Selective A2A adenosine receptor agonist as a coronary vasodilator in conscious dogs: potential for use in myocardial perfusion imaging

The Hydrazine Moiety in the Synthesis of Modified Nucleosides and Nucleotides

Synthetic nucleoside mimics are re-emerging as crucial contenders for antiviral and anticancer medications. While, Ribavirin stands out for its unique antiviral properties, predominantly associated with its distinctive triazole heterocycle as a nucleobase, the exploration of alternative nitrogen-based aromatic heterocycles hold great promises for the discovery of novel bioactive nucleoside mimics. Although nucleoside derivatives synthesized from hydrazine-ribose units have been in development for many decades, they have been little evaluated biologically and even less for their antiviral properties. With the aim of taking a closer look at these under-explored derivatives and investigating their synthetic pathways, this review provides an overview of the molecular design, the chemical synthesis, and the biological activity, when available, of these nucleoside analogues. Overall, the entire body of work already done motivates further exploration of these analogues and encourages us of formulating structurally novel nucleoside drug candidates featuring innovative mode of action.

How to assess nonresponsiveness to vasodilator stress

Myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) is a powerful tool for the functional assessment of ischemia in patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease (CAD). Given that the diagnostic accuracy and prognostic value of MPI and post-test management are highly dependent on achieving an adequate stress vasodilatory response, it is critical to identify those who may not have adequately responded to vasodilator pharmacological stress agents such as adenosine, dipyridamole, and regadenoson. Caffeine, a potent inhibitor of the adenosine receptor, is a compound that can affect vasodilatory hemodynamics, result in false negative studies, and potentially alter management in cases of inaccurate test results. Vasodilator non-responsiveness can be suspected by examining hemodynamics, quantitative positron emission tomography (PET) metrics such as myocardial flow reserve (MFR), and splenic response to stress. Quantitative MFR values of 1-1.2 should raise suspicion for nonresponsiveness in the setting of normal perfusion, along with the absence of a splenic switch off. Newer metrics, such as splenic response ratio, can be used to aid in the identification of potential nonresponders to pharmacologic vasodilators.

Comparative efficacy and safety of adenosine and regadenoson for assessment of fractional flow reserve: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Adenosine is a coronary hyperemic agent used to measure invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR) of intermediate severity coronary stenosis.

AIM

To compare FFR assessment using adenosine with an alternate hyperemic agent, regadenoson.

METHODS

PubMed, Google Scholar, CINAHL and Cochrane databases were queried for studies comparing adenosine and regadenoson for assessment of FFR. Data on FFR, correlation coefficient and adverse events from the selected studies were extracted and analyzed by means of random effects model. Two tailed P-value less than 0.05 was considered significant. Heterogeneity was assessed using I² test.

RESULTS

Five studies with 248 patients were included in the final analysis. All included patients and coronary lesions underwent FFR assessment using both adenosine and regadenoson. There was no significant mean difference between FFR measurement by the two agents [odds ratio (OR) = -0.00; 95% confidence interval (CI): (-0.02)-0.01, P = 0.88]. The cumulative correlation coefficient was 0.98 (0.96-0.99, P < 0.01). Three of five studies reported time to FFR with cumulative results favoring regadenoson (mean difference 34.31 s; 25.14-43.48 s, P < 0.01). Risk of adverse events was higher with adenosine compared to regadenoson (OR = 2.39; 95%CI: 1.22-4.67, P = 0.01), which most commonly included bradycardia and hypotension. Vast majority of the adverse events associated with both agents were transient.

CONCLUSION

The performance of regadenoson in inducing maximal hyperemia was comparable to that of adenosine. There was excellent correlation between the FFR measurements by both the agents. The use of adenosine, was however associated with higher risk of adverse events and longer time to FFR compared to regadenoson.

Advances in Myocardial Perfusion MR Imaging: Physiological Implications, the Importance of Quantitative Analysis, and Impact on Patient Care in Coronary Artery Disease

Stress myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) is the preferred test in patients with intermediate-to-high clinical likelihood of coronary artery disease (CAD) and can be used as a gatekeeper to avoid unnecessary revascularization. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) has a number of favorable characteristics, including: (1) high spatial resolution that can delineate subendocardial ischemia; (2) comprehensive assessment of morphology, global and regional cardiac functions, tissue characterization, and coronary artery stenosis; and (3) no radiation exposure to patients. According to meta-analysis studies, the diagnostic accuracy of perfusion CMR is comparable to positron emission tomography (PET) and perfusion CT, and is better than single-photon emission CT (SPECT) when fractional flow reserve (FFR) is used as a reference standard. In addition, stress CMR has an excellent prognostic value. One meta-analysis study demonstrated the annual event rate of cardiovascular death or non-fatal myocardial infarction was 4.9% and 0.8%, respectively, in patients with positive and negative stress CMR. Quantitative assessment of perfusion CMR not only allows the objective evaluation of regional ischemia but also provides insights into the pathophysiology of microvascular disease and diffuse subclinical atherosclerosis. For accurate quantification of myocardial perfusion, saturation correction of arterial input function is important. There are two major approaches for saturation correction, one is a dual-bolus method and the other is a dual-sequence method. Absolute quantitative mapping with myocardial perfusion CMR has good accuracy in detecting coronary microvascular dysfunction. Flow measurement in the coronary sinus (CS) with phase contrast cine CMR is an alternative approach to quantify global coronary flow reserve (CFR). The measurement of global CFR by quantitative analysis of perfusion CMR or flow measurement in the CS permits assessment of microvascular disease and diffuse subclinical atherosclerosis, which may provide improved prediction of future event risk in patients with suspected or known CAD. Multi-institutional studies to validate the diagnostic and prognostic values of quantitative perfusion CMR approaches are required.

Quantitative myocardial perfusion response to adenosine and regadenoson in patients with suspected coronary artery disease

BACKGROUND

The aim of the present study was to compare the quantitative flow responses of regadenoson against adenosine using cardiac 15O-water PET imaging in patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease (CAD).

METHODS

Hyperemic myocardial blood flow (MBF) after adenosine and regadenoson was compared using correlation and Bland-Altman analysis in 21 patients who underwent rest and adenosine 15O-water PET scans followed by rest and regadenoson 15O-water PET scans.

RESULTS

Global mean (± SD) MBF values at rest and stress were 0.92 ± 0.27 and 2.68 ± 0.80 mL·g·min for the adenosine study and 0.95 ± 0.29 and 2.76 ± 0.79 mL·g·min for the regadenoson study (P = 0.55 and P = 0.49). The correlations between global and regional adenosine- and regadenoson-based stress MBF were strong (r = 0.80 and r = 0.77). The biases were small for both global and regional MBF comparisons (0.08 and 0.09 mL·min·g), but the limits of agreement were wide for stress MBF.

CONCLUSION

The correlation between regadenoson- and adenosine-induced hyperemic MBF was strong but the agreement was only moderate indicating that established cut-off values for 150-water PET should be used cautiously if using regadenoson as vasodilator.

Regadenoson versus dipyridamole: Evaluation of stress myocardial blood flow response on a CZT-SPECT camera

BACKGROUND

Regadenoson is a selective adenosine receptor agonist. It is currently unclear if the level of hyperemia differs between stress agents. We compared Myocardial Blood Flow (MBF) and Myocardial Flow Reserve (MFR) response on CZT-SPECT Myocardial Perfusion Imaging (MPI) to evaluate if dipyridamole and regadenoson could induce the same level of hyperemia.

METHODS

228 patients with dynamic CZT-SPECT MPI were retrospectively analyzed (66 patients stressed with regadenoson and 162 with dipyridamole) in terms of MBF and MFR. To rule out confounding factors, two groups of 41 patients were matched for clinical characteristics in a sub-analysis, excluding high cardiovascular risk patients.

RESULTS

Overall stress MBF was higher in regadenoson patients (1.71 ± 0.73 vs. 1.44 ± 0.55 mL·min-1·g-1 for regadenoson and dipyridamole, respectively, p < .05). However, when confounding factors were ruled out, stress MBF (1.57 ± 0.56 vs. 1.61 ± 0.62 mL·min-1·g-1 for dipyridamole and regadenoson, respectively, p = .88) and MFR (2.62 ± 0.77 vs. 2.46 ± 0.76 for dipyridamole and regadenoson, respectively, p = .40) were not different between regadenoson and dipyridamole.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that dipyridamole and regadenoson induce equivalent hyperemia in dynamic SPECT with similar stress MBF and MFR in comparable patients.

Regadenoson Stress Testing: A Comprehensive Review With a Focused Update

Regadenoson is a pharmacological stress agent that has been widely used since its approval by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2008. For many years, dipyridamole and adenosine, which are non-selective adenosine receptor agonists, were more popular. However, these agents are less preferred now due to their undesirable adverse effects as compared to regadenoson. In the ADVANCE (ADenoscan Versus regAdenosoN Comparative Evaluation) phase 3 clinical trial, regadenoson demonstrated non-inferiority to adenosine for detecting reversible myocardial ischemia. This review summarizes the clinical utilities of regadenoson as the most widely used pharmacological stress agent. Moreover, the use of regadenoson has been documented in specific patient populations. Although regadenoson has established safety and efficacy in most patients with chronic diseases, there are equivocal results in the literature for other chronic diseases. It is warranted to highlight that the use of regadenoson has not been studied in patients of low socioeconomic class; it is a condition that carries a significant burden on the cardiovascular system.

Geoffrey Burnstock - An accidental pharmacologist

Geoffrey Burnstock, the founder of the field of purinergic signaling research passed away in Melbourne, Australia on June 3rd, 2020, at the age of 91. With his death, the world of biomedical research lost one of its most passionate, creative and unconventional thought leaders. He was an inspiration to the many researchers he interacted with for more than 50 years and a frequent irritation to those in the administrative establishment. Geoff never considered himself a pharmacologist having being trained as a zoologist and becoming an autonomic neurophysiologist based on his evolving interests in systems and disease-related research. By the end of his life he had: published some 1550 papers; been cited more than 125,000 times; had an h-index of 156 and had supervised over 100 Ph.D. students. His indelible legacy, based on a holistic, data-based, multidisciplinary, unconventional "outside the box" approach to research was reflected in two of the seminal findings in late 20th century biomedical research: the purinergic neurotransmitter hypothesis and the concept of co-neurotransmission, both of which were initially received by his peers with considerable skepticism that at times verged on disdain. Nonetheless, while raising hackles and threatening the status quo, Geoff persevered and prevailed, becoming a mentor for several generations of biomedical researchers. In this review we provide a joint perspective on Geoff Burnstock's legacy in research.

Adenosine as a Marker and Mediator of Cardiovascular Homeostasis: A Translational Perspective

Adenosine, a purine nucleoside, is produced broadly and implicated in the homeostasis of many cells and tissues. It signals predominantly via 4 purinergic adenosine receptors (ADORs) - ADORA1, ADORA2A, ADORA2B and ADOosine signaling, both through design as specific ADOR agonists and antagonists and as offtarget effects of existing anti-platelet medications. Despite this, adenosine has yet to be firmly established as either a therapeutic or a prognostic tool in clinical medicine to date. Herein, we provide a bench-to-bedside review of adenosine biology, highlighting the key considerations for further translational development of this proRA3 in addition to non-ADOR mediated effects. Through these signaling mechanisms, adenosine exerts effects on numerous cell types crucial to maintaining vascular homeostasis, especially following vascular injury. Both in vitro and in vivo models have provided considerable insights into adenosine signaling and identified targets for therapeutic intervention. Numerous pharmacologic agents have been developed that modulate adenmising molecule.

Detrimental effects of nitroglycerin use during regadenoson vasodilator stress testing: A cautionary tale

Vasodilator agents such as adenosine and regadenoson are commonly used pharmacologic stressors to assess for ischemia in patients undergoing myocardial perfusion studies. The recommended reversal agent for this mode of stress is aminophylline, although nitroglycerin is commonly administered as an attempt to reverse the symptoms or electrocardiographic (EKG) changes during the stress test. We demonstrate through two cases that incorrect administration of nitroglycerin can induce hypotension and worsen coronary steal, whereas appropriate administration of aminophylline can reverse the effects of pharmacologic vasodilators. While nitroglycerin is often used in patients with organic angina, it has the potential to worsen ischemia in the setting of pharmacologic vasodilator administration. These cases underscore the importance of administering the correct reversal agent for pharmacologic stress tests.

Impact of pharmacological stress agent on patient motion during rubidium-82 myocardial perfusion PET/CT

BACKGROUND

Patient motion has been demonstrated to have a significant impact on the quality and accuracy of rubidium-82 myocardial perfusion PET/CT. This study aimed to investigate the effect on patient motion of two pharmacological stressing agents, adenosine and regadenoson.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Dynamic data were retrospectively analyzed in 90 patients undergoing adenosine (n = 30), incremental adenosine (n = 30), or regadenoson (n = 30) rubidium-82 myocardial perfusion PET/CT. Severity of motion was scored qualitatively using a four-point (0-3) scale and quantitatively using frame-to-frame pixel shifts. The type of motion, returning or non-returning, and the frame in which it occurred were also recorded. There were significant differences in both the qualitative and quantitative scores comparing regadenoson to adenosine (P = .025 and P < .001) and incremental adenosine (P = .014, P = .015), respectively. The difference in scores between adenosine and incremental adenosine was not significant. Where motion was present, significantly more adenosine patients were classed as non-returning (P = .018). The median frames for motion occurring were 12 for regadenoson and 14 for both adenosine cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

The choice of stressing protocol impacts significantly on patient motion. Patients stressed with regadenoson have significantly lower motion scores than those stressed with adenosine, using local protocols. This motion is more likely to be associated with a drift of the heart away from a baseline position, coinciding with the termination of infusion.

Comparison of regadenoson and nitroprusside to adenosine for measurement of fractional flow reserve: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

FFR is useful in defining the physiological significance of intermediate coronary stenosis and requires induction of maximal hyperemia and measurement of pressure proximal and distal to the stenosis. Hyperemia normally is induced by either IV or IC adenosine, a medication associated with short-term side effects. IV regadenoson and IC nitroprusside have been suggested as viable alternatives. This meta-analysis aims to identify all studies comparing use of intravenous (IV) regadenoson or intracoronary (IC) nitroprusside with IV adenosine to determine differences related to the agent utilized for assessment of fractional flow reserve (FFR).

METHODS

We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, SCOPUS, ClinicalTrials.gov and the Cochrane Library databases for studies comparing IV regadenoson or IC nitroprusside to IV adenosine for FFR assessment. The main outcome was difference in mean FFR measurement. The main secondary outcomes were composite side-effect profile and reclassification of lesions.

RESULTS

Seven studies were included in the analysis, with a total of 375 patients. Compared to IV adenosine, there was no difference in the mean FFR derived from IV regadenoson (p=1.0) or IC nitroprusside (p=0.48). IV regadenoson was associated with 53% lower risk of pooled side effects compared to IV adenosine (p=0.05). IC nitroprusside was associated with 97% lower risk of pooled side effects compared to IV adenosine (p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

IV regadenoson and IC nitroprusside produce similar pressure-derived FFR measurements compared to IV adenosine and have a favorable side effect profile. Both can be considered as alternative agents to IV adenosine for FFR measurement. Further clinical validation is warranted.

Effects of caffeine intake prior to stress cardiac magnetic resonance perfusion imaging on regadenoson- versus adenosine-induced hyperemia as measured by T1 mapping

The antagonistic effects of caffeine on adenosine receptors are a possible cause of false-negative stress perfusion imaging. The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of coffee intake <4 h prior to stress perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) in regadenoson- versus adenosine-induced hyperemia as measured with T1-mapping. 98 consecutive patients with suspected coronary artery disease referred for either adenosine or regadenoson perfusion CMR were included in this analysis. Twenty-four patients reported coffee consumption <4 h before CMR (15 patients with adenosine, and 9 patients with regadenoson); 74 patients reported no coffee intake (50 patients with adenosine, and 24 patients with regadenoson). T1 mapping was performed using a modified look-locker inversion recovery sequence. T1 reactivity was determined by subtracting T1_rest from T1_stress. T1_rest, T1_stress, and T1 reactivity in patients referred for regadenoson perfusion CMR were not significantly different when comparing patients with <4 h coffee intake and patients who reported no coffee intake (976 ± 4 ms, 1019 ± 48 ms, and 4.4 ± 3.2% vs 971 ± 33 ms, 1023 ± 43 ms, and 5.4 ± 2.4%) (p = 0.70, 0.79, and 0.40), and similar to values in patients without coffee intake undergoing adenosine CMR. In patients with <4 h coffee intake, T1_stress, and T1 reactivity were significantly lower for adenosine (898 ± 51 ms, and −7.8 ± 5.0%) compared to regadenoson perfusion CMR (p < 0.001). Coffee intake <4 h prior to regadenoson perfusion CMR has no effect on stress-induced hyperemia as measured with T1 mapping.

Arterial CO2 as a Potent Coronary Vasodilator: A Preclinical PET/MR Validation Study with Implications for Cardiac Stress Testing

Myocardial blood flow (MBF) is the critical determinant of cardiac function. However, its response to increases in partial pressure of arterial CO₂ (PaCO₂), particularly with respect to adenosine, is not well characterized because of challenges in blood gas control and limited availability of validated approaches to ascertain MBF in vivo. Methods: By prospectively and independently controlling PaCO₂ and combining it with ¹³N-ammonia PET measurements, we investigated whether a physiologically tolerable hypercapnic stimulus (∼25 mm Hg increase in PaCO₂) can increase MBF to that observed with adenosine in 3 groups of canines: without coronary stenosis, subjected to non-flow-limiting coronary stenosis, and after preadministration of caffeine. The extent of effect on MBF due to hypercapnia was compared with adenosine. Results: In the absence of stenosis, mean MBF under hypercapnia was 2.1 ± 0.9 mL/min/g and adenosine was 2.2 ± 1.1 mL/min/g; these were significantly higher than at rest (0.9 ± 0.5 mL/min/g, P < 0.05) and were not different from each other (P = 0.30). Under left-anterior descending coronary stenosis, MBF increased in response to hypercapnia and adenosine (P < 0.05, all territories), but the effect was significantly lower than in the left-anterior descending coronary territory (with hypercapnia and adenosine; both P < 0.05). Mean perfusion defect volumes measured with adenosine and hypercapnia were significantly correlated (R = 0.85) and were not different (P = 0.12). After preadministration of caffeine, a known inhibitor of adenosine, resting MBF decreased; and hypercapnia increased MBF but not adenosine (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Arterial blood CO₂ tension when increased by 25 mm Hg can induce MBF to the same level as a standard dose of adenosine. Prospectively targeted arterial CO₂ has the capability to evolve as an alternative to current pharmacologic vasodilators used for cardiac stress testing.

New Trends in Radionuclide Myocardial Perfusion Imaging

Radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) with single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) has been widely used clinically as one of the major functional imaging modalities for patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) for decades. Ample evidence has supported the use of MPI as a useful and important tool in the diagnosis, risk stratification and treatment planning for CAD. Although popular in the United States, MPI has become the most frequently used imaging modality among all nuclear medicine tests in Taiwan. However, it should be acknowledged that MPI SPECT does have its limitations. These include false-positive results due to certain artifacts, false-negative due to balanced ischemia, complexity and adverse reaction arising from current pharmacological stressors, time consuming nature of the imaging procedure, no blood flow quantitation and relatively high radiation exposure. The purpose of this article was to review the recent trends in nuclear cardiology, including the utilization of positron emission tomography (PET) for MPI, new stressor, new SPECT camera with higher resolution and higher sensitivity, dynamic SPECT protocol for blood flow quantitation, new software of phase analysis for evaluation of LV dyssynchrony, and measures utilized for reducing radiation exposure of MPI.

KEY WORDS

Coronary artery disease • Myocardial flow reserve • Myocardial perfusion imaging • Phase analysis • PET • SPECT.

Regadenoson stress for myocardial perfusion imaging

Noninvasive functional imaging plays a major role in the diagnosis of hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease (CAD) by means of the detection of abnormal myocardial perfusion. For this, cardiac stressors are essential as they induce hypoperfusion in the presence of flow-limiting coronary stenosis. Several pharmacological stressors are currently available and it is important that clinicians who are involved in the care and management of patients with CAD become familiar with their indications, contraindications and protocols. Among the primary coronary vasodilator agents, regadenoson is increasingly used as the default stressor or as an alternative to other modalities of stress. This article provides an updated review of regadenoson stress for the assessment of patients with suspected or known CAD and describes its pharmacological properties, stress protocol, efficacy and safety profile.

The prognostic value of regadenoson myocardial perfusion imaging

BACKGROUND

Regadenoson (REGA), a selective adenosine A2A receptor agonist, is the most widely used stress agent for SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) in the United States. The diagnostic accuracy of REGA MPI is comparable to Adenosine MPI, but its prognostic value is not well defined.

METHODS

We categorized 1,400 patients (700 consecutive normal and 700 consecutive abnormal REGA-MPIs) into 4 groups based on the perfusion defect size using automated quantitative analysis: Group 1: normal perfusion; Group 2: <10% of left ventricle; Group 3: 10%-20%; Group 4: >20%. The primary outcome was a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), and late coronary revascularization (CR >90 days after MPI).

RESULTS

Of the 1,400 patients (42% male, 37% diabetes, 21% heart failure, 26% end-stage renal disease), the primary outcome occurred in 23% (17% cardiac death, 4% MI, 6% late CR) during 46 ± 18 months of follow-up and 8% had early CR (within 90 days of MPI). Early CR occurred in 0.4%, 9%, 17%, and 17% and the primary outcome in 10%, 27%, 31%, and 43% in Groups 1-4, respectively (P < .001 for both). In an adjusted Cox proportional model, the hazard ratio for the primary outcome was 2.68 (1.77-4.06), 3.32 (2.28-4.83), and 4.05 (2.78-5.91) for Groups 2-4 compared to Group 1.

CONCLUSION

REGA MPI provides powerful prognostic information that has important implications in patient management and can guide clinical practice.

Regadenoson use in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: the state of current knowledge

Stress testing is challenging in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Functional capacity is generally decreased in this patient population, limiting patients’ ability to achieve physiologic stress through exercise. Additionally, due to emphysematous changes, COPD patients tend to have poor acoustic windows that impair the quality and therefore diagnostic accuracy of stress echocardiography techniques. Pharmacologic stress myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) testing is also problematic, particularly due to the concern for adenosine-induced bronchoconstriction with conventional vasodilator stress agents. Regadenoson, a selective A_2A adenosine receptor agonist, has gained popularity due to its ease of administration and improved patient experience in the general population. The literature describing the experience with regadenoson in COPD patients, though limited, is rapidly growing and reassuring. This review summarizes the pharmacology and clinical application of this novel stress agent and presents the available data on the safety and tolerability of its use in COPD patients.

Regadenoson in Europe: first-year experience of regadenoson stress combined with submaximal exercise in patients undergoing myocardial perfusion scintigraphy

Purpose

Regadenoson was approved for clinical use in Europe in 2011. Since then, it has become the default form of stress at our institution. We have assessed the side-effect profile and tolerability of regadenoson in patients undergoing clinically indicated myocardial perfusion scintigraphy between July 2011 and July 2012.

Methods

Clinical, stress and imaging data were recorded prospectively. Symptoms during stress were recorded and defined as mild, moderate or severe. An adverse event was defined as any symptom that persisted for more than 30 min or that required investigation or treatment.

Results

Of 1,764 consecutive patients, 1,581 (90 %) received regadenoson combined with submaximal exercise unless contraindicated. Symptoms were common (63 %) but transient and well-tolerated. The severity of symptoms was recorded in most patients as mild (84 %). Dyspnoea (36 %) and chest discomfort (12 %) were the commonest side effects. Adverse events were reported in eight patients (0.5 %), thought to be vasovagal in seven of these. All patients recovered fully without sequelae. There were no deaths, myocardial infarction or hospital admissions. Regadenoson stress was performed in 206 patients (12 %) with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) without bronchospasm or any other major side effect.

Conclusion

We studied the symptom profile of regadenoson in the largest European cohort to date. Regadenoson combined with submaximal exercise was well tolerated, notably also in patients with asthma or COPD. The majority of regadenoson-related adverse events were vasovagal episodes without sequelae.

Regadenoson and adenosine are equivalent vasodilators and are superior than dipyridamole- a study of first pass quantitative perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance

BACKGROUND

Regadenoson, dipyridamole and adenosine are commonly used vasodilators in myocardial perfusion imaging for the detection of obstructive coronary artery disease. There are few comparative studies of the vasodilator properties of regadenoson, adenosine and dipyridamole in humans. The specific aim of this study was to determine the relative potency of these three vasodilators by quantifying stress and rest myocardial perfusion in humans using cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR).

METHODS

Fifteen healthy normal volunteers, with Framingham score less than 1% underwent vasodilator stress testing with regadenoson (400 μg bolus), dipyridamole (0.56 mg/kg) and adenosine (140 μg /kg/min) on separate days. Rest perfusion imaging was performed initially. Twenty minutes later, stress imaging was performed at peak vasodilation, i.e. 70 seconds after regadenoson, 4 minutes after dipyridamole infusion and between 3-4 minutes of the adenosine infusion. Myocardial blood flow (MBF) in ml/min/g and myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR) were quantified using a fully quantitative model constrained deconvolution.

RESULTS

Regadenoson produced higher stress MBF than dipyridamole and adenosine (3.58 ± 0.58 vs. 2.81 ± 0.67 vs. 2.78 ± 0.61 ml/min/g, p = 0.0009 and p = 0.0008 respectively). Regadenoson had a much higher heart rate response than adenosine and dipyridamole respectively (95 ± 11 vs. 76 ± 13 vs. 86 ± 12 beats/ minute) When stress MBF was adjusted for heart rate, there were no differences between regadenoson and adenosine (37.8 ± 6 vs. 36.6 ± 4 μl/sec/g, p = NS), but differences between regadenoson and dipyridamole persisted (37.8 ± 6 vs. 32.6 ± 5 μl/sec/g, p = 0.03). The unadjusted MPR was higher with regadenoson (3.11 ± 0.63) when compared with adenosine (2.7 ± 0.61, p = 0.02) and when compared with dipyridamole (2.61 ± 0.57, p = 0.04). Similar to stress MBF, these differences in MPR between regadenoson and adenosine were abolished when adjusted for heart rate (2.04 ± 0.34 vs. 2.12 ± 0.27, p = NS), but persisted between regadenoson and dipyridamole (2.04 ± 0.34 vs. 1.77 ± 0.33, p = 0.07) and between adenosine and dipyridamole (2.12 ± 0.27 vs. 1.77 ± 0.33, p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on fully quantitative perfusion using CMR, regadenoson and adenosine have similar vasodilator efficacy and are superior to dipyridamole.

Detection of obstructive coronary artery disease using regadenoson stress and 82Rb PET/CT myocardial perfusion imaging

Our objective was to study the diagnostic performance of regadenoson (82)Rb myocardial perfusion PET imaging to detect obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD).

METHODS

We studied 134 patients (mean age, 63 ± 12 y; mean body mass index, 31 ± 9 kg/m(2)) without known CAD (96 with coronary angiography and 38 with low pretest likelihood of CAD). Stress left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) minus rest LVEF defined LVEF reserve. The Duke score was used to estimate the anatomic extent of jeopardized myocardium.

RESULTS

Regadenoson PET had a high sensitivity, 92% (95% confidence interval [CI], 83%-97%), in detecting obstructive CAD, with a normalcy rate of 97% (95% CI, 86%-99%), specificity of 77% (54/70 patients; 95% CI, 66%-86%), and area under the receiver-operator-characteristic curve of 0.847 (95% CI, 0.774-0.903; P < 0.001). Regadenoson PET demonstrated high sensitivity to detect CAD in patients with single-vessel CAD (89%; 95% CI, 70%-98%). The mean LVEF reserve was significantly higher in patients with normal myocardial perfusion imaging results (6.5% ± 5.4%) than in those with mild (4.3 ± 5.1, P = 0.03) and moderate to severe reversible defects (-0.2% ± 8.4%, P = 0.001). Also, mean LVEF reserve was significantly higher in patients with a low likelihood of CAD (7.2% ± 4.5%, P < 0.0001) and mild or moderate jeopardized myocardium than in those with significant jeopardized myocardium (score ≥ 6), -2.8% ± 8.3%.

CONCLUSION

Regadenoson (82)Rb myocardial perfusion imaging is accurate for the detection of obstructive CAD. LVEF reserve is high in patients without significant ischemia or significant angiographic jeopardized myocardium.

Regadenoson: review of its established role in myocardial perfusion imaging and emerging applications

Myocardial perfusion imaging is a well-established noninvasive modality for the diagnosis and prognosis of coronary artery disease. The pharmacologic stress agents adenosine and dipyridamole are widely used in imaging studies, but cause undesirable side effects, like atrioventricular block and bronchospasm, due to their nonselective adenosine receptor activation. Furthermore, the mode of administration of these agents as a bolus infusion is less preferred. Regadenoson, an A2A adenosine receptor selective pharmacologic stress agent was approved in 2008 and is widely used instead of adenosine and dipyridamole. This article reviews regadenosons structure, mechanism of action, advantages over adenosine and dipyridamole, and its role in various patient populations undergoing stress perfusion imaging. Emerging applications where regadenoson could be of potential use are also explored.

Clinical utility of regadenoson for assessing fractional flow reserve

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of regadenoson, in comparison with adenosine, for assessing fractional flow reserve (FFR) of intermediate coronary artery stenoses (CAS).

BACKGROUND

Fractional flow reserve is an established invasive method for assessing the physiological significance of CAS. Regadenoson, a selective A(2A) receptor agonist, is an approved hyperemic agent for pharmacological stress imaging, but its role for measuring FFR is unknown.

METHODS

This prospective, single-center study enrolled 25 consecutive patients with intermediate CAS discovered during elective angiography (25 lesions). In each patient, FFR of the CAS was measured first by IV adenosine (140 μg/kg/min), followed by IV regadenoson (400 μg bolus). The intrapatient FFR correlation between adenosine and regadenoson was evaluated.

RESULTS

The mean age was 63 ± 11 years, and mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 58 ± 11%. Most patients were male (52%) and had hypertension (84%) and dyslipidemia (84%), with 24% having diabetes mellitus and 20% chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The CAS was visually estimated during angiography (mean 58 ± 9%) and most often found in the left anterior descending coronary artery (48%). A strong, linear correlation of FFR was noted with adenosine and regadenoson (r = 0.985, p < 0.001). A hemodynamically significant lesion (FFR ≤ 0.80) was present in 52% with no reclassification of significance between adenosine and regadenoson. No serious events occurred with administration of either drug.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that a single IV bolus of regadenoson is as effective as an intravenous infusion of adenosine for measuring FFR and, given its ease of use, should be considered for FFR measurement in the catheterization laboratory.

Selective action of metoprolol to attenuate regadenoson-induced tachycardia in conscious dogs

BACKGROUND

Regadenoson is a coronary vasodilator that causes tachycardia via activation of the sympathetic nervous system. We determined whether β(1)-adrenergic blockade can attenuate tachycardia without significantly reducing coronary vasodilation induced by regadenoson.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Hemodynamics and coronary blood flow (CBF) were measured in conscious dogs. Baseline CBF and heart rate (HR) were 42 ± 2 mL/min and 87 ± 8 bpm (mean ± SEM), respectively. Regadenoson (1, 2.5, and 5 μg/kg) increased peak CBF by 129 ± 10, 149 ± 7, and 174 ± 10 mL/min and HR by 48 ± 6, 67 ± 5, and 85 ± 11 bpm, respectively, (all P < .05 vs baseline). In the presence of metoprolol (1.5 mg/kg), the peak increases in CBF caused by these three doses of regadenoson were reduced by only 11 ± 7%, 10 ± 4%, and 21 ± 2% (P = NS, <.05, and <.05 vs regadenoson alone), respectively, whereas the regadenoson-induced tachycardia was significantly reduced by 55 ± 8%, 55 ± 4%, and 52 ± 5% (all P < .05). In the presence of metoprolol, the duration of the regadenoson-induced increase in CBF was reduced, but the duration of the 2-fold increase in CBF caused by 5 μg/kg regadenoson was still nearly 6 minutes.

CONCLUSION

β(1)-Adrenergic blockade with metoprolol attenuated the regadenoson-induced increase in HR more than the increase in CBF.

Selective adenosine agonists and myocardial perfusion imaging

Selective adenosine receptor agonists have several advantages for use as stress agents in conjunction with myocardial perfusion imaging compared to the non selective agents such as adenosine and dipyridamole. This review will summarize the pre-clinical and clinical data on the selective adenosine agonist stress agents regadenoson (Lexiscan(®)), binodenoson (CorVue™) and apadenoson (Stedivaze™) that have been studied so far with focus on regadenoson that has the most clinical data published so far. The article will review the adenosine receptor types and properties. It will also review the various attributes of the selective adenosine agonists including their pharmacology, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, their coronary vasodilatory and hemodynamic effects, their safety and side effects, their interactions with other drugs and their use with myocardial perfusion imaging. The landmark trials of the selective adenosine agonists will be reviewed as well as their use in special patient populations undergoing stress myocardial perfusion imaging.

Contribution of adenosine A(2A) and A(2B) receptors to ischemic coronary dilation: role of K(V) and K(ATP) channels

This study was designed to elucidate the contribution of adenosine A(2A) and A(2B) receptors to coronary reactive hyperemia and downstream K(+) channels involved. Coronary blood flow was measured in open-chest anesthetized dogs. Adenosine dose-dependently increased coronary flow from 0.72 ± 0.1 to 2.6 ± 0.5 mL/minute/g under control conditions. Inhibition of A(2A) receptors with SCH58261 (1 μm) attenuated adenosine-induced dilation by ∼50%, while combined administration with the A(2B) receptor antagonist alloxazine (3 μm) produced no additional effect. SCH58261 significantly reduced reactive hyperemia in response to a transient 15 second occlusion; debt/repayment ratio decreased from 343 ± 63 to 232 ± 44%. Alloxazine alone attenuated adenosine-induced increases in coronary blood flow by ∼30% but failed to alter reactive hyperemia. A(2A) receptor agonist CGS21680 (10 μg bolus) increased coronary blood flow by 3.08 ± 0.31 mL/minute/g. This dilator response was attenuated to 0.76 ± 0.14 mL/minute/g by inhibition of K(V) channels with 4-aminopyridine (0.3mm) and to 0.11 ± 0.31 mL/minute/g by inhibition of K(ATP) channels with glibenclamide (3 mg/kg). Combined administration abolished vasodilation to CGS21680. These data indicate that A(2A) receptors contribute to coronary vasodilation in response to cardiac ischemia via activation of K(V) and K(ATP) channels.

Lessons from regadenoson and low-level treadmill/regadenoson myocardial perfusion imaging: initial clinical experience in 1263 patients

BACKGROUND

Regadenoson is a pharmacologic stress agent, which was recently approved for stress myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI). Aside from the initial protocol-driven studies, clinical experience with this stress agent is limited. Furthermore, low-level treadmill testing in a large population with regadenoson has not previously been evaluated. We describe our experience in the first 6 months of routine inpatient and outpatient clinical use.

METHODS

Between 7/1/08 and 12/04/08, 1263 patients underwent regadenoson stress testing (596 with low-level treadmill, 667 supine). Past medical history, clinical symptoms during stress, and changes in systolic blood pressure were prospectively recorded.

RESULTS

Low-level treadmill testing was well tolerated in our patient population. Shortness of breath, dizziness, palpitations, transient heart block, and nausea were less frequent when patients were able to exercise. In our population, 51% experienced a drop in systolic blood pressure greater than 10 mmHg, with 9% experiencing a decrease in more than 30 mmHg. This decrease in blood pressure was more common in patients who underwent low-level treadmill testing vs those that were supine (56% vs 47%, P-value < 0.001). The frequency of symptoms in our entire population was as follows: chest pain 35%, dizziness/lightheadedness 16%, shortness of breath 27%, headache 1.4%, nausea 2.3%, and palpitations 5%. There were no major hemodynamic or conduction abnormalities. In the 16% of patients, a history of COPD/Asthma Regadenoson MPI was well tolerated. There were no procedural deaths.

CONCLUSION

Regadenoson and Regadenoson combined with low level exercise MPI appear to be safe and well tolerated. An asymptomatic fall in systolic blood pressure seems to be more common in patients who undergo low-level treadmill testing.

Regadenoson for myocardial perfusion scintigraphy

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD

Stress myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS) plays a major role in the detection of obstructive coronary artery disease and provides valuable diagnostic and prognostic information to guide clinical decision-making with regard to medical therapy and coronary revascularisation. Current stress techniques for MPS are effective but their use may be limited by reduced tolerability, contraindications and untoward side effects. The recently developed selective adenosine A2A receptor agonists have the potential for improving stress tolerability, hence expanding the indications for functional imaging in the assessment of coronary artery disease.

AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW

This article reviews the basic principles underlying activation of coronary arteriolar adenosine A2A receptors. It describes the benefits and limitations of current vasodilator stress agents and highlights the effectiveness, side effect profile and tolerability of regadenoson, the only selective adenosine A2A receptor agonist available at present for clinical use.

WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN

The reader will gain an understanding of the pharmacokinetics and mechanism of action of regadenoson for the assessment of coronary artery disease when combined with myocardial perfusion imaging. The reader will also become aware of the available evidence on the clinical usefulness of regadenoson MPS and its future applications.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

Selective activation of coronary arteriolar adenosine A2A receptors by regadenoson provides an effective modality of stress for the detection of inducible perfusion abnormality in patients with known or suspected coronary disease. The effectiveness of regadenoson is similar to that of adenosine, but test tolerability is improved with regadenoson. The use of this agent simplifies stress testing and has the potential for expanding the applications of functional imaging to patient populations unsuitable for conventional vasodilator stress with adenosine or dipyridamole.

Effects of adenosine and a selective A2A adenosine receptor agonist on hemodynamic and thallium-201 and technetium-99m-sestaMIBI biodistribution and kinetics

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to compare a selective A(2A) adenosine receptor agonist (regadenoson) with adenosine in clinically relevant canine models with regard to effects on hemodynamics and thallium-201 ((201)Tl) and technetium-99m ((99m)Tc)-sestaMIBI biodistribution and kinetics.

BACKGROUND

The clinical application of vasodilator stress for perfusion imaging requires consideration of the effects of these vasodilating agents on systemic hemodynamics, coronary flow, and radiotracer uptake and clearance kinetics.

METHODS

Sequential imaging and arterial blood sampling was performed on control, anesthetized closed-chest canines (n = 7) to evaluate radiotracer biodistribution and kinetics after either a bolus administration of regadenoson (2.5 microg/kg) or 4.5-min infusion of adenosine (280 microg/kg). The effects of regadenoson on coronary flow and myocardial radiotracer uptake were then evaluated in an open-chest canine model of a critical stenosis (n = 7). Results from ex vivo single-photon emission computed tomography were compared with tissue well-counting.

RESULTS

The use of regadenoson compared favorably with adenosine in regard to the duration and magnitude of the hemodynamic effects and the effect on (201)Tl and (99m)Tc-sestaMIBI biodistribution and kinetics. The arterial blood clearance half-time was significantly faster for (99m)Tc-sestaMIBI (regadenoson: 1.4 +/- 0.03 min; adenosine: 1.5 +/- 0.08 min) than for (201)Tl (regadenoson: 2.5 +/- 0.16 min, p < 0.01; adenosine: 2.7 +/- 0.04 min, p < 0.01) for both vasodilator stressors. The relative microsphere flow deficit (0.34 +/- 0.02%) during regadenoson stress was significantly greater than the relative perfusion defect with (99m)Tc-sestaMIBI (0.69 +/- 0.03%, p < 0.001) or (201)Tl (0.53 +/- 0.02%, p < 0.001), although (201)Tl tracked the flow deficit within the ischemic region better than (99m)Tc-sestaMIBI. The perfusion defect score was larger with (201)Tl (22 +/- 2.8% left ventricular) than with (99m)Tc-sestaMIBI (17 +/- 1.7% left ventricular, p < 0.05) on ex vivo single-photon emission computed tomography images.

CONCLUSIONS

The bolus administration of regadenoson produced a hyperemic response comparable to a standard infusion of adenosine. The biodistribution and clearance of both (201)Tl and (99m)Tc-sestaMIBI during regadenoson were similar to adenosine vasodilation. Ex vivo perfusion images under the most ideal conditions permitted detection of a critical stenosis, although (201)Tl offered significant advantages over (99m)Tc-sestaMIBI for perfusion imaging during regadenoson vasodilator stress.

Regadenoson: a new myocardial stress agent

Vasodilator stress myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) accounts for up to 50% of all stress MPI studies performed in the U.S. In 2008, the Food and Drug Administration approved regadenoson for stress testing in conjunction with MPI. Regadenoson, unlike adenosine, is a selective A(2A) agonist that is given as an intravenous bolus at a fixed dose, with less undesirable side effects including atrioventricular block and bronchospasm. Unlike adenosine, regadenoson could be used in patients with mild-to-moderate reactive airway disease. This review will summarize the pre-clinical and clinical data on regadenoson, as they specifically relate to its use as a vasodilator stress agent, currently the only approved selective A(2A) agonist.

Regadenoson, a novel pharmacologic stress agent for use in myocardial perfusion imaging, does not have a direct effect on the QT interval in conscious dogs

Our goal was to determine the effect of regadenoson (a novel A2A adenosine receptor agonist) on the QT interval in conscious dogs. Sixteen mongrel dogs were chronically instrumented for measurements of blood pressure and ECG. Regadenoson (2.5, 5, and 10 microg/kg, IV) caused a dose-dependent QT interval shortening (DeltaQT: 14 +/- 3, 24 +/- 5, and 27 +/- 5 ms, mean +/- SEM; n = 7 to 11; all P < 0.05) associated with significant increases in HR (Peak HR: 114 +/- 9, 125 +/- 6, and 144 +/- 7 bpm). Atrial pacing (135, 150, and 165 bpm) also caused a frequency-dependent shortening of the QT interval (DeltaQT: 15 +/- 3, 22 +/- 3, and 39 +/- 5 ms; n = 6 to 7; all P < 0.05). Regadenoson- and pacing-induced shortenings in the QT interval were significantly correlated with the R-R interval (r = 0.67 and 0.8, both P < 0.05). Regadenoson at 5 and 10 microg/kg did not cause a significant change in HR or QT interval either during atrial pacing at 165 bpm or after administration of propranolol and atropine to prevent HR from changing or after treatment of dogs with hexamethonium to block autonomic ganglia. Regadenoson (5 to 10 microg/kg) caused no significant changes of QT interval in the heart in which HR was kept constant via physiological or pharmacological procedures, indicating that regadenoson has no direct effect on the QT interval.

Advances in pharmacologic agents in imaging: new A2A receptor agonists

Pharmacologic stress myocardial perfusion imaging is being performed with increasing frequency over exercise stress. Dipyridamole and adenosine have a high side-effect profile, provide higher than needed coronary artery flow rates, and use a relatively complicated method of administration. Based on preclinical animal work, three selective adenosine A2A receptor agonists, regadenoson (CVT3146), binodenoson (MRE0470 or WRC0470), and apadenoson (BMS068645 or ATL146e), may overcome these limitations and are now in Phase III studies as pharmacologic stress agents. For single-photon emission CT imaging, binodenoson and regadenoson were concordant with adenosine images for detection and quantitation of ischemia. Despite the high A2A selectivity of binodenoson and regadenoson in preclinical studies, subjective side effects attributable to other adenosine receptor subtypes were still observed in human studies and are similar to or slightly lower than adenosine. There have been no reports of atrioventricular block or bronchospasm with either regadenoson or binodenoson in published trials.

Caffeine Attenuates the Duration of Coronary Vasodilation and Changes in Hemodynamics Induced by Regadenoson (CVT-3146), a Novel Adenosine A2A Receptor Agonist

Effects of caffeine on regadenoson-induced coronary vasodilation and changes in hemodynamics were examined in conscious dogs. Sixteen dogs were chronically instrumented for measurements of coronary blood flow (CBF), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and heart rate (HR). Regadenoson (5 microg/kg, IV) increased CBF from 34 +/- 2 to 191 +/- 7 mL/min. The duration of the 2-fold increase in CBF was 515 +/- 71 seconds. Regadenoson decreased MAP by 15 +/- 2% and increased HR by 114 +/- 14%. Regadenoson-induced maximum increases in CBF were not significantly lower in the presence of caffeine at 1, 2, 4, and 10 mg/kg (2 +/- 3, 0.7 +/- 3, 16 +/- 5, and 13 +/- 8%, respectively; all P > 0.05). Caffeine at 1, 2, 4, and 10 mg/kg significantly decreased the duration of the 2-fold increase in CBF induced by regadenoson by 17% +/- 4%, 48% +/- 8%, 62% +/- 5%, and 82% +/- 5%, respectively (all P < 0.05). Caffeine at 4 and 10 mg/kg significantly attenuated the effects of regadenoson on MAP and HR. The results indicate that 1 to 10 mg/kg caffeine dose-dependently reduced the duration, but not the peak increase of CBF caused by 5 microg/kg regadenoson.

A Population Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Analysis of Regadenoson, an Adenosine A2A-Receptor Agonist, in Healthy Male Volunteers

OBJECTIVES

The aims of this study were to investigate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of regadenoson (CVT-3146) in healthy, male volunteers.

METHODS

Thirty-six healthy, male volunteers aged 18-50 years were included in this randomised, double-blind, crossover, placebo-controlled study to evaluate single intravenous bolus doses of regadenoson that ranged from 0.1 to 30.0 micro g/kg. Subjects received one dose of regadenoson or placebo on successive days while supine, then the same dose of regadenoson or placebo on successive days while standing. As part of the safety evaluation, vital signs and adverse events were monitored and recorded throughout the course of the study in all subjects. Up to 20 plasma samples were collected for regadenoson concentration determination within the 24 hours after each supine dosage. All urine was collected during the 24-hour time period post-dose and an aliquot was used for the determination of the regadenoson concentration. Heart rate and blood pressure were recorded at many of the same timepoints that the samples for the pharmacokinetic analysis were taken. A non linear mixed-effect modelling approach, using the software NONMEM, was utilised in modelling the plasma and urine concentration-time profiles and temporal changes in heart rate after regadenoson administration in the supine position. The influences of several covariates, including bodyweight, body mass index and age, on pharmacokinetic model parameters were investigated.

RESULTS

Adverse events were more prevalent at regadenoson doses above 3 micro g/kg, and the increase in the occurrence of adverse events was dose-related. Most of the adverse events were related to vasodilation and an increase in heart rate and were generally of mild to moderate severity. Based on the severity and frequency of adverse events, the maximum tolerated doses of regadenoson were deemed to be 10 micro g/kg in the standing position and 20 micro g/kg in the supine position. The pharmacokinetics of regadenoson were successfully described by a three-compartment model with linear clearance. Following intravenous bolus dose administration, regadenoson was rapidly distributed throughout the body, followed by relatively slower elimination (terminal elimination half-life of approximately 2 hours). The clearance was estimated to be 37.8 L/h, with renal excretion accounting for approximately 58% of the total elimination. The volume of distribution of the central compartment and the volume of distribution at steady state were estimated to be 11.5L and 78.7L, respectively. Individual pharmacokinetic parameter estimates were fixed in the pharmacodynamic model, where changes in heart rate were related to plasma drug concentrations using a Michaelis-Menten model. The maximum heart rate increase (Emax) and plasma regadenoson concentration causing a 50% increase in the maximum heart rate (EC50) were estimated to be 76 beats per minute and 12.3 ng/mL, respectively. None of the tested covariates was found to be correlated with any of the pharmacokinetic model parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

The pharmacokinetics and the effects of regadenoson on heart rate were successfully described using pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modelling. The lack of a correlation between the model estimates and various baseline patient demographics supports unit-based dose administration of regadenoson.

Initial clinical experience with regadenoson, a novel selective A2A agonist for pharmacologic stress single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging

OBJECTIVES

Regadenoson, a selective A2A adenosine receptor agonist, was evaluated for tolerability and effectiveness as a pharmacological stress agent for detecting reversible myocardial hypoperfusion when combined with single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT).

BACKGROUND

Adenosine and dipyridamole are nonselective adenosine agonists currently used as pharmacologic stressors. Despite proven safety, these agents often cause undesirable side effects and require a continuous infusion.

METHODS

This Phase II, multicenter, open-label trial was conducted in 36 patients who had demonstrated ischemia on a 6-min adenosine SPECT imaging study within the previous 2 to 46 days. Patients received regadenoson as a rapid intravenous bolus dose of 400 microg (n = 18) or 500 microg (n = 18). The radiopharmaceutical was then delivered within one minute. The SPECT images were acquired in a standard manner and uniformly processed at a central laboratory. Regadenoson and adenosine studies were presented in random order and interpreted blindly with a 17-segment model by three observers. Additionally, quantitative analysis was performed with 4D-MSPECT software (University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan).

RESULTS

Overall agreement for the presence of reversible hypoperfusion was 86%. The 400-mug dose was better tolerated. Overall, regadenoson was well-tolerated; side effects (e.g., chest discomfort, flushing, dyspnea) were generally mild in severity and self-limiting. High-grade atrioventricular block and bronchospasm were not observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Regadenoson is well-tolerated and seems as effective as adenosine for detecting and quantifying the extent of hypoperfusion observed with SPECT perfusion imaging. Phase III clinical trials are now underway, given the promise of regadenoson's reduced side effects and simplicity of bolus administration.

Tachycardia caused by A2A adenosine receptor agonists is mediated by direct sympathoexcitation in awake rats

Adenosine-induced tachycardia is suggested to be mediated via A(2A) receptors; however, the exact mechanism for this effect remains to be understood. The present study was carried out using regadenoson, a selective A(2A) adenosine receptor agonist, to determine the role of the A(2A) receptor subtype in adenosine-induced tachycardia. Regadenoson (0.3-50 microg/kg) given as a rapid i.v. bolus to awake rats caused a dose-dependent increase in heart rate (HR). Mean arterial pressure (MAP) increased at lower doses, whereas at higher doses, there was a decrease in MAP. The increase in HR was evident at the lowest dose (0.3 microg/kg) of regadenoson at which there was no appreciable decrease in MAP. Pretreatment with 30 microg/kg ZM 241385 [4-(2-[7-amino-2-(2-furyl)-[1,2,4]-triazolo-[2,3-a]-[1,3,5]-triazin-5-ylamino]ethyl)phenol], an A(2A) receptor antagonist, attenuated the decrease in MAP and the increase in HR caused by regadenoson. Pretreatment with metoprolol (1 mg/kg), a beta-blocker, attenuated the increase in HR but had no effect on the hypotension caused by regadenoson. In the presence of hexamethonium (10 mg/kg), a ganglionic blocker, the tachycardia was completely prevented even though MAP was further reduced. Regadenoson treatment (10 microg/kg) significantly (p < 0.05) increased plasma norepinephrine levels almost 2-fold above baseline. The dissociation of HR and MAP effects by dose, time, and pharmacological interventions provides evidence that tachycardia caused by regadenoson is independent of the decrease in MAP and may not entirely be baroreflex-mediated, suggesting that regadenoson may cause a direct stimulation of the sympathetic nervous system via activation of A(2A) adenosine receptors.

The future of pharmacologic stress: selective A2A adenosine receptor agonists

Adenosine and dipyridamole, the currently available vasodilators for myocardial perfusion imaging, produce hyperemic coronary flow by stimulating A(2A) adenosine receptors on arteriolar vascular smooth muscle cells. However, both vasodilators nonselectively activate A(1), A(2B), and A(3) adenosine receptors, which contributes to common undesirable effects. In the development of a novel pharmacologic stress agent, more selective agonism of the A(2A) receptor subtype would be desirable. Currently, 2 selective A(2A) adenosine receptor agonists are being evaluated in phase 3 studies as pharmacologic stress agents. The highly selective, potent, low-affinity A(2A) adenosine agonist regadenoson (also known as CVT-3146) holds significant potential as a pharmacologic stress agent, based on available results from experimental and clinical trials. Regadenoson produces maximal hyperemia quickly and maintains it for an optimal duration that is practical for radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging. Regadenoson's simple rapid bolus administration and short duration of hyperemic effect point to an advantage of enhanced control for the clinician.

Comparative profile of vasodilation by CVT-3146, a novel A2A receptor agonist, and adenosine in conscious dogs

The purpose of this study was to determine the magnitude of vasodilation by CVT-3146 in different vascular beds and to compare it with that by adenosine in conscious dogs. Intravenous bolus injections of CVT-3146 (0.1-2.5 microg/kg) or adenosine (10-250 microg/kg) caused a dose-dependent increase in the coronary blood flow (CBF) and a dose-dependent decrease in the late diastolic coronary resistance. Although the maximal increase in CBF response to the two drugs was not significantly different, the ED50 of CVT-3146 and adenosine were 0.45 +/- 0.07 microg/kg and 47 +/- 7.77 microg/kg, respectively. The highest dose of CVT-3146 caused a much longer coronary vasodilation than the highest dose of adenosine. There were no significant differences in increases in cardiac output induced by higher doses of CVT-3146 or adenosine. Most importantly, CVT-3146 resulted in a smaller decrease in total peripheral resistance (TPR) compared to that seen with adenosine. In addition, CVT-3146 yielded a smaller increase in the lower body flow (LBF) than adenosine. Adenosine also caused dose-dependent renal vasoconstriction, whereas CVT-3146 did not affect the renal blood flow. The administration of CVT-3146 or adenosine caused a dose-dependent vasodilation in the mesentery, which was not significantly different from each other. In summary, CVT-3146 is a 100-fold more potent coronary vasodilator than adenosine. CVT-3146 causes smaller decreases in TPR and smaller increases in LBF than those induced by adenosine, indicating that it is more selective for coronary than peripheral vasodilation. Furthermore, CVT-3146 did not cause renal vasoconstriction. These features make CVT-3146 a better candidate for pharmacologic stress testing.