Strength of fixation of anterior vertebral body screws

Evaluation of the screw position and angle using a post-contoured plate in the open wedge high tibial osteotomy according to the correction degree and surgical technique

BACKGROUND

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the screw insertion angle and orientation with an anatomical plate that is post-contoured to the surface geometry of the proximal tibia after open wedge high tibial osteotomy.

METHODS

From March 2012 to June 2014, 31 uni-planar and 38 bi-planar osteotomies were evaluated. Postoperative computed tomography data obtained after open wedge high tibial osteotomy using a locking plate were used for reconstruction of the 3 dimensional model with Mimics v.16.0 of the proximal tibia and locking plate. Measurement data were compared between 2 groups (gap lesser than or equal to 10mm (Group 1) and gap greater than 10mm(Group 2)). These data were also compared between the uniplanar (Group 3) and bi-planar (Group 4) osteotomy groups.

FINDINGS

Dimensions of the medial proximal tibia of the sagittal plane, positions of the screw hole in the sagittal plane, and angles of screw insertion of all planes were not statistically different, regardless of the correction degree and operative technique. Additionally, angles of screw insertion were larger at the most anterior and posterior screw in the axial plane and most inferior screw showed smallest angle in the coronal plane.

INTERPRETATION

Using a post-contoured plate, the position and angle of the screw insertion were not different in the direction of the lateral hinge, regardless of the correction degree and operative technique. This could imply that it could be used universally in the open wedge high tibial osteotomy.

Osseointegration of Titanium Implants in Onlay of Cerament™, a New Ceramic Bone Substitute

The purpose was to investigate whether a new biphasic and injectable ceramic bone substitute Cerament™ that rapidly remodels to bone, may contribute to the retention of titanium implant screws during the healing period, and to analyze the pattern of bone formation around titanium implants.Titanium screws were implanted in rat tibiae and embedded with or without Cerament™ on the cortical surface. Torsional resistance was measured after 1 day, and after 6 and 12 weeks. Implant areas without bone substitute were analyzed histologically for comparison. The torsional resistance increased over time as the screws were osseointegrated. There was no difference in resistance between screws embedded in the bone substitute and control screws. The bone apposition was more pronounced on the proximal side of the screw than on the distal side. Cerament™ is capable of conducting bone growth from a cortical bone surface. The newly formed bone in this application does not significantly add to the osseointegrative strength of the implant screw, as measured by torque resistance, during the first 12 weeks.

A BIOMECHANICAL STUDY OF SHEAR LOAD ON BONE–SCREW INTERFACE OF THORACOLUMBAR VERTEBRAE

Vertebral screw failure by cutting through or pulling out of the vertebral body is common in intraoperative and postoperative stages of anterior thoracolumbar surgery, especially in osteoporotic patients. This biomechanical study was conducted to investigate the maximum shear force thoracolumbar vertebrae can withstand and the corresponding displacement of screws and analyze their correlation with vertebral bone mineral density. Forty individual vertebra specimens (T11-L3) were obtained from eight fresh adult cadaveric thoracolumbar spine specimens and randomly divided into an experimental group and a control group. Screws were placed in the center point of vertebrae and penetrated the contralateral cortex. Shear loading and axial pullout tests were conducted on the experimental group while only axial pullout test was conducted on the control group. The maximum shear forces and maximum axial pullout forces were recorded. The conditions of vertebral body destruction and screw channel were observed and the maximum axial pullout forces were recorded and analyzed. A large amount of thread bone debris was observed in the control group. In the experimental group, however, only a small amount of thread bone debris was observed; the widths of screw paths were larger than those in the control group and gradually increased from screw tips in the direction of loading. The vertebral bodies had an average shear strength of [Formula: see text][Formula: see text]N, and the corresponding average screw displacement was [Formula: see text][Formula: see text]mm. Linear regression analysis showed that the shear strength had a significant positive correlation with vertebral bone mineral density (BMD) (r[Formula: see text][Formula: see text][Formula: see text]0.958, P[Formula: see text][Formula: see text][Formula: see text]0.01), while the screw displacement had a significant negative correlation with vertebral BMD (r[Formula: see text][Formula: see text][Formula: see text]−0.933, P[Formula: see text][Formula: see text][Formula: see text]0.01). No significant difference in bone density was found between the destruction and the control groups (P[Formula: see text][Formula: see text][Formula: see text]0.05); the difference in maximum axial pullout strength between the destruction and the control groups was significant (P[Formula: see text][Formula: see text][Formula: see text]0.01). These results indicated that vertebral BMD positively correlated with the maximum shear force and negatively with the screw displacement. It is important that the corrective strength for spinal deformity may affect bone–screw interface in anterior thoracolumbar surgery.

Impact of constrained dual-screw anchorage on holding strength and the resistance to cyclic loading in anterior spinal deformity surgery: a comparative biomechanical study

STUDY DESIGN

Biomechanical in vitro laboratory study.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the biomechanical performance of 3 fixation concepts used for anterior instrumented scoliosis correction and fusion (AISF).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

AISF is an ideal estimate for selective fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Correction is mediated using rods and screws anchored in the vertebral bodies. Application of large correction forces can promote early weakening of the implant-vertebra interfaces, with potential postoperative loss of correction, implant dislodgment, and nonunion. Therefore, improvement of screw-rod anchorage characteristics with AISF is valuable.

METHODS

A total of 111 thoracolumbar vertebrae harvested from 7 human spines completed a testing protocol. Age of specimens was 62.9 ± 8.2 years. Vertebrae were potted in polymethylmethacrylate and instrumented using 3 different devices with identical screw length and unicortical fixation: single constrained screw fixation (SC fixation), nonconstrained dual-screw fixation (DNS fixation), and constrained dual-screw fixation (DC fixation) resembling a novel implant type. Mechanical testing of each implant-vertebra unit using cyclic loading and pullout tests were performed after stress tests were applied mimicking surgical maneuvers during AISF. Test order was as follows: (1) preload test 1 simulating screw-rod locking and cantilever forces; (2) preload test 2 simulating compression/distraction maneuver; (3) cyclic loading tests with implant-vertebra unit subjected to stepwise increased cyclic loading (maximum: 200 N) protocol with 1000 cycles at 2 Hz, tests were aborted if displacement greater than 2 mm occurred before reaching 1000 cycles; and (4) coaxial pullout tests at a pullout rate of 5 mm/min. With each test, the mode of failure, that is, shear versus fracture, was noted as well as the ultimate load to failure (N), number of implant-vertebra units surpassing 1000 cycles, and number of cycles and related loads applied.

RESULTS

Thirty-three percent of vertebrae surpassed 1000 cycles, 38% in the SC group, 19% in the DNS group, and 43% in the DC group. The difference between the DC group and the DNS group yielded significance (P = 0.04). For vertebrae not surpassing 1000 cycles, the number of cycles at implant displacement greater than 2 mm in the SC group was 648.7 ± 280.2 cycles, in the DNS group was 478.8 ± 219.0 cycles, and in the DC group was 699.5 ± 150.6 cycles. Differences between the SC group and the DNS group were significant (P = 0.008) as between the DC group and the DNS group (P = 0.0009). Load to failure in the SC group was 444.3 ± 302 N, in the DNS group was 527.7 ± 273 N, and in the DC group was 664.4 ± 371.5 N. The DC group outperformed the other constructs. The difference between the SC group and the DNS group failed significance (P = 0.25), whereas there was a significant difference between the SC group and the DC group (P = 0.003). The DC group showed a strong trend toward increased load to failure compared with the DNS group but without significance (P = 0.067). Surpassing 1000 cycles had a significant impact on the maximum load to failure in the SC group (P = 0.0001) and in the DNS group (P = 0.01) but not in the DC group (P = 0.2), which had the highest number of vertebrae surpassing 1000 cycles.

CONCLUSION

Constrained dual-screw fixation characteristics in modern AISF implants can improve resistance to cyclic loading and pullout forces. DC constructs bear the potential to reduce the mechanical shortcomings of AISF.

Surgical stabilization of the spine in the osteoporotic patient

Osteoporosis affects millions of US citizens, and millions more are at risk for developing the disease. Several operative techniques are available to the spine surgeon to provide care for those affected by osteoporosis. The types of osteoporosis, common surgical complications, medical optimization, and surgical techniques in the osteoporotic spine are reviewed, with an emphasis on preoperative planning.

Pullout of a lumbar plate with varying screw lengths

Background

Screw length pertains to stability in various orthopedic fixation devices. There is little or no information on the relationship between plate pullout strength and screw length in anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) plate constructs in the literature. Such a description may prove useful, especially in the treatment of osteoporotic patients where maximizing construct stability is of utmost importance. Our purpose is to describe the influence of screw length on ALIF plate stability in severely and mildly osteoporotic bone foam models.

Methods

Testing was performed on polyurethane foam blocks with densities of 0.08 g/cm³ and 0.16 g/cm³. Four-screw, single-level ALIF plate constructs were secured to the polyurethane foam blocks by use of sets of self-tapping cancellous bone screws that were 20, 24, 28, 32, and 36 mm in length and 6.0 mm in diameter. Plates were pulled out at 1 mm/min to failure, as defined by consistently decreasing load despite increasing displacement.

Results

Pullout loads in 0.08-g/cm³ foam for 20-, 24-, 28-, 32-, and 36-mm screws averaged 303, 388, 479, 586, and 708 N, respectively, increasing at a mean of 25.2 N/mm. In 0.16-g/cm³ foam, pullout loads for 20-, 24-, 28-, 32-, and 36-mm screws averaged 1004, 1335, 1569, 1907, and 2162 N, respectively, increasing at a mean of 72.2 N/mm.

Conclusions

The use of longer screws in ALIF plate installation is expected to increase construct stability. Stabilization from screw length in osteoporotic patients, however, is limited.

Influência do local de ancoragem dos implantes na vértebra sobre o torque de inserção e resistência ao arrancamento

OBJETIVO: Avaliar a influência do sítio anatômico da ancoragem dos implantes na vértebra sobre a resistência ao arrancamento e o torque de inserção dos parafusos pediculares com alma cônica e cilíndrica. MÉTODOS: Parafusos cilíndricos e com alma cônica foram inseridos no pedículo e corpo vertebral de 10 vértebras lombares (L4-L5) de vitelos. Foram avaliados o torque de inserção e a resistência ao arrancamento dos parafusos inseridos no corpo e no pedículo vertebral. RESULTADOS: Os valores do torque de inserção e resistência ao arrancamento foram maiores nos parafusos de alma cilíndrica e alma cônica inseridos no pedículo vertebral. CONCLUSÕES: A ancoragem dos implantes no pedículo vertebral apresentou maiores valores do torque de inserção e da força de arrancamento que os implantes inseridos no corpo vertebral nos dois tipos de parafusos utilizados.

A biomechanical study of top screw pullout in anterior scoliosis correction constructs

STUDY DESIGN.: Biomechanical testing of vertebral body screw pullout resistance with relevance to top screw pullout in thoracoscopic anterior scoliosis constructs.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the effect of screw positioning and angulation on pullout resistance of vertebral body screws, where the pullout takes place along a curved path as occurs in anterior scoliosis constructs.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Top screw pullout is a significant clinical problem in thoracoscopic anterior scoliosis surgery, with rates of up to18% reported in the literature.

METHODS

A custom-designed biomechanical test rig was used to perform pullout tests of Medtronic anterior vertebral screws where the pullout occurred along an arc of known radius. Using synthetic bone blocks, a range of pullout radiuses and screw angulations were tested, in order to determine an "optimal" configuration. The optimal configuration was then compared with standard screw positioning using a series of tests on ovine vertebrae (n=29).

RESULTS

Screw angulation has a small but significant effect on pullout resistance, with maximum strength being achieved at 10-degree cephalad angulation. Combining 10-degree cephalad angulation with maximal spacing between the top 2 screws (maximum pullout radius) increased the pullout resistance by 88% compared with "standard" screw positioning (screws inserted perpendicular to rod at midbody height).

CONCLUSION

The positioning of the top screw in anterior scoliosis constructs can significantly alter its pullout resistance.

Screw angulation affects bone-screw stresses and bone graft load sharing in anterior cervical corpectomy fusion with a rigid screw-plate construct: a finite element model study

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Anterior corpectomy and reconstruction with bone graft and a rigid screw-plate construct is an established procedure for treatment of cervical neural compression. Despite its reliability in relieving symptoms, there is a high rate of construct failure, especially in multilevel cases.

PURPOSE

There has been no study evaluating the biomechanical effects of screw angulation on construct stability; this study investigates the C4-C7 construct stability and load-sharing properties among varying screw angulations in a rigid plate-screw construct.

STUDY DESIGN

A finite element model of a two-level cervical corpectomy with static anterior cervical plate.

METHODS

A three-dimensional finite element (FE) model of an intact C3-T1 segment was developed and validated. From this intact model, a fusion model (two-level [C5, C6] anterior corpectomy) was developed and validated. After corpectomy, allograft interbody fusion with a rigid anterior screw-plate construct was created from C4 to C7. Five additional FE models were developed from the fusion model corresponding to five different combinations of screw angulations within the vertebral bodies (C4, C7): (0 degrees, 0 degrees), (5 degrees, 5 degrees), (10 degrees, 10 degrees), (15 degrees, 15 degrees), and (15 degrees, 0 degrees). The fifth fusion model was termed as a hybrid fusion model.

RESULTS

The stability of a two-level corpectomy reconstruction is not dependent on the position of the screws. Despite the locked screw-plate interface, some degree of load sharing is transmitted to the graft. The load seen by the graft and the shear stress at the bone-screw junction is dependent on the angle of the screws with respect to the end plate. Higher stresses are seen at more divergent angles, particularly at the lower level of the construct.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that screw divergence from the end plates not only increases load transmission to the graft but also predisposes the screws to higher shear forces after corpectomy reconstruction. In particular, the inferior screw demonstrated larger stress than the upper-level screws. In the proposed hybrid fusion model, lower stresses on the bone graft, end plates, and bone-screw interface were recorded, inferring lower construct failure (end-plate fractures and screw pullout) potential at the inferior construct end.

Screw orientation and plate type (variable- vs. fixed-angle) effect strength of fixation for in vitro biomechanical testing of the Synthes CSLP

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Two common justifications for orienting cervical screws in an angled direction are to increase pullout strength and to allow use of longer screws. This concept is widely taught and has guided implant design. Fixed- versus variable-angle systems may offer strength advantages. Despite these teachings, there is a paucity of supporting biomechanical evidence. The purpose of our study is to test the influence of screw orientation and plate design on the maximum screw pullout force.

PURPOSE

This study evaluates the effect of screw orientation and plate type (fixed- vs. variable-angle) on screw pullout strength.

STUDY DESIGN

Anterior cervical plates of both a fixed- and variable-angle CSLP, were tested for peak pullout strength in a direct plate pullout model using polyurethane foam bone, which models osteoporotic bone.

METHODS

Self-tapping, locking screws (4.0x14mm and 4.0x16mm) were used. Screws were oriented in the fixed-angle plate in the standard fashion. In the variable plate, screws were instrumented in three different orientations. Biomechanical testing was performed on an Instron DynaMight 8841 servohydraulic testing machine, measuring maximum pullout force under a displacement-controlled pullout rate of 1mm/min. Five samples were tested per group.

RESULTS

When all screws were placed 90 degrees to the plate, there was a significantly increased peak pullout strength (412.8+/-22.2N) compared with when all screws were placed 12 degrees "up and in" (376.2+/-24.3N, p less than or equal to .03). When the 90 degrees construct was reproduced using 14-mm screws and compared with 16-mm screws oriented 12 degrees "all up and in," there was still significantly higher pullout strength with the all 90 degrees construct (434.2+/-28.7N vs. 376.2+/-24.3N, p less than or equal to .009). The fixed-angle plate had a significantly decreased peak pullout strength (288.2+/-15.7N) compared with the variable-angle plate (416.6+/-12.6N) (p less than .00001) when the screws were placed in the same orientation. Overall, the variable-angle plate, regardless of the orientation of screws, had a significantly greater pullout strength than the fixed-angle plate (p less than .001).

CONCLUSIONS

In this system, a variable-angle plate has greater pullout strength than a fixed-angle plate, regardless of the orientation of screws. With the variable-angle plate, a construct of all screws 12 degrees "up and in" is the weakest configuration. We found that with the 90 degrees construct, both 16- and 14-mm screws performed significantly better than 16-mm convergent screws. These findings are remarkable because they contradict the current doctrine. This may be a function of plate-dependent factors and should not be applied universally to all plate systems. Further study of screw orientation in additional plating systems is warranted.

Anterior and thoracoscopic scoliosis surgery for idiopathic scoliosis

Surgical management of idiopathic scoliosis is based on the natural history of this spinal disorder and on the likelihood of developing a worsening deformity. Anterior surgical treatments continue to evolve and provide advantages over posterior procedures in specific instances. Open and thoracoscopic anterior approaches allow direct access to the anterior stabilizing structures of the spine, enable mobilization of a rigid deformity, and provide a large surface area for arthrodesis. Thoracoscopic procedures provide a more cosmetically appealing alternative to a large midline posterior or anterolateral thoracotomy scar. Although the indications and contraindications for anterior versus posterior surgical intervention (for thoracic and thoracolumbar curve patterns) have been defined to some degree, there remains appropriate flexibility in the decision-making process, allowing the surgeon to make an optimal recommendation for each patient based on surgeon experience and patient needs.

Screw pull-out force is dependent on screw orientation in an anterior cervical plate construct

Two common justifications for orienting cervical screws in an angled direction is to increase pull-out strength and to allow use of longer screws. This concept is widely taught and has guided implant design. Fixed versus variable angle systems may offer strength advantages. The purpose of our study is to test the influence of screw orientation and plate design on the maximum screw pull-out load. Variable and fixed angle 4.0 x 15 mm and 4.0 x 13 mm self-tapping screws were used to affix a Medtronic Atlantis cervical plate to polyurethane foam bone samples (density 0.160/cm). This synthetic product is a model of osteoporotic cancellous bone. The fixed angle screws can only be placed at 12 degrees convergent to the midline and 12 degrees in the cephalad/caudal ("12 degrees up and in") direction. Three groups were tested: (1) all fixed angle screws, (2) variable angle, all screws 12 degrees up and in, (3) variable angle, all screws 90 degrees to the plate. Plate constructs were pulled off with an Instron DynaMight 8841 servohydrolic machine measuring for maximum screw pull-out force. There was no difference between group 1, fixed angle (288.4 +/- 37.7 N) (mean +/- SD) and 2, variable angle group (297.7 +/- 41.31 N P< or =0.73). There was a significant increase in maximum pull-out force to failure for the construct with all screws at 90 degrees (415.2+/-17.4 N) compared with all screws 12 degrees "up and in" (297.4 +/- 41.3 N, P< or =0.0016). Group 3 done with 13 mm screws, showed a trend toward better pull-out strength, compared to group 2 w/15 mm screws (345.2 +/- 20.5 vs. 297.4 +/- 41.3, P< or =0.06). In this plate pull-out model, screw orientation influences maximum force to failure. When all 4 screws are 90 degrees to the plate the construct has the greatest ability to resist pullout. Fixed angle designs show no advantage over variable angle. These findings are contrary to current teaching.

Pullout strength of anterior spinal instrumentation: a product comparison of seven screws in calf vertebral bodies

A lot of new implant devices for spine surgery are coming onto the market, in which vertebral screws play a fundamental role. The new screws developed for surgery of spine deformities have to be compared to established systems. A biomechanical in vitro study was designed to assess the bone-screw interface fixation strength of seven different screws used for correction of scoliosis in spine surgery. The objectives of the current study were twofold: (1) to evaluate the initial strength at the bone-screw interface of newly developed vertebral screws (Universal Spine System II) compared to established systems (product comparison) and (2) to evaluate the influence of screw design, screw diameter, screw length and bone mineral density on pullout strength. Fifty-six calf vertebral bodies were instrumented with seven different screws (USS II anterior 8.0 mm, USS II posterior 6.2 mm, KASS 6.25 mm, USS II anterior 6.2 mm, USS II posterior 5.2 mm, USS 6.0 mm, USS 5.0 mm). Bone mineral density (BMD) was determined by quantitative computed tomography (QCT). Failure in axial pullout was tested using a displacement-controlled universal test machine. USS II anterior 8.0 mm showed higher pullout strength than all other screws. The difference constituted a tendency (P = 0.108) when compared to USS II posterior 6.2 mm (+19%) and was significant in comparison to the other screws (+30 to +55%, P < 0.002). USS II posterior 6.2 mm showed significantly higher pullout strength than USS 5.0 mm (+30%, P = 0.014). The other screws did not differ significantly in pullout strength. Pullout strength correlated significantly with BMD (P = 0.0015) and vertebral body width/screw length (P < 0.001). The newly developed screws for spine surgery (USS II) show higher pullout strength when compared to established systems. Screw design had no significant influence on pullout force in vertebral body screws, but outer diameter of the screw, screw length and BMD are good predictors of pullout resistance.

Biomechanics of cantilever "plow" during anterior thoracic scoliosis correction

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Anterior instrumentation is often used for correction of thoracic scoliosis. Loss of spinal correction may occur after failure at the bone-implant interface, and forces on the bone-implant interface during scoliosis correction remain unclear.

PURPOSE

Evaluate two different mechanisms of loading associated with anterior scoliosis correction.

STUDY SETTING

In vitro biomechanics lab.

METHODS

Polyurethane foam and human cadaveric thoracic vertebral bodies were instrumented with transvertebral body screws. Bone-implant interface failure loads were measured during constrained, fixed-angle screw translation, as well as unconstrained translation allowing coronal plane screw rotation. Vertebral body staples were randomly assigned to both conditions.

RESULTS

Data were consistent across foam and cadaveric specimens. Failures occurred at significantly lower loads during unconstrained translation (with rotation) compared with constrained translation. Staple usage significantly increased the load to failure in both testing modes. In cadaveric bone, the constrained plowing load to failure was 562N+110N versus 188N+20N in the unconstrained testing. With a staple, these values increased to 694N+53N and 530N+100N, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The 280% increase in cadaveric failure loads when a staple was added in the unconstrained testing method exceeds previous reports. The unconstrained method of plow simulated anterior scoliosis instrumentation when a rod was cantilevered and compressed into position. Supplemental vertebral body staples may be clinically indicated, particularly at the ends of the construct where residual deforming forces remain the greatest.

Biomechanical comparison of the screw-bone interface: optimization of 1 and 2 screw constructs by varying screw diameter

STUDY DESIGN

In vitro biomechanical investigation of 1 and 2-screw anterior scoliosis constructs with varying screw diameters.

OBJECTIVE

To determine a possible optimal configuration of screw number and diameter at varying levels within the thoracic spine for anterior vertebral body fixation.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Single-rod systems are typical in anterior thoracic and thoracolumbar correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis; although dual rod systems may offer more flexural stability. Loss of fixation remains problematic, particularly in the proximal thoracic vertebrae, and it remains unclear how screw diameter or the number of screws within the vertebrae affect fixation.

METHODS

Individual vertebral levels from 10 cadaveric thoracic spines were randomly assigned to either 1 or 2 screws of 5, 6, or 7-mm diameter. Bone-screw interface failures were created in coronal plane cantilever plow, and failure loads were compared across vertebral levels for each instrumentation method.

RESULTS

Two-screw constructs had significantly higher failure loads than single-screw constructs, while increasing screw diameter also produced significant changes in fixation strength. Two-screws had improved performance in the mid and lower thoracic spine, while a single screw was more stable in the upper thoracic spine.

CONCLUSIONS

Failure modes for 1-screw constructs almost entirely (89%) showed gradual plowing through the bone, whereas acute fracture through the vertebral body or pedicles were common forms of failure (85%) for 2-screw constructs.

Influence of screw positioning in a new anterior spine fixator on implant loosening in osteoporotic vertebrae

STUDY DESIGN

A biomechanical study was designed to assess implant cut-out of three different angular stable anterior spinal implants. Subsidence of the implant relative to the vertebral body was measured during an in vitro cyclic loading test.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of the study was to evaluate two prototypes (Synthes) of a new anterior spine fixator with different screw angulations in comparison to the established MACSTL(R) Twin Screw Concept (Aesculap). The influence of factors like load-bearing cross-sectional area, screw angulation and bone mineral density upon implant stability should be investigated.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Epidemiologic data predict a growing demand for appropriate anterior spinal fixation devices especially in patients with inferior structural and mechanical bone properties. Although different concepts for anterior spinal instrumentation systems have been tried out, implant stability is still a problem.

METHODS

Three angular stable, anterior spinal implants were tested using 24 human lumbar osteoporotic vertebrae (L1-L5; age 84 (73-92)): MASC TL system (Aesculap); prototype 1 (MP1) with 18 degrees and prototype 2 (MP2) with 40 degrees screw angulation (both Synthes). All implants consisted of two screws with different outer screw diameters: 7-mm polyaxial screw with 6.5-mm stabilization screw (MASC TL), two 5-mm locking-head screws each (MP1 and MP2). Bone mineral density (BMD) and vertebral body width of the three specimen groups were evenly distributed. The specimens were loaded in craniocaudal direction (1Hz) for 1000 cycles each at three consecutive load steps; 10-100 N, 10-200 N and 10-400 N. During cyclic loading subsidence of the implant relative to the vertebral body was measured in the unloaded condition. Cycle number at failure (defined as a subsidence of 2 mm) was determined for each specimen. A survival analysis (Cox Regression) was performed to detect differences between implant groups at a probability level of 95%.

RESULTS

High correlations were found between BMD and number of cycles until failure (MP1; r = 0.905, P = 0.013; MP2: r = 0.640, P = 0.121; MACS TL: r = 0.904, P = 0.013) and between load bearing cross sectional area and number of cycles until failure (MP1: r = 0.849, P = 0.032;MP2: r = 0.692, P = 0.085; MACS TL: r = 0.902, P = 0.014). Both Prototypes survived significantly longer than the MACS TL implant (MP1: P = 0.012, MP2: P = 0.014). The survival behaviour of MP1 and MP2 was not significantly different (P = 0.354).

CONCLUSIONS

Implant stability within each implant group was influenced by BMD and load bearing cross-sectional area. The angulation of the two screws did not have a significant influence on cut-out. As conclusion from this study, promising approaches for further implant development are: 1) increase of load-bearing cross-sectional area (e.g., larger outer diameter of the anchorage device), 2) screw positioning in areas of higher BMD (e.g., opposite cortex, proximity to pedicles or the endplates).

The effect of end screw orientation on the stability of anterior instrumentation in cyclic lateral bending

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Screw pullout at the proximal or distal end of multilevel anterior instrumentation can occur clinically. Previous laboratory studies have shown that angulation of vertebral body screws increases screw pullout strength and stability in toggling.

PURPOSE

To determine the effect of end screw angulation on instrumentation construct stability after cyclic, lateral bending.

STUDY DESIGN

A biomechanical study in calf spines comparing two anterior spinal instrumentation constructs, one with parallel polyaxial screws and the other with angled polyaxial end screws.

METHODS

Sixteen instrumented constructs were made from eight thoracic (T8-T12) and eight lumbar calf spines (L1-L5). Eight (four lumbar specimens and four thoracic specimens) had five bicortical screws inserted mid-body and parallel to the end plates. The other eight specimens had two screws angled toward the superior end plates of the top two vertebrae; the middle vertebra had a mid-body screw parallel to the end plate, and the bottom two vertebrae had screws angled towards their inferior end plates. The constructs were then cycled in lateral bending, and the displacements of the two instrumentations with a 10 N-m bending load were compared.

RESULTS

After 10,000 cycles, constructs with parallel end screws exhibited twice the average displacement than those with angled screws: 5.4 mm versus 2.9 mm (p=.031).

CONCLUSION

The use of angled screws at the ends of anterior constructs demonstrated increased construct stability after cycling compared with traditional transverse screws. Although angled screw insertion is technically more difficult and is possible only with specific screw designs, its use might increase instrumentation longevity.

Trabecular architecture of lumbar vertebral pedicle

STUDY DESIGN

Investigation on architecture of lumbar pedicle.

OBJECTIVE

To determine morphological properties of pedicular cancellous bone.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Many researchers have been stimulated to study trabecular architecture by improvements in stereological technology. Although the structure of vertebral cancellous bone has been well studied in the literature, no information is available about the architecture of pedicular cancellous bone.

METHODS

Eight cadaveric L3 lumbar vertebrae were harvested. After collecting the bone mineral density (BMD) data on the vertebrae, pedicle isthmuses were removed from the vertebral bodies using a reciprocal hand saw. The BMD measurements were done on the dissected pedicle isthmus specimens. All the specimens were then analyzed using a micro-computed tomography unit. Morphologic parameters of trabecular bone were calculated.

RESULTS

Bone volume was found as 0.209 +/- 0.046, whereas Tb.Th, Tb.Sp, and Tb.N were found to be 0.201 +/- 0.035 mm, 0.930 +/- 0.123 mm, and 1.098 +/- 0.136 mm(-1), respectively. Connectivity density and structure model index were observed to be 3.135 +/- 0.918 mm(-3), 0.37, whereas degree of anisotropy value was 1.241 +/- 0.093. Vertebral BMD could explain 63% of variance in bone density of a pedicle isthmus.

CONCLUSIONS

The structure of the pedicular cancellous bone is somewhat different from that of vertebral body. The trabecular architecture within the pedicle isthmus is isotropic and plate-like. The thickness and number of the trabeculae were greater than those of vertebral trabeculae. Decrease in the bone volume with age is mainly by thinning of the trabeculae and increasing in trabecular spacing, but not by loss of mass.

Pull-out strength of the suprapedicle claw construct: a biomechanical study

The pull-out of the superior screw is a well recognized problem in anterior instrumentation of the spine for scoliosis. A biomechanical pull-out study of anterior vertebral body screw in cadaveric thoracic spine was therefore designed to investigate and compare the pull-out strength of three different anterior vertebral body fixations using the AO Universal Spine System: simple bicortical screw, bicortical screw with an opposite washer (sometimes called pull-out resistant nut), and a new construct made of a bicortical screw with the addition of a suprapedicular hook on the same vertebra (or claw construct). The T4 to T9 vertebral bodies from six human cadavers (total of 36 specimens) were instrumented with three different instrumentation constructs after measuring the bone mineral density of each individual vertebra. After stabilization of the vertebral bodies, the screws were extracted employing a material testing system using axial pull-out. The maximum axial forces were recorded at the time of the construct failure. The mean ultimate fixation strength (UFS) values after being adjusted for bone mineral density and vertebral body diameter were 631, 711, and 1244 N for the three different constructs, respectively (screw alone, screw with an opposite washer, and screw with a suprapedicle claw). The difference in UFS was not significant for the first two constructs tested (screw alone and screw with an opposite washer). However, the difference in ultimate fixation strength between the claw and the other constructs was highly significant (P<0.0001). Specimens with low BMD did not benefit as much from claw construct as the ones did with a normal BMD. The failure mode of each construct was described, but was in neither case judged dangerous for the spinal cord. This study shows that the suprapedicle claw construct improves the pull-out strength of an anterior vertebral body screw by 80%, and changes the mode of failure so as not to rely only on the screw characteristics or solely on the vertebral body. By adding a suprapedicle hook in a claw configuration, one may prevent superior screw pull-out in anterior spine surgery for scoliosis.

A biomechanical analysis of triangulation of anterior vertebral double-screw fixation

OBJECTIVE

This study tested the hypothesis that triangulation of two anterior vertebral screws without penetration of the cortex offers more resistance to pullout than two screws placed in parallel and penetrated.

DESIGN

The pullout strength for two parallel or two triangulated anterior vertebral screws fixation, with a uni-cortical or bi-cortical purchase, were tested and compared to the strength of a single-screw fixation with a bi-cortical purchase. Four porcine spines (six months old) were used for biomechanical test and bone mineral density was measured for each specimen before testing.

BACKGROUND

The potential hazards from penetration by anterior vertebral cortex screws including neurovascular and organs injuries are well documented. However, bi-cortical screw penetration is widely recognized as necessary for good anterior spinal stabilization. The authors are not aware of any biomechanical study on the anterior placement of triangulated vertebral screws without penetration and its effect on the fixation strength of anterior vertebral device remains unclear.

METHODS

In this study five modes of screw fixations in lateral vertebral bodies were performed: Group A, triangulated screws with one screw penetration; Group B, triangulated screws without penetration; Group C, parallel penetrating screws; Group D, parallel nonpenetrating screws; and Group E, a single-screw with bi-cortical purchase. Biomechanical analysis with a material testing system machine was performed to determine the pull out strength of each configuration.

RESULTS

The results showed that the pullout strength in the various double-screw fixation modes were statistically increased as compared to that of the single-screw with bi-cortical purchase mode. There existed statistical differences (P<0.05) between Groups A and B, Groups C and D and Groups D and E, respectively. However, no significant difference was found between Groups B and C (P=0.144).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the current data, triangulation of two anterior vertebral screws without penetration of the cortex (Group B) achieved pullout strengths similar to that of two-parallel double-cortical screws (Group C). The authors believe that this is an attractive alternative in anterior spinal instrumentation avoiding the potential risks of cortical penetration. However, in the event of pullout failure, the triangulation configuration will produce a more disastrous consequence.

RELEVANCE

Triangulation of two anterior vertebral screws without penetration of the cortex achieve pullout strengths similar to that of two-parallel double-cortical screws. This is an attractive alternative in anterior spinal instrumentation that avoids the potential risks of cortical penetration.

Anterior thoracic scoliosis constructs: effect of rod diameter and intervertebral cages on multi-segmental construct stability

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Many studies have reported on the use of anterior instrumentation for thoracolumbar scoliosis and more recently thoracic scoliosis. However, the optimal construct design remains an issue of debate.

PURPOSE

To optimize construct design and enhance implant survival until a successful spinal arthrodesis is achieved.

STUDY DESIGN

This study evaluated the effect of rod diameter and intervertebral cages on construct stiffness and rod strain using a long-segment, anterior thoracic scoliosis model with varying levels of intervertebral reconstruction.

METHODS

Sixteen fresh-frozen calf spine specimens (T1 to L1) were divided into two groups based on rod diameter reconstruction (4 mm and 5 mm). Testing included axial compression, anterior flexion, extension and lateral bending with variations in the number and level of intervertebral cage reconstructions: apical disc (one), end discs (two), apical and end discs (three), all seven levels (seven). Multisegmental construct stiffness and rod strain were determined and normalized to the intact specimen for analysis.

RESULTS

The seven-level intervertebral cage construct showed significantly greater stiffness in axial compression for both the 4-mm (366% increased stiffness) and 5-mm (607% increased stiffness) rod groups (p<.001). The remaining constructs were not significantly different from each other (p>.05). In flexion, similar results were obtained for the 4-mm construct (p<.001) but not the 5-mm construct, because the reconstruction-alone, one-, two- and three-cage constructs were all significantly stiffer than the intact specimen (p<.05). Multisegmental construct stiffness under extension loading, as well as right and left lateral bending, also exhibited significant differences between the seven-level interbody cage reconstructions and the remaining constructs. Apical rod strain for both the 4-mm-rod and 5-mm-rod groups were significantly higher for the two cage constructs (a cage at either end but not the apex where the strain gauges were located) as compared with the other constructs (p<.05). These differences were more pronounced in the 4-mm-rod group. Similar results were obtained in anterior flexion, extension and lateral bending.

CONCLUSIONS

Intervertebral cages at every level significantly improved construct stiffness compared with increasing rod diameter alone. Moreover, cages markedly decreased rod strain, and when structural interbody supports were not used, axial compression created the greatest rod strain.

Enhanced primary stability through additional cementable cannulated rescue screw for anterior thoracolumbar plate application

OBJECT

The authors conducted a study to investigate the biomechanical in vitro influence of a new anchorage system for fixation of anterior stabilization devices and the possibility of using additional cement after screw insertion to compensate for poor bone quality. The incidence of osteoporosis-related fractures has increased nearly twofold in the last decade. Because of problems associated with anterior screw fixation such as loosening, mechanical failure, and the weakness of osteoporotic bone, current surgical treatments of vertebral body (VB) fractures are problematic. This is due to poor fixation strength of anterior screws in the adjacent segments. The aim of this study was to determine whether a new cemented and uncemented VB screw provides improved primary stability following placement of anterior instrumentation in cases of fracture.

METHODS

The primary stability-related parameters of a new uncemented/cemented screw were compared with those of conventional monocortical screw fixation in a burst fracture model in which strut graft and anterior overbridging instrumentation were used. The use of the new uncemented screw improved the range of motion (ROM) of the stabilized spine in flexion-extension by approximately 22%, in rotation by 20%, and in lateral bending by 15%. Additional cementation improved the ROM by approximately 41% in flexion-extension, 32% in rotation, and 30% in lateral bending compared with conventional monocortical screw fixation.

CONCLUSIONS

The new cannulated screw improves fixation strength and primary stability parameters. It is useful in the initial treatment of fractures in cases of poor bone quality and as a rescue device if previously inserted screws do not remain securely in place.

Anterior Vertebral Body Screw Pullout Testing With The Hollow Modular Anchorage System - A Comparative in vitro Study. Hohltonnenschrauben als neues Verankerungskonzept an der Wirbelsäule - Lastauszugsversuche als biomechanische Vergleichsstudie

Pullout of implants at the proximal and distal ends of multilevel constructs represents a common spinal surgery problem. One goal concerning the development of new spinal implants is to achieve stable fixation together with the least invasive approach to the spinal column. This biomechanical study measures the influence of different modes of implantation and different screw designs, including a new monocortical system, on the maximum pullout strength of screws inserted ventrolaterally into calf vertebrae. The force pullout of eight different groups were tested and compared. Included were three bicortical used single screws (USS, Zielke-VDS, single KASS). To further increase pullout strength either a second screw (KASS) or a pullout-resistant nut can be added (USS with pullout nut). A completely new concept of anchorage represents the Hollow Modular Anchorage System (MACS-HMA). This hollow titanium implant has an increased outside diameter and is designed for monocortical use. Additionally two screw systems suitable for bicortical use were tested in monocortical mode of anchorage (USS, single KASS). We selected seven vertebrae equal in mean size and bone mineral density for each of the eight groups. The vertebral body and implant were connected to both ends of a servohydraulic testing machine. Displacement controlled distraction was applied until failure at the metal-bone-interface occurred. The maximum axial pullout force was recorded. Mean BMD was 312 +/- 55 mg CaHA/ml in cancellous bone and 498 +/- 98 mg CaHA/ml in cortical bone. The highest resistance to pullout found, measured 4.2 kN (KASS) and 4.0 kN (USS with pullout nut). The mean pullout strength of Zielke-VDS was 2.1 kN, of single KASS 2.5 kN, of MACS-HMA 2.6 kN and of USS 3.2 kN. There was no statistically significant difference (t-test, p > 0.05) between bicortical screws and the new monocortical implant. For the strongest fixation at the proximal or distal end of long spinal constructs the addition of a second screw or a pullout-resistant nut behind the opposite cortex offers even stronger fixation.

Central and juxta-endplate vertebral body screw placement: a biomechanical analysis in a human cadaveric model

STUDY DESIGN

In vitro biomechanical testing of transvertebral body screws in different positions in both axial pull-out and toggle.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the relative strength of unicortical versus bicortical screw fixation within the vertebral body and to determine comparative strength of juxta-endplate and central screw positions with and without staples in both axial pull-out and toggle modes.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Loss of fixation is common in centrally placed screws at the rostral end of a construct. To preserve segmental vessels, juxta-endplate screw positions are often used. The biomechanical strength of such screw placement methods has not been measured.

METHODS

Eighty-three human cadaveric vertebral bodies were tested for axial pull-out and toggle with and without staples. Screw positions included central, juxta superior, and inferior endplate. Juxta-endplate screws were toggled in both the rostral and caudal directions perpendicular to the screw axes.

RESULTS

Unicortical fixation resulted in a 93% decrease in axial pull-out strength compared with bicortical fixation. Centrally placed screws and juxta-endplate screws were equivalent in axial pull-out if no staples were used. The juxta-endplate screw with a staple that was toggled away from the endplate had the highest yield strength, followed by the central screw with a staple, and then the juxta-endplate screw without a staple toggled away from the endplate.

CONCLUSIONS

Bicortical fixation is much stronger than unicortical fixation. Centrally placed screws are significantly stronger when used with a staple. When preservation of segmental vessels is desirable, juxta-endplate screws should be placed in such a manner that compressive forces are directed away from the endplate.

Biomechanical evaluation of anterior spinal instrumentation systems for scoliosis: in vitro fatigue simulation

STUDY DESIGN

A biomechanical study was designed to assess the bone-screw interface fixation strength among five anterior spinal instrumentation systems for scoliosis before and after a fatigue simulation.

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of the current study were twofold: 1) evaluate the static (initial) strength at the bone-screw interface and 2) evaluate dynamic (post fatigue) strength of the bone-screw interface after a fatigue simulation to investigate a possible mechanism for postoperative loss of correction.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Although the recent advancement of anterior instrumentation for scoliosis has permitted shorter fusion segments and improved surgical correction, the loss of correction over the instrumented segments still has been reported in one-rod systems. Little is known about the mechanism for loss of correction.

METHODS

Twenty-five fresh-frozen calf spines (T6-L6) were used. A total of five instrumentation systems included the following: Anterior ISOLA (ISOLA), Bad Wildungen Metz (BWM), Texas Scottish Rite Hospital system (TSRH), Cotrel-Dubousset Hoph (CDH), and Kaneda Anterior Scoliosis System (KASS). Screw pullout and rotational tests in the sagittal plane using a single vertebra were performed to investigate bone-screw interface fixation strength before and after a fatigue simulation. To simulate cyclic loading that the spine could undergo in vivo, a fatigue simulation using compressive-flexion loading up to 24,000 cycles was carried out.

RESULTS

Mean maximum tensile pullout force decreased in the following order: KASS > CDH > BWM > TSRH > ISOLA (F = 29.91, P < 0.0001). KASS blunt tip screw was 26% stronger in pullout force than KASS sharp tip screw (P < 0.05). The one-rod system demonstrated a positive correlation between pullout force and both bone mineral density and screw insertional torque. For fatigue analysis the rotational strength at the most cephalad and caudal segments significantly decreased after a fatigue simulation in the one-rod system (P < 0.05). The two-rod system showed no significant decrease after a fatigue simulation.

CONCLUSIONS

Simulating the cyclic loading to the construct, screw loosening at the bone-screw interface was produced in the one-rod system. This screw loosening may elucidate one mechanism for loss of correction in the one-rod system. The two-rod system may have the potential to minimize the risk of loss of correction.

Augmentation of anterior vertebral body screw fixation by an injectable, biodegradable calcium phosphate bone substitute

STUDY DESIGN

A biomechanical study to evaluate the effects of a biodegradable calcium phosphate (Ca-P) bone substitute on the fixation strength and bending rigidity of vertebral body screws.

OBJECTIVES

To determine if an injectable, biodegradable Ca-P bone substitute provides significant augmentation of anterior vertebral screw fixation in the osteoporotic spine.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) augmented screws have been used clinically; however, there is concern about thermal damage to the neural elements during polymerization of the PMMA as well as its negative effects on bone remodeling. Injectable, biodegradable Ca-P bone substitutes have shown enhanced fixation of pedicle screws.

METHODS

Sixteen fresh cadaveric thoracolumbar vertebrae were randomly divided into two groups: control (no augmentation) (n = 8) and Ca-P bone substitute augmentation (n = 8) groups. Bone-screw fixation rigidity in bending was determined initially and after 10(5) cycles, followed by pullout testing of the screw to failure to determine pullout strength and stiffness.

RESULTS

The bone-screw bending rigidity for the Ca-P bone substitute group was significantly greater than the control group, initially (58%) and after cyclic loading (125%). The pullout strength for Ca-P bone substitute group (1848 +/- 166 N) was significantly greater than the control group (665 +/- 92 N) (P < 0.01). Stiffness in pullout for the Ca-P bone substitute groups (399 +/- 69 N/mm) was significantly higher than the control group (210 +/- 51 N/mm) (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that augmentation of anterior vertebral body screw fixation with a biodegradable Ca-P bone substitute is a potential alternative to the use of PMMA cement.

The cortical shell architecture of human cervical vertebral bodies

STUDY DESIGN

An anatomic study of cervical vertebral bodies.

OBJECTIVES

To provide quantitative information on the cortical shell architecture of the middle and lower cervical vertebral bodies.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Some external dimensions have been measured, but little quantitative data exists for the cortical shell architecture of the vertebral bodies of the cervical spine.

METHODS

Twenty-one human cervical vertebral bodies (C3-C7) were sectioned along parasagittal planes into five 1.7-mm thin slices for each vertebra. Radiographs of each slice were digitized, and external and internal dimensions were measured. Averages and standard deviations were computed. Single factor analysis of variance was used to determine significant (P < 0.05) differences between the vertebral levels.

RESULTS

The superior endplate was thickest in the posterior region (range 0.74-0.89 mm) and thinnest in the anterior region (range 0.44-0.56 mm). The inferior endplate was thickest in the anterior region (range 0.61-0.81 mm) and thinnest in the posterior region (range 0.49-0.62 mm). In the central region, the superior endplate (range 0.42-0.58 mm) was thinner than the inferior endplate (range 0.53-0.64 mm). Variation with vertebral level was dependent on the dimension studied.

CONCLUSIONS

Comprehensive quantitative anatomic data of the middle and lower cervical vertebral bodies have been obtained. This may be useful in improving the understanding of the three-column and other vertebral-fracture theories, the fidelity of the finite element models of cervical spine, and the designs of surgical instrumentation.

Anterior vertebral screw strain with and without solid interspace support

STUDY DESIGN

This in vitro biomechanical study examines segmental anterior vertebral screw strain and solid rod construct stiffness with and without the addition of multilevel, threaded cortical bone dowels in a bovine model.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether strain at the bone-screw interface is higher at the end levels during physiologic range loading, and whether solid interspace support decreases segmental strain on the implant.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Anterior instrumentation provides greater correction and preserves distal motion segments. However, nonunion and implant failure are observed more frequently than with posterior segmental instrumentation, and when observed, loss of fixation occurs at the end levels.

METHODS

Eight calf spines underwent mechanical testing in the following sequence: 1) intact condition, 2) anterior release with anterior solid rod and bicortical rib grafts, and 3) anterior release with anterior solid rod and threaded cortical bone dowels (L2-L5). Instrumented vertebral screws were used to assess strain within the vertebral body by the near cortex, whereas an anterior extensometer spanning the instrumented segments was used to measure segmental displacements to calculate construct stiffness. The protocol included axial compression (-400 N), right lateral bending (4 Nm (Newton-meter), away from the implant), and left lateral bending (4 Nm, toward the implant). Statistical analysis included a one-way analysis of variance and a Student-Newman-Keuls post hoc test. A pilot study was performed using four additional specimens loaded for 4000 cycles to investigate macroscopic loosening after fatigue loading.

RESULTS

In lateral bending toward the implant, the strain was higher at both end levels, with no differences between the rib and dowel reconstructions. The stiffness values were greater than the intact values for both groups. In lateral bending away from the implant, the strain also was higher at both end screws, and the dowel group had less strain at these levels than the rib group. Both groups were stiffer than the intact condition, and the dowel group was stiffer than the rib group. Axial compressive strain also was higher at the end levels, but this difference did not reach statistical significance. The rib group did not reach intact stiffness values, whereas the dowel group was stiffer than the intact condition. The fatigue study showed gross loosening at one or both end levels in all cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Higher strain was observed at the bone-screw interface in both end screws of an anterior solid rod construct during lateral bending, which correlates with the clinically observed failure location. This suggests that physiologic range loading may predispose to failure at the end levels. Disc space augmentation with solid implants increased construct stiffness in all three load paths and decreased strain at the end levels in lateral bending away from the implant. Future implant modifications should achieve better fixation at the end screws, and the current model provides a means to compare different strategies to decrease strain at these levels.

Changes in cadaveric cancellous vertebral bone strength in relation to time. A biomechanical investigation

STUDY DESIGN

A biomechanical study was conducted during a 3.5-day period to test for changes occurring in pullout strengths of cancellous screws inserted into human cadaveric vertebral bodies.

OBJECTIVES

To quantify, within the testing time of 3.5 days, the possible changes to the mechanical properties of cadaveric vertebral bodies, resulting from structural degradation caused by postmortem, time-dependent, autolytic processes during mechanical testing of implant-bone biomechanics.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Biomechanical testing of whole spinal implants and analysis of the screw-bone interface of spinal implants is an area of clinical interest that frequently requires the use of cadaveric spine specimens. Changes in vertebral bone properties during the testing period may invalidate experimental results, but no data are available on degradation of bone during the testing period.

METHODS

Anterior oblique cancellous screws were inserted into human vertebral bodies from which the ventral cortex had been removed. The pullout strength was measured at 0, 24, 60, and 84 hours after insertion. The tests were performed on 48 human vertebral bodies, which were stored by freezing to -23 C, thawed for testing, and kept at room temperature during the testing time for as long as 84 hours.

RESULTS

The axial pullout strength showed no statistically significant change during 84 hours (P = 0.15). There were no significant differences attributable to vertebral level from T4 to L4, probably because the ventral cortices had been removed (P = 0.7).

CONCLUSIONS

During 3.5 days, there were no changes in pullout strength of vertebral cancellous bone. In biomechanical studies during a maximum period of 3 days with a small number of cadaveric spines (e.g., four spine specimen) the time-dependent changes in pullout strength play a less significant role than do the interspine differences. Interspine differences should be regarded as an important factor to be considered in the design of biomechanical tests.

Anterior vertebral body screw pullout testing. A comparison of Zeilke, Kaneda, Universal Spine System, and Universal Spine System with pullout-resistant nut

STUDY DESIGN

A biomechanical study of pullout of anteriorly implanted screws in cadaveric vertebral bodies.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate and compare the pullout strength of the Zielke, Kaneda, Universal Spine System (USS) pedicle screw, and USS pedicle screw with a new pullout-resistant nut.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

A common problem with anterior purchase regardless of the implant system is screw pullout at the proximal and distal ends of multilevel constructs. There is limited information on a solution to this problem.

METHODS

The L1 to L4 vertebral bodies from four cadavers had one each of Zielke and Kaneda pedicle screws (Acromed Corp., Cleveland, OH), USS pedicle screw (Synthes Spine, Paoli, PA), and USS pedicle screw with pullout-resistant nut implanted transversely across the center of the vertebral body with bicortical purchase in a similar fashion as would be used clinically. The screws were extracted using a servohydraulic material testing system. The maximum axial forces were recorded.

RESULTS

The Zielke and Kaneda screws had no significant difference in mean pullout strength (P = 0.542). The USS screw alone was less strong (P = 0.009). The USS screw and pullout-resistant nut increased the pullout strength by twofold (P = 0.00006). In the screw pullout tests, the mode of failure was at the screw thread's interface. The USS screw and pullout-resistant nut failed by imploding the body around the nut. With the USS screw and pullout-resistant nut, the pullout strength was determined by the compressive strength of the bone.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of a pullout-resistant nut to an anterior vertebral body screw improves the pullout strength by twofold and changes the mode of failure to rely ultimately on the inherent vertebral body strength rather than the screw's characteristics. The addition of a pullout-resistant nut may be applicable to multilevel implant constructs to prevent screw pullout at the top and bottom.