1
|
Ierardi RA, Burnum AL, Camp LE, Delaney LE, Gull T, Havis BM, Johnson GC, Kim DY, Kuroki K, Mammone RM, Mitchell WJ, Navarro MA, Rivero LA, Shapiro K, Smith AC, Valerio CM, Williams F, Zinn MM, Uzal FA. Bacillary hemoglobinuria in beef cattle infected with Fascioloides magna in Missouri. J Vet Diagn Invest 2024:10406387241280741. [PMID: 39301884 DOI: 10.1177/10406387241280741] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Bacillary hemoglobinuria (BH) is an infectious disease, mostly affecting cattle, caused by Clostridium haemolyticum (C. novyi type D), with acute hepatic necrosis and intravascular hemolysis. Cattle are typically predisposed to BH by liver injury caused by Fasciola hepatica, although cases have been reported in cattle without evidence of this parasite. Here we describe a cluster of 14 BH cases from 7 counties in north-central to central Missouri submitted to a veterinary diagnostic laboratory between December 2020 and April 2023. Postmortem examination in all cases revealed hemoglobinuria and acute hepatic necrosis with large numbers of gram-positive bacilli with terminal-to-subterminal spores. Flukes, fluke ova, and/or fluke pigment consistent with Fascioloides magna were identified in 12 of 14 cases. Sequences of the nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer 1 (ITS1) from one fluke had 100% identity to F. magna. C. novyi was detected by fluorescent antibody testing of liver impression smears (11 of 12 cases) and by immunohistochemistry of liver sections (7 of 7 cases). PCR on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues amplified the C. haemolyticum beta toxin gene in each of the 7 cases tested. To our knowledge, a confirmed cluster of BH associated with F. magna has not been reported previously in cattle.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosalie A Ierardi
- Veterinary Medical Diagnostic Laboratory, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA
| | - Annabelle L Burnum
- Veterinary Medical Diagnostic Laboratory, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA
| | - Lauren E Camp
- Department of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA, USA
| | - Lauren E Delaney
- Veterinary Medical Diagnostic Laboratory, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA
| | - Tamara Gull
- Veterinary Medical Diagnostic Laboratory, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA
| | - Brett M Havis
- Veterinary Medical Diagnostic Laboratory, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA
- Idexx Laboratories, Westbrook, ME, USA
| | - Gayle C Johnson
- Veterinary Medical Diagnostic Laboratory, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA
| | - Dae Young Kim
- Veterinary Medical Diagnostic Laboratory, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA
| | - Kei Kuroki
- Veterinary Medical Diagnostic Laboratory, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA
| | - Renata M Mammone
- Veterinary Medical Diagnostic Laboratory, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY, USA
| | - William J Mitchell
- Veterinary Medical Diagnostic Laboratory, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA
| | - Mauricio A Navarro
- California Animal Health and Food Safety Laboratory, San Bernardino, CA
- Instituto de Patología Animal, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia, Chile
| | - Luis A Rivero
- Department of Veterinary Medicine and Surgery, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA
| | - Karen Shapiro
- Department of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA, USA
| | - Amanda C Smith
- Veterinary Medical Diagnostic Laboratory, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA
| | - Courtney M Valerio
- Veterinary Medical Diagnostic Laboratory, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA
- Department of Comparative, Diagnostic, and Population Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Fred Williams
- Veterinary Medical Diagnostic Laboratory, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA
| | - Michael M Zinn
- Veterinary Medical Diagnostic Laboratory, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA
- Idexx Laboratories, Westbrook, ME, USA
| | - Francisco A Uzal
- California Animal Health and Food Safety Laboratory, San Bernardino, CA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Borders SE, Schwartz TE, Mayer TR, Gehring KB, Griffin DB, Kerth CR, Belk KE, Edwards-Callaway L, Scanga JA, Nair MN, Morgan JB, Douglas JB, Pfeiffer MM, Mafi GG, Harr KM, Lawrence TE, Tennant TC, Lucherk LW, O’Quinn TG, Beyer ES, Bass PD, Garcia LG, Bohrer BM, Pempek JA, Garmyn AJ, Maddock RJ, Carr CC, Pringle TD, Scheffler TL, Scheffler JM, Stelzleni AM, Gonzalez JM, Underwood KR, Harsh BN, Waters CM, Savell JW. National Beef Quality Audit-2022: Transportation, mobility, live cattle, and hide assessments to determine producer-related defects that affect animal welfare and the value of market cows and bulls at processing facilities. Transl Anim Sci 2024; 8:txae033. [PMID: 38616995 PMCID: PMC11015891 DOI: 10.1093/tas/txae033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2023] [Accepted: 03/08/2024] [Indexed: 04/16/2024] Open
Abstract
The National Beef Quality Audit (NBQA)-2022 serves as a benchmark of the current market cow and bull sectors of the U.S. beef industry and allows comparison to previous audits as a method of monitoring industry progress. From September 2021 through May 2022, livestock trailers (n = 125), live animals (n = 5,430), and post-slaughter hide-on animals (n = 6,674) were surveyed at 20 commercial beef processing facilities across the U.S. Cattle were transported in a variety of trailer types for an average distance of 490.6 km and a mean transport time of 6.3 h. During transit, cattle averaged 2.3 m2 of trailer space per animal indicating sufficient space was provided according to industry guidelines. Of all trailers surveyed, 55.3% transported cattle from an auction barn to a processing facility. When surveyed, 63.6% of all truck drivers reported to be Beef Quality Assurance certified. The majority (77.0%) of cattle were sound when evaluated for mobility. Mean body condition scores (9-point scale) for beef cows and bulls were 3.8 and 4.4, respectively, whereas mean body condition scores (5-point scale) for dairy cows and bulls were 2.3 and 2.6, respectively. Of the cattle surveyed, 45.1% had no visible live animal defects, and 37.9% had only a single defect. Of defects present in cows, 64.6% were attributed to an udder problem. Full udders were observed in 47.5% of all cows. Nearly all cattle were free of visible abscesses and knots (97.9% and 98.2%, respectively). No horns were observed in 89.4% of all cattle surveyed. Beef cattle were predominantly black-hided (68.9% and 67.4% of cows and bulls, respectively). Holstein was the predominant dairy animal observed and accounted for 85.7% of the cows and 98.0% of the bulls. Only 3.1% of all animals had no form of identification. Findings from the NBQA-2022 show improvements within the industry and identify areas that require continued education and research to improve market cow and bull welfare and beef quality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sydni E Borders
- Department of Animal Science, Texas A&M AgriLife Research, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843-2471, USA
| | - Trent E Schwartz
- Department of Animal Science, Texas A&M AgriLife Research, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843-2471, USA
| | - Thachary R Mayer
- Department of Animal Science, Texas A&M AgriLife Research, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843-2471, USA
| | - Kerri B Gehring
- Department of Animal Science, Texas A&M AgriLife Research, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843-2471, USA
| | - Davey B Griffin
- Department of Animal Science, Texas A&M AgriLife Research, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843-2471, USA
| | - Christopher R Kerth
- Department of Animal Science, Texas A&M AgriLife Research, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843-2471, USA
| | - Keith E Belk
- Department of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523-1171, USA
| | - Lily Edwards-Callaway
- Department of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523-1171, USA
| | - John A Scanga
- Department of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523-1171, USA
| | - Mahesh N Nair
- Department of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523-1171, USA
| | - J Brad Morgan
- Department of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523-1171, USA
| | - Jarrett B Douglas
- Department of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523-1171, USA
| | - Morgan M Pfeiffer
- Department of Animal Science, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, 74078, USA
| | - Gretchen G Mafi
- Department of Animal Science, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, 74078, USA
| | - Keayla M Harr
- Department of Animal Science, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, 74078, USA
| | - Ty E Lawrence
- Department of Agricultural Sciences, West Texas A&M University, Canyon, TX, 79016, USA
| | - Travis C Tennant
- Department of Agricultural Sciences, West Texas A&M University, Canyon, TX, 79016, USA
| | - Loni W Lucherk
- Department of Agricultural Sciences, West Texas A&M University, Canyon, TX, 79016, USA
| | - Travis G O’Quinn
- Department of Animal Sciences and Industry, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, 66506, USA
| | - Erin S Beyer
- Department of Animal Sciences and Industry, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, 66506, USA
| | - Phil D Bass
- Department of Animal, Veterinary and Food Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, 83844-2330, USA
| | - Lyda G Garcia
- Department of Animal Science, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA
| | - Benjamin M Bohrer
- Department of Animal Science, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA
| | - Jessica A Pempek
- Department of Animal Science, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA
| | - Andrea J Garmyn
- Department of Animal Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA
| | - Robert J Maddock
- Department of Animal Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, 58108-6050, USA
| | - C Chad Carr
- Department of Animal Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611-0910, USA
| | - T Dean Pringle
- Department of Animal Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611-0910, USA
| | - Tracy L Scheffler
- Department of Animal Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611-0910, USA
| | - Jason M Scheffler
- Department of Animal Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611-0910, USA
| | | | - John M Gonzalez
- Animal & Dairy Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602-6755, USA
| | - Keith R Underwood
- Department of Animal Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD, 57007, USA
| | - Bailey N Harsh
- Department of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA
| | - Crystal M Waters
- College of Agriculture, California State University, Chico, CA, 95929, USA
| | - Jeffrey W Savell
- Department of Animal Science, Texas A&M AgriLife Research, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843-2471, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Velazco DM, Hess A, Edwards-Callaway LN, Nair MN. Benchmarking the United States bison meat industry: stakeholder perceptions, production parameters, and live animal factors affecting meat quality. J Anim Sci 2024; 102:skae033. [PMID: 38347826 PMCID: PMC10924537 DOI: 10.1093/jas/skae033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2023] [Accepted: 02/06/2024] [Indexed: 03/10/2024] Open
Abstract
The objectives of this study were 1) to understand stakeholder perceptions regarding the bison industry, 2) to benchmark live animal characteristics and production parameters of the bison industry, and 3) to identify live animal factors related to animal welfare and their effect on specific quality characteristics of bison meat. A survey was conducted both online and in-person at the National Bison Association Winter Conference (2022). Descriptive statistics were performed on a total of 110 surveys. Most stakeholders (94%, n = 104) agreed that the industry should continue to grow, and the majority (99%, 108) agreed that animal welfare impacts meat quality. Facility design (80%, n = 88), animal handling (78%, 86), employee training (56%, 62), and transportation duration (56%, 62) were selected as the factors that affect animal welfare. More than half of the stakeholders selected flavor (67%, n = 74) as the most important quality attribute of bison meat. For the in-plant antemortem and postmortem parameters data was collected from three plants in the United States over the course of a year. A total of 2,284 bison (bulls: n = 1,101; cows: n = 199; heifers: n = 984) were included in the study. Antemortem measurements such as distance traveled, vocalization, prod use, mobility, and head bumps were measured, followed by postmortem measurements that included bruise score, live weight, dressing percentage, ribeye area, and instrumental color. Approximately 97% of bison (n = 2,213) had at least one bruise. The average distance traveled from producer to slaughter plant was (mean ± SD; 823 ± 583 km) and the average dressing percentage was (mean ± SD; 60.5 ± 3.3%). Average (mean ± SD) fat thickness and ribeye area were 1.4 ± 1.1 cm and 62.6 ± 9.8 cm2, respectively. Approximately 30% (n = 676) of the bison in this study head bumped between 1 and 5 times in the restraining chute or the single-file gate before being stunned. Linear regression indicated that differences in lean a* were associated with plant, number of head bumps in the chute, ribeye area, fat thickness, live weight, and sex class (P < 0.05). Logistic regression indicated that season, sex class, live weight, plant, and season were associated with differences (P < 0.05) in bruising. These results can be used as a baseline for current production parameters and serve as the foundation for future research to monitor improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David M Velazco
- Department of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA
| | - Ann Hess
- Department of Statistics, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA
| | | | - Mahesh N Nair
- Department of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bista PK, Pillai D, Narayanan SK. Characterization of Three New Outer Membrane Adhesion Proteins in Fusobacterium necrophorum. Microorganisms 2023; 11:2968. [PMID: 38138112 PMCID: PMC10745669 DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms11122968] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2023] [Revised: 12/04/2023] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Fusobacterium necrophorum, an anaerobic Gram-negative pathogen, causes necrotic cattle infections, impacting livestock health and the US feedlot industry. Antibiotic administration is the mainstay for treating F. necrophorum infections, although resistance hampers their effectiveness. Vaccination, especially targeting outer membrane proteins (OMPs) due to their antigenic properties and host specificity, offers an alternative to antibiotics. This study identified high-binding-affinity adhesion proteins from F. necrophorum using binding and pull-down assays with bovine adrenal gland endothelial cells (EJG). Four OMP candidates (17.5 kDa/OmpH, 22.7 kDa/OmpA, 66.3 kDa/cell surface protein (CSP), and a previously characterized 43 kDa OMP) were expressed as recombinant proteins and purified. Rabbit polyclonal antibodies to recombinant OMPs were generated, and their ability to inhibit bacterial binding in vitro was assessed. The results show that treatment with individual polyclonal antibodies against 43 kDa significantly inhibited bacterial adhesion, while other antibodies were less potent. However, combinations of two or more antibodies showed a more prominent inhibitory effect on host-cell adhesion. Thus, our findings suggest that the identified OMPs are involved in fusobacterial attachment to host cells and may have the potential to be leveraged in combination for vaccine development. Future in vivo studies are needed to validate their roles and test the feasibility of an OMP-based subunit vaccine against fusobacterial infections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Prabha K. Bista
- Department of Comparative Pathobiology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA; (P.K.B.); (D.P.)
| | - Deepti Pillai
- Department of Comparative Pathobiology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA; (P.K.B.); (D.P.)
- Indiana Animal Disease and Diagnostic Laboratory, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA
| | - Sanjeev K. Narayanan
- Department of Comparative Pathobiology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA; (P.K.B.); (D.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Strydom T, Lavan RP, Torres S, Heaney K. The Economic Impact of Parasitism from Nematodes, Trematodes and Ticks on Beef Cattle Production. Animals (Basel) 2023; 13:1599. [PMID: 37238028 PMCID: PMC10215612 DOI: 10.3390/ani13101599] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2023] [Revised: 05/01/2023] [Accepted: 05/08/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Global human population growth requires the consumption of more meat such as beef to meet human needs for protein intake. Cattle parasites are a constant and serious threat to the development of the beef cattle industry. Studies have shown that parasites not only reduce the performance of beef cattle, but also negatively affect the profitability of beef agriculture and have many other impacts, including contributing to the production of greenhouse gases. In addition, some zoonotic parasitic diseases may also threaten human health. Therefore, ongoing cattle parasite research is crucial for continual parasite control and the development of the beef cattle industry. Parasitism challenges profitable beef production by reducing feed efficiency, immune function, reproductive efficiency, liveweight, milk yield, calf yield and carcass weight, and leads to liver condemnations and disease transmission. Globally, beef cattle producers incur billions (US$) in losses due to parasitism annually, with gastrointestinal nematodes (GIN) and cattle ticks causing the greatest economic impact. The enormity of losses justifies parasitic control measures to protect profits and improve animal welfare. Geographical differences in production environment, management practices, climate, cattle age and genotype, parasite epidemiology and susceptibility to chemotherapies necessitate control methods customized for each farm. Appropriate use of anthelmintics, endectocides and acaricides have widely been shown to result in net positive return on investment. Implementing strategic parasite control measures, with thorough knowledge of parasite risk, prevalence, parasiticide resistance profiles and prices can result in positive economic returns for beef cattle farmers in all sectors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tom Strydom
- MSD Animal Health, 20 Spartan Road, Isando, Kempton Park 1619, South Africa;
| | - Robert P. Lavan
- Merck & Co., Inc., 126 E. Lincoln Avenue, Rahway, NJ 07065, USA
| | - Siddhartha Torres
- Merck Animal Health, 2 Giralda Farms, Madison, NJ 07940, USA; (S.T.); (K.H.)
| | - Kathleen Heaney
- Merck Animal Health, 2 Giralda Farms, Madison, NJ 07940, USA; (S.T.); (K.H.)
- Heaney Veterinary Consulting, 303 Fletcher Lake Avenue, Bradley Beach, NJ 07720, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Piazza M, Berton M, Amalfitano N, Bittante G, Gallo L. Cull cow carcass traits and risk of culling of Holstein cows and 3-breed rotational crossbred cows from Viking Red, Montbéliarde, and Holstein bulls. J Dairy Sci 2022; 106:312-322. [DOI: 10.3168/jds.2022-22328] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2022] [Accepted: 08/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
|
7
|
Moreira LC, Rosa GJM, Schaefer DM. Beef production from cull dairy cows: a review from culling to consumption. J Anim Sci 2021; 99:skab192. [PMID: 34125214 PMCID: PMC8281100 DOI: 10.1093/jas/skab192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2021] [Accepted: 06/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Although more than 3 million head of dairy cows enter the food supply chain in the U.S. every year, research on this topic remains limited and scarce. Meat production from dairy cows is a significant component of beef production, accounting for almost 10% of U.S. commercial beef production. Thus, the purpose of this review is to demonstrate the importance of dairy cows as a beef source, and to provide an overview on topics from farm to meat product-culling, marketing, transportation, welfare, body composition and its relationship with lactation particularities, carcass characteristics, meat quality, and traceability. Current scientific evidence has shown that culling a dairy cow at an appropriate time has beneficial effects on cow welfare and, consequently, cow value. During marketing the dairy cow is visually evaluated for health and factors associated with its expected carcass value; thus, marketing a well-conditioned cow will ensure that the animal is fit for transportation and provides high carcass yield. However, limitations such as low body condition score, lameness or mobility problems, and visual defects remain persistent. Even though beef harvest plants accommodate cows in all body composition states, the current carcass grade system does not reflect the mature cow industry needs. Therefore, improvement of the grading system could maximize carcass utilization and increase cow carcass value by recognizing subprimal cuts that could be merchandised as whole muscle cuts. Lastly, implementation of a traceability system would unify information from the farm to harvest assisting the industry in making further advancements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ligia C Moreira
- Department of Animal and Dairy Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Guilherme J M Rosa
- Department of Animal and Dairy Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Daniel M Schaefer
- Department of Animal and Dairy Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Moreira LC, Passafaro TL, Schaefer DM, Rosa GJM. The effect of life history events on carcass merit and price of cull dairy cows. J Anim Sci 2021; 99:skaa401. [PMID: 33340041 PMCID: PMC7819634 DOI: 10.1093/jas/skaa401] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2020] [Accepted: 12/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Cull dairy cows contribute almost 10% of national beef production in the United States. However, different factors throughout the life of dairy cows affect their weight and overall body condition as well as carcass traits, and consequently affect their market price. Therefore, the objectives of this study were: (1) to assess relationships between price ratio and carcass merit of cull dairy cows sold through several sites of an auction market and (2) to investigate the effect of animal life history events and live weight on sale barn price (BP) and price ratio (as a measure of relative price), as an indicator of carcass merit. Data from 4 dairy operations included 3,602 cull dairy cow records during the period of 2015 to 2019. Life history events data were collected from each dairy operation through Dairy Comp software; live weight and price were obtained periodically from the auction market, and the carcass data were provided by a local packing plant. Cow price in dollars per unit of live weight ($/cwt) and price ratio were the 2 outcome variables used in the analyses. Price ratio was created aiming to remove seasonality effects from BP (BP divided by the national average price for its respective month and year of sale). The association between price ratio and carcass merit traits was investigated using canonical correlation analysis, and the effect of life history events on both BP and price ratio was inferred using a multiple linear regression technique. More than 70% of the cows were culled in the first 3 lactations, with an average live weight of 701.5 kg, carcass weight of 325 kg, and dressing percentage of 46.3%. On average, cull cows were sold at $57.0/cwt during the period considered. The canonical correlation between price ratio and carcass merit traits was 0.76, indicating that price ratio reflected carcass merit of cull cows. Later lactations led to lower BP compared with cows culled during the first 2 lactations. Injury, and leg and feet problems negatively affected BP. Productive variables demonstrated that the greater milk production might lead to lower cow prices. A large variation between farms was also noted. In conclusion, price ratio was a good indicator of carcass merit of cull cows, and life history events significantly affected sale BP and carcass merit of cull cows sold through auction markets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ligia C Moreira
- Department of Animal and Dairy Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI
| | - Tiago L Passafaro
- Department of Animal and Dairy Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI
| | - Daniel M Schaefer
- Department of Animal and Dairy Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI
| | - Guilherme J M Rosa
- Department of Animal and Dairy Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Aguiar Veloso V, Drouillard JS. On the Potential Role of Dietary Lysine as a Contributing Factor in Development of Liver Abscesses in Cattle. Front Vet Sci 2020; 7:576647. [PMID: 33134358 PMCID: PMC7562714 DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2020.576647] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2020] [Accepted: 09/01/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Liver abscessation is an important metabolic disorder that commonly afflicts cattle consuming cereal-based, high-concentrate diets. Economic ramifications of liver abscessation are substantial, and include liver condemnation, decreased body weight gain, poorer efficiency of feed utilization, reduced carcass yield, and impairments in operational efficiency of commercial abattoirs. The etiological agent most commonly associated with liver abscesses is Fusobacterium necrophorum, which is an anaerobic, Gram-negative, nonmotile, nonsporulating, and rod-shaped (pleomorphic) bacterium. Fusobacterium necrophorum is one of the major proteolytic species of bacteria in the rumen, and it is believed to have a major role in degradation of dietary lysine. Herein we describe interactions between lysine and F. necrophorum, and the potential role of dietary lysine as an enabling factor in the development of liver abscesses in cattle.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vanessa Aguiar Veloso
- Department of Animal Sciences and Industry, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, United States
| | - James S Drouillard
- Department of Animal Sciences and Industry, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, United States
| |
Collapse
|