Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy for High-Risk, Resectable Malignancies: Scientific Rationale and Clinical Challenges

Peripheral CD8+PD-1+ T cells as novel biomarker for neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in humanized mice of non-small cell lung cancer

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy has shown promising clinical activity in the treatment of early non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, further clarification of the specific mechanism and identification of biomarkers are imperative prior to implementing it as a daily practice. The study investigated the reprogramming of T cells in both tumor and peripheral blood following neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in a preclinical NSCLC mouse model engrafted with a human immune system. Samples were also collected from 21 NSCLC patients (Stage IA-IIIB) who received neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy, and the dynamics of potential biomarkers within these samples were measured and further subjected to correlation analysis with prognosis. Further, we initially investigated the sources of the potential biomarkers. We observed in the humanized mouse model, neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy could prevent postoperative recurrence and metastasis by increasing the frequency and cytotoxicity of CD8+ T cells in both peripheral blood (p < 0.001) and tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) (p < 0.001). The kinetics of peripheral CD8+PD-1+ T cells reflected the changes in the TIME and pathological responses, ultimately predicting survival outcome of mice. In the clinical cohort, patients exhibiting an increase in these T cells post-treatment had a higher rate of complete or major pathological response (p < 0.05) and increased immune infiltration (p = 0.0012, r = 0.792). We identified these T cells originating from tumor draining lymph nodes and subsequently entering the TIME. In conclusion, the kinetics of peripheral CD8+PD-1+ T cells can serve as a predictor for changes in TIME and optimal timing for surgery, ultimately reflecting the outcomes of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in both preclinical and clinical setting.

The Immune Landscape of Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma: Current Advances and Perspectives

Pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas (PPGLs) are rare neuroendocrine tumors derived from neural crest cells from adrenal medullary chromaffin tissues and extra-adrenal paraganglia, respectively. Although the current treatment for PPGLs is surgery, optimal treatment options for advanced and metastatic cases have been limited. Hence, understanding the role of the immune system in PPGL tumorigenesis can provide essential knowledge for the development of better therapeutic and tumor management strategies, especially for those with advanced and metastatic PPGLs. The first part of this review outlines the fundamental principles of the immune system and tumor microenvironment, and their role in cancer immunoediting, particularly emphasizing PPGLs. We focus on how the unique pathophysiology of PPGLs, such as their high molecular, biochemical, and imaging heterogeneity and production of several oncometabolites, creates a tumor-specific microenvironment and immunologically "cold" tumors. Thereafter, we discuss recently published studies related to the reclustering of PPGLs based on their immune signature. The second part of this review discusses future perspectives in PPGL management, including immunodiagnostic and promising immunotherapeutic approaches for converting "cold" tumors into immunologically active or "hot" tumors known for their better immunotherapy response and patient outcomes. Special emphasis is placed on potent immune-related imaging strategies and immune signatures that could be used for the reclassification, prognostication, and management of these tumors to improve patient care and prognosis. Furthermore, we introduce currently available immunotherapies and their possible combinations with other available therapies as an emerging treatment for PPGLs that targets hostile tumor environments.

Preoperative-postoperative immunotherapy as treatment of borderline resectable and oligoprogressive stage III B-D and IV melanoma

INTRODUCTION

Perioperative therapy has gained significant importance in patients with advanced melanoma. Currently, there is little data on the routine use of preoperative immunotherapy in metastatic melanoma outside clinical trials. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of preoperative treatment in patients with borderline resectable stage III or IV melanoma as well as in oligoprogressing stage IV cases; the secondary aim is to describe the safety of surgery after immunotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Since 1/Jan/2016 seventeen patients were treated with curative intent neoadjuvant immunotherapy, surgery, and adjuvant immunotherapy, while nineteen patients were operated due to oligoprogression while treted with immunotherapy. Survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and association between variables was tested using the chi-squared test.

RESULTS

R0 resection was achieved in 76.5 % of cases after neoadjuvant immunotherapy. 24 % of patients achieved objective RECIST response and 35 % complete or major pathological response. At the median follow-up time of 51.4 months, 64.7 % of patients were free of PD after perioperative treatment, while 3-year RFS and OS rates were 68 % and 80.9 %, respectively. R0 resection was achieved in 73.7 % of oligo-progressing nodules. The median time to PD on immunotherapy after the first oligoprogression was 10.3 months. Immunotherapy did not result in any unexpected surgical complications. No patient died during preoperative treatment due to immunotherapy toxicity or disease progression.

CONCLUSIONS

We confirmed treatment safety and long-term disease control after perioperative immunotherapy. Patients with borderline resectable melanoma should be referred to reference centers using neoadjuvant immunotherapy.

Enhanced Complement Expression in the Tumor Microenvironment Following Neoadjuvant Therapy: Implications for Immunomodulation and Survival in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

Background

Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) is increasingly being used for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) treatment. However, its specific effects on carcinoma cells and the tumor microenvironment (TME) are not fully understood. This study aims to investigate how NAT differentially impacts PDAC's carcinoma cells and TME.

Methods

Spatial transcriptomics was used to compare gene expression profiles in carcinoma cells and the TME between 23 NAT-treated and 13 NAT-naïve PDAC patients, correlating with their clinicopathologic features. Analysis of an online single-nucleus RNA sequencing (snRNA-seq) dataset was performed for validation of the specific cell types responsible for NAT-induced gene expression alterations.

Results

NAT not only induces apoptosis and inhibits proliferation in carcinoma cells but also significantly remodels the TME. Notably, NAT induces a coordinated upregulation of multiple key complement genes (C3, C1S, C1R, C4B and C7) in the TME, making the complement pathway one of the most significantly affected pathways by NAT. Patients with higher TME complement expression following NAT exhibit improved overall survival. These patients also exhibit increased immunomodulatory and neurotrophic cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs); more CD4+ T cells, monocytes, and mast cells; and reduced immune exhaustion gene expression. snRNA-seq analysis demonstrates C3 complement was specifically upregulated in CAFs but not in other stroma cell types.

Conclusions

NAT can enhance complement production and signaling within the TME, which is associated with reduced immunosuppression in PDAC. These findings suggest that local complement dynamics could serve as a novel biomarker for prognosis, evaluating treatment response and resistance, and guiding therapeutic strategies in NAT-treated PDAC patients.

Rapidly Evolving Pre- and Post-surgical Systemic Treatment of Melanoma

With the development of effective BRAF-targeted and immune-checkpoint immunotherapies for metastatic melanoma, clinical trials are moving these treatments into earlier adjuvant and perioperative settings. BRAF-targeted therapy is a standard of care in resected stage III-IV melanoma, while anti-programmed death-1 (PD1) immunotherapy is now a standard of care option in resected stage IIB through IV disease. With both modalities, recurrence-free survival and distant-metastasis-free survival are improved by a relative 35-50%, yet no improvement in overall survival has been demonstrated. Neoadjuvant anti-PD1 therapy improves event-free survival by approximately an absolute 23%, although improvements in overall survival have yet to be demonstrated. Understanding which patients are most likely to recur and which are most likely to benefit from treatment is now the highest priority question in the field. Biomarker analyses, such as gene expression profiling of the primary lesion and circulating DNA, are preliminarily exciting as potential biomarkers, though each has drawbacks. As in the setting of metastatic disease, markers that inform positive outcomes include interferon-γ gene expression, PD-L1, and high tumor mutational burden, while negative predictors of outcome include circulating factors such as lactate dehydrogenase, interleukin-8, and C-reactive protein. Integrating and validating these markers into clinically relevant models is thus a high priority. Melanoma therapeutics continues to advance with combination adjuvant approaches now investigating anti-PD1 with lymphocyte activation gene 3 (LAG3), T-cell immunoreceptor with Ig and ITIM domains (TIGIT), and individualized neoantigen therapies. How this progress will be integrated into the management of a unique patient to reduce recurrence, limit toxicity, and avoid over-treatment will dominate clinical research and patient care over the next decade.

Current usage of pembrolizumab in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC)

INTRODUCTION

The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway has changed the landscape in the treatment of triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). The ICI pembrolizumab in combination with chemotherapy now forms a standard of care for the treatment of advanced PD-L1 positive TNBC and as part of neoadjuvant therapy for high-risk early-stage disease. Evidence in this space is rapidly advancing.

AREAS COVERED

This review aims to highlight the evolving role of immunotherapy in TNBC management and to discuss current challenges. The studies in this review were searched from PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov.

EXPERT OPINION

The KEYNOTE-522 trial demonstrated that the addition of peri-operative pembrolizumab to neoadjuvant chemotherapy improves patient outcomes in early-stage TNBC. However, critical questions remain including how to select which patients truly gain benefit from the addition of pembrolizumab; the optimal duration of therapy, and the optimal adjuvant therapy depending on pathologic response.

Concise review: The heterogenous roles of BATF3 in cancer oncogenesis and dendritic cells and T cells differentiation and function considering the importance of BATF3-dependent dendritic cells

The transcription factor, known as basic leucine zipper ATF-like 3 (BATF3), is a crucial contributor to the development of conventional type 1 dendritic cells (cDC1), which is definitely required for priming CD8 + T cell-mediated immunity against intracellular pathogens and malignancies. In this respect, BATF3-dependent cDC1 can bring about immunological tolerance, an autoimmune response, graft immunity, and defense against infectious agents such as viruses, microbes, parasites, and fungi. Moreover, the important function of cDC1 in stimulating CD8 + T cells creates an excellent opportunity to develop a highly effective target for vaccination against intracellular pathogens and diseases. BATF3 has been clarified to control the development of CD8α+ and CD103+ DCs. The presence of BATF3-dependent cDC1 in the tumor microenvironment (TME) reinforces immunosurveillance and improves immunotherapy approaches, which can be beneficial for cancer immunotherapy. Additionally, BATF3 acts as a transcriptional inhibitor of Treg development by decreasing the expression of the transcription factor FOXP3. However, when overexpressed in CD8 + T cells, it can enhance their survival and facilitate their transition to a memory state. BATF3 induces Th9 cell differentiation by binding to the IL-9 promoter through a BATF3/IRF4 complex. One of the latest research findings is the oncogenic function of BATF3, which has been approved and illustrated in several biological processes of proliferation and invasion.

Polygenic risk score for ulcerative colitis predicts immune checkpoint inhibitor-mediated colitis

Immune checkpoint inhibitor-mediated colitis (IMC) is a common adverse event of treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). We hypothesize that genetic susceptibility to Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) predisposes to IMC. In this study, we first develop a polygenic risk scores for CD (PRSCD) and UC (PRSUC) in cancer-free individuals and then test these PRSs on IMC in a cohort of 1316 patients with ICI-treated non-small cell lung cancer and perform a replication in 873 ICI-treated pan-cancer patients. In a meta-analysis, the PRSUC predicts all-grade IMC (ORmeta=1.35 per standard deviation [SD], 95% CI = 1.12-1.64, P = 2×10-03) and severe IMC (ORmeta=1.49 per SD, 95% CI = 1.18-1.88, P = 9×10-04). PRSCD is not associated with IMC. Furthermore, PRSUC predicts severe IMC among patients treated with combination ICIs (ORmeta=2.20 per SD, 95% CI = 1.07-4.53, P = 0.03). Overall, PRSUC can identify patients receiving ICI at risk of developing IMC and may be useful to monitor patients and improve patient outcomes.

Liposome-based nanomedicine for immune checkpoint blocking therapy and combinatory cancer therapy

The discovery of immune checkpoint (IC) has led to a wave of leap forward in cancer immunotherapy that represents probably the most promising strategy for cancer therapy. However, the clinical use of immune checkpoint block (ICB) therapy is limited by response rates and side effects. A strategy that addresses the limitations of ICB therapies through combination therapies, using nanocarriers as mediators, has been mentioned in numerous research papers. Liposomes have been probably one of the most extensively used nanocarriers for clinical applications, with broad drug delivery and high safety. A timely review on this hot subject of research, i.e., the application of liposomes for ICB, is thus highly desirable for both fundamental and clinical translatable studies, but remains, to our knowledge, unexplored so far. For this purpose, this review is composed to address the dilemma of ICB therapy and the reasons for this dilemma. We later describe how other cancer treatments have broken this dilemma. Finally, we focus on the role of liposomes in various combinatory cancer therapy. This review is believed to serve as a guidance for the rational design and development of liposome for immunotherapy with enhanced therapeutic efficiency.

Personalised Medicine and the Potential Role of Electrospinning for Targeted Immunotherapeutics in Head and Neck Cancer

Advanced head and neck cancer (HNC) is functionally and aesthetically destructive, and despite significant advances in therapy, overall survival is poor, financial toxicity is high, and treatment commonly exacerbates tissue damage. Although response and durability concerns remain, antibody-based immunotherapies have heralded a paradigm shift in systemic treatment. To overcome limitations associated with antibody-based immunotherapies, exploration into de novo and repurposed small molecule immunotherapies is expanding at a rapid rate. Small molecule immunotherapies also have the capacity for chelation to biodegradable, bioadherent, electrospun scaffolds. This article focuses on the novel concept of targeted, sustained release immunotherapies and their potential to improve outcomes in poorly accessible and risk for positive margin HNC cases.

A locally advanced colon cancer patient with Muir-Torre syndrome obtains durable response to neoadjuvant and adjuvant immunotherapy

INTRODUCTION

Muir-Torre syndrome, presenting with cutaneous tumors and visceral malignancies, is a variant of Lynch syndrome. The development of immune checkpoint inhibitors provided novel effective treatment options for metastatic colorectal cancer patients with microsatellite instability and deficient mismatch repair. However, the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings for patients with locally advanced colorectal cancer remains undefined because of limited follow-ups in current studies.

CASE PRESENTATION

In the present study, we reported a 33-year-old Muri-Torre syndrome patient with stage ⅢC (c.T4N2M0) colorectal cancer and keratoacanthoma. Microsatellite instability / deficient mismatch repair, high tumor mutation burden, and MSH2 germline mutation were identified by next-generation sequencing. Pembrolizumab monotherapy was used as neoadjuvant treatment and the patient achieved a major pathological response. After surgical resection, pembrolizumab was continuously used in an adjuvant setting for 12 months. The patient remained disease-free with a durable disease-free survival for 44 months. To our knowledge, this is the first and longest follow-up study reporting pembrolizumab as a single-agent neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced colon cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

The results demonstrate promising performance in neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings. Further studies are needed to confirm its potential usefulness as an outcome measure in clinical practice.

Tackling the immunotherapy conundrum: advances and challenges for operable non-small-cell lung cancer treatment

Lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) represents the majority of lung cancer cases, and its standard treatment is primarily surgery. Nonetheless, this type of cancer exhibits an important rate of tumor recurrence. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have demonstrated significant survival benefits in many cancers, especially in early-stage NSCLC. This review considers the latest CheckMate816, IMpower010 and KEYNOTE-091 trials that led to US FDA approvals. The new wave of resectable NSCLC trial results are also summarized. Finally, the latest challenges for these treatment modalities, such as the choice between neoadjuvant and adjuvant use, the accurate identification of biomarkers and the presence of driver mutations such as EGFR, are discussed.

Activatable Mn2+-Armed nanoagonist augments antitumor immunity in colorectal cancer: A NIR-II Photonic neoadjuvant paradigm

Postoperative recurrence frequently occurs in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) due to residual microtumors and host cellular immune dysfunction, leading to major setbacks in clinical outcomes and CRC staging. As an increasingly prevalent therapeutic option for CRC patients, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy bears unmet challenges of limited tumor targeting and common side effects of gastrointestinal reaction and radiodermatitis. It is highly desirable to develop neoadjuvant treatment paradigms that impart both tumor-targeting accuracy and protection against recurrence of resectable CRC. Here we report a versatile photo-regulated nanoagonist of plasmonic gold blackbody (AuPB) with a polydopamine (PDA) coating carrying manganese ion (Mn2+) payloads (AuPB@PDA/Mn). When armed with second near-infrared (NIR-II) light, AuPB@PDA/Mn with broad-band localized surface plasmon resonance generates local hyperthermia and discharges Mn2+ ions, which evidently amplify the effects of immunogenic cell death in tumor cells and activate the cyclic GMP-AMP synthase/stimulator of interferon genes pathway in dendritic cells (DCs), hence potentiating the maturation of DC and the secretion of type I interferon in a synergistic way. Matured DCs undertake the task of tumor antigen presentation as the crosstalk to adaptive immunity. As such, the administration of AuPB@PDA/Mn coupled with NIR-II laser irradiation has eminently augmented the infiltration of CD8+ T cells as well as the development of memory CD8+ T cells in colorectal tumor models, substantiating enhanced immunomodulatory efficacy against primary and recurrent CRC. Our strategy highlights the potency of an integrated NIR-II photothermal and immunoregulatory modality by photo-activate delivery of Mn2+ ions, as a neoadjuvant paradigm for presurgical tumor debulking and against postoperative tumor recurrence.

The Current State of Neoadjuvant Therapy in Resectable Advanced Stage Melanoma

The advent of effective immunotherapy and targeted therapy has significantly improved outcomes in advanced-stage resectable melanoma. Currently, the mainstay of treatment of malignant melanoma is surgery followed by adjuvant systemic therapies. However, recent studies have shown a potential role for neoadjuvant therapy in the treatment of advanced-stage resectable melanoma. Mechanistically, neoadjuvant immunotherapy may yield a more robust response than adjuvant immunotherapy, as the primary tumor serves as an antigen in this setting rather than only micrometastatic disease after the index procedure. Additionally, targeted therapy has been shown to yield effective neoadjuvant cytoreduction, and oncolytic viruses may also increase the immunogenicity of primary tumors. Effective neoadjuvant therapy may serve to decrease tumor size and thus reduce the extent of required surgery and thus morbidity. It also allows for assessment of pathologic response, facilitating prognostication as well as tailoring future therapy. The current literature consistently supports that neoadjuvant therapy, even as little as one dose, is associated with improved outcomes and is well-tolerated. Some patients with a complete pathological response may even avoid surgery completely. These results challenge the current paradigm of a surgery-first approach and provide further evidence supporting neoadjuvant therapy in advanced-stage resectable melanoma. Further research into the optimal treatment schedule and dose timing is warranted, as is the continued investigation of novel therapies and combinations of therapies.

A systematic review of neoadjuvant and definitive immunotherapy in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) require multi-modality treatment. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are now standard of care in management of recurrent/metastatic HNSCC. However, its role in the definitive and neoadjuvant setting remains unclear.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted that included all articles investigating ICI in untreated locally advanced (LA) HNSCC. Data was extracted and summarised and rated for quality using the Cochrane risk of bias tool.

RESULTS

Of 1086 records, 29 met the final inclusion criteria. In both concurrent and neoadjuvant settings, the addition of ICI was safe and did not delay surgery or reduce chemoradiotherapy completion. In the concurrent setting, although ICI use demonstrates objective responses in all published trials, there has not yet been published data to with PFS or OS benefit. In the neoadjuvant setting, combination ICI resulted in superior major pathological response rates compared to ICI monotherapy without a significant increase adverse event profiles, but its value in improving survival is not clear. ICI efficacy appears to be affected by tumour characteristics, in particular PD-L1 combined positive score, HPV status and the tumour microenvironment.

CONCLUSIONS

There is significant heterogeneity of ICI use in untreated LA HNSCC with multiple definitive concurrent and neoadjuvant protocols used. Resultantly, conclusions regarding the survival benefits of adding ICI to standard-of-care regimens cannot be made. Further trials and translational studies are required to elucidate optimal ICI sequencing in the definitive setting as well as better define populations more suited for neoadjuvant protocols.

Fucosyltransferases Regulated by Fusobacterium Nucleatum and Act as Novel Biomarkers in Colon Adenocarcinoma

Purpose

Colon adenocarcinoma (COAD) is one of the leading causes of cancer-associated mortality worldwide. Fucosyltransferases (FUTs) are associated with numerous cancers. We aimed to investigate the functions of FUTs in COAD.

Patients and Methods

Transcriptomic and clinical data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) databases were used to analyze the expression and clinical relevance of FUTs in COAD. Real Time Quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR), Western blot, immunohistochemistry and ELISA were used to detect the relative RNA and protein expression levels. Colitis-associated cancer mice treated with Fusobacterium nucleatum were used to illustrate the effects of Fusobacterium nucleatum on FUTs and COAD. Luciferase reporting assay was used to investigate the binding of miRNA to mRNA.

Results

TCGA and GEO datasets showed abnormal expression of FUTs in COAD at transcript level. RT-qPCR, Western blot and immunohistochemistry showed increased expression of FUT1, POFUT1 and POFUT2 in COAD. COAD patients with a high expression of FUT1, FUT11, FUT13 (POFUT2) had a worse prognosis, while patients with a high expression of FUT2, FUT3, FUT6 had a better prognosis. FUT1 and POFUT2 could independently predict the prognosis of COAD patients. Functional analysis by CancerSEA database showed that FUT3, FUT6, FUT8, FUT12 (POFUT1) and FUT13 are associated with differentiation, apoptosis, invasion, quiescence, and hypoxia. FUTs are associated with the tumor microenvironment of COAD. FUT1 regulated by miR-939-3p inhibit the expression of MUC2. Fusobacterium nucleatum may affect the expression of FUTs by affecting their transcription factors and miRNA levels. Moreover, Fusobacterium nucleatum promotes COAD progression through the miR-939-3p/FUT1/MUC2 axis.

Conclusion

Fucosyltransferases play an important role and may be the mediator of Fusobacterium nucleatum promoting COAD progression.

Perioperative systemic therapies for non-small-cell lung cancer: Recent advances and future perspectives

The mainstay of treatment for early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is surgical resection. Traditionally, chemotherapy has been used perioperatively in locally extensive disease to improve the oncologic outcomes of surgery, with a 5-year absolute survival benefit of approximately 5%. In recent years, immunotherapy and molecular targeted therapy have shown excellent results in the treatment of locoregionally advanced and metastatic NSCLC, replacing chemotherapy as first-line treatment in certain cases. Consequently, researchers have been increasingly investigating the use of immunotherapy or targeted therapy in combination with surgery for the treatment of early-stage disease. This growing research interest has resulted in several published and ongoing studies of various size and design. In this mini review, we provide a succinct and up-to-date overview of recently published, phase 3 randomized clinical trials on adjuvant and neoadjuvant immunotherapy or targeted therapy for NSCLC. We subsequently discuss some important unresolved clinical issues, including the optimal duration of treatment, scheduling with respect to surgery, and potential combinations of different systemic therapies. Finally, we reference large, randomized, phase 3 studies that are currently in progress and may give answers to those and other clinical questions.

Role of immunotherapy in downsizing hepatocellular carcinoma prior to liver transplantation

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is an aggressive primary liver neoplasm that, according to tumor stage, can be treated with resection, transplantation, locoregional treatment options, or systemic therapy. Although interventions only in early-stage disease can offer complete tumor regression, systemic therapy in advanced disease can significantly prolong overall survival, according to published clinical trials. The emergence of immunotherapy in the field of cancer therapy has had a positive impact on patients with HCC, resulting in atezolizumab–bevacizumab currently being the first-line option for treatment of advanced HCC. In light of this, application of immunotherapy in the preoperative process could increase the number of patients fulfilling the criteria for liver transplantation (LT). Implementation of this approach is faced with challenges regarding the safety of immunotherapy and the possibly increased risk of rejection in the perioperative period. Case reports and clinical trials assessing the safety profile and effectiveness of neoadjuvant immunotherapy, highlight important aspects regarding this newly evolving approach to HCC management. More studies need to be conducted in order to reach a consensus regarding the optimal way to administer immunotherapy prior to LT. In this review, we summarize the role, safety profile and future considerations regarding the use of neoadjuvant immunotherapy prior to LT in patients with HCC.

Surgery-mediated tumor-promoting effects on the immune microenvironment

Surgical resection continues to be the mainstay treatment for solid cancers even though chemotherapy and immunotherapy have significantly improved patient overall survival and progression-free survival. Numerous studies have shown that surgery induces the dissemination of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and that the resultant inflammatory response promotes occult tumor growth and the metastatic process by forming a supportive tumor microenvironment (TME). Surgery-induced platelet activation is one of the initial responses to a wound and the formation of fibrin clots can provide the scaffold for recruited inflammatory cells. Activated platelets can also shield CTCs to protect them from blood shear forces and promote CTCs evasion of immune destruction. Similarly, neutrophils are recruited to the fibrin clot and enhance cancer metastatic dissemination and progression by forming neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs). Activated macrophages are also recruited to surgical sites to facilitate the metastatic spread. More importantly, the body's response to surgical insult results in the recruitment and expansion of immunosuppressive cell populations (i.e. myeloid-derived suppressor cells and regulatory T cells) and in the suppression of natural killer (NK) cells that contribute to postoperative cancer recurrence and metastasis. In this review, we seek to provide an overview of the pro-tumorigenic mechanisms resulting from surgery's impact on these cells in the TME. Further understanding of these events will allow for the development of perioperative therapeutic strategies to prevent surgery-associated metastasis.

Maximizing the value of phase III trials in immuno-oncology: A checklist from the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC)

The broad activity of agents blocking the programmed cell death protein 1 and its ligand (the PD-(L)1 axis) revolutionized oncology, offering long-term benefit to patients and even curative responses for tumors that were once associated with dismal prognosis. However, only a minority of patients experience durable clinical benefit with immune checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy in most disease settings. Spurred by preclinical and correlative studies to understand mechanisms of non-response to the PD-(L)1 antagonists and by combination studies in animal tumor models, many drug development programs were designed to combine anti-PD-(L)1 with a variety of approved and investigational chemotherapies, tumor-targeted therapies, antiangiogenic therapies, and other immunotherapies. Several immunotherapy combinations improved survival outcomes in a variety of indications including melanoma, lung, kidney, and liver cancer, among others. This immunotherapy renaissance, however, has led to many combinations being advanced to late-stage development without definitive predictive biomarkers, limited phase I and phase II data, or clinical trial designs that are not optimized for demonstrating the unique attributes of immune-related antitumor activity-for example, landmark progression-free survival and overall survival. The decision to activate a study at an individual site is investigator-driven, and generalized frameworks to evaluate the potential for phase III trials in immuno-oncology to yield positive data, particularly to increase the number of curative responses or otherwise advance the field have thus far been lacking. To assist in evaluating the potential value to patients and the immunotherapy field of phase III trials, the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) has developed a checklist for investigators, described in this manuscript. Although the checklist focuses on anti-PD-(L)1-based combinations, it may be applied to any regimen in which immune modulation is an important component of the antitumor effect.

A pathological complete response after nivolumab plus ipilimumab therapy for DNA mismatch repair‑deficient/microsatellite instability‑high metastatic colon cancer: A case report

The standard treatment for colorectal cancer has always been surgery and chemotherapy, which may be used in combination to treat patients. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have been a significant advancement in the standard treatment of metastatic, unresectable colorectal cancer with deficient mismatch repair. However, little information is available about their use in neoadjuvant and conversion settings with only a few case reports and only one phase 2 trial. The present study reports the case of a large, locally advanced right-sided metastatic deficient mismatch repair/microsatellite instability-high colon cancer, which showed a pathological complete response after combination treatment with nivolumab and ipilimumab. To the best of our knowledge, resected metastatic colon cancer with a pathological complete response after treatment using dual immune checkpoint inhibitors has not been previously reported. Overall, this case report suggests the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors before colorectal surgery.

Progress and pitfalls in the use of immunotherapy for patients with triple negative breast cancer

INTRODUCTION

Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an area of high unmet medical need in terms of new effective treatment strategies. Although breast cancer is traditionally considered a 'cold' tumor type, TNBC is the most appropriate subtype for immunotherapeutic strategies; this is due to the high level of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes, PD-L1 expression and tumor mutational burden relative to other breast cancer subtypes.

AREAS COVERED

This review examines the use of immunotherapeutic strategies in early and advanced TNBC. The paper summarizes data on novel promising immunomodulatory approaches that have been explored in early phase trials and discusses the pitfalls and limitations often encountered in clinical research.

EXPERT OPINION

PD-1-blockade is approved for stage II/III TNBC and for first-line treatment of PD-L1-positive TNBC patients with metastatic disease and should be considered standard of care. However, question marks and difficulties remain; these include the identification of predictive biomarkers to select patients who benefit from the addition of PD1-blockade and the balance between efficacy and long-term toxicity for an individual patient. Numerous treatment combinations and new immunotherapeutic strategies beyond PD1 blockade are being evaluated, thus reflecting a promising evolution of a more personalized approach, and extended clinical benefit in TNBC.

Neoadjuvant therapy for melanoma: new and evolving concepts

Effective systemic therapies, including targeted BRAF/MEK inhibition and immune checkpoint blockade, have significantly changed the treatment landscape for malignant melanoma. Specifically, there have been promising clinical trial findings associated with the use of neoadjuvant therapy for clinically node-positive and oligometastatic disease, conditions that have historically been managed with up-front surgical resection when possible. This review focuses on the burgeoning field of neoadjuvant therapy for melanoma. We review the rationale for this treatment approach, summarize completed and ongoing neoadjuvant clinical trials, and contextualize these findings within the growing body of knowledge about targeted and immune checkpoint therapy. Finally, we discuss future directions for neoadjuvant trials in melanoma, with particular focus on biomarker development, treatment effect modification, novel therapeutic regimens, and evolving surgical indications for regional and oligometastatic disease.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors in resectable gastroesophageal cancers - a review

Gastroesophageal cancers (GEC) have a poor survival rate of 20–30% at 5 years, often due to delayed presentations. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by surgery or peri-operative chemotherapy and surgery are widely used as the standard of care for patients with resectable GEC. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have improved survival in metastatic and recurrent GEC which led to their application in resectable GEC. Based on the pivotal CheckMate 577 study results, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved nivolumab for patients with completely resected high-risk esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer (GEJC). Several ongoing trials with many ICIs could potentially improve resectable GEC outcomes. This review explores the rationale for using ICIs in resectable GEC and discusses the significance of reported clinical trials. Finally, we will examine some ongoing clinical trials and the challenges as well as prospects of ICIs in resectable GEC.

Current status and future perspective of immune checkpoint inhibitors in colorectal cancer

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), as a subverter of immunotherapy in oncology, are changing all aspects of therapy for malignant tumors, especially their remarkable effects on melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). For colorectal cancer (CRC), only a small number of patients with high immunogenicity (microsatellite instability-high/mismatch-repair deficient (MSI-H/dMMR)) benefit greatly from ICIs treatment, and most CRC patients with low immunogenicity (microsatellite instability-low/mismatch-repair proficient (MSI-L/pMMR)) do not. Currently, numerous clinical trials are ongoing to improve CRC patients' response to ICIs immunotherapy through better patient selection and novel combination strategies. Thus, this review discusses the current status and latest progress of ICIs treatment in CRC. We expect that these studies can change the pattern of CRC immunotherapy in the future.

EGFR Status Assessment for Better Care of Early Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma: What Is Changing in the Daily Practice of Pathologists?

The recent emergence of novel neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant therapies for early stage (I-IIIA) non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), mainly tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) targeting EGFR mutations and immunotherapy or chemo-immunotherapy, has suddenly required the evaluation of biomarkers predictive of the efficacy of different treatments in these patients. Currently, the choice of one or another of these treatments mainly depends on the results of immunohistochemistry for PD-L1 and of the status of EGFR and ALK. This new development has led to the setup of different analyses for clinical and molecular pathology laboratories, which have had to rapidly integrate a number of new challenges into daily practice and to establish new organization for decision making. This review outlines the impact of the management of biological samples in laboratories and discusses perspectives for pathologists within the framework of EGFR TKIs in early stage NSCLC.

Immune Monitoring in Melanoma and Urothelial Cancer Patients Treated with Anti-PD-1 Immunotherapy and SBRT Discloses Tumor Specific Immune Signatures

Simple Summary

Currently available biomarkers for response to checkpoint inhibitors are incomplete and predominantly focus on tumor tissue analysis e.g., tumor mutational burden, programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression. Biomarkers in peripheral blood would allow a more dynamic monitoring and could offer a way for sequential adaptation of treatment strategy. We conducted an in-depth analysis of baseline and on-treatment systemic immune features in a cohort of stage III/IV melanoma and stage IV urothelial cancer (UC) patients treated with anti-programmed cell death-1 (anti-PD-1) therapy combined with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in a similar regimen/schedule. Baseline immunity was clearly different between these two cohorts, indicating a less active immune landscape in UC patients. This study also detected signatures of proliferation in the CD8⁺ T-cell compartment pre-treatment and early after anti-PD-1 initiation that were positively correlated with clinical outcome in both tumor types. In addition our data support the biological relevance of PD-1/PD-L1 expression on circulating immune cell subsets, especially in melanoma.

Abstract

(1) Background: Blockade of the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway has revolutionized the oncology field in the last decade. However, the proportion of patients experiencing a durable response is still limited. In the current study, we performed an extensive immune monitoring in patients with stage III/IV melanoma and stage IV UC who received anti-PD-1 immunotherapy with SBRT. (2) Methods: In total 145 blood samples from 38 patients, collected at fixed time points before and during treatment, were phenotyped via high-parameter flow cytometry, luminex assay and UPLC-MS/MS. (3) Results: Baseline systemic immunity in melanoma and UC patients was different with a more prominent myeloid compartment and a higher neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio in UC. Proliferation (Ki67⁺) of CD8⁺ T-cells and of the PD-1⁺/PD-L1⁺ CD8⁺ subset at baseline correlated with progression free survival in melanoma. In contrast a higher frequency of PD-1/PD-L1 expressing non-proliferating (Ki67⁻) CD8⁺ and CD4⁺ T-cells before treatment was associated with worse outcome in melanoma. In UC, the expansion of Ki67⁺ CD8⁺ T-cells and of the PD-L1⁺ subset relative to tumor burden correlated with clinical outcome. (4) Conclusion: This study reveals a clearly different immune landscape in melanoma and UC at baseline, which may impact immunotherapy response. Signatures of proliferation in the CD8⁺ T-cell compartment prior to and early after anti-PD-1 initiation were positively correlated with clinical outcome in both cohorts. PD-1/PD-L1 expression on circulating immune cell subsets seems of clinical relevance in the melanoma cohort.