Comparison between a screen-film system and a selenium radiography system. An ROC study using simulated thoracic lesions

Evaluation of Lossy data compression of chest X-rays: a receiver operating characteristic study

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the quality of chest radiographs after 32:1 compression/decompression with different image compression algorithms.

METHODS

Ten digital (Thoravison) radiographs of an anthropomorphic chest phantom with superimposed simulated nodular lesions (NL) and linear reticular lesions (LL) were obtained. Each radiograph was subdivided into 15 fields; they contained the lesions with a probability of 0.5. The radiographs were compressed and decompressed by using JPEG, fractal and wavelet algorithms at a compression rate of 32:1. Five radiologists evaluated the images. Data were analyzed with the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) method (comparison of area under curve).

RESULTS

At 32:1 JPEG or wavelet compression, no statistically significant difference was observed for both NL and LL when compared with the original images. The fractal algorithm performed significantly lower for both NL and LL when compared with the original radiographs.

CONCLUSION

The JPEG and wavelet image compression does not result in loss of relevant information for chest x-rays at a compression rate of 32:1.

Detection of pulmonary edema in pigs: storage phosphor versus amorphous selenium-based flat-panel-detector radiography

PURPOSE

To compare diagnostic accuracy of soft-copy selenium-based digital radiographic images and soft-copy computed radiographic images obtained for detection of pulmonary edema in pigs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Oleic acid was injected intraatrially into three pigs (weight, 20-25 kg) at doses of 0.04, 0.05, and 0.06 mL/kg to induce pulmonary edema. Thirty-seven sets of computed radiographic, digital radiographic, and thin-section computed tomographic (CT) scans were obtained every 20-30 minutes in three pigs over 4-6 hours. Images were masked for identity, randomly sorted, and displayed on a monitor. Four radiologists rated each image for presence of parenchymal opacities by using a dichotomous scoring system in two sessions. Presence of pulmonary edema was determined with thin-section CT and a severity scale. Intra- and interobserver variations were determined with the kappa statistic and the Z test and with the Cochran Q test and the McNemar test, respectively. True-positive, true-negative, false-positive, and false-negative rates were determined. McNemar test was used to determine statistical significance of differences in detection between computed and digital radiographic images.

RESULTS

There was no significant intra- or interobserver variation, except for one pair of observers during the first interpretative session with computed radiographic images (P =.016, McNemar test). Overall sensitivity (92.1%) and diagnostic accuracy (90.2%) of digital radiography were significantly higher than those of computed radiography (79.6% and 83.4%, respectively) (P <.001 for sensitivity, P =.01 for diagnostic accuracy, McNemar test). In detection of minimal and mild pulmonary edema, sensitivity of digital radiography (84%) was significantly higher than that of computed radiography (58%) (P <.001).

CONCLUSION

Soft-copy digital radiographic images are superior to soft-copy computed radiographic images obtained for detection of mild pulmonary edema in pigs.

Digital radiography versus conventional radiography in chest imaging: diagnostic performance of a large-area silicon flat-panel detector in a clinical CT-controlled study

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to compare the diagnostic performance of a digital large-area silicon flat-panel detector with that of a conventional screen-film system in clinical chest imaging using abnormal findings documented by CT as the reference standard.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Eighty patients (46 men and 34 women; age range,18-91 years; mean age, 63 years) who underwent CT of the chest were examined with the new digital radiography system, which is based on a 43 x 43 cm silicon flat-panel detector, and with a conventional screen-film system, which is used routinely in clinical practice. Posteroanterior and lateral radiographs were obtained. Four radiologists analyzed the digital and conventional images separately for chest abnormalities and rated the images using a five-level scale of confidence; CT was used as the reference standard. Diagnostic value was assessed using receiver operating characteristic curves for each abnormality.

RESULTS

No significant differences were found between the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the digital and that of the conventional radiography method for almost all investigated criteria. The only exception was mediastinal abnormalities, for which the digital method provided better results than the conventional method (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The diagnostic performance of the new large-area silicon flat-panel detector is equivalent or superior to that of the conventional screen-film system for clinical chest imaging and can replace conventional radiography systems. This new technology offers transmission and storage possibilities inherent to digital radiology that would facilitate daily practice and reduce the initial high costs in the long-term.

Pelvic imaging with a selenium-based detector (Thoravision). Comparison with screen-film radiography in 75 patients

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether the selenium detector (Thoravision) provides sufficient diagnostic confidence in digital pelvic imaging compared with a conventional screen-film combination.

METHODS

In 75 patients, pelvic imaging with conventional screen-film and isodose selenium radiography using a dedicated postprocessing mode was compared independently by three radiologists. The depiction of cortical and cancellous bone was evaluated in the iliac wings, sacral and pubic bones, acetabulum, femoral head, and trochanter. Demarcation of soft tissue was assessed in the iliac and trochanteric region.

RESULTS

Visualization of cortical bone and soft tissue in the iliac area as well as soft tissue and cortical and cancellous bone in the trochanteric region was significantly superior with the selenium detector. However, conventional imaging was better in the trabecular bone of the sacral region, where results with the selenium system were particularly poor.

CONCLUSIONS

The selenium detector (Thoravision) is advantageous in imaging soft tissue adjacent to the iliac wings and the trochanter, but results for the cancellous sacral bone are poor. Further modifications of postprocessing modes may lead to improved depiction of this critical pelvic area.