The surgical management of diffuse gliomas: Current state of neurosurgical management and future directions

After recent updates to the World Health Organization pathological criteria for diagnosing and grading diffuse gliomas, all major North American and European neuro-oncology societies recommend a maximal safe resection as the initial management of a diffuse glioma. For neurosurgeons to achieve this goal, the surgical plan for both low- and high-grade gliomas should be to perform a supramaximal resection when feasible based on preoperative imaging and the patient's performance status, utilizing every intraoperative adjunct to minimize postoperative neurological deficits. While the surgical approach and technique can vary, every effort must be taken to identify and preserve functional cortical and subcortical regions. In this summary statement on the current state of the field, we describe the tools and technologies that facilitate the safe removal of diffuse gliomas and highlight intraoperative and postoperative management strategies to minimize complications for these patients. Moreover, we discuss how surgical resections can go beyond cytoreduction by facilitating biological discoveries and improving the local delivery of adjuvant chemo- and radiotherapies.

A Case Series of Surgical Resection of Anterior and Posterior Butterfly Glioma Grade 4 via a Minimally Invasive Keyhole Approach

Surgical resection of infiltrating glial neoplasms has proven to improve quality of life and confer a significant survival benefit. As accumulating evidence cements the role of surgery in grade 4 gliomas, there is a general trend to transition away from traditional large craniotomies to smaller 'keyhole' approaches, which aim to reduce the trauma and complication profiles associated with large exposures. A keyhole approach uses a small craniotomy positioned perfectly to reach at least all the target structures that a conventional approach would reach. We present a case series of operated butterfly gliomas grade 4 patients through keyhole approaches. All three operated patients have better survival than the literature biopsy groups. The resection of butterfly gliomas should be considered in selected cases. For some patients, it is feasible with the technology used nowadays, with improved quality of life and better survival prognosis.

Minimally invasive keyhole techniques for resection of giant intracranial tumors

Background

While keyhole neurosurgery is increasingly utilized in the operating room, there are few reports regarding the use of keyhole techniques to resect giant intracranial tumors. The feasibility and technique of that were discussed in this paper.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 95 consecutive patients who were admitted to our service between February 2012 and September 2017 with a maximum intracranial tumor diameter >5 cm. Keyhole approaches were used to resect these tumors in each case, including supraorbital, subtemporal, suboccipital, retromastoid, frontal, temporal, occipital, parietal, pterional, a combined temporo-parietal keyhole approach, and an approach via the longitudinal fissure.

Results

We achieved gross total resection in 68/95 cases (71.6%) and subtotal resection in 27/95 cases (28.4%). No surgical death or severe disabilities such as coma and limb dyskinesia occurred following surgery. At the time of discharge, 8 patients had complications related to impaired cranial nerve function. In addition, 2 patients developed hydrocephalus requiring ventriculo-peritoneal shunt placement, and 4 patients developed a postoperative CSF leak requiring surgical intervention.

Conclusion

With meticulous design and reasonable selection, resection of giant intracranial tumors utilizing minimally invasive keyhole approaches can be done safely with satisfactory surgical outcomes.

Mini-craniotomy for intra-axial brain tumors: a comparison with conventional craniotomy in 306 patients harboring non-dural based lesions

The use of a mini-craniotomy approach involving linear skin incision and a bone flap of about 3 cm has been reported for several neurosurgical diseases, such as aneurysms or cranial base tumors. More superficial lesions, including intra-axial tumors, may occasionally raise concerns due to insufficient control of the tumor boundaries. The convenience of a minimally invasive approach to intrinsic brain tumors was evaluated by comparing 161 patients who underwent mini-craniotomy (MC) for intra-axial brain tumors with a group of 145 patients operated on by the same surgical team through a conventional craniotomy (CC). Groups were propensity-matched for age, preoperative condition, size and location of the tumor, and pathological diagnosis. Results were analyzed focusing on operative time, the extent of resection, clinical outcome, hospitalization time, and time to start adjuvant therapy. Mini-craniotomy was equally effective in terms of extent of resection (GTR: 70.9% in the MC group vs 70.5% in the CC group) but had shorter operative time (average: 165 min in the MC group vs 205 min in the CC group p < 0.001) and lower rate of postoperative complications both superficial (1.03% vs 6.5% in the CC group p = 0.009) and deep (4% in the MC group vs 5.5% in the CC group p = 0,47). No relationship was found between the size or location of the tumor and resection rate. The MC group had reduced hospitalization time (average: 5.8 days vs 7.6 in CC group p < 0.001) and faster access to adjuvant therapies. 92.5% of the MC patients, which were scheduled for treatment, started radiotherapy within 8 weeks after surgery as opposed to 84.1% in the CC group (p = 0.04). These findings support the increasing use of mini-craniotomy for intra-axial brain tumors.

Bur Hole-Based Resections of Intrinsic Brain Tumors with Exoscopic Visualization

BACKGROUND

 The primary goal of brain tumor surgery is maximal safe resection while avoiding iatrogenic injury. As surgical technology increases, it is becoming more possible to resect these lesions using minimally invasive approaches. While keyhole surgeries are being advocated, the lower limit of these approaches is unclear. Bur hole-based approaches may represent a standardized minimally invasive approach. The exoscope may provide increased visualization over standard microscopic visualization, making this approach possible. This approach has yet to be described strictly for intra-axial brain tumors.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

 All patients who underwent a bur hole-based surgery of an intra-axial tumor with exoscopic visualization by the senior author from January 2018 to December 2019 were prospectively identified and patient information and outcomes were collected.

RESULTS

 Fifteen consecutive patients underwent surgical resection of an intrinsic brain tumor using a bur hole-based approach with exoscopic visualization. The average ± standard deviation age was 57.9 ± 24.2 years. The pathology was a metastatic brain tumor in eight patients (53%), low-grade glioma in four patients (27%), and high-grade glioma in three patients (20%). The average percent resection was 100 ± 1%, where 14 (93%) underwent gross total resection. Following surgery, the median (interquartile range) Karnofsky performance scale (KPS) score was 90 (90-90), where 11 (73%) and four patients (27%) had improved and stable KPS, respectively. Zero patients had complications. The average length of stay following surgery was 1.4 ± 0.5 days, where nine patients (60%) were discharged on postoperative day 1.

CONCLUSION

 This study shows that intra-axial tumors can be resected through a bur hole-based approach with exoscopic visualization with extensive resection, minimal morbidity, and early discharge rates.

[microsurgery 'burr hole' for intracranial tumors and mesial temporal lobe epilepsy]

PURPOSE

In recent years, neurosurgery has been characterized by a clear tendency towards the development of minimally invasive and less traumatic surgical approaches. To minimize the degree of injury to the brain tissue, we have proposed burr hole-based microsurgical approaches.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In the period between February 2016 and February 2019, more than 500 microsurgical interventions were performed through a 14 mm burr hole using a technique that we called burr-hole microneurosurgery; to date, 200 of these have been analyzed. The age of patients varied from 16 to 79 years (median, 38 years). Female patients predominated - 1.6:1. Surgery for intracranial lesions with various locations was performed in 176 cases; in the remaining 24 cases, patients with hippocampal sclerosis underwent selective amygdalohippocampectomy.

RESULTS

Various surgical approaches were used: transcortical approach in 81 (40.5%) cases; retro-sigmoid approach in 38 (19%); sub-temporal approach in 32 (16%); infratentorial supracerebellar approach in 25 (12.5%); interhemispheric approach in 17 (8.5%); telovelar approach in 5 (2.5%); trans-eyebrow approach in 2 cases. The resection degree was evaluated in 167 patients with planned maximum tumor resection. Resection was total and almost total in 145 (87%) patients, subtotal in 15 (9%), and partial in 7 (4%). The surgery duration varied from 35 to 300 min (mean, 80 min). The extubation time after surgery ranged from 5 min to 5 days (mean, 70 min). In 195 (97.5%) cases, patients were verticalized within the first 3 days after surgery.

CONCLUSION

The proposed burr hole technique enables successful surgery in patients with various intracranial pathologies, using a smaller trepanation window compared to that in keyhole surgery. The proposed burr hole technique minimizes injury to the brain substance, significantly reduces patient's exposure to anesthesia, and decreases the entire duration of surgery.