Monitoring microbial growth on a microfluidic lab-on-chip with electrochemical impedance spectroscopic technique

A continuous rise in the wastes from industrial effluents, bio-waste, and pharmaceuticals has deteriorated surface water and drinking water sources. Standard laboratory tests of total coliform are time-consuming and logistically inefficient for field data generation. Better and portable sensing technologies are needed. This paper reports an electrical impedance spectroscopic technique incorporated in a micro-fluidic chip with interdigitated microelectrodes to monitor the growth of microbial cells. Lag, log, and stationary phases of Escherichia coli cell growth with an integrated electrode are successfully detected, for samples of reverse osmosis water, standard treated tap water, and recycled water respectively. The results indicate that reverse osmosis water has a higher probability of contamination with bacterial pathogens compared to the other two types of water samples when subjected to the same amount of added nutrients. The statistical analysis shows a possible single detection range with higher-order regression, and repeat use of a single chip with the electrode was found to be within an acceptable limit. The interdigitated electrodes exposed to in-situ cell growth conditions and repeated electrical measurements have shown a promise for possible periodic or continuous monitoring. The paper further identifies several complimentary analysis methodologies that are robust towards phase noise in the measured impedance and are suited particularly for early-stage detection of bacterial contamination. The cell adhesion tendencies over the microelectrode due to the electric field need to be further analyzed.

Detection of Listeria monocytogenes and the toxin listeriolysin O in food

Listeria monocytogenes is an emerging bacterial foodborne pathogen responsible for listeriosis, an illness characterized by meningitis, encephalitis, and septicaemia. Less commonly, infection can result in cutaneous lesions and flu-like symptoms. In pregnant women, the pathogen can cause bacteraemia, and stillbirth or premature birth of the fetus. The mortality rate for those contracting listeriosis is approximately 20%. Currently, the United States has a zero tolerance policy regarding the presence of L. monocytogenes in food, while Canada allows only 100 cfu/g of food. As such, it is essential to be able to detect the pathogen in low numbers in food samples. One of the best ways to detect and confirm the pathogen is through the detection of one of the virulence factors, listeriolysin O (LLO) produced by the microorganism. The LLO-encoding gene (hlyA) is present only in virulent strains of the species and is required for virulence. LLO is a secreted protein toxin that can be detected easily with the use of blood agar or haemolysis assays and it is well characterized and understood. This paper focuses on some of the common methods used to detect the pathogen and the LLO toxin in food products and comments on some of the potential uses and drawbacks for the food industry.

Methods for the isolation and identification of Listeria spp. and Listeria monocytogenes: a review

Listeria monocytogenes is an important food-borne pathogen and is widely tested for in food, environmental and clinical samples. Identification traditionally involved culture methods based on selective enrichment and plating followed by the characterization of Listeria spp. based on colony morphology, sugar fermentation and haemolytic properties. These methods are the gold standard; but they are lengthy and may not be suitable for testing of foods with short shelf lives. As a result more rapid tests were developed based on antibodies (ELISA) or molecular techniques (PCR or DNA hybridization). While these tests possess equal sensitivity, they are rapid and allow testing to be completed within 48 h. More recently, molecular methods were developed that target RNA rather than DNA, such as RT-PCR, real time PCR or nucleic acid based sequence amplification (NASBA). These tests not only provide a measure of cell viability but they can also be used for quantitative analysis. In addition, a variety of tests are available for sub-species characterization, which are particularly useful in epidemiological investigations. Early typing methods differentiated isolates based on phenotypic markers, such as multilocus enzyme electrophoresis, phage typing and serotyping. These phenotypic typing methods are being replaced by molecular tests, which reflect genetic relationships between isolates and are more accurate. These new methods are currently mainly used in research but their considerable potential for routine testing in the future cannot be overlooked.