Aortic dissection involving an aberrant right subclavian artery: CT and MR findings

Treatment with Aortic Stent Graft Placement for Stanford B-Type Aortic Dissection in a Patient with an Aberrant Right Subclavian Artery

A 71-year-old man visited our hospital with the chief complaint of back pain and was diagnosed with acute aortic dissection (Debakey type III, Stanford type B). He was found to have a variant branching pattern in which the right subclavian artery was the fourth branch of the aorta. We performed conservative management for uncomplicated Stanford type B aortic dissection, and the patient was discharged. An ulcer-like projection (ULP) was discovered during outpatient follow-up. Complicated type B aortic dissection was suspected, and we performed thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). The aim of operative treatment was ULP closure; thus we placed two stent grafts in the descending aorta from the distal portion of the right subclavian artery. The patient was released without complications on postoperative day 5. Deliberate sizing and examination of placement location were necessary when placing the stent graft, but operative techniques allowed the procedure to be safely completed.

Thoracic involvement of type A aortic dissection and intramural hematoma: diagnostic accuracy--comparison of emergency helical CT and surgical findings

PURPOSE

To assess the accuracy of various findings at emergency helical computed tomography (CT) for the evaluation of thoracic involvement of type A aortic dissection (AD) and type A intramural hematoma (IMH) and to compare these findings with those at surgical confirmation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty-seven patients with acute chest pain underwent emergency helical CT and subsequent surgery for type A AD or IMH. Patients in whom AD or IMH was detected in three segments of the thoracic aorta or those in whom there was a site of any entry tear, arch branch vessel involvement, pericardial effusion, or aortic arch anomaly were examined at helical CT. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of helical CT, along with 95% CIs, were calculated by using surgical confirmation as the reference standard.

RESULTS

For the detection of AD or IMH of the thoracic aorta, the accuracy of helical CT was 100%. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy, respectively, were 82%, 100%, and 84% for an entry tear; 95%, 100%, and 98% for arch branch vessel involvement; and 83%, 100%, and 91% for pericardial effusion. These values were all 100% for aortic arch anomalies.

CONCLUSION

Emergency helical CT of the thorax depicts findings that are highly accurate in the evaluation of acute type A AD and IMH.