Acute kidney injury is associated with subtle but quantifiable neurocognitive impairments

Association of acute kidney injury with the risk of cognitive impairment or dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Since previous studies have shown a paradoxical relationship between acute kidney injury (AKI) and risk of cognitive impairment, there is an urgent need for a meta-analysis to assess the relationship between AKI and risk of cognitive impairment or dementia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From database inception to October 2023, we searched PubMed, OVID (Medline), Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. This study examined AKI and cognitive impairment or dementia observational studies. Two authors independently assessed cohort and cross-sectional study quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and AHRQ Scale. They also used ROBINS-I to assess bias. The meta-analysis used fixed effects. Sensitivity analysis verified results stability. The funnel plot, Egger test, and Begg test determined publication bias in the results.

RESULTS

Seven studies with 423,876 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Patients with AKI were at higher risk of cognitive impairment or dementia compared to those who had not experienced AKI (OR = 1.87, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.77-1.98, I2=46.0%, p = 0.08). All subgroups showed a substantial connection between AKI and cognitive impairment. Compared to domestic research, the connection was stronger in overseas studies (OR = 2.18, 95% CI: 1.66-2.87). Both cognitive impairment and dementia outcomes showed a substantial connection between AKI and cognitive impairment, with OR values of 2.00 (95% CI: 1.44-2.76) and 2.04 (95% CI: 1.66-2.51).

CONCLUSIONS

We found that AKI significantly increases cognitive impairment or dementia risk. Thus, early interventions to delay cognitive impairment and prevent adverse outcomes in AKI patients are needed.

Harm! foul! How acute kidney injury SHReDDs patient futures

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Transition from acute kidney injury (AKI) to chronic kidney disease (CKD) is increasingly accepted. Less well recognized, but supported by very similar data, is development of disease of other organ systems after AKI. Awareness of other-organ sequelae of AKI may inform efforts to improve the care of patients after AKI.

RECENT FINDINGS

Stroke, hypertension, reproductive risk, dementia, and death (SHReDD) are sequelae, which occur with increased risk relative to that of non-AKI within 6 months-3 years after AKI diagnosis, and which are supported by preclinical/mechanistic study. Adjusted hazard ratios for these sequelae are strikingly similar to that of AKI-CKD, ranging from 1.2 to 3.0. Mechanistic studies suggest kidney-centric mechanisms including sodium regulation, volume status regulation, and the renin-angiotensin system are drivers of long-term, extra-renal, change.

SUMMARY

Further clinical characterization and mechanistic insight is necessary, and may have considerable translational impact. Programs which screen or follow post-AKI patients may increase clinical utility if focus is expanded to include the SHReDD complications.

Visuospatial and Executive Dysfunction in Patients With Acute Kidney Injury, Chronic Kidney Disease, and Kidney Failure: A Multilevel Modeling Analysis

Background:

Neurocognitive impairment is a common finding across the spectrum of kidney disease and carries important consequences for quality of life. We previously demonstrated that robotic technology can identify neurocognitive impairments not readily detectable by traditional testing in patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) and chronic kidney disease (CKD).

Objective:

The present study aimed to assess whether these quantifiable deficits in neurocognition differ based on a diagnosis of AKI, CKD, or kidney failure.

Design:

This was a cross-sectional analysis of participants previously enrolled in an observational study.

Setting:

Patients were enrolled at a tertiary academic hospital, Kingston Health Sciences Centre, Kingston, ON, Canada.

Patients:

Adults with AKI, CKD, or kidney failure.

Measurements:

Each participant underwent robotic neurocognitive assessment using the Kinarm: an interactive robotic device that uses a series of behavioral tasks involving movement of the upper limbs to precisely quantify neurocognitive impairment across a variety of neurocognitive domains.

Methods:

Multilevel modeling was used to determine the effect of Kinarm task type, kidney diagnostic group (AKI vs CKD vs kidney failure), and the interaction between the two, on neurocognitive performance.

Results:

A total of 104 participants within 1 year of an AKI event or with CKD category G3-5 were enrolled. We found that across all of the kidney diagnostic groups, participants performed worst on the Kinarm tasks of Reverse Visually Guided Reaching (b = 0.64 [95% confidence interval = 0.42, 0.85]), Visually Guided Reaching (b = 0.28 [0.07, 0.49]), and Trail Making (b = 0.50 [0.28, 0.72]), relative to all other tasks. There were no significant differences in average performance across tasks based on kidney diagnostic group. However, diagnostic group and neurocognitive task type interacted to determine performance, such that patients with AKI performed worse than those with either CKD or kidney failure on the Reverse Visually Guided Reaching task.

Limitations:

Kinarm assessment was performed at a single time point, and the sample size itself was small, which may lead to the risk of a false-positive association despite the use of multilevel modeling. Our sample size also did not permit inclusion of the underlying etiology of kidney impairment as a covariate in our analyses, which may have also influenced neurocognitive function.

Conclusions:

In this study that utilized the Kinarm to assess neurocognitive function, patients with AKI demonstrated significantly worse neurocognitive functioning than patients with CKD or kidney failure on a task measuring executive function and visuomotor control.

Use of Robots in Critical Care: Systematic Review

Background

The recent focus on the critical setting, especially with the COVID-19 pandemic, has highlighted the need for minimizing contact-based care and increasing robotic use. Robotics is a rising field in the context of health care, and we sought to evaluate the use of robots in critical care settings.

Objective

Although robotic presence is prevalent in the surgical setting, its role in critical care has not been well established. We aimed to examine the uses and limitations of robots for patients who are critically ill.

Methods

This systematic review was performed according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. MEDLINE, Embase, IEEE Xplore, and ACM Library were searched from their inception to December 23, 2021. Included studies involved patients requiring critical care, both in intensive care units or high-dependency units, or settings that required critical care procedures (eg, intubation and cardiopulmonary resuscitation). Randomized trials and observational studies were included.

Results

A total of 33 studies were included. The greatest application of robots in the intensive care unit was in the field of telepresence, whereby robots proved advantageous in providing a reduced response time, earlier intervention, and lower mortality rates. Challenges of telepresence included regulatory and financial barriers. In therapy and stroke rehabilitation, robots achieved superior clinical outcomes safely. Robotic use in patient evaluation and assessment was mainly through ultrasound evaluation, obtaining satisfactory to superior results with the added benefits of remote assessment, time savings, and increased efficiency. Robots in drug dispensing and delivery increased efficiency and generated cost savings. All the robots had technological limitations and hidden costs.

Conclusions

Overall, our results show that robotic use in critical care settings is a beneficial, effective, and well-received intervention that delivers significant benefits to patients, staff, and hospitals. Looking ahead, it is necessary to form strong ethical and legislative frameworks and overcome various regulatory and financial barriers.

Trial Registration

PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews CRD42021234162; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=234162

Identifying neurocognitive outcomes and cerebral oxygenation in critically ill adults on acute kidney replacement therapy in the intensive care unit: the INCOGNITO-AKI study protocol

INTRODUCTION

Initiation of acute kidney replacement therapy (KRT) is common in critically ill adults admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU), and associated with increased morbidity and mortality. KRT has been linked to poor neurocognitive outcomes, leading to reduced quality of life and increased utilisation of healthcare resources. Adults on dialysis in the ICU may be particularly at risk of neurocognitive impairment, as survivors of critical illness are already predisposed to developing cerebrovascular disease and cognitive dysfunction long-term relative to healthy controls. Regional cerebral oxygen saturation may provide a critical early marker of long-term neurocognitive impairment in this population. This study aims to understand cerebral oxygenation in patients undergoing KRT (continuous or intermittent) in the ICU. These findings will be correlated with long-term cognitive and functional outcomes, and structural brain pathology.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

108 patients scheduled to undergo treatment for acute kidney injury with KRT in the Kingston Health Sciences Centre ICU will be recruited into this prospective observational study. Enrolled patients will be assessed with intradialytic cerebral oximetry using near infrared spectroscopy. Delirium will be assessed daily with the Confusion Assessment Method-ICU (CAM-ICU) and severity quantified as cumulative CAM-ICU-7 scores. Neurocognitive impairment will be assessed at 3 and 12 months after hospital discharge using the Kinarm and Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status. Structural brain pathology on MRI will also be measured at the same timepoints. Driving safety, adverse events and medication adherence will be assessed at 12 months to evaluate the impact of neurocognitive impairment on functional outcomes.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study is approved by the Queen's University Health Sciences/Affiliated Teaching Hospitals Research Ethics Board (DMED-2424-20). Results will be presented at critical care conferences, and a lay summary will be provided to patients in their preferred format.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04722939.