Comparative use of magnetic resonance imaging and electrophysiologic investigation for the prognosis of head injury

Multimodal approaches supporting the diagnosis, prognosis and investigation of neural correlates of disorders of consciousness: A systematic review

The limits of the standard, behaviour-based clinical assessment of patients with disorders of consciousness (DoC) prompted the employment of functional neuroimaging, neurometabolic, neurophysiological and neurostimulation techniques, to detect brain-based covert markers of awareness. However, uni-modal approaches, consisting in employing just one of those techniques, are usually not sufficient to provide an exhaustive exploration of the neural underpinnings of residual awareness. This systematic review aimed at collecting the evidence from studies employing a multimodal approach, that is, combining more instruments to complement DoC diagnosis, prognosis and better investigating their neural correlates. Following the PRISMA guidelines, records from PubMed, EMBASE and Scopus were screened to select peer-review original articles in which a multi-modal approach was used for the assessment of adult patients with a diagnosis of DoC. Ninety-two observational studies and 32 case reports or case series met the inclusion criteria. Results highlighted a diagnostic and prognostic advantage of multi-modal approaches that involve electroencephalography-based (EEG-based) measurements together with neuroimaging or neurometabolic data or with neurostimulation. Multimodal assessment deepened the knowledge on the neural networks underlying consciousness, by showing correlations between the integrity of the default mode network and the different clinical diagnosis of DoC. However, except for studies using transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with electroencephalography, the integration of more than one technique in most of the cases occurs without an a priori-designed multi-modal diagnostic approach. Our review supports the feasibility and underlines the advantages of a multimodal approach for the diagnosis, prognosis and for the investigation of neural correlates of DoCs.

The Prognostic Value of MRI in Moderate and Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVES

Traumatic brain injury is a major cause of death and disability, yet many predictors of outcome are not precise enough to guide initial clinical decision-making. Although increasingly used in the early phase following traumatic brain injury, the prognostic utility of MRI remains uncertain. We thus undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies evaluating the predictive value of acute MRI lesion patterns for discriminating clinical outcome in traumatic brain injury.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, EMBASE, BIOSIS, and CENTRAL from inception to November 2015.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies of adults who had MRI in the acute phase following moderate or severe traumatic brain injury. Our primary outcomes were all-cause mortality and the Glasgow Outcome Scale.

DATA EXTRACTION

Two authors independently performed study selection and data extraction. We calculated pooled effect estimates with a random effects model, evaluated the risk of bias using a modified version of Quality in Prognostic Studies and determined the strength of evidence with the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation.

DATA SYNTHESIS

We included 58 eligible studies, of which 27 (n = 1,652) contributed data to meta-analysis. Brainstem lesions were associated with all-cause mortality (risk ratio, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.01-3.15; I = 43%) and unfavorable Glasgow Outcome Scale (risk ratio, 2.49; 95% CI, 1.72-3.58; I = 81%) at greater than or equal to 6 months. Diffuse axonal injury patterns were associated with an increased risk of unfavorable Glasgow Outcome Scale (risk ratio, 2.46; 95% CI, 1.06-5.69; I = 74%). MRI scores based on lesion depth demonstrated increasing risk of unfavorable neurologic outcome as more caudal structures were affected. Most studies were at high risk of methodological bias.

CONCLUSIONS

MRI following traumatic brain injury yields important prognostic information, with several lesion patterns significantly associated with long-term survival and neurologic outcome. Given the high risk of bias in the current body of literature, large well-controlled studies are necessary to better quantify the prognostic role of early MRI in moderate and severe traumatic brain injury.

Prognostic Value of Evoked Responses and Event-Related Brain Potentials in

The behaviourally unresponsive patient, unable to exhibit the presence of cognition, constitutes a conundrum for health care specialists. Prognostic uncertainty impedes accurate management decisions and the application of ethical principles. An early, reliable prognosis is highly desirable. In this review investigations studying comatose patients with coma of different etiologies were selected. It is concluded that objective prognostication is enhanced by the use of electrophysiological tests. Persistent abnormalities of brainstem auditory evoked potentials and short-latency somatosensory evoked potentials reliably indicate the likelihood of irreversible neurological deficit or death. Meanwhile, the presence of “cognitive” event-related brain potentials (e.g., P300 and mismatch negativity) reflects the functional integrity of higher level information processing and, therefore, the likelihood of capacity for cognition. An approach that combines clinical and electrophysiological values provides optimal prediction of outcome and level of disability.

Neuroimaging after coma

Following coma, some patients will recover wakefulness without signs of consciousness (only showing reflex movements, i.e., the vegetative state) or may show non-reflex movements but remain without functional communication (i.e., the minimally conscious state). Currently, there remains a high rate of misdiagnosis of the vegetative state (Schnakers et. al. BMC Neurol, 9:35, 8) and the clinical and electrophysiological markers of outcome from the vegetative and minimally conscious states remain unsatisfactory. This should incite clinicians to use multimodal assessment to detect objective signs of consciousness and validate para-clinical prognostic markers in these challenging patients. This review will focus on advanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques such as magnetic resonance spectroscopy, diffusion tensor imaging, and functional MRI (fMRI studies in both "activation" and "resting state" conditions) that were recently introduced in the assessment of patients with chronic disorders of consciousness.

Outcome prediction in traumatic brain injury: comparison of neurological status, CT findings, and blood levels of S100B and GFAP

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the predictive value of early serum levels of S100B and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) in traumatic brain injury.

METHODS

Sixty patients admitted within 24 h of trauma were included. Neurological status on admission (Glasgow Coma Scale), initial cranial computed tomography (CCT) studies (Marshall Computed Tomographic Classification), and outcome after 6 months (Glasgow Outcome Scale) were evaluated. S100B and GFAP levels were determined on admission and 24 h after trauma.

RESULTS

Blood levels of S100B and GFAP were elevated following head trauma and quantitatively reflected the severity of trauma. S100B levels after 24 h and on admission were of higher predictive value than CCT findings or clinical examination. GFAP, but not S100B levels rapidly declined after trauma.

CONCLUSIONS

Blood levels of S100B and GFAP indicate the severity of brain damage and are correlated with neurological prognosis after trauma. Both methods can yield additional prognostic information if combined with clinical and CCT findings.

Exploring altered consciousness states by magnetic resonance imaging in brain injury

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) occurs abruptly, involves multiple specialized teams, calls on the health-care system in its emergency dimension, and engages the well-being of the patient and his relatives for a lifetime period. Clinicians in charge of these patients are faced with issues of uppermost importance: medical issues such as predicting the long-term neurological outcome of the comatose patient; ethical issues because of the influence of intensive care on the long-term survival of patients in a vegetative and minimally conscious state; legal issues because of the law that has set the concept of proportionality of care as the legal rule; and social issues as the result of the very high cost of these pathologies. Today's larger availability of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in ventilated patients and the recent improvements in hardware and in imaging techniques that have made the last-developed imaging techniques such as diffusion tensor imaging and magnetic resonance spectroscopy available in brain-trauma patients, are changing the paradigm in neurointensive care regarding outcome prediction. The old paradigm that no individual prognosis could be made at the subacute phase in TBI patients does not hold true anymore. This major change opens new challenging ethical questions. This review focuses on the brain explorations that are required, such as MRI, magnetic resonance spectroscopy, and diffusion tensor imaging, to provide the clinician with a multimodal assessment of the brain state to predict outcome of coma. Such an assessment will become mandatory in the near future to answer the crucial question of proportionality of care in these patients.

Magnetic resonance spectroscopy and diffusion tensor imaging in coma survivors: promises and pitfalls

The status of comatose patient is currently established on the basis of the patient-exhibited behaviors. Clinical assessment is subjective and, in 40% of patients, fails to distinguish vegetative state (VS) from minimally conscious states (MCS). The technologic advances of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have dramatically improved our understanding of these altered states of consciousness. The role of neuroimaging in coma survivors has increased beyond the simple evaluation of morphological abnormalities. The development of 1H-MR spectroscopy (MRS) and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) provide opportunity to evaluate processes that cannot be approached by current morphologic MRI sequences. They offer potentially unique insights into the histopathology of VS and MCS. The MRS is a powerful noninvasive imaging technique that enables the in vivo quantification of certain chemical compound or metabolites as N-acetylaspartate (NAA), Choline (Cho), and Creatine (Cr). These biomarkers explore neuronal integrity (NAA), cell membrane turnover (Cho), and cell energetic function (Cr). DTI is an effective and proved quantitative method for evaluating tissue integrity at microscopic level. It provides information about the microstructure and the architecture of tissues, especially the white matter. Various physical parameters can be extracted from this sequence: the fractional anisotropy (FA), a marker of white matter integrity; mean diffusivity (MD); and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) which can differentiate cytotoxic and vasogenic edema. The most prominent findings with MRS and DTI performed in traumatic brain-injured (TBI) patients in subacute phase are the reduction of the NAA/Cr ratio in posterior pons and the decrease of mean infratentorial and supratentorial FA except in posterior pons that enables to predict unfavorable outcome at 1 year from TBI with up to 86% sensitivity and 97% specificity. This review will focus on the interest of comatose patients MRI multimodal assessment with MRS and DTI. It will emphasize the advantages and pitfalls of these techniques in particular in predicting the coma survivors' outcome.

Traumatisés crâniens graves: jusqu'où aller?

Traumatic brain injury occurs abruptly, involves multiple specialized teams, solicits the health care system in its emergency dimension and engages the well being of the patient and his relatives for a life time period. Clinicians are faced with issues of uppermost importance: medical issues such as predicting long term neurological outcome of the comatose patient, ethical issues because of the influence of intensive care on the long term survival of patients in vegetative and minimally conscious state, legal issues as the consequence of the current law which has set a new concept of proportionality of care, social issues as the result of the very high cost of these pathologies. This review will focus on the brain explorations that are required such as CT scan, evoked potentials, electroencephalography, magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance spectroscopy to provide to the clinician a multimodal assessment of the brain state to predict outcome of coma. Such assessment is mandatory to answer the crucial question of proportionality of care in these patients. However, these techniques need further validation on large series of patients before being useful on clinical practice.

Early morphologic and spectroscopic magnetic resonance in severe traumatic brain injuries can detect "invisible brain stem damage" and predict "vegetative states"

A precise evaluation of the brain damage in the first days of severe traumatic brain injured (TBI) patients is still uncertain despite numerous available cerebral evaluation methods and imaging. In 5-10% of severe TBI patients, clinicians remain concerned with prolonged coma and long-term marked cognitive impairment unexplained by normal morphological T2 star, flair, and diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). For this reason, we prospectively assessed the potential value of magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) of the brain stem to evaluate the functionality of the consciousness areas. Forty consecutive patients with severe TBI were included. Single voxel proton MRS of the brain stem and morphological MRI of the whole brain were performed at day 17.5 +/- 6.4. Disability Rating Scale and Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) were evaluated at 18 months posttrauma. MRS appeared to be a reliable tool in the exploration of brainstem metabolism in TBI. Three different spectra were observed (normal, cholinergic reaction, or neuronal damage) allowing an evaluation of functional damage. MRS disturbances were not correlated with anatomical MRI lesions suggesting that the two techniques are strongly complementarity. In two GOS 2 vegetative patients with normal morphological MRI, MRS detected severe functional damage of the brainstem (NAA/Cr < 1.50) that was described as "invisible brain stem damage." MRI and MRS taken separately could not distinguish patients GOS 3 (n = 7) from GOS 1-2 (n = 11) and GOS 4-5 (n = 20). However, a principal component analysis of combined MRI and MRS data enabled a clear-cut separation between GOS 1-2, GOS 3, and GOS 4-5 patients with no overlap between groups. This study showed that combined MRI and MRS provide a reliable evaluation of patients presenting in deep coma, specially when there are insufficient MRI lesions of the consciousness pathways to explain their status. In the first few days post-trauma metabolic (brainstem spectroscopy) and morphological (T2 star and Flair) MRI studies can predict the long-term neurological outcome, especially the persistent vegetative states and minimally conscious state.

[Brain MRI in the assessment of severe head trauma]

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in patients with severe head injury allows comprehensive assessment of the primary insult thus providing an indicator of possible long term prognosis. Morphological images can now be coupled to metabolic analysis, thus providing a more precise assessment of brain lesions and opening a new exciting field of research. Before embarking on such an exercise, the clinician must be familiar with the advantages and pitfalls of each MRI sequence, and must appreciate the risks associated with the transportation of the sedated and ventilated patient from ICU to the MRI suite. For practical reasons and because of the high risk of uncontrolled surges in intracranial pressure during the exam, MRI is usually performed during the third week following injury, at the time when brain edema is subsiding.

[Prognostic factors in severe head injury]

The knowledge of the so called prognostic factors or indicators involved in severe head injury (SHI) is an issue of great interest to make predictions about the future of patients with this pathology. Those indicators constitute the basic elements of the different prognostic formulas or models carried out in order to make predictions in SHI. The mentioned models, therefore, will be constructed by a group of variables (prognostic indicators or factors) and several scales (prognostic scales) that are useful for measuring the final outcome of these patients. In this paper we resume, after an exhaustive review of the literature, the knowledge about the prognostic factors related to SHI. These indicators have been classified as follows: clinical, radiological, physiological, and biochemical. Moreover, we have briefly described the prognostic scales more commonly used in SHI.

The prognostic value of evoked responses from primary somatosensory and auditory cortex in comatose patients

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate somatosensory and auditory primary cortices using somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) and middle latency auditory evoked potentials (MLAEPs) in the prognosis of return to consciousness in comatose patients.

METHODS

SEPs and MLAEPs were recorded in 131 severe comatose patients. Latencies and amplitudes were measured. Coma had been caused by transient cardiac arrest (n=49), traumatic brain injury (n=22), stroke (n=45), complications of neurosurgery (n=12) and encephalitis (n=3). One month after the onset of coma patients were classified as awake, still comatose or dead. Three months after (M3), they were classified into one of the 5 categories of the Glasgow outcome scale (GOS).

RESULTS

At M3, 41.2% were dead, 47.3% were conscious (GOS 3-5) and 11.5% had not recovered consciousness. None of the patients in whom somatosensory N20 and auditory Pa were absent did return to consciousness and in the post-anoxic group, reduced cortical amplitude too was always associated with bad outcome. Conversely, N20 and Pa were present, respectively, in 33/69 and 34/69 patients who did not recover.

CONCLUSIONS

The prognostic value of SEPs and MLAEPs in comatose patients depends on the cause of coma. Measurement of response amplitudes is informative. Abolition of cortical SEPs and/or cortical MLAEPs precludes post-anoxic comatose patients from returning to consciousness (100% specificity). In any case, the presence of short latency cortical somatosensory or auditory components is not a guarantee for return to consciousness. Late components should then be recorded.

Predictive value of somatosensory evoked potentials for awakening from coma

OBJECTIVES

A systematic review of somatosensory evoked potentials performed early after onset of coma, to predict the likelihood of nonawakening. The pooled results were evaluated for rates of awakening, confidence intervals, and the possibility of rare exceptions.

DATA SOURCES

Forty-one articles reporting somatosensory evoked potentials in comatose patients and subsequent outcomes, from 1983 to 2000.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies were included if they reported coma etiology, age group, presence or absence of somatosensory evoked potentials, and coma outcomes.

DATA EXTRACTION

We separated patients into four groups: adults with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, adults with intracranial hemorrhage, adults and adolescents with traumatic brain injury, and children and adolescents with any etiologies. Somatosensory evoked potentials were categorized as normal, abnormal, or bilaterally absent. Outcomes were categorized as persistent vegetative state or death vs. awakening.

DATA SYNTHESIS

For each somatosensory evoked potential result, rates of awakening (95% confidence interval) were calculated: adult hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy: absent 0% (0%-1%), abnormal 22% (17%-26%), normal 52% (48%-56%); adult intracranial hemorrhage: absent 1% (0%-4%), present 38% (27%-48%); adult-teen traumatic brain injury: absent 5% (2%-7%), abnormal 70% (64%-75%), normal 89% (85%-92%); child-teen: absent 7% (4%-10%), abnormal 69% (61%-77%), normal 86% (80%-92%).

CONCLUSIONS

Somatosensory evoked potential results predict the likelihood of nonawakening from coma with a high level of certainty. Adults in coma from hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy with absent somatosensory evoked potential responses have <1% chance of awakening.

[Assessing and predicting recovery from a coma following traumatic brain injury: contribution of neuroradiological data]

OBJECTIVE

Literature review concerning the contribution of neurological imaging to the assessment of traumatic lesions and the prognosis of traumatic coma.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Interrogation of scientific databases Medline, Embase and Current Contents via key-words. One hundred and seventy-one articles were picked up out of which 67 were analysed according to the French ANAES' rules. Results and discussion are drawn from the literature data and the author's experience.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

In the acute stage the diagnosis approach prevails the prognostic dimension, is confused by secondary complications. Computerized-Tomography (CT) remains the best imaging modality, allowing a quick diagnosis of most of injuries, especially those which require an emergency treatment. But its predictive value in coma outcome is low. Although magnetic resonance imagery (MRI) is more sensitive, it does not at the acute stage lead to therapeutic modifications, increases the costs and is thus not necessary. MRI angiography may show cranial vessel injury which need specific therapeutic procedures. In the subacute or chronic stage after a severe head injury, CT is useful for the follow up and may provide some prognostic informations. But MRI with classical sequences has a higher sensitive and predictive power. Diffusion weighted imaging has not so far made the proof of it's predictive value. Proton MR spectroscopy seems to be able to provide data correlated with neurological outcome (NAA/Cr), but is not of routine use. Single-photon emission tomography is also useful to assess brain injury sequelae in the chronic stage; positron-emission tomography still remains a research technology. These 2 modalities have not yet a prognostic value.

CONCLUSION

In the acute stage CT remains the best imaging modality. In the subacute and chronic stage MRI has the highest predictive power. Special sequences raise new hopes. Single-photon emission tomography and positron-emission tomography have not yet a prognostic value.

Comparison of MRI and electrophysiological studies for detecting brainstem lesions in traumatic brain injury

The yield of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and electrophysiological studies in detecting brainstem lesions was assessed in 35 patients suffering from traumatic brain injury (Glasgow Coma Scale, 3-10). As an inclusion criterion, all patients had brainstem trauma as revealed by early MRI or electrophysiological studies. Of the 35 cases, 7 (20%) had brainstem lesions detected by MRI only, whereas in 10 patients (29%), electrophysiological examination disclosed impairment of brainstem function with normal MRI. In 18 (51%) subjects, both diagnostic techniques revealed brainstem lesions. The midbrain was the most common location of lesions. Masseter reflex recording had the highest yield (93%) of abnormal findings. No mismatch with respect to site and side of abnormality occurred between MRI and electrophysiological studies. Outcome analysis indicated an unfavorable course for the vast majority (83%) of patients, regardless of the diagnostic means disclosing traumatic brainstem injury. Therefore, both techniques are effective in disclosing traumatic brainstem injury, with diagnostic overlap in about 50% of cases. In contrast to MRI, electrophysiological investigation is easily performed and repeated at low cost in the setting of an intensive care unit, where such patients are typically hospitalized after trauma. In addition to electrophysiological assessment of brainstem function, MRI is recommended in each case having normal electrophysiological findings when brainstem injury is suspected.

Imaging of sequelae of head trauma

The imaging of head trauma has been one of the fundamental cornerstones of neuroradiology. As the practice of neuroimaging has matured, great strides have been made in the diagnostic as well as prognostic armamentarium available to physicians. Given the vast diversity of trauma mechanisms and clinical pathways, new advanced imaging technologies have had a lasting impact on the detection, description, and depiction of head trauma. Furthermore, these new tools are allowing the imaging specialist to function not only as an interpreter of what is seen but as a 21st century radiographic oracle. We present a comprehensive review of the imaging findings of sequlae of traumatic brain injury and the growing correlation of new neuroimaging techniques and neurotraumatic outcomes.

Does wave VI of BAEP pertain to the prognosis of coma?

OBJECTIVES

The significance of brainstem auditory evoked potential (BAEP) wave VI for the outcome of comatose patients was assessed and compared to the prognostic impact of median nerve evoked somatosensory potential (MSEP) recording.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred sixteen patients in a comatose state due to traumatic brain injury (n = 57) and to intracerebral hemorrhage or tumours (n = 59) were investigated prospectively. Outcome was assessed 3 months after the onset of coma using Glasgow Outcome Score (GOS). Standard BAEP and MSEP recordings were obtained within 24 h after coma onset. The frequency of findings was correlated with outcome by means of non-parametric statistical analysis. Additionally, 27 healthy volunteers were studied to confirm the constant presence of wave VI in normal BAEP.

RESULTS

In healthy controls, wave VI was present in 53/54 ears stimulated. Outcome correlation analysis revealed a significantly (p < 0.01) higher frequency of abnormal wave VI in patients with unfavourable outcome (GOS 1-3) irrespective of the underlying pathology. Similarly, abnormal MSEP findings were significantly more frequent in this outcome group. Diagnostic sensitivity for an unfavourable outcome was low for both parameters, whereas specificity and positive predictive value of abnormal wave VI as well as of abnormal MSEP were equally high.

CONCLUSION

Abnormal BAEP wave VI bears prognostic information in comatose patients.

New frontiers in diagnostic imaging in concussive head injury

Concussed athletes may have documented incapacitating postconcussive symptoms, neuropsychological deficits, and consequent important changes in their lives and sport, yet the majority of neuroimaging attempts reveal few findings to account for these signs and symptoms. In this paper, we explore new techniques in the neuroimaging of concussion including diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and functional brain imaging technology.