Structural basis for recognition and repair of the 3'-phosphate by NExo, a base excision DNA repair nuclease from Neisseria meningitidis

Model of abasic site DNA cross-link repair; from the architecture of NEIL3 DNA binding domains to the X-structure model

Covalent DNA interstrand crosslinks are toxic DNA damage lesions that block the replication machinery that can cause a genomic instability. Ubiquitous abasic DNA sites are particularly susceptible to spontaneous cross-linking with a base from the opposite DNA strand. Detection of a crosslink induces the DNA helicase ubiquitination that recruits NEIL3, a DNA glycosylase responsible for the lesion removal. NEIL3 utilizes several zinc finger domains indispensable for its catalytic NEI domain repairing activity. They recruit NEIL3 to the repair site and bind the single-stranded DNA. However, the molecular mechanism underlying their roles in the repair process is unknown. Here, we report the structure of the tandem zinc-finger GRF domain of NEIL3 and reveal the molecular details of its interaction with DNA. Our biochemical data indicate the preferential binding of the GRF domain to the replication fork. In addition, we obtained a structure for the catalytic NEI domain in complex with the DNA reaction intermediate that allowed us to construct and validate a model for the interplay between the NEI and GRF domains in the recognition of an interstrand cross-link. Our results suggest a mechanism for recognition of the DNA replication X-structure by NEIL3, a key step in the interstrand cross-link repair.

The rate of formation and stability of abasic site interstrand crosslinks in the DNA duplex

DNA interstrand crosslinks (ICLs) strands pose an impenetrable barrier for DNA replication. Different ICLs are known to recruit distinct DNA repair pathways. NEIL3 glycosylase has been known to remove an abasic (Ap) site derived DNA crosslink (Ap-ICL). An Ap-ICL forms spontaneously from the Ap site with an adjacent adenine in the opposite strand. Lack of genetic models and a poor understanding of the fate of these lesions leads to many questions about the occurrence and the toxicity of Ap-ICL in cells. Here, we investigate the circumstances of Ap-ICL formation. With an array of different oligos, we have investigated the rates of formation, the yields, and the stability of Ap-ICL. Our findings point out how different bases in the vicinity of the Ap site change crosslink formation in vitro. We reveal that AT-rich rather than GC-rich regions in the surrounding Ap site lead to higher rates of Ap-ICL formation. Overall, our data reveal that Ap-ICL can be formed in virtually any DNA sequence context surrounding a hot spot of a 5'-Ap-dT pair, albeit with significantly different rates and yields. Based on Ap-ICL formation in vitro, we attempt to predict the number of Ap-ICLs in the cell.

APE1 distinguishes DNA substrates in exonucleolytic cleavage by induced space-filling

The exonuclease activity of Apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease 1 (APE1) is responsible for processing matched/mismatched terminus in various DNA repair pathways and for removing nucleoside analogs associated with drug resistance. To fill in the gap of structural basis for exonucleolytic cleavage, we determine the APE1-dsDNA complex structures displaying end-binding. As an exonuclease, APE1 does not show base preference but can distinguish dsDNAs with different structural features. Integration with assaying enzyme activity and binding affinity for a variety of substrates reveals for the first time that both endonucleolytic and exonucleolytic cleavage can be understood by an induced space-filling model. Binding dsDNA induces RM (Arg176 and Met269) bridge that defines a long and narrow product pocket for exquisite machinery of substrate selection. Our study paves the way to comprehend end-processing of dsDNA in the cell and the drug resistance relating to APE1.

Conformational changes of DNA repair glycosylase MutM triggered by DNA binding

Bacterial MutM is a DNA repair glycosylase removing DNA damage generated from oxidative stress and, therefore, preventing mutations and genomic instability. MutM belongs to the Fpg/Nei family of prokaryotic enzymes sharing structural and functional similarities with their eukaryotic counterparts, for example, NEIL1-NEIL3. Here, we present two crystal structures of MutM from pathogenic Neisseria meningitidis: a MutM holoenzyme and MutM bound to DNA. The free enzyme exists in an open conformation, while upon binding to DNA, both the enzyme and DNA undergo substantial structural changes and domain rearrangement. Our data show that not only NEI glycosylases but also the MutMs undergo dramatic conformational changes. Moreover, crystallographic data support the previously published observations that MutM enzymes are rather flexible and dynamic molecules.