1
|
Yadav S, Couch FJ, Domchek SM. Germline Genetic Testing for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer: Current Concepts in Risk Evaluation. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 2024; 14:a041318. [PMID: 38151326 PMCID: PMC11293548 DOI: 10.1101/cshperspect.a041318] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2023]
Abstract
Our understanding of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer has significantly improved over the past two decades. In addition to BRCA1/2, pathogenic variants in several other DNA-repair genes have been shown to increase the risks of breast and ovarian cancer. The magnitude of cancer risk is impacted not only by the gene involved, but also by family history of cancer, polygenic risk scores, and, in certain genes, pathogenic variant type or location. While estimates of breast and ovarian cancer risk associated with pathogenic variants are available, these are predominantly based on studies of high-risk populations with young age at diagnosis of cancer, multiple primary cancers, or family history of cancer. More recently, breast cancer risk for germline pathogenic variant carriers has been estimated from population-based studies. Here, we provide a review of the field of germline genetic testing and risk evaluation for hereditary breast and ovarian cancers in high-risk and population-based settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siddhartha Yadav
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA
| | - Fergus J Couch
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55901, USA
| | - Susan M Domchek
- Basser Center for BRCA, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Miyahira AK, Kamran SC, Jamaspishvili T, Marshall CH, Maxwell KN, Parolia A, Zorko NA, Pienta KJ, Soule HR. Disrupting prostate cancer research: Challenge accepted; report from the 2023 Coffey-Holden Prostate Cancer Academy Meeting. Prostate 2024; 84:993-1015. [PMID: 38682886 DOI: 10.1002/pros.24721] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2024] [Accepted: 04/16/2024] [Indexed: 05/01/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The 2023 Coffey-Holden Prostate Cancer Academy (CHPCA) Meeting, themed "Disrupting Prostate Cancer Research: Challenge Accepted," was convened at the University of California, Los Angeles, Luskin Conference Center, in Los Angeles, CA, from June 22 to 25, 2023. METHODS The 2023 marked the 10th Annual CHPCA Meeting, a discussion-oriented scientific think-tank conference convened annually by the Prostate Cancer Foundation, which centers on innovative and emerging research topics deemed pivotal for advancing critical unmet needs in prostate cancer research and clinical care. The 2023 CHPCA Meeting was attended by 81 academic investigators and included 40 talks across 8 sessions. RESULTS The central topic areas covered at the meeting included: targeting transcription factor neo-enhancesomes in cancer, AR as a pro-differentiation and oncogenic transcription factor, why few are cured with androgen deprivation therapy and how to change dogma to cure metastatic prostate cancer without castration, reducing prostate cancer morbidity and mortality with genetics, opportunities for radiation to enhance therapeutic benefit in oligometastatic prostate cancer, novel immunotherapeutic approaches, and the new era of artificial intelligence-driven precision medicine. DISCUSSION This article provides an overview of the scientific presentations delivered at the 2023 CHPCA Meeting, such that this knowledge can help in facilitating the advancement of prostate cancer research worldwide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea K Miyahira
- Science Department, Prostate Cancer Foundation, Santa Monica, California, USA
| | - Sophia C Kamran
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Tamara Jamaspishvili
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York, USA
| | - Catherine H Marshall
- Department of Oncology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Kara N Maxwell
- Department of Medicine-Hematology/Oncology and Department of Genetics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Medicine Service, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Abhijit Parolia
- Department of Pathology, Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Nicholas A Zorko
- Division of Hematology, Oncology and Transplantation, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
- University of Minnesota Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Kenneth J Pienta
- The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Howard R Soule
- Science Department, Prostate Cancer Foundation, Santa Monica, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kim J, Choi CH. Basic knowledge for counseling patients undergoing risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy. Obstet Gynecol Sci 2024; 67:343-355. [PMID: 38817104 PMCID: PMC11266848 DOI: 10.5468/ogs.24054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2024] [Revised: 05/09/2024] [Accepted: 05/23/2024] [Indexed: 06/01/2024] Open
Abstract
Significant progress has been made in the molecular diagnosis of cancer. It provides personalized medicine, including cancer diagnosis, prognosis, targeted therapy, and risk detection. These advances allow physicians to identify patients at risk for cancer before it develops and offer them an opportunity to prevent its development. Mutations in breast cancer susceptibility genes 1 and 2 (BRCA1 and 2) are one of the most well-known cancer-related gene mutations since actor Angelina Jolie shared her experience with genetic mutations and risk-reducing surgery in the media. In Korea, tests for germline BRCA1/2 mutations have been covered by insurance since May 2012 and the number of women of BRCA1/2 mutations has continued to increase over the past decade. Most carriers of BRCA1/2 mutations consider risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) resulting in early menopause and want to know the lifetime risks and benefits of RRSO. However, despite the increasing number of carriers of BRCA1/2 mutations, the counseling and management of patients requiring RRSO varies among physicians. This article provides basic knowledge on RRSO to help physicians comprehensively assess its risks and benefits and manage at-risk women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jihye Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chung-Ang University Gwangmyeong Hospital, Gwangmyeong, Korea
| | - Chel Hun Choi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dareng EO, Coetzee SG, Tyrer JP, Peng PC, Rosenow W, Chen S, Davis BD, Dezem FS, Seo JH, Nameki R, Reyes AL, Aben KKH, Anton-Culver H, Antonenkova NN, Aravantinos G, Bandera EV, Beane Freeman LE, Beckmann MW, Beeghly-Fadiel A, Benitez J, Bernardini MQ, Bjorge L, Black A, Bogdanova NV, Bolton KL, Brenton JD, Budzilowska A, Butzow R, Cai H, Campbell I, Cannioto R, Chang-Claude J, Chanock SJ, Chen K, Chenevix-Trench G, Chiew YE, Cook LS, DeFazio A, Dennis J, Doherty JA, Dörk T, du Bois A, Dürst M, Eccles DM, Ene G, Fasching PA, Flanagan JM, Fortner RT, Fostira F, Gentry-Maharaj A, Giles GG, Goodman MT, Gronwald J, Haiman CA, Håkansson N, Heitz F, Hildebrandt MAT, Høgdall E, Høgdall CK, Huang RY, Jensen A, Jones ME, Kang D, Karlan BY, Karnezis AN, Kelemen LE, Kennedy CJ, Khusnutdinova EK, Kiemeney LA, Kjaer SK, Kupryjanczyk J, Labrie M, Lambrechts D, Larson MC, Le ND, Lester J, Li L, Lubiński J, Lush M, Marks JR, Matsuo K, May T, McLaughlin JR, McNeish IA, Menon U, Missmer S, Modugno F, Moffitt M, Monteiro AN, Moysich KB, Narod SA, Nguyen-Dumont T, Odunsi K, Olsson H, Onland-Moret NC, Park SK, Pejovic T, Permuth JB, Piskorz A, Prokofyeva D, Riggan MJ, Risch HA, Rodríguez-Antona C, Rossing MA, Sandler DP, Setiawan VW, Shan K, Song H, Southey MC, Steed H, Sutphen R, Swerdlow AJ, Teo SH, Terry KL, Thompson PJ, Vestrheim Thomsen LC, Titus L, Trabert B, Travis R, Tworoger SS, Valen E, Van Nieuwenhuysen E, Edwards DV, Vierkant RA, Webb PM, Weinberg CR, Weise RM, Wentzensen N, White E, Winham SJ, Wolk A, Woo YL, Wu AH, Yan L, Yannoukakos D, Zeinomar N, Zheng W, Ziogas A, Berchuck A, Goode EL, Huntsman DG, Pearce CL, Ramus SJ, Sellers TA, Freedman ML, Lawrenson K, Schildkraut JM, Hazelett D, Plummer JT, Kar S, Jones MR, Pharoah PDP, Gayther SA. Integrative multi-omics analyses to identify the genetic and functional mechanisms underlying ovarian cancer risk regions. Am J Hum Genet 2024; 111:1061-1083. [PMID: 38723632 PMCID: PMC11179261 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2024.04.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2022] [Revised: 04/16/2024] [Accepted: 04/16/2024] [Indexed: 06/07/2024] Open
Abstract
To identify credible causal risk variants (CCVs) associated with different histotypes of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), we performed genome-wide association analysis for 470,825 genotyped and 10,163,797 imputed SNPs in 25,981 EOC cases and 105,724 controls of European origin. We identified five histotype-specific EOC risk regions (p value <5 × 10-8) and confirmed previously reported associations for 27 risk regions. Conditional analyses identified an additional 11 signals independent of the primary signal at six risk regions (p value <10-5). Fine mapping identified 4,008 CCVs in these regions, of which 1,452 CCVs were located in ovarian cancer-related chromatin marks with significant enrichment in active enhancers, active promoters, and active regions for CCVs from each EOC histotype. Transcriptome-wide association and colocalization analyses across histotypes using tissue-specific and cross-tissue datasets identified 86 candidate susceptibility genes in known EOC risk regions and 32 genes in 23 additional genomic regions that may represent novel EOC risk loci (false discovery rate <0.05). Finally, by integrating genome-wide HiChIP interactome analysis with transcriptome-wide association study (TWAS), variant effect predictor, transcription factor ChIP-seq, and motifbreakR data, we identified candidate gene-CCV interactions at each locus. This included risk loci where TWAS identified one or more candidate susceptibility genes (e.g., HOXD-AS2, HOXD8, and HOXD3 at 2q31) and other loci where no candidate gene was identified (e.g., MYC and PVT1 at 8q24) by TWAS. In summary, this study describes a functional framework and provides a greater understanding of the biological significance of risk alleles and candidate gene targets at EOC susceptibility loci identified by a genome-wide association study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eileen O Dareng
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Simon G Coetzee
- Center for Bioinformatics and Functional Genomics and the Cedars Sinai Genomics Core, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Jonathan P Tyrer
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Pei-Chen Peng
- Center for Bioinformatics and Functional Genomics and the Cedars Sinai Genomics Core, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Will Rosenow
- 3Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Stephanie Chen
- Center for Bioinformatics and Functional Genomics and the Cedars Sinai Genomics Core, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Applied Genomics, Computation and Translational Core, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Brian D Davis
- Center for Bioinformatics and Functional Genomics and the Cedars Sinai Genomics Core, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Applied Genomics, Computation and Translational Core, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Felipe Segato Dezem
- Center for Bioinformatics and Functional Genomics and the Cedars Sinai Genomics Core, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Ji-Heui Seo
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; The Center for Functional Cancer Epigenetics, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Robbin Nameki
- Women's Cancer Program, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Alberto L Reyes
- Center for Bioinformatics and Functional Genomics and the Cedars Sinai Genomics Core, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Katja K H Aben
- Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Hoda Anton-Culver
- Department of Medicine, Genetic Epidemiology Research Institute, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - Natalia N Antonenkova
- N.N. Alexandrov Research Institute of Oncology and Medical Radiology, Minsk, Belarus
| | | | - Elisa V Bandera
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Laura E Beane Freeman
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Matthias W Beckmann
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Alicia Beeghly-Fadiel
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Javier Benitez
- Human Genetics Group, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Madrid, Spain; Centre for Biomedical Network Research on Rare Diseases (CIBERER), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Marcus Q Bernardini
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University Health Network, Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Line Bjorge
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway; Centre for Cancer Biomarkers CCBIO, Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Amanda Black
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Natalia V Bogdanova
- N.N. Alexandrov Research Institute of Oncology and Medical Radiology, Minsk, Belarus; Department of Radiation Oncology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany; Gynaecology Research Unit, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Kelly L Bolton
- Division of Biology and Biomedical Sciences, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - James D Brenton
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Agnieszka Budzilowska
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Diagnostics, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Ralf Butzow
- Department of Pathology, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Hui Cai
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Ian Campbell
- Cancer Genetics Laboratory, Research Division, Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Rikki Cannioto
- Cancer Pathology & Prevention, Division of Cancer Prevention and Population Sciences, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Jenny Chang-Claude
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Cancer Epidemiology Group, University Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Stephen J Chanock
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Kexin Chen
- Department of Epidemiology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Georgia Chenevix-Trench
- Department of Genetics and Computational Biology, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Yoke-Eng Chiew
- Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Linda S Cook
- Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA; Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Anna DeFazio
- Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia; The Daffodil Centre, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Joe Dennis
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Jennifer A Doherty
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Thilo Dörk
- Gynaecology Research Unit, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Andreas du Bois
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology; HSK, Dr. Horst-Schmidt Klinik, Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden, Germany; Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Evangelische Kliniken Essen-Mitte (KEM), Essen, Germany
| | - Matthias Dürst
- Department of Gynaecology, Jena University Hospital - Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, Germany
| | - Diana M Eccles
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Gabrielle Ene
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University Health Network, Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Peter A Fasching
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - James M Flanagan
- Division of Cancer and Ovarian Cancer Action Research Centre, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Renée T Fortner
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Florentia Fostira
- Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory, INRASTES, National Centre for Scientific Research 'Demokritos', Athens, Greece
| | - Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Clinical Trials & Methodology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Graham G Giles
- Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Marc T Goodman
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Cedars-Sinai Cancer, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Jacek Gronwald
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Christopher A Haiman
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Niclas Håkansson
- Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Florian Heitz
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology; HSK, Dr. Horst-Schmidt Klinik, Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden, Germany; Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Evangelische Kliniken Essen-Mitte (KEM), Essen, Germany; Center for Pathology, Evangelische Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | | | - Estrid Høgdall
- Department of Pathology, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Claus K Høgdall
- Department of Gynaecology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ruea-Yea Huang
- Center For Immunotherapy, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Allan Jensen
- Department of Virus, Lifestyle and Genes, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Michael E Jones
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Daehee Kang
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Beth Y Karlan
- David Geffen School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Anthony N Karnezis
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, UC Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Linda E Kelemen
- Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Catherine J Kennedy
- Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia; The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Elza K Khusnutdinova
- Institute of Biochemistry and Genetics of the Ufa Federal Research Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Ufa, Russia; Department of Genetics and Fundamental Medicine, Bashkir State University, Ufa, Russia
| | - Lambertus A Kiemeney
- Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Susanne K Kjaer
- Department of Gynaecology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Virus, Lifestyle and Genes, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jolanta Kupryjanczyk
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Diagnostics, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Marilyne Labrie
- Department of Immunology and Cell Biology, FMSS - Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
| | - Diether Lambrechts
- Laboratory for Translational Genetics, Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; VIB Center for Cancer Biology, VIB, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Melissa C Larson
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Division of Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Nhu D Le
- Cancer Control Research, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Jenny Lester
- David Geffen School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Lian Li
- Department of Epidemiology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Jan Lubiński
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Michael Lush
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Jeffrey R Marks
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Hospital, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Keitaro Matsuo
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention, Aichi Cancer Center Research Institute, Nagoya, Japan; Division of Cancer Epidemiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Taymaa May
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University Health Network, Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - John R McLaughlin
- Public Health Ontario, Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Iain A McNeish
- Division of Cancer and Ovarian Cancer Action Research Centre, Department Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK; Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Usha Menon
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Clinical Trials & Methodology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Stacey Missmer
- Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Obstetrics and Gynecology Epidemiology Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Francesmary Modugno
- Women's Cancer Research Center, Magee-Womens Research Institute and Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Melissa Moffitt
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Alvaro N Monteiro
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Kirsten B Moysich
- Department of Cancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Steven A Narod
- Women's College Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Tu Nguyen-Dumont
- Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia; Department of Clinical Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Kunle Odunsi
- University of Chicago Medicine Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, IL, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Håkan Olsson
- Oncology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - N Charlotte Onland-Moret
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Utrecht, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Sue K Park
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea; Integrated Major in Innovative Medical Science, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Tanja Pejovic
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA; Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Jennifer B Permuth
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Anna Piskorz
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Darya Prokofyeva
- Department of Genetics and Fundamental Medicine, Bashkir State University, Ufa, Russia
| | - Marjorie J Riggan
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Duke University Hospital, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Harvey A Risch
- Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Cristina Rodríguez-Antona
- Centre for Biomedical Network Research on Rare Diseases (CIBERER), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain; Hereditary Endocrine Cancer Group, Spanish National Cancer Research Center (CNIO), Madrid, Spain
| | - Mary Anne Rossing
- Program in Epidemiology, Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA; Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Dale P Sandler
- Epidemiology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, NIH, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | - V Wendy Setiawan
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Kang Shan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hebei Medical University, Fourth Hospital, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Honglin Song
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Melissa C Southey
- Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia; Department of Clinical Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Helen Steed
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Section of Gynecologic Oncology Surgery, Alberta Health Services, North Zone, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Rebecca Sutphen
- Epidemiology Center, College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Anthony J Swerdlow
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Division of Breast Cancer Research, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Soo Hwang Teo
- Breast Cancer Research Programme, Cancer Research Malaysia, Subang Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia; Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Kathryn L Terry
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA; Obstetrics and Gynecology Epidemiology Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gyneoclogy, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Pamela J Thompson
- Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cancer Prevention and Genetics Program, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Liv Cecilie Vestrheim Thomsen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway; Centre for Cancer Biomarkers CCBIO, Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Linda Titus
- Muskie School of Public Service, University of Southern Maine, Portland, ME, USA
| | - Britton Trabert
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Ruth Travis
- Cancer Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Shelley S Tworoger
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Ellen Valen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway; Centre for Cancer Biomarkers CCBIO, Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Els Van Nieuwenhuysen
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Leuven Cancer Institute, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Digna Velez Edwards
- Division of Quantitative Sciences, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Women's Health Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Robert A Vierkant
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Division of Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Penelope M Webb
- Population Health Department, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Clarice R Weinberg
- Biostatistics and Computational Biology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, NIH, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | - Rayna Matsuno Weise
- Cancer Epidemiology Program, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, HI, USA
| | - Nicolas Wentzensen
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Emily White
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Stacey J Winham
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Division of Computational Biology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Alicja Wolk
- Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Yin-Ling Woo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Malaya Medical Centre, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Anna H Wu
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Li Yan
- Department of Molecular Biology, Hebei Medical University, Fourth Hospital, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Drakoulis Yannoukakos
- Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory, INRASTES, National Centre for Scientific Research 'Demokritos', Athens, Greece
| | - Nur Zeinomar
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Wei Zheng
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Argyrios Ziogas
- Department of Medicine, Genetic Epidemiology Research Institute, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - Andrew Berchuck
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Duke University Hospital, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Ellen L Goode
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Division of Epidemiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - David G Huntsman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Department of Molecular Oncology, BC Cancer Research Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Celeste L Pearce
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Susan J Ramus
- School of Women's and Children's Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of NSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Adult Cancer Program, Lowy Cancer Research Centre, University of NSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Matthew L Freedman
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; The Center for Functional Cancer Epigenetics, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kate Lawrenson
- Women's Cancer Program, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Joellen M Schildkraut
- Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Dennis Hazelett
- Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, The Center for Bioinformatics and Functional Biology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Jasmine T Plummer
- Center for Bioinformatics and Functional Genomics and the Cedars Sinai Genomics Core, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Applied Genomics, Computation and Translational Core, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Siddhartha Kar
- MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK; Section of Translational Epidemiology, Division of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Michelle R Jones
- Center for Bioinformatics and Functional Genomics and the Cedars Sinai Genomics Core, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Paul D P Pharoah
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
| | - Simon A Gayther
- Center for Bioinformatics and Functional Genomics and the Cedars Sinai Genomics Core, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Grigore LG, Radoi VE, Serban A, Mihai AD, Stoica I. The Molecular Detection of Germline Mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 Genes Associated with Breast and Ovarian Cancer in a Romanian Cohort of 616 Patients. Curr Issues Mol Biol 2024; 46:4630-4645. [PMID: 38785549 PMCID: PMC11119367 DOI: 10.3390/cimb46050281] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2024] [Revised: 05/07/2024] [Accepted: 05/10/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024] Open
Abstract
The objective of this study was to identify and classify the spectrum of mutations found in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes associated with breast and ovarian cancer in female patients in Romania. Germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations were investigated in a cohort of 616 female patients using NGS and/or MLPA methods followed by software-based data analysis and classification according to international guidelines. Out of the 616 female patients included in this study, we found that 482 patients (78.2%) did not have any mutation present in the two genes investigated; 69 patients (11.2%) had a BRCA1 mutation, 34 (5.5%) had a BRCA2 mutation, and 31 (5%) presented different type of mutations with uncertain clinical significance, moderate risk or a large mutation in the BRCA1 gene. Our investigation indicates the most common mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes, associated with breast and ovarian cancer in the Romanian population. Our results also bring more data in support of the frequency of the c.5266 mutation in the BRCA1 gene, acknowledged in the literature as a founder mutation in Eastern Europe. We consider that the results of our study will provide necessary data regarding BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations that would help to create a genetic database for the Romanian population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liliana-Georgiana Grigore
- Doctoral School of Biology, Faculty of Biology, University of Bucharest, 030018 Bucharest, Romania
- Personal Genetics, 010987 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Viorica-Elena Radoi
- Department of Medical Genetics, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania
- “Alessandrescu-Rusescu” National Institute for Maternal and Child Health, 20382 Bucharest, Romania
| | | | | | - Ileana Stoica
- Department of Genetics, Faculty of Biology, University of Bucharest, 030018 Bucharest, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
de Oliveira Ferreira C, Carneiro VCG, Araujo Mariz C. Germline mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 among Brazilian women with ovarian cancer treated in the Public Health System. BMC Cancer 2024; 24:499. [PMID: 38641594 PMCID: PMC11027424 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-12246-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2024] [Accepted: 04/10/2024] [Indexed: 04/21/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Germline mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes are among the main causes of hereditary ovarian cancer. Identifying these mutations may reduce cancer risk, facilitate early detection, and enable personalized treatment. However, genetic testing is limited in the Brazilian Public Health System, and data regarding germline mutations in many regions are scarce. Therefore, the study aimed to investigate the prevalence of germline mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 in women with ovarian cancer treated in the Public Health System in Pernambuco, Brazil. METHODS A cross-sectional study was conducted in the Hereditary Cancer Program from two reference oncological centers in Pernambuco. Women (n = 45) with high-grade serous ovarian cancer underwent genetic counseling and DNA sequencing for BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. RESULTS The prevalence of deleterious mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes was 33%. Of the 15 germline mutations found, 13 were in BRCA1 and 2 in BRCA2; two mutations of unknown clinical significance were also found in BRCA2. Mutations c.5266dupC and c.2215 A > T were the most frequent; each was mutation observed in three patients. Additionally, the mutations c.7645dupT and c.921dupT were reported for the first time. CONCLUSION One in three women showed a pathogenic mutation, demonstrating a significant prevalence of germline mutations in this sample. Additionally, the small sample revealed an interesting number of mutations, indicating the need to explore more regions of the country.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Vandré Cabral Gomes Carneiro
- Hospital de Câncer de Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil
- Instituto de Medicina Integral Professor Fernando Figueira, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil
| | - Carolline Araujo Mariz
- Instituto Aggeu Magalhães, FIOCRUZ, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
- Faculdade de Medicina de Olinda, Olinda, Pernambuco, Brazil.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Loizzi V, Mongelli M, Arezzo F, Romagno I, Cazzato G, Popescu O, Legge F, Trerotoli P, Silvestris E, Kardhashi A, Cormio G. BRCA Mutation Patients: Are There Other Predisposing Factors for Ovarian Cancer Occurrence? A Multicenter Retrospective Study. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2024; 89:87-94. [PMID: 38246147 DOI: 10.1159/000535012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2023] [Accepted: 10/29/2023] [Indexed: 01/23/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The objective of this multicenter retrospective study aimed to evaluate the association of clinical variables and the incidence of ovarian cancer in patients with BRCA 1-2 mutation carriers who underwent risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO). DESIGN Patients with a pathogenic mutation of BRCA 1-2 genes and with no evidence of disease are considered eligible. The exclusion criterion was the refusal to undergo the surgery. The retrospective study included all RRSO performed from May 2015 to April 2022 in the three gynecological Institutions of Southern Italy for were included in this retrospective study. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Age, menarche age, BMI, menopause at time of RRSO, breast cancer first- and second-degree relatives, ovarian cancer first- and second-degree relatives, estroprogestin use, pregnancy normal full-term delivery, history of endometriosis, previous breast cancer and histologic type, previous abdominal/pelvic surgery, BRCA 1 or BRCA 2 status, preoperative serum CA-125 levels (IU/mL), age at time of RRSO and histological analysis were collected. RESULTS 184 were recruited. One was excluded. To assess cancer risk, the outcome variable was classified into three classes: no event, cancer, and other conditions excluding cancer. 14 women presented ovarian cancer and tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC) on histopathologic final report. Ovarian cancer was found in 8 patients, whereas the presence of STIC was found in 6 of them. LIMITATIONS The low incidence of patients diagnosed with ovarian cancer or STIC compared with the total number of patients undergoing RRSO is a potential bias. CONCLUSIONS Our study did not demonstrate a correlation between clinical features and the occurrence of precancerous or cancerous lesions in BRCA mutation carrier patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vera Loizzi
- S.S.D. Ginecologia Oncologica Clinicizzata, IRCCS Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II", Bari, Italy
- Dipartimento di Biomedicina Traslazionale e Neuroscienze (DiBraiN), University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy
| | - Michele Mongelli
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit, University of "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy
| | - Francesca Arezzo
- Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine (DIM), University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy
| | - Isabella Romagno
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit, University of "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy
| | - Gerardo Cazzato
- Section of Pathology, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation (DETO), University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy
| | - Ondina Popescu
- S.C. Anatomia Patologica, IRCCS Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II", Bari, Italy
| | - Francesco Legge
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, General Regional Hospital "F. Miulli", Acquaviva Delle Fonti, Italy
| | - Paolo Trerotoli
- Medical Statistic and Biometry Unit, Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy
| | - Erica Silvestris
- S.S.D. Ginecologia Oncologica Clinicizzata, IRCCS Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II", Bari, Italy
| | - Anila Kardhashi
- S.S.D. Ginecologia Oncologica Clinicizzata, IRCCS Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II", Bari, Italy
| | - Gennaro Cormio
- S.S.D. Ginecologia Oncologica Clinicizzata, IRCCS Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II", Bari, Italy
- Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine (DIM), University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Biegała Ł, Gajek A, Szymczak-Pajor I, Marczak A, Śliwińska A, Rogalska A. Targeted inhibition of the ATR/CHK1 pathway overcomes resistance to olaparib and dysregulates DNA damage response protein expression in BRCA2 MUT ovarian cancer cells. Sci Rep 2023; 13:22659. [PMID: 38114660 PMCID: PMC10730696 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-50151-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2023] [Accepted: 12/15/2023] [Indexed: 12/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Olaparib is a PARP inhibitor (PARPi) approved for targeted treatment of ovarian cancer (OC). However, its efficacy is impeded by the inevitable occurrence of resistance. Here, we investigated whether the cytotoxic activity of olaparib could be synergistically enhanced in olaparib-resistant OC cells with BRCA2 reversion mutation by the addition of inhibitors of the ATR/CHK1 pathway. Moreover, we provide insights into alterations in the DNA damage response (DDR) pathway induced by combination treatments. Antitumor activity of olaparib alone or combined with an ATR inhibitor (ATRi, ceralasertib) or CHK1 inhibitor (CHK1i, MK-8776) was evaluated in OC cell lines sensitive (PEO1, PEO4) and resistant (PEO1-OR) to olaparib. Antibody microarrays were used to explore changes in expression of 27 DDR-related proteins. Olaparib in combination with ATR/CHK1 inhibitors synergistically induced a decrease in viability and clonogenic survival and an increase in apoptosis mediated by caspase-3/7 in all OC cells. Combination treatments induced cumulative alterations in expression of DDR-related proteins mediating distinct DNA repair pathways and cell cycle control. In the presence of ATRi and CHK1i, olaparib-induced upregulation of proteins determining cell fate after DNA damage (PARP1, CHK1, c-Abl, Ku70, Ku80, MDM2, and p21) was abrogated in PEO1-OR cells. Overall, the addition of ATRi or CHK1i to olaparib effectively overcomes resistance to PARPi exerting anti-proliferative effect in BRCA2MUT olaparib-resistant OC cells and alters expression of DDR-related proteins. These new molecular insights into cellular response to olaparib combined with ATR/CHK1 inhibitors might help improve targeted therapies for olaparib-resistant OC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Łukasz Biegała
- Department of Medical Biophysics, Institute of Biophysics, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, University of Lodz, 141/143 Pomorska Street, 90-236, Lodz, Poland
- Doctoral School of Exact and Natural Sciences, University of Lodz, 21/23 Jana Matejki Street, 90-237, Lodz, Poland
| | - Arkadiusz Gajek
- Department of Medical Biophysics, Institute of Biophysics, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, University of Lodz, 141/143 Pomorska Street, 90-236, Lodz, Poland
| | - Izabela Szymczak-Pajor
- Department of Nucleic Acid Biochemistry, Medical University of Lodz, 251 Pomorska Street, 92-213, Lodz, Poland
| | - Agnieszka Marczak
- Department of Medical Biophysics, Institute of Biophysics, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, University of Lodz, 141/143 Pomorska Street, 90-236, Lodz, Poland
| | - Agnieszka Śliwińska
- Department of Nucleic Acid Biochemistry, Medical University of Lodz, 251 Pomorska Street, 92-213, Lodz, Poland
| | - Aneta Rogalska
- Department of Medical Biophysics, Institute of Biophysics, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, University of Lodz, 141/143 Pomorska Street, 90-236, Lodz, Poland.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kotsopoulos J, Hathaway CA, Narod SA, Teras LR, Patel AV, Hu C, Yadav S, Couch FJ, Tworoger SS. Germline Mutations in 12 Genes and Risk of Ovarian Cancer in Three Population-Based Cohorts. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2023; 32:1402-1410. [PMID: 37493628 PMCID: PMC10592229 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-23-0041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2023] [Revised: 06/23/2023] [Accepted: 07/24/2023] [Indexed: 07/27/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND With the widespread use of multigene panel genetic testing, population-based studies are necessary to accurately assess penetrance in unselected individuals. We evaluated the prevalence of germline pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants (mutations) in 12 cancer-predisposition genes and associations with ovarian cancer risk in three population-based prospective studies [Nurses' Health Study (NHS), NHSII, Cancer Prevention Study II]. METHODS We included women with epithelial ovarian or peritoneal cancer (n = 776) and controls who were alive and had at least one intact ovary at the time of the matched case diagnosis (n = 1,509). Germline DNA was sequenced for mutations in 12 genes. Conditional logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for ovarian cancer risk by mutation status. RESULTS The mutation frequency across all 12 genes was 11.2% in cases and 3.3% in controls (P < 0.0001). BRCA1 and BRCA2 were the most frequently mutated (3.5% and 3.8% of cases and 0.3% and 0.5% of controls, respectively) and were associated with increased ovarian cancer risk [OR, BRCA1 = 12.38; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 4.72-32.45; OR, BRCA2 = 9.18; 95% CI = 3.98-21.15]. Mutation frequencies for the other genes were ≤1.0% and only PALB2 was significantly associated with risk (OR = 5.79; 95% CI = 1.09-30.83). There was no difference in survival for women with a BRCA germline mutation versus no mutation. CONCLUSIONS Further research is needed to better understand the role of other mutations in ovarian cancer among unselected populations. IMPACT Our data support guidelines for germline genetic testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2 among women diagnosed with epithelial ovarian cancer; testing for PALB2 may be warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanne Kotsopoulos
- Women’s College Research Institute, Women’s College Hospital, 76 Grenville St, 6 Floor, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, 155 College Street Health Science Building, 6 Floor, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Steven A. Narod
- Women’s College Research Institute, Women’s College Hospital, 76 Grenville St, 6 Floor, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, 155 College Street Health Science Building, 6 Floor, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Lauren R. Teras
- Department of Population Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Alpa V. Patel
- Department of Population Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Chunling Hu
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | - Fergus J. Couch
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Flaum N, Bowes J, Smith MJ, Crosbie EJ, Edmondson R, Lophatananon A, Evans DG. Optimization of polygenic risk scores in BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant heterozygotes in epithelial ovarian cancer. Genet Med 2023; 25:100898. [PMID: 37212253 DOI: 10.1016/j.gim.2023.100898] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2022] [Revised: 05/16/2023] [Accepted: 05/16/2023] [Indexed: 05/23/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE A third of familial epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is explained by BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants. Polygenic risk scores (PRSs) for BRCA1/2 heterozygotes associated with EOC have been created, but impact of combination with clinical and hormonal risk factors is unclear. METHODS We genotyped 300 cases and 355 controls and constructed modified PRSs based on those validated by Barnes et al. Model discrimination and EOC risk was assessed by area under the curve (AUC) values and difference between lowest and highest quintile odds ratios (ORs). We investigated model optimization using logistic regression to combine models with clinical and hormonal data. RESULTS Unadjusted AUC values ranged from 0.526 to 0.551 with 2.2- to 2.3-fold increase in OR between lowest and highest quintiles (BRCA1 heterozygotes) and 0.574 to 0.585 AUC values with a 6.3- to 7.7-fold increase (BRCA2 heterozygotes). The optimized model (parity, age at menarche, menopause, and first full-term pregnancy) estimated AUC values of 0.872 to 0.876 and 21- to 23-fold increase in OR (BRCA1 heterozygotes) and AUC values of 0.857 to 0.867 and 40- to 41-fold increase (BRCA2 heterozygotes). CONCLUSION The combination of PRS with age, family history, and hormonal factors significantly improved the EOC risk discrimination ability. However, the contribution of the PRS was small. Larger prospective studies are needed to assess if combined-PRS models could provide information to inform risk-reducing decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola Flaum
- Division of Evolution, Infection and Genomics, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom; North West Genomics Laboratory Hub, Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St. Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom.
| | - John Bowes
- Division of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Miriam J Smith
- Division of Evolution, Infection and Genomics, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom; North West Genomics Laboratory Hub, Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St. Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Emma J Crosbie
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom; Division of Gynaecology, St. Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Richard Edmondson
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom; Division of Gynaecology, St. Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Artitaya Lophatananon
- Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - D Gareth Evans
- Division of Evolution, Infection and Genomics, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom; North West Genomics Laboratory Hub, Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St. Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom; Prevention Breast Cancer Centre and Nightingale Breast Screening Centre, University Hospital of South Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; Manchester Breast Centre, Manchester Cancer Research Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ferreyra Y, Rosas G, Cock-Rada AM, Araujo J, Bravo L, Doimi F, Casas J, Clavo MDLÁ, Pinto JA, Belmar-López C. Landscape of germline BRCA1/BRCA2 variants in breast and ovarian cancer in Peru. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1227864. [PMID: 37664050 PMCID: PMC10470619 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1227864] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2023] [Accepted: 07/27/2023] [Indexed: 09/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background There is an increasing amount of data from Latin America on the characterization of BRCA variants; however, there is limited information from Peru. We conducted a retrospective study to describe germline pathogenic/likely pathogenic(P/LP) variants and variants of uncertain/unknown significance (VUS) in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in Peru, in patients with breast and ovarian cancer, candidates for treatment with poly (adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors. Methods The patients were evaluated during the period 2019-2021. Genomic DNA was isolated from peripheral blood samples and targeted sequencing was performed using the Ampliseq BRCA panel. Genetic variant interpretation was carried out in accordance with the recommendations of the American College of Medical Genetics and ClinVar. During this period, 525 patients (143 with breast cancer and 382 with ovarian cancer) were studied. Results We found that 14.7% (21/143) of breast cancer patients and 20.7% (79/382) of ovarian cancer patients were carriers of P/LP variants in BRCA1/2. The most frequent pathogenic variants detected in BRCA1 were c.2105dupT (BIC: 2224insT, n=12, 18.75%), c.68_69delAG (BIC: 185delAG, n=6, 9.38%), c.140G>T and c.815_824dupAGCCATGTGG (n=5, 7.81%), while in BRCA2 were c.8023A>G (n=6, 16.67%), c.6024dupG (BIC: 6252insG, n=4, 11.11%), and c.9235delG (BIC: 9463delG, n=3, 8.33%). Regarding VUS, we found that 6.99% (10/143) of breast cancer patients and 7.33% (28/382) of ovarian cancer patients were carriers of a VUS in BRCA1/2. For BRCA1, the most frequent VUS was c.93C>G (n=2), and for BRCA2, c.5465A>T (n=4), c.3101T>C (n=3), c.205C>A and c.437T>C (n=2). Conclusion We found a frequency of 14.7% germline mutations in breast cancer patients and 20.7% in ovarian cancer patients. The most recurrent mutations were BRCA1 c.2105dupT and BRCA2 c.8023A>G. We found that BRCA2 c.8023A>G, c.6024dupG, and c.9235delG were not previously reported in Peruvian patients. BRCA1 c.2344dupA is a novel mutation that has not been previously reported in any database. The frequency of VUS in our cohort was 7.2%.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yomali Ferreyra
- Departamento de Bioingeniería, Universidad de Ingenieria y Tecnología, Lima, Peru
| | - Gina Rosas
- Departamento de Patología, Insituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas, Lima, Peru
| | - Alicia M. Cock-Rada
- Departmento de Oncología Médica, Instituto de Cancerología Las Américas - Auna, Medellín, Colombia
| | - Jhajaira Araujo
- Centro de Investigación Básicas y traslacional, Auna Ideas, Lima, Peru
| | - Leny Bravo
- Escuela Profesional de Medicina Humana-Filial Ica, Universidad Privada San Juan Bautista, Ica, Peru
| | | | | | | | - Joseph A. Pinto
- Centro de Investigación Básicas y traslacional, Auna Ideas, Lima, Peru
| | - Carolina Belmar-López
- Escuela Profesional de Medicina Humana-Filial Ica, Universidad Privada San Juan Bautista, Ica, Peru
- Oncogenomics, Auna, Lima, Peru
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Chen Y, Gutierrez V, Morris L, Marti JL. Diagnostic Scrutiny and Patterns of Elevated Cancer Risk: Uncovering Overdiagnosis Through Standardized Incidence Ratios. Cureus 2023; 15:e42439. [PMID: 37637595 PMCID: PMC10447997 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.42439] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/24/2023] [Indexed: 08/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Certain medical diagnoses and environmental or occupational exposures may be associated with elevated risk of cancer diagnosis, either through causal mechanisms or via increased detection of a subclinical reservoir through increased diagnostic scrutiny (overdiagnosis). The present study aimed to investigate the distribution of elevated cancer risks associated with different diagnoses and exposures. A systematic literature search was conducted to identify studies published in the last 30 years that examined the standardized incidence ratio (SIR) associated with exposures and risk factors. Meta-SIRs for each cancer type were calculated. The distribution of elevated cancer risks was then compared between cancer types previously reported to be susceptible to overdiagnosis and those that have not been associated with overdiagnosis. The review of 108 studies identified four patterns: SIR generally elevated for 1) only overdiagnosis-susceptible cancer types, 2) both overdiagnosed and non-overdiagnosed cancer types, 3) select cancers in accordance with risk factor or exposure, and 4) SIRs that did not exhibit a distinct increase in any cancer type. The distribution of elevated cancer risks may serve as a signature of whether the underlying risk factor or exposure is a carcinogenic process or a mechanism of increased diagnostic scrutiny uncovering clinically occult diseases. The identification of increased cancer risk should be viewed with caution, and analyzing the pattern of elevated cancer risk distribution can potentially reveal conditions that appear to be cancer risk factors but are in fact the result of exposure to medical surveillance or other healthcare activities that lead to the detection of indolent tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yunchan Chen
- Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, USA
| | | | - Luc Morris
- Head and Neck Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - Jennifer L Marti
- Division of Breast Surgical Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Casalino S, Bruce S, Serfas K, Altman AD, Kean S, Lambert P, McManus KJ, Hartley JN, Nachtigal MW. Exploring the role of a multidisciplinary hereditary gynecologic oncology clinic in epithelial ovarian cancer risk-reducing surgical decision-making practices: A mixed-methods study. J Genet Couns 2023; 32:728-743. [PMID: 36808790 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1684] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2022] [Revised: 12/01/2022] [Accepted: 01/16/2023] [Indexed: 02/22/2023]
Abstract
Individuals that have gynecologic reproductive organs with pathogenic variants in BRCA1 or BRCA2 ("BRCA-positive") have an increased risk of developing high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC). The majority of HGSOC develops in the fallopian tubes and later spreads to the ovaries and peritoneal cavity. Therefore, risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) is recommended for those who are BRCA-positive to preventatively remove their ovaries and fallopian tubes. The Hereditary Gynecology Clinic (HGC) is a provincial program in Winnipeg, Canada, that specifically targets care to the unique needs of such individuals through an interdisciplinary team of gynecological oncologists, menopause specialists, and registered nurses. A mixed-methods study design was used to explore the decision-making processes of these BRCA-positive individuals who have been recommended (or who completed) RRSO and experiences with healthcare providers at the HGC influenced this decision. Individuals who are BRCA-positive without a previous diagnosis of HGSOC and who had previously received genetic counselling were recruited from the HGC and the provincial cancer genetics program (Shared Health Program of Genetics & Metabolism). Forty-three people completed a survey and 15 participated in an in-depth interview about their experiences and decisions surrounding RRSO. Surveys were analyzed to compare scores on validated scales related to decision-making and cancer-related worry. Qualitative interviews were transcribed, coded, and analyzed using interpretive description. Participants described the complex decisions faced by those who are BRCA-positive, which are intertwined with life experiences and circumstances including age, marital status, and family disease history. Participants interpreted their HGSOC risk through a personalized "lens" of contextual factors that impacted perceptions about the practical and emotional implications of RRSO and the need for surgery. Mean scores on validated scales evaluating the HGC's impact on decisional outcomes and preparedness for decision-making about RRSO were not significant, indicating that the HGC played a supportive role, rather than helping with decision-making itself. Therefore, we present a novel framework that consolidates the various influences on decision-making and connects them to the psychological and practical implications of RRSO in the context of the HGC. Strategies for improving support, decisional outcomes, and the overall experiences of individuals who are BRCA-positive attending the HGC are also described.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Selina Casalino
- Biochemistry and Medical Genetics, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
- Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sharon Bruce
- Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Kim Serfas
- Shared Health Program of Genetics and Metabolism, Health Sciences Centre, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Alon D Altman
- Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
- CancerCare Manitoba Research Institute, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Sarah Kean
- Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
- CancerCare Manitoba Research Institute, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Pascal Lambert
- CancerCare Manitoba Research Institute, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
- Epidemiology and Cancer Registry, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Kirk J McManus
- Biochemistry and Medical Genetics, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
- CancerCare Manitoba Research Institute, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Jessica N Hartley
- Biochemistry and Medical Genetics, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Mark W Nachtigal
- Biochemistry and Medical Genetics, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
- Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
- CancerCare Manitoba Research Institute, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
O'Mahony DG, Ramus SJ, Southey MC, Meagher NS, Hadjisavvas A, John EM, Hamann U, Imyanitov EN, Andrulis IL, Sharma P, Daly MB, Hake CR, Weitzel JN, Jakubowska A, Godwin AK, Arason A, Bane A, Simard J, Soucy P, Caligo MA, Mai PL, Claes KBM, Teixeira MR, Chung WK, Lazaro C, Hulick PJ, Toland AE, Pedersen IS, Neuhausen SL, Vega A, de la Hoya M, Nevanlinna H, Dhawan M, Zampiga V, Danesi R, Varesco L, Gismondi V, Vellone VG, James PA, Janavicius R, Nikitina-Zake L, Nielsen FC, van Overeem Hansen T, Pejovic T, Borg A, Rantala J, Offit K, Montagna M, Nathanson KL, Domchek SM, Osorio A, García MJ, Karlan BY, De Fazio A, Bowtell D, McGuffog L, Leslie G, Parsons MT, Dörk T, Speith LM, Dos Santos ES, da Costa AABA, Radice P, Peterlongo P, Papi L, Engel C, Hahnen E, Schmutzler RK, Wappenschmidt B, Easton DF, Tischkowitz M, Singer CF, Tan YY, Whittemore AS, Sieh W, Brenton JD, Yannoukakos D, Fostira F, Konstantopoulou I, Soukupova J, Vocka M, Chenevix-Trench G, Pharoah PDP, Antoniou AC, Goldgar DE, Spurdle AB, Michailidou K. Ovarian cancer pathology characteristics as predictors of variant pathogenicity in BRCA1 and BRCA2. Br J Cancer 2023; 128:2283-2294. [PMID: 37076566 PMCID: PMC10241792 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-023-02263-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2022] [Revised: 02/22/2023] [Accepted: 03/24/2023] [Indexed: 04/21/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The distribution of ovarian tumour characteristics differs between germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variant carriers and non-carriers. In this study, we assessed the utility of ovarian tumour characteristics as predictors of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variant pathogenicity, for application using the American College of Medical Genetics and the Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG/AMP) variant classification system. METHODS Data for 10,373 ovarian cancer cases, including carriers and non-carriers of BRCA1 or BRCA2 pathogenic variants, were collected from unpublished international cohorts and consortia and published studies. Likelihood ratios (LR) were calculated for the association of ovarian cancer histology and other characteristics, with BRCA1 and BRCA2 variant pathogenicity. Estimates were aligned to ACMG/AMP code strengths (supporting, moderate, strong). RESULTS No histological subtype provided informative ACMG/AMP evidence in favour of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variant pathogenicity. Evidence against variant pathogenicity was estimated for the mucinous and clear cell histologies (supporting) and borderline cases (moderate). Refined associations are provided according to tumour grade, invasion and age at diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS We provide detailed estimates for predicting BRCA1 and BRCA2 variant pathogenicity based on ovarian tumour characteristics. This evidence can be combined with other variant information under the ACMG/AMP classification system, to improve classification and carrier clinical management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Denise G O'Mahony
- Biostatistics Unit, The Cyprus Institute of Neurology and Genetics, Nicosia, 2371, Cyprus
- Department of Cancer Genetics, Therapeutics and Ultrastructural Pathology, The Cyprus Institute of Neurology and Genetics, Nicosia, 2371, Cyprus
| | - Susan J Ramus
- School of Clinical Medicine, University of New South Wales Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia
- Adult Cancer Program, Lowy Cancer Research Centre, University of New South Wales Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia
| | - Melissa C Southey
- Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, 3168, Australia
- Department of Clinical Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, 3010, Australia
- Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia
| | - Nicola S Meagher
- School of Clinical Medicine, University of New South Wales Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia
- Adult Cancer Program, Lowy Cancer Research Centre, University of New South Wales Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Andreas Hadjisavvas
- Department of Cancer Genetics, Therapeutics and Ultrastructural Pathology, The Cyprus Institute of Neurology and Genetics, Nicosia, 2371, Cyprus
| | - Esther M John
- Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
- Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94304, USA
| | - Ute Hamann
- Molecular Genetics of Breast Cancer, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, 69120, Germany
| | | | - Irene L Andrulis
- Fred A. Litwin Center for Cancer Genetics, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute of Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, M5G 1×5, Canada
- Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5S 1A8, Canada
| | - Priyanka Sharma
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Westwood, KS, 66205, USA
| | - Mary B Daly
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, 19111, USA
| | | | | | - Anna Jakubowska
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, 171-252, Poland
- Independent Laboratory of Molecular Biology and Genetic Diagnostics, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, 171-252, Poland
| | - Andrew K Godwin
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, 66160, USA
| | - Adalgeir Arason
- Department of Pathology, Landspitali University Hospital, Reykjavik, 101, Iceland
- BMC (Biomedical Centre), Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, 101, Iceland
| | - Anita Bane
- Department of Pathology & Molecular Medicine, Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, L8V 1C3, Canada
| | - Jacques Simard
- Genomics Center, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec - Université Laval Research Center, Québec City, QC, G1V 4G2, Canada
| | - Penny Soucy
- Genomics Center, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec - Université Laval Research Center, Québec City, QC, G1V 4G2, Canada
| | - Maria A Caligo
- SOD Genetica Molecolare, University Hospital, Pisa, 56126, Italy
| | - Phuong L Mai
- Magee-Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA
| | | | - Manuel R Teixeira
- Department of Laboratory Genetics, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto)/Comprehensive Cancer Center, Porto, 4200-072, Portugal
- School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences Institute (ICBAS), University of Porto, Porto, 4050-013, Portugal
| | - Wendy K Chung
- Departments of Pediatrics and Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY, 10032, USA
| | - Conxi Lazaro
- Hereditary Cancer Program, ONCOBELL-IDIBELL-IGTP, Catalan Institute of Oncology, CIBERONC, Barcelona, 08908, Spain
| | - Peter J Hulick
- Center for Medical Genetics, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL, 60201, USA
- The University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA
| | - Amanda E Toland
- Department of Cancer Biology and Genetics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA
| | - Inge Sokilde Pedersen
- Molecular Diagnostics, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, 9000, Denmark
- Clinical Cancer Research Center, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, 9000, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, 9000, Denmark
| | - Susan L Neuhausen
- Department of Population Sciences, Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, Duarte, CA, 91010, USA
| | - Ana Vega
- Centro de Investigación en Red de Enfermedades Raras (CIBERER), Madrid, 28029, Spain
- Fundación Pública Galega de Medicina Xenómica, Santiago de Compostela, 15706, Spain
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago, SERGAS, Santiago de Compostela, 15706, Spain
| | - Miguel de la Hoya
- Molecular Oncology Laboratory, CIBERONC, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, IdISSC (Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos), Madrid, 28040, Spain
| | - Heli Nevanlinna
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, 00290, Finland
| | - Mallika Dhawan
- Cancer Genetics and Prevention Program, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, 94143-1714, USA
| | - Valentina Zampiga
- Biosciences Laboratory, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Meldola, Italy
| | - Rita Danesi
- Romagna Cancer Registry, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Meldola, 47014, Italy
| | - Liliana Varesco
- Unit of Hereditary Cancer, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, 16132, Italy
| | - Viviana Gismondi
- Unit of Hereditary Cancer, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, 16132, Italy
| | | | - Paul A James
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ribeirao Preto Medical School, University of Sao Paulo, Ribeirao Preto, 14049-900, Brazil
| | - Ramunas Janavicius
- Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Department of Human and Medical Genetics, Vilnius University, Vilnius, LT-03101, Lithuania
- State Research Institute Centre for Innovative Medicine, Vilnius, 8410, Lithuania
| | | | - Finn Cilius Nielsen
- Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, DK-2100, Denmark
| | - Thomas van Overeem Hansen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, DK-2100, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, , University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, 2200, Denmark
| | - Tanja Pejovic
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, 97239, USA
- Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, 97239, USA
| | - Ake Borg
- Department of Oncology, Lund University and Skåne University Hospital, Lund, 222 41, Sweden
| | - Johanna Rantala
- Clinical Genetics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, 171 76, Sweden
| | - Kenneth Offit
- Clinical Genetics Research Lab, Department of Cancer Biology and Genetics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA
- Clinical Genetics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Marco Montagna
- Immunology and Molecular Oncology Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV - IRCCS, Padua, 35128, Italy
| | - Katherine L Nathanson
- Basser Center for BRCA, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19066, USA
| | - Susan M Domchek
- Basser Center for BRCA, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19066, USA
| | - Ana Osorio
- Human Genetics Group, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Madrid, 28029, Spain
- Centre for Biomedical Network Research on Rare Diseases (CIBERER), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, 28029, Spain
- Genetics Service, Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, 28040, Spain
| | - María J García
- Computational Oncology Group, Structural Biology Programme, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Madrid, 28029, Spain
| | - Beth Y Karlan
- David Geffen School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA
| | - Anna De Fazio
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Sydney, Australia
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, 2145, Australia
- The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2145, Australia
| | - David Bowtell
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia
| | - Lesley McGuffog
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB1 8RN, UK
| | - Goska Leslie
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB1 8RN, UK
| | - Michael T Parsons
- Population Health Program, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, 4006, Australia
| | - Thilo Dörk
- Gynaecology Research Unit, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, 30625, Germany
| | - Lisa-Marie Speith
- Gynaecology Research Unit, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, 30625, Germany
| | - Elizabeth Santana Dos Santos
- Service de Génétique, Institut Curie, Paris, 75005, France
- Oncology Center, Hospital Sirio-Libanes, São Paulo, 01308-050, Brazil
- Department of Clinical Oncology, A.C.Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, 1509900, Brazil
| | - Alexandre André B A da Costa
- Department of Clinical Oncology, A.C.Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, 1509900, Brazil
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, 2215, USA
| | - Paolo Radice
- Unit of Preventive Medicine: Molecular Bases of Genetic Risk, Department of Experimental Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori (INT), Milan, 20133, Italy
| | - Paolo Peterlongo
- Genome Diagnostics Program, IFOM ETS - the AIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology, Milan, 20139, Italy
| | - Laura Papi
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences 'Mario Serio', Medical Genetics Unit, University of Florence, Florence, 27571, Italy
| | - Christoph Engel
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, 04107, Germany
- LIFE - Leipzig Research Centre for Civilization Diseases, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, 04103, Germany
| | - Eric Hahnen
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, 50937, Germany
- Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, 50937, Germany
| | - Rita K Schmutzler
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, 50937, Germany
- Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, 50937, Germany
- Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne (CMMC), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, 50931, Germany
| | - Barbara Wappenschmidt
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, 50937, Germany
- Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, 50937, Germany
| | - Douglas F Easton
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB1 8RN, UK
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB1 8RN, UK
| | - Marc Tischkowitz
- Program in Cancer Genetics, Departments of Human Genetics and Oncology, McGill University, Montréal, QC, H4A 3J1, Canada
- Department of Medical Genetics, National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Christian F Singer
- Department of OB/GYN and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, 1090, Austria
| | - Yen Yen Tan
- Department of OB/GYN and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, 1090, Austria
| | - Alice S Whittemore
- Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
- Department of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
| | - Weiva Sieh
- Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, 10029, USA
- Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, 10029, USA
| | - James D Brenton
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0RE, UK
| | - Drakoulis Yannoukakos
- Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory, INRASTES, National Centre for Scientific Research 'Demokritos', Athens, 15310, Greece
| | - Florentia Fostira
- Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory, INRASTES, National Centre for Scientific Research 'Demokritos', Athens, 15310, Greece
| | - Irene Konstantopoulou
- Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory, INRASTES, National Centre for Scientific Research 'Demokritos', Athens, 15310, Greece
| | - Jana Soukupova
- Institute of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Diagnostics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, 12000, Czech Republic
| | - Michal Vocka
- Department of Oncology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, 12000, Czech Republic
| | - Georgia Chenevix-Trench
- Department of Genetics and Computational Biology, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, 4006, Australia
| | - Paul D P Pharoah
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB1 8RN, UK
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB1 8RN, UK
| | - Antonis C Antoniou
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB1 8RN, UK
| | - David E Goldgar
- Department of Dermatology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
| | - Amanda B Spurdle
- Population Health Program, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, 4006, Australia
| | - Kyriaki Michailidou
- Biostatistics Unit, The Cyprus Institute of Neurology and Genetics, Nicosia, 2371, Cyprus.
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB1 8RN, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Azzollini J, Agnelli L, Conca E, Torelli T, Busico A, Capone I, Angelini M, Tamborini E, Perrone F, Vingiani A, Lorenzini D, Peissel B, Pruneri G, Manoukian S. Prevalence of BRCA homopolymeric indels in an ION Torrent-based tumour-to-germline testing workflow in high-grade ovarian carcinoma. Sci Rep 2023; 13:7781. [PMID: 37179432 PMCID: PMC10182972 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-33857-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2023] [Accepted: 04/20/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Tumour DNA sequencing is essential for precision medicine since it guides therapeutic decisions but also fosters the identification of patients who may benefit from germline testing. Notwithstanding, the tumour-to-germline testing workflow presents a few caveats. The low sensitivity for indels at loci with sequences of identical bases (homopolymers) of ion semiconductor-based sequencing techniques represents a well-known limitation, but the prevalence of indels overlooked by these techniques in high-risk populations has not been investigated. In our study, we addressed this issue at the homopolymeric regions of BRCA1/2 in a retrospectively selected cohort of 157 patients affected with high-grade ovarian cancer and negative at tumour testing by ION Torrent sequencing. Variant allele frequency (VAF) of indels at each of the 29 investigated homopolymers was systematically revised with the IGV software. Thresholds to discriminate putative germline variants were defined by scaling the VAF to a normal distribution and calculating the outliers that exceeded the mean + 3 median-adjusted deviations of a control population. Sanger sequencing of the outliers confirmed the occurrence of only one of the five putative indels in both tumour and blood from a patient with a family history of breast cancer. Our results indicated that the prevalence of homopolymeric indels overlooked by ion semiconductor techniques is seemingly low. A careful evaluation of clinical and family history data would further help minimise this technique-bound limitation, highlighting cases in which a deeper look at these regions would be recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacopo Azzollini
- Unit of Medical Genetics, Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, via Venezian 1, 20133, Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Agnelli
- Department of Advanced Diagnostics, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, via Venezian 1, 20133, Milan, Italy
- Medical Oncology 1 Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, via Venezian 1, 20133, Milan, Italy
| | - Elena Conca
- Department of Advanced Diagnostics, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, via Venezian 1, 20133, Milan, Italy
| | - Tommaso Torelli
- Department of Advanced Diagnostics, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, via Venezian 1, 20133, Milan, Italy
- Medical Oncology 1 Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, via Venezian 1, 20133, Milan, Italy
| | - Adele Busico
- Department of Advanced Diagnostics, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, via Venezian 1, 20133, Milan, Italy
| | - Iolanda Capone
- Department of Advanced Diagnostics, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, via Venezian 1, 20133, Milan, Italy
| | - Marta Angelini
- Department of Advanced Diagnostics, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, via Venezian 1, 20133, Milan, Italy
| | - Elena Tamborini
- Department of Advanced Diagnostics, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, via Venezian 1, 20133, Milan, Italy
| | - Federica Perrone
- Department of Advanced Diagnostics, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, via Venezian 1, 20133, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Vingiani
- Department of Advanced Diagnostics, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, via Venezian 1, 20133, Milan, Italy
- Oncology and Hemato-Oncology Department, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Daniele Lorenzini
- Department of Advanced Diagnostics, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, via Venezian 1, 20133, Milan, Italy
| | - Bernard Peissel
- Unit of Medical Genetics, Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, via Venezian 1, 20133, Milan, Italy
| | - Giancarlo Pruneri
- Department of Advanced Diagnostics, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, via Venezian 1, 20133, Milan, Italy
- Oncology and Hemato-Oncology Department, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Siranoush Manoukian
- Unit of Medical Genetics, Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, via Venezian 1, 20133, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Prokofyeva DS, Mingazheva ET, Valova YV, Sakaeva DD, Faishanova RR, Nurgalieva AK, Valiev RR, Bogdanova N, Dörk T, Khusnutdinova EK. Targeted next-generation sequencing of 21 candidate genes in hereditary ovarian cancer patients from the Republic of Bashkortostan. J Ovarian Res 2023; 16:66. [PMID: 37013556 PMCID: PMC10071671 DOI: 10.1186/s13048-023-01119-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2020] [Accepted: 02/14/2023] [Indexed: 04/05/2023] Open
Abstract
About 5-10% of all ovarian cancer cases show familial clustering, and some 15-25% of familial ovarian cancer cases are mediated by high-penetrance mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. Only few other genes have been identified for familial ovarian cancer.We conducted targeted next-generation sequencing of the protein coding region of 21 candidate genes, including UTR regions, in genomic DNA samples of 48 patients with familial ovarian cancer from the Republic of Bashkortostan. We identified deleterious variants in BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2, MSH6 and NBN in a total of 16 patients (33%). The NBN truncating variant, p.W143X, had not previously been reported. Seven patients (15%) were carriers of the c.5266dupC variant in BRCA1, supporting a Russian origin of this founder allele. An additional 15 variants of uncertain clinical significance were observed. We conclude that our gene panel explains about one-third of familial ovarian cancer risk in the Republic of Bashkortostan.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D S Prokofyeva
- Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education, Ufa University of Science and Technology, Ufa, 450076, Russia.
| | - E T Mingazheva
- Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education, Ufa University of Science and Technology, Ufa, 450076, Russia
| | - Ya V Valova
- Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education, Ufa University of Science and Technology, Ufa, 450076, Russia
| | - D D Sakaeva
- Ministry of Health of the Republic of Bashkortostan State Autonomous Healthcare Institution, Republican Clinical Oncology Center, Ufa, 450008, Russia
| | - R R Faishanova
- Ministry of Health of the Republic of Bashkortostan State Autonomous Healthcare Institution, Republican Clinical Oncology Center, Ufa, 450008, Russia
| | - A Kh Nurgalieva
- Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education, Ufa University of Science and Technology, Ufa, 450076, Russia
| | - R R Valiev
- Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education, Ufa University of Science and Technology, Ufa, 450076, Russia
| | - N Bogdanova
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hannover Medical School, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - T Dörk
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hannover Medical School, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
| | - E K Khusnutdinova
- Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education, Ufa University of Science and Technology, Ufa, 450076, Russia
- Institute of Biochemistry and Genetics, Ufa Federal Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Ufa, 450054, Russia
- Ministry of Health of the Republic of Bashkortostan State Autonomous Healthcare Institution, Republican Clinical Oncology Center, Ufa, 450008, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Mitric C, Salman L, Abrahamyan L, Kim SR, Pechlivanoglou P, Chan KKW, Gien LT, Ferguson SE. Mismatch-repair deficiency, microsatellite instability, and lynch syndrome in ovarian cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Gynecol Oncol 2023; 170:133-142. [PMID: 36682091 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.12.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2022] [Revised: 12/12/2022] [Accepted: 12/14/2022] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Investigating for mismatch repair protein deficiency (MMRd), microsatellite instability (MSI), and Lynch syndrome (LS) is widely accepted in endometrial cancer, but knowledge is limited on its value in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). The primary objective was to evaluate the prevalence of mismatch repair protein deficiency (MMRd), microsatellite instability (MSI)-high, and Lynch syndrome (LS) in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), as well as the diagnostic accuracy of LS screening tests. The secondary objective was to determine the prevalence of MMRd, MSI-high, and LS in synchronous ovarian endometrial cancer and in histological subtypes. METHODS We systematically searched the MEDLINE, Epub Ahead of Print, MEDLINE In-Process and Other Non-Indexed Citations, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Embase databases. We included studies analysing MMR, MSI, and/or LS by sequencing. RESULTS A total of 55 studies were included. The prevalence of MMRd, MSI-high, and LS in EOC was 6% (95% confidence interval (CI) 5-8%), 13% (95% CI 12-15%), and 2% (95% CI 1-3%) respectively. Hypermethylation was present in 76% of patients with MLH1 deficiency (95% CI 64-84%). The MMRd prevalence was highest in endometrioid (12%) followed by non-serous non-mucinous (9%) and lowest in serous (1%) histological subtypes. MSI-high prevalence was highest in endometrioid (12%) and non-serous non-mucinous (12%) and lowest in serous (9%) histological subtypes. Synchronous and endometrioid EOC had the highest prevalence of LS pathogenic variants at 7% and 3% respectively, with serous having lowest prevalence (1%). Synchronous ovarian and endometrial cancers had highest rates of MMRd (28%) and MSI-high (28%). Sensitivity was highest for IHC (91.1%) and IHC with MSI (92.8%), while specificity was highest for IHC with methylation (92.3%). CONCLUSION MMRd and germline LS testing should be considered for non-serous non-mucinous EOC, particularly for endometrioid. PRECIS The rates of mismatch repair deficiency, microsatellite instability high, and mismatch repair germline mutations are highest in endometrioid subtype and non-serous non-mucinous ovarian cancer. The rates are lowest in serous histologic subtype.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristina Mitric
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University Health Network and Sinai Health System, Toronto, Canada; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Lina Salman
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University Health Network and Sinai Health System, Toronto, Canada; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Lusine Abrahamyan
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (IHPME), University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Soyoun Rachel Kim
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University Health Network and Sinai Health System, Toronto, Canada; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Petros Pechlivanoglou
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (IHPME), University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Kelvin K W Chan
- Division of Medical Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada; Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Lilian T Gien
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (IHPME), University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Sarah E Ferguson
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University Health Network and Sinai Health System, Toronto, Canada; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Ovejero-Sánchez M, González-Sarmiento R, Herrero AB. DNA Damage Response Alterations in Ovarian Cancer: From Molecular Mechanisms to Therapeutic Opportunities. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:448. [PMID: 36672401 PMCID: PMC9856346 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15020448] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2022] [Revised: 01/03/2023] [Accepted: 01/04/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
The DNA damage response (DDR), a set of signaling pathways for DNA damage detection and repair, maintains genomic stability when cells are exposed to endogenous or exogenous DNA-damaging agents. Alterations in these pathways are strongly associated with cancer development, including ovarian cancer (OC), the most lethal gynecologic malignancy. In OC, failures in the DDR have been related not only to the onset but also to progression and chemoresistance. It is known that approximately half of the most frequent subtype, high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC), exhibit defects in DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair by homologous recombination (HR), and current evidence indicates that probably all HGSCs harbor a defect in at least one DDR pathway. These defects are not restricted to HGSCs; mutations in ARID1A, which are present in 30% of endometrioid OCs and 50% of clear cell (CC) carcinomas, have also been found to confer deficiencies in DNA repair. Moreover, DDR alterations have been described in a variable percentage of the different OC subtypes. Here, we overview the main DNA repair pathways involved in the maintenance of genome stability and their deregulation in OC. We also recapitulate the preclinical and clinical data supporting the potential of targeting the DDR to fight the disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- María Ovejero-Sánchez
- Institute of Biomedical Research of Salamanca (IBSAL), 37007 Salamanca, Spain
- Molecular Medicine Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Salamanca, 37007 Salamanca, Spain
- Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biology of Cancer (IBMCC), University of Salamanca-Spanish National Research Council, 37007 Salamanca, Spain
| | - Rogelio González-Sarmiento
- Institute of Biomedical Research of Salamanca (IBSAL), 37007 Salamanca, Spain
- Molecular Medicine Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Salamanca, 37007 Salamanca, Spain
- Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biology of Cancer (IBMCC), University of Salamanca-Spanish National Research Council, 37007 Salamanca, Spain
| | - Ana Belén Herrero
- Institute of Biomedical Research of Salamanca (IBSAL), 37007 Salamanca, Spain
- Molecular Medicine Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Salamanca, 37007 Salamanca, Spain
- Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biology of Cancer (IBMCC), University of Salamanca-Spanish National Research Council, 37007 Salamanca, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
DeVries AA, Dennis J, Tyrer JP, Peng PC, Coetzee SG, Reyes AL, Plummer JT, Davis BD, Chen SS, Dezem FS, Aben KKH, Anton-Culver H, Antonenkova NN, Beckmann MW, Beeghly-Fadiel A, Berchuck A, Bogdanova NV, Bogdanova-Markov N, Brenton JD, Butzow R, Campbell I, Chang-Claude J, Chenevix-Trench G, Cook LS, DeFazio A, Doherty JA, Dörk T, Eccles DM, Eliassen AH, Fasching PA, Fortner RT, Giles GG, Goode EL, Goodman MT, Gronwald J, Håkansson N, Hildebrandt MAT, Huff C, Huntsman DG, Jensen A, Kar S, Karlan BY, Khusnutdinova EK, Kiemeney LA, Kjaer SK, Kupryjanczyk J, Labrie M, Lambrechts D, Le ND, Lubiński J, May T, Menon U, Milne RL, Modugno F, Monteiro AN, Moysich KB, Odunsi K, Olsson H, Pearce CL, Pejovic T, Ramus SJ, Riboli E, Riggan MJ, Romieu I, Sandler DP, Schildkraut JM, Setiawan VW, Sieh W, Song H, Sutphen R, Terry KL, Thompson PJ, Titus L, Tworoger SS, Van Nieuwenhuysen E, Edwards DV, Webb PM, Wentzensen N, Whittemore AS, Wolk A, Wu AH, Ziogas A, Freedman ML, Lawrenson K, Pharoah PDP, Easton DF, Gayther SA, Jones MR. Copy Number Variants Are Ovarian Cancer Risk Alleles at Known and Novel Risk Loci. J Natl Cancer Inst 2022; 114:1533-1544. [PMID: 36210504 PMCID: PMC9949586 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djac160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2022] [Revised: 04/13/2022] [Accepted: 08/18/2022] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Known risk alleles for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) account for approximately 40% of the heritability for EOC. Copy number variants (CNVs) have not been investigated as EOC risk alleles in a large population cohort. METHODS Single nucleotide polymorphism array data from 13 071 EOC cases and 17 306 controls of White European ancestry were used to identify CNVs associated with EOC risk using a rare admixture maximum likelihood test for gene burden and a by-probe ratio test. We performed enrichment analysis of CNVs at known EOC risk loci and functional biofeatures in ovarian cancer-related cell types. RESULTS We identified statistically significant risk associations with CNVs at known EOC risk genes; BRCA1 (PEOC = 1.60E-21; OREOC = 8.24), RAD51C (Phigh-grade serous ovarian cancer [HGSOC] = 5.5E-4; odds ratio [OR]HGSOC = 5.74 del), and BRCA2 (PHGSOC = 7.0E-4; ORHGSOC = 3.31 deletion). Four suggestive associations (P < .001) were identified for rare CNVs. Risk-associated CNVs were enriched (P < .05) at known EOC risk loci identified by genome-wide association study. Noncoding CNVs were enriched in active promoters and insulators in EOC-related cell types. CONCLUSIONS CNVs in BRCA1 have been previously reported in smaller studies, but their observed frequency in this large population-based cohort, along with the CNVs observed at BRCA2 and RAD51C gene loci in EOC cases, suggests that these CNVs are potentially pathogenic and may contribute to the spectrum of disease-causing mutations in these genes. CNVs are likely to occur in a wider set of susceptibility regions, with potential implications for clinical genetic testing and disease prevention.
Collapse
Grants
- P01 CA017054 NCI NIH HHS
- N01 CN025403 NCI NIH HHS
- UM1 CA176726 NCI NIH HHS
- R01 CA058860 NCI NIH HHS
- P50 CA105009 NCI NIH HHS
- R01-CA122443 NIH HHS
- 076113 Wellcome Trust
- G0401527 Medical Research Council
- U19-CA148112 NCI NIH HHS
- P50 CA136393 NCI NIH HHS
- C490/A10119 C490/A10124 Cancer Research UK
- 1000143 Medical Research Council
- R01-CA54419 NIH HHS
- C8221/A19170 Cancer Research UK
- R01 CA049449 NCI NIH HHS
- P50 CA159981 NCI NIH HHS
- T32 GM118288 NIGMS NIH HHS
- CA1X01HG007491-01 NIH HHS
- Z01-ES044005 NIEHS NIH HHS
- R01 CA106414 NCI NIH HHS
- R01 CA095023 NCI NIH HHS
- N01 PC067010 NCI NIH HHS
- R01 CA058598 NCI NIH HHS
- U01 CA176726 NCI NIH HHS
- S10 RR025141 NCRR NIH HHS
- M01 RR000056 NCRR NIH HHS
- Department of Health
- 5T32GM118288-03 NIH HHS
- MR/N003284/1 Medical Research Council
- P30 CA014089 NCI NIH HHS
- K07-CA080668 NCI NIH HHS
- 14136 Cancer Research UK
- Worldwide Cancer Research
- MR_UU_12023 Medical Research Council
- R01 CA067262 NCI NIH HHS
- UM1 CA186107 NCI NIH HHS
- P30 CA015083 NCI NIH HHS
- G1000143 Medical Research Council
- R01 CA076016 NCI NIH HHS
- NHGRI NIH HHS
- P01 CA087969 NCI NIH HHS
- R01- CA61107 NCI NIH HHS
- R01-CA58598 NIH HHS
- U19 CA148112 NCI NIH HHS
- ULTR000445 NCATS NIH HHS
- R03 CA115195 NCI NIH HHS
- Wellcome Trust
- Breast Cancer Now
- R01 CA160669 NCI NIH HHS
- R01-CA058860 NIH HHS
- MC_UU_00004/01 Medical Research Council
- C570/A16491 Cancer Research UK
- R01-CA76016 NIH HHS
- R01-CA106414-A2 NIH HHS
- 001 World Health Organization
- Z01 ES049033 Intramural NIH HHS
- R01 CA126841 NCI NIH HHS
- MR/M012190/1 Medical Research Council
- 209057 Wellcome Trust
- R03 CA113148 NCI NIH HHS
- R01 CA149429 NCI NIH HHS
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences
- National Institutes of Health
- CSMC Precision Health Initiative
- Tell Every Amazing Lady About Ovarian Cancer Louisa M. McGregor Ovarian Cancer Foundation
- Ovarian Cancer Research Fund thanks
- National Cancer Institute
- National Human Genome Research Institute
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research
- Ovarian Cancer Research Fund
- European Commission’s Seventh Framework Programme
- Army Medical Research and Materiel Command
- National Health & Medical Research Council of Australia
- Cancer Councils of New South Wales, Victoria, Queensland, South Australia and Tasmania and Cancer Foundation of Western Australia
- Ovarian Cancer Australia
- Peter MacCallum Foundation
- University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
- National Kankerplan
- Breast Cancer Now, Institute of Cancer Research
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
- European Commission
- International Agency for Research on Cancer
- Danish Cancer Society
- Ligue Contre le Cancer, Institut Gustave Roussy, Mutuelle Générale de l’Education Nationale
- Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale
- German Cancer Aid; German Cancer Research Center
- Federal Ministry of Education and Research
- Hellenic Health Foundation
- Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro-AIRC-Italy
- National Research Council
- Dutch Ministry of Public Health, Welfare and Sports
- Netherlands Cancer Registry
- LK Research Funds
- Dutch Prevention Funds
- World Cancer Research Fund
- Nordforsk, Nordic Centre of Excellence programme on Food, Nutrition and Health
- Health Research Fund
- Regional Governments of Andalucía, Asturias, Basque Country, Murcia and Navarra
- Swedish Cancer Society, Swedish Research Council and County Councils of Skåne and Västerbotten
- German Federal Ministry of Education and Research, Programme of Clinical Biomedical Research
- German Cancer Research Center
- Rudolf-Bartling Foundation
- Helsinki University Hospital Research Fund
- University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine Dean’s Faculty Advancement Award
- Department of Defense
- NCI
- Swedish Cancer Society, Swedish Research Council, Beta Kamprad Foundation
- Danish Cancer Society, Copenhagen
- Mayo Foundation
- Minnesota Ovarian Cancer Alliance
- Fred C. and Katherine B. Andersen Foundation
- VicHealth and Cancer Council Victoria, Cancer Council Victoria
- National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia
- NHMRC
- DOD Ovarian Cancer Research Program
- Moffitt Cancer Center
- Merck Pharmaceuticals
- Radboud University Medical Centre
- UK National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centres at the University of Cambridge
- National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
- The Swedish Cancer Foundation
- the Swedish Research Council
- American Cancer Society
- Celma Mastry Ovarian Cancer Foundation
- Lon V Smith Foundation
- The Eve Appeal
- National Institute for Health Research University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre
- California Cancer Research Program
- National Science Centre
- NIH
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amber A DeVries
- Center for Bioinformatics and Functional Genomics, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Joe Dennis
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Jonathan P Tyrer
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Pei-Chen Peng
- Center for Bioinformatics and Functional Genomics, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Simon G Coetzee
- Center for Bioinformatics and Functional Genomics, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Alberto L Reyes
- Center for Bioinformatics and Functional Genomics, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Jasmine T Plummer
- Center for Bioinformatics and Functional Genomics, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Applied Genomics, Computation and Translational Core, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Brian D Davis
- Center for Bioinformatics and Functional Genomics, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Applied Genomics, Computation and Translational Core, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Stephanie S Chen
- Center for Bioinformatics and Functional Genomics, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Applied Genomics, Computation and Translational Core, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Felipe Segato Dezem
- Center for Bioinformatics and Functional Genomics, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Katja K H Aben
- Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Hoda Anton-Culver
- Department of Medicine, Genetic Epidemiology Research Institute, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - Natalia N Antonenkova
- N.N. Alexandrov Research Institute of Oncology and Medical Radiology, Minsk, Belarus
| | - Matthias W Beckmann
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Region of Nuremberg, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Alicia Beeghly-Fadiel
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Andrew Berchuck
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Duke University Hospital, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Natalia V Bogdanova
- N.N. Alexandrov Research Institute of Oncology and Medical Radiology, Minsk, Belarus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
- Gynaecology Research Unit, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | | | - James D Brenton
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Ralf Butzow
- Department of Pathology, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Ian Campbell
- Cancer Genetics Laboratory, Research Division, Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jenny Chang-Claude
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Cancer Epidemiology Group, University Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Georgia Chenevix-Trench
- Department of Genetics and Computational Biology, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Linda S Cook
- Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
- Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Anna DeFazio
- Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- The Daffodil Centre, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jennifer A Doherty
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Thilo Dörk
- Gynaecology Research Unit, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Diana M Eccles
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - A Heather Eliassen
- Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Peter A Fasching
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Region of Nuremberg, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
- David Geffen School of Medicine, Department of Medicine Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Renée T Fortner
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Graham G Giles
- Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ellen L Goode
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Division of Epidemiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Marc T Goodman
- Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cancer Prevention and Genetics Program, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Jacek Gronwald
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Niclas Håkansson
- Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Chad Huff
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - David G Huntsman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Department of Molecular Oncology, BC Cancer Research Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Allan Jensen
- Department of Lifestyle, Reproduction and Cancer, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Siddhartha Kar
- Medical Research Council Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Section of Translational Epidemiology, Division of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Beth Y Karlan
- David Geffen School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Elza K Khusnutdinova
- Institute of Biochemistry and Genetics, Ufa Federal Research Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Ufa, Russia
- Saint Petersburg State University, Saint Petersburg, Russia
| | - Lambertus A Kiemeney
- Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Susanne K Kjaer
- Department of Lifestyle, Reproduction and Cancer, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Gynaecology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jolanta Kupryjanczyk
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Diagnostics, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Marilyne Labrie
- Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Diether Lambrechts
- VIB Center for Cancer Biology, VIB, Leuven, Belgium
- Laboratory for Translational Genetics, Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Nhu D Le
- Cancer Control Research, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Jan Lubiński
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Taymaa May
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University Health Network, Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Usha Menon
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Clinical Trials & Methodology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Roger L Milne
- Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Francesmary Modugno
- Women's Cancer Research Center, Magee-Womens Research Institute and Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Alvaro N Monteiro
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Kirsten B Moysich
- Department of Cancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Kunle Odunsi
- Department of Oncology, University of Chicago Medicine Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, IL, USA
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Chicago Medicine Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Håkan Olsson
- Oncology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Celeste L Pearce
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Tanja Pejovic
- Laboratory for Translational Genetics, Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Susan J Ramus
- School of Women's and Children's Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of NSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Adult Cancer Program, Lowy Cancer Research Centre, University of NSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | - Marjorie J Riggan
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Duke University Hospital, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Isabelle Romieu
- Nutrition and Metabolism Section, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC-WHO), Lyon, France
| | - Dale P Sandler
- Epidemiology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | - Joellen M Schildkraut
- Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - V Wendy Setiawan
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Weiva Sieh
- Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Honglin Song
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Rebecca Sutphen
- Epidemiology Center, College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Kathryn L Terry
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Epidemiology Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Pamela J Thompson
- Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cancer Prevention and Genetics Program, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Linda Titus
- Muskie School of Public Policy, Public Health, Portland, ME, USA
| | - Shelley S Tworoger
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Els Van Nieuwenhuysen
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Leuven Cancer Institute, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Digna Velez Edwards
- Division of Quantitative Sciences, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Women's Health Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Penelope M Webb
- Population Health Department, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Nicolas Wentzensen
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Alice S Whittemore
- Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
- Department of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Alicja Wolk
- Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Anna H Wu
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Argyrios Ziogas
- Department of Medicine, Genetic Epidemiology Research Institute, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - Matthew L Freedman
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kate Lawrenson
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women's Cancer Program at the Samuel Oschin Cancer Institute Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Paul D P Pharoah
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Douglas F Easton
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Simon A Gayther
- Center for Bioinformatics and Functional Genomics, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Michelle R Jones
- Center for Bioinformatics and Functional Genomics, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Smallwood KG, Crockett S, Huang V, Cullimore V, Davies J, Satti G, Phillips A. Changing patterns of referral into a family history clinic and detection of ovarian cancer: a retrospective 10-year review. J OBSTET GYNAECOL 2022; 42:2652-2658. [PMID: 35980980 DOI: 10.1080/01443615.2022.2111253] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
This study examines whether a change in the criteria for genetic testing for ovarian cancer risk changed the nature of referrals into our Familial Cancer service. This is a retrospective review of 273 women who underwent risk reducing surgery (RRS). The primary outcome was to establish whether there was an increase in women having RRS with a confirmed genetic mutation. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of occult cancer and of subsequent primary peritoneal cancer. The results showed an increase in women being offered RRS based on genetic diagnosis; 91% versus 32% before the criteria change. Four occult malignancies (1.5%) and two peritoneal cancers (0.7%) were noted.We have demonstrated a change in the nature of referrals to the familial cancer service from perceived risk to genetic diagnosis. We can now counsel women more accurately. With a defined risk we are enabling them to make an informed decision regarding risk reduction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K G Smallwood
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospitals of Derby and Burton, Derby, UK
| | - S Crockett
- Department of Familial Cancer, University Hospitals of Derby and Burton, Derby, UK
| | - V Huang
- Medical School, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - V Cullimore
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospitals of Derby and Burton, Derby, UK
| | - J Davies
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospitals of Derby and Burton, Derby, UK
| | - G Satti
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospitals of Derby and Burton, Derby, UK
| | - A Phillips
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospitals of Derby and Burton, Derby, UK
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Boussios S, Rassy E, Moschetta M, Ghose A, Adeleke S, Sanchez E, Sheriff M, Chargari C, Pavlidis N. BRCA Mutations in Ovarian and Prostate Cancer: Bench to Bedside. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14163888. [PMID: 36010882 PMCID: PMC9405840 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14163888] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 32.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2022] [Revised: 08/09/2022] [Accepted: 08/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary DNA damage is one of the hallmarks of cancer. Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) —especially the high-grade serous subtype—harbors a defect in at least one DNA damage response (DDR) pathway. Defective DDR results from a variety of lesions affecting homologous recombination (HR) and nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) for double strand breaks, base excision repair (BER), and nucleotide excision repair (NER) for single strand breaks and mismatch repair (MMR). Apart from the EOC, mutations in the DDR genes, such as BRCA1 and BRCA2, are common in prostate cancer as well. Among them, BRCA2 lesions are found in 12% of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancers, but very rarely in primary prostate cancer. Better understanding of the DDR pathways is essential in order to optimize the therapeutic choices, and has led to the design of biomarker-driven clinical trials. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors are now a standard therapy for EOC patients, and more recently have been approved for the metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer with alterations in DDR genes. They are particularly effective in tumours with HR deficiency. Abstract DNA damage repair (DDR) defects are common in different cancer types, and these alterations can be exploited therapeutically. Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is among the tumours with the highest percentage of hereditary cases. BRCA1 and BRCA2 predisposing pathogenic variants (PVs) were the first to be associated with EOC, whereas additional genes comprising the homologous recombination (HR) pathway have been discovered with DNA sequencing technologies. The incidence of DDR alterations among patients with metastatic prostate cancer is much higher compared to those with localized disease. Genetic testing is playing an increasingly important role in the treatment of patients with ovarian and prostate cancer. The development of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors offers a therapeutic strategy for patients with EOC. One of the mechanisms of PARP inhibitors exploits the concept of synthetic lethality. Tumours with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations are highly sensitive to PARP inhibitors. Moreover, the synthetic lethal interaction may be exploited beyond germline BRCA mutations in the context of HR deficiency, and this is an area of ongoing research. PARP inhibitors are in advanced stages of development as a treatment for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. However, there is a major concern regarding the need to identify reliable biomarkers predictive of treatment response. In this review, we explore the mechanisms of DDR, the potential for genomic analysis of ovarian and prostate cancer, and therapeutics of PARP inhibitors, along with predictive biomarkers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stergios Boussios
- Department of Medical Oncology, Medway NHS Foundation Trust, Windmill Road, Gillingham ME7 5NY, UK
- Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, King’s College London, London SE1 9RT, UK
- AELIA Organization, 9th Km Thessaloniki-Thermi, 57001 Thessaloniki, Greece
- Correspondence:
| | - Elie Rassy
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy Institut, 94805 Villejuif, France
| | - Michele Moschetta
- Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, CH 4033 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Aruni Ghose
- Department of Medical Oncology, Medway NHS Foundation Trust, Windmill Road, Gillingham ME7 5NY, UK
- Department of Medical Oncology, Barts Cancer Centre, St. Bartholomew’s Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London E1 1BB, UK
- Department of Medical Oncology, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, East and North Hertfordshire NHS Trust, London KT1 2EE, UK
- Centre for Education, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King’s College London, London SE1 9RT, UK
| | - Sola Adeleke
- High Dimensional Neurology Group, UCL Queen’s Square Institute of Neurology, London WC1N 3BG, UK
- Department of Oncology, Guy’s and St Thomas’ Hospital, London SE1 9RT, UK
- School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, King’s College London, Strand, London WC2R 2LS, UK
| | - Elisabet Sanchez
- Department of Medical Oncology, Medway NHS Foundation Trust, Windmill Road, Gillingham ME7 5NY, UK
| | - Matin Sheriff
- Department of Urology, Medway NHS Foundation Trust, Windmill Road, Gillingham ME7 5NY, UK
| | - Cyrus Chargari
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy Institut, 94805 Villejuif, France
| | - Nicholas Pavlidis
- Medical School, University of Ioannina, Stavros Niarchou Avenue, 45110 Ioannina, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Goh JC, Gourley C, Tan DSP, Nogueira-Rodrigues A, Elghazaly H, Edy Pierre M, Giornelli G, Kim BG, Morales–Vasquez F, Tyulyandina A. Optimizing treatment selection and sequencing decisions for first-line maintenance therapy of newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer – International considerations amongst upper middle- and high-income countries (UMIC and HIC). Gynecol Oncol Rep 2022; 42:101028. [PMID: 35813356 PMCID: PMC9263863 DOI: 10.1016/j.gore.2022.101028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2022] [Revised: 06/04/2022] [Accepted: 06/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Early BRCA testing is crucial and enables personalized treatment approach. BRCA mutation analysis is essential and should be utilized at the time of diagnosis. Single-agent PARP inhibitors seem most beneficial in BRCA mutations or HRD. Evidence suggests bevacizumab or niraparib-alone benefits for HRD-negative patients. HRD-tailored treatment should be explored further.
The incidence and mortality rates of ovarian cancer are increasing globally. Ovarian cancer is diagnosed at an advanced stage in 80% of women. After standard, platinum-based, front-line chemotherapy, poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors and antiangiogenic agents are successfully employed as maintenance strategies for newly diagnosed, advanced ovarian cancer patients. Landmark clinical studies, including SOLO-1, PAOLA-1, PRIMA, and VELIA, have provided crucial insights on optimizing first-line maintenance treatment using PARP inhibitors. A group of ovarian cancer experts, primarily from low- and middle-income countries, met in September 2019 to discuss new developments for the first-line treatment of ovarian cancer and its implications. Key implications of the evolving clinical data included: (1) olaparib or niraparib maintenance therapy appears to be the preferred choice for patients with BRCA1/2 mutations; hence, BRCA testing is beneficial in identifying these patients; (2) niraparib monotherapy and olaparib in combination with bevacizumab have demonstrated significant benefit in progression-free survival (PFS) in homologous recombination deficiency (HRD)-positive patients; (3) bevacizumab, niraparib alone, or observation can be an alternative for HRD-negative patients; (4) further data is warranted to explore the role of PARP inhibitors in treating HRD-negative, ovarian cancer patients to confirm findings of the exploratory analysis of PRIMA; (5) PARP inhibitors may be beneficial for stage IV ovarian cancer patients with inoperable disease and patients with prior neoadjuvant chemotherapy; and (6) there is an urgent need to increase awareness in both clinicians and patients on BRCA and HRD testing for optimizing treatment decision-making and improving clinical outcomes in newly diagnosed, advanced ovarian cancer patients. In clinical medicine, the limited availability of family history (FH) information and the complexity of FH criteria has hampered the implementation of BRCA testing. Moreover, many cancer patients with BRCA mutations are not tested because they do not meet the criteria for FH. Consequently, BRCA testing in many high income countries, including the US and Australia, is underused and used inappropriately, which has resulted in the loss of valuable opportunities for better cancer management and cancer prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey C.H. Goh
- Department of Oncology – Cancer Care Services, Level 5, Joyce Tweddell Building, Royal Brisbane & Women’s Hospital, Butterfield Street, Herston, Queensland 4029, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Australia
- Corresponding author at: Department of Oncology – Cancer Care Services, Level 5, Joyce Tweddell Building, Royal Brisbane & Women’s Hospital, Butterfield Street, Herston, Queensland 4029, Australia.
| | - Charlie Gourley
- Edinburgh Cancer Research UK Centre, MRC IGMM, University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Crewe Road South Edinburgh, EH4 2XR, UK
| | - David S P Tan
- Department of Haematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore
| | - Angélica Nogueira-Rodrigues
- Federal University of Minas Gerais, DOM Oncologia, Grupo Oncoclınicas, EVA Brazilian Group of Gynecologic Cancer, LACOG, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Hesham Elghazaly
- Clinical Oncology Head of Medical Research Center MASRI, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Marc Edy Pierre
- Gynecology Oncology Unit, Luis Carlos Samiento Angulo Cancer Treatment and Research Center - CTIC,Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Gonzalo Giornelli
- Department of Oncology, Instituto Alexander Fleming, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Byoung-Gie Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | | | - Alexandra Tyulyandina
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology And Chemotherapy, N. N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center, Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Shah S, Cheung A, Kutka M, Sheriff M, Boussios S. Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: Providing Evidence of Predisposition Genes. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:ijerph19138113. [PMID: 35805770 PMCID: PMC9265838 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19138113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2022] [Revised: 06/28/2022] [Accepted: 06/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is one of the cancers most influenced by hereditary factors. A fourth to a fifth of unselected EOC patients carry pathogenic variants (PVs) in a number of genes, the majority of which encode for proteins involved in DNA mismatch repair (MMR) pathways. PVs in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes are responsible for a substantial fraction of hereditary EOC. In addition, PV genes involved in the MMR pathway account for 10–15% of hereditary EOC. The identification of women with homologous recombination (HR)-deficient EOCs has significant clinical implications, concerning chemotherapy regimen planning and development as well as the use of targeted therapies such as poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors. With several genes involved, the complexity of genetic testing increases. In this context, next-generation sequencing (NGS) allows testing for multiple genes simultaneously with a rapid turnaround time. In this review, we discuss the EOC risk assessment in the era of NGS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sidrah Shah
- Department of Palliative Care, Guy’s and St Thomas’ Hospital, London SE1 9RT, UK;
| | - Alison Cheung
- Department of Hematology/Medical Oncology, Medway NHS Foundation Trust, Windmill Road, Kent, Gillingham ME7 5NY, UK; (A.C.); (M.K.)
| | - Mikolaj Kutka
- Department of Hematology/Medical Oncology, Medway NHS Foundation Trust, Windmill Road, Kent, Gillingham ME7 5NY, UK; (A.C.); (M.K.)
| | - Matin Sheriff
- Department of Urology, Medway NHS Foundation Trust, Windmill Road, Kent, Gillingham ME7 5NY, UK;
| | - Stergios Boussios
- Department of Palliative Care, Guy’s and St Thomas’ Hospital, London SE1 9RT, UK;
- King’s College London, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, London SE1 9RT, UK
- AELIA Organization, 9th Km Thessaloniki-Thermi, 57001 Thessaloniki, Greece
- Correspondence: or or
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Atwal A, Snowsill T, Cabrera Dandy M, Krum T, Newton C, Evans DG, Crosbie EJ, Ryan NAJ. The prevalence of mismatch repair deficiency in ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Int J Cancer 2022; 151:1626-1639. [PMID: 35792468 PMCID: PMC9539584 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.34165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2022] [Revised: 04/22/2022] [Accepted: 05/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Ovarian cancer (OC) is the least survivable gynecological malignancy and presents late. Five‐year survival for OC is around 45% increasing the need for innovative treatments. Checkpoint inhibitors have shown significant clinical efficacy in mismatch repair deficient (MMRd) cancers and could be a powerful treatment in OC. However, their application in OC is limited due to the lack of data on the prevalence of MMRd. The aim of our study was to conduct a systematic review of the literature and meta‐analysis to provide an accurate estimate of the prevalence of MMRd in OC. We followed PRISMA guidelines throughout. Studies were identified by electronic searches of Medline, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL and Web of Science followed by citation searching. Studies not written in English were excluded. All studies were reviewed by at least two independent reviewers. Proportions of test positivity were calculated by random and fixed‐effects meta‐analysis models. I2 score was used to assess heterogeneity across studies. In total 54 studies were included with 17 532 analyzed for MMRd. The overall proportions of MMRd by immunohistochemistry and microsatellite instability analysis were 6.7% and 10.4%, respectively. MMRd was reported in all histotypes of epithelial OC but was most common in endometrioid OC. We estimate that on average 46.7% (95% CI: 28.8‐65.4) of ovarian carcinomas showing MMRd by IHC had a germline path_MMR variant identified. OC in those with Lynch syndrome seems to present at an earlier age and stage. Studies however were generally of low quality and there was a high degree of heterogeneity. A significant minority (up to 16%) of OC displays MMRd and, therefore, could be amenable to checkpoint inhibition therapy. However, the current literature base is of limited quality and therefore high‐quality prospective studies exploring MMRd in OC with the use of multimodal testing are required. In addition, trials researching efficacy of checkpoint inhibition in MMRd OC are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amit Atwal
- Clinical Medical School University of Bristol Bristol UK
| | - Tristan Snowsill
- Health Economics Group University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter
| | - Marcus Cabrera Dandy
- The Lancashire Women's and Newborn Centre, Burnley General Hospital East Lancashire UK
| | - Thomas Krum
- Clinical Medical School University of Bristol Bristol UK
| | - Claire Newton
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology St Michaels Hospital Bristol UK
| | - D Gareth Evans
- Division of Evolution and Genomic Medicine, St Mary's Hospital University of Manchester Manchester UK
| | - Emma J Crosbie
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health University of Manchester, St Mary's Hospital Manchester UK
| | - Neil AJ Ryan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology St Michaels Hospital Bristol UK
- The Academic Women's Health Unit, Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School University of Bristol Bristol UK
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Freire MV, Martin M, Thissen R, Van Marcke C, Segers K, Sépulchre E, Leroi N, Lété C, Fasquelle C, Radermacher J, Gokburun Y, Collignon J, Sacré A, Josse C, Palmeira L, Bours V. Case Report Series: Aggressive HR Deficient Colorectal Cancers Related to BRCA1 Pathogenic Germline Variants. Front Oncol 2022; 12:835581. [PMID: 35280729 PMCID: PMC8911702 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.835581] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2021] [Accepted: 02/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective The link between BRCA1 and homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) in cancer has gained importance with the emergence of new targeted cancer treatments, while the available data on the role of the gene in colorectal cancer (CRC) remain contradictory. The aim of this case series was to elucidate the role of known pathogenic BRCA1 variants in the development of early-onset CRC. Design Patients were evaluated using targeted next generation sequencing, exome sequencing and chromosomal microarray analysis of the paired germline and tumor samples. These results were used to calculate the HRD score and the frequency of mutational signatures in the tumors. Results Three patients with metastatic CRC were heterozygous for a previously known BRCA1 nonsense variant. All tumors showed remarkably high HRD scores, and the HRD-related signature 3 had the second highest contribution to the somatic pattern of variant accumulation in the samples (23% in 1 and 2, and 13% in sample 3). Conclusions A BRCA1 germline pathogenic variant can be involved in CRC development through HRD. Thus, BRCA1 testing should be considered in young patients with a personal history of microsatellite stable CRC as this could further allow a personalized treatment approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Valeria Freire
- Department of Human Genetics, GIGA Research Center - University of Liège and Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Marie Martin
- Department of Human Genetics, GIGA Research Center - University of Liège and Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Romain Thissen
- Department of Human Genetics, GIGA Research Center - University of Liège and Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Cédric Van Marcke
- Institute for Experimental and Clinical Research (Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Pôle Molecular Imaging, Radiotherapy and Oncology (MIRO)), Université Catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain), Brussels, Belgium.,Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Roi Albert II, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Karin Segers
- Department of Human Genetics, GIGA Research Center - University of Liège and Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Edith Sépulchre
- Department of Human Genetics, GIGA Research Center - University of Liège and Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Natacha Leroi
- Department of Human Genetics, GIGA Research Center - University of Liège and Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Céline Lété
- Department of Human Genetics, GIGA Research Center - University of Liège and Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Corinne Fasquelle
- Department of Human Genetics, GIGA Research Center - University of Liège and Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Jean Radermacher
- Department of Pathology, Institut de Pathologie et de Génétique, Charleroi, Belgium
| | - Yeter Gokburun
- Department of Gastroenterology, Centre Hospitalier Régional Sambre et Meuse, Namur, Belgium
| | - Joelle Collignon
- Department of Medical Oncology, GIGA Research Center - University of Liège and Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Anne Sacré
- Onco-Hematology Department, Centre Hospitalier Régional (CHR) Verviers, Verviers, Belgium
| | - Claire Josse
- Department of Medical Oncology, GIGA Research Center - University of Liège and Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Leonor Palmeira
- Department of Human Genetics, GIGA Research Center - University of Liège and Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Vincent Bours
- Department of Human Genetics, GIGA Research Center - University of Liège and Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Liège, Liège, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Fanale D, Pivetti A, Cancelliere D, Spera A, Bono M, Fiorino A, Pedone E, Barraco N, Brando C, Perez A, Guarneri MF, Russo TDB, Vieni S, Guarneri G, Russo A, Bazan V. BRCA1/2 variants of unknown significance in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) syndrome: looking for the hidden meaning. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2022; 172:103626. [PMID: 35150867 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2022.103626] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2021] [Revised: 01/28/2022] [Accepted: 02/07/2022] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome is caused by germline mutations in BRCA1/2 genes. These genes are very large and their mutations are heterogeneous and scattered throughout the coding sequence. In addition to the above-mentioned mutations, variants of uncertain/unknown significance (VUSs) have been identified in BRCA genes, which make more difficult the clinical management of the patient and risk assessment. In the last decades, several laboratories have developed different databases that contain more than 2000 variants for the two genes and integrated strategies which include multifactorial prediction models based on direct and indirect genetic evidence, to classify the VUS and attribute them a clinical significance associated with a deleterious, high-low or neutral risk. This review provides a comprehensive overview of literature studies concerning the VUSs, in order to assess their impact on the population and provide new insight for the appropriate patient management in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniele Fanale
- Section of Medical Oncology, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy
| | - Alessia Pivetti
- Section of Medical Oncology, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy
| | - Daniela Cancelliere
- Section of Medical Oncology, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy
| | - Antonio Spera
- Department of Radiotherapy, San Giovanni di Dio Hospital, ASP of Agrigento, Agrigento, Italy
| | - Marco Bono
- Section of Medical Oncology, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy
| | - Alessia Fiorino
- Section of Medical Oncology, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy
| | - Erika Pedone
- Section of Medical Oncology, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy
| | - Nadia Barraco
- Section of Medical Oncology, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy
| | - Chiara Brando
- Section of Medical Oncology, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy
| | - Alessandro Perez
- Section of Medical Oncology, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy
| | | | - Tancredi Didier Bazan Russo
- Section of Medical Oncology, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy
| | - Salvatore Vieni
- Division of General and Oncological Surgery, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, Italy
| | - Girolamo Guarneri
- Gynecology Section, Mother - Child Department, University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy
| | - Antonio Russo
- Section of Medical Oncology, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy.
| | - Viviana Bazan
- Department of Biomedicine, Neuroscience and Advanced Diagnostics, University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Yoshida R. Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC): review of its molecular characteristics, screening, treatment, and prognosis. Breast Cancer 2021; 28:1167-1180. [PMID: 32862296 PMCID: PMC8514387 DOI: 10.1007/s12282-020-01148-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 98] [Impact Index Per Article: 32.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2020] [Accepted: 08/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Breast cancer is a common cancer affecting a large number of patients. Notably, 5-10% of all breast cancer patients are genetically predisposed to cancers. Although the most common breast cancer susceptibility genes are BRCA1 and BRCA2, which are also associated with the risk of developing ovarian and pancreatic cancer, advances in next-generation sequencing (NGS) analysis technology enabled the discovery of several non-BRCA genes responsible for breast and ovarian cancers. Studies on hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) involve not only determining the predisposition to developing cancer, but also considering the current treatment for breast cancer, prevention of next cancer, risk diagnosis, and adoption of protective measures for relatives. We present a comprehensive review of HBOC, which will be a useful resource in the clinical setting. Many hereditary tumors, including HBOC, are syndromes characterized by the development of different types of cancer in succession. Taking advantage of knowing predisposition of susceptibility to cancer, it is important to continue and update cancer management protocols, which includes the adoption of preventive measures, countermeasures, and treatments, to accurately assess and prevent the impact of cancer on the quality of life of the next generation of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reiko Yoshida
- Showa University Advanced Cancer Translational Research Institute, 1-5-8 Hatanodai, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo, 142-8555, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Chandrasekaran D, Sobocan M, Blyuss O, Miller RE, Evans O, Crusz SM, Mills-Baldock T, Sun L, Hammond RFL, Gaba F, Jenkins LA, Ahmed M, Kumar A, Jeyarajah A, Lawrence AC, Brockbank E, Phadnis S, Quigley M, El Khouly F, Wuntakal R, Faruqi A, Trevisan G, Casey L, Burghel GJ, Schlecht H, Bulman M, Smith P, Bowers NL, Legood R, Lockley M, Wallace A, Singh N, Evans DG, Manchanda R. Implementation of Multigene Germline and Parallel Somatic Genetic Testing in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: SIGNPOST Study. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13174344. [PMID: 34503154 PMCID: PMC8431198 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13174344] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2021] [Revised: 08/09/2021] [Accepted: 08/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
We present findings of a cancer multidisciplinary-team (MDT) coordinated mainstreaming pathway of unselected 5-panel germline BRCA1/BRCA2/RAD51C/RAD51D/BRIP1 and parallel somatic BRCA1/BRCA2 testing in all women with epithelial-OC and highlight the discordance between germline and somatic testing strategies across two cancer centres. Patients were counselled and consented by a cancer MDT member. The uptake of parallel multi-gene germline and somatic testing was 97.7%. Counselling by clinical-nurse-specialist more frequently needed >1 consultation (53.6% (30/56)) compared to a medical (15.0% (21/137)) or surgical oncologist (15.3% (17/110)) (p < 0.001). The median age was 54 (IQR = 51-62) years in germline pathogenic-variant (PV) versus 61 (IQR = 51-71) in BRCA wild-type (p = 0.001). There was no significant difference in distribution of PVs by ethnicity, stage, surgery timing or resection status. A total of 15.5% germline and 7.8% somatic BRCA1/BRCA2 PVs were identified. A total of 2.3% patients had RAD51C/RAD51D/BRIP1 PVs. A total of 11% germline PVs were large-genomic-rearrangements and missed by somatic testing. A total of 20% germline PVs are missed by somatic first BRCA-testing approach and 55.6% germline PVs missed by family history ascertainment. The somatic testing failure rate is higher (23%) for patients undergoing diagnostic biopsies. Our findings favour a prospective parallel somatic and germline panel testing approach as a clinically efficient strategy to maximise variant identification. UK Genomics test-directory criteria should be expanded to include a panel of OC genes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dhivya Chandrasekaran
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Barts CRUK Cancer Centre, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London EC1M 6BQ, UK; (D.C.); (M.S.); (O.E.); (L.S.); (F.G.)
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London EC1 1BB, UK; (A.J.); (A.C.L.); (E.B.); (S.P.)
| | - Monika Sobocan
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Barts CRUK Cancer Centre, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London EC1M 6BQ, UK; (D.C.); (M.S.); (O.E.); (L.S.); (F.G.)
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London EC1 1BB, UK; (A.J.); (A.C.L.); (E.B.); (S.P.)
- Divison for Gynaecology and Perinatology, University Medical Centre Maribor, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia
| | - Oleg Blyuss
- School of Physics, Engineering and Computer Science, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield AL10 9AB, UK;
- Department of Paediatrics and Paediatric Infectious Diseases, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow 119991, Russia
- World-Class Research Center “Digital Biodesign and Personalized Healthcare”, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow 119991, Russia
| | - Rowan E. Miller
- Department of Medical Oncology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London EC1A 7BE, UK; (R.E.M.); (S.M.C.)
| | - Olivia Evans
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Barts CRUK Cancer Centre, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London EC1M 6BQ, UK; (D.C.); (M.S.); (O.E.); (L.S.); (F.G.)
| | - Shanthini M. Crusz
- Department of Medical Oncology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London EC1A 7BE, UK; (R.E.M.); (S.M.C.)
| | - Tina Mills-Baldock
- Department of Medical Oncology, Barking, Havering & Redbridge University Hospitals, Essex RM7 0AG, UK; (T.M.-B.); (M.Q.); (F.E.K.)
| | - Li Sun
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Barts CRUK Cancer Centre, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London EC1M 6BQ, UK; (D.C.); (M.S.); (O.E.); (L.S.); (F.G.)
- Department of Health Services Research, Faculty of Public Health & Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London WC1H 9SH, UK;
| | - Rory F. L. Hammond
- Department of Pathology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London E1 1FR, UK; (R.F.L.H.); (A.F.); (G.T.); (L.C.); (N.S.)
| | - Faiza Gaba
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Barts CRUK Cancer Centre, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London EC1M 6BQ, UK; (D.C.); (M.S.); (O.E.); (L.S.); (F.G.)
| | - Lucy A. Jenkins
- North East Thames Regional Genetics Service, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London WC1N 3JH, UK; (L.A.J.); (M.A.); (A.K.)
| | - Munaza Ahmed
- North East Thames Regional Genetics Service, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London WC1N 3JH, UK; (L.A.J.); (M.A.); (A.K.)
| | - Ajith Kumar
- North East Thames Regional Genetics Service, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London WC1N 3JH, UK; (L.A.J.); (M.A.); (A.K.)
| | - Arjun Jeyarajah
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London EC1 1BB, UK; (A.J.); (A.C.L.); (E.B.); (S.P.)
| | - Alexandra C. Lawrence
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London EC1 1BB, UK; (A.J.); (A.C.L.); (E.B.); (S.P.)
| | - Elly Brockbank
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London EC1 1BB, UK; (A.J.); (A.C.L.); (E.B.); (S.P.)
| | - Saurabh Phadnis
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London EC1 1BB, UK; (A.J.); (A.C.L.); (E.B.); (S.P.)
| | - Mary Quigley
- Department of Medical Oncology, Barking, Havering & Redbridge University Hospitals, Essex RM7 0AG, UK; (T.M.-B.); (M.Q.); (F.E.K.)
| | - Fatima El Khouly
- Department of Medical Oncology, Barking, Havering & Redbridge University Hospitals, Essex RM7 0AG, UK; (T.M.-B.); (M.Q.); (F.E.K.)
| | - Rekha Wuntakal
- Department of Gynaecology, Barking, Havering & Redbridge University Hospitals, Essex RM7 0AG, UK;
| | - Asma Faruqi
- Department of Pathology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London E1 1FR, UK; (R.F.L.H.); (A.F.); (G.T.); (L.C.); (N.S.)
| | - Giorgia Trevisan
- Department of Pathology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London E1 1FR, UK; (R.F.L.H.); (A.F.); (G.T.); (L.C.); (N.S.)
| | - Laura Casey
- Department of Pathology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London E1 1FR, UK; (R.F.L.H.); (A.F.); (G.T.); (L.C.); (N.S.)
| | - George J. Burghel
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Saint Marys Hospital, Manchester M13 9WL, UK; (G.J.B.); (H.S.); (M.B.); (P.S.); (N.L.B.); (A.W.); (D.G.E.)
| | - Helene Schlecht
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Saint Marys Hospital, Manchester M13 9WL, UK; (G.J.B.); (H.S.); (M.B.); (P.S.); (N.L.B.); (A.W.); (D.G.E.)
| | - Michael Bulman
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Saint Marys Hospital, Manchester M13 9WL, UK; (G.J.B.); (H.S.); (M.B.); (P.S.); (N.L.B.); (A.W.); (D.G.E.)
| | - Philip Smith
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Saint Marys Hospital, Manchester M13 9WL, UK; (G.J.B.); (H.S.); (M.B.); (P.S.); (N.L.B.); (A.W.); (D.G.E.)
| | - Naomi L. Bowers
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Saint Marys Hospital, Manchester M13 9WL, UK; (G.J.B.); (H.S.); (M.B.); (P.S.); (N.L.B.); (A.W.); (D.G.E.)
| | - Rosa Legood
- Department of Health Services Research, Faculty of Public Health & Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London WC1H 9SH, UK;
| | - Michelle Lockley
- Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London EC1M 6BQ, UK;
| | - Andrew Wallace
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Saint Marys Hospital, Manchester M13 9WL, UK; (G.J.B.); (H.S.); (M.B.); (P.S.); (N.L.B.); (A.W.); (D.G.E.)
| | - Naveena Singh
- Department of Pathology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London E1 1FR, UK; (R.F.L.H.); (A.F.); (G.T.); (L.C.); (N.S.)
| | - D. Gareth Evans
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Saint Marys Hospital, Manchester M13 9WL, UK; (G.J.B.); (H.S.); (M.B.); (P.S.); (N.L.B.); (A.W.); (D.G.E.)
| | - Ranjit Manchanda
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Barts CRUK Cancer Centre, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London EC1M 6BQ, UK; (D.C.); (M.S.); (O.E.); (L.S.); (F.G.)
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London EC1 1BB, UK; (A.J.); (A.C.L.); (E.B.); (S.P.)
- Department of Health Services Research, Faculty of Public Health & Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London WC1H 9SH, UK;
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Guo M, Wang SM. Genome Instability-Derived Genes Are Novel Prognostic Biomarkers for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. Front Cell Dev Biol 2021; 9:701073. [PMID: 34322487 PMCID: PMC8312551 DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2021.701073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2021] [Accepted: 06/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive disease. Recent studies have identified genome instability-derived genes for patient outcomes. However, most of the studies mainly focused on only one or a few genome instability-related genes. Prognostic potential and clinical significance of genome instability-associated genes in TNBC have not been well explored. Methods In this study, we developed a computational approach to identify TNBC prognostic signature. It consisted of (1) using somatic mutations and copy number variations (CNVs) in TNBC to build a binary matrix and identifying the top and bottom 25% mutated samples, (2) comparing the gene expression between the top and bottom 25% samples to identify genome instability-related genes, and (3) performing univariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis to identify survival-associated gene signature, and Kaplan–Meier, log-rank test, and multivariate Cox regression analyses to obtain overall survival (OS) information for TNBC outcome prediction. Results From the identified 111 genome instability-related genes, we extracted a genome instability-derived gene signature (GIGenSig) of 11 genes. Through survival analysis, we were able to classify TNBC cases into high- and low-risk groups by the signature in the training dataset (log-rank test p = 2.66e−04), validated its prognostic performance in the testing (log-rank test p = 2.45e−02) and Molecular Taxonomy of Breast Cancer International Consortium (METABRIC) (log-rank test p = 2.57e−05) datasets, and further validated the predictive power of the signature in five independent datasets. Conclusion The identified novel signature provides a better understanding of genome instability in TNBC and can be applied as prognostic markers for clinical TNBC management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maoni Guo
- Cancer Centre and Institute of Translational Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Macau, Macau, China
| | - San Ming Wang
- Cancer Centre and Institute of Translational Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Macau, Macau, China
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Song H, Dicks EM, Tyrer J, Intermaggio M, Chenevix-Trench G, Bowtell DD, Traficante N, Group A, Brenton J, Goranova T, Hosking K, Piskorz A, van Oudenhove E, Doherty J, Harris HR, Rossing MA, Duerst M, Dork T, Bogdanova NV, Modugno F, Moysich K, Odunsi K, Ness R, Karlan BY, Lester J, Jensen A, Krüger Kjaer S, Høgdall E, Campbell IG, Lázaro C, Pujara MA, Cunningham J, Vierkant R, Winham SJ, Hildebrandt M, Huff C, Li D, Wu X, Yu Y, Permuth JB, Levine DA, Schildkraut JM, Riggan MJ, Berchuck A, Webb PM, Group OS, Cybulski C, Gronwald J, Jakubowska A, Lubinski J, Alsop J, Harrington P, Chan I, Menon U, Pearce CL, Wu AH, de Fazio A, Kennedy CJ, Goode E, Ramus S, Gayther S, Pharoah P. Population-based targeted sequencing of 54 candidate genes identifies PALB2 as a susceptibility gene for high-grade serous ovarian cancer. J Med Genet 2021; 58:305-313. [PMID: 32546565 PMCID: PMC8086250 DOI: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2019-106739] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2019] [Revised: 03/13/2020] [Accepted: 05/12/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The known epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) susceptibility genes account for less than 50% of the heritable risk of ovarian cancer suggesting that other susceptibility genes exist. The aim of this study was to evaluate the contribution to ovarian cancer susceptibility of rare deleterious germline variants in a set of candidate genes. METHODS We sequenced the coding region of 54 candidate genes in 6385 invasive EOC cases and 6115 controls of broad European ancestry. Genes with an increased frequency of putative deleterious variants in cases versus controls were further examined in an independent set of 14 135 EOC cases and 28 655 controls from the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium and the UK Biobank. For each gene, we estimated the EOC risks and evaluated associations between germline variant status and clinical characteristics. RESULTS The ORs associated for high-grade serous ovarian cancer were 3.01 for PALB2 (95% CI 1.59 to 5.68; p=0.00068), 1.99 for POLK (95% CI 1.15 to 3.43; p=0.014) and 4.07 for SLX4 (95% CI 1.34 to 12.4; p=0.013). Deleterious mutations in FBXO10 were associated with a reduced risk of disease (OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.07 to 1.00, p=0.049). However, based on the Bayes false discovery probability, only the association for PALB2 in high-grade serous ovarian cancer is likely to represent a true positive. CONCLUSIONS We have found strong evidence that carriers of PALB2 deleterious mutations are at increased risk of high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Whether the magnitude of risk is sufficiently high to warrant the inclusion of PALB2 in cancer gene panels for ovarian cancer risk testing is unclear; much larger sample sizes will be needed to provide sufficiently precise estimates for clinical counselling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Honglin Song
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK
| | - Ed M Dicks
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK
| | - Jonathan Tyrer
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK
| | - Maria Intermaggio
- School of Women's and Children's Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Georgia Chenevix-Trench
- Cancer Genetics, Queensland Institute of Medical Research-QIMR, Herston, Queensland, Australia
| | - David D Bowtell
- Cancer Genomics and Genetics and Women's Cancer Programs, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Nadia Traficante
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Aocs Group
- QIMR Berghofer Department of Genetics and Computational Biology, Herston, Queensland, Australia
- Department of Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - James Brenton
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK
| | - Teodora Goranova
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK
| | - Karen Hosking
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK
| | - Anna Piskorz
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK
| | - Elke van Oudenhove
- Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jen Doherty
- Huntsman Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Holly R Harris
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Mary Anne Rossing
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Matthias Duerst
- Department of Gynaecology, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Thüringen, Germany
| | - Thilo Dork
- Gynaecology Research Unit, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Niedersachsen, Germany
| | - Natalia V Bogdanova
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Niedersachsen, Germany
- Department of Gynaecology, NN Alexandrov National Cancer Centre, Minsk, Minsk, Belarus
| | - Francesmary Modugno
- Womens Cancer Research Center, Magee-Womens Research Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Kirsten Moysich
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York, USA
| | - Kunle Odunsi
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York, USA
| | - Roberta Ness
- School of Public Health, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Beth Y Karlan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Women's Cancer Program at the Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Jenny Lester
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Women's Cancer Program at the Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Allan Jensen
- Department of Virus, Lifestyle and Genes, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Kobenhavn, Denmark
| | - Susanne Krüger Kjaer
- Department of Gynaecology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Kobenhavn, Denmark
| | - Estrid Høgdall
- Department of Virus, Lifestyle and Genes, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Kobenhavn, Denmark
- Department of Pathology, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Kobenhavn, Denmark
| | - Ian G Campbell
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Research, Cancer Genomics and Genetics, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Conxi Lázaro
- Hereditary Cancer Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Catalunya, Spain
| | - Miguel Angel Pujara
- Translational Research Laboratory, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Catalunya, Spain
| | - Julie Cunningham
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Robert Vierkant
- Department of Health Science Research, Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Stacey J Winham
- Department of Health Science Research, Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Michelle Hildebrandt
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Chad Huff
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Donghui Li
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Xifeng Wu
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Yao Yu
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jennifer B Permuth
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Douglas A Levine
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Gynecologic Oncology, Laura and Isaac Pearlmutter Cancer Center, New York University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Joellen M Schildkraut
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Marjorie J Riggan
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Duke University Hospital, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Andrew Berchuck
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Duke University Hospital, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Penelope M Webb
- Population Health Department, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, Queensland, Australia
| | - Opal Study Group
- Population Health Department, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, Queensland, Australia
| | - Cezary Cybulski
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Szczecin, Zachodniopomorskie, Poland
| | - Jacek Gronwald
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Szczecin, Zachodniopomorskie, Poland
| | - Anna Jakubowska
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Szczecin, Zachodniopomorskie, Poland
- Independent Laboratory of Molecular Biology and Genetic Diagnostics, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Szczecin, Zachodniopomorskie, Poland
| | - Jan Lubinski
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Szczecin, Zachodniopomorskie, Poland
| | - Jennifer Alsop
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK
| | - Patricia Harrington
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK
| | - Isaac Chan
- School of Women's and Children's Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Usha Menon
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Clinical Trials & Methodology, University College London, London, London, UK
| | - Celeste L Pearce
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Anna H Wu
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Anna de Fazio
- Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Catherine J Kennedy
- Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ellen Goode
- Department of Health Science Research, Division of Epidemiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Susan Ramus
- School of Women's and Children's Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Simon Gayther
- Center for Bioinformatics and Functional Genomics and the Cedars Sinai Genomics Core, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Paul Pharoah
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Khella CA, Mehta GA, Mehta RN, Gatza ML. Recent Advances in Integrative Multi-Omics Research in Breast and Ovarian Cancer. J Pers Med 2021; 11:149. [PMID: 33669749 PMCID: PMC7922242 DOI: 10.3390/jpm11020149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2021] [Revised: 02/13/2021] [Accepted: 02/14/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
The underlying molecular heterogeneity of cancer is responsible for the dynamic clinical landscape of this disease. The combination of genomic and proteomic alterations, including both inherited and acquired mutations, promotes tumor diversity and accounts for variable disease progression, therapeutic response, and clinical outcome. Recent advances in high-throughput proteogenomic profiling of tumor samples have resulted in the identification of novel oncogenic drivers, tumor suppressors, and signaling networks; biomarkers for the prediction of drug sensitivity and disease progression; and have contributed to the development of novel and more effective treatment strategies. In this review, we will focus on the impact of historical and recent advances in single platform and integrative proteogenomic studies in breast and ovarian cancer, which constitute two of the most lethal forms of cancer for women, and discuss the molecular similarities of these diseases, the impact of these findings on our understanding of tumor biology as well as the clinical applicability of these discoveries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christen A Khella
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ 08903, USA
| | - Gaurav A Mehta
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ 08903, USA
| | - Rushabh N Mehta
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ 08903, USA
| | - Michael L Gatza
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ 08903, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Fostira F, Papadimitriou M, Papadimitriou C. Current practices on genetic testing in ovarian cancer. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 2021; 8:1703. [PMID: 33490215 PMCID: PMC7812194 DOI: 10.21037/atm-20-1422] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is probably the tumor type with the highest percentage of hereditary cases observed, irrespectively of selection criteria. A fourth to a fifth of unselected epithelial EOC patients carry pathogenic variants (PVs) in a number of genes, the majority of which encode for proteins involved in DNA repair pathways. BRCA1 and BRCA2 predisposing PVs were the first to be associated to ovarian cancer, with the advent in DNA sequencing technologies leading to the discovery and association of additional genes which compromise the homologous recombination (HR) pathway. In addition, PVs genes involved in mismatch repair (MMR) pathway, account for 10–15% of hereditary EOC. The identification of women with HR deficient ovarian cancers has significant clinical implications concerning chemotherapy regimen planning and development and use of targeted therapies as well. More specifically, in patients with BRCA1/2 PVs or HR deficiency maintenance treatment with poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, either in the first line setting or in recurrent disease, improves the progression-free survival. But also patients with HR proficient tumors show a benefit. Therefore, genetic testing in ovarian cancer has a prognostic and predictive value. In this review, we discuss which ovarian cancer patients should be referred for genetic counseling and how to perform genetic testing. We also discuss the timing of genetic testing and its clinical relevance to BRCA status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florentia Fostira
- InRaSTES, Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory, National Centre for Scientific Research NCSR Demokritos, Athens, Greece
| | - Marios Papadimitriou
- Oncology Unit, Aretaieion University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens School of Medicine, Athens, Greece
| | - Christos Papadimitriou
- Oncology Unit, Aretaieion University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens School of Medicine, Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Daly MB, Pal T, Berry MP, Buys SS, Dickson P, Domchek SM, Elkhanany A, Friedman S, Goggins M, Hutton ML, Karlan BY, Khan S, Klein C, Kohlmann W, Kurian AW, Laronga C, Litton JK, Mak JS, Menendez CS, Merajver SD, Norquist BS, Offit K, Pederson HJ, Reiser G, Senter-Jamieson L, Shannon KM, Shatsky R, Visvanathan K, Weitzel JN, Wick MJ, Wisinski KB, Yurgelun MB, Darlow SD, Dwyer MA. Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Breast, Ovarian, and Pancreatic, Version 2.2021, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2021; 19:77-102. [DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2021.0001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 211] [Impact Index Per Article: 70.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
The NCCN Guidelines for Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Breast, Ovarian, and Pancreatic focus primarily on assessment of pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants associated with increased risk of breast, ovarian, and pancreatic cancer and recommended approaches to genetic testing/counseling and management strategies in individuals with these pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants. This manuscript focuses on cancer risk and risk management for BRCA-related breast/ovarian cancer syndrome and Li-Fraumeni syndrome. Carriers of a BRCA1/2 pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant have an excessive risk for both breast and ovarian cancer that warrants consideration of more intensive screening and preventive strategies. There is also evidence that risks of prostate cancer and pancreatic cancer are elevated in these carriers. Li-Fraumeni syndrome is a highly penetrant cancer syndrome associated with a high lifetime risk for cancer, including soft tissue sarcomas, osteosarcomas, premenopausal breast cancer, colon cancer, gastric cancer, adrenocortical carcinoma, and brain tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Tuya Pal
- 2Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center
| | - Michael P. Berry
- 3St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital/The University of Tennessee Health Science Center
| | | | - Patricia Dickson
- 5Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine
| | | | | | | | - Michael Goggins
- 9The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins
| | | | | | - Seema Khan
- 12Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Holly J. Pederson
- 22Case Comprehensive Cancer Center/University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center and Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Polaczek R, Schürmann P, Speith LM, Geffers R, Dürst M, Hillemanns P, Park-Simon TW, Liebrich C, Dörk T. Germline variation of Ribonuclease H2 genes in ovarian cancer patients. J Ovarian Res 2020; 13:146. [PMID: 33353557 PMCID: PMC7756920 DOI: 10.1186/s13048-020-00753-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2020] [Accepted: 12/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC) is a genetically heterogeneous disease that is partly driven by molecular defects in mismatch repair (MMR) or homology-directed DNA repair (HDR). Ribonuclease H2 serves to remove mis-incorporated ribonucleotides from DNA which alleviates HDR mechanisms and guides the MMR machinery. Although Ribonuclease H2 has been implicated in cancer, the role of germline variants for ovarian cancer is unknown. In the present case-control study, we sequenced the coding and flanking untranslated regions of the RNASEH2A, RNASEH2B and RNASEH2C genes, encoding all three subunits of Ribonuclease H2, in a total of 602 German patients with EOC and of 940 healthy females from the same population. We identified one patient with a truncating variant in RNASEH2B, p.C44X, resulting in a premature stop codon. This patient had high-grade serous EOC with an 8 years survival after platinum/taxane-based therapy. Subsequent analysis of TCGA data similarly showed a significantly longer progression-free survival in ovarian cancer patients with low RNASEH2B or RNASEH2C expression levels. In conclusion, loss-of-function variants in Ribonuclease H2 genes are not common predisposing factors in ovarian cancer but the possibility that they modulate therapeutic platinum response deserves further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rahel Polaczek
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Gynaecology Research Unit (OE 6411), Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, D-30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - Peter Schürmann
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Gynaecology Research Unit (OE 6411), Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, D-30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - Lisa-Marie Speith
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Gynaecology Research Unit (OE 6411), Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, D-30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - Robert Geffers
- Genome Analytics Unit, Helmholtz Institute for Infection Research, Braunschweig, Germany
| | - Matthias Dürst
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Clinics Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - Peter Hillemanns
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Gynaecology Research Unit (OE 6411), Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, D-30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - Tjoung-Won Park-Simon
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Gynaecology Research Unit (OE 6411), Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, D-30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - Clemens Liebrich
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Hospital Wolfsburg, Wolfsburg, Germany
| | - Thilo Dörk
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Gynaecology Research Unit (OE 6411), Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, D-30625, Hannover, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Crosbie EJ, Flaum N, Harkness EF, Clayton RD, Holland C, Martin-Hirsch P, Wood N, Keating P, Woodward ER, Lalloo F, Donnai P, Edmondson RJ, Evans DG. Specialist oncological surgery for removal of the ovaries and fallopian tubes in BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variant carriers may reduce primary peritoneal cancer risk to very low levels. Int J Cancer 2020; 148:1155-1163. [PMID: 33152107 PMCID: PMC7839461 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.33378] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2020] [Revised: 09/27/2020] [Accepted: 10/16/2020] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
Risk‐reducing bilateral salpingo‐oophorectomy (RRBSO) is highly effective for the prevention of high‐grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) in BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant carriers (PVCs), but does not completely eliminate future risk of primary peritoneal cancer (PPC). The requirement to completely remove fallopian tubes at RRBSO and carefully exclude occult cancer/serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC) lesions may not have been appreciated historically. We calculated rates of HGSOC and PPC in confirmed BRCA1/2 PVCs registered on the regional database in those who did (cases) and did not (controls) undergo RRBSO after genetic testing. Expected annual rates of ovarian/peritoneal cancer were 1% for BRCA1 ≥ 35 years and 0.5% for BRCA2 ≥ 45 years. Follow‐up before 35/45 years was “risk free” and lead time excluded RRBSO <35 years and <45 years for BRCA1 and BRCA2, respectively. Women were followed from personal mutation report (controls) or RRBSO (cases) to death, ovarian/peritoneal cancer or last follow‐up, whichever was sooner. In total, 891 cases (BRCA1 = 468, BRCA2 = 423) and 1302 controls had follow‐up ≥35 years (BRCA1 = 736) and ≥45 years (BRCA2 = 566), respectively, over a total of 7261.1 risk eligible years (mean = 8.15 years). Twenty‐one occult ovarian cancers were found at RRBSO (2.4%), 16 at stage 1. Post RRBSO, 56.97 ovarian/peritoneal cancers were expected but only 3 were observed (HR = 0.053; 95% CI = 0.013‐0.14), with combined Kaplan‐Meier analysis HR = 0.029 (95% CI = 0.009‐0.100, P < .001). Risk reduction was greater in specialist (HR = 0.03; 95% CI = 0.001‐0.13) compared to non‐specialist centres (HR = 0.11; 95% CI = 0.02‐0.37) (P = .07). In controls, 23.35 ovarian/peritoneal cancers were expected with 32 observed (HR = 1.37; 95% CI = 0.95‐1.91). RRBSO <35/<45 years reduces the risk of ovarian/peritoneal cancer by 95% in BRCA1/2 PVCs and may be greater in specialist centres. What's new? Women who carry genetic variants in BRCA1/2 that are linked to high‐grade serous ovarian cancer are advised to undergo risk‐reducing prophylactic bilateral salpingo‐oophorectomy (RRBSO). RRBSO, however, is associated with a significant residual risk of primary peritoneal cancer (PPC). Here, the rate of PPC following prophylactic surgery for high‐grade serous ovarian cancer was investigated among 2,193 BRCA1/2 mutation carriers who had undergone RRBSO. Estimates indicate that prophylactic surgery reduced the overall risk of PPC by 95 percent, a far greater reduction than previously described. Residual risk was lowest when RRBSO was carried out at specialist centers compared to non‐specialist centers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma J Crosbie
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Nicola Flaum
- Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.,Genetic Medicine, Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine and NW Laboratory Genetics Hub, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Elaine F Harkness
- Division of Informatics, Imaging and Data Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.,Prevention Breast Cancer Centre and Nightingale Breast Screening Centre, University Hospital of South Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Richard D Clayton
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Cathrine Holland
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Pierre Martin-Hirsch
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Royal Preston Hospital, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Preston, UK
| | - Nick Wood
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Royal Preston Hospital, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Preston, UK
| | - Patrick Keating
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Royal Preston Hospital, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Preston, UK
| | - Emma R Woodward
- Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.,Genetic Medicine, Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine and NW Laboratory Genetics Hub, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Fiona Lalloo
- Genetic Medicine, Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine and NW Laboratory Genetics Hub, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Paul Donnai
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Richard J Edmondson
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - D Gareth Evans
- Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.,Genetic Medicine, Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine and NW Laboratory Genetics Hub, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.,Prevention Breast Cancer Centre and Nightingale Breast Screening Centre, University Hospital of South Manchester, Manchester, UK.,The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.,Manchester Breast Centre, Manchester Cancer Research Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Flaum N, Morgan RD, Burghel GJ, Bulman M, Clamp AR, Hasan J, Mitchell CL, Badea D, Moon S, Hogg M, Hadjiyiannakis D, Clancy T, Schlecht H, Woodward ER, Crosbie EJ, Edmondson RJ, Wallace AJ, Jayson GC, Lalloo FI, Harkness EF, Evans DGR. Mainstreaming germline BRCA1/2 testing in non-mucinous epithelial ovarian cancer in the North West of England. Eur J Hum Genet 2020; 28:1541-1547. [PMID: 32651552 PMCID: PMC7575602 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-020-0692-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2020] [Revised: 06/14/2020] [Accepted: 06/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors improve survival in BRCA-mutant high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma. As a result, germline and somatic BRCA1/2 testing has become standard practice in women diagnosed with ovarian cancer. We outline changes in testing and detection rates of germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants (PVs) in cases of non-mucinous epithelial ovarian cancer diagnosed during three eras, spanning 12 years, within the North West of England, and compare the uptake of cascade testing in families identified by oncology-led mainstreaming versus regional genetics clinics. Eras included: Period 1 (20% risk threshold for testing): between January 2007 and May 2013; Period 2 (10% risk threshold for testing): between June 2013 and October 2017 and; Period 3 (mainstream testing): between November 2017 and November 2019. A total of 1081 women underwent germline BRCA1/2 testing between January 2007 and November 2019 and 222 (20.5%) were found to have a PV. The monthly testing rate increased by 3.3-fold and 2.5-fold between Periods 1-2 and Periods 2-3, respectively. A similar incidence of germline BRCA1/2 PVs were detected in Period 2 (17.2%) and Period 3 (18.5%). Uptake of cascade testing from first-degree relatives was significantly lower in those women undergoing mainstream testing compared with those tested in regional genetics clinics (31.6% versus 47.3%, P = 0.038). Mainstream testing allows timely detection of germline BRCA1/2 status to select patients for PARP inhibitors, but shortfalls in the uptake of cascade testing in first-degree relatives requires optimisation to broaden benefits within families.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola Flaum
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Robert D Morgan
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - George J Burghel
- St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Michael Bulman
- St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | | | | | | | - Doina Badea
- Royal Blackburn Teaching Hospital, East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust, Blackburn, UK
| | - Sarah Moon
- Rosemere Cancer Centre, Royal Preston Hospital, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, UK
| | - Martin Hogg
- Rosemere Cancer Centre, Royal Preston Hospital, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, UK
| | - Dennis Hadjiyiannakis
- Rosemere Cancer Centre, Royal Preston Hospital, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, UK
| | - Tara Clancy
- St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Helene Schlecht
- St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Emma R Woodward
- St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Emma J Crosbie
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Richard J Edmondson
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Andrew J Wallace
- St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Gordon C Jayson
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Fiona I Lalloo
- St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Elaine F Harkness
- Division of Informatics, Imaging and Data Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Genesis Breast Cancer Prevention Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - D Gareth R Evans
- St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
- Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Pavanello M, Chan IHY, Ariff A, Pharoah PDP, Gayther SA, Ramus SJ. Rare Germline Genetic Variants and the Risks of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:E3046. [PMID: 33086730 PMCID: PMC7589980 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12103046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2020] [Revised: 10/12/2020] [Accepted: 10/14/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
A family history of ovarian or breast cancer is the strongest risk factor for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Germline deleterious variants in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes confer EOC risks by age 80, of 44% and 17% respectively. The mismatch repair genes, particularly MSH2 and MSH6, are also EOC susceptibility genes. Several other DNA repair genes, BRIP1, RAD51C, RAD51D, and PALB2, have been identified as moderate risk EOC genes. EOC has five main histotypes; high-grade serous (HGS), low-grade serous (LGS), clear cell (CCC), endometrioid (END), and mucinous (MUC). This review examines the current understanding of the contribution of rare genetic variants to EOC, focussing on providing frequency data for each histotype. We provide an overview of frequency and risk for pathogenic variants in the known susceptibility genes as well as other proposed genes. We also describe the progress to-date to understand the role of missense variants and the different breast and ovarian cancer risks for each gene. Identification of susceptibility genes have clinical impact by reducing disease-associated mortality through improving risk prediction, with the possibility of prevention strategies, and developing new targeted treatments and these clinical implications are also discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marina Pavanello
- School of Women’s and Children’s Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney 2052, Australia; (M.P.); (I.H.C.); (A.A.)
- Adult Cancer Program, Lowy Cancer Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney 2052, Australia
| | - Isaac HY Chan
- School of Women’s and Children’s Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney 2052, Australia; (M.P.); (I.H.C.); (A.A.)
| | - Amir Ariff
- School of Women’s and Children’s Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney 2052, Australia; (M.P.); (I.H.C.); (A.A.)
- Adult Cancer Program, Lowy Cancer Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney 2052, Australia
| | - Paul DP Pharoah
- Strangeways Research Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK;
| | - Simon A. Gayther
- Center for Cancer Prevention and Translational Genomics, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA;
- Applied Genomics, Computation and Translational Core, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA
| | - Susan J. Ramus
- School of Women’s and Children’s Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney 2052, Australia; (M.P.); (I.H.C.); (A.A.)
- Adult Cancer Program, Lowy Cancer Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney 2052, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Pettitt SJ, Frankum JR, Punta M, Lise S, Alexander J, Chen Y, Yap TA, Haider S, Tutt ANJ, Lord CJ. Clinical BRCA1/2 Reversion Analysis Identifies Hotspot Mutations and Predicted Neoantigens Associated with Therapy Resistance. Cancer Discov 2020; 10:1475-1488. [PMID: 32699032 PMCID: PMC7611203 DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-19-1485] [Citation(s) in RCA: 88] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2019] [Revised: 04/16/2020] [Accepted: 07/01/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Reversion mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2 are associated with resistance to PARP inhibitors and platinum. To better understand the nature of these mutations, we collated, codified, and analyzed more than 300 reversions. This identified reversion "hotspots" and "deserts" in regions encoding the N and C terminus, respectively, of BRCA2, suggesting that pathogenic mutations in these regions may be at higher or lower risk of reversion. Missense and splice-site pathogenic mutations in BRCA1/2 also appeared less likely to revert than truncating mutations. Most reversions were <100 bp deletions. Although many deletions exhibited microhomology, this was not universal, suggesting that multiple DNA-repair processes cause reversion. Finally, we found that many reversions were predicted to encode immunogenic neopeptides, suggesting a route to the treatment of reverted disease. As well as providing a freely available database for the collation of future reversion cases, these observations have implications for how drug resistance might be managed in BRCA-mutant cancers. SIGNIFICANCE: Reversion mutations in BRCA genes are a major cause of clinical platinum and PARP inhibitor resistance. This analysis of all reported clinical reversions suggests that the position of BRCA2 mutations affects the risk of reversion. Many reversions are also predicted to encode tumor neoantigens, providing a potential route to targeting resistance.This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 1426.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen J Pettitt
- The CRUK Gene Function Laboratory, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.
- The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jessica R Frankum
- The CRUK Gene Function Laboratory, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
- The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Marco Punta
- Centre for Evolution and Cancer, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Stefano Lise
- Centre for Evolution and Cancer, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - John Alexander
- The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Yi Chen
- Scientific Computing Team, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Timothy A Yap
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Syed Haider
- The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew N J Tutt
- The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Christopher J Lord
- The CRUK Gene Function Laboratory, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.
- The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Watson CH, Soo L, Davidson BA, Havrilesky LJ, Lee PS, McNally LJ, Previs RA, Secord AA, Berchuck A, Kauff ND. Management of high, moderate, and low penetrance ovarian cancer susceptibility mutations: an assessment of current risk reduction practices. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2020; 30:1583-1588. [PMID: 32839226 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-001536] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2020] [Revised: 07/30/2020] [Accepted: 08/03/2020] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Limited information exists regarding risk reduction strategies for women with moderate and low penetrance ovarian cancer susceptibility mutations. We sought to assess current risk reduction practice patterns for carriers of these mutations through a survey of members of the Society of Gynecologic Oncology. METHODS Society of Gynecologic Oncology members were emailed a survey consisting of two vignettes: (1) a 35-year-old premenopausal woman; (2) a 55-year-old postmenopausal woman with comorbidities. Each vignette contained sub-scenarios in which the patient had either a BRCA1 (relative risk (RR)=30-60), RAD51C (RR=5.0), or ATM (RR=1.5-2.0) mutation. Respondents were queried about their preferred management approach. Summary statistics were performed to describe results of the survey. We used χ2 testing for statistical analyses, comparing results according to mutation type and demographic information. RESULTS A total of 193 (15%) of 1284 Society of Gynecologic Oncology members responded. For the premenopausal woman, 99%, 80%, and 40% would perform a risk reducing salpingo-oophorectomy prior to menopause in the setting of a BRCA1, RAD51C, and ATM mutation, respectively. For the postmenopausal woman, 98%, 85%, and 42% would proceed with risk reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in the setting of a BRCA1, RAD51C, and ATM mutation, respectively. Response distribution for carriers of RAD51C and ATM mutations were different from BRCA1 in both vignettes (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS Respondents were more likely to perform risk reducing salpingo-oophorectomy, in the setting of a BRCA1, RAD51C, and ATM mutation, earlier and more frequently in the setting of a BRCA1 mutation. However, there was a lack of consensus about management of the moderate and low penetrance mutations, suggesting that more data regarding age specific risks and appropriate risk reduction strategies for these alterations are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine H Watson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Lindsay Soo
- Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | | | | | - Paula S Lee
- Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Noah D Kauff
- Northwell Health Cancer Institute, Lake Success, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Morphological and molecular heterogeneity of epithelial ovarian cancer: Therapeutic implications. EJC Suppl 2020; 15:1-15. [PMID: 33240438 PMCID: PMC7573476 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcsup.2020.02.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2019] [Revised: 02/03/2020] [Accepted: 02/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Ovarian epithelial cancer (OEC) is the most lethal gynecologic malignancy. Despite current chemotherapeutic and surgical options, this high lethality can be attributed to multiple factors, including late-stage presentation. In order to optimize OEC treatment, it is important to highlight that it is composed of five main subtypes: high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC), low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (LGSOC), endometrioid ovarian carcinoma (EOC), ovarian clear cell carcinoma (CCOC), and mucinous ovarian carcinoma (MOC). These subtypes differ in their precursor lesions, as well as in epidemiological, morphological, molecular and clinical features. OEC is one of the tumours in which most pathogenic germline mutations have been identified. Accordingly, up to 20% OC show alterations in BRCA1/2 genes, and also, although with a lower frequency, in other low penetrance genes associated with homologous recombination deficiency (HRD), mismatch repair genes (Lynch syndrome) and TP53. The most important prognostic factor is the 2014 FIGO staging, while older age is also associated with worse survival. HGSOC in all stages and CCC and MOC in advanced stages have the worse prognosis among histological types. Molecular markers have emerged as prognostic factors, particularly mutations in BRCA1/2, which are associated with a better outcome. Regarding treatment, whereas a proportion of HGSOC is sensible to platinum-based treatment and PARP inhibitors due to HRD, the rest of the histological types are relatively chemoresistant. New treatments based in specific molecular alterations are being tested in different histological types. In addition, immunotherapy could be an option, especially for EOC carrying mismatch repair deficiency or POLE mutations. The five different histological types have different precursor lesions and epidemiological, morphological, genetic, epigenetic and clinical features. Histological type is an important prognostic factor. Drugs targeting homologous recombination deficiency have been approved for treatment. The use of immunotherapy is limited due to lack of predictive biomarkers
Collapse
|
41
|
Saotome K, Chiyoda T, Aimono E, Nakamura K, Tanishima S, Nohara S, Okada C, Hayashi H, Kuroda Y, Nomura H, Susumu N, Iwata T, Yamagami W, Kataoka F, Nishihara H, Aoki D. Clinical implications of next-generation sequencing-based panel tests for malignant ovarian tumors. Cancer Med 2020; 9:7407-7417. [PMID: 32813918 PMCID: PMC7571820 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.3383] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2020] [Revised: 07/23/2020] [Accepted: 07/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Precision medicine based on cancer genomics is being applied in clinical practice. However, patients do not always derive benefits from genomic testing. Here, we performed targeted amplicon exome sequencing‐based panel tests, including 160 cancer‐related genes (PleSSision‐160), on 88 malignant ovarian tumors (high‐grade serous carcinoma, 27; endometrioid carcinoma, 15; clear cell carcinoma, 30; mucinous carcinoma, 6; undifferentiated carcinoma, 4; and others, 6 (immature teratoma, 1; carcinosarcoma, 3; squamous cell carcinoma, 1; and mixed, 1)), to assess treatment strategies and useful biomarkers for malignant ovarian tumors. Overall, actionable gene variants were found in 90.9%, and druggable gene variants were found in 40.9% of the cases. Actionable BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants were found in 4.5% of each of the cases. ERBB2 amplification was found in 33.3% of mucinous carcinoma cases. Druggable hypermutation/ultramutation (tumor mutation burden ≥ 10 SNVs/Mbp) was found in 7.4% of high‐grade serous carcinoma, 46.7% of endometrioid carcinoma, 10% of clear cell carcinoma, 0% of mucinous carcinoma, 25% of undifferentiated carcinoma, and 33.3% of the other cancer cases. Copy number alterations were significantly higher in high‐grade serous carcinoma (P < .005) than in other histologic subtypes; some clear cell carcinoma showed high copy number alterations that were correlated with advanced stage (P < .05) and worse survival (P < .01). A high count of copy number alteration was associated with worse survival in all malignant ovarian tumors (P < .05). Our study shows that targeted agents can be detected in approximately 40% of malignant ovarian tumors via multigene panel testing, and copy number alteration count can be a useful marker to help assess risks in malignant ovarian tumor patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keiko Saotome
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tatsuyuki Chiyoda
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Eriko Aimono
- Genomics Unit, Keio Cancer Center, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kohei Nakamura
- Genomics Unit, Keio Cancer Center, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shigeki Tanishima
- Department of Biomedical Informatics Development, Mitsubishi Space Software Co., Ltd, Amagasaki, Japan
| | - Sachio Nohara
- Department of Biomedical Informatics Development, Mitsubishi Space Software Co., Ltd, Amagasaki, Japan
| | - Chihiro Okada
- Department of Biomedical Informatics Development, Mitsubishi Space Software Co., Ltd, Amagasaki, Japan
| | - Hideyuki Hayashi
- Genomics Unit, Keio Cancer Center, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yuka Kuroda
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Nomura
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan
| | - Nobuyuki Susumu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, International University of Health and Welfare, School of Medicine, Narita, Japan
| | - Takashi Iwata
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Wataru Yamagami
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Fumio Kataoka
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Nishihara
- Genomics Unit, Keio Cancer Center, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Daisuke Aoki
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Montfort A, Barker-Clarke RJ, Piskorz AM, Supernat A, Moore L, Al-Khalidi S, Böhm S, Pharoah P, McDermott J, Balkwill FR, Brenton JD. Combining measures of immune infiltration shows additive effect on survival prediction in high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma. Br J Cancer 2020; 122:1803-1810. [PMID: 32249277 PMCID: PMC7283353 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-020-0822-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2019] [Revised: 02/08/2020] [Accepted: 03/11/2020] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In colorectal and breast cancer, the density and localisation of immune infiltrates provides strong prognostic information. We asked whether similar automated quantitation and combined analysis of immune infiltrates could refine prognostic information in high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC) and tested associations between patterns of immune response and genomic driver alterations. METHODS Epithelium and stroma were semi-automatically segmented and the infiltration of CD45RO+, CD8+ and CD68+ cells was automatically quantified from images of 332 HGSOC patient tissue microarray cores. RESULTS Epithelial CD8 [p = 0.027, hazard ratio (HR) = 0.83], stromal CD68 (p = 3 × 10-4, HR = 0.44) and stromal CD45RO (p = 7 × 10-4, HR = 0.76) were positively associated with survival and remained so when averaged across the tumour and stromal compartments. Using principal component analysis, we identified optimised multiparameter survival models combining information from all immune markers (p = 0.016, HR = 0.88). There was no significant association between PTEN expression, type of TP53 mutation or presence of BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations and immune infiltrate densities or principal components. CONCLUSIONS Combining measures of immune infiltration provided improved survival modelling and evidence for the multiple effects of different immune factors on survival. The presence of stromal CD68+ and CD45RO+ populations was associated with survival, underscoring the benefits evaluating stromal immune populations may bring for prognostic immunoscores in HGSOC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Montfort
- Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Rowan J Barker-Clarke
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Anna Supernat
- Laboratory of Translational Oncology, Intercollegiate Faculty of Biotechnology, Medical University of Gdańsk, 80-211, Gdańsk, Poland
| | - Luiza Moore
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Steffen Böhm
- Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Paul Pharoah
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Jacqueline McDermott
- Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
- Department of Pathology, University College London Hospital, London, UK
| | | | - James D Brenton
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Cambridge, UK.
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Grandi G, Caroli M, Alboni C, Cortesi L, Toss A, Barbieri E, Botticelli L, Facchinetti F. Primary fallopian tube carcinoma (PFTC) in a BRIP-1 mutation carrier: the first case report. Fam Cancer 2020; 19:291-295. [PMID: 32328861 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-020-00179-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2020] [Accepted: 04/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Some hereditary ovarian cancer cases can be associated with a mutation of a gene involved in the DNA double-strand break repair system other than BRCA, such as BRIP1. This mutation is an emerging indication for prophylactic risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO): however, anomalous tubal pathologic lesions have not yet been reported during RRSO performed for this specific indication (BRIP1), as largely reported for BRCA mutation carriers. An asymptomatic 64-year-old woman with a family history of ovarian and breast cancer agreed to undergo RRSO for a pathogenic variant of the BRIP1 gene (heterozygous NM_032043.2: c.124delT, p. Cys42Valfs) with normal BRCA genes. Histological examination showed the presence of high-grade serous carcinoma of the fimbria of the right tube of a maximum diameter of 0.4 cm (final FIGO stage IIB). The pathogenic mechanism that leads to the development of high-grade serous ovarian/fallopian tube cancer in patients with mutations of BRIP1 should be the same as for patients with mutations of BRCA1 and 2. Our case confirms to consider BRIP1 mutation to be sufficient to justify RRSO at 45-50 years old.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanni Grandi
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences for Mother, Child and Adult, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Policlinico, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Via del Pozzo 71, 41124, Modena, Italy. .,Azienda Ospedaliero- Universitaria Policlinico, Obstetrics and Gynaecology Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Via del Pozzo 71, 41124, Modena, Italy.
| | - Martina Caroli
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences for Mother, Child and Adult, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Policlinico, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Via del Pozzo 71, 41124, Modena, Italy
| | - Carlo Alboni
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences for Mother, Child and Adult, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Policlinico, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Via del Pozzo 71, 41124, Modena, Italy
| | - Laura Cortesi
- Department of Oncology, Haematology and Respiratory Disease, Azienda Ospedaliero- Universitaria Policlinico, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Via del Pozzo 71, 41124, Modena, Italy
| | - Angela Toss
- Department of Oncology, Haematology and Respiratory Disease, Azienda Ospedaliero- Universitaria Policlinico, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Via del Pozzo 71, 41124, Modena, Italy
| | - Elena Barbieri
- Department of Oncology, Haematology and Respiratory Disease, Azienda Ospedaliero- Universitaria Policlinico, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Via del Pozzo 71, 41124, Modena, Italy
| | - Laura Botticelli
- Department of Pathology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Via del Pozzo 71, 41124, Modena, Italy
| | - Fabio Facchinetti
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences for Mother, Child and Adult, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Policlinico, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Via del Pozzo 71, 41124, Modena, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Subramanian DN, Zethoven M, McInerny S, Morgan JA, Rowley SM, Lee JEA, Li N, Gorringe KL, James PA, Campbell IG. Exome sequencing of familial high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma reveals heterogeneity for rare candidate susceptibility genes. Nat Commun 2020; 11:1640. [PMID: 32242007 PMCID: PMC7118163 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-15461-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2019] [Accepted: 03/12/2020] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
High-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC) has a significant hereditary component, approximately half of which cannot be explained by known genes. To discover genes, we analyse germline exome sequencing data from 516 BRCA1/2-negative women with HGSOC, focusing on genes enriched with rare, protein-coding loss-of-function (LoF) variants. Overall, there is a significant enrichment of rare protein-coding LoF variants in the cases (p < 0.0001, chi-squared test). Only thirty-four (6.6%) have a pathogenic variant in a known or proposed predisposition gene. Few genes have LoF mutations in more than four individuals and the majority are detected in one individual only. Forty-three highly-ranked genes are identified with three or more LoF variants that are enriched by three-fold or more compared to GnomAD. These genes represent diverse functional pathways with relatively few involved in DNA repair, suggesting that much of the remaining heritability is explained by previously under-explored genes and pathways.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deepak N Subramanian
- Cancer Genetics Laboratory, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia
| | - Magnus Zethoven
- Bioinformatics Core Facility, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia
| | - Simone McInerny
- The Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia
| | - James A Morgan
- The Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia
| | - Simone M Rowley
- Cancer Genetics Laboratory, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia
| | - Jue Er Amanda Lee
- Cancer Genetics Laboratory, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia
| | - Na Li
- Cancer Genetics Laboratory, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia
| | - Kylie L Gorringe
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia
| | - Paul A James
- Cancer Genetics Laboratory, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia
- The Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia
| | - Ian G Campbell
- Cancer Genetics Laboratory, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia.
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Abildgaard C, Do Canto LM, Steffensen KD, Rogatto SR. Long Non-coding RNAs Involved in Resistance to Chemotherapy in Ovarian Cancer. Front Oncol 2020; 9:1549. [PMID: 32039022 PMCID: PMC6985280 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2019.01549] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2019] [Accepted: 12/20/2019] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Ovarian cancer (OC) accounts for more than 150,000 deaths worldwide every year. Patients are often diagnosed at an advanced stage with metastatic dissemination. Although platinum- and taxane-based chemotherapies are effective treatment options, they are rarely curative and eventually, the disease will progress due to acquired resistance. Emerging evidence suggests a crucial role of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) in the response to therapy in OC. Transcriptome profiling studies using high throughput approaches have identified differential expression patterns of lncRNAs associated with disease recurrence. Furthermore, several aberrantly expressed lncRNAs in resistant OC cells have been related to increased cell division, improved DNA repair, up-regulation of drug transporters or reduced susceptibility to apoptotic stimuli, supporting their involvement in acquired resistance. In this review, we will discuss the key aspects of lncRNAs associated with the development of resistance to platinum- and taxane-based chemotherapy in OC. The molecular landscape of OC will be introduced, to provide a background for understanding the role of lncRNAs in the acquisition of malignant properties. We will focus on the interplay between lncRNAs and molecular pathways affecting drug response to evaluate their impact on treatment resistance. Additionally, we will discuss the prospects of using lncRNAs as biomarkers or targets for precision medicine in OC. Although there is still plenty to learn about lncRNAs and technical challenges to be solved, the evidence of their involvement in OC and the development of acquired resistance are compelling and warrant further investigation for clinical applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cecilie Abildgaard
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Lillebaelt Hospital-University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Oncology, Lillebaelt Hospital-University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark.,Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Luisa M Do Canto
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Lillebaelt Hospital-University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark
| | - Karina D Steffensen
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Lillebaelt Hospital-University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark.,Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Silvia R Rogatto
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Lillebaelt Hospital-University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark.,Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Sun HB, Wang HY, Wu B, Wang ZF, Wang LZ, Li FQ, Wu JD, Zhang LN. The inhibitory effects of cisplatin-radiation combination treatment on malignant osteosarcoma MG-63 cells and BRCA1-p53 pathways are more efficient than single treatments. Oncol Lett 2019; 18:6385-6396. [PMID: 31807162 PMCID: PMC6876329 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2019.11019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2018] [Accepted: 08/22/2019] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
The poor prognosis of patients with osteosarcoma remains a persistent problem, in particular for patients with unresectable tumors or metastasis. Therefore, combination of radiotherapy and chemotherapy has been considered for patients with metastasis or recurrence, patients unsuitable for surgery and patients refusing surgery. The present study aimed to investigate the effect of the combined treatment with cisplatin and radiation therapy on the biological characteristics of the osteosarcoma cell line MG-63 and the breast cancer 1 (BRCA1)-associated signaling pathways. Cell proliferation was determined using Cell Counting kit-8 assay, and cell apoptosis and cell cycle were assessed by flow cytometry. Cell migration was examined by Transwell assay. The mRNA and protein expression levels of candidate genes, including BRCA1 and p53, were determined by reverse transcription-quantitative PCR and western blotting, respectively. The results demonstrated that combined treatment with radiation and cisplatin significantly inhibited MG-63 cell proliferation compared with radiation or cisplatin treatment alone. Furthermore, radiation, cisplatin or the combined treatment with radiation and cisplatin increased the apoptosis rate of MG-63 cells, which resulted in G2 phase arrest, and significantly decreased the migratory capacity of MG-63 cells. In addition, the apoptosis rate of MG-63 cells following combined radiation and cisplatin treatment was higher compared with the cisplatin group, but lower compared with the radiation group. Furthermore, combined treatment with radiation and cisplatin decreased the mRNA and protein expression levels of BRCA1 and p53. Additionally, combined treatment with radiation and cisplatin had a more potent inhibitory effect on p53 expression than on BRCA1 expression. In addition, combination of radiation and cisplatin had a higher inhibitory effect on Bax protein level and a higher inductive effect on Bcl-2 protein level compared with treatments with radiation and cisplatin alone. The results demonstrated that combined treatment of radiation and cisplatin exhibited superior therapeutic effects on osteosarcoma MG-63 cells compared with radiation or cisplatin treatment alone, which may be mediated by the BRCA1-p53 signaling pathway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hong-Bin Sun
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin 130033, P.R. China
| | - He-Yuan Wang
- Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin 130021, P.R. China
| | - Bing Wu
- Department of Neurosurgery, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin 130033, P.R. China
| | - Zhong-Feng Wang
- Department of Hepatology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin 130021, P.R. China
| | - Li-Zhe Wang
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin 130021, P.R. China
| | - Fu-Qiang Li
- Eye Center of The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin 130041, P.R. China
| | - Jun-Duo Wu
- Department of Cardiology, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin 130041, P.R. China
| | - Le-Ning Zhang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin 130033, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Challenging the believed proportion of ovarian cancer attributable to BRCA2 versus BRCA1 pathogenic variants. Eur J Cancer 2019; 124:88-90. [PMID: 31760313 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.10.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2019] [Revised: 09/23/2019] [Accepted: 10/06/2019] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
48
|
Manchana T, Phowthongkum P, Teerapakpinyo C. Germline mutations in Thai patients with nonmucinous epithelial ovarian cancer. World J Clin Oncol 2019; 10:358-368. [PMID: 31815095 PMCID: PMC6895001 DOI: 10.5306/wjco.v10.i11.358] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2019] [Revised: 08/13/2019] [Accepted: 11/05/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Genetic testing is widely recommended for all epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) patients. However, an increased probability of identifying germline mutations has been reported in selected patients with risk factors such as a family history or personal history of cancer and high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) subtype. HGSC has been reported to be the most common subtype of EOC worldwide (approximately 70%). However, this subtype is less prevalent in Thai patients (reported as only 20%). The difference in the distribution of various subtypes of EOC may reflect the incidence of germline mutations in Thai EOC patients.
AIM To evaluate the frequencies of germline mutations in EOC patients and to compare the frequencies in those with and without clinical risk factors for hereditary ovarian cancer.
METHODS This cross-sectional study included 112 nonmucinous EOC patients who underwent primary surgery at our tertiary care hospital. Clinical risk factors for hereditary ovarian cancer were defined as follows: Age below 40 years, a significant family history of cancer, synchronous ovarian and endometrial cancer, and HGSC. Comprehensive germline mutations were detected by next-generation sequencing.
RESULTS Of a total of 112 patients, 82 (73.2%) patients had ≥ 1 risk factor and 30 (26.8%) patients had no risk factors. Germline mutations were detected in 26 patients: 20 (17.8%) patients had BRCA1/2 mutations, but 6 (5.4%) patients had mutations in other genes, including 1 in MLH1, 1 in MSH2, 1 in RAD51C, 2 in ATM and 1 in CDH1. Germline mutations were only detected in patients with risk factors (26 of 82, 31.7%), not in patients without risk factors (P < 0.001). A significant family history of cancer and HGSC were the only two significant risk factors associated with a higher proportion of germline mutations (56.3% vs 10% for those with and without a history of cancer, respectively, 40.8% vs 9.5% for those with and without HGSC). Germline BRCA mutations were detected in 38.8% of patients with HGSC but in only 1.6% of those with non-HGSC. An age below 40 years, personal history of breast cancer, and synchronous ovarian and endometrial cancer were not significant factors (14.3% vs 23.5%, 33.3% vs 21%, 22.2% vs 22.3%).
CONCLUSION Approximately one-third of EOC patients with risk factors had germline mutations. Almost all germline BRCA mutations were found in patients with the HGSC subtype. Selected patients with HGSC and a family history of cancer should be initially considered for genetic analysis in Thailand.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tarinee Manchana
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
| | - Prasit Phowthongkum
- Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and Medical Genetics Center, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
| | - Chinachote Teerapakpinyo
- Chulalongkorn GenePRO Center, Research Affairs, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Arason A, Agnarsson BA, Johannesdottir G, Johannsson OT, Hilmarsdottir B, Reynisdottir I, Barkardottir RB. The BRCA1 c.4096+3A>G Variant Displays Classical Characteristics of Pathogenic BRCA1 Mutations in Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancers, But Still Allows Homozygous Viability. Genes (Basel) 2019; 10:E882. [PMID: 31683985 PMCID: PMC6896150 DOI: 10.3390/genes10110882] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2019] [Revised: 10/04/2019] [Accepted: 10/29/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Mutations in BRCA1 result in predisposal to breast and ovarian cancers, but many variants exist with unknown clinical significance (VUS). One is BRCA1 c.4096+3A>G, which affects production of the full-length BRCA1 transcript, while augmenting transcripts lacking most or all of exon 11. Nonetheless, homozygosity of this variant has been reported in a healthy woman. We saw this variant cosegregate with breast and ovarian cancer in several family branches of four Icelandic pedigrees, with instances of phenocopies and a homozygous woman with lung cancer. We found eight heterozygous carriers (0.44%) in 1820 unselected breast cancer cases, and three (0.15%) in 1968 controls (p = 0.13). Seeking conclusive evidence, we studied tumors from carriers in the pedigrees for wild-type-loss of heterozygosity (wtLOH) and BRCA1-characteristic prevalence of estrogen receptor (ER) negativity. Of 15 breast and six ovarian tumors, wtLOH occurred in nine breast and all six ovarian tumours, and six of the nine breast tumors with wtLOH were ER-negative. These data accord with a pathogenic BRCA1-mutation. Our findings add to the current knowledge of BRCA1, and the role of its exon 11 in cancer pathogenicity, and will be of use in clinical genetic counselling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adalgeir Arason
- Department of Pathology, Landspitali - The National University Hospital of Iceland, 101 Reykjavik, Iceland.
- BMC (Biomedical Center), Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, 101 Reykjavik, Iceland.
| | - Bjarni A Agnarsson
- Department of Pathology, Landspitali - The National University Hospital of Iceland, 101 Reykjavik, Iceland.
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, 101 Reykjavik, Iceland.
| | - Gudrun Johannesdottir
- Department of Pathology, Landspitali - The National University Hospital of Iceland, 101 Reykjavik, Iceland.
| | - Oskar Th Johannsson
- BMC (Biomedical Center), Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, 101 Reykjavik, Iceland.
- Department of Oncology, Landspitali, The National University Hospital of Iceland, 101 Reykjavik, Iceland.
| | - Bylgja Hilmarsdottir
- Department of Pathology, Landspitali - The National University Hospital of Iceland, 101 Reykjavik, Iceland.
- BMC (Biomedical Center), Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, 101 Reykjavik, Iceland.
| | - Inga Reynisdottir
- Department of Pathology, Landspitali - The National University Hospital of Iceland, 101 Reykjavik, Iceland.
- BMC (Biomedical Center), Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, 101 Reykjavik, Iceland.
| | - Rosa B Barkardottir
- Department of Pathology, Landspitali - The National University Hospital of Iceland, 101 Reykjavik, Iceland.
- BMC (Biomedical Center), Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, 101 Reykjavik, Iceland.
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Paradiso AV, Digennaro M, Patruno M, De Summa S, Tommasi S, Berindan-Neagoe I. BRCA germline mutation test for all woman with ovarian cancer? BMC Cancer 2019; 19:641. [PMID: 31253107 PMCID: PMC6599356 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-019-5829-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2018] [Accepted: 06/12/2019] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Delivering widespread BRCA testing to patients with ovarian cancer has been suggested by several scientists, recommended by professional societies and solicited by patients organizations. However, based on the lack of studies clearly demonstrating the cost-effectiveness of such approach compared to standard practice, we evaluated the possibility to better select subgroups of ovarian cancer (OC) patients with higher probability to be a BRCA mutation carrier’. Methods We analyzed the database of 2222 germline BRCA analyses from OC patients recently published by Song et al. (Song 2014) by applying multivariate and conditional inference regression tree-analyses. Results Overall, 178/2192 (8.1%) evaluable OC women showed pathogenic germline mutations in BRCA genes (84 BRCA1;94 BRCA2). BRCA mutations resulted significantly more frequent in Epithelial tumors (10.7%), less differentiated tumours (11.0%) and younger subjects (13.4%). Regression tree analysis permitted to individualize a subset of 66% OC patients with particularly low risk (3.5%) to carry a BRCA mutation vs a subgroup (24% of the series), with a probability higher than 17% to carry a pathogenic mutation. Younger age, OC and Breast Cancer family history were confirmed powerful factors in selecting subgroups of patients with significantly different BRCA mutation probability. Conclusions Our regression tree-analysis can represent an innovative approach taking into consideration all main clinical pathological information to select OC patients to be candidated for BRCA test.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A V Paradiso
- Experimental Oncology - Center for Study of Heredo-Familial Tumors, IRCCS-Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II", viale Orazio Flacco, 65, 70124, Bari, Italy. .,Centro Studi Tumori Eredo-Familiari, Istituto Tumori G Paolo II IRCCS National Cancer Research Centre, Via O Flacco, 65, 70124, Bari, Italy.
| | - M Digennaro
- Experimental Oncology - Center for Study of Heredo-Familial Tumors, IRCCS-Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II", viale Orazio Flacco, 65, 70124, Bari, Italy
| | - M Patruno
- Experimental Oncology - Center for Study of Heredo-Familial Tumors, IRCCS-Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II", viale Orazio Flacco, 65, 70124, Bari, Italy
| | - S De Summa
- Molecular and Pharmacogenetics Diagnostic Laboratory, IRCCS-Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II", viale Orazio Flacco, 65, 70124, Bari, Italy
| | - S Tommasi
- Molecular and Pharmacogenetics Diagnostic Laboratory, IRCCS-Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II", viale Orazio Flacco, 65, 70124, Bari, Italy
| | - I Berindan-Neagoe
- Department of Functional Genomics and Experimental Pathology, The Oncology Institute "Prof. Dr. Ion Chiricuta", University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iuliu Hatieganu- Center for Functional Genomics and Center for Advanced Medicine Medfuture, Republicii 34th street; Marinescu 23, Pasteur 4-6, 400015, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| |
Collapse
|