Interaction between olanzapine and haloperidol

Assessment of potential drug interactions among psychiatric inpatients receiving antipsychotic therapy of a secondary care hospital, United Arab Emirates

The majority of the antipsychotic drugs are also known to interact with other co-administered drugs. Drug-drug interaction (DDI) reports among patients receiving antipsychotic medications are common. The study aims to identify the potential drug-drug, drug-tobacco, and drug-ethanol interactions associated with antipsychotics and significant predictors of potential DDIs (pDDIs). A prospective observational study was conducted among psychiatric inpatients receiving antipsychotic therapy and met the inclusion criteria that were reviewed for the presence of pDDIs using DRUGDEX-Micromedex database 2.0. The identified pDDIs were graded according to the severity and type of documentation. A total of 110 patients had a minimum of a single interaction, and the overall frequency of pDDIs reported was 64.7%. Of 158 pDDIs, 92 interactions (58.2%) were of major severity, while 66 interactions were of moderate severity (41.8%). Olanzapine with valproate (40 [25.3%]) was the most commonly documented pDDIs, followed by risperidone with valproate (20 [12.6%]). Olanzapine with tobacco (20 [69%]) was the most common drug-tobacco interaction. Simultaneously, olanzapine with ethanol was the most common potential drug and ethanol interaction (9 [50%]). Variables such as the number of drugs and polypharmacy statistically significantly predicted pDDIs (F[7, 162] = 8.155, P < 0.05, R² = 0.26). Knowing the severity of different pDDIs will help clinicians and prescribers monitor patient safety through regular monitoring for interactions and adverse drug effects in future. The number of medications and polypharmacy was found to be the most significant predictor of pDDIs.

Fatalities associated with therapeutic use and overdose of atypical antipsychotics

Since 1989, several novel antipsychotic drugs have become available for use including clozapine, risperidone, olanzapine, quetiapine and ziprasidone. These agents represent a substantial improvement in the treatment of schizophrenia and related disorders and are considered to have a favourable adverse effect profile relative to traditional antipsychotics. Nonetheless, in rare cases, people have died as a result of taking atypical antipsychotic drugs at therapeutic and supratherapeutic doses. Toxic doses of atypical antipsychotics are highly variable: some patients have died while taking therapeutic doses and others have survived massive overdoses. Toxicity may be increased by coingestion of other agents, particularly drugs with similar metabolic pathways. Atypical antipsychotics are metabolised predominantly by cytochrome p450 (CYP) isoenzymes, particularly CYP1A2 (clozapine and olanzapine), CYP3A4 (clozapine, quetiapine and ziprasidone) and CYP2D6 (olanzapine and risperidone). Concurrent prescription of other drugs that inhibit these isoenzymes may increase the probability of adverse events in patients taking atypical antipsychotics. Deaths due to atypical antipsychotic toxicity are often related to cardiovascular complications, but pulmonary, neurological, endocrine and gastrointestinal complications have also caused fatalities. Prevention and management of atypical antipsychotic overdose are of increased clinical relevance as prescription of these drugs increases.

Role of the smoking-induced cytochrome P450 (CYP)1A2 and polymorphic CYP2D6 in steady-state concentration of olanzapine

This study investigated whether the smokinginducible cytochrome P450 (CYP) 1A2 and the polymorphic CYP2D6 play significant roles in the metabolism of olanzapine and its clinical effects at steady-state treatment. Caffeine and debrisoquine were used as measures of CYP1A2 and CYP2D6, respectively. After drug therapy for 15 days, the effect of olanzapine on the activities of CYP1A2 and CYP2D6 was also examined. Seventeen psychiatric patients (9 men and 8 women) were orally administered olanzapine, at a mean +/- standard deviation (SD) dosage of 10 mg/d for all smokers (n = 8) and 7.5 +/- 2.5 mg/d (range, 5-10 mg) for nonsmokers (n = 9;p <0.01). The plasma concentration-to-dose (C:D) ratio was closely correlated to the CYP1A2 activity ( s = -0.89;p <0.0001). The mean urinary caffeine indexes of nonsmokers and smokers were 17 +/- 8 and 101 +/- 44, respectively, indicating that smoking had induced a sixfold higher CYP1A2 activity (p <0.0001). Likewise, the olanzapine plasma C:D ratio (ng.mL.mg) was about fivefold lower in smokers (7.9 +/- 2.6) than in nonsmokers (1.56 +/- 1.1;p <0.0001). On day 15 of the antipsychotic therapy, the percentage decrease in Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) total score relative to the predosing score (in the drug-free period) was higher for nonsmokers than for smokers (30.4 +/- 10% vs. 12.5 +/- 14%;p <0.01). Six nonsmokers and three smokers experienced side effects with olanzapine. After 15 days of drug treatment, olanzapine had caused significant (p <0.0001) and substantial CYP1A2 inhibition (by 50%) in comparison with predosing values, and such inhibition can contribute to adverse drug interactions. In conclusion, smoking-induced increased CYP1A2 activity significantly diminished plasma olanzapine concentrations and the antipsychotic effect of the drug. The performance of a simple caffeine test may assist in individualization of the olanzapine dosage.

Antipsychotic combination therapy in schizophrenia. A review of efficacy and risks of current combinations

OBJECTIVE

To review the literature on efficacy and risks of combining antipsychotics (atypical with atypical or conventional) and suggest a rationale and strategies for future clinical trials.

METHOD

A computerized Medline search supplemented by an examination of cross-references and reviews was performed.

RESULTS

Empirical evidence for the efficacy of combining antipsychotics is too limited to draw firm conclusions. The practice of augmenting clozapine with more 'tightly bound' D2 receptor antagonists as exemplified by risperidone augmentation of clozapine has some empirical and theoretical support. The risks of augmentation strategies have not been studied systematically. No study has examined the economic impact of combination treatment.

CONCLUSION

Further trials of antipsychotic combination therapies are needed before this currently unsupported practice can be recommended. Rationales for combination treatment include a broadening of the range of receptor activity or an increase in D2 receptor occupancy with certain atypical agents. Trial methodology needs to take into account subject characteristics, duration of treatment, optimization of monotherapy comparators, and appropriate outcome measures.

Olanzapine: a review of its use in the treatment of bipolar I disorder

Olanzapine, a thienobenzodiazepine derivative, is a psychotropic agent that has shown efficacy in the treatment of patients with bipolar I disorder. Olanzapine has a multireceptorial binding profile including a greater affinity for serotonin 5-HT(2A) than for dopamine D(2) receptors. Olanzapine 5 to 20 mg/day demonstrated significantly greater antimanic efficacy than placebo in two double-blind, randomised 3- or 4-week trials of patients with bipolar I disorder of either manic or mixed episodes, with or without psychotic features. Additionally, in one of these trials, improvements in cognitive function and hostility were superior with olanzapine. In cohorts of severely depressed and rapid cycling patients, improvements in manic and depressive symptoms and in manic symptoms only, were superior with olanzapine compared with placebo. Significant improvements from baseline in symptoms of mania, depression, cognitive functioning and hostility were seen with olanzapine in a 49-week extension phase study. In double-blind trials, olanzapine 10 mg/day appeared to have similar antimanic efficacy to oral lithium 400mg twice daily in the treatment of patients with pure mania (4-week small study). In patients with acute manic or mixed episodes olanzapine 5 to 20 mg/day appeared to be more effective than oral valproate semisodium (divalproex sodium) 500 to 2500 mg/day (3-week study) and at least as effective as oral haloperidol 3 to 15 mg/day (12-week study). Preliminary results from a large 6-week placebo-controlled study suggest that olanzapine 5 to 20 mg/day in combination with mood stabilisers (lithium or valproate semisodium) provides effective augmentation of antimanic treatment of patients with bipolar I disorder, with benefits seen in the first week. Adverse events reported significantly more often with olanzapine than with placebo were somnolence, dry mouth, dizziness and bodyweight gain, and in comparison with valproate semisodium were somnolence, dry mouth, increased appetite and bodyweight gain. Olanzapine was generally well tolerated with no clinically relevant abnormalities in laboratory tests, vital signs or electrocardiogram results.

CONCLUSION

Olanzapine demonstrated superior efficacy compared with placebo in the short-term treatment of patients with bipolar I disorder with manic or mixed episodes, with or without psychotic features, and was generally well tolerated. According to preliminary data the antimanic efficacy of olanzapine appears similar to that of haloperidol and better than that of valproate semisodium in patients with bipolar I disorder experiencing a manic or mixed episode; among nonpsychotic patients with manic or mixed episodes olanzapine appears to be superior to haloperidol. Available data support the choice of olanzapine as an option in the short-term management of mania in patients with bipolar I disorder with manic or mixed episodes, with or without psychotic features.

Drug glucuronidation in clinical psychopharmacology

Glucuronidation is a phase II metabolic process and one of the most common pathways in the formation of hydrophilic drug metabolites. At least 33 families of uridine diphosphate-glucuronosyltransferases have been identified in vitro, and specific nomenclature similar to that used to classify the cytochrome (CYP) P450 system has been established. The UGT1 and UGT2 subfamilies represent the most important of these enzymes in human drug metabolism. Factors affecting glucuronidation include the following: cigarette smoking, obesity, age, and gender. In addition, several drugs have been found in vitro to be substrates, inhibitors, or inducers of UGT enzymes. Induction or inhibition of both UGT and CYP isoforms may occur simultaneously. Some important drug interactions involving glucuronidation have been documented and others can be postulated. This review summarizes the relevant literature pertaining to drug glucuronidation and its implications for clinical psychopharmacology.