Reliability, Validity, Clinical Utility, and Responsiveness of Measures for Assessing Mobility and Physical Function in Patients With Traumatic Injury in the Acute Care Hospital Setting: A Prospective Study

Nursing interventions and activities for patients with multiple traumas: An integrative review

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to identify nursing interventions and activities for patients with multiple traumas who have variations in physical mobility.

METHODS

We used integrative literature review following Whittemore and Knafl method and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses' guidelines and adopting the Oxford Center for Evidence-Based Classification Medicine - Levels of Evidence. The data collection was carried out between October and December 2019 and updated in May 2022, in the following databases: Virtual Health Library, Cochrane Library, Excerpta Medica dataBASE, Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online, PubMed®, SciVerse Scopus, The Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Web of Science.

FINDINGS

There were 103 articles to be fully read and evaluated. From these, 34 publications were selected. Most nursing interventions and activities identified were placed in the NIC class Activity and Exercise Management in the Physiological: Basic domain, which has interventions to organize or to assist with physical activity, energy conservation, and expenditure; followed by Elimination Management (interventions to establish and maintain regular bowel and urinary elimination patterns and manage complications due to altered patterns); Immobility Management (interventions to manage restricted body movement and the sequelae); Nutrition Support (interventions to modify or maintain nutritional status); Physical Comfort Promotion (interventions to promote comfort using physical techniques); and Self-Care Facilitation (interventions to provide or assist with routine activities of daily living).

CONCLUSIONS

The interventions and nursing activities found in this research were not only related to the change in mobility in victims of multiple traumas but also aimed to prevent the consequences of immobility and to take care of already established conditions.

IMPLICATIONS FOR THE NURSING PRACTICE

This research enables the taxonomy's development and the validation of interventions for selected groups of patients. This allows the contribution to the development of the NIC-an important resource to improve nursing practice in teaching, research, and care.

Development of a Short Form Assessment Combining the Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity and the Wolf Motor Function Test for Evaluating Stroke Recovery

OBJECTIVE

To use Rasch methodologies to combine the items of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity (FMA-UE, motor skill) and the Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT, motor function) onto a single measurement metric and create an FMA-UE+WMFT short form.

DESIGN

Secondary analysis of preintervention data from 2 upper extremity stroke rehabilitation trials. Confirmatory factor analysis and Rasch rating scale analysis were first applied to examine the properties of the pooled item bank and then item response theory methodologies were used to develop the short form. Confirmatory factor analysis and Rasch analysis were then applied to the short form to examine the dimensionality and measurement properties.

SETTING

Outpatient academic medical research center.

PARTICIPANTS

Data from 167 participants who completed the FMA-UE and WMFT (rating scale score) were pooled (N=167). Participants were eligible if they had a stroke ≥3 months prior and had upper extremity (UE) hemiparesis and excluded if they had severe UE hemiparesis, severe UE spasticity, or UE pain.

INTERVENTION

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The dimensionality and measurement properties of the pooled 30-item FMA-UE and the 15-item WMFT and short form were examined.

RESULTS

Five items from the pool of 45 items were misfit and were removed. The 40-item pool demonstrated adequate measurement properties. A 15-item short form was then developed and met rating diagnostic scale criteria. All items on the 15-item short form met the Rasch fit criteria, and the assessment met criteria for reliability (Cronbach alpha=.94), separation (person separation = 3.7), and strata (number of strata = 5).

CONCLUSIONS

Items from the FMA-UE and WMFT can be pooled to create a psychometrically sound 15-item short form.