Distraction external fixation in lateral compression pelvic fractures

Evaluating the stability of external fixators following pelvic injury: A systematic review of biomechanical testing methods

INTRODUCTION

This systematic review aims to identify previously used techniques in biomechanics to assess pelvic instability following pelvic injury, focusing on external fixation constructs.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted to include biomechanical studies and to exclude clinical trials.

RESULTS

Of an initial 4666 studies found, 38 met the inclusion criteria. 84% of the included studies were retrieved from PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. The studies analysed 106 postmortem specimens, 154 synthetic bones, and 103 computational models. Most specimens were male (97% synthetic, 70% postmortem specimens). Both the type of injury and the classification system employed varied across studies. About 82% of the injuries assessed were of type C. Two different fixators were tested for FFPII and type A injury, five for type B injury, and fifteen for type C injury. Large variability was observed for external fixation constructs concerning device type and configuration, pin size, and geometry. Biomechanical studies deployed various methods to assess injury displacement, deformation, stiffness, and motion. Thereby, loading protocols differed and inconsistent definitions of failure were determined. Measurement techniques applied in biomechanical test setups included strain gauges, force transducers, and motion tracking techniques.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

An ideal fixation method should be safe, stable, non-obstructive, and have low complication rates. Although biomechanical testing should ensure that the load applied during testing is representative of a physiological load, a high degree of variability was found in the current literature in both the loading and measurement equipment. The lack of a standardised test design for fixation constructs in pelvic injuries across the studies challenges comparisons between them. When interpreting the results of biomechanical studies, it seems crucial to consider the limitations in cross-study comparability, with implications on their applicability to the clinical setting.

The role of anterior supra-acetabular external fixator as definitive treatment for anterior ring fixation in unstable pelvic fractures

PURPOSE

Management of anterior ring injuries is still a matter of discussion, and there are only few studies reporting anterior external fixator as definitive treatment for unstable pelvic injuries. This study aimed to describe the clinical and radiological outcomes of a consecutive series of mechanically unstable pelvic injuries that were treated with definitive anterior supra-acetabular external fixator for the anterior ring, and to identify risk factors for failure.

METHODS

We included a consecutive series of patients with unstable pelvic ring fractures who underwent anterior supra-acetabular external fixation for definitive treatment, between January 2012 and January 2020. All demographics, associated injuries and procedures, injury mechanism, and complications were analysed. Pelvic fracture was classified based on Orthopaedic Trauma Association/Tile AO (OTA/AO) and Young-Burgess classifications. Complications associated with the external fixator were revised. All patients were functionally evaluated at final follow-up and asked to report their clinical outcomes using the Majeed score.

RESULTS

A total of 47 patients were included, of which 25 were females. The median age was 44 years (interquartile range 23-59). Median follow-up duration was 14 months (interquartile range 6-31). The most frequent aetiology was motor vehicle accident (35), followed by fall from height (8). All fractures required posterior pelvic ring fixation. The median time during which patients had external fixation in situ was 11 weeks (interquartile range 9-13). All patients achieved healing of pelvic fracture at median time of 10 weeks (interquartile range 8-12). At final follow-up, the median displacement of the anterior pelvis was 6 mm (interquartile range 0-11). Superficial infection was the most common complication (n = 7). No washout procedures were needed. No major complication was reported. No patient required reoperation for anterior ring fracture. The median Majeed score was 88 points (range 60-95; interquartile range 80-90) at final follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that the use of supra-acetabular external fixator is safe and effective for definitive treatment of the anterior ring in unstable pelvic fractures. It is a method with high proportion of excellent results, regardless of the type of fracture. The rate of complications is low, and it does not compromise functional results.

Mid-term follow-up of superior pubic ramus osteotomy in locked symphysis pubis with urethral injury: A case report

A locked pubic ramus body is an unusual variant of lateral compression injury. Till date, there have been only 25 cases reported in the published literature. We herein described a case where the right pubic ramus was entrapped within the opposite obturator foramen with an overlap of greater than 4 cm, with associated urethral injury. When all maneuvers of closed and instrumented reduction failed, we performed a superior pubic ramus osteotomy on the left side and unlocked the incarcerated right pubic ramus. The osteotomy site was stabilized with a 6-hole recon plate. The patient underwent delayed urethral repair 10 weeks after the index surgery. At three-year follow-up, the patient has sexual dysfunction especially difficulty in maintaining erection, secondary urethral stricture, heterotopic ossification, and breakage of implants.

INFIX-safe and effective surgical option for complex fracture patterns of the anterior pelvic ring: A prospective single center study

Background

Complex fracture patterns of anterior pelvic ring are a challenge and usually needs extensive surgeries. The purpose of this study was to evaluate INFIX as a minimally invasive procedure for such injuries in terms of feasibility, outcomes and complications in the Indian population.

Methods

Patients with complex fracture patterns of anterior pelvic ring were selected for anterior INFIX application along with standard posterior stabilization. Outcomes were assessed radiographically by Matta's criteria and amount of displacement. Post-operative CT scan for relation of implant to vital structures and Doppler at varying hip flexion for possible vascular occlusion was used. Functional outcomes included both disease specific scores (Majeed score, IOWA pelvic score) and quality of life scores (SMFA, SF-12). Complications were also noted.

Results

12 cases out of 112 patients had complex fracture pattern of the anterior ring. Most common injury pattern were LC-3 and VS (n = 6 and 3) Young and Burgess type. The average follow up was 6 months. Fracture reduction as per Matta's criteria was excellent in 10 (83.3%) cases and good in 2 (16.6%) cases with functional outcomes excellent in 11 cases, and a mean Majeed score of 92.67 ± 5.8. The average SMFA score was 51 ± 4.39 and mean SF-12 scores for physical and mental health were 48.493 ± 6.74 and 56.370 ± 4.04 respectively. Complications noted were lateral femoral cutaneous nerve palsy (1/24 nerves), skin dehiscence (n = 2), infection (n = 2) and sacral nonunion (n = 1).

Conclusion

INFIX is a safe and effective minimally invasive technique for addressing complexfracture patterns involving the anterior half of pelvic ring with excellent fracture reduction, radiological and functional outcomes and predictable fracture healing.

A screw view model of navigation guided minimal invasive percutaneous pelvic screws insertion for lateral compression pelvic ring injuries: A case report

RATIONALE

The objective of the present study was to evaluate the accuracy, effectiveness, and safety of screw view model of navigation (SVMN) guided minimal invasive percutaneous pelvic screws (PPSs) insertion for lateral compression pelvic ring injuries (PRI).

PATIENT CONCERNS

A female patient experienced a high falling injury, and presented with pain, swelling, deformity, and movement limitation of the left hip for 3 hours.

DIAGNOSES

She was diagnosed with pelvic fractures, left iliac fracture, left pubic branch fracture, left ischial branch fracture, and lumbar transverse process fracture.

INTERVENTIONS

We used a SVMN technique to guide PPSs insertion, including a percutaneous anterior inferior iliac spine screw, a percutaneous iliac screw (PIS), and a percutaneous sacroiliac screw (PSIS).

OUTCOMES

In total, 3 PPSs were inserted and all were presented with excellent position postoperatively. The designing time of all screws was 11.7 minutes, the time of all guide needles insertion was 18.1 minutes, the time of all screws insertion was 32.8 minutes, blood loss was 21 mL, and the time of radiation exposure lasted 7.2 minutes. Moreover, surgical complications, including neurovascular compromise, wound infection, fracture nonunion, and screw loosening, were not observed during the 12 months follow up visit.

LESSONS

SVMN technique guided PPSs insertion is an effective and safety approach for the treatment of PRI in selected patients. Besides, it is necessary for surgeons to master the rationale of computer navigation, to familiar with the anatomy of pelvis and to select suitable patients.

Functional outcome of 'LC-1 pelvic ring injury with incomplete sacral fracture' managed non-operatively

OBJECTIVES

Standard guidelines regarding the management of un-displaced LC-1 type pelvic ring injury supported by data in literature are lacking, though it is considered to be stable and widely managed non-operatively. In our study we evaluated the functional outcome of LC-1 pelvic ring injury with incomplete sacral fracture managed non-operatively in patients having age more than 18 years and minimum follow-up of 6 months.

METHODS

46 patients having LC-1 pelvic ring injury with incomplete sacral fractures having age more than 18 years and minimum follow-up of 6 months were identified from the hospital record. All these patients were managed with non-weight bearing walking for first 3 weeks followed by weight bearing as tolerated. Patients were called in outpatient department for final evaluation of functional outcome measured according to Majeed score.

RESULTS

Mean Majeed score was 82.59 ± 6.77 (excellent in 27 patients and good in 19 patients). 8 patients had fractures in addition to pelvic ring injury and 3 patients had abdominal injuries (3 excellent, 8 good). 11 patients had follow-up less than 12 months (mean Majeed score 84.36 ± 5.75; 8 excellent, 3 good) and 35 patients had follow-up more than 12 months (mean Majeed score 82.03 ± 7.04; 19 excellent, 16 good). There was no mortality in any group.

CONCLUSION

LC-1pelvic ring injury with incomplete sacrum fracture can be managed non-operatively with non-weight bearing walking for first 3 weeks followed by weight bearing as tolerated with excellent or good functional outcome. The best functional outcome for a patient is achieved within 12 months and does not change after that period. Also being a low energy trauma this injury has low mortality rate.

Fixation of Anterior Pelvic Ring Injuries

Treatment of anterior pelvic ring injuries involves both acute stabilization during the initial resuscitation and definitive fixation. Definitive management has evolved substantially over the past 40 years with improved patient mobilization and long-term outcomes. Although its use has recently declined, external fixation remains a favorable option in certain situations. Symphyseal plating is the preferred technique for stabilization of symphyseal diastasis because of superior stability and low morbidity. Ramus screws can be effective for simple ramus fractures but require a careful technique because of the proximity of neurovascular structures. The subcutaneous internal fixator provides a good option for obese patients in whom external fixation would be poorly tolerated. Regardless of fixation strategy, posterior ring reduction and stabilization is crucial.

External fixation of unstable pelvic fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Unstable pelvic fractures are typically caused by high-impact trauma. Early stabilization is required to prevent further neurological or visceral injury, haemorrhage, reduce pain, infection and long-term deformity and disability. The aim was to review the optimal external fixation techniques and management for unstable pelvic fractures.

METHODS

A total of 28 studies were identified from the initial database search. Seventeen studies met our inclusion criteria - eight prospective cohorts, four retrospective cohorts and five in vitro studies. This equated to 539 patients and 38 cadaveric (in vitro) models.

RESULTS

Type B and double vertical fractures have less re-displacement (43.7% and 68.2% <5 mm, respectively) than Type C fractures (55.7% >15 mm) regardless of pin placement. Greater than 50% experience a complication with the most common being pin site infection (36%) and a trend towards increased infection with increasing pins was seen. Most can be managed with antibiotics alone (93%). A minimum time of 6-8 weeks in frame was required for definitive management of all fractures.

CONCLUSION

This review supports the use of supra-acetabular pins over iliac crest pins to decrease re-displacement, the least number of pins for the shortest amount of time and the largest size pin where possible. Type B fractures will generally have a better outcome than Type C fractures. Definitive management in a frame should be at least 8 weeks. Further studies directly comparing iliac crest and supra-acetabular pin placement are recommended.

Patient Weight-bearing after Pelvic Fracture Surgery-A Systematic Review of the Literature: What is the Modern Evidence Base?

Background

Little attention in the literature appears to have been paid to the issue of postoperative weight-bearing protocols for different injury patterns after pelvic fracture surgery. The primary aim of this study is to review the currently available literature to define the level of available evidence used to inform surgical decisions on weight-bearing after pelvic fracture surgery. Secondary aims are to assess the published methods of fracture classification, surgical management, and assessment or reporting of patient outcomes.

Methods

A systematic review of the English language literature from 1990 to 2016 was undertaken. Eligible papers were all papers reporting minimum 6-month outcomes following surgery for pelvic fractures in adults. Exclusion criteria included pathological fractures or those resulting from penetrating injury, solely osteoporotic fractures, or series with less than 6 months of follow-up data.

Results

There is very little published scientific data to inform the treating surgeon on postoperative weight-bearing protocols after pelvic fracture surgery, with no randomized trials and only 1 paper out of 122 stating this as a primary aim. More than half of the papers published did not state what postoperative protocol was employed. There is no standardization of outcome measures, with less than 20% of papers using the most common validated outcome scoring system; in contrast, there is good agreement on the use of either the Tile (75%) or Burgess and Young (20%) classification.

Limitations

Due to the lack of published studies looking at the topic of postoperative weight-bearing after pelvic fractures, no specific recommendations are possible. As large numbers of papers were included, they were not individually assessed for bias.

Conclusion

A review of postoperative weight-bearing regimes reveals a nonexistent scientific evidence base from which to make recommendations, although a consensus strategy has been identified. Future research needs to be directed at this topic, as has already been the case in numerous other fracture areas, since the advantages of early mobility are potentially significant. The reported methodology for assessing and reporting patient outcomes after pelvic fracture surgery reveals no consistent standards, and the majority of papers use no specific outcome scoring system.

How to cite this article

Rickman M, Link B-C, Solomon LB. Patient Weight-bearing after Pelvic Fracture Surgery-A Systematic Review of the Literature: What is the Modern Evidence Base? Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2019;14(1):45-52.

Anterior Pelvic Ring: Introduction to Evaluation and Management

The evaluation and management of pelvic ring injuries continues to evolve. Historic treatment was primarily nonsurgical, which yielded to open surgical treatment as the benefits of restoring pelvic anatomy and stability became clear. The development of percutaneous techniques for pelvic ring fixation enabled surgeons to reduce and stabilize certain injuries without the need for large open surgical dissections. Although percutaneous iliosacral screw fixation of sacral fractures and sacroiliac disruptions is the standard for most posterior pelvic ring injuries, the evaluation and treatment of anterior pelvic ring disruptions remains a controversial topic among surgeons who treat these injuries. Universally accepted indications for anterior pelvic ring stabilization do not exist, and there is little comparative data to support one surgical technique over another. In fact, some believe that for many injuries, the anterior ring rarely requires fixation after stable fixation of the posterior pelvic ring. The purpose of this work is to present a brief history on management of the anterior pelvic ring as a component of pelvic ring disruptions and briefly review the anatomy of the anterior pelvic ring. Finally, we will introduce the current techniques available for anterior pelvic reduction/stabilization and present information on evaluation of anterior ring stability as a means of guiding treatment.

Anterior Subcutaneous Internal Pelvic Fixation/INFIX: A Systemic Review

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this article is to review the available literature on anterior subcutaneous internal pelvic fixation (ASIPF) to identify indications, clinical and radiographic outcomes, and compare these with alternative fixation methods.

METHODS

Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines, a systematic search on PubMed and Google Scholar was performed. Articles included were in the English language or English translations and published between 2007 and 2018. Studies included were appraised with narrative data synthesis.

RESULTS

Twenty-five articles with 496 patients were included. These included 17 case series, with 3 case reports reporting adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

ASIPF and the appropriate posterior fixation resulted in healing of pelvic ring injuries in 99.5% of cases. Indications include unstable pelvic ring injuries with the appropriate posterior fixation. Radiographic parameters and outcome measures were infrequently reported. ASIPF is a valuable tool for reduction and fixation in unstable pelvic ring injuries. Complications include lateral femoral cutaneous nerve irritation (26.3%); heterotopic ossification (36%); infection (3%); and femoral nerve palsy (1%), which is likely related to placing the bar and screws too deep.

Early Experience with Reduction of Unstable Pelvic Fracture Using a Computer-Aided Reduction Frame

Purpose

The optimal closed reduction technique for unstable pelvic fractures remains controversial. The purpose of this study is to verify the effectiveness and report early experiences with the reduction of unstable pelvic fractures using a computer-aided pelvic reduction frame.

Methods

From January 2015 to August 2016, a total of 10 patients with unilateral unstable pelvic fractures were included in this study. The surgical reduction procedure was based on the protocol of the computer-aided pelvic reduction frame that we proposed in a previous work. The quality of the reductions achieved using this system was evaluated with residual translational and rotational differences between the actual and virtual reduction positions of pelvis. The duration of the operation was recorded for quality control.

Results

The mean times required to set up the frame, to complete the virtual surgery simulation, and to reduce the unstable pelvic fractures were 10.3, 20.9, and 7.5 min, respectively. The maximum residual translational and rotational displacements were less than 6.5 mm and 3.71 degrees, respectively.

Conclusions

This computer-aided reduction frame can be a useful tool for the speedy and accurate reduction of unstable pelvic fractures. Further clinical studies should be conducted with larger patient samples to verify its safety and efficacy.

The use of external fixators in the definitive stabilisation of the pelvis in polytrauma patients: Safety, efficacy and clinical outcomes

OBJECTIVES

To analyse the complications and outcomes (functional/radiographic) of Pelvic External Fixators applied as part of the definitive fixation in polytrauma patients.

DESIGN

A single center retrospective chart review.

SETTING

A level-1 trauma center.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We reviewed all the polytrauma patients (ISS>16) between 2007 and 2012 that had a PEF applied more than 30days. Complications including infection, aseptic loosening, neurological injury, loss of reduction, non-union and mal-union were recorded. Pelvic asymmetry and Deformity Index (DI) were measured at the immediate postoperative radiographs and final follow-up. The functional outcome at final follow up was estimated using a scale previously reported by Chiou et al.

RESULTS

59 patients with mean age of 38.4 (16 - 81) years and mean ISS score 28 (16- 66) were included. The PEFs were applied for mean duration of 56 (30-104) days. The average follow-up was 403days. 22 injuries were type B and 37 type C (AO/OTA). The most common symptomatic complications were pin site infection in 11 (18.6%) and loosening in 5 (8.5%) cases. 44 (74.5%) patients had satisfactory functional outcome. The immediate post-operative and final asymmetry and DI were compared between the two pelvic injury groups (type B and C fractures). The difference in displacement progression was more for type C injuries (p=0.034) but no correlation to the functional outcome was evident.

CONCLUSION

PEF can be used as definitive alternative stabilization method in specific situations at polytrauma setting. Radiological displacement occurred in both type B and C injuries but the clinical outcome was not correlated to this displacement. Complications related to PEF do not affect the final clinical outcome.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III.

Midterm Radiographic and Functional Outcomes of the Anterior Subcutaneous Internal Pelvic Fixator (INFIX) for Pelvic Ring Injuries

OBJECTIVE

To describe our experience using the anterior internal pelvic fixator (INFIX) for treating pelvic ring injuries.

DESIGN

Case Series.

SETTING

Level 1 Trauma Center.

PATIENTS

Eighty-three patients with pelvic ring injuries were treated with INFIX. Follow-up average was 35 months (range 12-80.33).

INTERVENTION

Surgical treatment of pelvic ring injuries included reduction, appropriate posterior fixation, and INFIX placement.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Reduction using the pelvic deformity index and pubic symphysis widening, Majeed functional scores, complications; infection, implant failure, heterotopic ossification (HO), nerve injury, and pain.

RESULTS

All patients healed in an appropriate time frame (full weight bearing 12 weeks postoperation). The average pelvic deformity index reduction (injury = 0.0420 ± 0.0412, latest FU = 0.0254 ± 0.0243) was 39.58%. The average reduction of pubic symphysis injuries was 56.92%. The average Majeed score of patients at latest follow-up was 78.77 (range 47-100). Complications were 3 infections, 1 case of implant failure, 2 cases implantation too deep, 7 cases of lateral femoral cutaneous nerve irritation, and 3 cases of pain associated with the device. HO was seen in >50% of the patients, correlated with increased age (P < 0.007), injury severity score (P < 0.05) but only 1 case was symptomatic.

CONCLUSIONS

The pelvic injuries had good functional and radiological outcomes with INFIX and the appropriate posterior fixation. The downside is removal requiring a second anesthetic, there is a learning curve, HO often occurs, the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve may get irritated which often resolves once the implants are removed. Surgery-specific implants need to be developed.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Midterm radiologic and functional outcomes of minimally-invasive fixation of unstable pelvic fractures using anterior internal fixator(INFIX) and percutaneous iliosacral screws

BACKGROUND

Anterior pelvic external fixation is associated with pin site infections, aseptic loosening with loss of reduction, frame bulkiness hindering patient mobilization and consequent difficulties in inpatient nursing. We performed a single-center prospective series to evaluate the feasibility, safety, limitations and midterm radiologic and functional outcomes of an alternative minimally invasive pelvic internal fixation technique using an anterior subcutaneous pelvic internal fixator (INFIX) and percutaneous iliosacral screws in unstable pelvic ring fractures.

METHODS

Fifteen consecutive patients with vertically and/or rotationally unstable pelvic fractures, presenting to a Level-1 trauma center were treated with closed reduction, appropriate posterior stabilization with percutaneous iliosacral screws and anterior INFIX application. Outcomes were analyzed with respect to the quality of fracture reduction (Matta's radiologic criteria), ease of inpatient nursing, patient mobility and comfort, functional outcomes at final follow-up (Majeed score, SF-12 score), social reintegration and complications.

RESULTS

Most common injury pattern was AO/OTA type 61-C pelvic fracture in thirteen patients. Mean procedure time and intra-operative blood loss were, 57.1+/-4.9 min (range,51-68 min) and 115.3+/-26.7 ml (range,80-170 ml) respectively. Mean follow-up was 34.9+/-4.1 months (range,31-42 months). Fracture reduction was excellent in twelve and good in three patients (Matta's criteria). Functional outcomes were excellent in eight and good in seven patients (Majeed score). Mean SF-12 scores for physical and mental health were 48.58+/-5.61 and 50.89+/-3.97 respectively. Thirteen patients returned to their pre-injury jobs. All fifteen patients reintegrated into society without any restrictions. INFIX was removed at a mean post-operative period of 7.3+/-1.5 months (range,5.5-11 months). Complications included, lateral femoral cutaneous nerve irritation(n = 1), superficial wound infection(n = 1) and loss of reduction(n = 2).

CONCLUSION

Minimally invasive pelvic stabilization using INFIX and percutaneous iliosacral screws is easy to learn and apply, achieves good fracture reduction and definitive stabilization with minimum complications and offers excellent functional outcomes at a minimum follow-up of 31 months.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Computer-aided pelvic reduction frame for anatomical closed reduction of unstable pelvic fractures

Traditional closed reductions of unstable pelvic fractures are mainly performed by surgeons using manual manipulation and subjective verification based on intra-operative roentgenography. It is difficult to perform an accurate closed reduction because of a lack of adequate knowledge of the displacement patterns and an inability to apply the reduction in correct direction. Using the concept of the remote center of motion mechanism and computer-aided design software, we developed a pelvic reduction frame for use in anatomical closed reductions of unstable pelvic fractures. With three-dimensional reconstruction technique and the matrix algorithm, the spatial orientation of the displaced hemipelvis can be calculated and deconstructed into several rotational and translational movements that can be completed with the frame. To verify the accuracy of this system, the rotations were repeated 10 times in arbitrary degrees and directions. After the matrix is calculated, the displaced hemipelvis can be reduced to the anatomical position using our frame. The maximum residual translational and rotational displacements were less than 5 mm and 4 degrees, which indicated the accuracy of this system. The maximum average residual translation and rotation were 1.87 mm in Z-axis (ranging: 4.63-0.1 mm) and 1.1 degrees around Y-axis (ranging: 3.81-0.13 degrees), respectively. Only the Z-axial translation showed a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05). In conclusion, the proposed pelvic reduction frame could be a useful tool for the anatomical reduction of unstable pelvic fractures.

Nonoperative treatment of intermediate severity lateral compression type 1 pelvic ring injuries with minimally displaced complete sacral fracture

OBJECTIVES

Controversy exists regarding optimum management of lateral compression type 1 (LC1) pelvic ring injuries (OTA type 61-B2.1), particularly in patients with complete sacral fractures. We hypothesized that nonoperative treatment would result in acceptable functional outcomes.

DESIGN

Database review.

SETTING

Level I trauma center.

PATIENTS

We identified patients treated for LC1 fractures (n = 406) from 2007 to 2011 and analyzed a subset of LC1 injuries of "intermediate severity" characterized by complete sacral fracture with less than 1 cm initial displacement (n = 104).

INTERVENTION

Fifty patients were contacted for functional outcome assessment at average follow-up of 33 months.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Majeed pelvic score and physical component summary (PCS) score and mental component summary (MCS) score of 12-item Short-Form Health Survey version 2.

RESULTS

Average Majeed pelvic score was 85.5, yielding 33 excellent, 9 good, 5 fair, and 3 poor outcomes. Mean PCS and MCS scores were 48.8 and 48.9, respectively (both confidence intervals include 50, the score for a healthy normative population). Patients with lower extremity injuries had a trend toward lower PCS and MCS and statistically significant lower mean Majeed scores (P = 0.01). Thirty-five of 37 patients without lower extremity injury had good or excellent categorical outcomes based on Majeed scores. No significant differences were observed regarding weight-bearing status, extent of anterior ring injury, or injury severity score. Radiographic follow-up was available for 36 of 50 patients. No fracture was displaced >1 cm.

CONCLUSIONS

Acceptable functional outcomes can be expected after nonsurgical management of LC1 pelvic injuries with complete sacral fracture and less than 1 cm initial displacement.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic level IV.

Radiographic displacement in pelvic ring disruption: reliability of 3 previously described measurement techniques

BACKGROUND

The literature on pelvic ring disruptions is based largely on nonstandardized and nonvalidated radiographic outcomes. A thorough review of the literature revealed only 3 described methods for measuring radiographic displacement and 1 frequently used grading system for displacement. We aimed to test the reliability of these previously published radiographic measurement methods and grading system.

METHODS

Five separate observers measured radiographic displacement on the standardized pre- and postoperative anteroposterior, inlet, and outlet views of 25 patients with surgically treated Tile B and C pelvic fractures. The readers measured their initial impression based on the Tornetta and Matta grading system (excellent, good, fair, and poor). Next, they measured displacement using the inlet and outlet ratio as described by Sagi, the cross measurement technique as described by Keshishyan, and the absolute displacement method (ADM) as described by Lefaivre. The millimeter measurement obtained by the ADM was converted using the Tornetta and Matta grading system. Each continuous measure was compared for interobserver reliability using intraclass correlations (ICCs), and the categorical outcomes were compared using a kappa statistic. Finally, the relationship of the initial impression to the grade as determined by the ADM was compared using kappa agreement.

RESULTS

The agreement among observers based on initial impression was poor (kappa statistic, 0.306) but was fair among those reductions that were excellent (κ = 0.495). Using the Sagi method, the reliability ICC was moderate for the postoperative inlet [0.515, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.338-0.702] and outlet ratio (0.594, 95% CI, 0.423-0.760) but almost perfect in preoperative radiographs (inlet: 0.814, 95% CI, 0.703-0.901; outlet: 0.863, 95% CI, 0.775-0.929). The ICCs for all interpretations of the Keshishyan technique were excellent but were highest when considered as a ratio (preoperative: 0.938, 95% CI, 0.894-0.969; postoperative: 0.912, 95% CI, 0.850-0.955). Using the ADM, the location and film used for measurement had poor agreement, and the ICC for the measurement in millimeters was moderate (preoperative: 0.522, 95% CI, 0.342-0.708; postoperative: 0.432, 95% CI, 0.255-0.634) and the kappa agreement poor when converted using the Tornetta and Matta scale (κ = 0.2190). The agreement between the impression and the converted grade from the ADM was poor (κ = 0.2520).

CONCLUSIONS

Radiographic measurement in pelvic x-rays to date has been nonvalidated, and we found the interobserver reliability on common methods, including overall impression and absolute displacement in millimeters, to be poor. The inlet/outlet ratio as described by Sagi was reliable only with wide displacement. The cross measurement technique allows least observer choice and had excellent reliability but does not give a measurement that we can easily interpret based on convention in pelvic fracture description.

Sequential reduction and fixation for windswept pelvic ring injuries (LC3) corrects the deformity until healed

PURPOSE

The restoration, and fixation, of normal pelvic anatomy after a windswept type injury can be a difficult endeavor and our purpose is to describe a method to accomplish this.

METHODS

A stepwise and sequential technique was utilized to effectively reduce and stabilize this injury pattern. By first closing down the open disruption posteriorly and fixing with a partially threaded SI screw, a stable platform was created upon which to work from and subsequently distract and reduce the contralateral side via an anterior internal fixator (seven), external fixator (one), or plate (one). This was followed by a fully threaded SI screw in the compression side of the sacral fracture to hold the distraction. Nine consecutive patients with LC3 (61-B3.2) were included in the study with an average FU of 15 months.

RESULTS

The Keshishyan deformity index revealed an initial mean deformity of 0.0456 which was corrected to 0.0170 (postop) and 0.0181 at latest follow up. This entailed an average correction of 62 % at the latest follow up. The follow-up group was significantly different from pre-op (p = 0.0040), but not post-op (p = 0.6833). Furthermore, post-op was significantly different from pre-op (p = 0.0089).

CONCLUSION

This is an effective method of correcting and maintaining reduction until healing for this relatively rare and difficult-to-treat injury pattern.

The long-term clinical outcome after pelvic ring injuries

We report the functional and socioeconomic long-term outcome of patients with pelvic ring injuries.

We identified 109 patients treated at a Level I trauma centre between 1973 and 1990 with multiple blunt orthopaedic injuries including an injury to the pelvic ring, with an Injury Severity Score (ISS) of ≥ 16. These patients were invited for clinical review at a minimum of ten years after the initial injury, at which point functional results, general health scores and socioeconomic factors were assessed.

In all 33 isolated anterior (group A), 33 isolated posterior (group P) and 43 combined anterior/posterior pelvic ring injuries (group A/P) were included. The mean age of the patients at injury was 28.8 years (5 to 55) and the mean ISS was 22.7 (16 to 44).

At review the mean Short-Form 12 physical component score for the A/P group was 38.71 (22.12 to 56.56) and the mean Hannover Score for Polytrauma Outcome subjective score was 67.27 (12.48 to 147.42), being significantly worse compared with the other two groups (p = 0.004 and p = 0.024, respectively). A total of 42 patients (39%) had a limp and 12 (11%) required crutches. Car or public transport usage was restricted in 16 patients (15%). Overall patients in groups P and A/P had a worse outcome. The long-term outcome of patients with posterior or combined anterior/posterior pelvic ring injuries is poorer than of those with an isolated anterior injury.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:548–53.

Assessment of Lateral Compression type 1 pelvic ring injuries by intraoperative manipulation: which fracture pattern is unstable?

PURPOSE

We performed a prospective study to document, by intra-operative manipulation under anaesthesia (MUA) of the pelvic ring, the stability of lateral compression type 1 injuries that were managed in a Level-I Trauma Centre. The documentation of the short-term outcome of the management of these injuries was our secondary aim.

METHODS

A total of 63 patients were included in the study. Thirty-five patients (group A) were treated surgically whereas 28 (group B) were managed nonoperatively. Intraoperative rotational instability, evident by more than two centimetres of translation during the manipulation manoeuvre, was combined with a complete sacral fracture in all cases.

RESULTS

A statistically significant difference was present between the length of hospital stay, the time to independent pain-free mobilisation, post-manipulation pain levels and opioid requirements between the two groups, with group A demonstrating significantly decreased values in all these four variables (p < 0.05). There was also a significant difference between the pre- and 72-hour post-manipulation visual analogue scale and analgesic requirements of the group A patients, whereas the patients in group B did not demonstrate such a difference.

CONCLUSION

LC-1 injuries with a complete posterior sacral injury are inheritably rotationally unstable and patients presenting with these fracture patterns definitely gain benefit from surgical stabilisation.

Methodology and interpretation of radiographic outcomes in surgically treated pelvic fractures: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

To identify and evaluate previously described methods for the measurement, and interpretation, of radiographic outcomes of operatively treated pelvic fractures.

DATA SOURCES

A systematic review of the available literature was performed using all major databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, MEDLINE IN-PROGRESS, and Cochrane Central) in August 2009.

STUDY SELECTION

Inclusion criteria were case series, cohort studies, or clinical trials regarding orthopaedic treatment of acute traumatic pelvic ring fractures treated surgically in adults, with at least 12 weeks of radiographic follow-up. Exclusion criteria were case reports or case series of <10 patients, review articles, foreign language articles, and series where time frame of outcome measurement was not stated were excluded.

DATA EXTRACTION

Modality, and timeline, of the radiographic assessment was recorded. Next, the description of the method of radiographic measurement technique used was scrutinized for standardization. The interpretation of the radiographic measurement was evaluated, and any grading scale used was recorded. The interpretation of the quality of the radiographic result as described by each author was recorded. Finally, a qualitative methodological analysis was performed.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Number of standardized radiographic assessment techniques used (3 of 31) and interpretation scales used (13 of 31) were calculated. Nonweighted mean follow-up time (30.6 months) and overall positive radiographic outcomes were calculated (78.6% good or excellent).

CONCLUSIONS

Reporting of radiographic outcomes in pelvic fractures has been done using largely unstandardized and universally untested measurement techniques. The interpretations of these measurements are also inconsistent and untested. Substantive future research is needed in this area.

Persistent impairment after surgically treated lateral compression pelvic injury

BACKGROUND

Recently, fixation of lateral compression (LC) pelvic fractures has been advocated to improve patient comfort and to allow earlier mobilization without loss of reduction, thus minimizing adverse systemic effects. However, the degree of acceptable deformity and persistence of disability are unclear.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We determined if (1) injury pattern; (2) demographics; (3) final posterior displacement; (4) L5/S1 involvement; (5) associated injuries; and (6) time influence outcome measurements, sexual dysfunction, and pain.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 119 patients with unstable LC injuries treated surgically between 2000 and 2010. There were 52 males and 67 females; mean age was 39 years with a mean body mass index of 27 kg/m(2). All patients underwent clinical examination and radiographic imaging for instability and accompanying injuries. We obtained Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA). The minimum followup was 12 months (mean, 33 months; range, 12-100 months).

RESULTS

SMFA subscores were not affected by injury pattern and demographics. Posterior reduction was less than 5 mm with persistent displacement in 99 of 119 (83%). Displacement of 5 to 10 mm did not affect any SMFA subscore at any time interval. Patients with additional lower extremity injuries had worse SMFA scores. Function improved with time. A visual analog scale pain score of 4 or more at 6 months predicted pain and overall SMFA score at last followup.

CONCLUSIONS

Unstable LC pelvic ring injuries result in persistent disability based on validated outcome measurements. Near anatomical reduction can be achieved and maintained. While our findings need to be confirmed in studies with high rates of followup, patients with unstable LC pelvic injuries should be counseled concerning the possibility of some degree of persistent disability.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Anterior pelvic reduction and fixation using a subcutaneous internal fixator

Acute traumatic pelvic instability mandates reduction and mechanical stabilization to maximize the chance of a good functional outcome. Posterior pelvic fixation is frequently inadequate to stabilize the pelvic ring in isolation. Fixation augmentation with anterior pelvic ring implants can take several forms, including plates, medullary screws, or external fixation. Based on a multitude of patient and injury factors, external fixation may be the definitive anterior pelvic implant of choice. However, many drawbacks exist with this treatment, most notably the high infection rates of the transcutaneous pins, impaired patient mobilization, and suboptimal mechanical properties. We present a technique of a subcutaneous anterior pelvic fixator as an alternative method of anterior pelvic ring reduction and stabilization that avoids many of the drawbacks of traditional anterior pelvic external fixation.

Oblique distraction external pelvic fixation

Simple anterior pelvic external fixation is a safe and effective strategy for reduction of pelvic ring deformity as well as the provisional or definitive stabilization of selected patterns of pelvic ring disruption. A two-pin oblique anterior pelvic deformity correction frame is a unique frame configuration designed to reduce and stabilize lateral compression pelvic ring disruptions associated with flexion/internal rotation hemipelvic deformities. In a small case series, we demonstrate that the oblique distraction external fixation frame alone or in combination with internal fixation is a simple and safe strategy for reduction and stabilization of unstable multiplanar hemipelvic deformities associated with partial posterior ring stability.

Functional outcomes in women after high-energy pelvic ring injury

OBJECTIVES

Residual dysfunction after pelvic trauma has been previously described, but limited functional outcome data are available in the female population after high-energy pelvic ring injury. The purposes of this study were to determine functional outcomes and to characterize factors predictive of outcome.

DESIGN

Prospective collection of functional outcomes data.

SETTING

Level I trauma center.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

Eighty-seven women with mean age of 33.5 years and mean Injury Severity Score of 23.1 were included. The Orthopaedic Trauma Association classification included 32 B-type and 55 C-type fractures. Four were open fractures and six had bladder ruptures.

INTERVENTION

Forty-nine patients were treated operatively and 38 nonoperatively.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment (MFA) questionnaires were completed after a minimum of 16 months and a mean of 41 months of follow-up.

RESULTS

The mean MFA score was 33. Only 15 women (17.2%) had MFA scores comparable with an uninjured reference value (9.3), and 34 (39.1%) had better than the reference value for prior hip injury (25.5). Anteroposterior compression injuries had worse scores versus other patterns (48.3 vs 31.0, P = 0.01), and trends toward worse outcomes were noted after symphyseal disruption (P = 0.11) and transsymphyseal plating (P = 0.09). Sacral fracture or sacroiliac injury, amount of initial or final displacement, and type of posterior ring treatment were not associated with MFA scores. Mean scores were 32.3 after surgery and 34.0 after nonoperative management (P = 0.67). Functional outcomes were not related to age or Injury Severity Score, but isolated pelvis fractures had better MFA scores (21.1 vs 35.5, P = 0.008) and worse MFA scores (41.7 vs 29.1, P = 0.004) were seen with other lower extremity fractures. Those with bladder ruptures (n = 6) also had poor outcomes, mean MFA 50.0 (P = 0.078).

CONCLUSIONS

Wide variation is seen in functional outcome of women after high-energy pelvic ring fracture as measured by the MFA with mean scores demonstrating substantial residual dysfunction. Better outcomes were noted after isolated fractures and in women who had not sustained other fractures in their lower extremities. History of bladder rupture or anteroposterior compression injury was associated with poor MFA scores.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Pelvic ring injury is associated with sexual dysfunction in women

OBJECTIVES

Previous studies have reported a negative effect of pelvic trauma on genitourinary and reproductive function of women. However, fracture pattern, injury severity, and final fracture alignment have not been well studied. The purpose of this project was to describe sexual function in women after pelvic ring injury.

DESIGN

Cohort study: a prospective collection of sexual function data for women with prior pelvic ring injury versus control groups of uninjured women and other women from the orthopaedic trauma clinic.

SETTING

Level I trauma center.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

One hundred eighty-seven women younger than age 55 years with pelvic ring injury, including 101 B-type (61-B1: n = 25, B2: n = 69, B3: n = 7) and 86 C-type (61-C1: n = 56, C2: n = 18, C3: n = 12) fractures. Four had open fractures, and 23 had associated genitourinary injury.

INTERVENTION

Seventy-four were treated operatively. Surgical treatment was percutaneous in 62: iliosacral screws (n = 58), external fixation (n = 4), or both (n = 19). Open reduction and internal fixation was performed for the pubis symphysis (n = 27), sacroiliac joint (n = 2), and posterior ileum (n = 3).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Sexual function questionnaires were completed for 92 patients (49%) with minimum 12 months and mean 46 months follow-up.

RESULTS

Forty-eight patients (56%) reported pain with intercourse. Their mean Musculoskeletal Function Assessment was 44.3 versus 20.9 without dyspareunia (P < 0.0001). Seventy-eight percent of patients with B-type fractures and 43% of patients with C-type fractures had dyspareunia (P = 0.002). Dyspareunia occurred after 91% of anteroposterior compression injuries (P = 0.02) and in 79% with a symphyseal disruption treated with plate fixation (P = 0.005). All patients with bladder ruptures (n = 5) reported dyspareunia. Sacral fracture or sacroiliac injury, type of posterior treatment, and residual malalignment of the posterior ring were not associated with dyspareunia. Fourteen patients each had associated femur fractures and/or tibia fractures. Seventeen of them had pain during intercourse (P = 0.19 for association of femoral or tibial fractures with dyspareunia).

CONCLUSIONS

Dyspareunia is common in women after pelvic ring fracture. Women with pelvic ring injury are more likely to report dyspareunia than other female patients with musculoskeletal trauma. Dyspareunia was related to anteroposterior compression and B-type injuries. Symphyseal plate fixation is also associated with dyspareunia. Pain with intercourse was also noted in all patients with a history of bladder rupture. Poor functional outcomes as measured by Musculoskeletal Function Assessment scores were reported in women with dyspareunia.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Lateral compression fractures of the superior pubic ramus with intra-articular extension

A total of 30 patients with lateral compression fractures of the pelvis with intra-articular extension into the anterior column were followed for a mean of 4.2 years (2 to 6), using the validated functional outcome tools of the musculoskeletal function assessment and the short-form health survey (SF-36). The functional outcome was compared with that of a series of patients who had sustained type-B1 and type-C pelvic fractures. The lateral-compression group included 20 men and ten women with a mean age of 42.7 years (13 to 84) at the time of injury. Functional deficits were noted for the mental component summary score (p = 0.008) and in the social function domain (p < 0.05) of the SF-36. There was no evidence of degenerative arthritis in the lateral-compression group. However, they had high functional morbidity including greater emotional and psychological distress.

Case report: locked pubic symphysis: an open reduction technique

A locked pubic symphysis occasionally occurs after a lateral compression injury of the pelvic ring. One pubic bone becomes entrapped behind the contralateral pubis. Lateral compression pelvic injuries are well recognized, but a lateral compression pelvic injury resulting in a locked pubic symphysis is rare. We describe a locked pubic symphysis with greater than 4 cm overlap that was reduced with simple maneuvers and readily available instruments.

Orthogonal pin construct versus parallel uniplanar pin constructs for pelvic external fixation: a biomechanical assessment of stiffness and strength

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to compare the structural stiffness of an orthogonal pelvic external fixator pin construct with 2 different parallel external fixator pin constructs in a simulated bone model.

HYPOTHESIS

An orthogonal pelvic external fixator pin construct would be significantly more stiff than a parallel pin construct when loaded in-plane under similar conditions.

DESIGN

Thirty synthetic pelvic bone models were configured with orthogonal pins (group 1), parallel iliac crest pins (group 2), or parallel supra-acetabular pins (group 3). Specimens were loaded either in-plane (flexion/extension moment) or out-of-plane (internal/external rotation moment) to assess construct stiffness.

SETTING

Orthopaedic industry mechanical testing laboratory (Stryker Orthopedics, Mahwah, NJ).

INTERVENTION

Single load cycle to failure with load application modified to assess stiffness both in-plane and out-of-plane with the pin constructs.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Pelvic external fixation pin construct stiffness.

RESULTS

Stiffness for in-plane loading was 150.2 +/- 51.2 N/mm for the orthogonal pin construct, 105.0 +/- 46.9 N/mm for the iliac crest pin construct, and 104.7 +/- 20.7 N/mm for the supra-acetabular pin construct. Pairwise comparisons demonstrated that the difference was significant (P < 0.05) between groups 1 and 2 and groups 1 and 3 but not between groups 2 and 3. Stiffness for out-of-plane loading was 49.6 +/- 3.4 N/mm for the orthogonal pin construct, 53.9 +/- 3.5 N/mm for the iliac crest pin construct, and 100.6 +/- 4.3 N/mm for the supra-acetabular pin construct, with significant differences (P < 0.05) between groups 1 and 3 and groups 2 and 3 but not between groups 1 and 2.

CONCLUSION

An orthogonal pelvic external fixator pin construct produced a significantly stiffer construct for in-plane loading (flexion/extension moment) compared with either parallel pin construct; however, a parallel supra-acetabular pin construct was stiffer for out-of-plane loading.

Superior pubic ramus fractures fixed with percutaneous screws: what predicts fixation failure?

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to present the early complications of percutaneous screw fixation of superior pubic ramus fractures and to present a new classification scheme for superior pubic ramus fractures.

DESIGN

Retrospective.

SETTING

Level 1 trauma center.

PATIENTS

One hundred and twelve patients with pelvic fracture between the ages of 14 to 89 years underwent percutaneous screw fixation of 145 pubic ramus fractures. Eighty-one patients with 107 surgically repaired fractures were followed to fracture union. Follow-up averaged 9 months (range 2-52 months). One additional patient who sustained fixation failure 4 days after surgery was included to yield a study group of 82 patients with 108 surgically repaired ramus fractures.

INTERVENTION

Patients underwent percutaneous screw fixation of a superior pubic ramus fracture.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Superior pubic ramus fractures were classified according to a new scheme, the Nakatani system, which categorizes superior ramus fractures according to location with respect to the obturator foramen. Patient radiographs were examined for evidence of loss of reduction, defined as any motion at the ramus fracture site or hardware motion, after fracture surgery.

RESULTS

Of the 82 patients followed to union or fixation failure, 12 (15%) had loss of reduction on follow-up radiographs. The average age of patients who lost reduction was 55 years. The most common mechanism of reduction loss was a collapse of the pubic ramus over the screw, with recurrence of an internal rotation deformity of the injured hemipelvis. Ten patients who lost reduction were women, and 11 had undergone ramus screw placement in retrograde fashion. No loss of reduction was seen in Zone III ramus fractures (those that involve the bone lateral to the obturator foramen). No patient sustained recognized neurologic, vascular, or urologic injury as a result of percutaneous screw fixation of a superior pubic ramus fracture.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of loss of reduction after percutaneous screw fixation of pubic ramus fractures is 15%. Loss of reduction is more common in elderly and female patients and in patients whose ramus screws are placed in a retrograde fashion. Also, loss of reduction appears to be more common in fractures medial to the lateral border of the obturator foramen.

Sacroiliac joint compression using an anterior pelvic compressor: a mechanical study in synthetic bone

OBJECTIVES

Pelvic external fixation pins placed in the supraacetabular region, directed posteriorly, and mounted with a femoral distractor as a compressor may impart compression forces across the sacroiliac joint. This would be useful for indirect reduction and stabilization of the posterior pelvis. The purpose of this study was to determine the forces achieved by this construct compared with other forms of fixation.

DESIGN

Mechanical study.

SETTING

University laboratory.

PATIENTS

Synthetic pelvis models.

INTERVENTION

A complete symphyseal and unilateral sacroiliac joint disruption was created in 6 synthetic pelves. Five different fixation constructs were applied, and a pressure-sensitive film (TekScan) was fixed in the sacroiliac joint. Each construct was compressed in a standardized fashion.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

After maximal compression of each trial, the magnitude and regional distribution of the force was recorded.

RESULTS

Standard 2-bar external fixation did not allow for any compression across the sacroiliac joint in any specimen. The pelvic compressor delivered 86.3 N (SD, 12.1 N) of force across the sacroiliac joint when the pins were inserted half way, and 85.8 N (SD, 11.0 N) with full pin insertion. Iliosacral screws led to 145 N of compression on average (SD, 69.9 N), but this was not statistically different from the pelvic compressor groups. A C-clamp generated compression of 206 N (SD, 31.9 N), which was significantly greater than both the pelvic compressor groups (P < 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

A simple modification of pelvic external fixation, placing a femoral distractor as a compressor on supraacetabular pins, allows for indirect medial translation of the innominate bone and compression across the sacroiliac joint. The force achieved is less than with a C-clamp, but it is safer, involves techniques familiar to most surgeons, and may be useful in the acute management of unstable pelvic fractures.

Stabilization of unstable pelvic fractures with supraacetabular compression external fixation

External fixation for pelvic stabilization is an important component of the overall treatment of patients with high-energy pelvic fractures. Traditional constructs include single and multiple pin placements in several locations in each iliac crest. Biomechanical and anatomic studies have focused on pin placement lower on the pelvis, specifically in the supraacetabular region. Pins in this location are more stable biomechanically, allow for pelvic reduction in the transverse plane of deformity, facilitate concurrent or subsequent laparotomy procedures, and may allow improved reduction of the posterior elements with a femoral distractor as a compressor. We describe the technique for placement of supraacetabular external fixation pins, pelvic reduction, and compression using a femoral distractor.

Hemorrhage in pelvic fracture: who needs angiography?

Pelvic fractures are rare but potentially devastating injuries. An understanding of the bony and peripelvic anatomy along with common patterns and the classification of the injury are of critical importance in their management. These form the basis for a general treatment algorithm for pelvic fracture patients. Angiographic embolization is time-consuming and often delayed. Hemodynamic instability with unstable pelvic fracture is therefore best approached with a combination of pelvic emergency stabilization (C-clamp) and surgical hemostasis by pelvic tamponade. This is especially true for critically injured patients in extremis.

Placement of half-pins for supra-acetabular external fixation: an anatomic study

An alternative location for placement of half-pins during pelvic external fixation is the dense supra-acetabular bone in the region of the anterior-inferior iliac spine. Although these fixators have gained popularity, to the authors' knowledge there are no studies evaluating the potential anatomic risks of placement of half-pins in this area; no safe corridors have been defined. Additionally, pins are placed near the hip capsule and no studies exist defining the superior extent of the hip capsule which potentially may be violated by placing half-pins in this location. The purposes of the current study were to evaluate the neurovascular risks and accuracy of fluoroscopically guided percutaneous placement of supra-acetabular half-pins, and to evaluate the anatomic superior extent of the hip capsule. Ten fresh frozen cadaveric pelves were used. A 5-mm half-pin was placed in the supra-acetabular bone under fluoroscopic guidance. Iliofemoral dissection was done and the proximity of the half-pin to local neurovascular risks was measured with a caliper. The hip capsule was exposed and the superior extent of the hip capsule was measured. Intraosseous pin placement was evaluated by direct observation. Nine pins were completely in bone, one had partially exited posteriorly and laterally. The lateral femoral cutaneous nerve was at risk with a mean distance of 10 mm (range, 2-25 mm) from the half-pins. The femoral nerve and femoral artery were not at risk. The average superior extent of the hip capsule was 16 mm above the joint (range, 11-20 mm). Half-pins can be placed accurately and safely in the supra-acetabular region using percutaneous techniques, appropriate soft tissue sleeves, and fluoroscopic guidance. Insertion of pins at least 2 cm above the hip is recommended to avoid potential hip capsule penetration.

High-energy pelvic ring disruptions

High energy pelvic ring disruptions are associated with numerous primary organ system injuries. Early, accurate pelvic reduction and stable fixation optimize patient outcome. A variety of fixation techniques have been advocated. A multispecialty team approach is advantageous when managing these patients and their pelvic injuries.