Prediction and diagnosis of cytomegalovirus disease in renal transplant recipients using qualitative and quantitative polymerase chain reaction

Molecular Detection and Glycoprotein B (UL55) Genotyping of Cytomegalovirus among Sudanese Renal Transplant Recipients

Background

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is the most common opportunistic pathogen among renal transplants with significant morbidity and mortality. This study was designed to detect CMV DNA and to determine the frequency of different glycoprotein B (UL55) genotypes among Sudanese renal transplant recipients.

Methods

One hundred and four renal transplant recipients were included in this study. A blood specimen was collected from each recipient. DNA was extracted from plasma using the QIAamp DNA mini kit. CMV amplification and quantification were performed using CMV Real-RT Quant kits. Genotyping of human CMV gB was carried out by nested PCR and sequencing of the highly diverse region of gB.

Results

CMV DNA was detected in 40/104 (38.5%) of renal transplant recipients. The average of the CMV DNA viral load was 358 × 10⁴ copies/ml (6.5 log₁₀) ranging from 62 copies/ml (1.8 log₁₀) to 1.43 × 10⁸ copies/ml (9 log₁₀). CMV viremia was detected in 60% of recipients of less than 1–12 months, 17% of 13–24, 10% of 25–36, 5% of 37–48, and 8% in more than 48 months posttransplantation with no association (p = 0.296) between CMV viremia and postrenal transplantation time. The association between the type of immunosuppressive drugs and high viral loads (>1000 copies/ml) showed a significant difference (p = 0.05). The association between CMV loads of >1000 copies/ml and symptoms of CMV disease was highly significant (p ≤ 0.001). Fever 7 (41%), fever and leucopenia 6 (35%), and gastrointestinal disease 4 (24%) were the most common symptoms of CMV disease. CMV genotyping revealed 8 cases (80%) for gB3 and 2 cases (20%) for gB4 genotypes. The most frequent genotype among Sudanese renal transplant recipients was gB3.

Conclusions

The frequency of CMV DNA is high among Sudanese renal transplant recipients. CMV gB3 is the most predominant glycoprotein B genotype in Sudanese renal transplant recipients.

Progress and Challenges in the Prevention, Diagnosis, and Management of Cytomegalovirus Infection in Transplantation

Hosts with compromised or naive immune systems, such as individuals living with HIV/AIDS, transplant recipients, and fetuses, are at the highest risk for complications from cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection. Despite substantial progress in prevention, diagnostics, and treatment, CMV continues to negatively impact both solid-organ transplant (SOT) and hematologic cell transplant (HCT) recipients. In this article, we summarize important developments in the field over the past 10 years and highlight new approaches and remaining challenges to the optimal control of CMV infection and disease in transplant settings.

Use of Viral Load as a Surrogate Marker in Clinical Studies of Cytomegalovirus in Solid Organ Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Symptomatic cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease has been the standard endpoint for clinical trials in organ transplant recipients. Viral load may be a more relevant endpoint due to low frequency of disease. We performed a meta-analysis and systematic review of the literature. We found several lines of evidence to support the validity of viral load as an appropriate surrogate end-point, including the following: (1) viral loads in CMV disease are significantly greater than in asymptomatic viremia (odds ratio, 9.3 95% confidence interval, 4.6-19.3); (2) kinetics of viral replication are strongly associated with progression to disease; (3) pooled incidence of CMV viremia and disease is significantly lower during prophylaxis compared with the full patient follow-up period (viremia incidence: 3.2% vs 34.3%; P < .001) (disease incidence: 1.1% vs 13.0%; P < .001); (4) treatment of viremia prevented disease; and (5) viral load decline correlated with symptom resolution. Based on the analysis, we conclude that CMV load is an appropriate surrogate endpoint for CMV trials in organ transplant recipients.

Cutaneous ulcer as leading symptom of systemic cytomegalovirus infection

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection rarely manifests with skin ulcerations. We describe a case report of a 64-year-old woman with chronic immunosuppression for treatment of mixed connective tissue disease, presenting with new onset leg ulcerations after a recent change in immunosuppressive regimen. She subsequently developed fulminant hepatitis, encephalopathy, and pancytopenia and was found to have severe systemic CMV viremia. Skin ulcer biopsy was positive by immunohistochemical staining for CMV infected endothelial cells. Both systemic disease and skin ulcer rapidly improved after stopping immunosuppression and administering intravenous ganciclovir. New onset skin ulcers in an immunosuppressed individual, especially with recent changes in immunosuppressive regimen, should raise the suspicion of reactivation of CMV.

Can skin be the first site of CMV involvement preceding a systematic infection in a renal transplant recipient?

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is an important and well-described opportunistic virus in renal transplant recipients (RTRs) with infection occurring mainly after the first month post-renal transplant. CMV can present as primary infection, reinfection or reactivation of latent disease. Skin manifestations are rare and variable, and diagnosis is often delayed. We present one case of skin CMV ulcer of perineal areas without systemic symptoms of CMV disease and a negative quantitative polymerase chain reaction. This case serves to illustrate the protean nature of CMV disease in RTR.

Multicentric evaluation of a new commercial cytomegalovirus real-time PCR quantitation assay

Automated real-time PCR systems have become the most common method in the quantitation of viral load during cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in immuno-compromised patients. In order to evaluate a new commercially available CMV real-time PCR assay (CMV R-gene, Argene, France), a pp65 antigenemia assay and four different "in-house" real-time PCR assays were compared to the CMV R-gene for the detection and the quantitation of CMV load in 506 specimens of whole blood from transplant patients in four French hospital laboratories. The CMV R-gene was more sensitive than the pp65 antigenemia: there were 18% antigenemia-negative versus CMV R-gene-positive samples. A significant correlation was found between DNA quantitation by CMV R-gene and the number of positive cells detected by the pp65 antigenemia test (Spearman's rank test, r=0.63, p<0.0001). A CMV DNA load equivalent to 50 pp65-positive cells/200000 polymorphonuclear leukocytes was 5.26log(10)copies/mL of whole blood. When the CMV R-gene kit was compared to the four other "in-house" real-time PCR assays, there were few discordant results (6.7% total for the four laboratories), all detected with a weak positive CMV DNA viral load. Spearman's coefficients showed a good (r=0.82 for laboratory 1, r=0.66 for laboratory 3) to excellent (r=0.99 for laboratory 2, r=0.94 for laboratory 4) correlation between CMV R-gene and the four real-time "in-house" PCR assays. However, the results of CMV DNA viral load generated by CMV R-gene test were constantly higher than those generated by three out of four "in-house" PCR assays. This mean variation in CMV DNA viral load measured by CMV R-gene and "in-house" PCRs was of 0.77log(10), 0.04log(10), 0.77log(10) and 0.97log(10), for laboratories 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively. We concluded that there was variability between results of different real-time PCR assays for CMV DNA quantitation. This observation emphasized the need of a standardised commercial assay to allow an "inter-laboratory" comparison of results. Our study showed that CMV R-gene is an accurate, efficient, reliable and versatile tool for rapid diagnosis and monitoring of CMV disease in transplantation recipients.

The use of consensus guidelines for management of cytomegalovirus infection in renal transplantation

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection imposes a significant economic burden on susceptible patients after renal transplantation. Our study was conducted to determine the prediction, probability, consequences, and treatment costs of CMV infection under Canadian consensus guidelines in 270 sequential transplant patients. Transplant patients from donors positive (D(+)) for CMV into recipients negative (R(-)) for CMV received antiviral prophylaxis for 14 weeks and all but donor negative (D(-))/R(-) patients were monitored weekly for the CMVpp65 marker expression. Marker-positive patients and patients with CMV infection or disease received antiviral treatment. Within the first 6 months, 27% of the 270 patients tested had incidences of asymptomatic CMV infection, while 9% had CMV syndrome or disease. Only 1% of patients had infection after 6 months. The CMVpp65 marker levels were significantly greater in patients with syndrome or disease; but post-test probabilities and predictive value of the marker assay were low. Mean direct costs for care were $2256 and ranged from $927 for D(-)/R(-) patients to $7069 in the D(+)/R(-) patients. Extension of antiviral prophylaxis to D(+) or D(+)/R(+) patients significantly increased the estimated mean costs for an absolute reduction to 4% in CMV syndrome or disease. Our studies show that current guidelines for treatment enable effective control of CMV infection; however, alternative strategies have different economic impact.

Quantitation of cytomegalovirus DNA by real-time polymerase chain reaction in peripheral blood specimens of patients with solid organ transplants: Comparison with end-point PCR and pp65 antigen test

The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNA quantitation provides sensitive and specific data for detecting CMV as well as monitoring the infection and determining the appropriate antiviral strategy. A recently introduced real-time PCR assay for CMV DNA quantitation was applied on 158 peripheral blood leukocytes (PBLs) from 32 liver-transplanted patients with CMV asymptomatic infection and correlated with a commercial quantitative end-point PCR (COBAS AMPLICOR CMV Monitor) and CMV pp65 antigenemia. A good correlation was found between real-time PCR and pp65 antigen test (r2 = 0.691) and the two PCR assays (r2 = 0.761). Real-time PCR data were higher in pre-emptive treated patients (>20 pp65 + positive cells, median CMV DNA value: 3.8 log(10) copies/500,000 PBLs) than in not-treated ones (2.9 logs). According to pp65 levels of 0, 1-10, 11-20, 21-50, 51-100, and >100 positive cells/200,000 PBLs, median CMV DNA by real-time PCR was 2.6, 3.0, 3.6, 4.0, 4.2, and 4.8 logs, respectively, (CMV DNA levels by COBAS AMPLICOR: 2.8, 2.9, 3.8, 3.7, 3.9, and 4.0 logs). For samples with >20 pp65 + cells, real-time PCR gave significantly higher values than in groups with <20 pp65 + cells, whereas the COBAS AMPLICOR results showed a slower progression rate. Dilutions of CMV AD169 strain were used to probe real-time PCR reproducibility (between and intra-assay variability <2%) and sensitivity (100% detection rate at 10 copies/reaction, 28.5% with end-point PCR). In conclusion, real-time PCR significantly improves the study of CMV DNA dynamics due to a more reliable quantitation of CMV DNA for moderate and high DNA level compared to end-point PCR with better sensitivity and specificity. Real-time PCR provides more precise information for evaluating infection progress and assessing antiviral response, simplifying and accelerating the process of producing a reliable quantitation of CMV DNA for clinical purposes.

A follow up study of cytomegalovirus infection in a group of Turkish renal transplant recipients using molecular assays

The clinical value of an in-house cytomegalovirus nested polymerase chain reaction (CMV-PCR) and a commercial molecular assay hybrid capture CMV DNA assay (HCA) was evaluated in monitoring a group of renal transplant patients for six months follow up. In this study, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of nested CMV DNA PCR assay and HCA at the beginning of the study were 70, 42.9, 46.7, 66.7, and 60, 78.6, 66.7, and 73.3% respectively. After six months, they were 80, 66.7, 80, 66.7 for CMV PCR and 73.3, 88.9, 91.7, 66.7% for HCA respectively. These results indicate that in monitoring and predicting CMV infections in renal transplant recipients, not only qualitative but also quantitative assays must be used together in order to decide the preemptive strategies.

Follow-up of 28 HCMV seropositive renal-transplant recipients: comparison of clinical, biological and virological parameters in the groups of treated versus untreated infected patients

BACKGROUND

A pre-emptive strategy for prevention of Human Cytomegalovirus (HCMV) disease depends on accurate detection of HCMV infection and clinical and/or biological abnormalities.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of our study was to evaluate a therapeutic strategy based on the presence of either minimal clinical and/or biological symptoms or high HCMV viral load assessed by quantitative real-time PCR from whole blood as previously described.

STUDY DESIGN

Between June 2002 and July 2003, 70 HCMV seropositive patients underwent a renal transplantation. Virological monitoring was performed every 2 weeks until day 90 then every 3-4 weeks until day 180. Biochemical and haematological parameters were also prospectively monitored.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients (40%) showed at least one positive HCMV DNA in whole blood. Based on the following criteria: HCMV viral load greater than 4log(10)/ml, or the persistence of a HCMV DNAemia in two consecutive blood samples, or fever, or leucopenia or neutropenia, or increase in alanine aminotransferase level, 14 of the 28 patients received IV ganciclovir as a pre-emptive treatment. Immunosuppressive therapy and demographical data were comparable in both groups. As far as virological, haematological and biochemical parameters are concerned, no statistical significant difference was observed between treated and untreated patients. Moreover no adverse outcome was observed among untreated patients always having a HCMV viral load below 4log(10)/ml.

CONCLUSIONS

This study reinforces the need of monitoring of HCMV seropositive renal-transplant recipients based on HCMV diagnosis and quantification by real-time PCR. The results showed that HCMV viraemic patients may benefit of absence of antiviral treatment when they have a low viral load (below 4log(10)/ml) and absence of clinical and/or biological abnormalities. Further studies are required now to validate the threshold value at which we should begin pre-emptive therapy.

Prospective study of relationship between cytomegalovirus pneumonia and viral load in renal transplant recipients

The present study prospectively examined the relationship between cytomegalovirus interstitial pneumonia (CMV-IP) and viral load among 56 renal transplant recipients. We sought to identify the cutoff of viral load to predict CMV-IP. Blood samples were obtained weekly within the first 2 months and every second week during 2 to 6 months after kidney transplantations. A commercial real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-method was applied to quantify CMV-DNA in plasma or in leukocytes. Among 54 renal transplant recipients who were analyzed for CMV-DNA in the blood (96.4%), 8 experienced CMV-IP (14.3%) and 2 died (3.6%). After kidney transplantation, CMV-DNA loads were near 0 in plasma before the week 4 and before the week 3 in leukocytes among both groups. From week 5 (week 4, in leukocytes), plasma CMV-DNA loads in the CMV-IP group increased, the peak value reached at week 8 in plasma and the week 9 in leukocytes. Whereas, the CMV-DNA loads both in plasma and in leukocytes in the non-CMV-IP group fluctuated at lower levels, those in plasma were significantly different between the 2 groups at the weeks 5, 7, and 9. For CMV-DNA in leukocytes, there were significant differences between 2 groups from week 6 to week 11. The present study demonstrated that dynamic determination of CMV-DNA may predict the occurrence of CMV-IP. Viral loads over 10(4) copies/mL plasma continuing for 3 weeks may serve as a cutoff to predict CMV-IP.

CYTOMEGALOVIRUS INFECTION IN ORGAN-TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS: DIAGNOSTIC VALUE OF PP65 ANTIGEN TEST, QUALITATIVE POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION (PCR) AND QUANTITATIVE TAQMAN PCR

BACKGROUND

The human cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in transplant patients. In this study, we compared the diagnostic value of pp65 antigen test, qualitative nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and quantitative Taqman PCR in predicting the clinical outcome of CMV infection.

METHODS

A total of 169 samples derived from 59 organ-transplant recipients (kidney n= 46, liver n= 11, kidney and pancreas n= 2) were analyzed. Peripheral blood leukocytes (PBL) were isolated using dextran gradient centrifugation, and 2 x 10 cells were analyzed for pp65 antigen by immunofluorescence. A crude DNA extract obtained from the same number of cells was used for qualitative nested PCR and quantitative Taqman PCR analysis. RESULTS.: The correlation coefficient of pp65 antigen test and Taqman PCR was R= 0.699 (P = 0.001). With cut-off values for pp65 antigen test set at greater than 10 positive nuclei per 2 x 10 PBL, sensitivity was 91%, and positive predictive value (PPV) was 70%. When the corresponding cut-off value for Taqman PCR was applied (>125000 genome copies per 2 x 10 PBL), a sensitivity of 83% and a PPV of 68% were found. Both assays allowed for the monitoring of successful antiviral therapy. Although qualitative nested PCR was highly sensitive (95%), it was less useful in predicting CMV disease (PPV 47%) and in therapy control.

CONCLUSION

Our data show that pp65 antigen test and Taqman PCR are almost equivalent in the monitoring of CMV infection and disease when identical cell numbers are used for both assays.

Quantitation of cytomegalovirus DNA by the polymerase chain reaction as a predictor of disease in solid organ transplantation

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is an important cause of morbidity in solid organ recipients. Early markers to identify the progress of the infection and patients at high risk are required in order to apply a strategy of pre-emptive therapy. The efficacy of pre-emptive therapy relies on accurate laboratory tests to monitor CMV infection. The evaluation of CMV DNA kinetics by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is widely used for the management of CMV infection but markers predicting the progression of the infection and standardization of the technique are essential for the clinical interpretation of PCR results. A commercially available PCR system, the COBAS AMPLICOR Monitor (Roche Diagnostics, Brachburg, NJ), was used for the quantitation of CMV DNA in weekly blood samples (n = 504) from 47 solid organ recipients in the first 6 months after transplantation. PCR results were evaluated according to the development of clinical disease in order to find a DNA threshold and time points predicting the progression of CMV infection. Week 4 from transplantation was the earliest time point to note a significant difference between those patients who eventually developed CMV disease (n = 30) and those who remained asymptomatically infected (n = 17). At week 4, viral loads were significantly higher in patients who developed CMV disease than in asymptomatic infections (median value: 4 log(10)/10(6) leukocytes vs. 2.8, P < 0.0001). At week 4, a DNA level >/=4 log(10)/10(6) leukocytes was associated with a 45.37 odds ratio for CMV disease. Any increase >/=1 log from the first DNA detection to week 4 correlated with the clinical progression of CMV infection (odds ratio 1.74). In those patients who were treated with anti-CMV therapy, a >97% reduction of the baseline viral load was associated with a complete therapeutic success. In conclusion, CMV infection is a highly dynamic process and the quantitation of CMV DNA by PCR is a powerful marker to control successfully the infection, but a strict follow-up of the recipient and standardized PCR tests are mandatory for the best management of the infection.

Automated extraction and quantification of human cytomegalovirus DNA in whole blood by real-time PCR assay

The measurement of human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) DNA in blood is becoming the standard method for monitoring HCMV infection in immune-suppressed and unsuppressed patients. As various blood compartments can be used, we have compared the HCMV DNA measured in whole blood (WB), peripheral blood leukocytes (PBL), and plasma by real-time PCR. We tested 286 samples: HCMV DNA was extracted automatically from WB and PBL with the MagNA Pure instrument (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) and manually from plasma samples. The HCMV DNA from WB, PBL, and plasma was measured by real-time Light Cycler PCR. Primers and probe were located in the UL 83 region. HCMV DNA was detected more frequently in WB (88.5%) than in the PBL (65.7%) (P < 0.0001) or the plasma (55.2%) (P < 0.0001). There was a good correlation between the positive results in WB and in PBL (r = 0.68; P < 0.0001), and 3.15 log(10) genome copies in 200000 PBL, equivalent to the threshold value of 50 pp65-positive polymorphonuclear cells per 200000 leukocytes, was equivalent to 3.4 log(10) genome copies in 200 microl of WB. WB was shown to be suitable for automated extraction and the quantitation of HCMV DNA by real-time Light Cycler PCR by analysis of serial samples from representative patients of various populations. This system may be very useful for monitoring of immune-suppressed and unsuppressed patients.

Longitudinal study of herpesviruses in kidney transplant recipients in Cuba

We compared a multiplex polymerase chain reaction assay and a shell vial assay for the detection of herpesviruses infection in 13 Cuban patients who had received kidney transplants. Cytomegalovirus and human herpesvirus 6 were detected in these patients.

Human cytomegalovirus DNA in plasma and serum specimens of renal transplant recipients is highly fragmented

Quantitation of cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNA in plasma and serum by PCR is increasingly used to identify patients at risk for developing CMV disease and to monitor the efficacy of antiviral therapy. Although CMV DNA levels are generally interpreted as viral loads, the exact nature of the viral DNA in these specimens is unknown. We studied the state of CMV DNA in plasma and serum specimens obtained from three renal transplant recipients at peak viral DNA levels during primary CMV infection. For this purpose, DNA isolated from these specimens was fractionated by size, and CMV DNA levels in the resulting DNA fractions were measured by quantitative PCR targeted at large (578-bp) and small (134-bp) amplicons. These experiments showed that the molecular sizes of DNA fragments from which CMV DNA is amplified were small (<2,000 bp), indicating that CMV DNA in plasma and serum is highly fragmented. Furthermore, CMV DNA levels were consistently higher when targeted at the smaller amplicon, providing additional evidence for the fragmentation of viral DNA. In conclusion, the first results with three patients have shown that CMV DNA in plasma and serum is highly fragmented and does not necessarily reflect the amount of infectious virus. These observations have potential consequences for understanding CMV pathogenesis and interpreting CMV DNA levels in individual patient management.

The association of viral infection and chronic allograft nephropathy with graft dysfunction after renal transplantation

BACKGROUND

The long-term effect of viral infections on graft dysfunction and rejection after renal transplantation is uncertain.

METHODS

A cohort of 37 renal transplant recipients was followed prospectively for 3 years. Creatinine clearance rate at 6 months and 3 years and chronic allograft nephropathy were correlated with the detection of cytomegalovirus (CMV), human herpesvirus 6 and human herpesvirus 7 and BK virus DNA, CMV disease, and acute rejection.

RESULTS

CMV disease was significantly associated with poor graft function at 6 months, whereas chronic allograft nephropathy was associated with graft dysfunction at 3 years. Both CMV disease and detection of human herpesvirus 6 DNA were associated with chronic allograft nephropathy.

CONCLUSIONS

CMV disease was a significant cause of early graft dysfunction, whereas the presence of chronic allograft nephropathy was the main determinant of poor long-term graft function. The role of viral infections in chronic allograft nephropathy deserves further investigation.

Infections in recipients of kidney transplants

A review of infections in kidney transplant recipients is presented in this article, beginning with a discussion of the pretransplant infectious diseases evaluation and an overview of the timing of infectious posttransplant, and then focusing on individual types of infection.

Comparison of plasma polymerase chain reaction and pp65-antigenemia assay in the quantification of cytomegalovirus in liver and kidney transplant patients

BACKGROUND

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a significant problem in transplantation. The antiviral treatment is based on the clinical symptoms and the rapid laboratory diagnosis. Although polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methods have already been widely used, the clinical correlation of the findings is not clear.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to investigate the usefulness of a quantitative plasma PCR test and compare it with the pp65-antigenemia test in the detection of clinically significant CMV infections in liver and kidney transplant patients.

STUDY DESIGN

The clinical material consisted of 253 consecutive blood samples was tested using a quantitative polymerase chain reaction test, Cobas Amplicor CMV Monitor (Roche) and pp65 antigenemia assay. Plasma was used for PCR and leucocytes were used for the antigenemia test.

RESULTS

CMV was detected in 89 out of 253 blood samples by one or both methods. PCR detected 78 (range 274-165000 copies/ml) and pp65 antigenemia test 79 (range 1-1500 positive cells/50000) of the positive findings. The sensitivity and specificity of PCR test was 86 and 94%, respectively. The PCR detected all clinically significant CMV infections (>10 positive cells in pp65 test) and infections which required antiviral treatment. In addition, the correlation between the two tests was almost linear.

CONCLUSIONS

The quantitative PCR appears to be a suitable alternative to diagnose and monitor CMV infections in transplant patients.

CMV infection of liver transplant recipients: comparison of antigenemia and molecular biology assays

BACKGROUND

CMV is a major clinical problem in transplant recipients. Thus, it is important to use sensitive and specific diagnostic techniques to rapidly and accurately detect CMV infection and identify patients at risk of developing CMV disease. In the present study, CMV infection after liver transplantation was monitored retrospectively by two molecular biology assays - a quantitative PCR assay and a qualitative NASBA assay. The results were compared with those obtained by prospective pp65 antigenemia determinations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

87 consecutive samples from 10 liver transplanted patients were tested for CMV by pp65 antigenemia, and CMV monitor and NASBA pp67 mRNA assay.

RESULTS

CMV infection was detected in all patients by antigenemia and CMV monitor, whereas NASBA assay identified only 8/10 patients with viremia. Furthermore, CMV infection was never detected earlier by molecular biology assays than by antigenemia. Only 5/10 patients with CMV infection developed CMV disease. Using a cut off value of 8 cells/50,000, antigenemia was found to be the assay that better identified patients at risk of developing CMV disease. However, the kinetics of the onset of infection detected by NASBA and CMV monitor seemed to have better identified patients at risk of developing CMV disease. Furthermore, before onset of disease, CMV pp67 mRNA was found to have similar or better negative and positive predictive values for the development of CMV disease.

CONCLUSIONS

The present data, suggests that the concomitant use of antigenemia and pp67 mRNA assay gives the best identification of patients at risk of developing CMV disease.

Prophylaxis for CMV should not now replace pre-emptive therapy in solid organ transplantation

Pre-emptive therapy (PET) initiated on the basis of HCMV positivity in the blood using sensitive methods such as PCR, nucleic acid sequence based amplification or antigenaemia offers several advantages for the management of HCMV infection. These include the ability to target antiviral drug therapy to those most at risk of future disease, minimising drug exposure and maximising cost-benefit. In addition, allowing limited replication to occur also provides immune stimulation which will be important for future control of HCMV replication. In contrast, prophylaxis is a high-cost strategy which exposes all patients to potentially toxic drugs, does not facilitate immune priming and leads to the development of late HCMV infection and disease in high-risk patients.

Prophylaxis for CMV should now replace pre-emptive therapy in solid organ transplantation

Cytomegalovirus is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in transplantation. Controversy exists concerning whether prophylactic or pre-emptive therapy is the optimal strategy for preventing CMV disease. In addition, CMV impacts the transplanted graft, transplant recipient and transplant programme beyond just causing CMV disease; thus questioning whether 'asymptomatic' CMV replication should also be prevented. In this Forum article, prophylactic therapy is advocated as the preferred approach for preventing CMV disease. Prophylactic therapy has a large body of supportive controlled clinical studies demonstrating its efficacy and cost effectiveness. In addition, prophylactic therapy has the benefit of preventing other herpes viruses and other opportunistic superinfections by reducing the immunosuppressive effects of CMV. Moreover, a small but growing body of information suggests that prophylactic therapy may also have a beneficial effect on organ outcomes, including rejection. In contrast, pre-emptive therapy is limited by its reliance on intensive surveillance, which presents logistical difficulties and requires perfect patient compliance. Ambiguity still exists concerning the best surveillance method and its effect on patient-care costs. Each proposed diagnostic approach has limitations, which are affected by the prevalence of CMV in the population studied, the particular assay employed, and the frequency of surveillance. The suggested benefits of pre-emptive therapy, such as decreased cost, fewer adverse medication effects and less antiviral resistance have not been adequately proven in head-to-head clinical studies. We therefore support the proposition that transplant patients at risk for any level of CMV replication will significantly benefit from effective antiviral prophylaxis.

Recommendations for the outpatient surveillance of renal transplant recipients. American Society of Transplantation

Many complications after renal transplantation can be prevented if they are detected early. Guidelines have been developed for the prevention of diseases in the general population, but there are no comprehensive guidelines for the prevention of diseases and complications after renal transplantation. Therefore, the Clinical Practice Guidelines Committee of the American Society of Transplantation developed these guidelines to help physicians and other health care workers provide optimal care for renal transplant recipients. The guidelines are also intended to indirectly help patients receive the access to care that they need to ensure long-term allograft survival, by attempting to systematically define what that care encompasses. The guidelines are applicable to all adult and pediatric renal transplant recipients, and they cover the outpatient screening for and prevention of diseases and complications that commonly occur after renal transplantation. They do not cover the diagnosis and treatment of diseases and complications after they become manifest, and they do not cover the pretransplant evaluation of renal transplant candidates. The guidelines are comprehensive, but they do not pretend to cover every aspect of care. As much as possible, the guidelines are evidence-based, and each recommendation has been given a subjective grade to indicate the strength of evidence that supports the recommendation. It is hoped that these guidelines will provide a framework for additional discussion and research that will improve the care of renal transplant recipients.