A national quality incentive scheme to reduce antibiotic overuse in hospitals: evaluation of perceptions and impact

A systematic review of national interventions and policies to optimize antibiotic use in healthcare settings in England

OBJECTIVES

To identify and assess the effectiveness of national antibiotic optimization interventions in primary and secondary care in England (2013-2022).

METHODS

A systematic scoping review was conducted. Literature databases (Embase and Medline) were used to identify interventions and evaluations. Reports included the UK AMR Strategy (2013-2018), National Action Plan (2019-2024) and English Surveillance Programme for Antimicrobial Utilisation and Resistance (ESPAUR) reports (2014-2022). The design, focus and quality of evaluations and the interventions' effectiveness were extracted.

FINDINGS

Four hundred and seventy-seven peer-reviewed studies and 13 reports were screened. One hundred and three studies were included for review, identifying 109 interventions in eight categories: policy and commissioning (n = 9); classifications (n = 1); guidance and toolkits (n = 22); monitoring and feedback (n = 17); professional engagement and training (n = 19); prescriber tools (n = 12); public awareness (n = 17); workforce and governance (n = 12).Most interventions lack high-quality effectiveness evidence. Evaluations mainly focused on clinical, microbiological or antibiotic use outcomes, or intervention implementation, often assessing how interventions were perceived to affect behaviour. Only 16 interventions had studies that quantified effects on prescribing, of which six reported reductions. The largest reduction was reported with structural-level interventions and attributed to a policy and commissioning intervention (primary care financial incentives). Behavioural interventions (guidance and toolkits) reported the greatest impact in hospitals.

CONCLUSIONS

Many interventions have targeted antibiotic use, each pulling different levers across the health system simultaneously. On the basis of these studies, structural-level interventions may have the greatest impact. Collectively, the combination of interventions may explain England's decline in prescribing but direct evidence of causality is unavailable.

The mediating role of incentives in association between leadership attention and self-perceived continuous improvement in infection prevention and control among medical staff: A cross-sectional survey

Objectives

Promoting improvement in Infection Prevention and Control (IPC) is an important part of improving the quality of care. The influence of leadership attention and incentives on the self-perceived continuous improvement in IPC has drawn a lot of attention, but relevant academic research is still lacking. The objective of this study is to explore the effect of leadership attention on self-perceived continuous improvement in IPC among medical staff and its underlying mechanisms.

Method

The 3,512 medical staff from 239 health facilities in Hubei, China, were surveyed online during September 2020. Data on leadership attention, incentives, and improvement in Infection Prevention and Control were collected using self-administered questionnaires. Correlation analysis was used to analyze the relationship between leadership attention, incentives, and improvement in Infection Prevention and Control. Amos 24.0 was used to analyze the mediating role.

Results

The scores of leadership attention, incentives and self-perceived continuous improvement in Infection Prevention and Control were all high. The score of leadership attention was the highest (4.67 ± 0.59), followed by self-perceived continuous improvement (4.62 ± 0.59) and incentives in Infection Prevention and Control (4.12 ± 0.83). Leadership attention positively affected self-perceived continuous improvement in Infection Prevention and Control (β = 0.85, 95% CI = [0.83, 0.87]). Moreover, incentives partially mediated the effect of leadership attention on self-perceived continuous improvement in Infection Prevention and Control among medical staff (β = 0.13, 95% CI = [0.12, 0.15]).

Conclusion

Leadership attention positively affects self-perceived continuous improvement in Infection Prevention and Control among medical staff, and incentives mediates this relationship. The present study has valuable implications for self-perceived continuous improvement in Infection Prevention and Control from the perspective of leadership attention and incentives.

Evaluating the long-term impact of an antimicrobial stewardship programme in a Central London mixed medical and surgical intensive care unit

Background

Antimicrobial overuse causes increased antimicrobial resistance in ICUs; antimicrobial stewardship programmes (ASPs) aim to optimize usage. Following an MDR Acinetobacter baumannii (MRAb) outbreak in 2008, an ASP was implemented at a London ICU, and then continued as a long-term programme. This study aimed to determine long-term changes in antimicrobial prescribing 9 years on.

Methods

Data were collected from ICU patients in 2008 immediately before ASP implementation, and thereafter for 6 month cohort periods in 2010-2011, 2012 and 2017. Antimicrobial usage in DDD per 1000 occupied bed days (OBD) were compared. Multivariate linear regression models for antimicrobial days were fitted, adjusting for APACHE II score and patient days. Antimicrobial resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa (as an indicator organism) was compared across cohort periods.

Findings

Across 400 patients over 9 years, antimicrobial use changed significantly (P < 0.011) and remained lower in all post-ASP cohorts compared with pre-ASP [(2008; 1827 DDD/1000 OBD), (2010; 1264 DDD/1000 OBD), (2012; 1270 DDD/1000 OBD) and (2017; 1566 DDD/1000 OBD)]. There was reduction in usage of all antimicrobial classes except β-lactams (where there was no significant increase nor decrease, P = 0.178) and aminoglycosides (where there was a significant increase in usage, P < 0.0001). The latter was temporally associated with restrictions on specific carbapenems. There was an increase in carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa in 2012 only (P = 0.028) but not subsequently.

Conclusions

Following ASP implementation after an outbreak of MRAb, reduced antimicrobial prescribing was maintained 9 years on. We identify several factors influencing successful long-term maintenance of ASPs in ICUs.

Change in use of pediatric oral antibiotics in Japan, pre- and post-implementation of an antimicrobial resistance action plan

BACKGROUND

Most antimicrobials are prescribed to outpatients, making outpatient antibiotic prescription an important target for antibiotic stewardship. A national antimicrobial resistance (AMR) action plan was developed in 2016 by the Japanese government with various antimicrobials steawardship activities for pediatric outpatients. We aimed to evaluate changes in antibiotic use pre- and post-implementation of the AMR action plan.

METHODS

All antimicrobials prescribed to pediatric outpatients in Japan from 2011 to 2018 were retrospectively analyzed using data from a national database. Antimicrobials dispensed for patients aged ≤19 years were reviewed. Antimicrobial use was surveyed by age, year of use, type of antimicrobial prescribed, and prescribing facility. Five cities were selected as pilot areas to investigate the variations, based on the clinical specialties of the prescribing physicians.

RESULTS

Antimicrobial usage varied with age. Specifically, usage decreased post-AMR in patients aged ≤8 years and increased in those aged >15 years. Further, antimicrobial prescriptions tended to decrease after 2016 in primary care clinics and hospitals. In the pilot areas of the study, 35% of all oral antimicrobials were prescribed in otolaryngology departments, and 8% were prescribed in dermatology clinics. Notably, antimicrobial prescriptions from both departments showed an upward trend from 2011 to 2018.

CONCLUSION

The use of antimicrobial agents decreased in children younger than 8 years in pediatric clinics, hospitals, and internal medicine clinics. However, use increased in children older than 15 years and in other specialty clinics. Settings with an increasing use of antimicrobials are potential targets for the next antibiotic stewardship program and should be investigated in detail.

Impact of hospital antibiotic use on patient-level risk of death among 36,124,372 acute and medical admissions in England

OBJECTIVES

Initiatives to curb hospital antibiotic use might be associated with harm from under-treatment. We examined the extent to which variation in hospital antibiotic prescribing is associated with mortality risk in acute/general medicine inpatients.

METHODS

This ecological analysis examined Hospital Episode Statistics from 36,124,372 acute/general medicine admissions (≥16y) to 135 acute hospitals in England, 01/April/2010-31/March/2017. Random-effects meta-regression was used to investigate whether heterogeneity in adjusted 30-day mortality was associated with hospital-level antibiotic use, measured in defined-daily-doses (DDD)/1,000 bed-days. Models also considered DDDs/1,000 admissions and DDDs for narrow-spectrum/broad-spectrum antibiotics, parenteral/oral, and local interpretations of World Health Organization Access, Watch, and Reserve antibiotics.

RESULTS

Hospital-level antibiotic DDDs/1,000 bed-days varied 15-fold with comparable variation in broad-spectrum, parenteral, and Reserve antibiotic use. After extensive adjusting for hospital case-mix, the probability of 30-day mortality changed -0.010% (95% CI: -0.064,+0.044) for each increase of 500 hospital-level antibiotic DDDs/1,000 bed-days. Analyses of other metrics of antibiotic use showed no consistent association with mortality risk.

CONCLUSIONS

We found no evidence that wide variation in hospital antibiotic use is associated with adjusted mortality risk in acute/general medicine inpatients. Using low-prescribing hospitals as benchmarks could help drive safe and substantial reductions in antibiotic consumption of up-to one-third in this population.

Understanding farmers' and veterinarians' behavior in relation to antimicrobial use and resistance in dairy cattle: A systematic review

To tackle antimicrobial resistance, it is vital that farmers' and veterinarians' antimicrobial use behaviors and attitudes toward resistance are understood so that we can identify how beliefs and motives influence practices. Current literature details qualitative and quantitative research that explores the knowledge, attitudes and perceptions of dairy farmers and veterinarians with respect to antimicrobial resistance and antimicrobial practices, and the reported findings are varied and conflicting. Our objective was to conduct a systematic review to assess the evidence and knowledge gaps in the published literature. We identified articles via database searches of Embase, Medline, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science; we limited findings to published articles available in English with no publication year restrictions. Article screening was conducted at 3 levels: title, abstract, and full text. Of the 349 articles identified, 35 were retained for systematic review. Transparency of reporting was assessed for each study using the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) framework. Quality was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme qualitative checklist. Findings relating to dairy farmers' and veterinarians' knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions on antimicrobial resistance and practices were thematically analyzed. The comprehensiveness of reporting was variable: studies reported 5 to 26 of the 32 COREQ checklist items. Five key themes emerged from the data: knowledge and awareness of antimicrobial resistance; factors influencing farmer and veterinarian decision-making; perceived barriers and facilitators to reduced antimicrobial use; perceived responsibility for antimicrobial resistance; and the role of the farmer and veterinarian relationship in reducing antimicrobial use. Awareness of prudent antimicrobial use was not uniform between studies. Many factors influence farmers' and veterinarians' decisions to use antimicrobials, including animal welfare and available resources. The farmer-veterinarian relationship is a potential barrier or facilitator of reduced antimicrobial use, depending on the perceived relationship dynamic. Encouraging collaboration between farmers and veterinarians could lead to shared responsibility for reducing antimicrobial use. This review provided a coherent picture of what is currently known and identified gaps in the current knowledge to inform future behavioral intervention research. Increased knowledge, skill development, resources, engagement, and further research to address the gaps we identified are the main recommendations to effectively overcome barriers, elicit appropriate behavior change, and achieve reduced antimicrobial use in dairy cattle.

Evaluation of evidence-based urinalysis reflex to culture criteria: Impact on reducing antimicrobial usage

OBJECTIVES

To implement evidence-based urinalysis (UA) reflex criteria and to evaluate the impact of the intervention on reducing unnecessary antibiotic usage.

METHODS

A prospective intervention study was conducted on 4130 urine samples that were subjected to UA during March to May 2020. Results were analyzed in order to evaluate the effectiveness of newly implemented evidence-based criteria in predicting positive urine cultures. The intervention involved implementing evidence-based UA reflex criteria to ensure a high predictive value of the UA reflex parameters. Multivariable logistic regression was utilized to evaluate the effectiveness of these UA parameters in predicting positive urine cultures and to assess the impact of the new UA criteria on antibiotic usage.

RESULTS

A total of 4130 patient samples were included in the study; 60.1% (n = 2484) were from female patients and 39.9% (n = 1646) were from male patients. The total number of negative urine reflex samples was 3116, which accounted for 75.4% of the total UA reflex samples. In contrast, 24.6% of the urine reflex samples (n = 1014) returned positive UA results and were reflexed to urine culture. Among the urine samples that were cultured, 9% (n = 91) were negative urine cultures, while 91.0% (n = 923) were positive urine cultures. Chi-square analysis indicated highly statistically significant associations between the combination parameters of (≥5 white blood cells (WBCs) and positive nitrite) and positive urine cultures (Chi-square = 516.428, p < 0.001) and (≥5 WBCs and moderate or large esterase) and positive urine cultures (Chi-square = 503.387, p < 0.001). Additionally, Chi-square analysis indicated a highly statistically significant association between the combination parameters of (≥5 WBCs and ≥1 bacteria) and positive urine cultures (Chi-square = 434.806, p < 0.001). The statistical analysis showed that the implementation of evidence-based UA reflex criteria significantly decreased the number of urine cultures performed and potentially decreased the number of patients inappropriately treated with antibiotics from 45.1% to 9%.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, ≥5 WBCs and positive nitrite yielded the highest positive predictive value of 98.00% and showed a highly significant association with positive urine cultures. It was observed that the new UA reflex criteria are highly effective in predicting positive urine cultures, thus potentially resulting in the reduction of unnecessary antibiotic usage.

How to measure hospital antibiotic consumption: comparison of two methods from data surveillance in France

Background

Antibiotic use (ABU) surveillance in healthcare facilities (HCFs) is essential to guide stewardship. Two methods are recommended: antibiotic consumption (ABC), expressed as the number of DDD/1000 patient-days; and prevalence of antibiotic prescription (ABP) measured through point prevalence surveys. However, no evidence is provided about whether they lead to similar conclusions.

Objectives

To compare ABC and ABP regarding HCF ranking and their ability to identify outliers.

Methods

The comparison was made using 2012 national databases from the antibiotic surveillance network and prevalence study. HCF rankings according to each method were compared with Spearman’s correlation coefficient. Analyses included the ABU from entire HCFs as well as according to type, clinical ward and by antibiotic class and specific molecule.

Results

A total of 1076 HCFs were included. HCF rankings were strongly correlated in the whole cohort. The correlation was stronger for HCFs with a higher number of beds or with a low or moderate proportion of acute care beds. ABU correlation between ABC or ABP was globally moderate or weak in specific wards. Furthermore, the two methods did not identify the same outliers, whichever HCF characteristics were analysed. Correlation between HCF ranking varied according to the antibiotic class.

Conclusions

Both methods ranked HCFs similarly overall according to ABC or ABP; however, major differences were observed in ranking of clinical wards, antibiotic classes and detection of outliers. ABC and ABP are two markers of ABU that could be used as two complementary approaches to identify targets for improvement.

Why do hospital prescribers continue antibiotics when it is safe to stop? Results of a choice experiment survey

BACKGROUND

Deciding whether to discontinue antibiotics at early review is a cornerstone of hospital antimicrobial stewardship practice worldwide. In England, this approach is described in government guidance ('Start Smart then Focus'). However, < 10% of hospital antibiotic prescriptions are discontinued at review, despite evidence that 20-30% could be discontinued safely. We aimed to quantify the relative importance of factors influencing prescriber decision-making at review.

METHODS

We conducted an online choice experiment, a survey method to elicit preferences. Acute/general hospital prescribers in England were asked if they would continue or discontinue antibiotic treatment in 15 hypothetical scenarios. Scenarios were described according to six attributes, including patients' presenting symptoms and whether discontinuation would conflict with local prescribing guidelines. Respondents' choices were analysed using conditional logistic regression.

RESULTS

One hundred respondents completed the survey. Respondents were more likely to continue antibiotics when discontinuation would 'strongly conflict' with local guidelines (average marginal effect (AME) on the probability of continuing + 0.194 (p < 0.001)), when presenting symptoms more clearly indicated antibiotics (AME of urinary tract infection symptoms + 0.173 (p < 0.001) versus unclear symptoms) and when patients had severe frailty/comorbidities (AME = + 0.101 (p < 0.001)). Respondents were less likely to continue antibiotics when under no external pressure to continue (AME = - 0.101 (p < 0.001)). Decisions were also influenced by the risks to patient health of continuing/discontinuing antibiotic treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Guidelines that conflict with antibiotic discontinuation (e.g. pre-specify fixed durations) may discourage safe discontinuation at review. In contrast, guidelines conditional on patient factors/treatment response could help hospital prescribers discontinue antibiotics if diagnostic information suggesting they are no longer needed is available.

Antimicrobial stewardship: an evaluation of structure and process and their association with antimicrobial prescribing in NHS hospitals in England

BACKGROUND

Rigorous antimicrobial stewardship programmes (ASPs) are an essential strategy against antimicrobial resistance.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate and score ASPs in acute English NHS hospitals and determine association of ASP scores with antimicrobial prescribing.

METHODS

ASP structure and process were evaluated through an online survey in 148/152 acute hospitals in 2017. Scores were assigned to quality indicators based on resource- and labour-intensiveness, and their association with total and modified WHO-categorized 'Access', 'Watch' and 'Reserve' (AwaRe) prescribing was analysed.

RESULTS

The survey response rate was 97% with 78% of trusts submitting antimicrobial prescribing data. Over 80% of ASPs contained stewardship teams, policies and access to outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy, whilst less than 50% scored well for leadership or funding. High process performance was observed for antimicrobial pre-authorization, prescribing review and feedback, restricted susceptibility reporting, antimicrobial consumption monitoring, adherence to guidelines and junior doctor training. Low process attainment included education of senior prescribers and lack of resistance surveillance data distribution. Between 2016 and 2017, there was no difference in total trust prescribing (P = 0.117) although carbapenem prescribing fell (incidence rate ratio = 0.93, 95% CI 0.88-0.98) in non-teaching hospitals; 'Watch' prescribing also increased for specialist hospitals (OR = 1.10, 95% CI 1.01-1.20), as did 'Reserve' category prescribing in teaching (OR = 1.58, 95% CI 1.23-3.02) and specialist hospitals (OR = 3.09, 95% CI 2.02-4.74). A high process score was associated with lower 'Reserve' prescribing (OR = 0.82, 95% CI 0.67-1.01).

CONCLUSIONS

All responding trusts had established ASPs. The association of a scoring system with total and 'AWaRe' prescribing to assess effectiveness of ASPs merits further study.

Impact of antimicrobial stewardship fee on prescribing for Japanese pediatric patients with upper respiratory infections

BACKGROUND

In 2018, the Japanese medical reimbursement system was revised to introduce a fee for the implementation of an antimicrobial stewardship (AS) fee for pediatric patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate physicians' prescription behavior following this revision.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective observational study from January 1, 2017 to September 30, 2018 of pediatric (< 15 years) outpatients with upper respiratory tract infections (URIs). To assess the pattern of antibiotic prescription for the treatment of pediatric URIs before and after the introduction of the AS fee, we extracted data on pediatric URIs, diagnosed during the study period. Patients were divided based on whether medical facilities claimed AS fees. We defined antibiotic use as the number of antibiotics prescribed, and evaluated the proportion of each class to the total number of antibiotics prescribed. We also recorded the number of medical facilities that each patient visited during the study period.

RESULTS

The frequency of antibiotic prescription decreased after AS fee implementation, regardless of whether the facility claimed the AS fee, but tended to be lower in facilities that claimed the fee. Additionally, the frequency of antibiotic prescription decreased in all age groups. Despite the reduced frequency of antibiotic prescription, consultation behavior did not change.

CONCLUSIONS

The AS fee system, which compensates physicians for limiting antibiotic prescriptions, helped to reduce unnecessary antibiotic prescription and is thus a potentially effective measure against antimicrobial resistance.

Development of a hospital deprescribing implementation framework: A focus group study with geriatricians and pharmacists

Background

over 50% of older people in hospital are prescribed a pre-admission medicine that is potentially inappropriate; however, deprescribing by geriatricians and pharmacists is limited. This study aimed to characterise geriatricians’ and pharmacists’ barriers and enablers to deprescribing in hospital. It also intended to develop a framework of intervention components to facilitate implementation of hospital deprescribing.

Methods

fifty-four geriatricians and pharmacists representing four UK hospitals attended eight focus groups. We designed a topic guide to invite discussions about barriers and enablers to deprescribing. After thematic analysis, themes were mapped to the theoretical domains framework (TDF), enabling prioritisation of domains for behaviour change. We then identified evidence-based intervention components for changing behaviour within prioritised TDF domains.

Results

geriatricians and pharmacists described several deprescribing enablers in the hospital setting including alignment with their role and generalist knowledge, and routine patient monitoring. Five prioritised TDF domains represent the key barriers and enabler: patient and caregiver attachment to medication (social influence); perceptions that deprescribing is riskier than continuing to prescribe (beliefs about consequences); pharmacists’ working patterns limiting capacity to support deprescribing (environmental context and resources); deprescribing being a low hospital priority (goals) and incentives to deprescribe (reinforcement). Prioritised TDF domains aligned with 44 evidence-based intervention components to address the barriers and enabler to hospital deprescribing.

Conclusion

the behavioural determinants and their associated intervention components provide a hospital deprescribing implementation framework (hDIF). Intervention components should be selected from the hDIF to provide a theory and evidence-based intervention tailored to hospital contexts.

Adaptation and implementation of the ARK (Antibiotic Review Kit) intervention to safely and substantially reduce antibiotic use in hospitals: a feasibility study

BACKGROUND

Antimicrobial stewardship initiatives in secondary care depend on clinicians undertaking antibiotic prescription reviews but decisions to limit antibiotic treatment at review are complex.

AIM

To assess the feasibility and acceptability of implementing ARK (Antibiotic Review Kit), a behaviour change intervention made up of four components (brief online tool, prescribing decision aid, regular data collection and feedback process, and patient leaflet) to support stopping antibiotic treatment when it is safe to do so among hospitalized patients; before definitive evaluation through a stepped-wedge cluster-randomized controlled trial.

METHODS

Acceptability of the different intervention elements was assessed for a period of 12 weeks by uptake of the online tool, adoption of the decision aid into prescribing practice, and rates of decisions to stop antibiotics at review (assessed through repeated point-prevalence surveys). Patient perceptions of the information leaflet were assessed through a brief questionnaire.

FINDINGS

All elements of the intervention were successfully introduced into practice. A total of 132 staff encompassing a broad range of prescribers and non-prescribers completed the online tool (19.4 per 100 acute beds), including 97% (32/33) of the pre-specified essential clinical staff. Among 588 prescription charts evaluated in seven point-prevalence surveys over the 12-week implementation period, 82% overall (76-90% at each survey) used the decision aid. The median antibiotic stop rate post implementation was 36% (range: 29-40% at each survey) compared with 9% pre implementation (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

ARK provides a feasible and acceptable mechanism to support stopping antibiotics safely at post-prescription reviews in an acute hospital setting.

Antibiotic Review Kit for Hospitals (ARK-Hospital): study protocol for a stepped-wedge cluster-randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

To ensure patients continue to get early access to antibiotics at admission, while also safely reducing antibiotic use in hospitals, one needs to target the continued need for antibiotics as more diagnostic information becomes available. UK Department of Health guidance promotes an initiative called 'Start Smart then Focus': early effective antibiotics followed by active 'review and revision' 24-72 h later. However in 2017, < 10% of antibiotic prescriptions were discontinued at review, despite studies suggesting that 20-30% of prescriptions could be stopped safely.

METHODS/DESIGN

Antibiotic Review Kit for Hospitals (ARK-Hospital) is a complex 'review and revise' behavioural intervention targeting healthcare professionals involved in antibiotic prescribing or administration in inpatients admitted to acute/general medicine (the largest consumers of non-prophylactic antibiotics in hospitals). The primary study objective is to evaluate whether ARK-Hospital can safely reduce the total antibiotic burden in acute/general medical inpatients by at least 15%. The primary hypotheses are therefore that the introduction of the behavioural intervention will be non-inferior in terms of 30-day mortality post-admission (relative margin 5%) for an acute/general medical inpatient, and superior in terms of defined daily doses of antibiotics per acute/general medical admission (co-primary outcomes). The unit of observation is a hospital organisation, a single hospital or group of hospitals organised with one executive board and governance framework (National Health Service trusts in England; health boards in Northern Ireland, Wales and Scotland). The study comprises a feasibility study in one organisation (phase I), an internal pilot trial in three organisations (phase II) and a cluster (organisation)-randomised stepped-wedge trial (phase III) targeting a minimum of 36 organisations in total. Randomisation will occur over 18 months from November 2017 with a further 12 months follow-up to assess sustainability. The behavioural intervention will be delivered to healthcare professionals involved in antibiotic prescribing or administration in adult inpatients admitted to acute/general medicine. Outcomes will be assessed in adult inpatients admitted to acute/general medicine, collected through routine electronic health records in all patients.

DISCUSSION

ARK-Hospital aims to provide a feasible, sustainable and generalisable mechanism for increasing antibiotic stopping in patients who no longer need to receive them at 'review and revise'.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN Current Controlled Trials, ISRCTN12674243 . Registered on 10 April 2017.

Shared Goals, Different Barriers: A Qualitative Study of UK Veterinarians' and Farmers' Beliefs About Antimicrobial Resistance and Stewardship

Although much research has investigated the drivers of inappropriate antimicrobial prescribing in human medicine, equivalent research in veterinary medicine is in its infancy. This qualitative study used a critical incident approach to explore farm veterinarians' (vets) and farmers' beliefs about antimicrobial use and antimicrobial stewardship. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 13 vets and 12 farmers in the UK, who worked mostly with beef cattle, dairy cattle and sheep, but a minority also worked with pigs or poultry. An inductive thematic analysis was conducted to explore how vets and farmers understood their responsibilities toward stewardship and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and to identify key similarities and differences between the professions. The analysis generated four themes: "A shared conflict between ideals and behaviour," "Barriers to stewardship: the vets' perspective," "Barriers to stewardship: the farmers' perspective," and "A shared ambivalence: ownership vs. other-blaming." Vets and farmers demonstrated good understanding of stewardship but their treatment decisions are not always aligned to stewardship principles. Various barriers to improving antimicrobial stewardship were discussed by vets and farmers, but they placed differing emphasis on specific barriers. Faced with these barriers and an awareness that antimicrobial usage is not always aligned to stewardship principles, vets and farmers expressed frustration and a sense of ambivalence toward stewardship, and also engaged in other-blaming for the problem of AMR. In conclusion, vets and farmers in this study seem motivated to be antimicrobial stewards but feel challenged by the day-to-day reality of their jobs; they experience ambivalence toward their responsibilities for AMR, which may negatively impact their motivation to always act as antimicrobial stewards. Successfully tackling AMR will require change at the individual-, group-, and societal-level. Future interventions to improve antimicrobial usage in livestock farming could be situated within a social ecological framework, where other-blaming between professions is seen as a result of the interplay between psychological and contextual factors. Other-blaming could be reduced using a social identity approach; a common ingroup identity could be created by encouraging vets and farmers to focus on their common goal, namely a shared desire to promote animal welfare through optimal antimicrobial stewardship.