Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in Hodgkin disease

Factors affecting receipt of expensive cancer treatments and mortality: evidence from stem cell transplantation for leukemia and lymphoma

OBJECTIVE

To identify factors that affect whether patients diagnosed with either leukemia or lymphoma receive a stem cell transplant and secondly if receipt of stem cell transplantation is linked to improved survival.

DATA

California inpatient discharge records (2002-2003) for patients with either leukemia or lymphoma linked with vital statistics death records (2002-2005).

STUDY DESIGN

Bivariate Probit treatment effects model that accounts for both the type of treatment received and survival while controlling for nonrandom selection due to unobservable factors.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Having private insurance coverage and residence in a well-educated county increased the chances a patient with either disease received HSCT. Increasing age and travel distance to the nearest transplant hospital had the opposite effect. Receipt of HSCT had a significant impact on mortality. We found the probability of death was 4.3 percentage points higher for leukemia patients who did NOT have HSCT. Receipt of HSCT reduced the chances of dying by almost 50 percent. The likelihood of death among lymphoma patients who underwent HSCT was almost 5 percentage points lower, a 70 percent reduction in the probability of death.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings raise concern about access to expensive, but highly effective cancer treatments for patients with certain hematologic malignancies.

Brazilian experience using high-dose sequential chemotherapy followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for relapsed or refractory Hodgkin lymphoma

PURPOSE

We evaluate the effectiveness and toxicity of high-dose sequential chemotherapy (HDS) as salvage therapy in patients with advanced-stage Hodgkin lymphoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis on 77 patients receiving HDS between 1998 and 2006. Patients enrolled were in disease progression or relapsed disease, or did not achieve a complete remission after first-line treatment. HDS consisted of the sequential administration of cyclophosphamide and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor with stem cell harvesting, followed by methotrexate plus vincristine and etoposide.

RESULTS

The majority of patients had stage III/IV (64%) and B symptoms (71.4%). Disease status improvement after HDS was observed in 24 of 57 patients (42%) previously in disease progression or relapse. HDS-related deaths occurred in 8 of 77 patients (10.4%). Four patients (5.2%) developed acute myeloid leukemia/myelodysplastic syndrome. Overall, disease-free and progression-free survival was 27%, 57%, and 25%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Despite the treatment-related mortality, HDS is feasible, with satisfactory response rates, even in patients with poor prognosis.

Activity of single-agent melphalan 220–300 mg/m2 with amifostine cytoprotection and autologous hematopoietic stem cell support in non-Hodgkin and Hodgkin lymphoma

High-dose chemotherapy using melphalan (HDMEL) is an important component of many conditioning regimens that are given before autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT). In contrast to the situation in myeloma, and to a lesser degree acute leukemia, only a very limited published experience exists with the use of HDMEL conditioning as a single agent in doses requiring AHSCT for lymphoma, both Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) and especially non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Thus, we report results of treating 26 lymphoma patients (22 with NHL and four with HL) with HDMEL 220-300 mg/m(2) plus amifostine (AF) cytoprotection and AHSCT as part of a phase I-II trial. Median age was 51 years (range 24-62 years); NHL histology was varied, but was aggressive (including transformed from indolent) in 19 patients, indolent in two patients and mantle cell in one. All 26 patients had been extensively treated; 11 were refractory to the immediate prior therapy on protocol entry and two had undergone prior AHSCT. All were deemed ineligible for other, 'first-line' AHSCT regimens. Of these 26 patients, 22 survived to initial tumor evaluation on D +100. At this time, 13 were in complete remission, including four patients who were in second CR before HDMEL+AF+AHSCT. Responses occurred at all HDMEL doses. Currently, seven patients are alive, including five without progression, with a median follow-up in these latter patients of D +1163 (range D +824 to D +1630); one of these patients had a nonmyeloablative allograft as consolidation on D +106. Conversely, 14 patients relapsed or progressed, including five who had previously achieved CR with the AHSCT procedure. Two patients, both with HL, remain alive after progression; one is in CR following salvage radiotherapy. Six patients died due to nonrelapse causes, including two NHL patients who died while in CR. We conclude that HDMEL+AF+AHSCT has significant single-agent activity in relapsed or refractory NHL and HL. This experience may be used as a starting point for subsequent dose escalation of HDMEL (probably with AF) in established combination regimens.

Reduced-intensity allogeneic transplantation for lymphoma

Reduced-intensity allogeneic transplants are promising, increasingly used treatments for hematologic malignancies, exploiting graft-versus-tumor effects for eradicating malignancies. This article reviews approximately 40 published reports of reduced-intensity allogeneic transplants in lymphomas. Overall, reduced-intensity allogeneic transplants have been well tolerated and have produced encouraging results despite a diversity of transplant approaches used largely in heavily pretreated and older patients. Of 368 lymphoma patients who underwent reduced-intensity allogeneic transplants, 66.3% had responses, most of which were complete. Many had chemotherapy-refractory lymphomas, including some that relapsed after autologous transplants. Although the short follow-up periods of many studies do not permit assessments of response duration, protracted remissions were reported in some studies. Additionally, some patients entered molecular remissions, suggesting that graft-versus-tumor effects could, by themselves, cure some lymphomas. Graft-versus-host disease is the major risk of reduced-intensity allogeneic transplants, and treatment methods need refinement to reduce transplant risks while preserving graft-versus-tumor effects. Controlled trials involving patients with earlier-stage disease appear warranted to define better the role of reduced-intensity allogeneic transplants in treating lymphomas.