Blastocyst biopsy versus cleavage stage biopsy and blastocyst transfer for preimplantation genetic diagnosis of β-thalassaemia: a pilot study

A study on methods for preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) on in vivo- and in vitro-produced equine embryos, with emphasis on embryonic sex determination

Two methods for preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) have been described for equine embryos: trophoblast cell biopsy (TCB) or blastocoele fluid aspiration (BFA). While TCB is widely applied for both in vivo- and in vitro-produced embryos, BFA has been mostly utilized for in vivo-produced embryos. Alternative methods for PGT, including analysis of cell-free DNA (CFD) in the medium where in vitro-produced embryos are cultured, have been reported in humans but not for equine embryos. In Experiment 1, in vivo- (n = 10) and in vitro-produced (n = 13) equine embryos were subjected to BFA, cultured for 24 h, then subjected to TCB, and cultured for additional 24 h. No detrimental effect on embryonic diameter or re-expansion rates was observed for either embryo group (P > 0.05). In Experiment 2, the concordance (i.e., agreement on detecting the same embryonic sex using two techniques) among BFA, TCB, and the whole embryo (Whole) was studied by detecting the sex-determining region Y (SRY) or testis-specific y-encoded protein 1 (TSPY) (Y-chromosome), and androgen receptor (AR; X-chromosome) genes using PCR. Overall, a higher concordance for detecting embryonic sex was observed among techniques for in vivo-produced embryos (67-100 %; n = 14 embryos) than for in vitro-produced embryos (31-92 %; n = 13 embryos). The concordance between sample types increased when utilizing TSPY (77-100 %) instead of SRY (31-100 %) as target gene. In Experiment 3, CFD analysis was performed on in vitro-produced embryos to determine embryonic sex via PCR (SRY [Y-chromosome] and amelogenin - AMEL [X- and Y-chromosomes]). Overall, CFD was detected in all medium samples, and the concordance between CFD sample and the whole embryo was 60 % when utilizing SRY and AMEL genes. In conclusion, equine embryos can be subjected to two biopsy procedures (24 h apart) without apparent detrimental effects on embryonic size. For in vivo-, but not for in vitro-produced equine embryos, BFA can be considered a potential alternative to TCB for PGT. Finally, CFD can be further explored as a non-invasive method for PGT in in vitro produced equine embryos.

Updates in preimplantation genetic testing (PGT)

Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) involves taking a biopsy of an early embryo created through in vitro fertilisation (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Genetic testing is performed on the biopsy, in order to select which embryo to transfer. PGT began as an experimental procedure in the 1990s, but is now an integral part of assisted human reproduction (AHR). PGT allows for embryo selection which can reduce the risk of transmission of inherited disease and may reduce the chance of implantation failure and pregnancy loss. This is a rapidly evolving area, which raises important ethical issues. This review article aims to give a brief history of PGT, an overview of the current evidence in PGT along with highlighting exciting areas of research to advance this technology.

Preimplantation genetic testing in the current era, a review

BACKGROUND

Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT), also referred to as preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD), is an advanced reproductive technology used during in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles to identify genetic abnormalities in embryos prior to their implantation. PGT is used to screen embryos for chromosomal abnormalities, monogenic disorders, and structural rearrangements.

DEVELOPMENT OF PGT

Over the past few decades, PGT has undergone tremendous development, resulting in three primary forms: PGT-A, PGT-M, and PGT-SR. PGT-A is utilized for screening embryos for aneuploidies, PGT-M is used to detect disorders caused by a single gene, and PGT-SR is used to detect chromosomal abnormalities caused by structural rearrangements in the genome.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In this review, we thoroughly summarized and reviewed PGT and discussed its pros and cons down to the minutest aspects. Additionally, recent studies that highlight the advancements of PGT in the current era, including their future perspectives, were reviewed.

CONCLUSIONS

This comprehensive review aims to provide new insights into the understanding of techniques used in PGT, thereby contributing to the field of reproductive genetics.

PGT and deferred embryo transfer: Is blastocyst biopsy more effective than cleaved embryo biopsy?

OBJECTIVE

Blastocyst biopsy has recently been implemented in our laboratory for PGT with a "freeze all" indication. The aim of this study is to compare PGT results between embryos biopsied at the cleaved and embryos biopsied at the blastocyst stage.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a retrospective cohort study conducted from January 2017 to December 2022 in France. All couples with a "freeze all" indication the day of hCG trigerring during the study period were included in the study. Patients were retrospectively assigned in one group of two groups based on the day of embryo biopsy: the cleavage group if a blastomere biopsy was performed on day 3/4 or the blastocyst group if a trophectoderm biopsy was performed on day 5/6. We evaluated and compared the results between the two groups for biological parameters and clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

In total, 325 PGT cycles (291 patients) were included in our study. Frozen-thawed embryo transfer was performed for 285 cycles, 122 in the blastocyst group and 163 in the cleavage group. The number of biopsied embryos per cycle is significantly higher in the cleavage group with a mean of 7.2 ± 4.1 embryos biopsied per cycle vs. 2.9 ± 2.8 embryos in the blastocyst group (p < 0.001). The rate of the useful embryos was similar between the two groups with 14.6 % of frozen healthy embryos among the 1352 cleaved embryos obtained in blastocyst group, compared to 17.1 % in the cleavage group. No significant differences in clinical pregnancy rate per transfer and implantation rate were observed between the blastocyst and cleavage groups (36.4% vs. 40.4 % and 33.1% vs. 33.2 % respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

For "freeze all" PGT cycles, the day of embryo biopsy (cleaved vs blastocyst biopsy) does not impact pregnancy outcomes. Knowing how to perform embryo biopsy at different stages helps to better organize daily laboratory activity and to rescue some undiagnosed embryos after day 3 biopsy.

Impact of trophectoderm biopsy for preimplantation genetic testing on obstetric and neonatal outcomes: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate whether trophectoderm biopsy for preimplantation genetic testing is associated with an increased risk of adverse obstetrical and neonatal outcomes compared with conventional in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection without preimplantation genetic testing.

DATA SOURCES

Entries between January 1990 and August 2022 were searched using MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Publications comparing the outcomes of pregnancies after preimplantation genetic testing using trophectoderm biopsy and in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection were included. Only human studies with a cohort or case-control design or randomized controlled trials were eligible for inclusion.

METHODS

The study selection process was performed independently by 2 investigators. The quality of the observational studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool version 2 was used to grade the level of bias in randomized controlled trials. The pooled odds ratio and 95% confidence interval were calculated using a random-effects model when substantial heterogeneity occurred (indicated by I2 of >50% and P<.1). Otherwise, a fixed-effects model was used.

RESULTS

This meta-analysis included 13 studies involving 11,469 live births after preimplantation genetic testing treatment with trophectoderm biopsy before embryo transfer and 20,438 live births after in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection only. The odds ratio of preterm delivery was higher in the trophectoderm-biopsied group than in the routine in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection group (pooled odds ratio, 1.12; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-1.21); however, the difference did not exist after sensitivity analysis (odds ratio, 0.97; 95% confidence interval, 0.84-1.11). The risk of low birthweight did not increase among the biopsied pregnancies (pooled odds ratio, 1.01; 95% confidence interval, 0.85-1.20). No marked difference was observed in the risk of other obstetrical or neonatal outcomes between the biopsy and control groups. Furthermore, no difference was noted in the perinatal outcomes between trophectoderm-biopsied and nonbiopsied groups in the subgroup analyses by intracytoplasmic sperm injection, frozen-thawed transfer, or single embryo transfer.

CONCLUSION

Trophectoderm biopsy for preimplantation genetic testing treatment did not alter the risk of obstetrical or neonatal outcomes compared with conventional in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection without preimplantation genetic testing. However, this study was limited by the large observational evidence base, and more randomized controlled trials are needed to further confirm these findings.

Pregnancies through oocyte donation. A mini review of pathways involved in placental dysfunction

Pregnancies resulting from assisted reproductive techniques (ART) are increasingly prevalent worldwide. While most pregnancies conceived through in-vitro fertilization (IVF) progress without complications, mounting evidence suggests that these pregnancies are at a heightened risk of adverse perinatal outcomes. Specifically, IVF pregnancies involving oocyte donation have garnered attention due to numerous reports indicating an elevated risk profile for pregnancy-related complications within this subgroup of patients. The precise mechanisms contributing to this increased risk of complications remain incompletely understood. Nonetheless, it is likely that they are mediated by an abnormal immune response at the fetal-maternal interface. Additionally, these outcomes may be influenced by baseline patient characteristics, such as the etiology of infertility, absence of corpus luteum, and variations in endometrial preparation protocols, among other factors. This review aims to succinctly summarize the most widely accepted mechanisms that potentially contribute to the onset of placental dysfunction in pregnancies conceived through oocyte donation.

Fertility and Pregnancy in Women with Transfusion-Dependent Thalassemia

Because women with transfusion-dependent thalassemia are seeking pregnancy, ensuring the best outcomes for both mother and baby require concerted and collaborative efforts between the hematologist, obstetrician, cardiologist, hepatologist, and genetic counselor among others. Proactive counseling, early fertility evaluation, optimal management of iron overload and organ function, and application of advances in reproductive technology and prenatal screening are important in ensuring a healthy outcome. Many unanswered questions remain requiring further study, including fertility preservation, non-invasive prenatal diagnosis, chelation therapy during pregnancy, and indications and duration of anticoagulation.

Day 5 versus day 3 embryo biopsy for preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic/single gene defects

BACKGROUND

Assisted reproductive technology (ART) has allowed couples with a family history of a monogenic genetic disease, or a disease-carrying gene, to reduce the chance of them having a child with the genetic disorder. This is achieved by genetically testing the embryos using an advanced process called preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic or single gene disorders (PGT-M), such as Huntington's disease or cystic fibrosis. This current terminology (PGT-M) has replaced the formerly-known preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD). During PGT-M, one or more embryo cells are biopsied and analysed for genetic or chromosomal anomalies before transferring the embryos to the endometrial cavity. Biopsy for PGT-M can be performed at day 3 of cleavage-stage embryo development when the embryo is at the six- to the eight-cell stage, with either one or two blastomeres being removed for analysis. Biopsy for PGT-M can also be performed on day 5 of the blastocyst stage of embryo development when the embryo has 80 to 100 cells, with five to six cells being removed for analysis. Day 5 biopsy has taken over from day 3 biopsy as the most widely-used biopsy technique; however, there is a lack of summarised evidence from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that assesses the effectiveness and safety of day 5 biopsy compared to day 3 biopsy. Since biopsy is an invasive process, whether it is carried out at day 3 or day 5 of embryo development may have different impacts on further development, implantation, pregnancy, live birth and perinatal outcomes.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the benefits and harms of day 5 embryo biopsy, in comparison to day 3 biopsy, in PGT-M in women undergoing in vitro fertilisation (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the following electronic bibliographic databases in December 2021 to identify relevant RCTs: the Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Group (CGFG) Specialised Trials Register; CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and PsycINFO. We also handsearched grey literature, such as trial registers, relevant journals, reference lists, Google Scholar, and published conference abstracts.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Eligible RCTs compared day 5 versus day 3 embryo biopsy for PGT-M.  DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard methodological procedures recommended by Cochrane. The primary review outcomes were live births and miscarriages. We calculated outcomes per woman/couple randomised and reported odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

MAIN RESULTS

We included one RCT involving 20 women. The evidence was of very low certainty; the main limitations of the study were serious risk of bias due to lack of blinding of study personnel, and imprecision. We are uncertain whether day 5 embryo biopsy compared to day 3 biopsy has an effect on live births (OR 1.50, 95% CI 0.26 to 8.82; 1 RCT, 20 women; very low-certainty evidence). The evidence suggests that if the chance of live birth following day 3 biopsy was assumed to be 40%, then the chance with day 5 biopsy is between 15% and 85%. It is also uncertain whether day 5 embryo biopsy compared to day 3 biopsy has an effect on miscarriages (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.05 to 18.57; 1 RCT, 20 women; very low-certainty evidence).  We are uncertain whether day 5 embryo biopsy compared to day 3 biopsy has an effect on other secondary outcome measures, including viable intrauterine pregnancies (OR 2.25, 95% CI 0.38 to 13.47; 1 RCT, 20 women; very low-certainty evidence), ectopic pregnancies (OR 0.16, 95% CI 0.01 to 3.85; 1 RCT, 20 women; very low-certainty evidence), stillbirths (OR not estimable as no events in either group; 1 RCT, 20 women; very low-certainty evidence) or termination of pregnancies (OR 3.32, 95% CI 0.12 to 91.60; 1 RCT, 20 women; very low-certainty evidence). No studies reported on gestational age at birth, birthweight, neonatal mortality and major congenital anomaly.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We are uncertain if there is a difference in live births and miscarriages, viable intrauterine pregnancies, ectopic pregnancies, stillbirths or termination of pregnancies between day 5 and day 3 embryo biopsy for PGT-M. There was insufficient evidence to draw any conclusions regarding other adverse outcomes. The results should be interpreted with caution, as the evidence was of very low certainty due to limited studies, high risk of bias in the included study, and an overall low level of precision.

Exploration of the interchromosomal effects in preimplantation genetic testing for structural rearrangements based on next-generation sequencing

BACKGROUND

To investigate the interchromosomal effect (ICE) in chromosome translocation carriers.

METHODS

Data on preimplantation genetic testing aneuploidy and structural rearrangements (translocation) were retrospectively collected and classified into a reciprocal translocation group, a Robertsonian translocation group and a control group. According to the carrier's gender and age, all cases underwent further subgroup difference analysis of de novo abnormal embryo rates and the number of chromosomes involved in de novo abnormal embryos.

RESULTS

Among the 283 couples who participated in this study, 1076 blastocysts from 352 cycles were collected, and 246 de novo abnormal embryos were included. There was a significant difference in the rate of de novo abnormal embryos among the three groups (p < .05) but no significant difference in the number of de novo abnormal chromosomes in the abnormal embryos (p > .05). Gender and age (classified by 35 years old) had no effect on the de novo abnormal embryo ratios among the translocation carriers (p > .05). However, the de novo abnormal ratio increased with age. The embryo constitution reflected no significant difference between the translocation groups (p > .05).

CONCLUSION

The ICE was detected for the translocation carriers. The de novo abnormal embryo ratio increased with age. Gender had no effect on the de novo abnormal embryo ratio. Translocation status played a more important role than age and gender.

Whole Genome Amplification in Preimplantation Genetic Testing in the Era of Massively Parallel Sequencing

Successful whole genome amplification (WGA) is a cornerstone of contemporary preimplantation genetic testing (PGT). Choosing the most suitable WGA technique for PGT can be particularly challenging because each WGA technique performs differently in combination with different downstream processing and detection methods. The aim of this review is to provide insight into the performance and drawbacks of DOP-PCR, MDA and MALBAC, as well as the hybrid WGA techniques most widely used in PGT. As the field of PGT is moving towards a wide adaptation of comprehensive massively parallel sequencing (MPS)-based approaches, we especially focus our review on MPS parameters and detection opportunities of WGA-amplified material, i.e., mappability of reads, uniformity of coverage and its influence on copy number variation analysis, and genomic coverage and its influence on single nucleotide variation calling. The ability of MDA-based WGA solutions to better cover the targeted genome and the ability of PCR-based solutions to provide better uniformity of coverage are highlighted. While numerous comprehensive PGT solutions exploiting different WGA types and adjusted bioinformatic pipelines to detect copy number and single nucleotide changes are available, the ones exploiting MDA appear more advantageous. The opportunity to fully analyse the targeted genome is influenced by the MPS parameters themselves rather than the solely chosen WGA.

A novel trophectoderm biopsy technique for all blastocyst stages

Purpose

This study was conducted to assess the effectiveness of a new trophectoderm (TE) biopsy method that does not require prior opening of the zona pellucida at the blastocyst stage.

Methods

TE biopsy was conducted using a modified extrusion method for embryos during the cleavage stage. In this method, culture medium was injected into the perivitelline space to help extrude TE cells from the zona pellucida before TE biopsy.

Results

Our extrusion method preserves the embryo culture environment until immediately before biopsy because it does not require opening of the zona pellucida prior to TE biopsy. Furthermore, this method does not require a waiting time for blastocyst hatching after laser irradiation, thereby minimizing damage to the embryos and maintaining the time schedule of culture operations.

Conclusions

TE biopsy using this novel extrusion method may be useful in various applications, including the collection of TE cells for next-generation sequencing analysis.

Perinatal Outcomes of Singleton Live Births Following Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Chromosomal Structural Rearrangements in Single Frozen-Thawed Blastocyst Transfer Cycles: a Retrospective Cohort Study

This study investigated whether singleton pregnancies conceived after preimplantation genetic testing for chromosomal structural rearrangements (PGT-SR) are associated with a higher risk of adverse perinatal outcomes than singleton pregnancies conceived after intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). We collected data on singleton live births after PGT-SR (n = 107) and ICSI (n = 585) in our hospital from January 2017 to August 2020. Multivariable analyses were used to adjust for maternal age, body mass index, gravidity and parity, paternal age, ovulatory disorder, and recurrent spontaneous abortion. The unadjusted results showed a significantly higher risk of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) (odds ratio (OR) = 2.47; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.10-5.54; P = 0.029) associated with PGT-SR singleton pregnancies than with ICSI singleton pregnancies. However, after adjusting for potential confounders, there were no longer any significant differences in the risk of HDP (adjusted OR = 2.24; 95% CI: 0.92-5.48; P = 0.077) between PGT-SR and ICSI singleton pregnancies. There were no significant differences between PGT-SR and ICSI singleton pregnancies in terms of gestational diabetes, preterm premature rupture of membranes, placenta previa, cesarean delivery, gestational age (weeks), preterm delivery (< 37 weeks), very preterm delivery (≥ 28 weeks and < 32 weeks), birth weight (g), low birth weight (< 2500 g), very low birth weight (< 1500 g), birth height (cm), birth defects, and 1-min and 5-min Apgar scores. In conclusion, for single frozen-thawed blastocyst cycles, there were no significant differences in adverse perinatal outcomes between PGT-SR and ICSI singleton pregnancies. However, due to the limited sample size, these conclusions need to be confirmed by further studies.

Obstetric and neonatal outcomes of pregnancies resulting from preimplantation genetic testing: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) includes methods that allow embryos to be tested for severe inherited diseases or chromosomal abnormalities. In addition to IVF/ICSI and repeated freezing and thawing of the embryos, PGT requires a biopsy to obtain embryonic genetic material for analysis. However, the potential effects of PGT on obstetric and neonatal outcomes are currently uncertain.

OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE

This study aimed to investigate whether pregnancies conceived after PGT were associated with a higher risk of adverse obstetric and neonatal outcomes compared with spontaneously conceived (SC) pregnancies or pregnancies conceived after IVF/ICSI.

SEARCH METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Web of Science and The Cochrane Library entries from January 1990 to January 2021 were searched. The primary outcomes in this study were low birth weight (LBW) and congenital malformations (CMs), and the secondary outcomes included gestational age, preterm delivery (PTD), very preterm delivery (VPTD), birth weight (BW), very low birth weight (VLBW), neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP), gestational diabetes, placenta previa and preterm premature rupture of membranes (PROM). We further pooled the results of PGT singleton pregnancies. Subgroup analyses included preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD), preimplantation genetic screening (PGS), cleavage-stage biopsy combined with fresh embryo transfer (CB-ET) and blastocyst biopsy combined with frozen-thawed embryo transfer (BB-FET).

OUTCOMES

This meta-analysis included 15 studies involving 3682 babies born from PGT pregnancies, 127 719 babies born from IVF/ICSI pregnancies and 915 222 babies born from SC pregnancies. The relative risk (RR) of LBW was higher in PGT pregnancies compared with SC pregnancies (RR = 3.95, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.32-6.72), but the risk of CMs was not different between the two groups. The pooled results for the risks of LBW and CMs were similar in PGT and IVF/ICSI pregnancies. The risks of PTD (RR = 3.12, 95% CI: 2.67-3.64) and HDP (RR = 3.12, 95% CI: 2.18-4.47) were significantly higher in PGT pregnancies compared with SC pregnancies. Lower gestational age (mean difference [MD] = -0.76 weeks, 95% CI -1.17 to -0.34) and BW (MD = -163.80 g, 95% CI: -299.35 to -28.24) were also noted for PGT pregnancies compared with SC pregnancies. Nevertheless, compared with IVF/ICSI pregnancies, the risks of VPTD and VLBW in PGT pregnancies were significantly decreased by 41% and 30%, respectively, although the risk of HDP was still significantly increased by 50% in PGT pregnancies compared with IVF/ICSI pregnancies. The combined results of obstetric and neonatal outcomes of PGT and IVF/ICSI singleton pregnancies were consistent with the overall results. Further subgroup analyses indicated that both PGD and PGS pregnancies were associated with a higher risk of PTD and a lower gestational age compared with SC pregnancies.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS

This meta-analysis showed that PGT pregnancies may be associated with increased risks of LBW, PTD and HDP compared with SC pregnancies. The overall obstetric and neonatal outcomes of PGT pregnancies are favourable compared with those of IVF/ICSI pregnancies, although PGT pregnancies were associated with a higher risk of HDP. However, because the number of studies that could be included was limited, more randomised controlled trials and prospective cohort studies are needed to confirm these conclusions.

Single blastocyst stage versus single cleavage stage embryo transfer following fresh transfer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To compare the available evidence of the effectiveness of single blastocyst stage transfer against the effectiveness of single cleavage stage embryo transfer.

STUDY DESIGN

A systematic research based on Pubmed, Embase and the Cochrane Library was performed until May 2, 2020 to identify all relevant studies. The Cochrane Collaboration's Review Manager (RevMan) 5.0.2 software was used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Five randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included in analysis, involving 1784 patients in total, who were divided into 2 groups, which were the single blastocyst stage transfer (SBT) group of 932, and the single cleavage stage transfer (SCT) group of 852. Our meta-analysis concluded that SBT group had a significantly higher clinical pregnancy rate (RR 1.26; 95%CI: 1.14-1.39), ongoing pregnancy rate (RR 1.19; 95%CI: 1.05-1.35) and delivery rate (RR 1.4; 95%CI: 1.13-1.75) than SCT group during the fresh transfer. While miscarriage rate (RR 0.93; 95% CI: 0.66-1.33), multiple pregnancy rate (RR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.51-2.45) and ectopic pregnancy rate (RR, 0.5; 95% CI: 0.13-1.90) between two groups showed no significant difference. However, the SCT group contained notably more cryopreserved embryos than the SBT group. (RR -0.68, 95% CI: -0.95 to -0.41).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that single blastocyst stage transfer is associated with higher ongoing pregnancy rate and delivery rate comparing to single cleavage stage transfer in the clinical practice. Due to the low quality of the evidence of the primary outcomes, other higher-quality lager RCTs are necessary before a fully informed decision is made.

The Risk of Congenital Anomalies by Fertility Treatment Modality

Importance

Up to 4% of all births in developed nations involve assisted reproductive technology (ART), along with other fertility treatment modalities. Thus, ART pregnancies constitute an important epidemiologic population with a known increased risk of congenital anomalies. In this review, we summarize current fertility treatment modalities and their associated risk of congenital anomalies.

Objective

To review the risk of birth defects among pregnancies conceived with ART and other fertility treatments.

Evidence Acquisition

Articles were obtained from PubMed and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and American Society of Reproductive Medicine committee opinions.

Results

In vitro fertilization has been associated with a 25% to 50% increased risk of birth defects, including abnormalities of these organ systems: cardiovascular (25%-40% of anomalies), genitourinary (10%-60%), gastrointestinal (10%-20%), and musculoskeletal (10%-35%). Although the data are mixed, intracytoplasmic sperm injection has also been found to be associated with an increased risk of defects, particularly hypospadias, when compared with conventional in vitro fertilization. The risk among fresh versus frozen cycles and cleavage stage versus blastocyst transfers remains uncertain. There appears to be no significant added risk with preimplantation genetic testing, although more studies are needed. Ovulation induction with oral agents appears safe and not associated with an increased risk of anomalies. Oocyte cryopreservation also appears safe, but the data are still limited, requiring future investigation.

Conclusions and Relevance

While the relative risk of birth defects among ART pregnancies is increased when compared with spontaneous conceptions, the absolute risk remains low. There are no standard screening recommendations for ART pregnancies. Per the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, patients who have undergone ART should be counseled regarding the risk of birth defects and available antenatal evaluation, including fetal echocardiogram and detailed ultrasound evaluation.

PGT-A: who and when? Α systematic review and network meta-analysis of RCTs

PURPOSE

Wide controversy is still ongoing regarding efficiency of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A). This systematic review and meta-analysis, aims to identify the patient age group that benefits from PGT-A and the best day to biopsy.

METHODS

A systematic search of the literature was performed on MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Central Library up to May 2020. Eleven randomized controlled trials employing PGT-A with comprehensive chromosomal screening (CCS) on Day-3 or Day-5 were eligible.

RESULTS

PGT-A did not improve live-birth rates (LBR) per patient in the general population (RR:1.11; 95%CI:0.87-1.42; n=1513; I2=75%). However, PGT-A lowered miscarriage rate in the general population (RR:0.45; 95%CI:0.25-0.80; n=912; I2=49%). Interestingly, the cumulative LBR per patient was improved by PGT-A (RR:1.36; 95%CI:1.13-1.64; n=580; I2=12%). When performing an age-subgroup analysis PGT-A improved LBR in women over the age of 35 (RR:1.29; 95%CI:1.05-1.60; n=692; I2=0%), whereas it appeared to be ineffective in younger women (RR:0.92; 95%CI:0.62-1.39; n=666; I2=75%). Regarding optimal timing, only day-5 biopsy practice presented with improved LBR per ET (RR: 1.37; 95% CI: 1.03-1.82; I2=72%).

CONCLUSION

PGT-A did not improve clinical outcomes for the general population, however PGT-A improved live-birth rates strictly when performed on blastocyst stage embryos of women over the 35-year-old mark.

The effects of aging on molecular modulators of human embryo implantation

Advancing age has a negative impact on female fertility. As implantation rates decline during the normal maternal life course, age-related, embryonic factors are altered and our inability to monitor these factors in an unbiased genome-wide manner in vivo has severely limited our understanding of early human embryo development and implantation. Our high-throughput methodology uses trophectoderm samples representing the full spectrum of maternal reproductive ages with embryo implantation potential examined in relation to trophectoderm transcriptome dynamics and reproductive maternal age. Potential embryo-endometrial interactions were tested using trophectoderm sampled from young women, with the receptive uterine environment representing the most 'fertile' environment for successful embryo implantation. Potential roles for extracellular exosomes, embryonic metabolism and regulation of apoptosis were revealed. These biomarkers are consistent with embryo-endometrial crosstalk/developmental competency, serving as a mediator for successful implantation. Our data opens the door to developing a diagnostic test for predicting implantation success in women undergoing fertility treatment.

Vitrification yields higher cryo-survival rate than slow freezing in biopsied bovine in vitro produced blastocysts

Vitrification and slow freezing are the two commonly used embryo cryopreservation methods. In most studies, vitrification of intact embryos has proven superior in several respects, including cell and embryo survival and pregnancy rate. However, there is a lack of data for comparing these two methods in in vitro produced (IVP) bovine blastocysts, which have been subjected to the retrieval of trophectoderm (TE) biopsy. Day 7 IVP blastocysts were pooled and randomized into four groups: 1) non-biopsy (NB), 2) biopsy (B), 3) biopsy-vitrification (BV), 4) biopsy-slow freeze (BSF). The blastocysts in the B, BV, and BSF groups were subjected to TE biopsy. For the B group, this was followed by 5 hours (h) incubation and subsequent scoring of the biopsy-survival (re-expansion) rate before processing for further analyses. For the BV and BSF groups, the biopsy procedure was followed by 2 h incubation, allowing for a quick re-expansion, after which the blastocysts were subjected to vitrification and slow freezing, respectively. After warming and thawing, respectively, they were then incubated for 5 h followed by scoring the cryo-survival (re-expansion) rates before processing for further analyses. These included quantification of ICM and TE cells, cleaved caspase-3- and TUNEL-positive cells, quantitative PCR on cellular stress markers (SOD1 and PRDX1), and ultrastructural analysis. The biopsy-survival rate in the B group was 94% (307/326). The cryo-survival rate in BV (86%, 138/161) was higher than that in BSF (57%, 81/142; P < 0.001). No differences were noted between the average ICM, TE, and total cell numbers of the groups. The percentages of cleaved caspase-3-positive cells were higher in BV vs. NB (P < 0.05), in BSF vs. NB (P < 0.001), and in BSF vs. B (P < 0.001). The percentages of TUNEL-positive cells were higher in BV vs. NB (P < 0.05) and in BSF vs. NB (P < 0.001). The levels of mRNA abundance for SOD1 and PRDX1 in B, BV, and BSF were not different from that in NB. The ultrastructural analysis of blastocysts in the BV and BSF groups showed distension of extracellular spaces and appearance of intracellular vacuoles in the ICM, distension of mitochondria, and disorganization of mitochondrial cristae in both ICM and TE, and weakened tight junctions between adjacent TE cells. In summary, our findings demonstrate that vitrification yields a higher cryo-survival rate than slow freezing in biopsied bovine IVP blastocysts. However, biopsy-vitrification and biopsy-slow-freeze values are comparable in terms of ICM, TE, and total blastocyst cell numbers, as well as cleaved caspase-3- and TUNEL-positive cell rates. Moreover, biopsy and cryopreservation performed alone had no effect on ICM, TE, total blastocyst cell numbers, or TUNEL-positive cell rates. Biopsy and vitrification performed alone had no effect on the cleaved caspase-3 positive cell rates, whereas slow freezing resulted in an increased rate. Furthermore, double traumatization with a combination of biopsy and cryopreservation, either vitrification or slow freezing, resulted in increased rates of cleaved caspase-3- and TUNEL-positive cells.

Pre-implantation genetic testing: Past, present, future

BACKGROUND

Pre-implantation genetic testing (PGT) has been performed worldwide since it was first used by Handyside et al in the United Kingdom to sex embryos in 1990. Until about 2010, cleavage stage embryo biopsy and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) were mainstream; however, in 2012, blastocyst biopsy (trophectoderm; TE biopsy) became mainstream. In addition, array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) was used for analysis and further evolved to next-generation sequencing (NGS), which is used worldwide.

METHODS

PGT for reciprocal balanced translocation and Robertsonian translocation (PGT-SR) was approved in Japan for habitual abortion to reduce pregnancy loss, and since 2008, we have been performing PGT-SR using cleavage stage embryos and FISH. In 2014, we performed TE biopsy and NGS analysis.

MAIN FINDINGS

In this paper, I separately described the details of our methods and clinical results of FISH and NGS. NGS is superior to FISH because it can detect all chromosomes.

CONCLUSION

TE biopsy and NGS, which have recently become mainstream, have stable outcomes, because TE biopsy yields more cells and fewer mosaics than the cleavage stage. As a result, diagnoses are more reliable, resulting in higher pregnancy rates and lower abortion rates.

Review: Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) as a reproductive option in patients with neurodegenerative disorders

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) was introduced in the late 1980s and represents an option for couples at risk of transmitting an inherited, debilitating or neurological disorder to their children. From a cleavage or blastocyst stage embryo, cell(s) are collected and then genetically analyzed for disease; enabling an unaffected embryo to be transferred into the uterus cavity. Nowadays, PGD has been carried out for several hundreds of heritable conditions including myotonic dystrophy, and for susceptibility genes involved in cancers of the nervous system. Currently, advanced molecular technologies with better resolution, such as array comparative genomic hybridisation, quantitative polymerase chain reaction, and next generation sequencing, are on the verge of becoming the gold standard in embryo preimplantation screening. Given this, it may be time for neurological societies to consider the published evidence to develop new guidelines for the integration of PGD into modern preventative neurology. Therefore, the main aim of this review is to illustrate the option of PGD to enable conception of an unaffected baby, and to assist clinicians and neurologists in the counseling of the patient at risk of transmitting an inherited disease, to explore the genetic journey throughout in vitro fertilization IVF with PGD.

The dawn of the future: 30 years from the first biopsy of a human embryo. The detailed history of an ongoing revolution

Following early studies showing no adverse effects, cleavage stage biopsy by zona drilling using acid Tyrode's solution, and removal of single blastomeres for preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) and identification of sex in couples at risk of X-linked disease, was performed by Handyside and colleagues in late 1989, and pregnancies reported in 1990. This method was later used for specific diagnosis of monogenic conditions, and a few years later also for chromosomal structural and/or numerical impairments, thereby establishing a valuable alternative option to prenatal diagnosis. This revolutionary approach in clinical embryology spread worldwide, and several other embryo biopsy strategies developed over three decades in a process that is still ongoing. The rationale of this narrative review is to outline the different biopsy approaches implemented across the years in the workflow of the IVF clinics that provided PGT: their establishment, the first clinical experiences, their downsides, evolution, improvement and standardization. The history ends with a glimpse of the future: minimally/non-invasive PGT and experimental embryo micromanipulation protocols. This grand theme review outlines a timeline of the evolution of embryo biopsy protocols, whose implementation is increasing worldwide together with the increasing application of PGT techniques in IVF. It represents a vade mecum especially for the past, present and upcoming operators and experts in this field to (re)live this history from its dawn to its most likely future.

[Pre-implantation genetic testing: Comparison between cleavage stage and blastocyst biopsy]

OBJECTIVES

Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) refers to the set of techniques for testing whether embryos obtained through in vitro fertilization have genetic defect. There is a lack of global standardization regarding practices between countries or even from one center to another. In ours, biopsies are preferably performed on day 3 embryos, but also at the blastocyst stage on day 5. The blastocyst biopsy often requires systematic freezing of the embryos before obtaining the genetic results, whereas day 3 biopsy allows fresh embryo transfer of the healthy or balanced embryo after getting the genetic results. We wanted to compare the chances of success for couples performing PGT in our center according to the day of the biopsy.

METHODS

For this, we carried out a retrospective monocentric study including all PGT cycles performed between 2016 and 2019 divided into two groups: day 3 or day 5 biopsy.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in terms of live birth rate (P=0.7375) after fresh embryo transfers, as well for pregnancy rates, clinical pregnancy rates, implantation rates and miscarriage rates. On the other hand, we observed higher live birth rates after frozen-thawed embryo transfer when the biopsy was performed on day 5 rather on day 3 (P=0.0001). We also wanted to assess what was the most efficient biopsy strategy in our laboratory. Our rates of useful embryos were similar regardless of the day of the biopsy (34% in D3 and 37.7% in D5, P=0.244). No statistical difference was found in the number of unnecessarily biopsied embryos in the two groups. But still, the percentage of embryos biopsied on D5 and immediately frozen was 42.8% (118 blastocysts), while no embryo biopsied on D3 led to this case.

CONCLUSION

Therefore, our results are in favor of generalization of the D5 biopsy as the international standard. However, the organizational, financial and logistical implications that this technic would impose make it unsystematic in our center.

Non-invasive preimplantation genetic testing (niPGT): the next revolution in reproductive genetics?

BACKGROUND

Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) encompasses methods that allow embryos to be tested for severe inherited conditions or for chromosome abnormalities, relevant to embryo health and viability. In order to obtain embryonic genetic material for analysis, a biopsy is required, involving the removal of one or more cells. This invasive procedure greatly increases the costs of PGT and there have been concerns that embryo viability could be compromised in some cases. The recent discovery of DNA within the blastocoele fluid (BF) of blastocysts and in spent embryo culture media (SCM) has led to interest in the development of non-invasive methods of PGT (niPGT).

OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE

This review evaluates the current scientific evidence regarding non-invasive genetic assessment of preimplantation embryos. The success of different PGT methodologies in collecting and analysing extra-embryonic DNA is evaluated, and consideration is given to the potential biological and technical hindrances to obtaining a reliable clinical diagnosis.

SEARCH METHODS

Original research and review papers concerning niPGT were sourced by searching PubMed and Google Scholar databases until July 2019. Searches comprised the keywords: 'non-invasive'; 'cell-free DNA'; 'blastocentesis'; 'blastocoel fluid'; 'spent culture media'; 'embryo culture medium'; 'preimplantation genetic testing'; 'preimplantation genetic diagnosis'; 'preimplantation genetic screening'; and 'aneuploidy'.

OUTCOMES

Embryonic DNA is frequently detectable in BF and SCM of embryos produced during IVF treatment. Initial studies have achieved some success when performing cytogenetic and molecular genetic analysis. However, in many cases, the efficiency has been restricted by technical complications associated with the low quantity and quality of the DNA. Reported levels of ploidy agreement between SCM/BF samples and biopsied embryonic cells vary widely. In some cases, a discrepancy with respect to cytogenetic data obtained after trophectoderm biopsy may be attributable to embryonic mosaicism or DNA contamination (usually of maternal origin). Some research indicates that aneuploid cells are preferentially eliminated from the embryo, suggesting that their DNA might be over-represented in SCM and BF samples; this hypothesis requires further investigation.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS

Available data suggest that BF and SCM samples frequently provide DNA templates suitable for genetic analyses, offering a potential means of PGT that is less expensive than traditional methods, requires less micromanipulation skill and poses a lower risk to embryos. Critically, DNA isolation and amplification protocols must be optimised to reproducibly obtain an accurate clinical diagnosis, whilst minimising the impact of confounding factors such as contamination. Further investigations are required to understand the mechanisms underlying the release of embryonic DNA and to determine the extent to which this material reflects the true genetic status of the corresponding embryo. Currently, the clinic al potential of niPGT remains unknown.

Prenatal testing in pregnancies conceived by in vitro fertilization with pre-implantation genetic testing

OBJECTIVE

Women with pregnancies resulting from in vitro fertilization (IVF) with normal pre-implantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) are advised to undergo prenatal screening and testing during pregnancy. It is not well known how many follow these recommendations. Our objective was to study prenatal testing decisions made by women with pregnancies conceived through IVF with PGT-A.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of women who received genetic counseling during pregnancies conceived through IVF with normal PGT-A. We excluded those who received genetic counseling preconceptionally prior to IVF. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics and after testing for normality by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, independent t test, Mann-Whitney U test, or Chi-square/Fisher's exact test.

RESULTS

Data from 83 women were included. Of these, 53 (63.9%) had at least one of the following prenatal tests: first trimester combined screening (16.9%), non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS) (45.8%), second trimester serum screening (6%), and invasive diagnostic testing (6%). 10.8% had more than one of the above tests and 36.1% declined all tests.

CONCLUSION

Almost two-thirds of women who were pregnant after IVF with normal PGT-A had prenatal aneuploidy screening or testing. Future prospective studies with larger cohorts are needed to further ascertain decision making in this population.

Clinical utility of combined preimplantation genetic testing methods in couples at risk of passing on beta thalassemia/hemoglobin E disease: A retrospective review from a single center

Thalassemia and hemoglobinopathy is a group of hereditary blood disorder with diverse clinical manifestation inherited by autosomal recessive manner. The Beta thalassemia/Hemoglobin E disease (HbE/βthal) causes a variable degree of hemolysis and the most severe form of HbE/βthal disease develop a lifelong transfusion-dependent anemia. Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) is an established procedure of embryo genetic analysis to avoid the risk of passing on this particular condition from the carrier parents to their offspring. Preimplantation genetic testing for chromosomal aneuploidy (PGT-A) also facilitates the selection of embryos without chromosomal aberration resulting in the successful embryo implantation rate. Herein, we study the clinical outcome of using combined PGT-M and PGT-A in couples at risk of passing on HbE/βthal disease. The study was performed from January 2016 to December 2017. PGT-M was developed using short tandem repeat linkage analysis around the beta globin gene cluster and direct mutation testing using primer extension-based mini-sequencing. Thereafter, we recruited 15 couples at risk of passing on HbE/βthal disease who underwent a combined total of 22 IVF cycles. PGT was performed in 106 embryos with a 3.89% allele drop-out rate. Using combined PGT-M and PGT-A methods, 80% of women obtained satisfactory genetic testing results and were able to undergo embryo transfer within the first two cycles. The successful implantation rate was 64.29%. PGT accuracy was evaluated by prenatal and postnatal genetic confirmation and 100% had a genetic status consistent with PGT results. The overall clinical outcome of successful live birth for couples at risk of producing offspring with HbE/βthal was 53.33%. Conclusively, combined PGT-M and PGT-A is a useful technology to prevent HbE/βthal disease in the offspring of recessive carriers.

Fertility and Pregnancy in Women with Transfusion-Dependent Thalassemia

As more women with transfusion-dependent thalassemia are seeking pregnancy, ensuring the best outcomes for both the mother and baby requires concerted, collaborative efforts between practitioners and the family. Proactive counseling, early fertility evaluation, recent developments in reproductive technology, and optimal management of iron overload, have resulted in more successful pregnancies and the birth of healthy newborns. With advances in technology for prenatal screening and increased awareness to perform screening for hemoglobinopathies, healthy pregnancy outcomes have become the expectation. Topics that require further study include management that allows fertility preservation, improved non-invasive prenatal diagnosis methods for affected fetuses, the use of chelation therapy during pregnancy, and indications for and duration of anticoagulation.

Chromosomal analysis in IVF: just how useful is it?

Designed to minimize chances of genetically abnormal embryos, preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) involves in vitro fertilization (IVF), embryo biopsy, diagnosis and selective embryo transfer. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) aims to avoid miscarriage and live born trisomic offspring and to improve IVF success. Diagnostic approaches include fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and more contemporary comprehensive chromosome screening (CCS) including array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH), quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR), next-generation sequencing (NGS) and karyomapping. NGS has an improved dynamic range, and karyomapping can detect chromosomal and monogenic disorders simultaneously. Mosaicism (commonplace in human embryos) can arise by several mechanisms; those arising initially meiotically (but with a subsequent post-zygotic 'trisomy rescue' event) usually lead to adverse outcomes, whereas the extent to which mosaics that are initially chromosomally normal (but then arise purely post-zygotically) can lead to unaffected live births is uncertain. Polar body (PB) biopsy is the least common sampling method, having drawbacks including cost and inability to detect any paternal contribution. Historically, cleavage-stage (blastomere) biopsy has been the most popular; however, higher abnormality levels, mosaicism and potential for embryo damage have led to it being superseded by blastocyst (trophectoderm - TE) biopsy, which provides more cells for analysis. Improved biopsy, diagnosis and freeze-all strategies collectively have the potential to revolutionize PGT-A, and there is increasing evidence of their combined efficacy. Nonetheless, PGT-A continues to attract criticism, prompting questions of when we consider the evidence base sufficient to justify routine PGT-A? Basic biological research is essential to address unanswered questions concerning the chromosome complement of human embryos, and we thus entreat companies, governments and charities to fund more. This will benefit both IVF patients and prospective parents at risk of aneuploid offspring following natural conception. The aim of this review is to appraise the 'state of the art' in terms of PGT-A, including the controversial areas, and to suggest a practical 'way forward' in terms of future diagnosis and applied research.

Clinical reassessment of human embryo ploidy status between cleavage and blastocyst stage by Next Generation Sequencing

One of the most important limitations of genetic testing in preimplantation embryos is embryonic mosaicism, especially when performed on D3 with only a single blastomere evaluated. Previous publications, using Array-Comparative Genomic Hybridization (a-CGH) to compare day 3 (D3) biopsies versus trophectoderm biopsies for the analysis of aneuploid embryos, showed similar high concordance rates per embryo diagnosis for D3 biopsies and trophectoderm biopsies. Next generation sequencing (NGS) was introduced lately as a new technique for preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A). Using this technique, this retrospective descriptive study evaluated the degree of the concordance of the diagnosis between preimplantation human cleavage stage (D3) and blastocyst stage (D5) embryos. Double biopsies on D3 and D5 were performed on 118 embryos, reaching blastocyst stage on D5 and had not been selected for transfer. As the fertilization law of the United Arab Emirates does not allow embryo freezing, also surplus euploid embryos after D 3 biopsy were included. Analysis of the NGS results from D3 and D5 embryo biopsies showed a total concordance rate per embryo diagnosis of 85.6% for euploid and aneuploid embryos. The concordance rates per embryo chromosomal pattern for embryo diagnosed as aneuploid at both biopsy stages was 82.2%. However, the status regarding the affected chromosomes was not identical on D3 and D5. Hence, the total concordance rate between D3 biopsy and D5 biopsy was limited to 67.8%. This current study clearly demonstrated that the concordance rates between D3 and D5 biopsies in aneuploid and euploid embryos are lower than previously reported.

Do patients who achieve pregnancy using IVF-PGS do the recommended genetic diagnostic testing in pregnancy?

PURPOSE

Patients undergoing in-vitro fertilization (IVF) with preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) are counseled about the limitations of this technique. As part of the consent process for PGS, physicians recommend diagnostic genetic testing performed in early pregnancy to definitively rule out chromosomal abnormalities. We have noted anecdotally, however, that few patients undergo the recommended diagnostic testing. In this study, we are examining if women who conceived using IVF-PGS did early pregnancy chromosomal testing, and if they did, what type of testing they had.

METHODS

This study was performed from 2015 to 2017 in the Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility at Northwestern University. We included patients who became pregnant after IVF-PGS who were seen by the Division of Reproductive Genetics and non-PGS control group.

RESULTS

Sixty-eight patients were included. A total of 50 patients (73.5%) opted for non-invasive prenatal screening; 5 (7.4%) had invasive testing (4 had chorionic villus sampling and 1 had amniocentesis). A total of 13 patients (19%) declined further genetic testing. When comparing demographic data, the mean age was significantly higher in the group of patients who pursued non-invasive testing than in the group who declined further testing (37.15 vs 34.05 years old, p < 0.05). Control group declined invasive diagnostic testing.

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients who conceive using IVF-PGS do not pursue diagnostic prenatal chromosomal testing. Future studies focusing on decision making in this patient group are warranted to further elucidate why a small percentage of patients opt for diagnostic testing, even when adequately counseled about the inherent limitations of PGS.

Preimplantation Genetic Screening with Spent Culture Medium/Blastocoel Fluid for in Vitro Fertilization

Preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) detects chromosomal aneuploidy from DNA extracted from trophectodermal biopsy of the embryos before implantation. Although a controlled study showed no difference in pregnancy rates between this invasive cell biopsy technique and a non-biopsied control group, the potential long-term damage by the current PGS method has not be completely ruled out. We therefore tested a less-invasive protocol which utilizes spent culture medium combining with blastocoel fluid (ECB) to assess chromosomal aneuploidy. We compared the new protocol with the currently employed trophectodermal biopsy method against chromosomal information obtained from the remaining embryo. We found that the new technique generated information about aneuploidy that was not entirely identical to obtained from the biopsied trophectoderm or the remaining embryo. As the origins of the DNA extracted from the three sample types were not the same, the significance and interpretation of each result would have its own meaning. The possible implications derived from the ECB results as well as those from cell biopsy were discussed. The effectiveness of this new approach in selecting the best embryo for uterine implantation awaits further long term evaluation.

Embryo pooling: a promising strategy for managing insufficient number of embryos in preimplantation genetic diagnosis

This retrospective study evaluated the embryo pooling strategy for managing insufficient number of embryos in preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) through serial vitrification of cleavage-stage embryos from consecutive cycles, and simultaneous blastocysts biopsy in combination with blastocysts obtained in ultimate fresh cycle. A retrospective analysis of the cumulative pregnancy rate of 68 patients underwent cleavage-stage embryos accumulation (Embryo Pooling Group) and 94 patients underwent one stimulation cycle (Control Group) over a 2-year period were conducted. The blastocyst formation rate was comparable between the consecutive cycles and the ultimate cycle in embryo pooling group (56.0 versus 62.0%, p = .078). No significant difference existed between twice-vitrified and once-vitrified warmed blastocysts with respect to implantation rate (50.8 versus 46.3%, p = .658). The implantation rate and cumulative pregnancy rate of embryo pooling group were 49.0 and 67.6%, respectively, which were statistically comparable to the corresponding values of 48.9 and 73.4% obtained in control group. Our study suggests that in patients undergoing ICSI-PGD who do not reach enough embryos in a single stimulation cycle, pooling embryos from consecutive ovarian stimulation cycles is a promising strategy, which can render a cumulative pregnancy rate comparable to those patients who only require one stimulation cycle.

Preimplantation genetic screening: results of a worldwide web-based survey

Our objective was to evaluate and characterize the extent and patterns of worldwide usage of preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) among the assisted reproductive technique community. A prospective, web-based questionnaire with questions relating to practices of, and views on, PGS was directed to users and non-users of PGS. A total of 386 IVF units from 70 countries conducting 342,600 IVF cycles annually responded to the survey. A total of 77% of respondents routinely carry out PGS in their clinics for a variety of indications: advanced maternal age (27%), recurrent implantation failure (32%) and recurrent pregnancy loss (31%). Few (6%) offer PGS to all their patients. In most cycles (72%), trophectoderm biopsy is carried out and either array-comparative genomic hybridization (59%) or next-generation sequencing (16%) are used for genetic analysis. Only 30% of respondents regard PGS as clearly evidenced-based, and most (84%) believe that more randomized controlled trials are needed to support the use of PGS. Despite ongoing debate and lack of robust evidence, most respondents support the use of PGS, and believe that it may aid in transferring only euploid embryos, thereby reducing miscarriage rates and multiple pregnancies, increasing live birth rates and reducing the risk of aneuploid pregnancies and births.

Karyomapping: a single centre's experience from application of methodology to ongoing pregnancy and live-birth rates

This study aimed to determine whether karyomapping can be applied to couples requiring preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) for single gene disorder (SGD) and/or chromosomal rearrangement. 75/82 (91.5%) and 6/82 (7.3%) couples were referred for autosomal SGD and X-linked disease, respectively. One couple (1.2%) was referred for SGD and chromosomal rearrangement. Of 608 embryos, 146 (24%, 95% CI 21-28) day-3 and 462 (76%, 95% CI 72-79) blastocyst biopsies were performed. A total of 81 embryo transfers were performed; 16/81 (20%) were following day-3 embryo biopsy, 65/81 (80%) were following blastocyst biopsy and cryopreserved embryo transfer. Of 81 embryo transfers with known pregnancy outcome, 51 (63%, 95% CI 52-73) were on-going pregnancies, 6/81 (7%, 95% CI 3-15) resulted in first trimester miscarriages and 24/81 (30%, 95% CI 21-40) were failed implantations. Of the 51 on-going pregnancies, 15 (29%, 95% CI 19-43) couples had a singleton live birth at the time of write up. There have been no reports of abnormal prenatal, genetic testing or diagnosis of phenotype at birth. Karyomapping is reliable, efficient and accurate for couples requiring PGD for SGD and/or chromosomal rearrangement. Additionally, it provides aneuploidy screening, minimising risks of miscarriage and implantation failure.

Reproductive outcome following pre-implantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) in the UK

In 2013, the National Health Service Commissioning board centralized the funding in England for up to three cycles of pre-implantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) for couples who have, or are carriers of, a specific genetic disorder. This study presents the historical data of PGD cycles and their clinical outcomes in UK as extrapolated from the national data registry. Retrospective analysis of outcome of cycles undergoing pre-implantation genetic diagnosis in the UK over the past 20 years was performed from the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority database (n = 2974). Binary logistic regression was used to determine trends over time and adjusted for maternal age. Briefly, the number of PGD cycles has risen 127-fold from 1991 to 2012 with 3.6-fold increase (360% rise) from 2004 to 2012. A total of one in four embryos following pre-implantation genetic diagnosis did not reach embryo transfer and 92% of these were due to a failure to survive. The live birth rate has risen over 20 years and there has been a steady decline in reported incidence of congenital abnormalities (p < 0.07). PGD has thus emerged as a safe and effective alternative to prenatal diagnosis but with ever evolving technological advances, a robust system of data collection that incorporates techniques used and reporting of mutation-specific clinical outcomes is suggested.

Chromosomal mosaicism detected during preimplantation genetic screening: results of a worldwide Web-based survey

Embryonic mosaicism, the presence of more than one distinct cell line within an embryo, has recently become the focus of growing attention and controversy in the context of preimplantation genetic screening (PGS). To evaluate the extent of mosaic aneuploidy in clinical practice and to gain insight on the practices and views regarding this issue, we conducted a survey using a prospective, 20-item Web-based questionnaire with questions related to practices and views regarding mosaicism in PGS. A total of 102 in vitro fertilization (IVF) units from 32 countries that performed 108,900 IVF cycles annually responded to the survey. More than half responded that embryonic mosaic aneuploidy is reported by the laboratory, but 31.9% stated that samples are reported as euploid or aneuploid only. If mosaic aneuploidy is reported, 46% stated that it was present in ≤10% of the embryos. More than two-thirds were of the opinion that next-generation sequencing is required to reliably detect mosaicism. Among centers performing PGS, 47.9% consider embryonic mosaicism when detected in >20% of the cells, and nearly two-thirds believe that mosaic aneuploid embryos should be stored for potential therapeutic use after extensive and appropriate counseling. In summary, mosaicism has always existed in preimplantation embryos, and new technologies can now detect its presence with higher resolution. More studies are needed before definite conclusions can be drawn.

Blastomere biopsy for PGD delays embryo compaction and blastulation: a time-lapse microscopic analysis

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study was to explore the effect of blastomere biopsy for preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) on the embryos' dynamics, further cleavage, development, and implantation.

METHODS

The study group included 366 embryos from all PGD treatments (September 2012 to June 2014) cultured in the EmbryoScope™ time-lapse monitoring system. The control group included all intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) embryos cultured in EmbryoScope™ until day 5 during the same time period (385 embryos). Time points of key embryonic events were analyzed with an EmbryoViewer™.

RESULTS

Most (88 %) of the embryos were biopsied at ≥8 cells. These results summarize the further dynamic development of the largest cohort of biopsied embryos and demonstrate that blastomere biopsy of cleavage-stage embryos significantly delayed compaction and blastulation compared to the control non-biopsied embryos. This delay in preimplanation developmental events also affected postimplantation development as observed when the dynamics of non-implanted embryos (known implantation data (KID) negative) were compared to those of implanted embryos (KID positive).

CONCLUSION

Analysis of morphokinetic parameters enabled us to explore how blastomere biopsy interferes with the dynamic sequence of developmental events. Our results show that biopsy delays the compaction and the blastulation of the embryos, leading to a decrease in implantation.

Pregnancy in women with thalassemia: challenges and solutions

Advances in treatment of thalassemia have led to the aging of thalassemic patients, and consequently concern about successful reproductive outcome is augmented. Although women with thalassemia intermedia only were considered competent of achieving pregnancy, case series reveal the willingness of both thalassemia major and thalassemia intermedia women to have a family. Pregnancy in general is characterized by dynamic multiple-system changes and increased susceptibility to oxidative stress, while homozygous, transfusion-dependent, β-thalassemia patients manifest cardiac, hepatic, endocrine, and metabolic disorders attributable to chronic anoxia and iron overload and thalassemia intermedia, usually nontransfused, is associated with augmented risk of thromboembolic events. Pregnancy in thalassemia should be considered a high risk for both mother and fetus, and favorable outcomes are the result of continuous preconception, antenatal, and postpartum assessment and management by a team of thalassemia experts.

The clinical application of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for the patient affected by congenital contractural arachnodactyly and spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy

PURPOSE

To investigate the usefulness of preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) for the patient affected by congenital contractural arachnodactyly (CCA) and spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy (SBMA).

METHODS

Multiple displacement amplification (MDA) was performed for whole genome amplification (WGA) of biopsied trophectoderm (TE) cells. Direct mutation detection by sequencing and next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) haplotyping were used for CCA diagnosis. Direct sequencing of the PCR products and sex determination by amplification of sex-determining region Y (SRY) gene were used for SBMA diagnosis. After PGD, the unaffected blastocyst (B4) was transferred in the following frozen embryo transfer (FET).

RESULTS

In this PGD cycle, sixteen MII oocytes were inseminated by ICSI with testicular spermatozoa. Four blastocysts (B4, B5, B10, B13) were utilized for TE cell biopsy on day 5 after ICSI. After PGD, B4 was unaffected by CCA and SBMA. B5 was affected by CCA and carried SBMA. B10 was unaffected by CCA and carried SBMA. B13 was affected by CCA and unaffected by SBMA. B4 was the only unaffected blastocyst and transferred into the uterus for the subsequent FET cycle. The accuracy of PGD was confirmed by amniocentesis at 21 weeks of gestation. A healthy boy weighing 2850 g was born by cesarean section at the 38th week of gestation.

CONCLUSIONS

PGD is a valid screening tool for patienst affected of CCA and SBMA to prevent transmission of these genetic diseases from parents to children.