Venous thromboembolism associated with medically assisted reproduction (MAR): British fertility society policy and practice guidance for assessment and prevention

The association between Medically Assisted Reproduction (MAR) and thromboembolic complications has been reported widely in multiple published studies. Although venous thromboembolism (VTE) is not thought to be a common complication of MAR, it is associated with high morbidity and is often preventable. Since VTE usually occurs after completion of MAR treatment and is often managed outside of the treating fertility unit, these complications are likely to be underreported and there may be limited awareness of the risks among clinicians. As we continue to see a rise in the total number of MAR treatment cycles, particularly in women over 40 years of age, along with a steady increase in the number of fertility preservation cycles for both medical and social indications, it is likely that we will see an increase in absolute numbers of VTE complications. Currently, there is a lack of management guidance and reporting of VTE events associated with assisted conception treatment. The aim of this guidance is to provide clinicians with information on VTE risk factors, guidance on assessing VTE risk and the best practice recommendations on risk reducing strategies for individuals at risk of VTE undergoing ovarian stimulation and embryo transfer cycles.

From oocytes to a live birth: Are we improving the biological efficiency?

OBJECTIVE(S)

The objectives of our study were to investigate the live birth rate (LBR) per oocyte retrieved during in vitro fertilization, in patients who had used all their embryos and to extrapolate the LBR in patients with remaining frozen embryos by calculating the expected LBR from these embryos.

DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

A single academically affiliated fertility clinic.

PATIENT(S)

Autologous in vitro fertilization cycles from January 2014 to December 2020. Data on the number of oocytes retrieved, number of embryos obtained and transferred (at cleavage or blastocyst-stage), use of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A), and number of live births were obtained. The expected LBR was estimated in patients with remaining frozen embryos according to nationally reported Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology LBR data.

INTERVENTION(S)

None.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Live birth rate per oocyte retrieved.

RESULT(S)

A total of 12,717 patients met the inclusion criteria and underwent a total of 20,677 oocyte retrievals which yielded a total of 248,004 oocytes and 57,268 embryos (fresh and frozen). In patients who had fully utilized all their embryos the LBR per oocyte was 2.82% (ranging from 11.3% aged <35 years to 1.2% aged >42 years). Stratification of the population based on PGT-A utilization yielded similar results (with PGT-A: 2.88% and without PGT-A: 2.79%). When stratified by the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology age groups, the addition of PGT-A in patients aged 35-37 and 38-40 years yielded higher LBR per oocyte compared with patients who did not add PGT-A (P<.05). In patients with remaining frozen embryos who had added PGT-A, the projected LBR per oocyte was 8.34%. Use of PGT-A in patients aged <35 and 35-37 years decreased LBR per oocyte (P<.001 and P=.03, respectively) but improved LBR per oocyte in patients aged 38-40 and 41-42 years (P=.006 and P=.005, respectively). Poisson regression analysis demonstrated an age threshold of 38.5, below which PGT-A lowers LBR per oocyte compared with no PGT-A.

CONCLUSION(S)

Despite clinical and scientific advances in Assisted Reproductive Technology, with the current protocols of ovarian stimulation, the LBR per oocyte remains low reflecting a biological barrier that has yet to be overcome. Overall, the addition of PGT-A did not demonstrate improved outcomes.

Predicting the number of oocytes retrieved from controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with machine learning

STUDY QUESTION

Can machine learning predict the number of oocytes retrieved from controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH)?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Three machine-learning models were successfully trained to predict the number of oocytes retrieved from COH.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

A number of previous studies have identified and built predictive models on factors that influence the number of oocytes retrieved during COH. Many of these studies are, however, limited in the fact that they only consider a small number of variables in isolation.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

This study was a retrospective analysis of a dataset of 11,286 cycles performed at a single centre in France between 2009 and 2020 with the aim of building a predictive model for the number of oocytes retrieved from ovarian stimulation. The analysis was carried out by a data analysis team external to the centre using the Substra framework. The Substra framework enabled the data analysis team to send computer code to run securely on the centre's on-premises server. In this way, a high level of data security was achieved as the data analysis team did not have direct access to the data, nor did the data leave the centre at any point during the study.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

The Light Gradient Boosting Machine algorithm was used to produce three predictive models: one that directly predicted the number of oocytes retrieved and two that predicted which of a set of bins provided by two clinicians the number of oocytes retrieved fell into. The resulting models were evaluated on a held-out test set and compared to linear and logistic regression baselines. In addition, the models themselves were analysed to identify the parameters that had the biggest impact on their predictions.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

On average, the model that directly predicted the number of oocytes retrieved deviated from the ground truth by 4.21 oocytes. The model that predicted the first clinician's bins deviated by 0.73 bins whereas the model for the second clinician deviated by 0.62 bins. For all models, performance was best within the first and third quartiles of the target variable, with the model underpredicting extreme values of the target variable (no oocytes and large numbers of oocytes retrieved). Nevertheless, the erroneous predictions made for these extreme cases were still within the vicinity of the true value. Overall, all three models agreed on the importance of each feature which was estimated using Shapley Additive Explanation (SHAP) values. The feature with the highest mean absolute SHAP value (and thus the highest importance) was the antral follicle count, followed by basal AMH and FSH. Of the other hormonal features, basal TSH, LH, and testosterone levels were similarly important and baseline LH was the least important. The treatment characteristic with the highest SHAP value was the initial dose of gonadotropins.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

The models produced in this study were trained on a cohort from a single centre. They should thus not be used in clinical practice until trained and evaluated on a larger cohort more representative of the general population.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF FINDINGS

These predictive models for the number of oocytes retrieved from COH may be useful in clinical practice, assisting clinicians in optimizing COH protocols for individual patients. Our work also demonstrates the promise of using the Substra framework for allowing external researchers to provide clinically relevant insights on sensitive fertility data in a fully secure, trustworthy manner and opens a number of exciting avenues for accelerating future research.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

This study was funded by the French Public Bank of Investment as part of the Healthchain Consortium. T.Fe., C.He., J.C., C.J., C.-A.P., and C.Hi. are employed by Apricity. C.Hi. has received consulting fees and honoraria from Vitrolife, Merck Serono, Ferring, Cooper Surgical, Dibimed, Apricity, and Fairtility and travel support from Fairtility and Vitrolife, participates on an advisory board for Merck Serono, was the founder and organizer of the AI Fertility conference, has stock in Aria Fertility, TMRW, Fairtility, Apricity, and IVF Professionals, and received free equipment from Planar in exchange for first user feedback. C.J. has received a grant from BPI. J.C. has also received a grant from BPI, is a member of the Merck AI advisory board, and is a board member of Labelia Labs. C.He has a contract for medical writing of this manuscript by CHU Nantes and has received travel support from Apricity. A.R. haș received honoraria from Ferring and Organon. T.Fe. has received a grant from BPI.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

N/A.

Why ovarian stimulation should be aimed to maximize oocyte yield

The ultimate measure of success of assisted reproductive technology (ART) is the cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) per ovarian stimulation cycle, which increases with every oocyte collected. However, the adverse effects of ovarian stimulation on endometrial receptivity, as well as the risks of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) and adverse obstetric and neonatal outcomes, are observed to increase with ovarian response to stimulation. To mitigate these risks, mild stimulation has been hailed as the safer patient-friendly approach with the additional benefit of cutting the cost of gonadotrophins. Yet accumulating data demonstrate the absence of an adverse effect of ovarian stimulation on oocytes as well as on obstetric and neonatal outcomes, and multiple preventive strategies have been introduced for OHSS. The widespread use of vitrification revolutionized ART by enabling the liberal use of cycle segmentation to minimize the risk of OHSS and avoid impaired endometrial receptivity due to ovarian stimulation. Vitrification also allowed every oocyte to contribute to the CLBR. Thus, it is questionable whether the cost savings from gonadotrophins during the index ovarian stimulation offset the cost saving by preventing repeat ovarian stimulation and repeat laboratory procedures per live birth. This paper aims to prove by contradiction that ovarian stimulation should be aimed to maximize oocyte yield.

Ovarian Stimulation in Assisted Reproductive Technology Cycles for Varied Patient Profiles: An Indian Perspective

Controlled ovarian stimulation has been an integral part of in vitro fertilisation (IVF) treatment cycles. Availability of different gonadotropins for ovarian stimulation and gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) analogues for prevention of premature rise of leutinising hormone during follicular phase offer an opportunity to utilise them for a successful outcome in women with different subsets of ovarian response. Further, use of GnRH agonist as an alternative for human chorionic gonadotropin improves safety of ovarian stimulation in hyper-responders. Mild ovarian stimulation protocols have emerged as an alternative to conventional protocols in the recent years. Individualisation plays an important role in improving safety of IVF in hyper-responders while efforts continue to improve efficacy in poor responders. Some of the follicular and peri-ovulatory phase interventions may be associated with negative impact on the luteal phase and segmentalisation of the treatment with frozen embryo transfer may be an effective strategy in such a clinical scenario. This narrative review looks at the available evidence on various aspects of ovarian stimulation strategies and their consequences. In addition, it provides a concise summary of the evidence that has emerged from India on various aspects of ovarian stimulation.

Optimal individualization of patient-oriented ovarian stimulation in Japanese assisted reproductive technology clinics, a review for unique setting with advanced-age patients

Ovarian stimulation is a key issue in assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatment. ART practice in Japan is unique with various types of ovarian stimulation protocols, which may contribute to lower pregnancy rates compared to other countries. This review aims to clarify optimal individualized ovarian stimulation for improving the pregnancy rate per one oocyte retrieval cycle in Japan. We performed a literature review to describe ovarian stimulation, classification of infertile women depending on ovarian reserve and response, and Japanese ART data and discussed optimal conventional and mild ovarian stimulation protocols in Japan. According to Japanese ART registry data, the live birth rate of 30-35-year-old women was 32%-37% per ET cycle; therefore, four to five embryos are calculatedly needed when aiming a cumulative live birth rate of ≥80%. Mild stimulation aimed at collecting 5-10 oocytes can be alternative choice as an optimal ovarian stimulation protocol in young women. In 40-year-old women, the live birth rate is 18.8%, resulting in eight or more embryos as necessary. Conventional stimulation must be required in women with advanced age. In poor responders, however, mild stimulation may be sufficient for maximumly extracting their ovarian function. In Japan, mild ovarian stimulation can be selected in patients with a good prognosis and poor responders; however, conventional ovarian stimulation is necessary for women in advanced age.

Factors Affecting Artificial Insemination Pregnancy Outcome

Objective

The aim of the present study was to explore related clinical pregnancy outcome factors in intrauterine insemination (IUI).

Materials and Methods

The clinical data of 3984 IUI cycles in 1862 couples experiencing infertility who attended the Reproductive Center of Binzhou Medical University Hospital between July 2006 and July 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. Female and male patient age, endometrial thickness (EMT), the post-wash total motile sperm count (PTMC), artificial insemination timing, insemination frequency, and ovarian stimulation protocols were compared between the study’s pregnant group and non-pregnant group in order to explore any correlation.

Results

There were statistically significant differences in female and male age, EMT, artificial insemination timing, insemination frequency, and ovarian stimulation protocols between the two groups (p < 0.05). The clinical pregnancy rate was significantly higher in ovarian stimulation cycles than in natural cycles (21.2% and 11.6%, respectively; p < 0.01), the clinical pregnancy rate was significantly higher in double IUI than in single IUI (17.8% and 12.1%, respectively; p < 0.01), and EMT was significantly greater in the pregnant group than in the control group (p < 0.05). However, the differences in clinical pregnancy rates among the PTMC groups were not statistically significant (14.8%, 14.4%, 17.3%, and 17.3%, respectively; p > 0.05).

Conclusion

The results of the present study demonstrate that the clinical IUI pregnancy rate is correlated with the factors of female age, male age, EMT, artificial insemination timing, insemination frequency, and ovarian stimulation protocols; the ovarian stimulation protocol can noticeably improve the patient pregnancy outcome. Furthermore, compared with single IUI, double IUI can significantly increase the clinical pregnancy rate.

Should we still offer elective freezing of all embryos in all IVF cycles?

Elective 'freeze all', also called 'freeze only', refers to an IVF cycle where all embryos are frozen for later embryo transfer in a non-stimulated cycle, with the promise of increased success rates and prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) in most patients. However, 'freeze all' is associated with significantly higher perinatal complications including eclampsia, preeclampsia, chronic hypertension and large-for-gestational-age infants, without the demonstrated advantages of providing better results, except for a decrease in the incidence of OHSS, which should matter to women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and high responders to ovarian stimulation but not to all patients. 'Freeze all' is also suggested for all simulated IVF cycles, due to the alleged 'faulty endometrium' caused by ovarian stimulation. However, there is no direct evidence that asynchronous endometrium exists, and only if preovulatory progesterone level increase, can 'freeze all' confer an advantage. We conclude that an alleged diagnosis of 'faulty endometrium' should not be used as an indication for 'freeze all'. To offset the risk of OHSS more simply, less costly and less risky solutions such as mild ovarian stimulation, to dampen the number of oocytes and to aim for transfer of a single blastocyst, should be the preferred solution to treat women with PCOS and high responders for oocyte retrieval.

Higher probability of live-birth in high, but not normal, responders after first frozen-embryo transfer in a freeze-only cycle strategy compared to fresh-embryo transfer: a meta-analysis

STUDY QUESTION

Does the outcome of the comparison of live birth rates between the first frozen embryo transfer (ET) (in a freeze-only cycles strategy, i.e. frozen ET group) and a fresh embryo transfer (fresh ET group) differ considering the type of ovarian response?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Α significantly higher probability of live birth is present in high, but not normal, responders, after the first frozen ET in a freeze-only cycle strategy as compared to a fresh ET.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

It has been hypothesised that freezing all good embryos in a fresh in-vitro fertilisation (IVF) cycle and deferring embryo transfer in subsequent cycles may provide a more physiological endometrial environment for embryo implantation when compared to a fresh ET. However, currently, three relevant meta-analyses have been published with conflicting results, while none of them has taken into consideration the type of ovarian response. Recently, the publication of additional, large relevant randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in patients with different types of ovarian response makes possible the comparative evaluation of the first frozen ET (in a freeze-only cycle strategy) versus fresh ET, considering the type of ovarian response.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed aiming to identify RCTs comparing the first frozen ET (in a freeze-only cycle strategy) to a fresh ET. The main outcome was live birth, while secondary outcomes included ongoing pregnancy, clinical pregnancy, moderate/severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) and miscarriage.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

We identified eight eligible RCTs, including 5265 patients, which evaluated the first frozen ET in a freeze-only cycle strategy versus a fresh ET either in high responders (n = 4) or in normal responders (n = 4). No relevant RCTs were present in poor responders. Meta-analysis of weighted data using fixed and random effects model was performed. Results are reported as relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI).

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

Eligible RCTs were published between 2011 and 2018. Four RCTs (n = 3255 patients) compared the first frozen ET (in a freeze-only cycle strategy) to a fresh ET in normal responders and four RCTs (n = 2010 patients) did the comparison in high responders. In high responders, a significantly higher probability of live birth was observed in the frozen ET group when compared with the fresh ET group (RR: 1.18, 95% CI: 1.06-1.31; fixed effects model; heterogeneity: I2 = 0%; three studies; n = 3398 patients). However the probability of live birth was not significantly different between the frozen ET group and the fresh ET group in normal responders (RR: 1.13, 95% CI: 0.90-1.41; random effects model; heterogeneity: I2 = 77%; three studies; n = 1608 patients). The risk of moderate/severe OHSS was significantly lower in the frozen ET group when compared with the fresh ET group both in high (RR: 0.19, 95% CI: 0.10-0.37; fixed effects model; heterogeneity: not applicable; a single study; n = 1508 patients) and normal responders (RR: 0.39, 95% CI: 0.19-0.80; fixed effects model; heterogeneity: I2 = 0%; two studies; n = 2939 patients).

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

Considerable heterogeneity was present among the studies, regarding ovarian stimulation protocols and the triggering signal used for inducing final oocyte maturation as well as the cryopreservation methods, while the quality of evidence was poor for the live birth rate in high responders. Moreover, the analysis did not apply a standard for determining 'high' or 'normal' responders since the type of ovarian response followed the characterisation of populations as reported by the authors of the eligible studies.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

A freeze-only cycle strategy should be the preferred option in high responders since it enhances the probability of live birth, while reducing the chance of moderate/severe OHSS. In normal responders, the same strategy could be applied, in the interest of patient safety or clinic convenience, without compromising the chances of live birth.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

No external funding was used and there were no competing interests.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

PROSPERO registration number: CRD42018099389.

The stimulation protocol in poor responder IVF; a minimal or high-dose stimulation? - A meta-analysis

Background To determine whether a minimal stimulation (MS) or high-dose stimulation (HDS) protocol is a better option for patients classified as poor ovarian responders (POR) in terms of reproductive and pregnancy outcomes. Materials and methods A database search for evaluation of the study outcome by using meta-analysis method was carried out. The primary outcome was the clinical pregnancy (CP) rate for each of two groups, namely, the MS and HDS groups. The secondary outcomes were the gonadotropin dose used, duration of stimulation, cancellation rate, number of oocytes retrieved, number of fertilized oocytes, number of embryos transferred and live birth rates. Results Across five databases, 4670 potential studies for further screening were selected. But ultimately only six studies, three RCTs and three retrospective or case control studies were selected that meet the Bologna criteria for POR. In all there were 624 cycles. Our meta-analysis indicated that the CP rates, cycle cancellation rates, durations of stimulation, numbers of oocytes fertilized and numbers of embryos transferred were not statistically significant. Clearly, the number of oocytes retrieved in the MS group was significantly lower than in the HDS group, while the HDS group consumed significantly higher doses of gonadotropins than the MS group. The live birth rates were significantly higher in the MS group than in the HDS group. Conclusion MS should be the first-line protocol for managing POR because the live birth rate is significantly higher, even with fewer oocytes retrieved.

Letrozole supplementation during controlled ovarian stimulation in expected high responders: a pilot randomized controlled study

BACKGROUND

Almost all of the previous studies related with co-administration of letrozole in IVF cycles were performed in poor responders and letrozole may reduce the total gonadotropin dose required for ovarian stimulation, and the pregnancy rate did not decrease in poor responders. This study aimed to assess whether high responders co-treatment with letrozole reduced supraphysiological late follicular phase estradiol levels and the incidence of premature progesterone elevated at the end of the follicular phase, thereby impacting positively on endometrial receptivity.

METHODS

A randomized parallel controlled study in a university-affiliated center include 130 high responders between October 2015 and August 2016. The patients were randomized on the first stimulation day of the IVF cycle and from stimulation day 5 receive letrozole (group A) or without letrozole treatment (group B).

RESULTS

Although estradiol levels were significantly lower in the letrozole group (group A) (P < 0.001), progesterone elevation (> 1.5 ng/mL was considered as a rise) on the day of hCG triggering (15.4, 7.7%) was not statistically significant (P = 0.170). RecFSH, the recovery rate of eggs, the high-quality embryo rate, and the thickness of endometrium (P = 0.776) were similar between the letrozole group(group A) and control groups (group B). Clinical pregnancy rates were 53.1% (26/49) and 72.9% (35/48) in the letrozole and control groups, respectively, with a statistical significance (P = 0.043).Live birth rates were 42.9% (21/49) and 62.5% (30/48),showed a marginally significant difference (P = 0.053). The miscarriage rate did not significantly differ between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In this pilot study, letrozole supplementation could not reduce the incidence of premature progesterone rise during the late follicular phase in stimulated in vitro fertilization cycles in expected high responders, producing a harmful effect on the pregnancy outcome.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

China Clinical Trial Registration Center: ChiCTR-IPR-15006211 URL of the trial registry record: http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=10731 . Trial registration date: 8 April, 2015. Date of first patient's enrolment: 5 October, 2015.

Advanced Maternal Age in IVF: Still a Challenge? The Present and the Future of Its Treatment

Advanced maternal age (AMA; >35 year) is associated with a decline in both ovarian reserve and oocyte competence. At present, no remedies are available to counteract the aging-related fertility decay, however different therapeutic approaches can be offered to women older than 35 year undergoing IVF. This review summarizes the main current strategies proposed for the treatment of AMA: (i) oocyte cryopreservation to conduct fertility preservation for medical reasons or "social freezing" for non-medical reasons, (ii) personalized controlled ovarian stimulation to maximize the exploitation of the ovarian reserve in each patient, (iii) enhancement of embryo selection via blastocyst-stage preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies and frozen single embryo transfer, or (iv) oocyte donation in case of minimal/null residual chance of pregnancy. Future strategies and tools are in the pipeline that might minimize the risks of AMA through non-invasive approaches for embryo selection (e.g., molecular analyses of leftover products of IVF, such as spent culture media). These are yet challenging but potentially ground-breaking perspectives promising a lower clinical workload with a higher cost-effectiveness. We also reviewed emerging experimental therapeutic approaches to attempt at restoring maternal reproductive potential, e.g., spindle-chromosomal complex, pronuclear or mitochondrial transfer, and chromosome therapy. In vitro generation of gametes is also an intriguing challenge for the future. Lastly, since infertility is a social issue, social campaigns, and education among future generations are desirable to promote the awareness of the impact of age and lifestyle habits upon fertility. This should be a duty of the clinical operators in this field.

Double mild stimulation and egg collection in the same cycle for management of poor ovarian responders

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of double stimulations during the follicular and luteal phases in women with poor ovarian response (POR) in in-vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) cycles.

BASIC PROCEDURES

This prospective clinical study was performed in Royan Institute from October 2014 to January 2016. 121 patients were diagnosed as POR on the basis of Bologna criteria were included. Double stimulations were performed during the follicular and luteal phases by Letrozole, Clomid, hMG and GnRH-agonist. The patients' present cycle outcomes were compared with those of the previous cycle results using appropriate statistical tests.

MAIN FINDING

The total of 104 (85.9%) patients completed the stimulation stages. The analysis revealed the number of retrieved oocytes after the first and second stimulations did not differ (P = 0.2); however, the fertilization rate and the number of frozen embryos after the first stimulation were significantly higher than those of in the second stimulation (P < 0.001 and P = 0.03), indicating the better quality of retrieved oocytes after the first stimulation. The mean number of MII oocytes and the fertilization rate after Shanghai protocol were higher than those of the previous antagonist protocol with a substantial trend toward significance (P = 0.06), which can be clinically important. The cancellation rate (33%) due to no ovarian response and no embryo formation was still high in these patients.

PRINCIPAL CONCLUSION

Since the intensity of stimulation in both stages was mild, this protocol can be considered a time-efficient and patient friendly regime; however, more studies are required with emphasis on its cost-effectiveness.

Effects of Acupuncture on the Outcomes of Assisted Reproductive Technology: An Overview of Systematic Reviews

Objectives

To conclude the evidence from systematic reviews (SRs) and meta-analyses assessing the effectiveness of acupuncture to treat couples with subfertility undergoing ART.

Methods

We searched the major databases from their inception to March 2018: PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Database, Chongqing VIP, and Sino-Med (the Chinese database). The primary outcomes of the overview were live birth and clinical pregnancy, and secondary outcomes were ongoing pregnancy, miscarriage, and adverse events. Study selection, quality assessment, and data extraction were performed independently by two review authors. Review methodological quality was assessed by using the AMSTAR tool, and the quality of the evidence was rated by GRADE methods.

Results

Eleven systematic reviews were included and published between 2009 and 2017. Our study showed that the acupuncture treatment seems to be a useful tool to improve the clinical pregnancy rate in patients who undergo assisted reproduction therapy. However, there was no evidence that acupuncture had any effect on live birth rate, ongoing pregnancy rates, or miscarriage regardless of whether acupuncture was performed around the time of oocyte retrieval or around the day of embryo transfer; this evidence is inconclusive because of the low quality of the included studies.

Conclusions

The evidence for acupuncture to treat couples with subfertility undergoing ART remains unclear. Further research is needed, with high-quality trials undertaken and reported.

Low dose clomiphene citrate as a mild stimulation protocol in women with unsuspected poor in vitro fertilization result can generate more oocytes with optimal cumulative pregnancy rate

BACKGROUND

The use of long protocol during controlled ovarian stimulation for assisted reproduction attracts high dosage of gonadotropins. High dose of gonadotropins can be detrimental to oocyte development, which affects its quality and compromises the treatment outcome. Mild stimulation protocols that attract low dose gonadotropins could be useful alternative regimen to address such problems. This study evaluated the efficacy of low dose clomiphene citrate based protocol plus low dose gonadotropins on predicted normal responder patients who had unsuspected poor in vitro fertilization (IVF) result, following an initial stimulation with long gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist protocol.

METHODS

This a retrospective study of 65 infertile women who underwent 130 cycles in our center from January 2011 to December 2014. The initial IVF cycle (Group 1) was treated with long GnRH-a protocol plus a high dose of gonadotropins (≥150 IU/d), while second IVF cycle (Group 2) had low dose clomiphene citrate based protocol plus low dose gonadotropins (75-112.5 IU/d).

RESULTS

The rate of cumulative pregnancy/started cycle (9.2% [6/65] vs. 51% [33/65]; P < 0001) was significantly better in CC protocol than the long GnRH agonist protocol. The number of oocytes retrieved was also higher in CC protocol compared to the long protocol (7.26 ± 1.95 vs. 5.98 ± 1.31; P = 0.03). There was a lower number of patients without embryos (12.31% vs. 33.85%; p < 0.0001) in CC protocol than long protocol.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed a better cumulative pregnancy rate in the low dose CC based protocol. There was a higher number of oocytes retrieved after using a lower total dose of recombinant FSH in CC protocol. Thus, clomiphene treatment plus low dose rFSH can be an alternative option for such patients in second cycle stimulation instead of repeating long protocol regimen. Randomized controlled studies with larger number of patients will be needed for more accurate evidence.

Sequential clomiphene/corifollitrophin alpha as a technique for mild controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in IVF: a proof of concept study

PURPOSE

Mild controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH), combined with oocyte retrieval (OR) under local anaesthesia (LA), may provide low-impact IVF. Since a single injection of corifollitrophin alfa (CFA) provides 7 days of COH, we hypothesised that clomiphene-citrate (CC) followed by CFA may provide adequate COH response from one single FSH injection. Therefore, the aim was to assess IVF outcomes after a novel clomiphene citrate/CFA (CC/CFA) protocol, compared to women undergoing standard rFSH COH protocols (good prognosis comparative cohort:GPCC) in a 1:2 matched design.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this pilot study of 25 patients (ANZCTR id:ACTRN12612000740897, MINIVA:Minimal_Stimulation_in_IVF), we examined the effectiveness of oral clomiphene (100 mg-days 2-6) followed by CFA in a GnRH antagonist protocol producing a single injection COH stimulation regime. All OR were conducted under LA pre-ovarian block. Cycle outcomes were compared to a matched good prognosis comparative cohort (GPCC) undergoing standard rFSH COH.

RESULTS

Mild stimulation was achieved with less oocytes being collected compared to the GPCC (6.4 ± 0.7 vs. 10.7 ± 0.9, p < 0.001), resulting in a reduced number of good quality embryos available for transfer/cryopreservation (3.7 ± 0.6 vs. 5.7 ± 0.5, p = 0.01). While embryo quality was similar between the two groups, endometrial thickness was significantly lower in the group receiving CC/CFA. Pregnancy rates were significantly lower in the CC/CFA cohort compared to GPCC (31.8 vs. 57.1%, p = 0.04) and 44% of CC/CFA participants required supplemental rFSH in order to achieve the hCG trigger criteria.

CONCLUSION

Sequential clomiphene CFA protocol does not appear to be an optimal regime for low impact IVF treatment as it does not provide adequate COH from a single CFA injection and results in lower fresh embryo transfer pregnancy rates and fewer embryos for cryopreservation.

A study on the effectiveness of clomiphene citrate in comparison to GnRH antagonist in preventing LH surge among patients undergoing ovulation induction in IVF-ICSI

Abstract: Objective: To determine the efficacy of clomiphene citrate (CC) in preventing luteinizing hormone (LH) surge without adding gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist or GnRH agonist in stimulated first fresh intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycle by evaluating the outcome of oocytes and embryo quality. Design: Registry cohort study. Settings: Fertility Clinic Registry at Hospital University Kebangsaan Malaysia. Patients: A total of 235 fresh stimulated ICSI cycle for patients aged 18-40 years old using clomiphene citrate plus gonadotropin (n = 117) and GnRH antagonist plus gonadotropin (n = 118) were studied. Intervention: Comparing two different ovarian stimulation protocol. Main outcome measure(s): Social economical demographic, ovarian stimulation response and laboratory outcome. Fertilization rate as our primary outcome and our secondary outcome were oocyte retrieval rate, mature oocyte rate and top quality embryo rate. Result(s):There were no difference in the demographic and hormonal characteristic of the study groups. The primary outcome of fertilization rate has significant difference with p value of 0.003; 73.2% for CC group and 64.2% for GnRH antagonist group. The secondary outcome of OR rate (78.4% ± 17.6% VS 80.3% ± 13.4%, p = 0.368), mature oocyte rate (85.2% ± 19.0 VS 81.7% ± 16.7%, p = 0.130) and top quality embryo rate (79.4% ± 24.2% VS 74.9% ± 22.9%, p = 0.178) were comparable between both groups. There were significant difference between the endometrial thickness on the day of trigger and OHSS risk among both groups (8.5 mm ± 1.0 mm VS 9.4 mm ± 1.1 mm, p < 0.001 and 12.8% VS 44.1% respectively). Discussion: Minimal stimulation protocol with CC and gonadotropin may be the answer to many infertile couples in need of IVF and yet having financial situation deterring them in attempting IVF treatment. GnRH antagonist could be safely replaced by CC by extending to 10 days as this protocol gives better primary outcome and comparable secondary outcomes with less OHSS. CC is recognized to induce thinning of endometrial lining and thus, may impair embryo implantation. However, with advancement of the vitrification system and higher success rate in frozen-thaw embryo transfer worldwide provides an excellent solution for this issue.

FSH dose to stimulate different patient' ages: when less is more

Objective

To determine the effect of FSH doses on intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) outcomes according to the age of the patient.

Methods

Patients undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) for ICSI cycles in a university-affiliated in vitro fertilization center were split into age groups: ≤35 y.o. (n=1523); >35 and ≤38 y.o. (n=652); >38 and ≤40 y.o. (n=332); and >40 y.o. (n=370). The effect of FSH dose on COS, laboratorial and clinical outomes was determined by linear regression models.

Results

The FSH dose didn't affect the ovarian response in terms of total number of follicles, retrieved oocytes and mature oocytes within the age groups, but we found that the lower the age, the lower the FSH dose needed per oocyte retrieved. In the group of patients ≤35 y.o., we also found a positive effect of the FSH dose on oocyte yield. Despite that, for patients ≤38 y.o. there was a negative effect of the FSH dose on embryo quality and blastocyst formation rate, and an increase in the cycle's cancelation rate. In patients ≥39 y.o., there were no effects of the FSH doses on the analysed variables.

Conclusions

Ovarian stimulation with high doses of FSH is not recommended in younger women (≤38 y.o.), once we found a decrease in embryo quality and an increase in cycle's cancelation rate. Mild ovarian stimulation protocols may be more appropriate; however, it may not be applicable for women in advanced age, since a higher FSH dose is needed for oocyte retrieval in these patients.

Ovarian stimulated cycle: not a better alternative for women without ovulation disorder in intrauterine insemination

To explore the related factors on the clinical pregnancy outcome in intrauterine insemination, a retrospective study was conducted on the clinical data of 580 cycles for 301 infertile couples who were treated with intrauterine insemination. The female age, male age, duration of infertility, treatment protocols, endometrial thickness and sperm parameters were compared between pregnant group and non-pregnant group. The results showed that there were statistical differences in female age, duration of infertility and endometrial thickness between the two groups. The pregnancy rate was 19.34% in Group A (female age ≤ 30 y) compared with 10.91% in Group B (female age > 30 y). The pregnancy rate was 18.44% when the duration of infertility ≤ 2 years, which was higher than another group 10.73% when the duration of infertility > 2 years. Group analysis according to endometrial thickness (Group1: < 8 mm; Group 2: ≥ 8 mm and ≤ 12 mm; Group 3: > 12 mm) demonstrated significant differences in clinical pregnancy rate (7.41%, 18.00% and 11.48% respectively). For those infertile female without ovulation failure, the higher clinical pregnancy rates were observed in patients undergoing intrauterine insemination in natural cycle 16.12% when compared with the patients in ovarian stimulated cycles 10.48%. Thus, we demonstrate that the pregnancy rate is related with female age, duration of infertility and endometrial thickness. The ovarian stimulated cycle couldn’t improve the pregnancy outcome for those women without ovulation disorder in intrauterine insemination.

Mild stimulation for in vitro fertilization

It has been proven that the use of high gonadotropin dose does not necessarily improve the final outcome of IVF. Mild ovarian stimulation is based on the principle of optimal utilization of competent oocytes/embryos and endometrial receptivity. There is growing evidence that the pregnancy or live birth rates with mild-stimulation protocols are comparable to those with conventional IVF; the cumulative pregnancy outcome has been shown to be no different, despite having fewer numbers of oocytes or embryos available with milder ovarian stimulation. Although equally effective, mild-stimulation IVF is associated with a greater safety profile, in terms of the incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome and venous thromboembolism. It is also found to be better tolerated by patients and less expensive. Emerging research evidence may lead to widespread acceptance of mild IVF, by both patients and IVF providers, and make IVF more accessible to women and couples worldwide.

In vitro fertilization treatments with the use of clomiphene citrate or letrozole

There has been increasing interest in combining the oral agents clomiphene citrate (CC) and letrozole with gonadotropins in IVF: for poor responders to reduce the amount of gonadotropins used, and in normal responders to reduce the incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation (OHSS). In normal responders, mild stimulation with the use of CC and gonadotropins was found to decrease the number of oocytes retrieved and result in good pregnancy rates, but in most studies the cumulative pregnancy rate was lower compared with conventional ovarian stimulation when frozen embryo transfers were considered. Coadministration of letrozole and gonadotropins has mainly been used in patients with breast cancer to prevent the massive elevation of serum E₂ concentrations with the use of standard controlled ovarian hyperstimulation. CC and letrozole have both been used with gonadotropins in poor responders and have been shown to reduce the amount of gonadotropin used without reducing the pregnancy rate. Letrozole use with gonadotropins in IVF cycles may increase endometrial receptivity by increasing integrin expression in the endometrium and by lowering estrogen concentrations to more physiologic levels.

Neonatal outcomes and congenital malformations in children born after human menopausal gonadotropin and medroxyprogesterone acetate treatment cycles

PURPOSE

To investigate neonatal outcomes and congenital malformations in children born after in vitro fertilization (IVF) and vitrified embryo transfer cycles using human menopausal gonadotrophin and medroxyprogesterone acetate (hMG + MPA) treatment.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study including 4596 live born babies. During January 2014-June 2016, children born after either hMG + MPA treatment, gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist short protocol, or mild ovarian stimulation were included. The main outcome measures were neonatal outcomes and congenital malformations.

RESULTS

Neonatal outcomes both for singletons and twins such as mean birth weight and length, gestational age, the frequency of preterm birth were comparable between groups. Rate of stillbirth and perinatal death were also similar. No significant differences were found in the overall incidence of congenital malformations between the three groups. Multivariable logistic regression indicated that hMG + MPA regimen did not significantly increase the risk of congenital malformations compared with short protocol and mild ovarian stimulation, with adjusted odds ratio of 1.22 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.61-2.44] and 1.38 (CI 0.65-2.93), respectively, after adjusting for confounding factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggested that compared with conventional ovarian stimulations, hMG + MPA treatment neither compromised neonatal outcomes of IVF newborns, nor did increase the prevalence of congenital malformations.

Mild versus conventional antagonist ovarian stimulation protocols in expected normal responders undergoing IVF/ICSI: a case-control study

Mild controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) protocols combining clomiphene citrate (CC) or letrozole with gonadotropins were introduced as an effective alternative of conventional COH in normal responders undergoing IVF/ICSI. In this case-control study, we compared 41 participants treated with a mild stimulation protocol receiving gonadotropins combined with either CC (n = 24) or letrozole (n = 17) with 71 subfertile participants with matching baseline characteristics, conforming with the same inclusion criteria and treated with a conventional antagonist protocol. Live birth was determined in reduced rates in the study group compared to the control group, reaching marginal statistical significance [4/41 versus 19/71, p = 0.050], as also in the respective number of clinical pregnancies [6/41 versus 22/71, p = 0.054], although the incidence of miscarriage was similar for both groups [2/41 versus 5/71, p = 0.714]. Most of the secondary parameters examined, favored the conventional antagonist protocol. There was no difference in any of the outcomes reported between the three different stimulation groups in post-hoc analysis. Mild stimulation regimens with the aid of either CC or letrozole employing GnRH antagonists do not seem to constitute an equally effective method as compared to the conventional antagonist protocol to be offered in good prognosis subfertile women seeking an induced cycle toward IVF/ICSI.

Mild Versus Conventional Ovarian Stimulation for Poor Responders Undergoing IVF/ICSI

BACKGROUND/AIM

Mild stimulation protocols have been implemented to be offered to subfertile patients who respond poorly to ovarian stimulation. We aimed to compare the efficacy of mild versus conventional gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH)-agonist and antagonist protocols in poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilization/intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) cycles.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 58 poorly-responding patients were divided into two groups: mild group (n=33), receiving clomiphene citrate 100 mg and 0.25 mg of cetrorelix with 150 IU of gonadotrophins daily; conventional group (n=25), undergoing the long GnRH-agonist or -antagonist protocols. The primary outcome was the number of cumulus oocyte complexes (COCs) retrieved.

RESULTS

A lower number of COCs [median (range)=1 (0-4) vs. 3 (0-8.4), p<0.001] was retrieved in the mild stimulation compared to the conventional group. Secondary outcomes favored the conventional group, whereas live birth (9.1% vs. 12%), clinical pregnancy (12.1% vs. 20%) and miscarriage rate (40% vs. 40%) were similar in the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Mild ovarian stimulation is inferior to conventional regimes when applied to poor responders undergoing IVF/ICSI, in terms of the numbers of retrieved COCs.

A Higher Ovarian Response after Stimulation for IVF Is Related to a Higher Number of Euploid Embryos

This study has analysed the relationship between ovarian response and the number of euploid embryos. This is a post hoc analysis of a subset of data generated during a prospective cohort study previously published. Forty-six oocyte donors were subjected to ovarian stimulation with 150 IU of rFSH and 75 IU of hp-hMG in a GnRH agonist long protocol. Preimplantation genetic screening was performed in all viable embryos. We observed a positive relationship between ovarian response and the number of euploid embryos. When ovarian response was above the median (≥17 oocytes), the mean number of euploid embryos per donor was 5.0 ± 2.4, while when <17 oocytes were obtained the mean number of euploid embryos was 2.7 ± 1.4 (p = 0.000). Aneuploidy rate did not increase with ovarian response or gonadotropin doses. Also, the number of euploid embryos was inversely related to the amount of gonadotropins needed per oocyte obtained (ovarian sensitivity index). These results suggest that the number of euploid embryos available for embryo transfer increases as the number of oocytes obtained does. Considering the total number of euploid embryos seems more relevant than the aneuploidy rate.

Ovarian stimulation protocols for IVF: is more better than less?

Conventional ovarian stimulation protocols for IVF are designed to achieve maximum oocyte yields. Conventional protocols, however, are associated with patient discomfort, increased risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome and higher costs. In recent years, mild stimulation protocols have risen in popularity. These protocols typically use lower doses (≤150 IU/day), shorter duration of exogenous gonadotrophins, or both, compared with conventional protocols, with the goal of limiting the number of retrieved oocytes to less than eight. The pregnancy rate per cycle (fresh embryo transfer only) is lower with mild stimulation compared with conventional stimulation; however, the cumulative pregnancy rate seems to be comparable between the approaches. Reports are conflicting on the effects of mild versus conventional stimulation on embryo quality. This article expands on a live debate held at the American Society for Reproductive Medicine 2015 Annual Meeting to compare the advantages and disadvantages of the 'more is better' (conventional protocol) versus 'less is best' (mild protocol) approaches to ovarian stimulation. Both protocols are associated with benefits and challenges, and physicians must consider the needs of the individual patient when determining the best treatment options. Further prospective studies comparing a variety of outcomes with conventional and mild stimulation are needed.

Avoiding OHSS: Controlled Ovarian Low-Dose Stimulation in Women with PCOS

The polycystic ovary syndrome is a common endocrine disorder which influences outcome and potential risks involved with controlled ovarian stimulation for artificial reproductive techniques (ART). Concrete practical recommendations for the dosage of gonadotropins, the preferred protocol and preventive methods to avoid ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) are lacking. We present retrospective data of 235 individually calculated gonadotropin low-dose stimulations for ART in a single center from 2012 to 2014. Clinical data and outcome parameter of patients diagnosed with PCOS according to Rotterdam criteria (n = 39) were compared with patients without PCOS (n = 196). The starting dose of gonadotropins was individually calculated depending on patients' age, BMI, ovarian reserve, ovarian response in previous cycles, and diagnostic criteria of PCOS. Mean age and duration of infertility did not differ between the groups, whereas mean BMI (p = 0.007) and AMH (p < 0.001) were higher in the PCOS-group. A lower mean FSH-starting and maximum dose was administered to women with PCOS (p < 0.001). The biochemical pregnancy rate of 42.4 % and the clinical pregnancy rate of 32.2 % for PCOS-patients did not differ from those of the control group (42.2 % and 34.4 % respectively). Neither mild, nor moderate or severe manifestation of OHSS occurred significantly more often in patients with PCOS. Our study supports the use of a calculated low-dose FSH-stimulation strategy in ART for patients with PCOS. Further randomized clinical trials should confirm this strategy and lead to define individual risk factors for OHSS, which can be used for recommendation of safer ART-techniques like in vitro maturation.

GnRH agonist trigger for the induction of oocyte maturation in GnRH antagonist IVF cycles: a SWOT analysis

Gonadotrophin releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) trigger is effective in the induction of oocyte maturation and prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome during IVF treatment. This trigger concept, however, results in early corpora lutea demise and consequently luteal phase dysfunction and impaired endometrial receptivity. The aim of this strenghths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats analysis was to summarize the progress made over the past 15 years to optimize ongoing pregnancy rates after GnRHa trigger. The advantages and potential drawbacks of this type of triggering are reviewed. The current approach to the management of GnRHa trigger in autologous cycles is based on the peak serum oestradiol level or follicle number and aims at a fresh embryo transfer or a segmentation approach with elective cryopreservation policy. We recommend intensive luteal support with transdermal oestradiol and intramuscular progesterone alone if peak serum oestradiol is 4000 or more pg/ml after GnRHa trigger or dual trigger with GnRHa and HCG 1000 IU if peak serum oestradiol is less than 4000 pg/mL. On the contrary, we recommend HCG 1500 IU 35 h after GnRHa trigger if there are less than 25 follicles, or freeze all oocytes or embryos if there are over 25 follicles.

New Generation IVF - What does it mean?

What will be the future of IVF taking into account the growing attention of health care providers: will providing the best success-rate per trial by using more and more innovative techniques become our only goal or should we also focus on a strategy to reduce costs wherever possible. A go-together of both strategies seems to be the best option to convince governments and health care providers to further support the use of assisted reproductive technologies. To provide cost-effective, high quality and affordable IVF should be our main concern not only from an economical but also from an ethical point of view.

A global perspective on assisted reproductive technology fertility treatment: an 8-country fertility specialist survey

BACKGROUND

Procedures that may optimize success in achieving live births from assisted reproductive technology (ART) continue to be examined. Not yet considered are the perspectives of fertility specialists regarding important developments in the fertility treatment field, current unmet needs, and anticipated future advances. In the current study, an 8-country survey of fertility specialists was conducted to provide a comprehensive, global depiction of fertility treatments across different regions.

METHODS

Fertility specialists from France, Germany, Italy, Spain, the United Kingdom (UK), the United States (US), China, and Japan were invited to participate in an online survey. Participants were eligible if they personally managed ≥25 patients/month who were experiencing difficulty conceiving, and if they had performed ART fertility treatment with ≥1 patient in the previous month. Quantitative questions addressed the number of patients seen, main infertility causes, number of cycles performed, ART procedure type, and ART outcomes. Qualitative questions covered diagnostic trends, unmet needs, important advances, and expected future developments.

RESULTS

The number of fertility specialists who completed the survey included 29 in France, 33 in Germany, 23 in Italy, 38 in Spain, 34 in the UK, 91 in the US, 50 in China, and 65 in Japan. Patient volume increased over the prior 2 years according to 67 % (242/363) of the fertility specialists. As expected, ART outcomes all declined with age in all countries. ART outcomes varied by country, with the highest implantation, pregnancy, and live birth rates reported by fertility specialists in the US and China and the lowest rates reported in France and Italy. The most frequently reported unmet needs in fertility treatment were financial coverage, improved implantation rate, and egg donation. Most frequently named future advancements expected to change the fertility treatment field included improved embryo selection through imaging and/or metabolomics, improved embryo implantation rate, and use of preimplantation genetic diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

This study, which follows a rigorous survey methodology, elucidates the current state of fertility specialists' practices and perspectives on the global fertility treatment field, which highlights differences and similarities among countries. This research may inform further studies and procedural developments that might better improve and standardize ART.

Factors affecting embryo viability and uterine receptivity: insights from an analysis of the UK registry data

Many studies have identified prognostic factors for IVF treatment outcome; however, little information is available on the mechanism of their action. Embryo-uterus models have the potential to distinguish between factors acting on the embryo directly and those acting through the uterine environment. Here we apply embryo-uterus models to comprehensive UK registry data from two periods, 2000-2005 and 2007-2011, containing 139,444 and 226,542 embryo transfer cycles, respectively. Given this large dataset, the embryo-uterus model is capable of distinguishing between uterine and embryo effects. Maternal age is the predominant predictor of live birth and acts on both the embryo and uterine components, but with larger effects on the embryo. Prolonged embryo culture is associated with greater embryo viability, reflecting the greater degree of selection, but is also associated with greater uterine receptivity. Cryopreserved embryos are less viable and were associated with poorer uterine receptivity. This work suggests that, in addition to the direct effects of in-vitro culture on the embryonic environment during the first few days of the embryo's life, the delay in transfer after extended culture or cryopreservation can lead to an altered uterine environment for the embryo after transfer.

Why more is less and less is more when it comes to ovarian stimulation

PURPOSE

The purpose of the present study is to describe the possible mechanisms which may explain the apparent paradox of "less is more." Mild ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization (IVF) minimizes ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) and multiple gestations without compromising the pregnancy rate (PR).

METHODS

The pertinent English literature (PubMed) addressing mild stimulation for IVF/assisted reproductive technology (ART) and publications addressing "mild" or "soft" controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) vs conventional COS for IVF, OHSS, natural cycle IVF, and IVF outcome in association with COS was searched.

RESULTS

Four possible mechanisms can be put forward to explain the apparent paradox of "less is more." (1) In the natural or mild stimulation cycles, the healthiest follicles are selected by the principle of "quality for quantity"; (2) high estradiol (E2) in the late follicular phase significantly correlated with higher rates of small for gestational age (SGA) and low-birth-weight (LBW) neonates; (3) anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH), LH, testosterone, and E(2) are significantly higher in natural cycle (NC)-IVF than in stimulated IVF follicles, suggesting an alteration of the follicular metabolism in stimulated cycles; and (4) supraphysiological E(2) may increase the growth hormone-binding protein (GH-BP) bio-neutralizing GH and diminishing the resultant insulin-like growth factor (IGF) levels, necessary for optimal synergism with follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH).

CONCLUSIONS

It is suggested to aim at the retrieval of around eight to ten eggs. Mild stimulation should be the common practice for IVF. In cases where more than ten ova are retrieved or high E(2) levels are reached, either intentionally or unintentionally, "freeze-all policy" should be considered and embryo transfer (ET) done in a subsequent natural cycle.

Assessing ovarian response: antral follicle count versus anti-Müllerian hormone

Oocyte number and quality decline with age; however, fertility varies significantly even among women of the same age. Various measures have been developed to predict response to ovarian stimulation and reproductive potential. Evaluation of ovarian reserve can identify patients who may experience poor response or hyper-response to exogenous gonadotrophins and can aid in the personalization of treatment to achieve good response and minimize risks. In recent years, two key methods, antral follicle count (AFC), an ultrasound biomarker of follicle number, and the concentration of serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), a hormone biomarker of follicle number, have emerged as preferred methods for assessing ovarian reserve. In this review, a live debate held at the American Society for Reproductive Medicine 2013 Annual Meeting is expanded upon to compare the predictive values, merits, and disadvantages of AFC and AMH level. An ovarian reserve measure without limitations has not yet been discovered, although both AFC and AMH have good predictive value. Published evidence, however, as well as the objectivity and potential standardization of AMH level and the convenience of testing any time throughout the menstrual cycle, leans towards AMH level becoming the gold-standard biomarker to evaluate ovarian reserve and predict ovarian response to stimulation.

Mild ovarian stimulation with clomiphene citrate launch is a realistic option for in vitro fertilization

OBJECTIVE

To validate the use of clomiphene citrate in IVF when mild stimulation approaches are chosen to reduce patient discomfort, risk, and cost.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

SETTING

Private IVF clinic.

PATIENT(S)

A total of 163 patients undergoing IVF and with a good prognosis (defined as ≤38 years old with normal ovarian reserve and normovulatory cycles, body mass index <29 kg/m(2), no previous assisted reproductive technology cycles, no severe endometriosis, no history of recurrent miscarriage, no endocrine/autoimmune diseases, and no surgical semen extraction).

INTERVENTION(S)

Mild stimulation using a fixed protocol of clomiphene citrate (100 mg/d from cycle days 3 to 7) in combination with low doses of gonadotropins (150 IU of recombinant FSH on cycle days 5, 7, and 9) and GnRH antagonist.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

The cumulative delivery rate per patient after three fresh and/or frozen embryo transfers and time to pregnancy.

RESULT(S)

No dropouts were observed. The cumulative delivery rate was 70%, and the mean time to pregnancy was 2.4 months.

CONCLUSION(S)

Mild stimulation using clomiphene citrate in combination with low doses of gonadotropins can be considered a realistic option for good-prognosis patients undergoing IVF.

Efficacy and safety of late-start Corifollitropin-alfa administration for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in IVF: a cohort, case-control study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate efficacy and safety of a controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) protocol in which a single dose of Corifollitropin-alfa (CFα) was administered on day 4 of a GnRH-antagonist cycle.

DESIGN

Cohort case-control study.

SETTING

University Hospital.

PATIENTS

One hundred twenty-two normally cycling women expected to be normal responders to COS.

INTERVENTIONS

In 61 patients, CFα (100-150 μg) was injected subcutaneously on day 4 of a spontaneous menstrual cycle; a GnRH-antagonist was added from day 8 (fixed protocol; 0.25 mg/day). If needed to complete follicular maturation, recombinant FSH (rFSH) daily injections (150/200 IU/day) were given from day 11. A control group of 61 matched women was stimulated with daily subcutaneous injections of rFSH (100-150 U/day) from day 4 of the cycle, and received GnRH-antagonist (0.25 mg/day) from day 8. IVF or ICSI was performed according to the sperm characteristics, and 1-2 embryos were transferred in utero under US guidance on day 2.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Number of retrieved cumulus-oocyte complexes (COCs), clinical pregnancy rate (PR), implantation rate (IR), ongoing PR at 10 weeks, number of injections/cycle, ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) rate.

RESULTS

No cycle was cancelled and the mean number of retrieved COCs was comparable in patients and controls. About 60% of CF-alfa treated women had no need of daily rFSH addition, and the mean number of injections/cycle was significantly lower in the CF-alfa group than in controls (p < 0.05). The ongoing PR/transfer was 36.8% in CF-alfa group and 37.5% in controls. No patient developed severe OHSS, and the incidence of moderate OHSS was similar in cases and controls.

CONCLUSIONS

CFα may be started on day 4 of the cycle obtaining results comparable to those of a COS using day 4-start daily rFSH, with significantly less injections and a similar risk of OHSS.

Ovarian stimulation for IVF: mild approaches

In contrast to current approaches, the aim of mild stimulation is to develop safer and more patient-friendly protocols in which the risks of the treatment as a whole are minimized. Mild stimulation is defined as the method when exogenous gonadotropins are administered at lower doses, and/or for a shorter duration in GnRH antagonist co-treated cycles, or when oral compounds (antiestrogens, aromatase inhibitors) are used for ovarian stimulation for IVF, with the aim of limiting the number of oocytes obtained to fewer than eight. In this chapter we discuss the relevant physiology of follicle development, the development of milder stimulation protocols, the implications of mild stimulation, the current state of affairs, and future developments.

Impact of exogenous gonadotropin stimulation on circulatory and follicular fluid cytokine profiles

Background. The natural cycle is the prototype to which we aspire to emulate in assisted reproduction techniques. Increasing evidence is emerging that controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) with exogenous gonadotropins may be detrimental to oogenesis, embryo quality, and endometrial receptivity. This research aimed at assessing the impact of COH on the intrafollicular milieu by comparing follicular fluid (FF) cytokine profiles during stimulated in vitro fertilization (IVF) and modified natural cycle (MNC) IVF. Methods. Ten women undergoing COH IVF and 10 matched women undergoing MNC IVF were recruited for this pilot study. 40 FF cytokine concentrations from individual follicles and plasma were measured by fluid-phase multiplex immunoassay. Demographic/cycle/cytokine data were compared and correlations between cytokines were computed. Results. No significant differences were found between COH and MNC groups for patient and cycle demographics, including outcome. Overall mean FF cytokine levels were higher in the MNC group for 29/40 cytokines, significantly so for leukaemia inhibitory factor and stromal cell-derived factor-1α. Furthermore, FF MNC cytokine correlations were significantly stronger than for COH data. Conclusions. These findings suggest that COH perturbs intrafollicular cytokine networks, in terms of both cytokine levels and their interrelationships. This may impact oocyte maturation/fertilization and embryo developmental competence.

The "graying" of infertility services: an impending revolution nobody is ready for

BACKGROUND

As demand for infertility services by older women continues to grow, because achievable in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes are widely underestimated, most fertility centers do not offer maximal treatment options with use of autologous oocytes. Limited data suggest that clinical IVF outcomes in excess of what the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) considers "futile" can, likely, be achieved up to at least age 45 years.

METHODS

In an attempt to point out an evolving demographic trend in IVF, we here report our center's IVF data for 2010-2012 and national U.S. data for 1997-2010. Though our center's data are representative of only one IVF center's patients, they, likely, are unique since they probably represent the most adversely selected IVF patient population ever reported and, thus, are predictive of future demographic trends. In addition we performed a systematic review of the literature on the subject based on PubMed, Medline and Google Scholar searches till year-end 2013. The literature search was performed using key words and phrases relevant to fertility treatments in older women.

RESULTS

As demonstrated by our center's patient demographics and national U.S. data, IVF centers are destined to treat increasingly adversely selected patients. Despite our center's already extremely adversely selected patient population, age-specific IVF cycle outcomes in women above age 40 years, nevertheless, exceeded criteria for "futility" by the ASRM and widely quoted outcome expectations in the literature for patient ages. Age 43 discriminates between better and poorer clinical pregnancy and live birth rates.

CONCLUSIONS

"Graying" of the infertility populations in the developed world, a problem with potentially far-reaching medical and societal consequences, has so far been only insufficiently addressed in the literature. As women's postmenopausal life spans already exceed postmenarcheal life spans at the start of the 20th century, the "graying" of infertility services can be expected to further accelerate, no longer as in recent decades bringing only women in their 40s into maternity wards but also women in their 50s and 60s. Medicine and society better get ready for this revolution.