The high prevalence of severe early posttransplant renal allograft pathology in hepatitis C positive recipients

Liver and Kidney Recipient Selection of Hepatitis C Virus Viremic Donors: Meeting Consensus Report From the 2019 Controversies in Transplantation

The development of multiple highly effective and safe direct-acting antivirals to treat hepatitis C virus (HCV) has resulted in greater ease and confidence in managing HCV infection in transplant recipients that in turn has impacted the solid organ transplant community as well. In the United States, the opioid epidemic has increased the number of overdose deaths with a concomitant increase in younger HCV viremic donors after brain death being identified. At the same time, a decrease in HCV viremic transplant candidates has led to a growing interest in exploring the use of HCV viremic liver and kidney donor allografts in HCV-negative recipients. To date, experience with the use of HCV viremic liver and kidney allografts in HCV-negative recipients is limited to a few small prospective research trials, case series, and case reports. There are also limited data on recipient and donor selection for HCV viremic liver and kidney allografts. In response to this rapidly changing landscape in the United States, experts in the field of viral hepatitis and liver and kidney transplantation convened a meeting to review current data on liver and kidney recipient selection and developed consensus opinions related specifically to recipient and donor selection of HCV viremic liver and kidney allografts.

Transplanting hepatitis C virus-infected hearts into uninfected recipients: A single-arm trial

The advent of direct-acting antiviral therapy for hepatitis C virus (HCV) has generated tremendous interest in transplanting organs from HCV-infected donors. We conducted a single-arm trial of orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT) from HCV-infected donors into uninfected recipients, followed by elbasvir/grazoprevir treatment after recipient HCV was first detected (NCT03146741; sponsor: Merck). We enrolled OHT candidates aged 40-65 years; left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support and liver disease were exclusions. We accepted hearts from HCV-genotype 1 donors. From May 16, 2017 to May 10, 2018, 20 patients consented for screening and enrolled, and 10 (median age 52.5 years; 80% male) underwent OHT. The median wait from UNOS opt-in for HCV nucleic-acid-test (NAT)+ donor offers to OHT was 39 days (interquartile range [IQR] 17-57). The median donor age was 34 years (IQR 31-37). Initial recipient HCV RNA levels ranged from 25 IU/mL to 40 million IU/mL, but all 10 patients had rapid decline in HCV NAT after elbasvir/grazoprevir treatment. Nine recipients achieved sustained virologic response at 12 weeks (SVR-12). The 10th recipient had a positive cross-match, experienced antibody-mediated rejection and multi-organ failure, and died on day 79. No serious adverse events occurred from HCV transmission or treatment. These short-term results suggest that HCV-negative candidates transplanted with HCV-infected hearts have acceptable outcomes.

Early outcomes using hepatitis C-positive donors for cardiac transplantation in the era of effective direct-acting anti-viral therapies

BACKGROUND

Given the shortage of suitable donor hearts for cardiac transplantation, and the favorable safety and efficacy of current agents used to treat hepatitis C virus (HCV), our institution recently piloted transplantation of select patients using HCV-positive donors.

METHODS

Between September 2016 and March 2017, 12 HCV-naive patients and 1 patient with a history of treated HCV underwent heart transplantation (HT) using hearts from HCV-positive donors after informed consent. Patients who acquired HCV were referred to hepatology and treated with direct-acting anti-viral therapies (DAAs). Data collection and analysis were performed with institutional review board approval.

RESULTS

At the time of HT, mean age of recipients was 53 ± 10 years, and 8 patients (61.5%) were on left ventricular assist device support. After consent to consider an HCV-positive heart, mean time to HT was 11 ± 12 days. Nine of 13 patients (69%) developed HCV viremia after transplant, including 8 who completed DAA treatment and demonstrated cure, as defined by a sustained virologic response 12 weeks after treatment. One patient died during Week 7 of his treatment due to pulmonary embolism. DAAs were well tolerated in all treated patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In the era of highly effective DAAs, the use of HCV-positive donors represents a potential approach to safely expand the donor pool. Additional follow-up is needed to elucidate long-term outcomes.

The American Society of Transplantation Consensus Conference on the Use of Hepatitis C Viremic Donors in Solid Organ Transplantation

The availability of direct-acting antiviral agents for the treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection has resulted in a profound shift in the approach to the management of this infection. These changes have affected the practice of solid organ transplantation by altering the framework by which patients with end-stage organ disease are managed and receive organ transplants. The high level of safety and efficacy of these medications in patients with chronic HCV infection provides the opportunity to explore their use in the setting of transplanting organs from HCV-viremic patients into non-HCV-viremic recipients. Because these organs are frequently discarded and typically come from younger donors, this approach has the potential to save lives on the solid organ transplant waitlist. Therefore, an urgent need exists for prospective research protocols that study the risk versus benefit of using organs for hepatitis C-infected donors. In response to this rapidly changing practice and the need for scientific study and consensus, the American Society of Transplantation convened a meeting of experts to review current data and develop the framework for the study of using HCV viremic organs in solid organ transplantation.

The long-term outcomes of hepatitis C virus core antigen-positive Japanese renal allograft recipients

BACKGROUND

The impact of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections on patient long-term survival after renal transplants is unclear.

METHOD

To clarify the long-term outcomes of Japanese renal allograft recipients with HCV infections, we studied the cases of 187 patients (118 males and 69 females; 155 living donor cases, and 32 deceased donor cases; median follow-up period: 250 months) who underwent an initial renal transplant at Kanazawa Medical University from 1974 onwards.

RESULT

In this cohort, 35 patients (18.7%) were HCV core antigen (Ag)-positive, and 13 of them (37.1%) died (due to liver cirrhosis (4 cases), hepatocellular carcinoma (1 case), fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis due to HCV (1 case), and infections complicated with chronic hepatitis (6 cases)). However, only 14 of the 145 (9.7%) recipients died in the HCV-Ag/HCV antibody (Ab)-negative group. The Kaplan-Meier life table method indicated that the HCV-infected group exhibited significantly lower patient and death-censored allograft survival rates (log-rank test; patient survival: Chi-square: 11.2, p = 0.004; graft survival: Chi-square: 25.7, p < 0.001). The survival rate of the HCV-Ag-positive recipients decreased rapidly at 240 months after the renal transplant procedure. In addition, a Cox proportional hazards model indicated that positivity for the HCV-Ag was the most important independent risk factor for post-renal transplant survival and allograft function [survival: hazard ratio (HR) 3.93 (1.54-10.03), p = 0.004; graft function: HR 2.09 (1.14-3.81), p = 0.016].

CONCLUSION

HCV infection is a harmful risk factor for patient survival (especially at ≥20 years post-renal transplant) and renal allograft function in allograft recipients.

Hepatitis C and kidney disease: A narrative review

Hepatitis-C (HCV) infection can induce kidney injury, mostly due to formation of immune-complexes and cryoglobulins, and possibly to a direct cytopathic effect. It may cause acute kidney injury (AKI) as a part of systemic vasculitis, and augments the risk of AKI due to other etiologies. It is responsible for mesangiocapillary or membranous glomerulonephritis, and accelerates the progression of chronic kidney disease due to other causes. HCV infection increases cardiovascular and liver-related mortality in patients on regular dialysis. HCV-infected patients are at increased risk of acute post-transplant complications. Long-term graft survival is compromised by recurrent or de novo glomerulonephritis, or chronic transplant glomerulopathy. Patient survival is challenged by increased incidence of diabetes, sepsis, post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease, and liver failure. Effective and safe directly acting antiviral agents (DAAs) are currently available for treatment at different stages of kidney disease. However, the relative shortage of DAAs in countries where HCV is highly endemic imposes a need for treatment-prioritization, for which a scoring system is proposed in this review. It is concluded that the thoughtful use of DAAs, will result in a significant change in the epidemiology and clinical profiles of kidney disease, as well as improvement of dialysis and transplant outcomes, in endemic areas.

Hepatitis C virus infection in end-stage renal disease and kidney transplantation

Liver disease secondary to chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) on renal replacement therapy and after kidney transplantation (KT). Hemodialytic treatment (HD) for ESRD constitutes a risk factor for bloodborne infections because of prolonged vascular access and the potential for exposure to infected patients and contaminated equipment. Evaluation of HCV-positive/ESRD and HCV-positive/KT patients is warranted to determine the stage of disease and the appropriateness of antiviral therapy, despite such treatment is challenging especially due to tolerability issues. Antiviral treatment with interferon (IFN) is contraindicated after transplantation due to the risk of rejection, and therefore, treatment is recommended before KT. Newer treatment strategies of direct-acting antiviral agents in combination are revolutionizing HCV therapy, as a result of encouraging outcomes streaming from recent studies which report increased sustained viral response, low or no resistance, and good safety profiles, including preservation of renal function. KT has been demonstrated to yield better outcomes with respect to remaining on HD although survival after KT is penalized by the presence of HCV infection with respect to HCV-negative transplant recipients. Therefore, an appropriate, comprehensive, easily applicable set of clinical practice management guidelines is necessary in both ESRD and KT patients with HCV infection and HCV-related liver disease.

Acute transplant glomerulopathy with monocyte rich infiltrate

Acute transplant glomerulopathy refers to alloimmune mediated endothelial injury and glomerular inflammation that typically occurs early post-kidney transplantation. We report a case of a 48-year old woman with end stage renal disease from lupus nephritis who developed an unexplained rise in serum creatinine 2 months after renal transplant. As immunosuppression, she received alemtuzumab induction followed by a tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil and prednisone maintenance regimen. Her biopsy revealed severe glomerular endothelial injury associated with monocyte/macrophage-rich infiltrate in addition to mild acute tubulointerstitial cellular rejection. We briefly discuss acute transplant glomerulitis, its pathology and association with chronic/overt transplant glomerulopathy, C4d negative antibody-mediated rejection and the significance of monocytes in rejection. We also postulate that alemtuzumab induction may have contributed to the unusual pattern of monocyte-rich transplant glomerulitis.

Hepatitis C treatment in patients with kidney disease

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) remains the most common cause of liver damage in patients with kidney disease, including those on long-term dialysis. The natural history of HCV in patients on regular dialysis is not fully elucidated, but an adverse effect of HCV on survival has been noted; a novel meta-analysis of observational studies (14 studies including 145,608 unique patients) showed that the summary estimate for adjusted relative risk (all-cause mortality) was 1.35 with a 95% confidence interval of 1.25-1.47. The adjusted RR for liver disease-related death and cardiovascular mortality among maintenance dialysis patients was 3.82 (95% CI, 1.92-7.61) and 1.26 (95% CI, 1.10-1.45), respectively. It has been recommended that the decision to treat HCV in patients with chronic kidney disease be based on the potential benefits and risks of therapy, including life expectancy, candidacy for kidney transplant, and comorbidities. A pooled analysis including 494 dialysis patients on monotherapy with conventional interferon reported a summary estimate for sustained viral response and dropout rate of 39% (95% CI, 32-46) and 19% (95% CI, 13-26), respectively. All renal transplant candidates (dialysis dependent or not) with HCV should be assessed for antiviral treatment given the increased risk of progressive liver disease with immunosuppressive therapy, the increased life expectancy compared to other HCV-positive patients on dialysis, and the inability to receive interferon after transplant. Current guidelines support monotherapy with standard interferon in these patients, but modern antiviral approaches (that is, dual therapy with peg-IFN plus ribavirin) in a well-controlled setting may be an appropriate alternative.

Hepatitis C virus and nonliver solid organ transplantation

: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is common in solid organ allograft recipients and is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality after transplantation, so effective management will improve outcomes. In this review, we discuss the extent of the problem associated with HCV infection in donors and kidney, heart, and lung transplant candidates and recipients and recommend follow-up and treatment.Patients with end-stage kidney disease without cirrhosis and selected patients with early-stage cirrhosis can be considered for kidney transplant alone. In HCV-infected kidney allograft recipients, the progression of fibrosis should be evaluated serially by Fibroscan or serologic measures of fibrosis. Transplantation of kidneys from HCV-positive donors should be restricted to HCV-positive recipients as it is associated with a reduced time waiting for a graft and does not affect posttransplant outcomes. Hepatitis C virus antiviral therapy should be considered for all HCV-RNA-positive kidney transplant candidates, irrespective of the baseline liver histopathology. Protease inhibitors have yet to be fully evaluated in patients with renal dysfunction and in the transplant population. As these agents may cause anemia in patients with normal renal function, tolerability may be a problem in patients with end-stage kidney disease.The impact of HCV infection on survival in heart and lung transplantation is unclear. Because of the shortage of organs, few HCV-infected patients are accepted for transplantation.Universal use of nucleic acid amplification testing (NAT) for the screening of potential organ donors should be reserved to high-risk donors. Assays that quantify HCV core antigen may become more cost-effective than NAT for the screening of potential organ donors.

Harmful effects of viral replication in seropositive hepatitis C virus renal transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Seropositivity for hepatitis C virus (HCV) predicts lower patient and graft survival after renal transplantation (RT). However, the influence of viral replication at transplantation on long-term outcome remains to be determined.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study conducted in four Spanish hospitals, from 1997 to 2006. Data of all patients with RT, who displayed HCV+ (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay), and with negative viremia at RT (NEG group) were collected (n=41). For each NEG patient enrolled, data of two patients with RT nearest in time, HCV+, and positive viremia (POS group) were also collected (n=78).

RESULTS

The POS group showed a higher incidence of long-term liver disease (56.4% vs. 24.4%, P=0.0009) and episodes of transaminase elevation (38.5% vs. 7.3%, P=0.0003) and worse renal function (serum creatinine [sCr], 3.0 [2.7] vs. 1.9 [1.6] mg/dl, P=0.032; glomerular filtration rate, 43.7 [22.4] vs. 56.9 [27.9] ml/min, P=0.075). Noteworthy, 24.4% of NEG patients reactivated after RT, showing a worse patient survival (P=0.039). Active viral replication at RT and dialysis requirement in the first week remained as independent predictors of lower graft survival (death censored): hazards ratio, 3.11 (95% confidence interval, 1.34-7.19; P=0.009) and hazards ratio 3.13 (95% confidence interval, 1.53-6.37; P=0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that active viral replication at transplantation is an independent risk factor for graft failure in patients with positive serology for HCV.

Hepatitis C virus infection and dialysis: 2012 update

Hepatitis C virus infection is still common among dialysis patients, but the natural history of HCV in this group is not completely understood. Recent evidence has been accumulated showing that anti-HCV positive serologic status is significantly associated with lower survival in dialysis population; an increased risk of liver and cardiovascular disease-related mortality compared with anti-HCV negative subjects has been found. According to a novel meta-analysis (fourteen studies including 145,608 unique patients), the adjusted RR for liver disease-related death and cardiovascular mortality was 3.82 (95% CI, 1.92; 7.61) and 1.26 (95% CI, 1.10; 1.45), respectively. It has been suggested that the decision to treat HCV in patients with chronic kidney disease be based on the potential benefits and risks of therapy, including life expectancy, candidacy for kidney transplant, and co-morbidities. According to recent guidelines, the antiviral treatment of choice in HCV-infected patients on dialysis is mono-therapy but fresh data suggest the use of modern antiviral approaches (i.e., pegylated interferon plus ribavirin). The summary estimate for sustained viral response and drop-out rate was 56% (95% CI, 28-84) and 25% (95% CI, 10-40) in a pooled analysis including 151 dialysis patients on combination antiviral therapy (conventional or pegylated interferon plus ribavirin).

Picking transplant glomerulopathy out of the CAN: evidence from a clinico-pathological evaluation

Background

Since the term chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) was removed from the Banff scheme in 2005, transplant glomerulopathy (TG) has been regarded as a clinicopathological entity that is one of the major causes of graft loss. To assess the distinction between CAN and TG, we performed a comprehensive evaluation comparing TG with traditional CAN.

Methods

We compared the clinicopathological features of 43 cases of TG with 43 matched cases of non-TG CAN (non-TG group) after renal transplantation. TG was diagnosed by light microscopy based on the double contours of the glomerular basement membranes, and the Banff 97 classification system was used to score TG severity (cg0-3).

Results

Compared to the control group, we found a significantly higher incidence of positivity for human leukocyte antigen class-I and II antibodies, a higher incidence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, and poorer graft survival in TG patients. Clinically, TG was associated with a higher prevalence of proteinuria, hematuria, anaemia and hypoalbuminemia. Histologically, TG strongly correlated with antibody related microcirculatory injuries, including glomerulitis, peritubular capillaritis and peritubular capillary (PTC) C4d deposition. Interestingly, the TG patients showed a significantly higher incidence of IgA deposition than the control patients. C4d-positive TG was correlated with higher TG and PTC scores, and PTC C4d deposition was correlated with a more rapid progression to graft dysfunction. TG accompanied by HCV infection was associated with heavier proteinuria, higher TG and C4d scores, and poorer graft survival.

Conclusions

TG presents clinicopathological features that are distinct from non-TG cases and leads to poorer outcomes. PTC C4d deposition is related to a more rapid progression to graft loss, suggesting ongoing antibody reactivity. HCV-positive TG is a more severe sub-entity, that requires further investigation.

Hepatitis C and kidney transplantation

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is relatively common among patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) on dialysis and kidney transplant recipients. HCV infection in hemodialysis patients is associated with an increased mortality due to liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. The severity of hepatitis C-related liver disease in kidney transplant candidates may predict patient and graft survival after transplant. Liver biopsy remains the gold standard in the assessment of liver fibrosis in this setting. Kidney transplantation, not haemodialysis, seems to be the best treatment for HCV+ve patients with ESKD. Transplantation of kidneys from HCV+ve donors restricted to HCV+ve recipients is safe and associated with a reduction in the waiting time. Simultaneous kidney/liver transplantation (SKL) should be considered for kidney transplant candidates with HCV-related decompensated cirrhosis. Treatment of HCV is more complex in hemodialysis patients, whereas treatment of HCV recurrence in SLK recipients appears effective and safe.

Management of the kidney transplant patient with chronic hepatitis C infection

Chronic Hepatitis C (HCV) infection is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with end-stage renal disease. Renal transplantation confers a survival advantage in HCV-infected patients. Renal transplant candidates with serologic evidence of HCV infection should undergo a liver biopsy to assess for fibrosis and cirrhosis. Patients with Metavir fibrosis score ≤3 and compensated cirrhosis should be evaluated for interferon-based therapy. Achievement of sustained virological response (SVR) may reduce the risks for both posttransplantation hepatic and extrahepatic complications such as de novo or recurrent glomerulonephritis associated with HCV. Patients who cannot achieve SVR and have no live kidney donor may be considered for HCV-positive kidneys. Interferon should be avoided after kidney transplant except for treatment of life-threatening liver injury, such as fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis. Early detection, prevention, and treatment of complications due to chronic HCV infection may improve the outcomes of kidney transplant recipients with chronic HCV infection.

Hepatitis C infection and chronic renal diseases

More than 170 million people worldwide are chronically infected with the hepatitis C virus (HCV), which is responsible for over 1 million deaths resulting from cirrhosis and liver cancers. Extrahepatic manifestations are also relevant and include mixed cryoglobulinemia, lymphoproliferative disorders, and kidney disease. HCV infection is both a cause and a complication of chronic kidney disease, occurring largely in the context of mixed cryoglobulinemia. This infection also represents a major medical and epidemiologic challenge in patients with end-stage renal disease on renal replacement therapy with dialysis or transplantation. In these settings the presence of HCV correlates with higher rates of patient mortality than in HCV-negative subjects on dialysis or undergoing kidney transplant. The major concern is the lack of safe and effective drugs to treat HCV-infected patients with chronic kidney disease. Unfortunately, there are no large-scale clinical trials in this population, especially those receiving renal replacement therapy, so that strong evidence for treatment recommendations is scant. This review article provides the readers with the most recent insights on HCV infection both as cause and complication of chronic kidney disease, discusses pitfalls and limitations of current therapies, and reports on preliminary experience with novel therapeutic agents, as well as directions for future research.

Hepatitis C virus and kidney disease

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection remains frequent in patients on renal replacement therapy and has an adverse impact on survival in infected patients on chronic hemodialysis as well as renal transplant (RT) recipients. Nosocomial spread of HCV within dialysis units continues to occur. HCV is also implicated in the pathogenesis of renal dysfunction often mediated by cryoglobulins leading to chronic kidney disease as well as impairing renal allograft function. The role of antiviral therapy for hepatitis C in patients with renal failure remains unclear. Monotherapy with conventional interferon (IFN) for chronic hepatitis C is probably more effective in dialysis than in non-uraemic patients but tolerance is lower. Limited data only are available about monotherapy with pegylated interferon and combination therapy (pegylated IFN plus ribavirin) for chronic HCV in the dialysis population. Clinical experience with antiviral therapy for acute HCV in dialysis population is encouraging. Interferon remains contraindicated post-RT because of concerns about precipitating graft dysfunction. Sustained viral responses obtained by antiviral therapy in renal transplant candidates are durable after renal transplantation and may reduce HCV-related complications after RT (post-transplant diabetes mellitus, HCV-related glomerulonephritis, and chronic allograft nephropathy).

Treatment of dialysis patients with chronic hepatitis C using pegylated interferon and low-dose ribavirin

BACKGROUND

No safe and effective therapy exists for chronic hepatitis C in dialysis patients. Available data on the antiviral treatment of hepatitis C in dialysis population is mostly based on standard interferon monotherapy.

OBJECTIVES

We conducted a prospective, cohort trial with combined therapy (pegylated-interferonalpha-2a (135 mcg/week) plus low dose ribavirin (200 mg/day)) for chronic hepatitis C in 15 patients undergoing long-term dialysis. Twelve patients had HCV genotype 1a/1b, three were co-infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), and two had compensated cirrhosis. End-points were sustained viral response and adverse effects.

RESULTS

Sustained virological response was obtained in four patients (including two with HCV genotype 1); the SVR rate was 28.6% (4/14), on an intention-to-treat analysis. One subject with SVR had compensated cirrhosis. All HIV co-infected patients had well controlled HIV and one of them (33%) reached SVR. Seven (50%) of the 14 patients were non-responders, two of which relapsed after discontinuation of therapy. Drop-out rate was 71.4% (10/14). The most frequent side-effect was anemia, which required ribavirin discontinuation in three patients; seven (47%) patients received blood transfusions. Two patients died (week 4 and 14) of causes related to cardiovascular disease, which was frequent in our cohort. Two subjects were hospitalized and discontinued therapy (week 1, and 27).

CONCLUSIONS

Results from this study showed that about one-third of HD patients achieved sustained virological response with pegylated-interferon-alpha-2a plus low-dose ribavirin; however, tolerance to antiviral treatment was unsatisfactory. Well- controlled HIV infection should not be a contraindication to HCV therapy in dialysis patients. Prospective, controlled clinical trials of combined antiviral therapy targeted at HCV in chronic kidney disease population are indicated.

Antiviral therapy of hepatitis C in chronic kidney diseases: meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection remains frequent in patients with chronic kidney disease and the detrimental role of HCV on survival is well-established in this population. Several authors have reported on efficacy and safety of antiviral therapy for hepatitis C in this polulation but there is no clear consensus on management. To evaluate efficacy and safety of antiviral therapy for hepatitis C in patients with chronic kidney disease, we performed a systematic review of the published medical literature and completed a meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials. The primary outcome was sustained virological response (as a measure of efficacy); the secondary outcome was drop-out rate (as a measure of tolerability). We used the random effects model of Der Simonian and Laird, with heterogeneity and sensitivity analyses. We identified 13 studies including 539 unique patients; 10 (76.9%) concerned patients on maintenance dialysis. Only prospective, controlled clinical trials were included. Pooling of study results showed a significant increase of viral response in study (patients treated with antiviral therapy) than control patients (patients who did not receive therapy), the pooled odds ratio (OR) of failure to obtain a sustained viral response was 0.081 [95% confidence intervals (CI), 0.029-0.230], P = 0.0001. The pooled OR of drop-out rate was significantly increased in study vs control patients, OR = 0.389 (95% CI, 0.155-0.957), P = 0.04. The studies were heterogeneous with regard to viral response and drop-out rate. In the subset of clinical trials (n = 6) involving only dialysis patients receiving interferon (IFN) monotherapy for chronic HCV, there was a significant difference in the risk of failure to obtain a sustained viral response (study vs control patients), OR = 0.054 (95% CI, 0.019; 0.150), P = 0.0001 (random-effects model). No significant (NS) heterogeneity was found (Q = 14.604, P = 1.0). No difference in the drop-out rate between study and control patients was shown, OR = 0.920 (95% CI, 0.367; 2.311), NS. This result being homogeneous (Q = 3.639, P = 0.388). Our meta-analysis showed that the viral response was greater in patients with chronic kidney disease who received antiviral therapy than controls. No difference in the drop-out rate between study and control patients occurred in the subgroup of dialysis patients on IFN monotherapy. These results support IFN-based therapy for hepatitis C in patients on maintenance dialysis.

Hepatitis C infection in patients with chronic kidney disease

The management of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is complex and represents a particular concern since numerous issues, such as antiviral therapy in dialysis patients and post renal transplant, and prevention of HCV spread within dialysis units, remain unresolved. An enormous body of literature has been published on HCV in the CKD population; however, clinical evidence on important issues is mostly based on uncontrolled clinical trials or retrospective surveys. The aim of this paper is to provide a systematic review of the literature. Responses to the critical issues have been developed by a consensus of experts, endorsed by the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver (AISF) and some clinical recommendations have been added.

Hepatitis C virus infection and the dialysis patient

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) remains common in patients undergoing regular dialysis and is an important cause of liver disease in this population both during dialysis and after renal transplantation (RT). Anti-HCV screening of blood products has almost eliminated posttransfusion HCV infection but acquisition of HCV continues to occur in dialysis patients because of nosocomial spread. The natural history of HCV in dialysis population is not completely understood though recent data show that HCV infection has a detrimental role on survival of chronic dialysis patients. Several clinical trials have suggested that the response rate to conventional interferon (IFN) is higher in dialysis patients than those with normal kidney function but tolerance is lower. There are only limited data about pegylated IFN alone or in association with ribavirin for hepatitis C in dialysis population. IFN remains contraindicated post-RT because of concern about precipitating graft dysfunction; however, preliminary evidence shows the durability of sustained response to antiviral therapy pre-RT after renal transplant. Successful pretransplant therapy is associated with several benefits after RT including reduced incidence of posttransplant diabetes mellitus and de novo glomerulonephritis in HCV-infected recipients.

Transplant glomerulopathy: subclinical incidence and association with alloantibody

Transplant glomerulopathy (TG) usually has been described as part of a constellation of late chronic histologic abnormalities associated with proteinuria and declining function. The current study used both protocol and clinically-indicated biopsies to investigate clinical and subclinical TG, their prognosis and possible association with alloantibody. We retrospectively studied 582 renal transplants with a negative pre-transplant T-cell complement dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch. TG was diagnosed in 55 patients, 27 (49%) based on protocol biopsy in well-functioning grafts. The cumulative incidence of TG increased over time to 20% at 5 years. The prognosis of subclinical TG was equally as poor as TG diagnosed with graft dysfunction, with progressive worsening of histopathologic changes and function. Although TG was associated with both acute and chronic histologic abnormalities, 14.5% of TG biopsies showed no interstitial fibrosis or tubular atrophy, while 58% (7/12) of biopsies with severe TG showed only minimal abnormalities. TG was associated with acute rejection, pretransplant hepatitis C antibody positivity and anti-HLA antibodies (especially anti-Class II), with the risk increasing if the antibodies were donor specific. We suggest that subclinical TG is an under-recognized cause of antibody-mediated, chronic renal allograft injury which may be mechanistically distinct from other causes of nephropathy.

Influence of pretransplant IFN-alpha therapy on interstitial fibrosis in renal allografts with hepatitis C virus infection

The aim of this study is to identify the influence of chronic HCV infection on development of interstitial fibrosis (IF) in renal allografts and evaluate if pretransplant interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha) therapy has an effect on IF. The development of IF and graft outcome were compared between anti-HCV positive (n = 28) and anti-HCV negative (n = 30) recipients. The influence of IFN-alpha therapy on IF and graft survival was compared between anti-HCV positive recipients who received pre-transplant IFN-alpha therapy (n = 15, group 1) and anti-HCV positive recipients who did not receive IFN-alpha therapy (n = 13, group 2). Recipients with anti-HCV antibodies had higher incidences of IF and shorter graft survival than did recipients without anti-HCV antibodies (p < 0.05 for both). Development of IF was higher in group 2 recipients, and patients in group 1 had longer graft survivals (p < 0.05 for both). Patients with positive HCV-RNA had higher grades of tubular TGF-beta1 expression than did patients with negative HCV-RNA (p < 0.05). Expression of tubular TGF-beta1 was lower in group 1 patients when compared with group 2 patients (p < 0.001). In conclusion, we suggested that HCV infection may have a triggering effect on the development of IF in renal allografts by augmenting renal expression of TGF-beta1.

De novo glomerulonephritis in renal allografts with hepatitis C virus infection

The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection on the occurrence of posttransplant de novo glomerulonephritis (GN). Of 165 patients selected for the study, 44 were HCV positive and 121 HCV negative. Light and immunofluorescence microscopy were performed on all biopsies and clinical and laboratory findings reviewed. Fifteen (34%) of the 44 HCV positive patients showed de novo GN (4 membranous, 11 membranoproliferative) at a mean of 47 +/- 22 months. But only 8 (6.6%) of 121 HCV negative patients showed de novo GN (5 anti-glomerular basement membrane nephritis in recipients with Alport's disease, 2 membranous GN, 1 membranoproliferative GN) at a mean of 60 +/- 39 months. The risk of development of de novo GN was higher among patients with HCV infection (P < .001). The presence of de novo GN in HCV positive patients impaired graft survival compared with HCV positive patients without de novo GN (P < .01). The incidence of recurrence of primary disease, mainly focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, membranous glomerulonephritis, membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis, and IgA nephropathy, was higher in HCV negative patients (29%) compared with HCV positive patients (6.8%; P = .001), namely, 50%, 57.6%, 25%, and 69%, respectively. In conclusion, HCV infection showed a strong influence on the development of de novo GN. For this reason, it is important to follow HCV positive recipients with a renal biopsy even when there are no significant clinical or laboratory findings.

Effect of chronic viral hepatitis on graft survival in Saudi renal transplant patients

BACKGROUND

In Saudi Arabia the prevalence of hepatitis C among hemodialysis patients is very high ranging from 60 to 80%. A large number of these dialysis patients go for renal transplant, resulting into a higher prevalence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in renal transplant patients. Yet no current systematic report is available on the influence of hepatitis C status on patient and graft survival. The present study was therefore undertaken to address this objective.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of data of 448 renal transplantation subjects was undertaken. The mean follow-up period was 5.85 +/- 2.7 (median 5.3) years. The factors associated with renal graft survival were reviewed and these include: age, sex, and type of donor, immunosuppressive medication, episodes of infection, blood pressure, serum creatinine, and status of hepatitis. The primary end-points were renal graft function and patient survival. Logistic regression, COX regression analysis, and Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were used to evaluate the influence of hepatitis C on the above parameters.

RESULTS

Among 448 recipients of first kidney transplant patients, 286 (63.8%) were positive for HCV infection. In the HCV-positive group, 204 (71.32%) were males. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed a significantly better graft survival for HCV-negative patients than HCV-positive patients (p < 0.001; log-rank test). Logistic regression analysis and COX regression analysis have shown different grades of graft dysfunction were present in HCV-positive patients after adjustment for covariates: age, sex, blood pressure, type of donor, and immunosuppressive medication; the presence of HCV was a major predictor of bad outcome and significantly influenced graft survival (odds ratio = 4.37; 95% Cl = 1.81-4.77). Significant deterioration of liver function was noted in HCV-positive patients at the last follow-up, taking ALT as a marker (ALT level 80.6 +/- 5.8 U/l at the last follow-up versus 49.5 +/- 32 U/l at baseline p < or = 0.0001). Sixteen patients had a chronic active course and 1 patient developed biopsy-proven liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension. A serious and significantly greater incidence of fatal chest infections was seen in HCV-positive patients. Although mortality was greater in HCV-positive versus HCV-negative patients (20 vs. 7), the difference did not attain statistical significance (p = 0.23) and none of the patients died as a result of hepatic failure.

CONCLUSION

The presence of HCV infection greatly influenced graft survival in renal transplant patients and a higher proportion of infected patients had renal and hepatic dysfunction. A significant increase in fatal chest infections was noted in HCV-positive patients. Overall mortality was higher in HCV-positive patients, but it was not statistically significant. All measures should be taken to prevent HCV transmission in the dialysis population. Renal transplant recipients with HCV infection need close monitoring for both graft and liver function.

Amantadine therapy in renal transplant patients with hepatitis C virus infection

BACKGROUND

To date, there is no safe and efficient treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection after renal transplantation. Recently, there were encouraging reports after using amantadine in HCV-positive immunocompetent patients.

OBJECTIVES

In an open pilot study, we evaluated the efficacy and the safety of amantadine monotherapy in 8 HCV positive renal-transplant patients with chronic active hepatitis and increased alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels.

RESULTS

After 6 months of amantadine therapy (200 mg per day), there were no decrease in HCV viremia (5.87 +/- 0.37 log copies/ml at M6 versus 5.71 +/- 0.5 log copies/ml at baseline; P > 0.05). However, we found a significant decrease in ALT activity (71 +/- 17 IU/l at M6 versus 100 +/- 9 IU/l at baseline; P = 0.04), whereas the decrease in aspartate aminotransferase activity did not reach statistical significance. There were no significant changes in liver histology. The clinical and biological tolerance was very good. Finally, there were a significant decrease in cyclosporine A whole blood trough levels during therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study is the first one to demonstrate that amantadine monotherapy lack of efficacy in HCV renal-transplant patients. It is able to improve liver enzymes but it has no impact neither upon HCV viremia nor upon liver histology.

Ribavirin pharmacokinetics in renal and liver transplant patients: evidence that it depends on renal function

BACKGROUND

Ribavirin is approved for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. However, no recommendation exists for dosing patients with impaired renal function.

METHODS

The authors performed a pharmacokinetic study in 21 HCV-positive renal or liver transplant patients. The mean creatinine clearance (ClCr) calculated by the Cockcroft-Gault equation was 57 mL/min (0.95 mL/s; range, 17 to 89 mL/min [0.28 to 1.48 mL/s]). Twelve blood samples were obtained during a 96-hour period after the first single administration of 1,000 mg of ribavirin. After the first pharmacokinetics (PK) and the pharmacodynamics (PD) profile was completed, the patients received ribavirin at 1,000 mg/d with or without interferon-alpha. A blood sample was taken monthly just before the oral administration of ribavirin. Plasma ribavirin concentrations were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography.

RESULTS

A total of 428 plasma concentrations were analyzed by a population pharmacokinetic method using the NONlinear Mixed Effect Model program. The mean observed ribavirin apparent clearance (CL/F) was 9.1 L/h (with an interindividual variability of 39%). The influences of the age, sex, body weight (BW), serum creatinine (Scr), ClCr, hemoglobin, and graft status on CL/F were examined. CL/F was highly correlated with ClCr (r = 0.63, P < 0.01). The final regression formula was CL/F (L/h) = 32.3 x BW x (1 - 0.0094 x age) x (1 - 0.42 x sex)/Scr, where sex = 0 for men and 1 for women; Scr is in micromoles per liter. Sex had a larger influence on CL/F than that corresponding to the Cockcroft-Gault equation (ie, 15%).

CONCLUSION

The authors present the parameters that determine ribavirin clearance in HCV+ transplant patients with normal or impaired renal function. Moreover, we suggest ribavirin daily doses according to various levels of renal function.

Evidence that clearance of hepatitis C virus RNA after alpha-interferon therapy in dialysis patients is sustained after renal transplantation

To date, there is no available treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection after renal transplantation (RT). Among 55 anti-HCV-positive/HCV RNA-positive hemodialysis patients who were treated with IFN-alpha (9 MU/wk during 6 or 12 mo), 21 of them (38%) had a sustained virologic response. Of these, 16 (76%) underwent RT 38 mo (range, 2 to 57 mo) after alpha-IFN therapy. There were 13 men and 3 women aged 46 yr (range, 27 to 68 yr). At RT, HCV serology was still positive in 15 patients, and HCV viremia was negative in all patients. Immunosuppression relied on anticalcineurin agents with or without steroids and/or antimetabolites; in addition, 12 of them received induction therapy with antithymocyte globulins. At the last follow-up after RT, at 22.5 mo (range, 2 to 88 mo), HCV viremia remained negative in all patients. Moreover, HCV RNA was not present in peripheral blood mononuclear cells when assessed in eight patients. HCV serology was found to be still positive in 13 patients. Three patients presented with acute rejection, one presented with a suppurative lymphocele, one died from a sepsis, and four presented with a cytomegalovirus infection. None of them developed posttransplant diabetes mellitus. In conclusion, hemodialysis patients waiting for a RT need to be treated with alpha-IFN because when HCV RNA clearance occurred, they experienced no relapse after transplantation despite chronic immunosuppressive treatment.

Long-term ribavirin therapy in hepatitis C virus-positive renal transplant patients: effects on renal function and liver histology

BACKGROUND

Long-term renal transplant (RT) recipient mortality and graft loss increase significantly in hepatitis C virus positive (HCV-[+]ve) patients. Treatment with alpha-interferon in this population is associated with a high rate of acute rejection. The aims of this study were the evaluation of the efficacy and the safety of ribavirin monotherapy in 16 HCV-(+) RT patients (group A) matched to 32 HCV-(+) RT patients (group B) who did not receive ribavirin.

METHODS

Ribavirin was started at a daily dose of 1,000 mg and then adapted to hemoglobin level. The study was scheduled for 1 year.

RESULTS

Ribavirin monotherapy was associated with a decrease in liver enzymes and serum creatinine levels. When proteinuria was present, this decreased or disappeared. There were no significant changes in HCV viremia. There was a significant progression in liver fibrosis with no improvement in inflammation scores. Hemoglobin levels fall dramatically, despite an important support by recombinant erythropoeitin (median, 20,000 IU/wk). In 3 cases, ribavirin therapy had to be stopped. In the control group, after 1 year of follow-up, there was a significant increase in serum alanine aminotransferase and creatinine values. Proteinuria decreased in only 2 of 12 patients (P = 0.03 as compared with group A).

CONCLUSION

One year of ribavirin monotherapy seems to have, at best, no beneficial effect on liver histology, although it improves liver enzyme levels. Despite its efficiency to dramatically decrease proteinuria, its impact on renal function remains unknown.

Chronic liver disease in kidney recipients with hepatitis C virus infection

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV) positive test is higher among patients in dialysis and in kidney recipients than in general population. Hepatitis C virus infection is the main cause of chronic liver disease in renal transplant patients. Liver biopsy and virological analysis were performed to clarify the grade of liver damage in kidney recipients.

METHODS

Renal recipients patients with at least 5 yr under immunosuppression were submitted to clinical and laboratory analysis. Patients who tested anti-HCV positive were candidates to liver biopsy with no regard to transaminase levels.

RESULTS

Forty-five patients tested anti-HCV positive and 42 anti-HCV negative. Twenty-six anti-HCV and RNA-HCV positive patients were submitted to liver biopsy. Seventy-three percentage of these patients presented chronic active hepatitis, from these only one patient presented cirrhosis. Only 29% of the anti-HCV positive group presented elevated alanine aminotransferase levels. Anti-HCV positive patients presented longer previous time on dialysis and less rejection episodes than the group anti-HCV negative (p < 0.05). All anti-HCV positive patients but one tested RNA-HCV positive by polymerase chain reaction (PCR).

CONCLUSIONS

In this series the prevalence of anti-HCV positive is 51.7%. Most of the patients presented liver damage in histology caused by HCV. However, we found only mild or minimal fibrosis and inflammatory activity grade, despite 10 yr of HCV infection and 5 yr of immunosuppressive treatment. Only one patient presented cirrhosis (4%). Performing serial liver biopsies in a long-term follow-up is needed to clarify the impact of HCV infection in renal transplant patients.

Pretransplant evaluation of renal transplant candidates

Kidney transplantation should be strongly considered for all medically suitable patients with chronic and end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Improvements in outcomes after renal transplantation have resulted in a more liberal selection of patients. High-risk category patients including human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive, highly sensitized patients, T-cell positive cross-match, and ABO blood group-incompatible patients are now considered potential renal transplant candidates. Unfortunately, the demand for kidney transplants far exceeds the supply of available organs, causing a persistent increase in the number of patients on the waiting list with a parallel increase in the waiting time for a cadaveric kidney transplant. This has 2 major consequences. First, patients on the waiting list are getting sicker and older. Second, living donors have assumed increasing importance in renal transplantation. Pre-existing morbidities including malignancies, cardiovascular disease, infections, and coagulopathies should be extensively evaluated before proceeding to transplantation. Special attention should be given to cardiovascular risk factors because the leading cause of death after renal transplant is cardiovascular disease. A full immunologic evaluation with ABO blood group determination, human leukocyte antigen (HLA) typing, screening for antibody to HLA phenotypes, and cross-matching need to be gathered before transplantation to avoid antibody-mediated hyperacute rejection or to proceed with specific protocols in highly sensitized or in positive T-cell cross-match patients. With the increased rate of donation from living donors, regular follow-up evaluation of kidney donors is recommended to detect hypertension or proteinuria in those who may develop it.

Hepatitis C virus infection and de novo glomerular lesions in renal allografts

In the present study we examine whether hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection status influences glomerular pathologic findings in renal allografts and its effect on graft outcome. Renal allograft biopsies performed between January 1991 and June 1999 were considered. Exclusion criteria were insufficient sample, unknown HCV serological status at time of biopsy and final diagnosis of acute rejection. Light microscopy and immunofluorescence studies were performed on all biopsies. According to a predefined protocol, electron microscopy was carried out. Of 138 eligible renal allograft biopsies, 42 fulfilled at least one exclusion criterion. Of 96 biopsies selected for the study, 44 (45.8%) were from HCV-positive and 52 from HCV-negative recipients. Renal biopsy was performed 74 +/- 55 and 60 +/- 39 months after transplantation in HCV-positive and HCV-negative groups, respectively (p = 0.12). Of 44 HCV-positive biopsies, 20 (45.4%) showed membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis (MPGN) (16 type I and 4 type III). Conversely, in HCV-negative biopsies there were only three cases of MPGN (2 type I and 1 type III). De novo membranous GN (MGN) was diagnosed in 8/44 (18.2%) HCV-positive and in 4/52 (7.7%) HCV-negative cases. The prevalence of chronic transplant glomerulopathy was similar in HCV-positive and HCV-negative groups (11.4% and 11.5%, respectively). The prognosis of de novo GN (either MPGN or MGN) was worse in HCV-positive than in HCV-negative recipients (relative risk 4.89; 95% confidence interval, 1.15-20.69; p = 0.03). By multivariate analysis, HCV-positive serology infection was the only independent predictor of graft loss (relative risk 2.64; 95% confidence interval, 1.35-5.17; p = 0.005). In diagnostic renal allograft biopsies the presence of de novo immune-mediated glomerulonephritis, especially type I MPGN, is strongly associated with HCV infection and results in accelerated loss of the graft.

[Predialysis kidney transplantation]

<zakljucak> Predijalizna transplantacija bubrega je sa medicinskog i socioekonomskog aspekta metoda izbora u lecenju terminalne bubrezne insuficijencije kod bolesnika koji imaju zivog davaoca bubrega. Nase pocetno iskustvo sa ovom metodom lecenja vrlo je afirmativno. Predijalizna transplantacija bubrega je posebno prihvatljiva kod dece, dijabeticara i bolesnika sa losim pristupom za dijalizu. U nasoj zemlji postoje dodatni medicinski (los kvalitet dijalize, visok rizik od infekcije virusima hepatitisa, visok rizik od senzibilizacije na tkivne antigene transfuzijama krvi) i paramedicinski razlozi (prepunjenost dijaliznih centara, ograniceni zdravstveni ekonomski resursi) koji namecu potrebu daljeg razvijanja programa predijalizne transplantacije.

Hepatitis C virus infection and renal transplantation

With the success of organ transplantation, liver disease has emerged as an important cause of morbidity and mortality of renal transplant (RT) recipients. Numerous studies performed during the 1990s have shown that hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is the leading cause of chronic liver disease among RT recipients. The transmission of HCV by renal transplantation of a kidney from an HCV-infected organ donor has been shown unequivocally. Liver biopsy is essential in the evaluation of liver disease of RT recipients, and histological studies have shown that HCV-related liver disease after renal transplantation is progressive. The outcome of HCV-related liver disease is probably more aggressive in RT recipients than immunocompetent individuals. Various factors can affect the progression of HCV in the RT population: coinfection with hepatitis B virus, time of HCV acquisition, type of immunosuppressive treatment, and concomitant alcohol abuse. The role of virological features of HCV remains unclear. The natural history of HCV infection after renal transplantation is under evaluation; however, recent surveys with long follow-ups have documented adverse effects of HCV infection on patient and graft survival in RT recipients. Use of renal grafts from HCV-infected donors in recipients with HCV infection does not appear to result in a greater burden of liver disease, at least for a short period. The association between HCV and de novo or recurrent glomerulonephritis after RT has been hypothesized and is an area of avid research. Reported studies do not support interferon (IFN) treatment for RT recipients with chronic hepatitis C because of the frequent occurrence of graft failure, and information on the use of other types of IFN or combined therapy (IFN plus ribavirin or amantadine) is not yet available in the RT population.