneous suture for the implantation of cardiac rhythm devices

[Surgical basics of cardiac implantable electronic device implantation from skin incision through closure]

Implantation of pacemakers is generally considered a "minor intervention". Younger colleagues obtain their skills from experienced ones; ideally not just over the course of one or two interventions under surveillance but until a certain level of confidence is achieved. In Germany, certification is still optional. The German Cardiology Society (DSC, "Deutsche Gesellschaft für Kardiologie") provides expertise courses to obtain basic knowledge of pacemaker therapy; the GCS/GSCVS has been offering certification modules since 2013 to acquire fundamental knowledge from experts and basic technical skills by simulator training. The present article illustrates the major aspects of pacemaker implantation procedures and some avoidable pitfalls.

The Neurostimulation Appropriateness Consensus Committee (NACC): Recommendations for Surgical Technique for Spinal Cord Stimulation

INTRODUCTION

The field of neurostimulation for the treatment of chronic pain is a rapidly developing area of medicine. Although neurostimulation therapies have advanced significantly as a result of technologic improvements, surgical planning, device placement, and postoperative care are of equal importance to optimize outcomes. This Neurostimulation Appropriateness Consensus Committee (NACC) project intends to provide evidence-based guidance for these often-overlooked areas of neurostimulation practice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Authors were chosen based on their clinical expertise, familiarity with the peer-reviewed literature, research productivity, and contributions to the neuromodulation literature. Section leaders supervised literature searches of MEDLINE, BioMed Central, Current Contents Connect, Embase, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and PubMed from the last NACC publication in 2017 to the present. Identified studies were graded using the United States Preventive Services Task Force criteria for evidence and certainty of net benefit. Recommendations are based on evidence strength and consensus when evidence was scant.

RESULTS

This NACC project provides guidance on preoperative assessment, intraoperative techniques, and postoperative management in the form of consensus points with supportive evidence. These results are based on grade of evidence, strength of consensus, and expert opinion.

CONCLUSIONS

The NACC has given guidance for a surgical plan that encompasses the patient journey from the planning stage through the surgical experience and postoperative care. The overall recommendations are designed to improve efficacy and the safety of patients undergoing these neuromodulation procedures and are intended to apply throughout the international community.

Wound Closure After Port Implantation-a Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Tissue Adhesive and Intracutaneous Suturing

BACKGROUND

Wound healing after pectoral port implantation is a major factor determining the success or failure of the procedure. Infection and wound dehiscence can endanger the functionality of the port system and impede chemotherapy. The cosmetic result is important for patient satisfaction as well.

METHODS

From August 2015 to July 2017, adult patients with an indication for port implantation were entered into a prospective, randomized and controlled single-center study. The skin incision was closed either with tissue adhesive or with an intracutaneous suture. The primary endpoints were the total score of the scar evaluated by the patient and the investigator on the POSAS scale (Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale: 6 [normal skin] to 60 points), blinded assessment of photographic documentation by ten evaluating physicians, and the patient's reported quality of life. The calculation of case numbers was based only on the patients' overall POSAS assessment, which was tested for non-inferiority. The secondary endpoints were other complications (infection, dehiscence) and the duration of wound closure (trial registration number NCT02551510).

RESULTS

156 patients (60 ± 13 years, 64% women) participated in the study. The patientassessed total POSAS score of tissue adhesive revealed non-inferiority to suturing (adhesive 11.7 ± 5.8 vs. suture 10.1 ± 4.0, p for non-inferiority <0.001). Both the investigators in their POSAS assessments and the blinded physician evaluators in their assessment of photographically documented wounds rated wound closure by suturing better than closure with tissue adhesive. No significant differences were found between groups with respect to quality of life or the frequency of wound infection or dehiscence.

CONCLUSION

Closure of the upper cutaneous layer with tissue adhesive is a suitable and safe method of wound closure after port implantation.

Outcomes of intracutaneous sutures in comparison with intracutaneous staples in cardiac implantable-electronic device pocket closure

OBJECTIVE

With the increase in cardiovascular implantable-electronic devices (CIEDs), complications from insertion and healing are also increasing. Therefore, the objective of this study was to compare the intracutaneous stapling method to the absorbable suture technique in terms of complications, procedure time, and pocket closure time.

METHODS

An observational study was conducted over the course of three months on patients with CIED implantation. The patients were divided in two groups according to pocket closure technique. Group 1 included patients with pocket closure using intracutaneous sutures; whereas in Group 2, the pocket was closed by intracutaneous staples. Data were collected regarding patient characteristics and wound problems. The endpoints were wound problems, including early and late wound problems (primary), total procedure time, and the time taken for pocket closure (secondary).

RESULTS

One hundred and nineteen patients and 107 patients were allocated to Group 1 and Group 2, respectively. During the three-month observation period, 27 (22.6%) patients in Group 1 and 13 (12.1%) patients in Group 2 suffered from early wound problems, and the combined primary endpoint reached was statistically significant (p=0.021). Minor and major bleeding events were more common in Group 1 [Odds ratio (OR): 4.49, p=0.024; OR: 0.96, p=0.052]. The time to close the pocket was markedly reduced in Group 2 (7.29±1.42 vs. 3.98±1.19, p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

The rate of early wound problems is higher using intracutaneous sutures; and therefore, intracutaneous staples should be preferred to prevent these problems.

EHRA expert consensus statement and practical guide on optimal implantation technique for conventional pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), and the Latin-American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS)

With the global increase in device implantations, there is a growing need to train physicians to implant pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. Although there are international recommendations for device indications and programming, there is no consensus to date regarding implantation technique. This document is founded on a systematic literature search and review, and on consensus from an international task force. It aims to fill the gap by setting standards for device implantation.

Cardiac device implant wound closure with a novel low-density suture spacing single layer method

BACKGROUND

To establish a novel time-saving and safe suture method for cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation.

METHODS

From January 2017 to April 2020, a total of 1317 patients scheduled for CIED procedure were consecutively enrolled in this study. Wound closure of all patients were prospectively assigned either to low-density suture spacing single layer suture group (single-layer group) or traditional two layer suture group (two-layer group). The effects of two closure methods on wound healing and pocket related complications were compared.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in age, gender, BMI, comorbid diseases (diabetes, hypertension, coronary heart disease, and chronic kidney disease), and antiplatelet or anticoagulant drug use between the two groups. The number of suture stitches in the single-layer group was significantly less than that in the two-layer group [3.03(3-4) vs. 7.17(7-10), p < .001], the suture time in the single-layer group was significantly shorter than that in the two-layer group [190.57(167-256) s vs. 493.36(452-655) s, p < .001], and the incidence of clinically significant hematoma in the single-layer group was comparable to that in the two-layer group (0.7% vs. 0.3%, p = .742). Additionally, there were no significant differences in the incidence of pocket infection, dehiscence and keloid between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Novel single-layer suture with low-density suture spacing is feasible and associated with a low incidence of wound dehiscence or infection for CIED implantation.

Bioresorbable Electronic Implants: History, Materials, Fabrication, Devices, and Clinical Applications

Medical implants, either passive implants for structural support or implantable devices with active electronics, have been widely used for the diagnosis and treatment of various diseases and clinical issues. These implants offer various functions, including mechanical support of biological structures in orthopedic and dental applications, continuous electrophysiological monitoring and feedback of electrical stimulation in neuronal and cardiac applications, and controlled drug delivery while maintaining arterial structure in drug-eluting stents. Although these implants exhibit long-term biocompatibility, surgery for their retrieval is often required, which imposes physical, biological, and economical burdens on the patients. Therefore, as an alternative to such secondary surgeries, bioresorbable implants that disappear after a certain period of time inside the body, including bioresorbable active electronics, have been highlighted recently. This review first discusses the historical background of medical implants and briefly define related terminology. Representative examples of non-degradable medical implants for passive structural support and/or for diagnosis and therapy with active electronics are also provided. Then, recent progress in bioresorbable active implants composed of biosignal sensors, actuators for therapeutics, wireless power supply components, and their integrated systems are reviewed. Finally, clinical applications of these bioresorbable electronic implants are exemplified with brief conclusion and future outlook.

Noninvasive tissue adhesive for cardiac implantable electronic device pocket closure: the TAPE pilot study

PURPOSE

Device infection is a serious complication of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED). Ensuring complete pocket closure can be time consuming, but remains vital to prevent infection. The Zip® Surgical Skin Closure (ZIP) is a noninvasive adhesive device applied to the skin as an alternative to subcuticular sutures for skin closure. We hypothesized that using this device would decrease pocket closure times without increasing the risk of pocket infections. This is a single center, retrospective cohort study to compare pocket closure times and infection rates between ZIP and standard suture for CIED pocket closure.

METHODS

Two separate groups of consecutive new intravenous implants, upgrades, and pulse generator replacements from October 2015 to April 2017 were included. A total of 175 patients were included, using either ZIP (n = 80) or suture (n = 95). Total procedure time (local anesthetic to dressing application) and pocket closure time (fascial suture to dressing application) were compared. Pocket infections were defined as infections leading to CIED extraction or wound dehiscence requiring repeat procedure. Statistical analysis was performed using chi square test and Student's t test.

RESULTS

Pocket closure time and procedure time were significantly shorter for the ZIP group (14.9 ± 6.8 vs 20.1 ± 11.09 min, p = 0.0003) and (65.02 ± 30.4 vs 83.83 ± 40.3 min, p = 0.0008), respectively. No pocket infections occurred in the Zip group, while the suture group had 2:1 wound dehiscence and 1 pocket infection.

CONCLUSION

The ZIP device resulted in significantly shorter pocket closure and procedure times without increasing device pocket infections.

A cross-linking strategy provides a new generation of biodegradable and biocompatible cyanoacrylate medical adhesives

A general strategy provides a new generation of biodegradable and biocompatible cyanoacrylate medical adhesives.

Conservative Management of Skin Fistula Occurring after Internal Cardioverter Defibrillator Replacement

Skin fistula occurring after cardiac electronic device implantation is frequently related to pocket infection and this condition typically requires removal of device and lead(s). We report on a case of skin fistula occurring 3 weeks after internal cardioverter defibrillator replacement. Conservative management consisted of local care along with oral antibiotics without removal of device; this strategy resulted in complete healing and closure of the fistula.