Utility of catastrophizing, body symptom diagram score and history of opioid use to predict future health care utilization after a primary care visit for musculoskeletal pain

Associations between smoking history, baseline pain interference and symptom distribution, and physical function at discharge, in individuals seeking care for musculoskeletal pain

OBJECTIVE

Study of the association between smoking and pain intensity has produced conflicting results; with less focus on pain interference. Different pain constructs could have varying associations with smoking behaviors. This study sought to investigate the association between smoking history and not only pain intensity, but also pain interference, symptom distribution and physical function.

METHODS

Smoking history (current, past, or none), pain interference (Pain, Enjoyment of Life, and General Activity scale), symptom distribution and physical function scores were extracted from medical records of patients seen in physical therapy for common sites of musculoskeletal pain (lumbar and cervical spine, knee, or hip). Generalized linear models assessed the relationship between smoking history and pain/function.

RESULTS

833 patients from an integrated healthcare system were included (mean: 57.6 years, SD=16.3; 43 % male). After controlling for several variables, current smokers had significantly higher baseline pain interference scores compared to never and former smokers (beta [B]: 0.65, 95 %CI: 0.13 to 1.18, P=.02). Smoking was not a significant predictor of symptom distribution at baseline [B: 0.17, 95 %CI -0.06 to 0.42, P=.16] or physical function scores at discharge [B: -0.03, 95 %CI: -0.08 to 0.02, P=.25].

CONCLUSION

Smokers experienced a greater impact of pain at baseline. However, symptom distribution at intake and function upon discharge were similar between all smoking groups. These findings suggest smoking cessation and abstinence may be important recommendations to help curb pain interference.

Pain acceptance predicts healthcare utilization in women with chronic pelvic pain

Background:

Chronic pelvic pain (CPP) in women is common and costly, and little is known about patient characteristics predicting healthcare utilization within this population. The present study examined the role of pain acceptance and pain catastrophizing, assessed prior to treatment initiation, in predicting future uptake of medical and surgical interventions specifically for pain management.

Methods:

Our sample comprised women referred to a tertiary gynecological center. Baseline pain catastrophizing and pain acceptance scores were compared across each major medication class and surgery type, as well as across the total number of medication classes and the total number of surgery types using analysis of variance (ANOVA). We then performed multivariable analyses for the association between pain catastrophizing and pain acceptance and treatment utilization by controlling for potential confounders.

Results:

Three hundred eighteen patients met inclusion criteria. Pain catastrophizing was associated with increased likelihood of neuromodulator prescription, while pain acceptance was associated with reduced likelihood of neuromodulator prescription and fewer medication classes prescribed. Overall, no associations between pain catastrophizing and surgeries were observed, while pain acceptance was significantly associated with lower risk of hysterectomy/oophorectomy.

Conclusion:

Pain acceptance was a robust predictor of number of medication classes prescribed and use of radical surgeries even when controlling stringently for confounders. It is worth considering routine assessment of pain acceptance early in treatment of CPP to identify those more at-risk of higher treatment utilization, and potentially mitigate this through engagement with appropriate behavioral therapies.

Does Engaging Patients with Relevant Education About Long-Term Opioid Use Before Spine Surgery Affect Long-term Opioid Use? A Randomized Controlled Trial

STUDY DESIGN

Parallel-arm randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effectiveness of an enhanced video education session highlighting risks of opioid utilization on longterm opioid utilization after spine surgery.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Long-term opioid use occurs in more than half of patients undergoing spine surgery and strategies to reduce this use are needed.

METHODS

Patients undergoing spine surgery at Brooke Army Medical Center between July 2015 and February 2017 were recruited at their preoperative appointment, receiving the singlesession interactive video education or control at that same appointment. Opioid utilization was tracked for the full year after surgery from the Pharmacy Data Transaction Service of the Military Health System Data Repository. Self-reported pain also collected weekly for 1 and at 6months.

RESULTS

A total of 120 participants (40 women, 33.3%) with a mean age of 45.9 ± 10.6 years were randomized 1:1 to the enhanced education and usual care control (60 per group). In the year following surgery the cohort had a mean 5.1 (standard deviation [SD] 5.9) unique prescription fills, mean total days' supply was 88.3 (SD 134.9), and mean cumulative morphine milligrams equivalents per participant was 4193.0 (SD 12,187.9) within the year after surgery, with no significant differences in any opioid use measures between groups. Twelve individuals in the standard care group and 13 in the enhanced education group were classified with having long-term opioid utilization.

CONCLUSION

The video education session did not influence opioid use after spine surgery compared to the usual care control. There was no significant difference in individuals classified as long-term opioid users after surgery based on the intervention group. Prior opioid use was a strong predictor of future opioid use in this cohort. Strategies to improve education engagement, understanding, and decision- making continue to be of high importance for mitigating risk of long-term opioid use after spine surgery.Level of Evidence: 1.

AGA Clinical Practice Update on Management of Chronic Gastrointestinal Pain in Disorders of Gut-Brain Interaction: Expert Review

DESCRIPTION

This expert review summarizes approaches to management of pain in disorders of gut-brain interaction. This review focuses specifically on approaches to pain that persist if first-line therapies aimed at addressing visceral causes of pain are unsuccessful. The roles of a therapeutic patient-provider relationship, nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic therapies, and avoidance of opioids are discussed.

METHODS

This was not a formal systematic review but was based on a review of the literature to provide best practice advice statements. No formal rating of the quality of evidence or strength of recommendation was performed. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 1: Effective management of persistent pain in disorders of gut-brain interaction requires a collaborative, empathic, culturally sensitive, patient-provider relationship. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 2: Providers should master patient-friendly language about the pathogenesis of pain, leveraging advances in neuroscience and behavioral science. Providers also must understand the psychological contexts in which pain is perpetuated. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 3: Opioids should not be prescribed for chronic gastrointestinal pain because of a disorder of gut-brain interaction. If patients are referred on opioids, these medications should be prescribed responsibly, via multidisciplinary collaboration, until they can be discontinued. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 4: Nonpharmacologic therapies should be considered routinely as part of comprehensive pain management, and ideally brought up early on in care. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 5: Providers should optimize medical therapies that are known to modulate pain and be able to differentiate when gastrointestinal pain is triggered by visceral factors vs centrally mediated factors. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 6: Providers should familiarize themselves with a few effective neuromodulators, knowing the dosing, side effects, and targets of each and be able to explain to the patient why these drugs are used for the management of persistent pain.

The influence of a MOBile-based video Instruction for Low back pain (MOBIL) on initial care decisions made by primary care providers: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Adherence to guidelines for back pain continues to be a challenge, prompting strategies focused on improving education around biopsychosocial frameworks.

OBJECTIVE

Assess the influence of an interactive educational mobile app for patients on initial care decisions made for low back pain by the primary care provider. The secondary aim was to compare changes in self-reported pain and function between groups.

METHODS

This was a randomized controlled trial involving patients consulting for an initial episode of low back pain. The intervention was a mobile video-based education session (Truth About Low Back Pain) compared to usual care. The app focused on addressing maladaptive beliefs typically associated with higher risk of receiving low-value care options. The primary outcome was initial medical utilization decisions made by primary care practitioners (x-rays, MRIs, opioid prescriptions, injections, procedures) and secondary outcomes included PROMIS pain interference and physical function subscales at 1 and 6 months, and total medical costs.

RESULTS

Of 208 participants (71.2% male; mean age 35.4 years), rates of opioid prescriptions, advanced imaging, analgesic patches, spine injections, and physical therapy use were lower in the education group, but the differences were not significant. Total back-related medical costs for 1 year (mean diff = $132; P = 0.63) and none of the 6-month PROMIS subscales were significantly different between groups. Results were no different in opioid-naïve subjects. Instead, prior opioid use and high-risk of poor prognosis on the STarT Back Screening Tool predicted 1-year back pain-related costs and healthcare utilization, regardless of intervention.

CONCLUSION

Factors that influence medical treatment decisions and guideline-concordant care are complex. This particular patient education approach directed at patients did not appear to influence healthcare decisions made by primary care providers. Future studies should focus on high-risk populations and/or the impact of including the medical provider as an active part of the educational process.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.gov NCT02777983 .

The influence of prior opioid use on healthcare utilization and recurrence rates for non-surgical patients seeking initial care for patellofemoral pain

INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES

Prior opioid use can influence outcomes for patients with musculoskeletal disorders. The purpose of this study was to compare downstream medical utilization-based outcomes (costs, visits, recurrent episodes) after an initial diagnosis of patellofemoral pain based on pre-injury utilization of opioids.

METHOD

A total of 85,7880 consecutive patients were followed for a full 12 months before and 24 months after an initial diagnosis of patellofemoral pain (January 2009 to December 2013). Data were sourced from the Military Health System Data Repository, a single-payer closed government system. Opioid prescription fills were identified, and medical visits and costs were calculated for all knee-related medical care, to include recurrence rates in the 2-year surveillance period.

RESULTS

A relatively small number of individuals filled an opioid prescription in the year prior (n = 1746; 2.0%); however, these individuals had almost twice the mean costs of knee-related medical care ($1557 versus %802) and medical visits (8.4 versus 4.0). Patients with prior opioid use were more likely to have at least 1 recurrent episode of knee pain (relative risk 1.58, 95% CI 1.51, 1.65) with a higher mean number of episodes of knee pain (1.5 vs 1.8). The use of opioids with higher risk of misuse or dependency (Schedule II or III) resulted in greater medical costs (for any reason) and recurrent episodes of knee pain compared to the use of opioids in a lower risk category (Schedule IV).

CONCLUSIONS

Prior opioid utilization was associated with a greater number of recurrent episodes of knee pain and higher downstream medical costs compared with individuals without prior opioid use. For individuals with prior opioid utilization, opioids with higher risk of misuse or dependency (Schedule II or III) resulted in greater medical costs (for any reason) and recurrent episodes compared to the use of lower-risk opioids (Schedule IV). Key Points • Patients with prior opioid use had much greater knee-related medical costs compared to patients without prior opioid use. • Patients with prior opioid use were more likely to have additional episodes of knee pain in the following 2 years compared to patients without prior opioid use. • Prior opioid use has predicted higher costs and poor outcomes after surgery, but this is the first study to confirm similar findings in non-surgical patients.