Role of nitric oxide in cutaneous blood flow increases in the rat hindpaw during dorsal column stimulation

Cervical Spinal Cord Stimulation for Failed Neck Surgery Syndrome

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Cervical spine pain with or without radicular symptoms is a common condition leading to high utilization of the healthcare system with over 10 million medical visits per year. Many patients undergo surgical interventions and unfortunately are still left with neck and upper extremity pain, sometimes referred to as "Failed Neck Surgery Syndrome." When these options fail, cervical spinal cord stimulation can be a useful tool to decrease pain and suffering as well as reduce prescription medication use.

RECENT FINDINGS

Spinal cord stimulation is a well-established therapy for chronic back and leg pain and is becoming more popular for neck and upper extremity pain. Recent studies have explored cervical spinal cord stimulation with successful outcomes regarding improved pain scores, functional outcomes, and reduction of prescription medication use. Continued research into cervical spinal cord stimulation is essential for maximizing its therapeutic potential for patients with chronic neck and upper extremity pain. This review highlights the importance of cervical spinal cord stimulation as an option for patients with failed neck surgery syndrome.

Spinal cord stimulation ameliorates detrusor over-activity and visceromotor pain responses in rats with cystitis

AIM

Interstitial cystitis/painful bladder syndrome/(IC/PBS) results in recurring pain in the bladder and surrounding pelvic region caused by abnormal excitability of micturition reflexes. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is currently clinically used for the attenuation of neuropathic and visceral pain. The present study examined whether SCS at upper lumbar segments modulates detrusor overactivity and visceral hyperalgesia associated with cystitis in a rat model of cyclophosphamide (CYP)-induced cystitis.

METHODS

Cystitis was induced by intraperitoneal injection of CYP (200 mg/kg) in six adult female Sprague Dawley rats 48 h prior to urodynamic recordings. Another six rats served as-controls with saline injection. Cystometry and the external urethral sphincter (EUS) electromyography during bladder infusion were evaluated under urethane anesthesia. The visceromotor reflexes (VMR) obtained from the external abdominal oblique muscle were quantified during bladder infusion and isotonic bladder distension (IBD), respectively. After baseline recordings were taken, SCS was applied on the dorsal surface of L3 for 25 min. Urodynamic recordings and VMR during bladder infusion and IBD were repeated 2 h after SCS.

RESULTS

CYP resulted in detrusor overactivity, stronger EUS tonic contractions, and increased VMR. SCS significantly reduced non-voiding contractions, prolonged EUS relaxation, and delayed VMR appearance during bladder infusion as well as significantly decreased VMR during IBD in cystitis rats.

CONCLUSION

SCS improved bladder function and EUS relaxation during bladder infusion and significantly attenuated visceral nociceptive-related VMR during IBD in cystitis rats. SCS may have therapeutic potential for patients with hyperalgesia and IC/PBS.

Treatment of digit ulcers in a patient with Buerger's disease by using cervical spinal cord stimulation -a case report-

Buerger's disease (thromboangiitis obliterans) is known as a segmental inflammatory vasculitis that involves the small-sized and medium-sized arteries, veins, and nerves. Most effective treatment for Buerger's disease is smoking cessation. Except for the cessation of tobacco use, surgical revascularization is available in severe ischemia and a distal target vessel. Amputation has been used as the last treatment option of the disease up to the present. Increasing limb survival and decreasing amputation rate is important. This case describes the use of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) in patient with Buerger's disease and its effect is not only the complete healing of ulcers but also amputation is not performed.

Putative mechanisms behind effects of spinal cord stimulation on vascular diseases: a review of experimental studies

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a widely used clinical technique to treat ischemic pain in peripheral, cardiac and cerebral vascular diseases. The use of this treatment advanced rapidly during the late 80's and 90's, particularly in Europe. Although the clinical benefits of SCS are clear and the success rate remains high, the mechanisms are not yet completely understood. SCS at lumbar spinal segments (L2-L3) produces vasodilation in the lower limbs and feet which is mediated by antidromic activation of sensory fibers and decreased sympathetic outflow. SCS at thoracic spinal segments (T1-T2) induces several benefits including pain relief, reduction in both frequency and severity of angina attacks, and reduced short-acting nitrate intake. The benefits to the heart are not likely due to an increase, or redistribution of local blood flow, rather, they are associated with SCS-induced myocardial protection and normalization of the intrinsic cardiac nervous system. At somewhat lower cervical levels (C3-C6), SCS induces increased blood flow in the upper extremities. SCS at the upper cervical spinal segments (C1-C2) increased cerebral blood flow, which is associated with a decrease in sympathetic activity, an increase in vasomotor center activity and a release of neurohumoral factors. This review will summarize the basic science studies that have contributed to our understanding about mechanisms through which SCS produces beneficial effects when used in the treatment of vascular diseases. Furthermore, this review will particularly focus on the antidromic mechanisms of SCS-induced vasodilation in the lower limbs and feet.

Extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) and protein kinase B (AKT) pathways involved in spinal cord stimulation (SCS)-induced vasodilation

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

SCS is used to improve peripheral circulation in selected patients with ischemia of the extremities. However the mechanisms are not fully understood. The present study investigated whether blockade of ERK and AKT activation modulated SCS-induced vasodilation.

METHODS

A unipolar ball electrode was placed on the left dorsal column at the lumbar 2-3 spinal segments in rats. Cutaneous blood flows from left and right hind foot pads were recorded with laser Doppler flow perfusion monitors. SCS was applied through a ball electrode at 60% or 90% of MT. U0126, an inhibitor of ERK kinase, or LY294002, an inhibitor of PI3K upstream of AKT, was applied to the lumbar 3-5 spinal segments (n=7, each group).

RESULTS

U0126 (100 nM, 5 microM and 250 microM) significantly attenuated SCS-induced vasodilation at 60% (100 nM: P<0.05; 5 microM and 250 microM: P<0.01, respectively) and 90% of MT (100 nM and 5 microM: P<0.05; 250 microM: P<0.01, respectively). LY294002 at 100 microM also attenuated SCS-induced vasodilation at 60% and 90% of MT (P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that ERK and AKT pathways are involved in SCS-induced vasodilation.

Roles of peripheral terminals of transient receptor potential vanilloid-1 containing sensory fibers in spinal cord stimulation-induced peripheral vasodilation

BACKGROUND

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is used to relieve ischemic pain and improve peripheral blood flow in selected patients with peripheral arterial diseases. Our previous studies show that antidromic activation of transient receptor potential vanilloid-1 (TRPV1) containing sensory fibers importantly contributes to SCS-induced vasodilation.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether peripheral terminals of TRPV1 containing sensory fibers produces vasodilation that depends upon the release of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and nitric oxide (NO) during SCS.

METHODS

A unipolar ball electrode was placed on the left dorsal column at lumbar spinal cord segments 2-3 in sodium pentobarbital anesthetized, paralyzed and ventilated rats. Cutaneous blood flow from left and right hindpaws was recorded with laser Doppler flow perfusion monitors. SCS was applied through a ball electrode at 30%, 60%, 90% and 300% of motor threshold. Resiniferatoxin (RTX; 2 microg/ml, 100 microl), an ultra potent analog of capsaicin, was injected locally into the left hindpaw to functionally inactivate TRPV-1 containing sensory terminals. In another set of experiments, CGRP(8-37), an antagonist of the CGRP-1 receptor, was injected at 0.06, 0.12 or 0.6 mg/100 microl into the left hindpaw to block CGRP responses; N-omega-nitro-l-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME), a nonselective nitric-oxide synthase (NOS) inhibitor, was injected at 0.02 or 0.2 mg/100 microl into the left hindpaw to block nitric oxide synthesis; (4S)-N-(4-Amino-5[aminoethyl]aminopentyl)-N'-nitroguanidine, TFA, a neuronal NOS inhibitor, was injected at 0.02 or 0.1 mg/100 microl into the left hindpaw to block neuronal nitric oxide synthesis.

RESULTS

SCS at all intensities produced vasodilation in the left hindpaw, but not in the right. RTX administration attenuated SCS-induced vasodilation at all intensities in the left hindpaw (P<0.05, n=7) compared with responses before RTX. CGRP(8-37) administration attenuated SCS-induced vasodilation in the left hindpaw in a dose dependent manner (linear regression, P<0.05) compared with responses before CGRP(8-37). In addition, L-NAME at a high dose, but not (4S)-N-(4-Amino-5[aminoethyl]aminopentyl)-N'-nitroguanidine, TFA, decreased SCS-induced vasodilation (P<0.05, n=5).

CONCLUSION

While TRPV1, CGRP and NO are known to be localized in the same nerve terminals, our data indicate that SCS-induced vasodilation depends on CGRP release, but not NO release. NO, released from endothelial cells, may be associated with vascular smooth muscle relaxation and peripheral blood flow increase in response to SCS.