OUP accepted manuscript

Nectin-4-directed antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs): Spotlight on preclinical and clinical evidence

Nectin-4 (Nectin cell adhesion molecule 4), a type I transmembrane cell adhesion protein, was demonstrated to be overexpressed in a variety of tumors, making it an attractive antigen for targeted therapies such as antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs). Of great note, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approval of the first Nectin-4-directed ADC, enfortumab vedotin (EV), in urothelial cancer (UC) not only introduced Nectin-4 as a clinically validated and reliable target antigen but also confirmed the evolving role of Nectin-4-directed ADCs as novel and promising cancer therapeutics. In addition to EV, there have been or are currently being seven and eleven Nectin-4-directed ADCs, respectively, in various stages of clinical trials and preclinical development, offering a promising future for the treatment of Nectin-4-positive cancer patients. This study reviewed clinical- and preclinical-stage Nectin-4-directed ADCs.

Dermatologic toxicities of antibody-drug conjugates

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are a new and emerging category of oncologic treatments that combine the target specificity of a monoclonal antibody with a cytotoxic payload. These drugs are associated with unique cutaneous toxicities that vary across agents. Currently, there are eleven ADCs with regulatory approval for solid and liquid tumors and over 80 ADCs currently in clinical development, it is critical for dermatologists to recognize and appropriately mitigate the cutaneous toxicities associated with these therapies. This clinical review will summarize the novel mechanisms and indications of approved ADCs, discuss dermatologic toxicities demonstrated in clinical trials and postmarketing studies, and impart recognition and management guidance when encountering these reactions to help maintain patients safely and comfortably on their medications.

Post-marketing drug safety surveillance of enfortumab vedotin: an observational pharmacovigilance study based on a real-world database

Background

Enfortumab vedotin (EV) is an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) that has been approved by the FDA for patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC). This study presents a comprehensive pharmacovigilance analysis of the post-marketing safety profile of EV in the real-world based on the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).

Methods

Adverse event (AE) reports regarding EV between January 2020 and December 2023 were obtained from the FAERS database. The standardized MedDRA query (SMQ) narrow search AEs on the preferred term (PT) level were used. Disproportionality analysis was performed to identify the AE signals for EV with the reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker (MGPS), and Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN).

Results

A total of 2,216 reports regarding EV were included in the present study. SMQ analysis results indicated that a stronger strength signal was found in severe cutaneous adverse reactions, retroperitoneal fibrosis, and peripheral neuropathy. A total of 116 significant disproportionality PTs referring to 14 system organ classes (SOCs) were retained by disproportionality analysis, with 49 PTs not listed on the EV drug label. Frequently reported EV-related AEs included rash, peripheral neuropathy, decreased appetite, alopecia, and pruritus. The time to onset of the majority of EV-related AEs was within 30 days (66.05%), with only 0.73% events occurring after 1 year.

Conclusion

The disproportionality analysis highlights that dermatologic toxicity and peripheral neuropathy were the major AEs induced by EV. The potential AEs not listed on the drug label were mainly related to gastrointestinal, hepatic, and pulmonary events. Further research is needed to confirm and explore the EV-related AEs in clinical practice.

The spectrum of cutaneous toxicities related to novel genitourinary cancer therapies

CONTEXT

Genitourinary cancers (GUCs) encompass malignancies affecting the urinary and reproductive systems, including renal cell carcinoma (RCC), urothelial carcinoma (UC), and prostate cancer (PC). With the rapidly evolving therapeutic domain of these cancers, cutaneous adverse events (AEs) remain among the most observed toxicities.

OBJECTIVE

To explore the dermatologic AEs linked to novel GUC treatments, their underlying pathophysiology, clinical presentations, and risk factors.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A narrative review of the literature from PubMed and Embase databases was conducted. The search strategy included dermatologic/cutaneous adverse events, risk factors, and pathophysiology in conjunction with the following classes of therapies; immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), antiangiogenic therapies, enfortumab vedotin (EV), erdafitinib, and androgen receptor antagonists (ARAs).

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Maculopapular rash, pruritus, and alopecia are present among the five classes of therapies. ICIs demonstrate the highest incidence of severe drug AEs including Steven Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis. Unique cutaneous AEs present with specific therapies including hand-foot skin reaction and subungual splinter hemorrhage with antiangiogenic drugs, stomatitis/mucositis and onycholysis with erdafitinib. Incidence and type of cutaneous AE also differed within therapies in the same class as seen with apalutamide displaying the highest risk of cutaneous AEs within ARAs. Risk factors for development of cutaneous AEs can be general to therapies, or specific, and include age, immune status, BMI, and gender.

CONCLUSIONS

Dermatologic AEs may impact patients' quality of life and increase the tendency to dose reduce, hold or discontinue life-saving therapies, underscoring the need for vigilant monitoring, early recognition, and collaborative management between medical oncologists, pharmacists, dermatologists and other specialists.

Enfortumab Vedotin Drug Eruption: Cutaneous Adverse Events and Histopathologic Findings

ABSTRACT

Enfortumab is a monoclonal antibody directed against nectin-4 and, when combined with vedotin, is an antibody-drug conjugate approved for the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancers. A 75-year-old woman with stage IV papillary urothelial carcinoma of the bladder who completed cycle 2 of enfortumab vedotin (EV) infusions presented to our dermatology department for new-onset symmetric and painful dusky erythematous patches on the extremities and trunk without mucosal involvement. Two biopsies were obtained, which revealed an interface dermatitis with notable ring mitoses within the basal and suprabasal layers of the epidermis without epidermal necrosis. The patient was diagnosed with toxic erythema of chemotherapy and improved with application of triamcinolone 0.1% ointment twice daily without discontinuation of her EV infusions. Although a targeted therapy, EV commonly exhibits cutaneous side effects due to the expression of nectin-4 in the skin. Most cutaneous side effects are mild and can be managed symptomatically. However, severe drug-induced eruptions, such as toxic epidermal necrolysis, have been described. The histologic findings of EV associated skin eruptions can aid in correctly identifying the culprit drug and assist in management. This case provides insights for dermatologists by highlighting the common cutaneous side effects of EV and the associated histologic findings as this targeted therapy becomes increasingly utilized in the treatment of refractory neoplasms.

Antibody-drug conjugates: A review of cutaneous adverse effects

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are an emerging class of anticancer agents that combine targeting antibodies with potent cytotoxic agents. Their molecular configuration allows for increased therapeutic efficacy and reduced adverse-effect profiles compared to monoclonal antibodies or cytotoxic chemotherapy alone. ADCs cause off-target toxicities through several mechanisms, including premature deconjugation of the cytotoxic agent in the serum and the presence of the targeted antigen on normal tissues. Given cutaneous adverse events comprise 31.3% of all-grade adverse events in clinical trials involving ADCs, dermatologists are increasingly called upon to manage the cutaneous toxicities caused by these drugs. In this review, we summarize known cutaneous toxicities of the ADCs that have been approved for use by the US Food and Drug Administration to date. Dermatologists can play a key role in recognizing cutaneous reactions associated with ADCs, contributing to guidelines for their management, and aiding during clinical trials to generate detailed morphologic and histopathologic descriptions of cutaneous toxicities caused by ADCs.

Enfortumab vedotin-induced cutaneous eruption: Ring mitotic figures as a distinctive histopathologic feature

Enfortumab vedotin (EV), a nectin-4-binding agent that affects microtubules, has become standard therapy for advanced urothelial carcinoma. The agent, now given in combination with pembrolizumab, frequently induces cutaneous reactions. Here, we report a severe EV-induced cutaneous eruption. A 58-year-old woman with metastatic urothelial carcinoma developed a rash after receiving simultaneous first doses of EV and pembrolizumab. The eruption began on the flank and spread to involve her trunk and extremities with prominent involvement of folds, including the axillae and medial thighs. Skin biopsy revealed extensive vacuolar alteration of the basal epidermis and numerous epidermal keratinocytic mitotic figures, often suprabasilar, including ring and "starburst" forms. The findings supported a diagnosis of EV-induced eruption. With EV cessation and systemic corticosteroids, the rash resolved over a few weeks. Pembrolizumab was restarted as monotherapy, and the patient's cancer showed a significant radiographic treatment response at 3 months. An emerging literature of small series and case reports, largely from oncologic literature, presents the histopathology of EV-induced cutaneous eruption as a vacuolar interface dermatitis with the inconsistently reported feature of arrested mitotic figures. This case study demonstrates distinctive clinical and histopathologic features of EV-induced eruption, which may inform dermatologic and oncologic management.

Enfortumab vedotin-related cutaneous toxicity correlates with overall survival in patients with urothelial cancer: a retrospective experience

Introduction

Enfortumab vedotin (EV) is an antibody drug conjugate approved for advanced urothelial cancer, consisting of a monomethyl auristatin E payload linked to a human monoclonal antibody targeting nectin-4. No validated biomarker predictive of or correlated with response exists for EV. Cutaneous toxicity is among the most common EV-related toxicities and typically emerges in early cycles. This retrospective experience of patients with urothelial cancer treated with EV monotherapy evaluated whether EV-related cutaneous toxicity correlated with improved outcomes including progression-free (PFS) and overall (OS) survival and overall response rate (ORR).

Patients and methods

Patients treated with EV monotherapy at Johns Hopkins were identified, and baseline characteristics, treatment, and toxicity details were extracted through chart review. Univariable Cox hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated for assessing the effect of baseline patient characteristics and cutaneous toxicity in PFS and OS. Based on the univariable analysis and known risk factors, all subsequent analyses were adjusted for: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, visceral metastases at baseline, gender as well as EV dose, and weight to account for dosing differences. Multivariable Cox proportional HRs were used for comparing PFS and OS between patients with and without cutaneous toxicity, assessing toxicity and EV dose as a time-dependent variables. Adjusted p-values were calculated to compare ORR and disease control rate (DCR) between groups using the Poisson regression model.

Results

Of the 78 patients analyzed, 42 (53.8%) experienced EV-related cutaneous toxicity that appeared early during treatment (median time to occurrence 0.5 months from EV initiation). Cutaneous toxicity correlated with significantly improved OS [HR, 0.48; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.25, 0.9; P = 0.0235], ORR (68.3% vs. 20.7%, P = 0.0033) and DCR (82.9% vs. 48.3%, P = 0.0122). Median PFS was numerically longer in the cutaneous toxicity group (6.3 vs. 1.7 months), although no significance was achieved in the multivariable analysis (HR, 0.62; 95% CI: 0.35, 0.108; P = 0.0925).

Conclusion

In this retrospective study, EV-related cutaneous toxicity was associated with improved patient outcomes. Confirming this observation and understanding its mechanism could lead to discovery of a new clinical biomarker of EV response that can emerge in the first cycle.

Potentially fatal complications of new systemic anticancer therapies: pearls and pitfalls in their initial management

BACKGROUND

Various types of immunotherapy (i.e. immune checkpoint inhibitors [ICIs], chimeric antigen receptor [CAR] T-cells and bispecific T-cell engagers [BiTEs]) and antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) have been used increasingly to treat solid cancers, lymphomas and leukaemias. Patients with serious complications of these therapies can be presented to physicians of different specialties. In this narrative review we discuss potentially fatal complications of new systemic anticancer therapies and some practical considerations for their diagnosis and initial treatment.

RESULTS

Clinical presentation of toxicities of new anticancer therapies may be unpredictable and nonspecific. They can mimic other more common medical conditions such as infection or stroke. If not recognized and properly treated these toxicities can progress rapidly into life-threatening conditions. ICIs can cause immune-related inflammatory disorders of various organ systems (e.g. pneumonitis or colitis), and a cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) may develop after treatment with CAR T-cells or BiTEs. The cornerstones of management of these hyper-inflammatory disorders are supportive care and systemic immunosuppressive therapy. The latter should start as soon as symptoms are mild-moderate. Similarly, some severe toxicities of ADCs also require immunosuppressive therapy. A multidisciplinary team including an oncologist/haematologist and a corresponding organ-site specialist (e.g. gastroenterologist in the case of colitis) should be involved in the diagnosis and treatment of these toxicities.

CONCLUSIONS

Health professionals should be aware of potential serious complications of new systemic anticancer therapies. Early diagnosis and treatment with adequate supportive care and immunosuppressive therapy are crucial for the optimal outcome of patients with these complications.

Advancements in Urothelial Cancer Care: Optimizing Treatment for Your Patient

The standard treatment paradigm for muscle invasive bladder cancer has been neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy followed by radical cystectomy. However, efforts are ongoing to personalize treatment by incorporating biomarkers to better guide treatment selection. In addition, bladder preservation strategies are aimed at avoiding cystectomy in well-selected patients. Similarly, in the metastatic urothelial cancer space, the standard frontline treatment option of platinum-based chemotherapy has changed with the availability of data from EV-302 trial, making the combination of enfortumab vedotin (EV) and pembrolizumab the preferred first-line treatment option. Here, we examine the optimization of treatment intensity and sequencing, focusing on the challenges and opportunities associated with EV/pembrolizumab therapy, including managing toxicities and exploring alternative dosing approaches. Together, these articles provide a comprehensive overview of contemporary strategies in bladder cancer management, highlighting the importance of individualized treatment approaches, ongoing research, and multidisciplinary collaboration to improve patient outcomes in this complex disease landscape.

Racial Differences in Cutaneous Events Among Patients Receiving Enfortumab Vedotin

INTRODUCTION

Enfortumab vedotin (EV) is an antibody-drug conjugate approved alone and in combination with pembrolizumab for advanced urothelial cancer (UC). EV-related-cutaneous-events (EVCEs) are common and rarely life-threatening. Black patients are frequently under-represented in oncology trials, and dermatologic conditions may vary with race.

METHODS

Therefore, this retrospective analysis investigated differences in EVCE frequency between Black and White patients in an urban cohort (Johns Hopkins [JH]) and a US-based, nationwide electronic health record (EHR)-derived deidentified database (Flatiron Health [FH]) with sub-group analysis of those who had received prior pembrolizumab.

RESULTS

The study included 12 Black patients in the JH Cohort (17.1%) and 24 Black patients in the FH Cohort (7.6%). In both cohorts, the frequency of EVCEs among Black patients was higher compared to White patients (JH: 66.7% vs. 33.3%; FH: 25.0% vs. 15.8%), though not statistically significant. In the larger FH Cohort EVCEs were significantly more common among Black compared to White patients treated with prior pembrolizumab (Odds Ratio [OR]: 4.76 [95%CI: 1.42, 15.95]) and recent pembrolizumab (within 90 days of EV initiation) (OR 9.00 [95%CI: 1.94, 41.66]).

CONCLUSION

This hypothesis-generating retrospective study, comprising the largest population of EV-treated Black patients reported to date, emphasizes the importance of attentiveness to EVCEs among Black patients, particularly with receipt of pembrolizumab.

Managing potential adverse events during treatment with enfortumab vedotin + pembrolizumab in patients with advanced urothelial cancer

Cisplatin-based chemotherapy has been the standard of care for patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer (la/mUC). Enfortumab vedotin, an antibody-drug conjugate directed to Nectin-4, and pembrolizumab, an immune checkpoint inhibitor, are two therapies that have individually provided a survival benefit in patients with la/mUC. The combination regimen of enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab was evaluated in EV-302 (KEYNOTE-A39; NCT0422385), a phase 3 study that showed statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in overall survival, progression-free survival, and a key secondary endpoint of overall response rate versus chemotherapy. Based on these results and those from the EV-103 (KEYNOTE-869; NCT03288545) Dose Escalation cohort, Cohort A, and Cohort K, enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab was granted approval from the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of adults with la/mUC. While guidelines and recommendations for the management of adverse events (AEs) have been developed for immune checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy and enfortumab vedotin monotherapy, additional guidance is needed for managing AEs that occur with enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab. As monotherapies, enfortumab vedotin and pembrolizumab are both associated with some of the AEs observed with the combination, such as skin reactions, pneumonitis, and diarrhea, which may confound the attribution of the AE to a specific agent and thereby complicate clinical management. In this manuscript, we aim to provide recommendations for best practice for patient care and the management of AEs of clinical interest for patients with la/mUC receiving enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab, including skin reactions, peripheral neuropathy, hyperglycemia, and pneumonitis. These recommendations were developed based on published guidelines, expert opinions, and the clinical experience of the authors, which include oncologist, advanced practice provider, nursing, and pharmacy perspectives. In addition, guidance on patient education and communication is provided. With vigilant monitoring, early detection, and prompt intervention of treatment-emergent AEs based on recommended approaches described herein, it is the authors' experience that most AEs can be managed with supportive therapy and dose modification/interruptions, allowing patients to continue treatment.

Antibody-Drug Conjugates in the Treatment of Genitourinary Cancers: An Updated Review of Data

The treatment landscape of genitourinary cancers has significantly evolved over the past few years. Renal cell carcinoma, bladder cancer, and prostate cancer are the most common genitourinary malignancies. Recent advancements have produced new targeted therapies, particularly antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), due to a better understanding of the underlying oncogenic factors and molecular mechanisms involved. ADCs function as a 'drug delivery into the tumor' system. They are composed of an antigen-directed antibody linked to a cytotoxic drug that releases cytotoxic components after binding to the tumor cell's surface antigen. ADCs have been proven to be extremely promising in the treatment of several cancer types. For GU cancers, this novel treatment has only benefited patients with metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC). The rest of the GU cancer paradigm does not have any FDA-approved ADC treatment options available yet. In this study, we have thoroughly completed a narrative review of the current literature and summarized preclinical studies and clinical trials that evaluated the utility, activity, and toxicity of ADCs in GU cancers, the prospects of ADC development, and the ongoing clinical trials. Prospective clinical trials, retrospective studies, case reports, and scoping reviews were included.

Enfortumab vedotin following platinum-based chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors for advanced urothelial carcinoma: response, survival and safety analysis from a multicentre real-world Japanese cohort

OBJECTIVE

Real-world evidence regarding enfortumab vedotin for unresectable or metastatic urothelial carcinoma is scarce, particularly in Japan. We investigated real-world data focusing on patient background, previous treatments, response, survival and adverse events in patients receiving enfortumab vedotin.

METHODS

A multicentre database was used to register 556 patients diagnosed with metastatic urothelial carcinoma from 2008 to 2023; 34 patients (6.1%) treated with enfortumab vedotin were included. Best radiographic objective responses were evaluated using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (v1.1) during treatments. Overall survival and progression-free survival were estimated (Kaplan-Meier method). Toxicities were reported according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0. The relative dose intensity, which could impact oncological outcomes, was calculated.

RESULTS

The median number of enfortumab vedotin therapy cycles was 5. The best objective response to enfortumab vedotin was partial response, stable disease and progressive disease in 19 (56%), 5 (15%) and 10 (29%) patients, respectively. The median overall survival and progression-free survival after the first enfortumab vedotin dose were 16 and 9 months, respectively. No significant relationship was observed between survival outcomes after enfortumab vedotin initiation and the enfortumab vedotin relative dose intensity. The median overall survival from first-line platinum-based chemotherapy initiation was 42 months. Twenty-six (76%) patients experienced any grade of enfortumab vedotin-related toxicities; eight (24%) experienced Grades 3-4 toxicities, the most common being skin toxicity (any grade, 47%; Grades 3-4, 12%).

CONCLUSIONS

Here, we report real-world evidence for enfortumab vedotin therapy in Japan. Tumour responses and safety profiles were comparable with those of clinical trials on this novel treatment.

Toxicities of Novel Agents for the Treatment of Advanced Bladder Cancer

Enfortumab vedotin and erdafitinib have specific toxicities that need careful management in order to optimise drug exposure while maintaining patients' quality of life. Patient education, meticulous monitoring, and a multidisciplinary approach are key to optimising outcomes so that patients can reap the benefits of these new treatments.

Drug conjugates for the treatment of lung cancer: from drug discovery to clinical practice

A drug conjugate consists of a cytotoxic drug bound via a linker to a targeted ligand, allowing the targeted delivery of the drug to one or more tumor sites. This approach simultaneously reduces drug toxicity and increases efficacy, with a powerful combination of efficient killing and precise targeting. Antibody‒drug conjugates (ADCs) are the best-known type of drug conjugate, combining the specificity of antibodies with the cytotoxicity of chemotherapeutic drugs to reduce adverse reactions by preferentially targeting the payload to the tumor. The structure of ADCs has also provided inspiration for the development of additional drug conjugates. In recent years, drug conjugates such as ADCs, peptide‒drug conjugates (PDCs) and radionuclide drug conjugates (RDCs) have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The scope and application of drug conjugates have been expanding, including combination therapy and precise drug delivery, and a variety of new conjugation technology concepts have emerged. Additionally, new conjugation technology-based drugs have been developed in industry. In addition to chemotherapy, targeted therapy and immunotherapy, drug conjugate therapy has undergone continuous development and made significant progress in treating lung cancer in recent years, offering a promising strategy for the treatment of this disease. In this review, we discuss recent advances in the use of drug conjugates for lung cancer treatment, including structure-based drug design, mechanisms of action, clinical trials, and side effects. Furthermore, challenges, potential approaches and future prospects are presented.

Case report: Enfortumab vedotin induced refractory DKA and multi organ failure - a rare fatal adverse event

There are very few therapeutic options to treat patients with locally advanced or metastatic Urothelial Cancer (UC). Enfortumab vedotin (EV) was recently approved by the FDA and has become a new therapeutic option for patients previously managed with conventional treatments. Despite its efficacy, EV carries the potential for infrequent yet severe adverse effects. In this report, we present a case of a patient undergoing EV treatment for urothelial carcinoma who developed refractory diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) unresponsive to escalating insulin doses and necessitating continuous renal replacement therapy. While DKA was resolved, the patient eventually succumbed to progressive maculopapular skin rash, liver failure, and respiratory failure. Additionally, the study delves into a review of cases of EV-induced refractory DKA in the literature, shedding light on the similarities in patient profiles, timelines of adverse effects and the treatment strategies employed to manage the ensuing complications.

First experience in treating advanced urothelial cancer with enfortumab vedotin. Single-centre retrospective study of patients qualified for a rescue access procedure

Introduction

Urothelial carcinoma is the most common type of urinary tract malignancy. Current treatment options, including platinum-based chemotherapy or immunotherapy, present significant challenges, ranging from limited efficacy to severe toxicities. Recent developments in antibody-drug conjugates (ADC), such as enfortumab vedotin (EV), promise to significantly improve overall survival. The study aims to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of EV. In addition, we highlight the observed benefits of next-line treatment after progression.

Material and methods

This retrospective study involved 16 patients with advanced urothelial cancer treated with EV at the Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Maria Skłodowska- Curie National Research Institute of Oncology between November 2022 and November 2023. The study evaluated patients' medical history, response to EV treatment, and side effects. Notably, the study included patients who had already exhausted standard treatment options and who were treated with EV through a rescue access procedure.

Results

Partial response was observed in 4 out of 9 (44%) patients with available imaging. Common terminology criteria for adverse events (AE) grade 3 and 4 were observed in 3 out of 16 patients, which subsequently required dose reduction.

Conclusions

Enfortumab vedotin demonstrates effectiveness in real-world settings in treating advanced urothelial cancer. Proper management of AE in experienced centres may further prolong survival. Personalized treatment and the development of new ADC represent the future for improved patient outcomes.

Strategies for mitigating adverse events related to selective RET inhibitors in patients with RET-altered cancers

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of the selective RET inhibitors selpercatinib and pralsetinib has led to a paradigm change in the treatment of RET-altered lung and thyroid cancers through a higher response rate and a more tolerable safety and toxicity profile than multi-kinase inhibitors. Recently, selpercatinib has received a tissue-agnostic FDA approval for all RET-fusion-positive cancers, and pralsetinib has shown pan-cancer activity as well. Given the anticipated increase in the use of both drugs across multiple tumor types, it is crucial to recognize the possible side effects and approaches for their optimal management in order to maximize the clinical benefit for treated patients. In this review, we underscore potential toxicities associated with selective RET inhibitors and discuss strategies to mitigate them.

Nectin-4 has emerged as a compelling target for breast cancer

The incidence of breast cancer in women has increased year by year, becoming one of the most common malignant tumors in females worldwide. Most patients can be treated with surgery and endocrine drugs, but there are still some patients who lack effective treatment, such as triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Nectin-4, a protein encoded by poliovirus receptor-associated protein 4, is a Ca2+-independent immunoglobulin-like protein. It is mainly involved in the adhesion between cells. In recent years, studies have found that Nectin-4 is overexpressed in breast cancer and several other malignancies. Otherwise, several monoclonal antibodies and inhibitors targeting Nectin-4 have shown prosperous outcomes, so Nectin-4 has great potential to be a therapeutic target for breast cancer. The present review systematically describes the significance of Nectin-4 in each aspect of breast cancer, as well as the molecular mechanisms of these aspects mediated by Nectin-4. We further highlight ongoing or proposed therapeutic strategies for breast cancer specific to Nectin-4.

Navigating the Rapidly Evolving Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma Treatment Landscape: Insights from Italian Experts

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To discuss recent advances in the treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC) and how best to incorporate new therapies into clinical practice.

RECENT FINDINGS

There have been several recent practice-changing phase 2 and 3 trials of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), and targeted agents in advanced UC. Based on data from these trials, ICIs can be used as first-line maintenance therapy in patients who do not progress on platinum-based chemotherapy, second-line therapy for those with progression, and first-line therapy in cisplatin-ineligible patients with PD-L1 expression; ADCs and targeted agents provide later-line treatment options. Despite substantial progress in the treatment of advanced UC, there are still many uncertainties, including the optimal treatment sequence for novel agents, and reliable predictive biomarkers to aid in treatment selection. There is also an unmet need for effective treatment options in patients unfit for any platinum-based chemotherapy.

Blue marine therapy: Sea as a trove of natural anticancer drugs

The great variability of marine habitats and the species that live there allows the development of organisms with unique characteristics. These represent an excellent source of natural compounds and are therefore interesting in the search for new bioactive molecules. In recent years, many marine-based drugs have been commercialized or are currently under investigation, mainly in the treatment of cancer. This mini-review summarizes the marine-based drugs currently marketed and presents a non-exhaustive list of molecules currently in clinical trials, as monotherapy but also in combination with classical anticancer treatments.

An Analysis of Risk Factors for the Development of Acneiform Eruptions in Patients on Monoclonal Antibody Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitors

Acneiform eruptions occur frequently and early in patients on epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors (EGFRi). Identification of baseline patient risk factors would prompt earlier referral to dermatology to optimize prevention and management. The primary objective of this retrospective study is to determine the association between clinical and demographic characteristics and the development of acneiform eruptions. A retrospective chart review was conducted on patients diagnosed with colon and head and neck cancers who started EGFRi between January 2017 and December 2021. Patients were followed until death or September 2022. Baseline demographic and clinical parameters were documented and patients were followed from the time of diagnosis to most recent visit for the development and management of an acneiform eruption. Regression analyses were performed to determine the association between baseline characteristics and the development of acneiform eruptions. A total of 66 patients were treated with cetuximab or panitumumab between 2017-2021 were included in the analysis. Forty-seven of the sixty-six patients developed an acneiform eruption while on EGFRi therapy (71.2%). Combination cancer therapy with another chemotherapeutic agent was associated with a lower risk of acneiform eruption (OR 0.03, P = .027). No other baseline features were statistically associated with a lower risk of acneiform eruption. Acneiform eruptions are a common cutaneous adverse event of EGFRi therapy. Ongoing research is required to elucidate risk factors for the development of acneiform eruptions, to improve the quality of life of oncology patients.

Enfortumab Vedotin With or Without Pembrolizumab in Cisplatin-Ineligible Patients With Previously Untreated Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Cancer

PURPOSE

Patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer (la/mUC) who are ineligible for cisplatin-based therapy have limited first-line (1L) treatment options and significant need for improved therapies. Enfortumab vedotin (EV) and pembrolizumab (Pembro) individually have shown a survival benefit in urothelial cancer in second-line + la/mUC settings. Here, we present data from the pivotal trial of EV plus Pembro (EV + Pembro) in the 1L setting.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In Cohort K of the EV-103 phase Ib/II study, cisplatin-ineligible patients with previously untreated la/mUC were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive EV as monotherapy or in combination with Pembro. The primary end point was confirmed objective response rate (cORR) per blinded independent central review. Secondary end points included duration of response (DOR) and safety. There were no formal statistical comparisons between treatment arms.

RESULTS

The cORR was 64.5% (95% CI, 52.7 to 75.1) and 45.2% (95% CI, 33.5 to 57.3) for patients treated with EV + Pembro (N = 76) and EV monotherapy (N = 73), respectively. The median DOR was not reached for the combination and was 13.2 months for monotherapy; 65.4% and 56.3% of patients who responded to the combination and monotherapy, respectively, maintained a response at 12 months. The most common grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) in patients treated with the combination were maculopapular rash (17.1%), fatigue (9.2%), and neutropenia (9.2%). EV TRAEs of special interest (any grade) in the combination arm included skin reactions (67.1%) and peripheral neuropathy (60.5%).

CONCLUSION

EV + Pembro showed a high cORR with durable responses as 1L treatment in cisplatin-ineligible patients with la/mUC. Patients who received EV monotherapy had a response and safety profile consistent with previous studies. Adverse events for EV + Pembro were manageable, with no new safety signals observed.

Enfortumab Vedotin in Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma: Survival and Safety in a European Multicenter Real-world Patient Cohort

Background

Treatment options for patients with urothelial cancer (UC) refractory to platinum and immunotherapy are limited and survival is short. Enfortumab vedotin (EV) is a monoclonal anti-NECTIN4 antibody conjugated to monomethyl auristatin. It was recently approved because of superior survival in comparison to standard-of-care (SOC) chemotherapy. Real-world patients, however, often have worse characteristics than patients included in clinical trials.

Objective

To analyze the efficacy and safety of EV in a cohort of real-world patients.

Design setting and participants

Retrospective data were collected from 23 hospitals and private practices for patients with metastatic and previously treated UC who received EV either when reimbursed by their insurance company before European Medicines Agency (EMA) approval, within a compassionate use program, or as SOC treatment after EMA approval. Imaging and therapy management were in accordance with local standards.

Outcome measurements and statistical analysis

Adverse events (AEs) were reported according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0 criteria. Objective responses were evaluated according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Results and limitations

The median age for the 125 eligible patients was 66 yr (range 31-89). The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) was 0-1 for 76.0%, 2-4 for 13.6%, and unknown for 10.4% of patients. EV was administered in the fourth or later line for 44.8% of patients. The overall response rate was 41.6% (partial response 39.2%, complete response 2.4%). Median OS was 10.0 months (mo) (95% confidence interval 7.20-12.80) and median PFS was 5.0 mo (95% confidence interval 4.34-5.67). For patients with ECOG PS of 0-1, median OS was 14 mo. Any-grade AEs were observed in 67.2% and CTCAE grade ≥3 AEs in 30.4%. The most common AEs were peripheral sensory neuropathy and skin toxicity. Three fatal events (pneumonia, pneumonitis) occurred. Limitations include the retrospective design and short follow-up.

Conclusions

Administration of EV for real-world patients was feasible with an acceptable toxicity profile. No new safety signals were reported. Antitumor activity in our cohort was comparable to data previously reported for trials. In summary, our results support the use of EV in patients with metastatic UC.

Patient summary

Enfortumab vedotin is a medication that improved the survival of patients with bladder cancer in comparison to standard chemotherapy in clinical trials. However, patients included in clinical trials are highly selected and results for toxicities and improvements in survival do not always transfer to the real-world setting. We analyzed data for 125 patients who were treated with enfortumab vedotin. Our results are comparable to the outcomes from clinical trials regarding the safety and efficacy of this treatment.

Rise of Antibody-Drug Conjugates: The Present and Future

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) embody a simple, but elegant, vision for cancer therapy-the delivery of a potent cytotoxic agent to tumor cells with minimal damage to normal cells-so-called smart chemo. Although there were significant challenges in achieving this milestone culminating in the first Food and Drug Administration approval in 2000, subsequent advancements in technology have led to rapid drug development with regulatory approvals for ADCs targeting a variety of tumor types. The most successful application for solid tumors has been in breast cancer, with ADCs becoming the standard of care across traditional human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)+, hormone receptor+ (HR+) and triple-negative disease subtypes. Moreover, the improved features and gains in potency with the development of ADCs have expanded the treatment-eligible population to those with low/heterogeneous expression of the target antigen on the tumor with trastuzumab deruxtecan or in the case of sacituzumab govitecan, agnostic to target expression. Despite their antibody-directed homing, these novel agents come with their share of toxicities obligating appropriate patient selection and vigilant monitoring while on treatment. As more ADCs are included in the treatment armamentarium, mechanisms of resistance need to be studied and understood for optimal sequencing. Modifying the payload to use immune-stimulating agents or combination therapies with immunotherapy and other effective targeted therapies may further extend the utility of these agents in the treatment of solid tumors.

A potential platform of combining sialic acid derivative-modified paclitaxel cationic liposomes with antibody-drug conjugates inspires robust tumor-specific immunological memory in solid tumors

The recent approvals for antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) in multiple malignancies in the past few years have fueled the ongoing development of this class of drug. However, the limitation of ADCs is selectivity toward cancer cells especially overexpressing the antigen of interest. To broaden the anti-cancer spectrum of ADCs, combinatorial strategies of ADCs with chemotherapy have become a central focus of the current preclinical and clinical research. Here, we used the microtubule stabilizer paclitaxel and enfortumab vedotin-ejfv (EV), an ADC carrying the microtubule inhibitor payload monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE), for co-administration under the consideration of their mechanism of action associated with microtubules. We designed a sialic acid-cholesterol (SA-CH) conjugate-modified cationic liposome platform loaded with PTX (PTX-SAL) for efficiently targeting tumor-associated immune cells. Compared with monotherapy, PTX-SAL-mediated combination therapy with ADCs significantly inhibited S180 tumor growth in mice, with complete tumor regression occurring. The formation of a durable tumor-specific immunological memory response in mice that experienced complete tumor regression was assessed by secondary tumor cell rechallenge, and the production of memory T cells in the spleen was detected as related to the increased CD4⁺T memory cells and the enhanced serum IFN-γ. All our preliminary results throw light on the tremendous application potential for the application of this combination therapy regimen capable of mounting a durable immune response and stimulating a robust T cell-mediated tumor-specific immunological memory.

Enfortumab Vedotin-related Cutaneous Toxicity and Radiographic Response in Patients with Urothelial Cancer: A Single-center Experience and Review of the Literature

Enfortumab vedotin (EV) is an antibody-drug conjugate approved for the treatment of refractory advanced urothelial cancer. Cutaneous toxicity is well described but has not been correlated with response. In this retrospective single-center study, data from patients treated with more than one dose of EV between December 2017 and June 2022 were analyzed. Of 56 patients with a median age of 69 yr, 41 (73.2%) were male and 27 (48.2%) had any-grade skin toxicity. For all 51 patients evaluable by physician-assessed Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria, the response rate was 41.2%. For those with cutaneous toxicity, the response rate was 57.7%; for those without cutaneous toxicity, it was 24.0% (p = 0.0145). All three patients with complete response experienced cutaneous toxicity, and two of these responses remain durable 5 and 24 mo off EV. The median starting weight and body mass index (BMI) were, respectively, 80.86 kg and 26.53 kg/m² among patients with cutaneous toxicity, and 69.37 kg and 23.29 kg/m² in patients without (p = 0.0129 and 0.0014, respectively). In this small dataset, EV-related cutaneous toxicity was more common in patients with higher weight and BMI at baseline, and was associated with disease response. Confirmation in prospective trials may confirm this association and lead to an important clinical biomarker of response.

Patient summary

We evaluated patients with urothelial cancer who were treated at our institution with enfortumab vedotin (EV). We found that patients who experienced the common side effect of any type of skin toxicity, such as rash or itching, were more likely to have improvement in their cancer from EV treatment than those who did not experience skin toxicity. Patients with higher weight and body mass index when starting EV tended to have more skin toxicity. We conclude that presence of skin toxicity might help doctors make decisions about how to manage the care of patients with EV in the future.

A Review of Bullous Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated with Anti-Cancer Therapy

The rapid evolution of anti-cancer therapy (including chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy) in recent years has led to a more favorable efficacy and safety profile for a growing cancer population, and the improvement of overall survival and reduction of morbidity for many cancers. Anti-cancer therapy improves outcomes for cancer patients; however, many classes of anti-cancer therapy have been implicated in the induction of bullous dermatologic adverse events (DAE), leading to reduced patient quality of life and in some cases discontinuation of life-prolonging or palliative therapy. Timely and effective management of adverse events is critical for reducing treatment interruptions and preserving an anti-tumor effect. Bullous DAE may be limited to the skin or have systemic involvement with greater risk of morbidity and mortality. We present the epidemiology, diagnosis, pathogenesis, and management of bullous DAE secondary to anti-cancer therapies to enable clinicians to optimize management for these patients.

Mechanisms of ADC Toxicity and Strategies to Increase ADC Tolerability

Anti-cancer antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) aim to expand the therapeutic index of traditional chemotherapy by employing the targeting specificity of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) to increase the efficiency of the delivery of potent cytotoxic agents to malignant cells. In the past three years, the number of ADCs approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has tripled. Although several ADCs have demonstrated sufficient efficacy and safety to warrant FDA approval, the clinical use of all ADCs leads to substantial toxicity in treated patients, and many ADCs have failed during clinical development due to their unacceptable toxicity profiles. Analysis of the clinical data has demonstrated that dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) are often shared by different ADCs that deliver the same cytotoxic payload, independent of the antigen that is targeted and/or the type of cancer that is treated. DLTs are commonly associated with cells and tissues that do not express the targeted antigen (i.e., off-target toxicity), and often limit ADC dosage to levels below those required for optimal anti-cancer effects. In this manuscript, we review the fundamental mechanisms contributing to ADC toxicity, we summarize common ADC treatment-related adverse events, and we discuss several approaches to mitigating ADC toxicity.

Two Cases of Exacerbation of Asthma during Treatment with Enfortumab Vedotin

Enfortumab vedotin is an antibody-drug conjugate against nectin-4 that is recently being used in the management of patients with urothelial carcinoma. The common adverse events include rashes, peripheral neuropathy, and hyperglycemia. Only a few cases of associated respiratory symptoms have been reported. Herein, we describe 2 patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma who experienced asthma exacerbation after initiating enfortumab vedotin treatment. Both patients improved with inhalation therapy. Since nectin-4 is expressed in the tracheal epithelium, its association with asthma is likely. This study highlights that clinicians should caution patients with a history of asthma against the worsening of respiratory symptoms when enfortumab vedotin is administered.

Exploration of the antibody-drug conjugate clinical landscape

The antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) field has undergone a renaissance, with substantial recent developmental investment and subsequent drug approvals over the past 6 y. In November 2022, ElahereTM became the latest ADC to be approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). To date, over 260 ADCs have been tested in the clinic against various oncology indications. Here, we review the clinical landscape of ADCs that are currently FDA approved (11), agents currently in clinical trials but not yet approved (164), and candidates discontinued following clinical testing (92). These clinically tested ADCs are further analyzed by their targeting tumor antigen(s), linker, payload choices, and highest clinical stage achieved, highlighting limitations associated with the discontinued drug candidates. Lastly, we discuss biologic engineering modifications preclinically demonstrated to improve the therapeutic index that if incorporated may increase the proportion of molecules that successfully transition to regulatory approval.

Enfortumab Vedotin Plus Pembrolizumab in Previously Untreated Advanced Urothelial Cancer

PURPOSE

Cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy remains the standard of care for locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer (la/mUC); however, toxicity is substantial, responses are rarely durable, and many patients with la/mUC are ineligible. Each enfortumab vedotin and pembrolizumab have shown a survival benefit versus chemotherapy in UC, are not restricted by cisplatin eligibility, and warrant investigation as a first-line (1L) combination therapy in patients ineligible for cisplatin.

METHODS

In this ongoing phase Ib/II, multicenter, open-label study, 1L cisplatin-ineligible patients with la/mUC received enfortumab vedotin 1.25 mg/kg once daily on days 1 and 8 and pembrolizumab 200 mg (day 1) intravenously once daily in 3-week cycles. The primary end point was safety. Key secondary end points included confirmed objective response rate, duration of response (DOR), and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Forty-five patients received enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab. The most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were peripheral sensory neuropathy (55.6%), fatigue (51.1%), and alopecia (48.9%). Twenty-nine patients (64.4%) had grade 3 or higher TRAEs; the most common were increased lipase (17.8%), maculopapular rash (11.1%), and fatigue (11.1%). One death (2.2%) was classified as a TRAE. The confirmed objective response rate after a median of nine cycles was 73.3% with a complete response rate of 15.6%. The median DOR and median OS were 25.6 months and 26.1 months, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab showed a manageable safety profile. Most patients experienced tumor shrinkage. The median DOR and median OS exceeding 2 years in a cisplatin-ineligible patient population make this a promising combination currently under investigation in a phase III study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04223856).

Platinum-Free Systemic Therapy in First-Line Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma: Mirage or Oasis in the Platinum Desert?

The Oncology Grand Rounds series is designed to place original reports published in the Journal into clinical context. A case presentation is followed by a description of diagnostic and management challenges, a review of the relevant literature, and a summary of the authors' suggested management approaches. The goal of this series was to help readers better understand how to apply the results of key studies, including those published in Journal of Clinical Oncology, to patients seen in their own clinical practice.The systemic treatment for metastatic urothelial carcinoma has evolved over the past decade; however, changes in the first-line setting have remained elusive and dependent on platinum-based chemotherapy regimens. Hoimes et al now present an update on the results of cohort A of the EV-103 phase Ib/II trial combining enfortumab vedotin and pembrolizumab in the first-line setting for patients with cisplatin-ineligible metastatic urothelial carcinoma. The efficacy results in this small, phase I cohort demonstrate an impressive response rate with the majority of patients deriving benefit in tumor control. In conjunction with the results from cohort K of EV-103, recently reported at the 2022 ESMO Congress, there is much anticipation regarding this combination as a future standard of care. However, despite this combination not including a traditional cytotoxic chemotherapeutic, it is still associated with potentially life-altering treatment-related toxicity, most notably rash and peripheral neuropathy, along with the risks of immune-related adverse events, which will need to be carefully calibrated for patients.

Enfortumab vedotin in the treatment of urothelial cancers and beyond

Enfortumab vedotin (EV) is the first antibody-drug conjugate approved for locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancers (la/mUCs), a disease group historically associated with limited prognosis and therapeutic options. EV consists of monomethyl auristatin E, a microtubule-disrupting agent linked to an antibody targeting Nectin-4. In clinical trials, EV demonstrated high response rates and superior survival in the third-line setting for la/mUC compared with chemotherapy. Peripheral neuropathy and rash were among the most common serious adverse events. EV is currently approved in multiple countries for the treatment of la/mUC in the later-line setting. Ongoing trials seek to expand the indication for EV and to study therapeutic combinations with other agents.