Dexamphetamine treatment in stroke

Potential Role of Dexamphetamine in the Treatment of Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: Hopes and Pitfalls

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is one of most frequent causes of chronic liver disease. Global prevalence of NAFLD and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) with advanced fibrosis is increasing day by day. Patients with NAFLD are more susceptible to encounter cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Apart from lifestyle changes and dietary modifications, no effective pharmacotherapy is available to prevent the progression of NAFLD to NASH and advanced stages of hepatic fibrosis and cirrhosis. Dexamphetamine is the d-isomer of amphetamine, which acts by inhibiting monoamine reuptake and direct stimulation of dopamine and noradrenaline release. Presently, dexamphetamine is indicated for the treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and narcolepsy, but since its use was found to be associated with weight loss, it is also now used as an off-label drug for the treatment of obesity. Direct or indirect evidence is present in the form case reports, case series and from effects of related drugs to support the potential role of dexamphetamine in NAFLD. There is an urgent need to initiate preclinical and clinical studies involving robust methodology and adequate sample sizes to explore the potential of dexamphetamine in patients with NAFLD. In this review, we will discuss the therapeutic potential of dexamphetamine for the treatment of NAFLD.

Potential Role of Dexamphetamine in the Treatment of Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: Hopes and Pitfalls

Collapse

Pharmacological Interventions and Rehabilitation Approach for Enhancing Brain Self-repair and Stroke Recovery

Neuroplasticity is a natural process occurring in the brain for the entire life. Stroke is the leading cause of long term disability and a huge medical and financial problem throughout the world. Research conducted over the past decade focused mainly on neuroprotection in the acute phase of stroke while very little studies target the chronic stage. Recovery after stroke depends on the ability of our brain to reestablish the structural and functional organization of neurovascular networks. Combining adjuvant therapies and drugs may enhance the repair processes and restore impaired brain functions. Currently, there are some drugs and rehabilitative strategies that can facilitate brain repair and improve clinical effect even years after stroke onset. Moreover, some of the compounds such as citicoline, fluoxetine, niacin, levodopa, etc. are already in clinical use or are being trialed in clinical issues. Many studies are also testing cell therapies; in our review, we focused on studies where cells have been implemented at the early stage of stroke. Next, we discuss pharmaceutical interventions. In this section, we selected methods of cognitive, behavioral, and physical rehabilitation as well as adjuvant interventions for neuroprotection including noninvasive brain stimulation and extremely low-frequency electromagnetic field. The modern rehabilitation represents a new model of physical interventions with the limited therapeutic window up to six months after stroke. However, previous studies suggest that the time window for stroke recovery is much longer than previously thought. This review attempts to present the progress in neuroprotective strategies, both pharmacological and non-pharmacological that can stimulate the endogenous neuroplasticity in post-stroke patients.

The Intersection of Central Dopamine System and Stroke: Potential Avenues Aiming at Enhancement of Motor Recovery

Dopamine, a major neurotransmitter, plays a role in a wide range of brain sensorimotor functions. Parkinson's disease and schizophrenia are two major human neuropsychiatric disorders typically associated with dysfunctional dopamine activity levels, which can be alleviated through the druggability of the dopaminergic systems. Meanwhile, several studies suggest that optimal brain dopamine activity levels are also significantly impacted in other serious neurological conditions, notably stroke, but this has yet to be fully appreciated at both basic and clinical research levels. This is of utmost importance as there is a need for better treatments to improve recovery from stroke. Here, we discuss the state of knowledge regarding the modulation of dopaminergic systems following stroke, and the use of dopamine boosting therapies in animal stroke models to improve stroke recovery. Indeed, studies in animals and humans show stroke leads to changes in dopamine functioning. Moreover, evidence from animal stroke models suggests stimulation of dopamine receptors may be a promising therapeutic approach for enhancing motor recovery from stroke. With respect to the latter, we discuss the evidence for several possible receptor-linked mechanisms by which improved motor recovery may be mediated. One avenue of particular promise is the subtype-selective stimulation of dopamine receptors in conjunction with physical therapy. However, results from clinical trials so far have been more mixed due to a number of potential reasons including, targeting of the wrong patient populations and use of drugs which modulate a wide array of receptors. Notwithstanding these issues, it is hoped that future research endeavors will assist in the development of more refined dopaminergic therapeutic approaches to enhance stroke recovery.

Noradrenergic antagonists mitigate amphetamine-induced recovery

Brain injury, including that due to stroke, leaves individuals with cognitive deficits that can disrupt daily aspect of living. As of now there are few treatments that shown limited amounts of success in improving functional outcome. The use of stimulants such as amphetamine have shown some success in improving outcome following brain injury. While the pharmacological mechanisms for amphetamine are known; the specific processes responsible for improving behavioral outcome following injury remain unknown. Understanding these mechanisms can help to refine the use of amphetamine as a potential treatment or lead to the use of other methods that share the same pharmacological properties. One proposed mechanism is amphetamine's impact upon noradrenaline (NA). In the current, study noradrenergic antagonists were administered prior to amphetamine to pharmacologically block α- and β-adrenergic receptors. The results demonstrated that the blockade of these receptors disrupted amphetamines ability to induce recovery from hemispatial neglect using an established aspiration lesion model. This suggests that amphetamine's ability to ameliorate neglect deficits may be due in part to noradrenaline. These results further support the role of noradrenaline in functional recovery. Finally, the development of polytherapies and combined therapeutics, while promising, may need to consider the possibility that drug interactions can negate the effectiveness of treatment.

Using fMRI to compare the effects of benzylpiperazine with dexamphetamine - Their differences during the Stroop paradigm

RATIONALE

Benzylpiperazine (BZP) has been found to increase neural activation in the dorsal striatum when compared to placebo in response to a Stroop paradigm, in addition, subjective effects have been compared to dexamphetamine (DEX). Despite their similarities, the two have not been directly compared in respect to their effects on selective attention and inhibition.

OBJECTIVES

To use a double-blind placebo-controlled crossover study to compare the acute effects of BZP and DEX on executive function using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and an event-related Stroop task.

METHODS

Eleven healthy participants aged 18-40 years undertook the Stroop task 90[Formula: see text]min after taking an oral dose of either BZP (200[Formula: see text]mg), DEX (20[Formula: see text]mg) or placebo.

RESULTS

BZP induced a greater increase in activation than DEX in the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) during the Stroop task. DEX increased BOLD signal in the thalamus and decreased it in the IFG in comparison to placebo.

CONCLUSION

Despite BZP and DEX reportedly inducing similar subjective effects, there are different patterns of neural activation. We believe this differential activity is due to pharmacological differences in their receptor binding profiles and that subsequent inhibitory effects might be due to their direct effect on dopaminergic activity.

The potential utility of some legal highs in CNS disorders

Over the last decade there has been an explosion of new drugs of abuse, so called legal highs or novel psychoactive substances (NPS). Many of these abused drugs have unknown pharmacology, but their biological effects can be anticipated from their molecular structure and possibly also from online user reports. When considered with the findings that some prescription medications are increasingly abused and that some abused drugs have been tested clinically one could argue that there has been a blurring of the line between drugs of abuse and clinically used drugs. In this review we examine these legal highs/NPS and consider whether, based on their known or predicted pharmacology, some might have the potential to be clinically useful in CNS disorders.

A combined therapeutic approach in stroke rehabilitation: A review on non-invasive brain stimulation plus pharmacotherapy

Stroke is a leading cause of disability in the United States. Available treatments for stroke have only a modest effect on motor rehabilitation and about 50-60% of stroke patients remain with some degree of motor impairment after standard treatment. Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques have been proposed as adjuvant treatments to physical therapy for motor recovery after stroke. High frequency rTMS and anodal tDCS can be delivered over the affected motor cortex in order to increase cortical excitability and induce brain plasticity with the intention to enhance motor learning and achieve functional goals in stroke patients. Similarly, low frequency rTMS and cathodal tDCS can be delivered to the unaffected motor cortex to reduce interhemispheric inhibition and hinder maladaptive plasticity. The use of several drugs such as amphetamines, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), levodopa and cholinergic agents have been also proposed to enhance the motor function. Given that both NIBS and pharmacotherapy might provide some treatment effect independently for motor rehabilitation in stroke and with the rationale that they could work in a synergistic fashion, we believe that a combined therapy- NIBS plus pharmacotherapy- canlead to better outcomes than one or the other alone. In this paper we review the literature that support the potential use of a combined approach in stroke recovery and present the studies that have already investigated this idea.

Road to recovery: drugs used in stroke rehabilitation

The practice of neurorehabilitation is unique in that it supplements treatments with medications which complement and expedite the rehabilitation process. In stroke rehabilitation, medications can be used not only to treat poststroke secondary complications but also to facilitate recovery. Since only thrombolytics have been demonstrated to be effective in minimizing brain damage and maximizing functional outcome, intensive rehabilitation remains the most significant and important means by which stroke survivors possibly may maximize stroke recovery. There is an opportunity to complement intensive rehabilitation with pharmacologic interventions that facilitate the recovery of damaged neurons as well as plastic responses in underutilized and unused brain tissue. However, few of these medications have been approved for these indications or have been subjected to large randomized clinical trials. Nonetheless, this review identifies areas in stroke rehabilitation that can be addressed with neuropharmacologic agents, lists specific medications currently used to treat these conditions and describes the evidence that supports the recommendations for these medications.

Acute but not delayed amphetamine treatment improves behavioral outcome in a rat embolic stroke model

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to examine the effects of d-amphetamine (amph) upon recovery after embolic stroke in rats.

METHODS

Ninety-three rats were embolized in the right middle cerebral artery and assigned to: (1) controls; (2) combination (acute amph and later amph-facilitated retraining); (3) late amph (later amph-facilitated retraining alone); and (4) acute amph (acute amph alone). Animals in the combination and in the acute amph groups received a high dose of amph immediately after embolization, while later amph-facilitated retraining in the combination and late amph groups was done by administering a low dose of amph on post-stroke days 2, 5, 8, and 11 followed by retraining in Montoya's Staircase Test.

RESULTS

Rats receiving acute amph immediately after embolization achieved an 11% increase in median blood pressure (P<0.05). An investigation of performances with the ipsilateral paws during days 14-21 showed that the acute amph group performed better than the control group (P<0.02). Infarct volumes were lower among animals in the acute amph group than in both the combination and the late amph groups (P<0.05), while the controls did not differ from any group.

DISCUSSION

In conclusion, results showed that the acute amph group performed the best, while the late amph and the combination groups performed the worst. Amphetamine treatment in acute stroke may be warranted due to reduced detrimental effects of hypotension and improved brain plasticity.

Pharmacotherapy for traumatic brain injury: focus on sympathomimetics

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a devastating neurological injury with broad manifestations. Unfortunately, its diagnosis and efficacious treatments remain elusive. Different post injury symptoms are exhibited at different time frames, indicative of a time-related progression of the pathology. Therefore, particular treatments must be tailored to the post injury time frame. This overview is focused on the secondary chronic phase following TBI and the value of sympathomimetic therapy during this phase. The various direct- and indirect-acting drugs are reviewed, and the treatment protocol employed by the author is described.

Recovery of function in humans: cortical stimulation and pharmacological treatments after stroke

In this contribution, we first provide an overview of general principles of reorganisation in the human brain, and point out possible biomarkers of recovery. Subsequently, we expand on possibilities of adjuvant therapy in human rehabilitation using cortical stimulation and pharmacological treatments. Finally, we suggest future directions for research in this field.

Motor recovery and axonal plasticity with short-term amphetamine after stroke

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

There is considerable debate regarding the efficacy of amphetamine to facilitate motor recovery after stroke or experimental brain injury. Different drug dosing and timing schedules and differing physical rehabilitation strategies may contribute to outcome variability. The present study was designed to ascertain (1) whether short-term amphetamine could induce long-term functional motor recovery in rats after an ischemic lesion modeling stroke in humans; (2) how different levels of physical rehabilitation interact with amphetamine to enhance forelimb-related functional outcome; and (3) whether motor improvement was associated with axonal sprouting from intact corticoefferent pathways originating in the contralesional forelimb motor cortex.

METHODS

After permanent middle cerebral artery occlusion, rats received vehicle or amphetamine during the first postoperative week (2 mg/kg, subcutaneously on Postoperative Days 2, 5, and 8). In both treatment groups, separate cohorts of rats were exposed to different levels of "physical rehabilitation" represented by a control environment, enriched environment, or enriched environment with additional sessions of focused activity. Skilled forelimb performance was assessed using the forelimb reaching task and ladder rung walk test. Anterograde tracing with biotinylated dextran amine was used to assess new fiber outgrowth to denervated motor areas.

RESULTS

All treatment groups showed significant motor improvement as compared with control-housed, vehicle-treated animals. However, animals housed in an enriched environment that received amphetamine paired with focused activity sessions performed significantly better than any other treatment group and was the only group to achieve complete motor recovery (ie, reached preoperative performance) by 8 weeks. This recovery was associated with axonal sprouting into deafferentated subcortical areas from contralesional projection neurons.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that, after stroke, short-term pairing of amphetamine with sufficiently focused activity is an effective means of inducing long-term improvement in forelimb motor function. The anatomic data suggests that corticoefferent plasticity in the form of axonal sprouting contributes to the maintenance of motor recovery.

Dexamphetamine boosts naming treatment effects in chronic aphasia

To date, minimal research has investigated the effect of combining dexamphetamine with standard naming therapy after stroke. The present study used a double-blind, placebo-controlled, multiple baseline, crossover design with two individuals in the chronic stage of stroke recovery. Each individual attended two 4-week blocks of naming therapy (two to three treatment sessions per week). Dexamphetamine (10 mg) was administered at the start of each session during one therapy block, while a placebo was administered during the other therapy block. Therapy progress on treated and untreated items was assessed by a confrontation naming task during and after each therapy block. Both individuals showed greater progress in therapy and maintenance of therapy gains when behavioral treatment was combined with dexamphetamine rather than placebo, although this gain was only statistically significant in one individual. There was no significant improvement on a control task (nonword reading) in either individual. The results provide preliminary evidence that dexamphetamine paired with combined semantic and phonological therapy may be beneficial for the treatment of naming disorders in chronic aphasia.

No improvement by amphetamine on learned non-use, attempts, success or movement in skilled reaching by the rat after motor cortex stroke

Amphetamine (AMPH) has been proposed as a treatment for post-stroke motor deficits when coupled with symptom-relevant physical rehabilitation. Whereas a number of experimental studies report improvements in endpoint measures of skilled reaching for food by rats, there has been no assessment of whether beneficial effects extend to overcoming learned non-use of the limb in the acute post-stroke period or to the qualitative deficits in movement in the chronic post-stroke period. In addition to evaluating the effects of AMPH on success, these were the objectives of the present study. In three different reaching experiments, groups of rats were pre-trained in skilled reaching for food prior to receiving a motor cortex stroke via pial removal. Postoperatively the rats received periodic AMPH treatment and daily rehabilitation. In the acute post-stroke period, AMPH failed to prevent the development of learned non-use of the limb, and in the acute and chronic period failed to improve recovery of reaching success, and also failed to improve the qualitative aspects of reaching movements. Nevertheless, AMPH did enhance adjunct non-reaching movements of locomotion, rearing and turning. The results are discussed in relation to the idea that the beneficial effects of post-stroke AMPH treatment do not extend to all movements, especially the movements of a forelimb in retrieving and consuming food.

A single injection of D-amphetamine facilitates improvements in motor training following a focal cortical infarct in squirrel monkeys

BACKGROUND

There is growing interest in the use of D-amphetamine (D-AMPH) as a pharmacological treatment to supplement rehabilitative therapy following stroke. Based on the success of earlier animal models, several clinical studies have demonstrated beneficial effects of applying physical rehabilitation while stroke patients are under the influence of D-AMPH. To begin to understand the neural mechanisms underlying this promising adjuvant therapy, the authors examined the effects of a single pairing of D-AMPH and rehabilitative training on motor performance after cortical infarct in squirrel monkeys.

METHODS

Microelectrode stimulation techniques were used to delineate hand movement areas in the primary motor cortex prior to delivering a unilateral infarct to the complete hand representation. Postinfarct recovery was assessed for 3 groups of monkeys: D-AMPH + training, saline + training, and spontaneous recovery (SR). Postinfarct training groups received 14 consecutive days of motor skill training on a reach and retrieval task. A single injection of D-AMPH (0.25 mg/kg) or saline was given only on the 1st day of training (postinfarct day 10). Monkeys in the SR group had only minimal exposure to the training task once per week to monitor recovery.

RESULTS

The results show that a single coupling of D-AMPH + training initiated 10 days after cortical infarct facilitated the rate of recovery and improved performance (68% improvement from 1st day of training) beyond the level achieved by the monkeys in the saline + training group (27% improved from 1st day of training).

CONCLUSIONS

D-AMPH is a potent modulator of behavioral recovery following an ischemic infarct in nonhuman primates.

Chronic low-dose administration of nicotine facilitates recovery and synaptic change after focal ischemia in rats

The current study examines the effects of chronic administration of nicotine on motor behavior after focal stroke in rats. Animals were trained in a tray-reaching task for 2weeks and then they were divided into: (1) control+saline (2) control+nicotine (3) stroke+saline, and (4) stroke+nicotine groups. Lesions were produced by devascularization of the surface blood vessels of the sensorimotor cortex contralateral to the forepaw used for reaching. Forty-eight hours after the lesions, and for a total of 12days, animals received two daily injections of either nicotine (0.3mg/kg) or saline (0.9%). Animals were tested in a motor battery 1week after the lesions and every other week for a total of 7weeks. Pyramidal cells in forelimb and cingulate areas were then examined for dendritic length and branching using a Golgi-Cox procedure. Behavioral results demonstrated that by the end of the testing stroke+nicotine animals showed significant behavioral improvement relative to stroke+saline animals. Stroke+nicotine animals showed an increase in dendritic length and branching in pyramidal cells of the forelimb and cingulate areas. The results suggest that the behavioral enhancement in the stroke+nicotine group might be attributable to the enhanced dendritic growth in residual cortical motor regions.

Atomoxetine Enhances a Short-Term Model of Plasticity in Humans

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the role of 2 noradrenergic drugs in modulating use-dependent plasticity in humans.

DESIGN

Double-blind, randomized, and placebo-controlled crossover design.

SETTING

A laboratory in a hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

A convenience sample of 10 healthy subjects.

INTERVENTION

An established paradigm that measures motor memory as a short-term model of use-dependent plasticity. Subjects attended 3 sessions, separated by at least 1 week to allow drug washout. Subjects received atomoxetine (Strattera), venlafaxine (Effexor), or placebo.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Increase in the proportion of movements into the training target zone (TTZ), an indicator of enhanced plasticity.

RESULTS

Atomoxetine, but not venlafaxine, significantly increased movements into the TTZ.

CONCLUSIONS

These results support a role for norepinephrine in enhancing cortical plasticity and suggest potential benefits in using these drugs for improving motor recovery after stroke.