Intracoronary SIN-1C during reperfusion reduces infarct size in dog

Cardioprotection by sevoflurane against reperfusion injury after cardioplegic arrest in the rat is independent of three types of cardioplegia

BACKGROUND

Sevoflurane protects the heart against reperfusion injury even after cardioplegic arrest. This protection may depend on the cardioplegic solution. Therefore, we investigated the effect of sevoflurane on myocardial reperfusion injury after cardioplegic arrest with University of Wisconsin solution (UW), Bretschneider's cardioplegia (HTK), and St Thomas' Hospital solution (STH).

METHODS

We used an isolated rat heart model where heart rate, ventricular volume, and perfusion pressure were constant. The hearts underwent 30 min of normothermic ischaemia followed by 60 min of reperfusion. Seven groups were studied (n = 9 each). Three groups received 7 degrees C cold cardioplegic solutions (UW, HTK, STH) during the first 2 min of ischaemia at a flow of 2 ml min-1. In three groups (UW + Sevo, HTK + Sevo, STH + Sevo), sevoflurane was additionally added to the perfusion medium (membrane oxygenator) at 3.8% (1.5 MAC) during the first 15 min of reperfusion after cardioplegic arrest. Nine hearts served as untreated control group (control). We measured left ventricular developed pressure (LVDP) and infarct size.

RESULTS

LVDP was similar in all groups during baseline (130 (SEM 2) mm Hg). HTK and STH improved recovery of LVDP during reperfusion from 5 (1) (control) to 67 (7) (HTK) and 52 (8) mm Hg (STH, both P < 0.05), while UW had no effect on myocardial function (7 (2) mm Hg). In the sevoflurane-treated groups, LVDP at the end of the experiments was not significantly different from the respective group without anaesthetic treatment (UW + Sevo 11 (2); HTK + Sevo 83 (8); STH + Sevo 64 (8) mm Hg; P = ns). Infarct size was reduced in the HTK and STH groups (HTK 20 (4); STH 17 (3)%; P < 0.05) compared with controls (39 (5)%; P < 0.05), but not in the UW group (52 (4)%). Compared with cardioplegia alone, sevoflurane treatment during reperfusion reduced infarct size (UW + Sevo 31 (4); HTK + Sevo 8 (1); STH + Sevo 4 (1)%; P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

We conclude, that the protection against reperfusion injury offered by sevoflurane is independent of the three cardioplegic solutions used.

Lidocaine reduces ischaemic but not reperfusion injury in isolated rat heart

The local anaesthetic lidocaine protects the myocardium in ischaemia-reperfusion situations. It is not known if this is the consequence of an anti-ischaemic effect or an effect on reperfusion injury. Therefore, we investigated the effect of two concentrations of lidocaine on myocardial ischaemia-reperfusion injury and on reperfusion injury alone. We used an isolated rat heart model where heart rate, ventricular volume and coronary flow were kept constant. Hearts underwent 45 min of low-flow ischaemia followed by 90 min reperfusion. Two groups received lidocaine 1.7 or 17 microg ml(-1) starting 5 min before the onset of reperfusion. In two additional groups, lidocaine infusion started 5 min before low-flow ischaemia. In all groups, lidocaine administration was stopped after 15 min of reperfusion. One group served as an untreated control (n=11 in each group). Left ventricular developed pressure (LVDP) and total creatine kinase release (CKR) were measured. Lidocaine administration during ischaemia and reperfusion led to an improved recovery of LVDP during reperfusion (1.7 microg ml(-1), 54 (SEM 10) mm Hg; 17 microg ml(-1), 71 (9) mm Hg at 30 min of reperfusion; both significantly different from control (21 (4) mm Hg) (P<0.05)) and a reduced CKR (1.7 microg ml(-1), 79 (13) IU; 17 microg ml(-1), 52 (8) IU at 30 min of reperfusion; both significantly different from control (130 (8) IU (P<0.05)). Lidocaine given during early reperfusion only, affected neither LVDP during reperfusion (1.7 microg ml(-1), 19 (6) mm Hg (P=1.0); 17 microg ml(-1), 36 (8) mm Hg (P=0.46)) nor CKR (156 (21) IU (P=0.50) and 106 (14) IU (P=0.57)). We conclude that lidocaine protects the myocardium against ischaemic but not against reperfusion injury in the isolated rat heart.

Nitric oxide reduces energy supply by direct action on the respiratory chain in isolated cardiomyocytes

To investigate the effect of nitric oxide (NO) on cardiac energy metabolism, isolated cardiomyocytes of Wistar rats were incubated in an Oxystat system at a constant ambient PO2 (25 mmHg) and oxygen consumption (VO2); free intracellular Ca(2+) (fura 2), free cytosolic adenosine [S-adenosylhomocysteine (SAH) method], and mitochondrial NADH (autofluorescence) were measured after application of the NO donor morpholinosydnonimine (SIN-1). In Na(+)-free medium (contracting cardiomyocytes), VO2 increased from 7.9 +/- 1.2 to 26.4 +/- 3.1 nmol x min(-1) x mg protein(-1). SIN-1 (100 micromol/l) decreased VO2 in contracting (-21 +/- 3%) and in quiescent cells (-24 +/- 7%) by the same extent. Inhibition of VO2 was dose dependent (EC(50): 10(-7) mol/l). S-nitroso-N-acetyl-penicillamine, another NO donor, also inhibited VO2, whereas SIN-1C (100 micromol/l), the degradation product of SIN-1, displayed no inhibitory effect. Intracellular Ca(2+) remained unchanged, and inhibition of protein kinases G, A, or C did not antagonize the effect of NO. Mitochondrial NADH increased with NO, indicating a reduced flux through the respiratory chain. In quiescent but not in contracting cardiomyocytes, NO significantly increased adenosine, indicating a reduced energy status. These data suggest the following. 1) NO decreases cardiac respiration, most likely via direct inhibition of the respiratory chain. 2) Whereas in quiescent cardiomyocytes the inhibition of aerobic ATP formation by NO causes reduction in energy status, contracting cells are able to compensate for the NO-induced inhibition of oxidative phosphorylation, maintaining energy status constant.

Potential interactions between iloprost and SIN-1 on platelet aggregation and myocardial infarct size in vivo

Nitric oxide and prostacyclin are endothelial-derived vasodilators which inhibit platelet aggregation in a synergistic manner. Experiments were designed to examine whether 3-morpholino-sydnonimine (SIN-1) and iloprost have synergistic cardioprotective actions and whether their effects on infarct size are related to inhibition of platelet aggregation. Anaesthetized rabbits (n = 9-10 per group) were subject to 40 min myocardial ischaemia followed by 3 h reperfusion. Infarct size (percentage of area at risk) was not altered significantly by 3 microg kg(-1) min(-1) SIN-1 (29.7 +/- 1.9%), but was reduced by 0.03 microg kg(-1) min(-1) iloprost (24.6 +/- 1.6%) and to a greater extent by the combination of SIN-1 and iloprost (18.8 +/- 1.7%), compared to controls (33.6 +/- 4.7%). In control rabbits, there were reductions in the ex vivo aggregation of platelets in response to ADP or collagen after ischaemia and reperfusion. SIN-1 and iloprost caused some alterations in platelet responses, but combined administration of both drugs did not produce greater effects. Although the reduction in myocardial infarct size was greatest with both drugs, this did not appear to be a synergistic interaction and was not dependent on the effects of the drugs on haemodynamics or platelet aggregation.

Effect of acidotic blood reperfusion on reperfusion injury after coronary artery occlusion in the dog heart

A prolongation of the intracellular acidosis after myocardial ischemia can protect the myocardium against reperfusion injury. In isolated hearts, this was achieved by prolongation of the extracellular acidosis. The aim of this study was to investigate whether regional reperfusion with acidotic blood after coronary artery occlusion can reduce infarct size and improve myocardial function in vivo. Anesthetized open-chest dogs were instrumented for measurement of regional myocardial function, assessed by sonomicrometry as systolic wall thickening (sWT). Infarct size was determined by triphenyltetrazolium staining after 3 h of reperfusion. The left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) was perfused through a bypass from the left carotid artery. The animals underwent 1 h of LAD occlusion and subsequent bypass-reperfusion with normal blood (control, n = 6) or blood equilibrated to pH = 6.8 by using 0.1 mM HCl during the first 30 min of reperfusion (HCl, n = 5). Regional collateral blood flow (RCBF) at 30-min occlusion was measured by using colored microspheres. There was no difference in recovery of sWT in the LAD-perfused area between the two groups at the end of the experiments [-2.8+/-1.2% (HCl) vs. -4.4+/-2.5% (control); mean +/- SEM; p = NS]. RCBF was comparable in both groups. Infarct size (percentage of area at risk) was reduced in the treatment group (12.8+/-2.8%) compared with the control group (26.2+/-4.8%; p < 0.05). These results indicate that reperfusion injury after coronary artery occlusion can be reduced by a prolonged local extracellular acidosis in vivo.

Infusions with molsidomine and isosorbide-5-mononitrate in congestive heart failure: mechanisms underlying attenuation of effects

The use of nitrates for treatment of heart failure is encumbered by tolerance, caused by whatever mechanism, which has been reported only in a few instances with sydnonimines. Accordingly, we compared molsidomine (6 mg/h) and isosorbide-5-mononitrate (3.75 mg/h) with respect to maximal hemodynamic effects, rapidity and extent of attenuation, and underlying mechanisms by means of constant infusions over 24 h each in 15 patients with chronic congestive heart failure (NYHA II-III) with a placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized, crossover protocol. Hemodynamic measurements and determinations of neurohormones were performed at baseline and at 2, 8, and 24 h after the beginning of infusions. With molsidomine, reductions of diastolic pulmonary artery pressure by 29% (p < 0.001), by 24% (p < 0.01), and by 24% (p < 0.01) versus placebo were found at 2, 8, and 24 h, which amounted to 19% (p < 0.01), 10% (NS), and 14% (NS) with the nitrate. Cardiac output was meaningfully affected only with molsidomine (+5%, NS, at 2 h; +9%, p < 0.05, at 8 h; and +15%, p < 0.05, at 24 h), as was systemic vascular resistance (-13%, p < 0.05; -9%, NS; and -18%, p < 0.01) at the corresponding times. Increases in renin activity amounted to 130% (p < 0.001), 117% (p < 0.001), and 112% (p < 0.001) with molsidomine, and to 14, 16%, and 0 (each NS) with the nitrate at the corresponding times. Hematocrit was reduced by 5% (p < 0.001), 7% (p < 0.001), and 12% (p < 0.01) with molsidomine and by 5% (NS), 5% (p < 0.05), and 5% (NS) with the nitrate. We conclude that neurohumoral counterregulation or fluid shift, which is even more pronounced with molsidomine despite longer-lasting effects, has no essential role in nitrate-tolerance development. With molsidomine, such a role cannot be ruled out, although alternatively, a fluid shift from arterial to the low-pressure arm of circulation during the later course of infusion would be even more likely.

Clinical comparison of antiischemic efficacy of isosorbide dinitrate and molsidomine

In 16 patients with documented coronary artery disease, the extent and duration of acute antiischemic and hemodynamic effects of monotherapies with 120 mg of sustained-release isosorbide dinitrate once daily and 8 mg of sustained-release molsidomine 3 times daily were compared according to a randomized, double-blind, cross-over and placebo-controlled protocol including exercise testing for assessment of ST-segment depression (ST) at an identical workload and determination of plasma concentrations of both substances. Up to 8 h after dosing in the morning, more marked and sustained effects were observed with the nitrate (ST at 2 h, -82%; p < 0.001; at 8 h, -64%; p < 0.01) than with molsidomine (2 h, -68%; p < 0.001; at 8 h, -9%; NS). At 12 h, no more meaningful actions were detectable with isosorbide dinitrate (-13%, NS) despite plasma concentrations still within a range otherwise considered therapeutically effective, whereas with molsidomine, at 4 h after renewed dosing, this parameter was reduced by 38% (p < 0.01). However, therapeutic coverage over a 24-h period could be demonstrated on neither regimen, in the case of the nitrate because of the development of early tolerance, and in the case of molsidomine with its meaningfully shorter half-life because of the necessity of increasing the dosing frequency even further. No meaningful adverse effects were observed with either regimen. Nonresponders, overall a minority on one treatment, responded completely to the alternative regimen and vice versa.

Carvedilol protects against lethal reperfusion injury through antiadrenergic mechanisms

We examined the effect of carvedilol as compared with that of a combination of propranolol and doxazosin on lethal reperfusion injury in 21 feline hearts subjected to 40-min regional ischemia and 180-min reperfusion. A control group (n = 7) was compared with one group given carvedilol, a nonselective beta - and alpha 1-adrenoceptor blocker and antioxidant (n = 7) and another group given nonselective beta - and alpha 1-adrenoceptor blockade with propranolol and doxazosin (n = 7) during initial reperfusion. Infarct size (IS: percent of area at risk, AAR) determined by staining the myocardium with triphenyl tetrazolium chloride (TTC), was reduced both in the carvedilol-treated group (median 1.8%, p < 0.05) and in the group given propranolol/doxazosin (median 6.5%, p < 0.05) as compared with controls (median 14.4%). Treatment with carvedilol reduced IS more than did treatment with propranolol/doxazosin (p < 0.05). Longitudinal segment shortening measured with sonomicrometry, improved in both treatment groups as compared with control (p < 0.05), but to a greater extent in the group treated with carvedilol. In circumferential segments, only carvedilol significantly improved segment shortening. The incidence of ventricular fibrillation (VF) after reperfusion was reduced in both treatment groups as compared with control. Oxidized glutathione and thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances (TBARS) measured at the end of reperfusion did not differ between groups. Carvedilol protected against lethal reperfusion injury mainly through blockade of adrenoceptors.