Cochlear Implants and Quality of Life: A Prospective Study

Gene Therapy for Hearing Loss: Which Genes Next?

INTRODUCTION

Hearing loss is the most common sensory deficit in humans, and roughly half of childhood-onset sensorineural hearing loss is genetic. Advances in gene therapy techniques have led to the first clinical trials for OTOF-associated hearing loss DFNB9. Therapies for other hearing loss genes are in various stages of development, and therefore a comprehensive evaluation of potential candidate genes can help to prioritize and guide these efforts.

METHODS

A list of 93 nonsyndromic hearing loss genes with consensus support was generated. Critical factors for evaluation were identified as gene size, timing of cochlear degradation, cell type(s) of primary expression, availability of mouse models and efficacy of adeno-associated virus experiments in those mice, and human hearing loss severity, onset, and prevalence. Each factor was addressed with gene-specific PubMed searches for applicable studies.

RESULTS

Each gene was evaluated according to the above factors, with favorable results indicating the most promising candidates for gene therapy. Genes that satisfied all the above conditions included TMPRSS3, PCDH15, and TMC1. Other genes, such as LOXHD1 and MYO6, had not yet had gene replacement attempts in a mouse model but otherwise satisfied all conditions and were likewise identified as promising candidates.

CONCLUSION

Based on this analysis, hearing loss genes vary widely in terms of their favorability for treatment by gene therapy approaches. Targeting development efforts to promising candidates will ensure the highest likelihood of clinical success. Several genes were identified as appealing next targets, signaling an increasing role of gene therapies in hearing loss care moving forward.

Assessment of Cochlear Implant Rehabilitation Success by Speech-Language Therapists Using International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Criteria

PURPOSE

This study aims to introduce an assessment questionnaire based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) to enable quantifiable clinical documentation. The questionnaire assists speech-language therapists (SLTs) in evaluating both non-audiological and audiological rehabilitation outcomes of patients with cochlear implants (CIs).

METHOD

Six SLTs were recruited to evaluate the effectiveness of CI care using ICF criteria. We carefully selected 20 pertinent ICF criteria, and SLTs received thorough training in how to apply them uniformly. A cohort of 48 patients was evaluated at three distinct time points: presurgery, postsurgery, and 6 months post-initial CI fitting. Patients underwent dedicated speech-language therapy sessions throughout the treatment course.

RESULTS

A total of 144 complete datasets were scrutinized using a two-factor analysis of variance for ranks. Following CI care, patients exhibited substantial improvements in auditory perception, characterized by enhanced sound recognition and speech discrimination. Additionally, patients demonstrated improved attentional focus, proficiency in daily tasks and increased conversational engagement over time. Environmental factors, particularly sound perception, improved markedly, correlating with reported reductions in stress levels. Minimal changes were noted in stress management and communication techniques. Articulatory function, speech functions, and pain perception exhibited the least alteration.

CONCLUSIONS

The data extracted from the ICF-based assessments underscore the vital significance of incorporating speech therapy-based metrics to evaluate both non-audiological and audiological factors in assessing the success of CI care within the SLTs domain. This approach proves to be highly relevant both in terms of demonstration and clinical applicability.

Guiding Ethical Decisions in Cochlear Implantation for the Hearing Impaired with Comorbid Psychosis

AbstractCochlear implants can restore hearing in people with severe hearing loss and have a significant impact on communication, social integration, self-esteem, and quality of life. However, whether and how much clinical benefit is derived from cochlear implants varies significantly by patient and is influenced by the etiology and extent of hearing loss, medical comorbidities, and preexisting behavioral and psychosocial issues. In patients with underlying psychosis, concerns have been raised that the introduction of auditory stimuli could trigger hallucinations, worsen existing delusions, or exacerbate erratic behavior. This concern has made psychosis a relative contraindication to cochlear implant surgery. This is problematic because there is a lack of data describing this phenomenon and because the psychosocial benefits derived from improvement in auditory function may be a critical intervention for treating psychosis in some patients. The objective of this report is to provide an ethical framework for guiding clinical decision-making on cochlear implant surgery in the hearing impaired with psychosis.

Cochlear implantation impact on health service utilisation and social outcomes: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Hearing loss can have a negative impact on individuals' health and engagement with social activities. Integrated approaches that tackle barriers and social outcomes could mitigate some of these effects for cochlear implants (CI) users. This review aims to synthesise the evidence of the impact of a CI on adults' health service utilisation and social outcomes.

METHODS

Five databases (MEDLINE, Scopus, ERIC, CINAHL and PsychINFO) were searched from 1st January 2000 to 16 January 2023 and May 2023. Articles that reported on health service utilisation or social outcomes post-CI in adults aged ≥ 18 years were included. Health service utilisation includes hospital admissions, emergency department (ED) presentations, general practitioner (GP) visits, CI revision surgery and pharmaceutical use. Social outcomes include education, autonomy, social participation, training, disability, social housing, social welfare benefits, occupation, employment, income level, anxiety, depression, quality of life (QoL), communication and cognition. Searched articles were screened in two stages ̶̶̶ by going through the title and abstract then full text. Information extracted from the included studies was narratively synthesised.

RESULTS

There were 44 studies included in this review, with 20 (45.5%) cohort studies, 18 (40.9%) cross-sectional and six (13.6%) qualitative studies. Nine studies (20.5%) reported on health service utilisation and 35 (79.5%) on social outcomes. Five out of nine studies showed benefits of CI in improving adults' health service utilisation including reduced use of prescription medication, reduced number of surgical and audiological visits. Most of the studies 27 (77.1%) revealed improvements for at least one social outcome, such as work or employment 18 (85.7%), social participation 14 (93.3%), autonomy 8 (88.9%), education (all nine studies), perceived hearing disability (five out of six studies) and income (all three studies) post-CI. None of the included studies had a low risk of bias.

CONCLUSIONS

This review identified beneficial impacts of CI in improving adults' health service utilisation and social outcomes. Improvement in hearing enhanced social interactions and working lives. There is a need for large scale, well-designed epidemiological studies examining health and social outcomes post-CI.

Patient-centered empirical research on ethically relevant psychosocial and cultural aspects of cochlear, glaucoma and cardiovascular implants - a scoping review

BACKGROUND

The significance of medical implants goes beyond technical functioning and reaches into everyday life, with consequences for individuals as well as society. Ethical aspects associated with the everyday use of implants are relevant for individuals' lifeworlds and need to be considered in implant care and in the course of technical developments.

METHODS

This scoping review aimed to provide a synthesis of the existing evidence regarding ethically relevant psychosocial and cultural aspects in cochlear, glaucoma and cardiovascular implants in patient-centered empirical research. Systematic literature searches were conducted in EBSCOhost, Philpapers, PsycNET, Pubmed, Web of Science and BELIT databases. Eligible studies were articles in German or English language published since 2000 dealing with ethically relevant aspects of cochlear, glaucoma and passive cardiovascular implants based on empirical findings from the perspective of (prospective) implant-wearers and their significant others. Following a descriptive-analytical approach, a data extraction form was developed and relevant data were extracted accordingly. We combined a basic numerical analysis of study characteristics with a thematically organized narrative synthesis of the data.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine studies were included in the present analysis. Fifty were in the field of cochlear implants, sixteen in the field of passive cardiovascular implants and three in the field of glaucoma implants. Implant-related aspects were mainly found in connection with autonomy, freedom, identity, participation and justice, whereas little to no data was found with regards to ethical principles of privacy, safety or sustainability.

CONCLUSIONS

Empirical research on ethical aspects of implant use in everyday life is highly relevant, but marked by ambiguity and unclarity in the operationalization of ethical terms and contextualization. A transparent orientation framework for the exploration and acknowledgment of ethical aspects in "lived experiences" may contribute to the improvement of individual care, healthcare programs and research quality in this area. Ethics-sensitive care requires creating awareness for cultural and identity-related issues, promoting health literacy to strengthen patient autonomy as well as adjusting healthcare programs accordingly. More consideration needs to be given to sustainability issues in implant development and care according to an approach of ethics-by-design.

Predictors of Short-Term Changes in Quality of Life after Cochlear Implantation

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed 1) to measure the effect of cochlear implantation on health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) using the Cochlear Implant Quality of Life (CIQOL) questionnaire and 2) to determine audiologic, demographic, and non-CI/hearing-related QOL factors influencing the CIQOL.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective observational study.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS AND INTERVENTIONS

Thirty-seven adult patients with sensorineural hearing loss undergoing cochlear implantation.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

CIQOL-global score preimplantation and 6 months postimplantation. Physical function score as measured by the short-form survey, audiologic, and demographic variables.

RESULTS

CIQOL showed significant improvement from preimplantation to 6 months postactivation with a mean difference of 14.9 points (95% confidence interval, 11.3 to 18.5, p < 0.0001). Improvement in CIQOL (ΔCIQOL) correlated linearly with age ( r = -0.49, p = 0.001) and improvement in speech perception testing ( r = 0.63, p < 0.0001). Multivariate modeling using age and change in consonant-vowel nucleus-consonant (CNC) score explained 46% of the variability measured by the ΔCIQOL-global score.

CONCLUSIONS

Nearly all CI recipients achieve significant gains for all domains as measured by the CIQOL. However, younger patients and those with a greater improvement in speech perception performance (CNC) are more likely to achieve a greater CIQOL benefit. Results here suggest the importance of considering preoperative CIQOL and speech perception measures when evaluating predictors of HR-QOL.

Association of Genetic Diagnoses for Childhood-Onset Hearing Loss With Cochlear Implant Outcomes

Importance

In the US, most childhood-onset bilateral sensorineural hearing loss is genetic, with more than 120 genes and thousands of different alleles known. Primary treatments are hearing aids and cochlear implants. Genetic diagnosis can inform progression of hearing loss, indicate potential syndromic features, and suggest best timing for individualized treatment.

Objective

To identify the genetic causes of childhood-onset hearing loss and characterize severity, progression, and cochlear implant success associated with genotype in a single large clinical cohort.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cross-sectional analysis (genomics) and retrospective cohort analysis (audiological measures) were conducted from 2019 to 2022 at the otolaryngology and audiology clinics of Seattle Children's Hospital and the University of Washington and included 449 children from 406 families with bilateral sensorineural hearing loss with an onset younger than 18 years. Data were analyzed between January and June 2022.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Genetic diagnoses based on genomic sequencing and structural variant analysis of the DNA of participants; severity and progression of hearing loss as measured by audiologic testing; and cochlear implant success as measured by pediatric and adult speech perception tests. Hearing thresholds and speech perception scores were evaluated with respect to age at implant, months since implant, and genotype using a multivariate analysis of variance and covariance.

Results

Of 406 participants, 208 (51%) were female, 17 (4%) were African/African American, 32 (8%) were East Asian, 219 (54%) were European, 53 (13%) were Latino/Admixed American, and 16 (4%) were South Asian. Genomic analysis yielded genetic diagnoses for 210 of 406 families (52%), including 55 of 82 multiplex families (67%) and 155 of 324 singleton families (48%). Rates of genetic diagnosis were similar for children of all ancestries. Causal variants occurred in 43 different genes, with each child (with 1 exception) having causative variant(s) in only 1 gene. Hearing loss severity, affected frequencies, and progression varied by gene and, for some genes, by genotype within gene. For children with causative mutations in MYO6, OTOA, SLC26A4, TMPRSS3, or severe loss-of-function variants in GJB2, hearing loss was progressive, with losses of more than 10 dB per decade. For all children with cochlear implants, outcomes of adult speech perception tests were greater than preimplanted levels. Yet the degree of success varied substantially by genotype. Adjusting for age at implant and interval since implant, speech perception was highest for children with hearing loss due to MITF or TMPRSS3.

Conclusions and Relevance

The results of this cross-sectional study suggest that genetic diagnosis is now sufficiently advanced to enable its integration into precision medical care for childhood-onset hearing loss.

Intensive Training of Spatial Hearing Promotes Auditory Abilities of Bilateral Cochlear Implant Adults: A Pilot Study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of a virtual reality-based spatial hearing training protocol in bilateral cochlear implant (CI) users and to provide pilot data on the impact of this training on different qualities of hearing.

DESIGN

Twelve bilateral CI adults aged between 19 and 69 followed an intensive 10-week rehabilitation program comprised eight virtual reality training sessions (two per week) interspersed with several evaluation sessions (2 weeks before training started, after four and eight training sessions, and 1 month after the end of training). During each 45-minute training session, participants localized a sound source whose position varied in azimuth and/or in elevation. At the start of each trial, CI users received no information about sound location, but after each response, feedback was given to enable error correction. Participants were divided into two groups: a multisensory feedback group (audiovisual spatial cue) and an unisensory group (visual spatial cue) who only received feedback in a wholly intact sensory modality. Training benefits were measured at each evaluation point using three tests: 3D sound localization in virtual reality, the French Matrix test, and the Speech, Spatial and other Qualities of Hearing questionnaire.

RESULTS

The training was well accepted and all participants attended the whole rehabilitation program. Four training sessions spread across 2 weeks were insufficient to induce significant performance changes, whereas performance on all three tests improved after eight training sessions. Front-back confusions decreased from 32% to 14.1% ( p = 0.017); speech recognition threshold score from 1.5 dB to -0.7 dB signal-to-noise ratio ( p = 0.029) and eight CI users successfully achieved a negative signal-to-noise ratio. One month after the end of structured training, these performance improvements were still present, and quality of life was significantly improved for both self-reports of sound localization (from 5.3 to 6.7, p = 0.015) and speech understanding (from 5.2 to 5.9, p = 0.048).

CONCLUSIONS

This pilot study shows the feasibility and potential clinical relevance of this type of intervention involving a sensorial immersive environment and could pave the way for more systematic rehabilitation programs after cochlear implantation.

Psychometric properties of the English version of the Audio Processor Satisfaction Questionnaire (APSQ)

Objective

The Audio Processor Satisfaction Questionnaire (APSQ) is a standardized tool to measure a user’s satisfaction with their audio processor(s). It was first developed and validated in the German language. The purpose of the current study was to validate the English version of the APSQ.

Design

The 15 items of the APSQ were translated into English. Item and scale analyses assessed the quality of individual items and of the questionnaire in its entirety.

Study sample

Sixty-seven adults with hearing implants participated. Forty-six of them completed the questionnaire twice within 2–4 weeks.

Results

High mean values were obtained with total scores and with scores of the comfort, social life, and usability domains, indicating that users are generally satisfied with their audio processors. The questionnaire achieved good test-retest reliability with high internal consistency. A significant positive correlation between time since implantation and user satisfaction was found.

Conclusion

Results of the item and reliability analyses suggest that the English version of the APSQ is a valid and reliable tool to assess user satisfaction with their audio processor(s).

The body image in hearing aid and cochlear implant users in Turkey

PURPOSE

We investigated the relationship between hearing aid or cochlear implants usage and body image, and quality of life.

METHODS

Of the 96 participants studied, 26 were cochlear implant users, 20 hearing aid users, 20 non-device users with hearing loss, and 30 normal hearing. The inclusion criteria for the study for all groups were subjects 18 years or older with no other physical complaints. The average age of groups and gender distributions were similar. The Body Image Scale (BIS) and World Health Organization Quality of Life Scale were applied to all participants, whereas the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids, Turkish Version, was applied only to device users.

RESULTS

A significant difference in body image scores was identified between non device users with hearing loss group and normal hearing group, device users group (HA/CI), and cochlear implant users group. In contrast, no significant difference in body image scores between normal hearing group and the device users group was identified. Finally, a positive correlation between body image scores and quality of life scores in all groups was identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Non-device users with hearing loss have a lower body image and quality of life than those in the other groups, and device usage has a positive effect on body image and quality of life.

Change in Health-Related Quality of Life in Cochlear Implant Recipients in China

Objective

The objective is to assess the benefit of cochlear implants in health-related quality of life among postlingually deaf adults in China.

Methods

Seventy-one postlingually deaf adult cochlear implant users in one cochlear implant center in China participated in this study. The HUI3 questionnaire as a measurement evaluated their quality of life. A cross-sectional analysis was conducted.

Results

Cochlear implant had made statistically significant improvements in quality of life among postlingually deaf adults. The HUI3 scores were significantly better in four attributes (hearing, speech, emotion, and pain) after a cochlear implant. A positive correlation between change in hearing and improvement in emotion was significant. The change in pain and improvement in emotion also had a positive correlation. The duration of HA and CI use had no impact on the gain in HUI3 scores, and the baseline of hearing and emotion state had an influence on HUI3 gain.

Conclusion

This study found cochlear implant users had a greatly improved hearing, speech, emotion, and pain, which made statistically significant improvement in quality of life among postlingually deaf adults. There was a statistically significant association between the change of emotion state and improvement in hearing level. We also found a statistically significant correlation between the reduction of feeling in pain and improvement in emotion. The change of quality of life seemed to be influenced by the primary state of emotion and hearing. We believe the measurement HUI3 is suitable for these patients in China.

Caregiver Quality of Life After Cochlear Implantation in Older Adults

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate factors affecting quality of life (QOL) in caregivers of older cochlear implant (CI) recipients.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional survey.

SETTING

Academic medical center.

PATIENTS

Adults over age 65 receiving CI between July 13, 2000 and April 3, 2019.

INTERVENTIONS

Cochlear implantation.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Linear regression models for caregiver QOL measured by Significant Other Scale for Hearing Disability (SOS-HEAR), with independent variables: caregiver role, patient gender, 11 factor modified frailty index (mFI), duration of hearing loss, hearing aid use, age at surgery, time since surgery, change in pure tone average (PTA), processor input type and Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire (NCIQ). Correlations between SOS-HEAR and patient speech recognition scores.

RESULTS

Questionnaires were mailed to all 294 living CI recipients. Seventy-one caregivers completed the questionnaire. Only patient gender and mFi were significant predictors of caregiver QOL on both univariate (p ≤ 0.001, β= -20.26 [95% confidence interval -30.21, -10.3]; 0.005, -0.72 [-1.20, -0.23], respectively) and multivariate (p = 0.005, β = -20.09, -33.05 to -7.13; 0.003, -0.93 [-1.50, -0.37]) analysis, where caregivers of female patients with lower mFI (better health) had better QOL scores. Caregiver QOL was significantly associated with patient's change in PTA and self-reported QOL scores on univariate (p = 0.041, β = 0.52 [0.08, 0.96]; 0.024, -0.27 [-0.52, -0.02]) but not multivariate analysis. Time since CI was significant only on multivariate analysis (0.041, -0.17 [-0.33, -0.01]). Caregiver QOL did not correlate with patient speech recognition scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Higher QOL scores were found among caregivers of healthier, female CI recipients. Patient hearing measurements did not correspond with better caregiver QOL.

Cross-cultural adaptation of the Nijmegen cochlear implant questionnaire into Turkish language: validity, reliability and effects of demographic variables

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire (Tr-NCIQ) and reveal the demographic factors contributing to the outcomes.

Methods

A group of 118 cochlear implant users aged between 18 and 70 years filled the Tr-NCIQ and the Turkish Hearing Handicapped Inventory for Adults (the Tr-HHI-Adult) via electronic survey. Cross-cultural adaptation of the Tr-NCIQ was performed. The reliability and validity of the questionnaire were evaluated utilizing internal consistency coefficient, split-half method, and predictive validity.

Results

The overall Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of the scale was 0.91, and the Spearman-Brown coefficient was 0.91. A moderately significant and negative correlation was present between the basic sound perception, speech production, self-esteem, activity, and social interactions subdomain scores and the HHI-Adult scores. Patients with post-lingual onset of hearing loss had significantly better results than those with pre-lingual onset, in the advanced sound perception subdomain. In addition, bilateral cochlear implant users had better results than the unilateral and bimodal users in the speech production subdomain and then the bimodal users in the self-esteem subdomain. There was no effect of age, duration of implant use, age at implantation, and the daily usage of cochlear implant (CI) on the quality-of-life outcomes.

Conclusion

The Tr-NCIQ is a reliable and valid tool to evaluate the subjective quality of life in CI users. In addition, as a standardized instrument, it can be easily self-administered both in clinical practice and for research purposes.

The effect of cochlear implantation on autonomy, participation and work in postlingually deafened adults: a scoping review

PURPOSE

This scoping review examines the available evidence on the effect of unilateral cochlear implantation (CI) in adults with postlingual bilateral hearing loss on societal-related outcomes in terms of work, autonomy and participation.

METHODS

Five databases were searched (Pubmed, Web of Science, Embase, PsycINFO and Cochrane Library). Publications were screened in three steps on inclusion criteria. Of the 4230 screened publications, 110 met the inclusion criteria and were assessed for data extraction regarding outcomes "work", "autonomy", "participation". Study characteristics and key findings are presented and narratively described.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven publications were included and categorized into retrospective (n = 3), cross-sectional (n = 18) or prospective (n = 6) study designs. Measurement or identification of number of outcomes (no) were related to work (no = 20), participation (no = 9) and autonomy or independency (no = 10). Most studies indicated benefits of CI on these outcomes. However, some studies did not or indicated additional barriers for benefits. Eleven publications primarily aimed to study one or more of our primary outcomes.

CONCLUSION

In this literature search, scientific databases are reviewed. The results indicate that there is a relatively small body of evidence regarding the effect of CI on the outcomes "work", "autonomy" and "participation". Even though there are some limitations of the current study including some overlap in outcome definitions, most included studies indicate a beneficial effect of CI on work, autonomy and participation. The lack of consensus in definitions and the small body of evidence indicates a need for additional prospective studies investigating the societal outcomes of CI in postlingually deafened adults.

Sustained reduction of tinnitus several years after sequential cochlear implantation

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to explore the short- and long-term effects of a second cochlear implant (CI-2) on the reduction of tinnitus annoyance and tinnitus handicap.

DESIGN

In a combined retrospective and prospective cohort study, tinnitus annoyance was measured before receiving the CI-2 (Pre), more than two years after (Post1) and more than seven years after (Post2), using the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI), the Visual Analog Scale for the assessment of perceived tinnitus loudness (VAS-L) and annoyance (VAS-A), and a self-report questionnaire.

STUDY SAMPLE

Twenty sequentially bilaterally implanted adults with bothersome tinnitus.

RESULTS

CI-2 implantation resulted in a statistically significant reduction of tinnitus handicap from severe at Pre to mild at Post1 (THI mean score reduced from 61.3 [SD = 19.4] to 29.3 [SD = 23.5]). The reduction in tinnitus annoyance was statistically significant from Pre to Post 2 (VAS-A reduced from 7.1 [SD = 1.5] to 3.4 [SD = 2.2]). The reduction in tinnitus loudness was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

The provision of a CI-2 for severely and profoundly hearing-impaired individuals with bothersome tinnitus is an effective method of providing long-term tinnitus relief.

Health-related quality of life in adults with profound postlingual hearing loss before and after cochlear implantation

Purpose

In clinical trials and everyday medical practice, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measures are increasingly being used. That is, in addition to the usual biological health assessment, the impact of disease and treatment on the patient’s functioning in the physical, mental, and social areas is an important parameter. The aim of this study was to assess HRQoL before and after using a cochlear implant (CI) in adults with profound hearing loss.

Methods

There were 104 patients who qualified for the study. All gave informed and free consent. The study involved adults with bilateral hearing loss above 81 dB HL and rated according to the World Health Organization (WHO) classification scheme as having profound hearing loss (which includes deafness). In each participant, the hearing loss was postlingual, that is, it occurred after speech and language had developed. The assessment of quality of life (AQoL-8D) questionnaire was used to assess the health-related quality of life in the study participants.

Results

Quality of life significantly increased (p < 0.001) after cochlear implantation in almost all domains (except the pain dimension). The mean increase in overall quality of life was 0.16, the greatest improvement was found in the dimensions senses (mean change of 0.17) and self-worth (mean change of 0.16).

Conclusion

Cochlear implantation improves the health-related quality of life of the postlingually deaf.

Unilateral Cochlear Implants for Severe, Profound, or Moderate Sloping to Profound Bilateral Sensorineural Hearing Loss: A Systematic Review and Consensus Statements

Importance

Cochlear implants are a treatment option for individuals with severe, profound, or moderate sloping to profound bilateral sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) who receive little or no benefit from hearing aids; however, cochlear implantation in adults is still not routine.

Objective

To develop consensus statements regarding the use of unilateral cochlear implants in adults with severe, profound, or moderate sloping to profound bilateral SNHL.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This study was a modified Delphi consensus process that was informed by a systematic review of the literature and clinical expertise. Searches were conducted in the following databases: (1) MEDLINE In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations and Ovid MEDLINE, (2) Embase, and (3) the Cochrane Library. Consensus statements on cochlear implantation were developed using the evidence identified. This consensus process was relevant for the use of unilateral cochlear implantation in adults with severe, profound, or moderate sloping to profound bilateral SNHL. The literature searches were conducted on July 18, 2018, and the 3-step Delphi consensus method took place over the subsequent 9-month period up to March 30, 2019.

Main Outcomes and Measures

A Delphi consensus panel of 30 international specialists voted on consensus statements about cochlear implantation, informed by an SR of the literature and clinical expertise. This vote resulted in 20 evidence-based consensus statements that are in line with clinical experience. A modified 3-step Delphi consensus method was used to vote on and refine the consensus statements. This method consisted of 2 rounds of email questionnaires and a face-to-face meeting of panel members at the final round. All consensus statements were reviewed, discussed, and finalized at the face-to-face meeting.

Results

In total, 6492 articles were identified in the searches of the electronic databases. After removal of duplicate articles, 74 articles fulfilled all of the inclusion criteria and were used to create the 20 evidence-based consensus statements. These 20 consensus statements on the use of unilateral cochlear implantation in adults with SNHL were relevant to the following 7 key areas of interest: level of awareness of cochlear implantation (1 consensus statement); best practice clinical pathway from diagnosis to surgery (3 consensus statements); best practice guidelines for surgery (2 consensus statements); clinical effectiveness of cochlear implantation (4 consensus statements); factors associated with postimplantation outcomes (4 consensus statements); association between hearing loss and depression, cognition, and dementia (5 consensus statements); and cost implications of cochlear implantation (1 consensus statement).

Conclusions and Relevance

These consensus statements represent the first step toward the development of international guidelines on best practices for cochlear implantation in adults with SNHL. Further research to develop consensus statements for unilateral cochlear implantation in children, bilateral cochlear implantation, combined electric-acoustic stimulation, unilateral cochlear implantation for single-sided deafness, and asymmetrical hearing loss in children and adults may be beneficial for optimizing hearing and quality of life for these patients.

Novel Variants in Hearing Loss Genes and Associations With Audiometric Thresholds in a Multi-ethnic Cohort of US Patients With Cochlear Implants

OBJECTIVES

To investigate novel variants in hearing loss genes and clinical factors affecting audiometric outcomes of cochlear implant (CI) patients.

BACKGROUND

Approximately 50% of hearing loss has a genetic etiology, with certain genetic variants more prevalent in specific ethnic groups. Different variants and some clinical variables including inner ear malformations result in different prognoses or clinical outcomes after CI.

METHODS

Medical and genetic testing records of pediatric CI patients were reviewed for clinical variables. Minor allele frequencies of variants were obtained from Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD) and variants were classified for pathogenicity. Standard statistical testing was done using Fisher's exact, Wilcoxon, and Spearman correlation tests.

RESULTS

Eighteen CI patients with genetic test results had pathogenic variants, including six patients with syndromic hearing loss and six patients with known GJB2 variants. Novel pathogenic variants were noted in CHD7, ADGRV1, and ARID1B, with variants in the latter two genes identified in Hispanic patients. Overall, carriage of genetic variants was associated with better pre-CI audiometric thresholds at 2000 Hz (p = 0.048). On the other hand, post-CI thresholds were significantly worse in patients with inner ear malformations, particularly in patients with atretic cochlear nerve canals.

CONCLUSION

Four novel pathogenic variants were identified, which contributes to knowledge of allelic spectrum for hearing loss especially in Hispanic patients. In this cohort, carriage of pathogenic variants particularly of GJB2 variants was associated with better pre-CI audiometric thresholds, while patients with inner ear malformations had worse post-CI audiometric thresholds.

The cost-effectiveness of Cochlear implants in Swedish adults

BACKGROUND

Research has shown unilateral cochlear implants (CIs) significantly improve clinical outcomes and quality of life in adults. However, only 13% of eligible Swedish adults currently use a unilateral CI. The objective was to estimate the cost-effectiveness of unilateral CIs compared to a hearing aid for Swedish adults with severe to profound hearing loss.

METHODS

A Markov model with a lifetime horizon and six-month cycle length was developed to estimate the benefits and costs of unilateral CIs from the Swedish health system perspective. A treatment pathway was developed through consultation with clinical experts to estimate resource use and costs. Unit costs were derived from the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare and the Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions. Health outcomes were reported in terms of Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs).

RESULTS

Unilateral CIs for Swedish adults with severe to profound hearing loss are likely to be deemed cost-effective when compared to a hearing aid (SEK 140,474 per QALY gained). The results were most sensitive to the age when patients are implanted with a CI and the proportion of patients eligible for CIs after triage.

CONCLUSIONS

An increase in the prevalence of Swedish adults with severe to profound hearing loss is expected as the population ages. Earlier implantation of unilateral CIs improves the cost-effectiveness among people eligible for CIs. Unilateral CIs are an efficacious and cost-effective option to improve hearing and quality of life in Swedish adults with severe to profound hearing loss.

Word Recognition and Frequency Selectivity in Cochlear Implant Simulation: Effect of Channel Interaction

In cochlear implants (CI), spread of neural excitation may produce channel interaction. Channel interaction disturbs the spectral resolution and, among other factors, seems to impair speech recognition, especially in noise. In this study, two tests were performed with 20 adult normal-hearing (NH) subjects under different vocoded simulations. First, there was a measurement of word recognition in noise while varying the number of selected channels (4, 8, 12 or 16 maxima out of 20) and the degree of simulated channel interaction (“Low”, “Medium” and “High”). Then, there was an evaluation of spectral resolution function of the degree of simulated channel interaction, reflected by the sharpness (Q10dB) of psychophysical tuning curves (PTCs). The results showed a significant effect of the simulated channel interaction on word recognition but did not find an effect of the number of selected channels. The intelligibility decreased significantly for the highest degree of channel interaction. Similarly, the highest simulated channel interaction impaired significantly the Q10dB. Additionally, a strong intra-individual correlation between frequency selectivity and word recognition in noise was observed. Lastly, the individual changes in frequency selectivity were positively correlated with the changes in word recognition when the degree of interaction went from “Low” to “High”. To conclude, the degradation seen for the highest degree of channel interaction suggests a threshold effect on frequency selectivity and word recognition. The correlation between frequency selectivity and intelligibility in noise supports the hypothesis that PTCs Q10dB can account for word recognition in certain conditions. Moreover, the individual variations of performances observed among subjects suggest that channel interaction does not have the same effect on each individual. Finally, these results highlight the importance of taking into account subjects’ individuality and to evaluate channel interaction through the speech processor.

Prospective study on health-related quality of life in patients before and after cochlear implantation

Purpose

Assessing cochlear implant (CI)-associated patient outcomes is a focus of implant research. Most studies have analyzed outcomes retrospectively with low patient numbers and few measurement time points. In addition, standardized CI-specific health-related quality of life (HRQoL) instruments have not been used. To address this, we prospectively assessed HRQoL in patients before and after implantation.

Methods

We assessed HRQoL using the Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire (NCIQ), Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB), Hearing Participation Scale (HPS), and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) in 100 deaf or severely hearing-impaired patients (57 unilaterally deaf and 43 bilaterally deaf) before and 3, 6, and 12 months after cochlear implantation. We compared the results of unilaterally and bilaterally hearing-impaired patients and patients with or without a hearing aid. Principal component (PCA) and exploratory factor analyses (EFA) were also conducted.

Results

The NCIQ measured improvements in all 6 domains after CI and correlated well with other QoL instruments. The PCA revealed that the NCIQ can be better explained by physical, physical advanced, and socio-psychological components. The APHAB score ameliorated over time, except for the background noise domain. The overall HPS score improved over time, but the hearing handicap subscore significantly decreased. Sociodemographic influences on the questionnaire scores were relatively weak.

Conclusion

Assessing HRQoL is essential for quantifying the patient outcome after CI. NCIQ scores in our patient cohort showed improved HRQoL in all domains and we recommend that the NCIQ be used as a first-line questionnaire for assessing QoL in hearing-impaired patients after CI.

Role of Preoperative Patient Expectations in Adult Cochlear Implant Outcomes

OBJECTIVE

Preoperative expectations affect patient outcomes in many health conditions, but expectations are rarely assessed in adult cochlear implant (CI) users. This study is a first step in assessing the contribution of preoperative expectations to postoperative CI outcomes, including speech recognition, CI quality of life (CIQOL), and CI satisfaction.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Tertiary medical center.

PATIENTS

Fourty one adult CI patients.

INTERVENTIONS/MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Preoperative expectation questionnaire results, pre- and postoperative speech recognition (CNC and AzBio) scores, postoperative CIQOL domain scores and global scores, and CI satisfaction scores using a visual analog scale (VAS). Cohen's d was used to express effect size.

RESULTS

Overall, patients with lower preoperative CI performance expectations showed higher postoperative QOL. This effect was large for the emotional, entertainment, and social domains (d = 0.85-1.02) of the CIQOL-35 and medium for the communication, listening effort domains, and the Global score (d = 0.55-0.63). Preoperative performance expectations showed minimal associations with preoperative versus postoperative change in CNC (d = -0.26; -0.69-0.18) or AzBio scores (d = -0.28; -0.72-0.15). Determining the extent to which preoperative expectations played a role in postoperative satisfaction with CIs was limited by the clustering of satisfaction scores in the upper range of the scale (VAS mean 81.1).

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides preliminary evidence that patients' expectations before cochlear implantation may influence their postoperative quality of life and other outcomes, but not postoperative speech recognition. This suggests that an increased emphasis should be placed on measuring and counseling expectations in CI candidates. This assumption needs to be confirmed with additional research with larger sample sizes, more sensitive satisfaction measures, and a prospective design.

An evaluation framework for research platforms to advance cochlear implant/hearing aid technology: A case study with CCi-MOBILE

Cochlear implants (CIs) and hearing aids (HAs) are advanced assistive hearing devices that perform sound processing to achieve acoustic to acoustic/electrical stimulation, thus enabling the prospects for hearing restoration and rehabilitation. Since commercial CIs/HAs are typically constrained by manufacturer design/production constraints, it is necessary for researchers to use research platforms (RPs) to advance algorithms and conduct investigational studies with CI/HA subjects. While previous CI/HA research platforms exist, no study has explored establishing a formal evaluation protocol for the operational safety and reliability of RPs. This study proposes a two-phase analysis and evaluation paradigm for RPs. In the acoustic phase 1 step, a signal processing acoustic space is explored in order to present a sampled set of audio input content to explore the safety of the resulting output electric/acoustic stimulation. In the parameter phase 2 step, the configurable space for realizable electrical stimulation pulses is determined, and overall stimulation reliability and safety are evaluated. The proposed protocol is applied and demonstrated using Costakis Cochlear Implant Mobile. Assessment protocol observations, results, and additional best practices for subsampling of the acoustic and parameter test spaces are discussed. The proposed analysis-evaluation protocol establishes a viable framework for assessing RP operational safety and reliability. Guidelines for adapting the proposed protocol to address variability in RP configuration due to experimental factors such as custom algorithms, stimulation techniques, and/or individualization are also considered.

Cochlear Implants and Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Experience With Over 100 Studies Performed With Magnets in Place

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate adverse events and feasibility of performing 1.5-T MRI in patients with cochlear implants (CI) and auditory brainstem implants (ABI).

SETTING

Single tertiary academic referral center.

PATIENTS

CI and ABI recipients undergoing 1.5-T MRI without internal magnet removal.

INTERVENTION(S)

MRI after tight headwrap application.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Adverse events, patient tolerance.

RESULTS

A total of 131 MR studies in 79 patients were performed, with a total of 157 study ears. Sixty-one patients (77%) had unilateral devices. Four patients (5%) underwent MRI with ABI magnets in place. Sixteen patients (20%) had MRI-compatible devices that did not require a head wrap. There were no instances of device stimulation, device malfunction, or excessive heating of the receiver-stimulator package. Magnet tilt requiring manual repositioning occurred during seven studies (4.5%) and magnet displacement requiring operative intervention occurred during seven studies (4.5%). Significant pain where imaging had to be discontinued occurred during three episodes (2%). No adverse events were noted among patients who underwent MRI with an MRI-compatible magnet.

CONCLUSIONS

MRI with CI or ABI magnets in place is associated with a low prevalence of adverse events when performed in a controlled setting. Many partial magnet displacements can be corrected with firm manual pressure. Devices with magnets that align with the field within their housing were not associated with any adverse events and do not require immobilization of the magnet during the scan. These may be valuable in patients with known or anticipated need for MRI.

Sequential Bilateral Cochlear Implantation With Prolonged Time Intervals

Purpose The aim of the study was to assess whether sequential cochlear implantation (CI) with a prolonged interimplant interval (M = 15.2 years) between the first and second CIs benefited speech recognition and health-related quality of life. Method This prospective study included 14 prelingually deafened participants who received their second CI after a prolonged interimplant interval (M = 15.2 years). Additionally, speech recognition ability over a 12-month period of bilateral implant use was investigated. The results of the speech recognition test in both quiet and noisy conditions were statistically analyzed for each CI alone and both CIs together. Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire scores were also collected at activation and at 12 months after activation. Results Improvements in speech recognition ability were observed following the use of the first implant alone and with the use of both implants together; however, progress was much slower with the use of the second implant alone, following its introduction. Furthermore, a significant difference in the trajectory of speech recognition ability was observed between the first and the second implanted ear. According to Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire scores, all participants benefitted from bilateral CI after 12 months. Conclusions Prolonged interimplant intervals resulted in asymmetrical speech recognition abilities. A significant improvement in the speech recognition scores was observed with the first implanted ear, and much slower progress was observed with the second implanted ear. However, the "poorer" second implanted ear could provide a considerable beneficial effect on the improved speech recognition and health-related quality of life with the bilateral CI. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.12861152.

Systematic Review of Quality of Life Assessments after Cochlear Implantation in Older Adults

Cochlear implants (CI) have increasingly been adopted in older adults with severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss as a result of the growing and aging world population. Consequently, researchers have recently shown great interest in the cost-effectiveness of cochlear implantation and its effect on quality of life (QoL) in older CI users. Therefore, a systematic review and critical evaluation of the available literature on QoL in older adult CI users was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies were selected by searching MEDLINE (PubMed) and the Cochrane Library and by checking the reference lists of relevant articles. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) the study sample were adults aged 50 years and older with postlingual onset of bilateral severe to profound hearing loss, (2) all subjects received a multi-electrode CI, and (3) QoL was assessed before and after implantation. Out of 1,093 records, 18 articles were accepted for review. Several studies demonstrated significant positive effects of cochlear implantation on QoL in older adults, but high-level evidence-based medicine is lacking. An improvement of QoL was generally reported when using disease-specific instruments, which are designed to detect treatment-specific changes, whereas the outcomes of generic QoL questionnaires, assessing general health states, were rather ambiguous. However, only generic questionnaires would be able to provide calculations of the cost-effectiveness of CI and comparisons across patient populations, diseases, or interventions. Hence, generic and disease-specific QoL instruments are complementary rather than contradictory. In general, older CI users' QoL was assessed using a variety of methods and instruments, which complicated comparisons between studies. There is a need for a standardized, multidimensional, and comprehensive QoL study protocol including all relevant generic and disease-specific instruments to measure and compare QoL, utility, and/or daily life performance in CI users.

Depressive symptoms affect short- and long-term speech recognition outcome in cochlear implant users

Purpose

To investigate the impact of the amount of depressive symptoms in cochlear implant (CI) recipients on the development of speech recognition after CI-activation up to 2 years.

Design

Retrospective data analysis of a German short form of the Beck Depression Inventory given at initial activation of the implant in relation to monosyllabic word recognition score at conversational level at initial activation and at 3 months, 1 and 2-year follow-up measurements.

Study sample

Thirty-one CI-patients (11 female, 20 male) aged between 41 and 83 (M = 64.77, SD = 10.43) who were German native speakers, postlingually deafened, with severe hearing loss in both sides but unilaterally implanted (19 right-sided, 12 left-sided).

Results

The amount of depressive symptoms at initial activation was negatively correlated with the monosyllabic recognition score after 3 months and after 1 year of implant use.

Conclusion

The psychological status in terms of depressive symptoms is an important parameter regarding the rehabilitative outcome of CI-patients. Care staff and CI-users should be sensitized to the link between depressive symptoms and the development of speech recognition with CI.

Long-term Benefit of Unilateral Cochlear Implantation on Quality of Life and Speech Perception in Bilaterally Deafened Patients

OBJECTIVE

Cochlear implantation (CI) is a common treatment modality for unilaterally and bilaterally deafened patients as well as patients with severe to profound hearing loss. The aim of our study is the complex evaluation of the improvement and influence of health related quality of life (HRQoL) and auditory performance in cochlear implant patients during a long-term follow-up.

METHODS

Sixty-one bilaterally, postlingually deafened patients with unilateral CI were included in this prospective study. Assessment tools for auditory performance and HRQoL included the Freiburg Monosyllabic Speech test, Oldenburg Inventory (OI) questionnaire, Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire (NCIQ) and 36-item Short Form Survey (SF-36). Data were collected before CI, at 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

The assessment tools for speech perception yielded a statistically significant improvement in the Freiburg Monosyllabic Speech test scores and of all subdomain scores of the OI during the 6-month follow-up period. The subdomain scores of the NCIQ and the psychological score of the SF-36 also improved significantly during this follow-up period. All results remained stable thereafter during the 12- and 24-month follow-up. There was a statistically significant correlation between subjective speech perception and HRQoL after CI.

CONCLUSION

This is the first prospective study to show results in regard to speech perception and HRQoL and their correlation during a 2-year follow-up after unilateral CI in bilaterally deafened patients. Our results for speech perception and HRQoL showed a significant improvement during the 6-month follow-up that remained stable thereafter during a 24-month follow-up, even after finishing the hearing rehabilitation program.

Association of Demographic and Hearing-Related Factors With Cochlear Implant-Related Quality of Life

Importance

Only limited evidence is available describing the contribution of patient-related factors to quality of life in adults with cochlear implants.

Objective

Assess the association between demographic, hearing-related, and cochlear implant-related factors and quality of life by using a new Cochlear Implant Quality of Life (CIQOL) item bank, which was developed to meet rigorous psychometric standards.

Design, Setting, and Participants

Multicenter cross-sectional study of adults 18 to 89 years of age who had at least 1 year of cochlear implant use and who were recruited through a consortium of 20 cochlear implant centers in the United States. Using an online format, questionnaires were sent to the first 500 participants who contacted the research team. Of these participants, 371 (74.2%) completed the questionnaire. Demographic, hearing-related, and cochlear implant-related data were obtained along with responses to each of the 81 items in the CIQOL item bank. Multivariable linear regression was used to examine demographic, hearing-related, and cochlear implant-related factors associated with scores in each of the 6 CIQOL domains (communication, emotional, entertainment, environment, listening effort, and social).

Main Outcomes and Measures

Association among demographic, hearing-related, and cochlear implant-related factors and CIQOL scores for each of 6 domains.

Results

Of the 371 participants who completed the questionnaire, 222 (59.8%) were women, and the mean (SD) age was 59.5 (14.9) years. The CIQOL scores were normally distributed across the 6 domains. Being employed, having higher household income, longer duration of hearing loss prior to cochlear implantation, and having bilateral rather than unilateral cochlear implantation were associated with higher CIQOL scores in 1 or more domains, but the effect size varied widely (β, 0.1-6.9). Better sentence recognition ability (using AzBio to measure speech recognition) was associated with only a small positive effect size for the communication (β, 0.0 [95% CI, 0.0-0.1]), entertainment (β, 0.0 [95% CI, 0.0-0.1]), and environmental (β, 0.0 [95% CI, 0.0-0.0]) domains. Increased age was associated with lower CIQOL in the entertainment domain (β, -0.3 [95% CI, -1.5 to -0.4]). The demographic, hearing-related, and cochlear implant-related factors included in the multivariable regression models accounted for only a small percentage of the variance in CIQOL domain scores (R2, 0.08-0.17).

Conclusions and Relevance

Several factors were found to predict higher or lower CIQOL scores in specific domains, with speech-recognition ability having only a minimal association. Despite evaluating a large number of demographic, hearing-related, and cochlear implant-related factors, the multivariable models accounted for only a small amount of CIQOL variance. This suggests that patient or other characteristics that contribute to cochlear implant-related quality of life remain largely unknown.

Long-term audiologic outcomes after cochlear implantation for single-sided deafness

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the long-term audiometric outcomes, sound localization abilities, binaural benefits, and tinnitus assessment of subjects with cochlear implant (CI) after a diagnosis of unilateral severe-to-profound hearing loss.

METHOD

The study group consisted of 60 (mean age 52 years, range 19-84) subjects with profound hearing loss in one ear and normal to near-normal hearing in the other ear who underwent CI. Data analysis included pre- and postoperative Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant (CNC) Word scores, AzBio Sentence scores, pure tone thresholds, sound localization, and Iowa Tinnitus Handicap Questionnaire scores.

RESULTS

Preoperative average duration of deafness was 3.69 years (standard deviation 4.31), with an average follow-up time of 37.9 months (range 1-87). CNC and AzBio scores significantly improved (both P < 0.001) postoperatively among the entire cohort, and there was much heterogeneity in outcomes with respect to deafness etiology subgroup analysis. Sound localization abilities tended to improve longitudinally in the entire cohort. Binaural benefits using an adaptive Hearing in Noise Test test showed a significant (P < 0.001) improvement with head shadow effect. Utilizing the Iowa Tinnitus Handicap Questionnaire, there was significant improvement in social, physical, and emotional well-being (P = 0.011), along with hearing abilities (P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This case series is the largest cohort of CI SSD subjects to date and systematically analyzes their functional outcomes. Subjects have meaningful improvement in word understanding, and sound localization tends to gradually improve over time. Binaural benefit analysis showed significant improvement with head shadow effect, which likely provides ease of listening.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 Laryngoscope, 130:1805-1811, 2020.

The Effect of Cochlear Implants on Cognitive Function in Older Adults: Initial Baseline and 18-Month Follow Up Results for a Prospective International Longitudinal Study

In older adults, hearing loss is independently associated with an increased rate of cognitive decline, and has been identified to be a modifiable risk factor for dementia. The mechanism underlying the cognitive decline associated with hearing loss is not understood, but it is known that the greater the hearing loss, the faster the rate of decline. It is unknown whether remediation of hearing loss with hearing devices can delay cognitive decline. This 5-year international longitudinal study is investigating the impact of cochlear implants on cognitive function in older people with severe-profound hearing loss, and whether remediation of hearing loss could delay the onset of cognitive impairment. This is the first study to examine the major primary risk factors associated with dementia in the same cohort. Participants were assessed before cochlear implantation and 18 months later using an identical battery including a visually presented cognitive assessment tool (Cogstate battery) that is highly sensitive to small changes in cognition and suitable for use with people with hearing loss. Hearing and speech perception ability were assessed in sound-treated conditions by an audiologist, and a range of questionnaire tools was administered to assess self-perceived ease of listening, quality of life, physical activity, diet, social and emotional loneliness, isolation, anxiety, and depression. A detailed medical health history was taken. Pre-operatively, despite the small initial sample size (n = 59), increased hearing loss and age predicted significantly poorer executive function and visual attention, while tertiary education predicted better executive function. Better self-reported quality of life was correlated with better visual learning performance, and engaging in frequent vigorous physical activity was correlated with poorer visual learning performance. At 18 months, for the first 20 participants, significant benefits of cochlear implants were seen in terms of speech perception, communication ability, and quality of life. Multiple linear regression modeling showed executive function improved significantly for non-tertiary educated males, while cognitive function remained stable for other participants. Further follow-up at 18 month intervals with a larger sample will reveal the effects of cochlear implant intervention on all outcomes, and whether this can delay cognitive decline.

[Quality of life and depression in hearing-impairment : A German survey]

BACKGROUND

Hearing-impairment can lead to a reduced quality of life and thus represents a vulnerability factor for mental disorders.

OBJECTIVE

This study represents the first psychiatric analysis of subjective quality of life and depression in people with hearing-impairment in Germany.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The patient group included 30 hearing-impaired participants (27 women, 3 men) with a current or previous mental disorder and/or psychiatric/psychotherapeutic treatment (age: mean, M = 49.67 years; standard deviation, SD = 13.54 years). The control group consisted of 22 hearing-impaired participants (16 women, 6 men) without mental disorders or treatment (age: M = 52.41 years, SD = 17.30 years). Besides sociodemographic variables, we registered onset/extent of the various hearing-impairments and hearing aid provision. Both groups underwent extensive diagnostic assessment comprising subjective functional impairment (Sheehan Disability Scale, SDS), health-related quality of life (SF-36 Health Survey), and depressive symptoms (Beck Depression Inventory, BDI-II).

RESULTS

Groups did not differ significantly in terms of sociodemographic variables such as age, gender, or intelligence. Participants of the patient group had a significantly greater subjective impairment, a lower quality of life, and more pronounced symptoms of depression. The invasiveness of the hearing aid (i. e., cochlear implant) as well as the timepoint of hearing-impairment onset (postlingually) appear to serve as vulnerability factors for mental health problems in this group.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate that besides delivering high-quality acoustic care, practitioners should continuously check patients' requirements for psychosocial treatment due to a loss of quality of life. The development of a specific psychotherapeutic treatment for hearing-impaired clients requires additional research focused on protective and vulnerability factors which may influence the emergence of mental disorders in these patients.

Auditory synaptopathy, auditory neuropathy, and cochlear implantation

Cochlear implantation has become the standard-of-care for adults and children with severe to profound hearing loss. There is growing evidence that qualitative as well as quantitative deficits in the auditory nerve may affect cochlear implant (CI) outcomes. Auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder (ANSD) is characterized by dysfunctional transmission of sound from the cochlea to the brain due to defective synaptic function or neural conduction. In this review, we examine the precise mechanisms of genetic lesions causing ANSD and the effect of these lesions on CI outcomes. Reviewed data show that individuals with lesions that primarily affect the cochlear sensory system and the synapse, which are bypassed by the CI, have optimal CI outcomes. Individuals with lesions that affect the auditory nerve show poor performance with CIs, likely because neural transmission of the electrical signal from the CI is affected. We put forth a nuanced molecular classification of ANSD that has implications for preoperative counseling for patients with this disorder prior to cochlear implantation. We propose that description of ANSD patients should be based on the molecular site of lesion typically derived from genetic evaluation (synaptopathy vs. neuropathy) as this has implications for expected CI outcomes. Improvements in our understanding of genetic site of lesions and their effects on CI function should lead to better CI outcomes, not just for individuals with auditory neuropathy, but all individuals with hearing loss.

Categories of Auditory Performance and Speech Intelligibility Ratings in Prelingually Deaf Children With Bilateral Implantation

Purpose The aim of the current study was to review all pediatric cases with congenital deafness who underwent bilateral implantation in our center. Specifically, auditory performance and speech intelligibility ratings were compared across children based on their mode of bilateral stimulation (simultaneous or sequential implantation). Method A retrospective chart review design was used in this study. A total of 46 congenitally deaf children were included. Children ranged in age between 2 and 8 years, with a mean of 3 years 7 months. Participants were divided into 2 groups: those who received their bilateral implant simultaneously and those who received them sequentially. Categories of Auditory Performance (CAP; Archbold, Lutman, & Marshall, 1995 ) scores and Speech Intelligibility Rating (SIR; M. C. Allen, Nikolopoulos, & O'Donoghue, 1998 ) scores were used to measure their performance. Results Children scored an average of 4.1 (±1.6) on the CAP Scale and 1.6 (±1) on the SIR Scale. Results showed that children who received their implants simultaneously scored relatively higher on the CAP Scale than those with sequential implants. However, there were no differences between the 2 groups in SIR scores. These 2 outcome measures were not correlated with age at implantation. Conclusion The current study demonstrated that simultaneous implantation could potentially improve audiologic outcome.

Meta-analysis of quality-of-life improvement after cochlear implantation and associations with speech recognition abilities

OBJECTIVES

Determine the impact of cochlear implantation on quality of life (QOL) and determine the correlation between QOL and speech recognition ability.

STUDY DESIGN

Two authors independently searched PubMed, Medline, Scopus, and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature to identify studies reporting hearing-specific or cochlear implant (CI)-specific QOL outcomes before and after cochlear implantation, and studies reporting correlations between QOL and speech recognition after cochlear implantation. Data from the included articles were obtained independently by two authors. Standardized mean difference (SMD) for each measure and pooled effects were determined to assess improvement in QOL before and after cochlear implantation.

RESULTS

From 14 articles with 679 CI patients who met the inclusion criteria, pooled analyses of all hearing-specific QOL measures revealed a very strong improvement in QOL after cochlear implantation (SMD = 1.77). Subset analysis of CI-specific QOL measures also showed very strong improvement (SMD = 1.69). Thirteen articles with 715 patients met the criteria to evaluate associations between QOL and speech recognition. Pooled analyses showed a low positive correlation between hearing-specific QOL and word recognition in quiet (r = 0.213), sentence recognition in quiet (r = 0.241), and sentence recognition in noise (r = 0.238). Subset analysis of CI-specific QOL showed similarly low positive correlations with word recognition in quiet (r = 0.213), word recognition in noise (r = 0.241), and sentence recognition in noise (r = 0.255).

CONCLUSIONS

Using hearing-specific and CI-specific measures of QOL, patients report significantly improved QOL after cochlear implantation. However, widely used clinical measures of speech recognition are poor predictors of patient-reported QOL with CIs. Laryngoscope, 128:982-990, 2018.

Quality of life and speech perception in two late deafened adults with cochlear implants

The aim was to demonstrate the need for a quality of life assessment in biopsychosocial aural rehabilitation (AR) practices with late deafened adults (LDAs) with cochlear implants (CIs). We present a case report of a medical records review of two LDAs enrolled in a biopsychosocial group AR program. A speech perception test Contrasts for Auditory and Speech Training (CAST) and a quality of life (QoL) assessment the Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire (NCIQ) were given prior to AR therapy. CAST scores indicated both patients had excellent basic speech perception. However, NCIQ results revealed patients' difficulties in basic and advanced listening settings. NCIQ highlighted patients' self-perceived poor self-esteem and ongoing challenges to their QoL. Speech perception testing results alone are not enough to document the daily challenges of QoL needs of LDAs with CIs. The inclusion of a QoL measure such as the NCIQ is vital in evaluating outcomes of cochlear implantation in LDAs.

Effect of Cochlear Implantation on Quality of Life in Adults with Unilateral Hearing Loss

Objective: Patients with moderate-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss in 1 ear and normal hearing in the contralateral ear, known as unilateral hearing loss (UHL) or single-sided deafness (SSD), may experience improved quality of life with the use of a cochlear implant (CI) in the affected ear. Quality of life assessment before and after implantation may reveal changes to aspects of hearing beyond those explicitly evaluated with behavioral measures. Methods: The present report completed 2 experiments investigating quality of life outcomes in CI recipients with UHL. The first experiment assessed quality of life during the 1st year of device use with 3 questionnaires: the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ), the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB), and the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory. Twenty subjects were evaluated preoperatively and 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months post-activation. Quality of life results were compared over the study period using traditional scoring methods and the SSQ pragmatic subscales. Subscales specific to localization and speech perception in noise were compared to behavioral measures at the preoperative and 12-month intervals. The 2nd experiment evaluated quality of life preoperatively and at the 12-month interval for CI recipients with UHL and CI recipients with bilateral hearing loss, including conventional CI users and those listening with electric-acoustic stimulation (EAS). The 3 cohorts differed in CI candidacy criteria, including the amount of residual hearing in the contralateral ear. Results: For subjects with moderate-to-profound UHL, receipt of a CI significantly improved quality of life, with benefits noted as early as 1 month after initial activation. The UHL cohort reported less perceived difficulty at the pre- and postoperative intervals than the conventional CI and EAS cohorts, which may be due to the presence of the normal-hearing ear. Each group experienced a significant benefit in quality of life on the APHAB with CI use. Conclusions: Cochlear implantation in cases of substantial UHL may offer significant improvements in quality of life. Quality of life measures revealed a reduction in perceived tinnitus severity and subjective improvements in speech perception in noise, spatial hearing, and listening effort. While self-report of difficulties were lower for the UHL cohort than the conventional CI and EAS cohorts, subjects in all 3 groups reported an improvement in quality of life with CI use.

Meta-analysis of Cochlear Implantation Outcomes Evaluated With General Health-related Patient-reported Outcome Measures

OBJECTIVE

Determine the change in general health-related quality of life (HRQOL) after cochlear implantation and association with speech recognition.

STUDY DESIGN

Meta-analysis.

METHODS

Search was performed following the PRISMA statement using PubMed, Medline, Scopus, and CINAHL. Studies on adult cochlear implant (CI) patients measuring HRQOL before and after cochlear implantation were included. Standardized mean difference (SMD) for each measure and pooled effects were determined. A meta-analysis of correlations was also performed between all non-disease-specific patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and speech recognition after cochlear implantation.

RESULTS

Twenty-two articles met criteria for meta-analysis of HRQOL improvement, but 15 (65%) were excluded due to incomplete statistical reporting. From the seven articles with 274 CI patients that met inclusion criteria, pooled analyses showed a medium positive effect of cochlear implantation on HRQOL (SMD = 0.79). Subset analysis of the HUI-3 measure showed a large effect (SMD = 0.84). Nine articles with 550 CI patients met inclusion criteria for meta-analysis of correlations between non-disease specific PROMs and speech recognition after cochlear implantation. Pooled analysis showed a low correlation between non-disease-specific PROMs and word recognition in quiet (r = 0.35), sentence recognition in quiet (r = 0.40), and sentence recognition in noise (r = 0.32).

CONCLUSION

Although regularly used, HRQOL measures are not intended to measure nor do they accurately reflect the complex difficulties facing CI patients. Only a medium positive effect of cochlear implantation on HRQOL was observed along with a low correlation between non-disease-specific PROMs and speech recognition. The use of such instruments in this population may underestimate the benefit of cochlear implantation.

Quality of Life and Cost-Effectiveness of Cochlear Implants: A Narrative Review

OBJECTIVES

To review evidence regarding the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and cost-effectiveness of unilateral and bilateral cochlear implantation (CI) among children and adults with severe-to-profound hearing loss.

STUDY DESIGN

Narrative review.

METHODS

Publications related to quality of life (QoL) and costs of care in CI were acquired through searches in English-language databases. Studies were included if they had identified the HRQoL attainment, cost of care, cost-utility, or cost-effectiveness associated with CI.

RESULTS

57 studies were critically reviewed. The QoL outcome metrics used in these articles were divided into 2 categories - generic and condition specific. In studies investigating children, many reported no significant difference in QoL attainment between CI recipients and normal-hearing peers. In adults, significant improvements in QoL after implantation and higher QoL than in their nonimplanted (hearing-aided) peers were frequently reported. Studies involving an older adult cohort reported significant improvement in QoL after implantation, which was often independent of audiological performance. Overall, the calculated cost-utility ratios consistently met the threshold of cost acceptance, indicating acceptable values for expenditures on CI.

CONCLUSIONS

Considerable work has been done on the QoL attainment and health economic implications of CI. Unilateral CI across all age groups leads to reported sustained benefits in the recipients' overall and disease-specific QoL. With increased cost associated with bilateral CI, further study is needed to characterize its costs and benefits with respect to the recipients' health, well-being, and contributions to society.

Genetic variants in the peripheral auditory system significantly affect adult cochlear implant performance

BACKGROUND

Cochlear implantation is an effective habilitation modality for adults with significant hearing loss. However, post-implant performance is variable. A portion of this variance in outcome can be attributed to clinical factors. Recent physiological studies suggest that the health of the spiral ganglion also impacts post-operative cochlear implant outcomes. The goal of this study was to determine whether genetic factors affecting spiral ganglion neurons may be associated with cochlear implant performance.

METHODS

Adults with post-lingual deafness who underwent cochlear implantation at the University of Iowa were studied. Pre-implantation evaluation included comprehensive genetic testing for genetic diagnosis. A novel score of genetic variants affecting genes with functional effects in the spiral ganglion was calculated. A Z-scored average of up to three post-operative speech perception tests (CNC, HINT, and AzBio) was used to assess outcome.

RESULTS

Genetically determined spiral ganglion health affects cochlear implant outcomes, and when considered in conjunction with clinically determined etiology of deafness, accounts for 18.3% of the variance in postoperative speech recognition outcomes. Cochlear implant recipients with deleterious genetic variants that affect the cochlear sensory organ perform significantly better on tests of speech perception than recipients with deleterious genetic variants that affect the spiral ganglion.

CONCLUSION

Etiological diagnosis of deafness including genetic testing is the single largest predictor of postoperative speech outcomes in adult cochlear implant recipients. A detailed understanding of the genetic underpinning of hearing loss will better inform pre-implant counseling. The method presented here should serve as a guide for further research into the molecular physiology of the peripheral auditory system and cochlear implants.

Quality of life in adult cochlear implant users

Objective To evaluate the quality of life (QOL) of adult cochlear implant users (CI) and compare it with the QOL of adults with normal hearing; and study the influence of the variables socioeconomic status, education, age at assessment, auditory sensory deprivation time, device usage time and performance in auditory speech perception tests in the QOL of adult cochlear implant users. Design The QOL was assessed using the World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL-BREF) generic assessment questionnaire. Study sample Seventy adult CI users formed the experimental group (EG) and 50 adults with normal hearing formed the control group (CG). Results The EG scores were close to the maximum score in satisfactory quality of life for all domains of the WHOQOL-BREF and there were similar results between the EG and CG. The variables age at assessment, duration of auditory sensory deprivation, duration of CI use and performance in auditory speech perception did not influence the results of the QOL of adult cochlear implant users. Conclusion Evaluating the QOL should be a concern of interdisciplinary teams in CI for an intervention with humanized care.

Evaluation on health-related quality of life in deaf children with cochlear implant in China

OBJECTIVE

Previous studies have shown that deaf children benefit considerably from cochlear implants. These improvements are found in areas such as speech perception, speech production, and audiology-verbal performance. Despite the increasing prevalence of cochlear implants in China, few studies have reported on health-related quality of life in children with cochlear implants. The main objective of this study was to explore health-related quality of life on children with cochlear implants in South-west China.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective observational study of 213 CI users in Southwest China between 2010 and 2013.

METHODS

Participants were 213 individuals with bilateral severe-to-profound hearing loss who wore unilateral cochlear implants. The Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire and Health Utility Index Mark III were used pre-implantation and 1 year post-implantation. Additionally, 1-year postoperative scores for Mandarin speech perception were compared with preoperative scores.

RESULTS

Health-related quality of life improved post-operation with scores on the Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire improving significantly in all subdomains, and the Health Utility Index 3 showing a significant improvement in the utility score and the subdomains of ''hearing," ''speech," and "emotion". Additionally, a significant improvement in speech recognition scores was found. No significant correlation was found between increased in quality of life and speech perception scores.

CONCLUSION

Health-related quality of life and speech recognition in prelingual deaf children significantly improved post-operation. The lack of correlation between quality of life and speech perception suggests that when evaluating performance post-implantation in prelingual deaf children and adolescents, measures of both speech perception and quality of life should be used.

Cochlear implantation and quality of life in postlingually deaf adults: Long-term follow-up

Objective

To investigate long-term quality of life (QoL) in postlingually deaf adults after entering the cochlear implantation (CI) program.

Study Design and Setting

Follow-up study from 1998 onwards in tertiary university medical center. Long-term CI users, patients who have not received a CI, and relatively short-term CI users were re-evaluated six years after initial data collection in 1998 by using three questionnaires (NCIQ, HUI3, and SF36) and speech perception tests.

Results and Conclusions

In general, the beneficial effect of CI remained stable during long-term follow-up, though scores on the questionnaires decreased slightly. Outcomes before and after cochlear implantation were significantly different. The group without a CI demonstrated slightly decreasing trends in outcomes. Long-term speech perception performance improved in time.

Significance

This is the first study to investigate long-term follow-up of CI patients, in all aspects of QoL combined with speech perception performance, in comparison with postlingually deaf adults without CI.