An Evaluation of Systemic Vancomycin Dosing in Obese Patients

Is There a Need for a Dedicated Pharmacokinetic Trial for a Drug in Obese Populations? A Drug Prioritization Decision Tree Framework

Obesity is a growing global health concern associated with high comorbidity rates, leading to an increasing number of patients who are obese requiring medication. However, clinical trials often exclude or under-represent individuals who are obese, creating the need for a methodology to adjust labeling to ensure safe and effective dosing for all patients. To address this, we developed a 2-part decision tree framework to prioritize drugs for dedicated pharmacokinetic studies in obese subjects. Leveraging current drug knowledge and modeling techniques, the decision tree system predicts expected exposure changes and recommends labeling strategies, allowing stakeholders to prioritize resources toward the drugs most in need. In a case study evaluating 30 drugs from literature across different therapeutic areas, our first decision tree predicted the expected direction of exposure change accurately in 73% of cases. We conclude that this decision tree system offers a valuable tool to advance research in obesity pharmacology and personalize drug development for patients who are obese, ensuring safe and effective medication.

Dose optimization of vancomycin in obese patients: A systematic review

Background: Dose optimization of vancomycin plays a substantial role in drug pharmacokinetics because of the increased incidence of obesity worldwide. This systematic review was aimed to highlight the current dosing strategy of vancomycin among obese patients. Methods: This systematic review was in concordance with Preferred Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. The literature search was carried out on various databases such as Scopus, PubMed/MEDLINE, ScienceDirect and EMBASE using Keywords and MeSH terms related to vancomycin dosing among obese patients. Google Scholar was also searched for additional articles. The English language articles published after January, 2000 were included in this study. The quality of the study was assessed using different assessment tools for cohort, and case reports. Results: A total of 1,029 records were identified. After screening, 18 studies were included for the final review. Of total, twelve studies are retrospective and remaining six are case-control studies. A total of eight studies were conducted in pediatrics while remaining studies were conducted in adult population. Most of the studies reported the dosing interval every 6-8 h. Differences in target trough concentration exist with respect to target ranges. The administration of loading dose (20-25 mg/kg) followed by maintenance dose (15-25 mg/kg) of vancomycin is recommended in adult patients to target therapeutic outcomes. Moreover, a dose of 40-60 mg/kg/day appears appropriate for pediatric patients. Conclusion: The initial dosing of vancomycin based on TBW could be better predictor of vancomycin trough concentration. However, the clinical significance is uncertain. Therefore, more studies are needed to evaluate the dosing strategy of vancomycin in overweight or obese patients.

Review and evaluation of vancomycin dosing guidelines for obese individuals

INTRODUCTION

Vancomycin dosing decisions are informed by factors such as body weight and renal function. It is important to understand the impact of obesity on vancomycin pharmacokinetics and how this may influence dosing decisions. Vancomycin dosing guidelines use varied descriptors of body weight and renal function. There is uncertainty whether current dosing guidelines result in attainment of therapeutic targets in obese individuals.

AREAS COVERED

Literature was explored using PubMed, Embase and Google Scholar for articles from January 1980 to July 2021 regarding obesity-driven physiological changes, their influence on vancomycin pharmacokinetics and body size descriptors and renal function calculations in vancomycin dosing. Pharmacokinetic simulations reflective of international vancomycin dosing guidelines were conducted to evaluate the ability of using total, ideal and adjusted body weight, as well as Cockcroft-Gault and CKD-EPI equations to attain an area-under-the-curve to minimum inhibitory concentration ratio (AUC₂₄/MIC) target (400-650) in obese individuals.

EXPERT OPINION

Vancomycin pharmacokinetics in obese individuals remains debated. Guidelines that determine loading doses using total body weight, and maintenance doses adjusted based on renal function and adjusted body weight, may be most appropriate for obese individuals. Use of ideal body weight leads to subtherapeutic vancomycin exposure and underestimation of renal function.

Population Pharmacokinetics and Dosing Simulation of Vancomycin Administered by Continuous Injection in Critically Ill Patient

Background: Vancomycin is widely used for empirical antimicrobial therapy in critically ill patients with sepsis. Continuous infusion (CI) may provide more stable exposure than intermittent infusion, but optimal dosing remains challenging. The aims of this study were to perform population pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis of vancomycin administered by CI in intensive care unit (ICU) patients to identify optimal dosages. Methods: Patients who received vancomycin by CI with at least one measured concentration in our center over 16 months were included, including those under continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). Population PK was conducted and external validation of the final model was performed in a dataset from another center. Simulations were conducted with the final model to identify the optimal loading and maintenance doses for various stages of estimated creatinine clearance (CRCL) and in patients on CRRT. Target exposure was defined as daily AUC of 400-600 mg·h/L on the second day of therapy (AUC24-48 h). Results: A two-compartment model best described the data. Central volume of distribution was allometrically scaled to ideal body weight (IBW), whereas vancomycin clearance was influenced by CRRT and CRCL. Simulations performed with the final model suggested a loading dose of 27.5 mg/kg of IBW. The maintenance dose ranged from 17.5 to 30 mg/kg of IBW, depending on renal function. Overall, simulation showed that 55.8% (95% CI; 47-64%) of patients would achieve the target AUC with suggested dosages. Discussion: A PK model has been validated for vancomycin administered by CI in ICU patients, including patients under CRRT. Our model-informed precision dosing approach may help for early optimization of vancomycin exposure in such patients.

Comparison of Vancomycin Area-Under-the-Curve Dosing Versus Trough Target-Based Dosing in Obese and Nonobese Patients With Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia

Background: A vancomycin target of area under the curve to minimum inhibitory concentration (AUC:MIC) ratio ≥400 is recommended for treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteremia. Objective: To evaluate vancomycin total daily dose (TDD) achieving trough targets versus a calculated strategy achieving AUC targets based on body mass index (BMI). Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed within a large hospital network. Patients with MRSA bacteremia were eligible if they received vancomycin with a steady-state trough (15-20 mg/L). Cockcroft-Gault was used to estimate creatinine clearance, calculating vancomycin clearance and AUC. Patients were stratified by BMI (less than/greater than 30 kg/m²). The primary outcome was vancomycin TDD for the trough-based strategy compared with an AUC-dosing strategy. Results: A total of 119 patients were included, including 51 (42.9%) and 68 (57.1%) patients with high- and low-BMI, respectively. The TDD for trough-based dosing (2390.76 ± 1224.59 mg) differed significantly from AUC-based dosing (1985.07 ± 616.18 mg) across the cohort (P = 0.0014). For patients with high BMI, there was a significant difference (P < 0.0001) in TDD between trough (2637.25 ± 1327.89 mg) versus AUC (1918.71 ± 625.89 mg) strategies. No difference in TDD between dosing strategies was observed among low-BMI patients. Across all patients, 46 (38.7%) experienced acute kidney injury (AKI); high-BMI patients experienced higher rates of AKI compared with low-BMI patients (54.9 vs 26.5%; P = 0.002). Conclusions and Relevance: An AUC-based dosing strategy may reduce vancomycin TDD required for MRSA bacteremia compared with trough-based dosing, particularly for patients with higher BMI.

Evaluation of a modified vancomycin nomogram for obese adults

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare therapeutic vancomycin trough levels in obese adults when using an original nomogram (phase I) versus a modified nomogram (phase II).

METHODS

This study compared a vancomycin nomogram with a modified vancomycin nomogram for obese adults over 100 kg. The primary endpoint compared the percentage of sub-therapeutic, therapeutic, and supra-therapeutic vancomycin trough concentrations between the nomograms. Patients were included if they were at least 18 years of age, had a total body weight of 100-299 kg, and had an initial vancomycin trough level collected. Patients were excluded if they had end-stage renal disease or were on continuous renal replacement therapy.

RESULTS

Therapeutic trough levels occurred in 85 out of 171 patients (50%) in phase I and 98 out of 149 patients (66%) in phase II. The incidence of both sub-therapeutic and supra-therapeutic troughs was less in phase II (p = 0.013). In the subgroup of adults aged 18 to 49 with a normalized creatinine clearance of greater than 90 mL/min, there was a trend in more therapeutic levels with the modified nomogram and less chance of sub-therapeutic levels (p = 0.088). In the subgroup of adults with a normalized creatinine clearance of 60-90 mL/min, there was significant improvement in therapeutic levels and a decrease in supra-therapeutic levels without increasing the percent of sub-therapeutic levels (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The modified vancomycin nomogram at Cone Health showed significant improvement in therapeutic trough concentrations while reducing the rates of under and over dosing obese adults. The Cone Health-modified vancomycin nomogram could be a useful tool for initial dosing of vancomycin in the obese population.

Evaluation of treatment options for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in the obese patient

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has emerged as a major cause of infection in both the hospital and community setting. Obesity is a risk factor for infection, and the prevalence of this disease has reached epidemic proportions worldwide. Treatment of infections in this special population is a challenge given the lack of data on the optimal antibiotic choice and dosing strategies, particularly for treatment of MRSA infections. Obesity is associated with various physiological changes that may lead to altered pharmacokinetic parameters. These changes include altered drug biodistribution, elimination, and absorption. This review provides clinicians with a summary of the literature pertaining to the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic considerations when selecting antibiotic therapy for the treatment of MRSA infections in obese patients.

Evaluation of a vancomycin dosing nomogram in obese patients weighing at least 100 kilograms

Background

There remains variability in both practice and evidence related to optimal initial empiric dosing strategies for vancomycin.

Objective

Our primary objective was to describe the percentage of obese patients receiving vancomycin doses consistent with nomogram recommendations achieving targeted initial steady-state serum vancomycin concentrations. Secondary objectives were to describe the primary endpoint in subgroups based on patient weight and estimated creatinine clearance, to describe the rate of supratherapeutic vancomycin accumulation following an initial therapeutic trough concentration, and to describe the rate of vancomycin-related adverse events.

Methods

This single-center, IRB-approved, retrospective cohort included adult patients ≥ 100 kilograms total body weight with a body mass index (BMI) >30 kilograms/m2 who received a stable nomogram-based vancomycin regimen and had at least one steady-state vancomycin trough concentration. Data collected included vancomycin regimens and concentrations, vancomycin indication, serum creatinine, and vancomycin-related adverse events. Patients were divided into two cohorts by goal trough concentration: 10-15 mcg/mL and 15-20 mcg/mL.

Results

Of 325 patients screened, 85 were included. Goal steady-state concentrations were reached in 42/85 (49.4%) of total patients.

Conclusions

Achievement of initial steady-state vancomycin serum concentrations in the present study (approximately 50%) was consistent with the use of published vancomycin dosing nomograms.

Intravenous Vancomycin Dosing in the Elderly: A Focus on Clinical Issues and Practical Application

The elderly population can be divided into three distinct age groups: 65-74 years (young-old), 75-84 years (middle-old), and 85+ years (old-old). Despite evidence of a shift in leading causes for mortality in the elderly from infectious diseases to chronic conditions, infections are still a serious cause of death in this population. These patients are at increased risk due to weakened immune systems, an increased prevalence of underlying comorbidities, and decreased physiologic reserves to fight infection. Additionally, elderly patients, especially adults in institutional settings, are at an increased risk of colonization and subsequent infection with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus at a rate that is five times higher than in younger individuals, causing an increase in empiric and definitive vancomycin use. Elderly patients have unique characteristics that make dosing vancomycin a challenge for clinicians, such as increased volume of distribution and decreased renal function. Using the best available evidence, it is recommended to initiate lower empiric maintenance doses and monitor vancomycin serum concentrations earlier than steady state to accurately calculate drug elimination and make appropriate dose adjustments.