Response rate in cardiac resynchronization therapy patients implanted with a left ventricular quadripolar lead and the MultiPoint™ pacing feature early activated. QUARTO III

BACKGROUND

Although cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is beneficial in most heart failure patients, up to 40% do not respond to CRT. It has been suggested that multipoint left ventricle pacing (MPP) would increase the response rate.

AIM

To assess the CRT response rate at 6 months in patients implanted with a CRT device with the MPP feature activated early after the implant.

METHODS

This was a multicentre, prospective, open-label and non-randomized study. The primary endpoint was response to biventricular pacing defined as >15% relative reduction in left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) comparing echocardiography measurements performed at baseline and 6 months by a core laboratory. Among secondary endpoints the combined endpoint of mortality or all-cause hospitalizations was evaluated. Primary study endpoint and clinical outcomes were compared to a Quarto II control cohort.

RESULTS

Totally, 105 patients were included. The response rate was 64.6% (97.5% lower confidence bound 53%). Mean relative reduction in LVESV was 25.3%, and mean absolute increase in LVEF was 9.4%. The subjects with device programmed using anatomical approach showed a trend towards higher responder rate than those using the electrical approach (72% vs. 61.1%, p = 0.32). Finally, the combined incidence of mortality and or all-cause hospitalizations at 6 month was 12.4%.

CONCLUSIONS

Early activation of MPP was not associated to an advantage increasing echocardiography responders to CRT at 6 months of follow-up. Nevertheless, patients programmed using widest pacing cathodes had a numerically higher responder rate. Finally, early activation of MPP was associated to a low incidence of clinical endpoints at 6 months of follow-up.

Electrogram analysis to detect cathodal and anodal capture in left ventricular cardiac resynchronization pacing leads

AIMS

Our study analyzed cardiac electrograms (EGMs) to identify characteristics for detecting cathodal, anodal, or cathodal-anodal (simultaneous) capture in left ventricular (LV) quadripolar pacing leads of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) patients. The relationship between these EGM characteristics and the electrocardiogram (ECG) was also examined.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of 54 bipolar pacing configurations across 9 patients with implanted CRT devices and quadripolar leads who had undergone a 12 lead ECG optimization. Three pacing tests (cathode unipolar, anode unipolar, and bipolar) per bipolar pair were performed, examining ECG and EGM morphology changes accompanying each test and any transitions of morphology or amplitude during voltage stepdown.

RESULTS

During the cathode and anode unipolar pacing tests, the EGM was biphasic (negative/positive) or monophasic (positive) in 52/53 (98%), and biphasic (positive/negative) or monophasic (negative) in 50/51 (98%) respectively. During bipolar LV capture threshold testing, 30 bipolar pairs displayed a sudden increase in EGM amplitude (median 9.4mV, interquartile range [7 to 14mV]) when transitioning from cathodal-anodal capture to cathodal or anodal capture. 90% of these EGM transitions had a corresponding simultaneous change in ECG, while 10% had no ECG changes. Two patients demonstrated "quad-site" capture on their quadripolar lead with multipoint pacing enabled and cathodal-anodal capture from each stimulus.

CONCLUSION

EGM characteristics during LV pacing tests can reliably detect cathodal, anodal, or cathodal-anodal capture, with greater sensitivity than 12 lead ECG changes. Integration of EGM analysis into routine CRT device follow up can be performed easily and may have implications for CRT efficacy. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Anodal stimulation in pediatric patients with permanent epicardial ventricular pacemakers

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to measure the frequency and factors associated with anodal stimulation in a pediatric population with epicardial pacing leads.

BACKGROUND

In bipolar pacemakers, capture of the myocardium typically occurs at the cathode. However, AS with capture at the anode has been described. This has not been described in epicardial pacemakers.

METHODS

Retrospective data were collected from patients ≤ 21 years of age with permanent bipolar epicardial ventricular pacemakers from 1/2017 to 1/2018. AS was defined as a clear change on surface ECG in at least one of the 12 leads assessed by two blinded pediatric electrophysiologists.

RESULTS

Twenty-four bipolar leads in 23 patients were included in the study. One patient had both biventricular leads tested. Median age was 7.1 years (IQR 5.0-10.9), weight was 20.9 kg (IQR 16.5-33.5), and 65% were male. Testing was performed at a median of 2.8 years (IQR 1.6-6.1) after implant. Congenital heart disease was present in 57%. Complete heart block was the pacemaker indication in 78%. AS was identified in 16/24 (67%) of leads tested. Identification of AS was associated with presence of congenital heart disease (p = 0.004) and 3DD between electrodes (p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

AS is common in pediatric patients and was associated with a history of congenital heart disease and greater estimated 3DD between electrodes. The prevalent nature of AS may allow clinicians to utilize existing pacemakers as multisite pacing systems.

Occurrence of simultaneous cathodal-anodal capture with left ventricular quadripolar leads for cardiac resynchronization therapy: an electrocardiogram evaluation

AIMS

The occurrence of left ventricular (LV) anodal activation during pacing with modern multipolar cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) systems has never been reported. The aim of our study was to demonstrate, by means of electrocardiogram (ECG) analysis, the occurrence of simultaneous cathodal-anodal LV capture with quadripolar LV leads.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We studied 10 first-time recipients of a CRT device equipped with a quadripolar LV lead. During follow-up, standard supine 12-lead ECGs were obtained in available cathode-to-anode LV pacing configurations with a pulse amplitude equal to twice the pacing threshold. The occurrence of simultaneous cathodal-anodal LV capture was defined as the presence of variations in electrocardiographic ventricular activation (EVA) when the distal tip (cathode)-to-device can (anode) pacing configuration was compared with the distal tip (cathode)-to-proximal ring (anode) configuration. In eight patients, we found differences in EVA when different LV sites were paced through the unipolar LV tip and unipolar LV ring configurations. In these patients, a difference in EVA was detected in 61.5% (59 of 96) of the ECG leads (marked difference in 31.3%, slight difference in 30.2%). Changes in EVA between unipolar tip-to-can and bipolar tip-to-ring pacing that were suggestive of cathodal-anodal LV capture were found in six patients. In these patients, a total of 30 (41.7%) ECG leads showed a difference in EVA (marked difference in 20.8%, slight difference in 20.8%).

CONCLUSION

In our experience, additional anodal capture by the proximal LV ring during LV pacing is provable in most recipients of a resynchronization device equipped with a multipolar LV lead.

Short-Term Availability of Viable Left Ventricular Pacing Sites with Quartet™ Quadripolar Leads

BACKGROUND Whether quadripolar leads can provide sufficient viable left ventricular pacing sites (LVPSs) for device optimization and multipoint pacing remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the acute and 3-month availability of viable LVPSs provided by a quadripolar LV pacing lead. MATERIAL AND METHODS A single-center cohort study evaluated consecutive patients who underwent a CRT implant with the QuartetTM LV lead under local guidelines. The availability of viable LVPSs was assessed at the pre-discharge and 3-month follow-up visit. Bipolar lead configurations, which served as the control group, were modeled by eliminating the 2 proximal electrodes on the Quartet™ LV lead. RESULTS A total of 24 patients were enrolled and finished 3-month follow-up. The mean follow-up period was 93±3 days. At pre-discharge, the Quartet™ LV lead provided more viable LVPSs compared with the bipolar equivalents (median 3 [IQR 2-4] vs. median 2 [IQR 1-2], P<0.001). The percentage of patients with at least 1, 2, 3, and 4 viable LVPSs were 100% (24/24), 91.7% (22/24), 58.3% (14/24), and 33.3% (8/24) for Quartet™ leads and 91.7% (22/24), 70.8% (17/24), 0% (0/24), and 0% (0/24) for bipolar lead configurations, respectively. The median and IQR values of viable LVPSs provided by the Quartet™ LV lead remained the same (3 [IQR 2-4]) between pre-discharge and 3-month follow-up (P=0.45). CONCLUSIONS Compared with the bipolar equivalent, QuartetTM LV lead provides more viable LVPSs and opportunities for CRT optimization and multipoint LV pacing. The number of LVPSs provided by Quartet™ leads remained unchanged between pre-discharge and 3-month follow-up.

Anodal stimulation in two dogs with transvenous permanent bipolar pacemakers

Management of symptomatic bradyarrhythmias such as complete atrioventricular block often involves permanent implantation of a transvenous pacemaker. Both during and after implantation, the operator can telemetrically assess and adjust a variety of electrical parameters associated with the pacemaker function in order to optimize the sensitivity, reliability, and power consumption of the device. Herein, we report an unexpected change in the paced electrocardiographic QRS complex morphology in two dogs undergoing bipolar pacing associated with changes in the pacemaker output amplitude settings first detected during threshold testing. The exclusivity of the electrocardiographic changes solely on pacemaker output settings, consistency between the surface electrocardiogram and ventricular endocardial electrogram, and resolution of this phenomenon when dogs were re-programmed to unipolar pacing is consistent with depolarization of the ventricular myocardium by the anodal electrode of the pacing lead at high pacemaker amplitudes. Anodal stimulation is a potential cause of varying QRS complex morphology witnessed during pacemaker evaluation and interrogation.

Bipolar left ventricular pacing is associated with significant reduction in heart failure or death in CRT-D patients with LBBB

BACKGROUND

There are limited data on the significance of left ventricular (LV) lead pacing polarity to predict clinical outcomes.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to determine the association between the LV lead pacing polarity for heart failure (HF) or death and ventricular tachyarrhythmias (VTA) in patients enrolled in MADIT-CRT (Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial with Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy), receiving a cardiac resynchronization therapy device with implanted cardioverter-defibrillator (CRT-D).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed LV pacing polarity. Patients with LV bipolar leads paced between LV ring and LV tip were identified as True Bipolar, while those with LV bipolar leads paced between LV tip or LV ring and right ventricular coil or unipolar leads were identified as Unipolar/Extended Bipolar. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models were used.

RESULTS

Of the 969 patients, 421 had True Bipolar pacing while the remainder (n = 548) had Unipolar/Extended Bipolar pacing. Among patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB), True Bipolar pacing was associated with lower cumulative incidence of death (P = .022) and HF/death (P = .046) compared to those with Unipolar/Extended Bipolar LV pacing. After adjustment for clinical covariates, bipolar LV pacing in LBBB patients was associated with 54% lower risk for death (HR: 0.46; 95% CI: 0.24-0.88; P = .020) and 32% lower risk for HF/death (HR: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.46-1.00; P = .048) compared to Unipolar/Extended Bipolar LV pacing, but not in those with non-LBBB. No association was seen with risk of ventricular tachyarrhythmia.

CONCLUSION

True Bipolar LV pacing configuration is associated with a significantly lower risk of HF/death and all-cause mortality in CRT-D patients with LBBB.

Preventing phrenic nerve stimulation by a patch insulation in an intact swine heart model

Introduction

Phrenic nerve stimulation (PNS) could be prevented by a silastic patch over the epicardial lead. We studied the effects in preventing PNS by placing a silastic patch directly over an epicardial lead or placing a graft around the phrenic nerve (PN).

Methods and Results

Fourteen Lanyu swine were enrolled. A bipolar lead was placed epicardially on the left ventricle (LV) inferior to the PN. An implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) lead was placed into the right ventricle (RV). The maximal influential distance (MID) was measured under 3 pacing configurations to express the influential electrical field on the PN. The threshold of the LV and PN were evaluated epicardially. Then, PTFE patches of different sizes (10×10 mm, 20×20 mm and 30×30 mm) were placed between the LV lead and PN to study the rise in PN threshold in 7 swine. On the other hand, the PN were surrounded by a PTFE graft of different lengths (10 mm, 20 mm, and 30 mm) in the remaining 7 swine. LV-bipolar pacing showed the shortest MID when compared to the other 2 unipolar pacing configurations at pacing voltage of 10 V. The patch was most effective in preventing PNS during LV-bipolar pacing. PNS was prevented under all circumstances with a larger PTFE patch (30×30 mm) or long graft (30 mm).

Conclusions

PNS was avoided by placing a PTFE patch over the LV lead or a graft around the PN despite pacing configurations. Hence if PNS persisted during CRT implantation, a PTFE patch on the LV lead or a graft around the PN could be considered.