Prospective evaluation of detoxification pathways as markers of cutaneous adverse reactions to sulphonamides in AIDS

Sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim-induced liver injury and genetic polymorphisms of NAT2 and CYP2C9 in Taiwan

OBJECTIVES

Sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim (SMX-TMP) is one of the most frequently used antibiotics. SMX is metabolized by N-acetyltransferase (NAT) and cytochrome P450 2C9 (CYP2C9) to nontoxic or toxic intermediates. Little is known about the association between genetic variations of these enzymes and SMX-TMP-induced liver injury (SILI). The aim of this study was to explore the genetic polymorphisms of NAT2 and CYP2C9 and the susceptibility to SILI in a Han Chinese population.

METHODS

A total of 158 patients with SILI and 145 controls were recruited in this study. PCR-based genotyping with matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight was used to assay the major NAT2 and CYP2C9 genotypes including NAT2 rs1495741, rs1041983, rs1801280, CYP2C9 rs1799853, rs1057910 and rs4918758.

RESULTS

The SILI group had a higher frequency of the NAT2 rs1495741 variant AA genotype and rs1041983 variant TT genotype than the controls (42.4 vs. 25.5%; P = 0.008, and 40.5 vs. 25.5%; P = 0.022, respectively). The SILI group had more slow acetylators than the controls (43.7 vs. 25.5%; P = 0.001). There were no significant differences in the genetic variations of CYP2C9 between the SILI and control groups. After adjusting for confounding factors, the NAT2 slow acetylators still had an increased risk of SILI (adjusted OR: 2.49; 95% confidence interval: 1.46-4.24; P = 0.001), especially in those with hepatocellular and mixed type SILI.

CONCLUSIONS

NAT2 slow acetylators are associated with a higher risk of SILI in the Han Chinese population. However, CYP2C9 genetic polymorphisms are not associated with the susceptibility to SILI.

Role of N-acetyltransferase 2 gene polymorphism in the human pathology

Nowadays multiple heterogeneous chemicals affect the human body. They include drugs, household chemicals, dyes, food supplements and others. The human organism can modify, inactivate, and eliminate the chemicals by biotransformation enzymes. But it is well known that biotransformation can lead to toxification phenomenon. Individuals differ from each other by the rate of chemical modification that promotes accumulation of toxins and carcinogens in some patients. An N-acetyltransferase 2 enzyme participates in the aromatic amines second phase metabolism. This work reviews the acetyltransferase gene polymorphism possible role in diseases development including drug-induced organs damage.

Gene of acetyltransferase has polymorphisms associated with two haplotypes of  fast and slow substrate acetylation. Gene alleles combine in three genotypes: fast, intermediate, and slow acetylators. Acetylation rate plays a significant role in side effects development during tuberculosis treatment and cancer pathogenesis. Recently, new data described the role of enzyme in development of non-infectious diseases in the human. Scientists consider that slow acetylation genotype in combination with high xenobiotic load result in accumulation of toxic substances able to damage cells.

Therefore, acetyltransferase genotyping helps to reveal risk groups of cancer and non-infectious disease development and to prescribe more effective and safe doses of drugs. 

Genotype-Guided Hydralazine Therapy

BACKGROUND

Despite its approval in 1953, hydralazine hydrochloride continues to be used in the management of resistant hypertension, a condition frequently managed by nephrologists and other clinicians. Hydralazine hydrochloride undergoes metabolism by the N-acetyltransferase 2 (NAT2) enzyme. NAT2 is highly polymorphic as approximately 50% of the general population are slow acetylators. In this review, we first evaluate the link between NAT2 genotype and phenotype. We then assess the evidence available for genotype-guided therapy of hydralazine, specifically addressing associations of NAT2 acetylator status with hydralazine pharmacokinetics, antihypertensive efficacy, and toxicity.

SUMMARY

There is a critical need to use hydralazine in some patients with resistant hypertension. Available evidence supports a significant link between genotype and NAT2 enzyme activity as 29 studies were identified with an overall concordance between genotype and phenotype of 92%. The literature also supports an association between acetylator status and hydralazine concentration, as fourteen of fifteen identified studies revealed significant relationships with a consistent direction of effect. Although fewer studies are available to directly link acetylator status with hydralazine antihypertensive efficacy, the evidence from this smaller set of studies is significant in 7 of 9 studies identified. Finally, 5 studies were identified which support the association of acetylator status with hydralazine-induced lupus. Clinicians should maintain vigilance when prescribing maximum doses of hydralazine. Key Messages: NAT2 slow acetylator status predicts increased hydralazine levels, which may lead to increased efficacy and adverse effects. Caution should be exercised in slow acetylators with total daily hydralazine doses of 200 mg or more. Fast acetylators are at risk for inefficacy at lower doses of hydralazine. With appropriate guidance on the usage of NAT2 genotype, clinicians can adopt a personalized approach to hydralazine dosing and prescription, enabling more efficient and safe treatment of resistant hypertension.

N-acetyltransferase: the practical consequences of polymorphic activity in man

Over the years, numerous studies have supported the premise that individuals possessing the "slow acetylator" phenotype are more at risk from developing drug side-effects. Most prominent amongst these reports are those concerned with hepatotoxicity and peripheral neuropathy following treatment with isoniazid, lupus-like symptoms during procainamide therapy and experiencing hypersensitivity reactions to the various sulphonamide derivatives. Similarly, "slow acetylators" undergoing heavy exposure to arylamines and related carcinogens are more likely to develop bladder cancer. Contrariwise, there appears a slight risk of "rapid acetylators" developing pancreatic tumours.Other therapeutic agents for which polymorphic N-acetylation plays a minor role in their metabolism have been investigated but any impact of this metabolic difference on clinical efficacy or associated toxicity is still under question. In the search for clues as to the underlying aetiology, patient groups with many disease states have been examined for association with differences in N-acetylation and the majority have provided data that could be interpreted as equivocal. Studies have given contradictory, often opposing, results, calculated risk factors that are (perhaps) just significant but certainly not high, and patients within the cohorts who are always exceptions. Undoubtedly, other as yet unappreciated factors are at play.

Expression and genotype-dependent catalytic activity of N-acetyltransferase 2 (NAT2) in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells and its modulation by Sirtuin 1

N-acetyltransferase 2 (NAT2) catalyzes the biotransformation of numerous arylamine and hydrazine drugs and carcinogens. Genetic polymorphisms of NAT2 modify drug efficacy and toxicity and susceptibility to diseases such as cancer and type 2 diabetes. Expression of NAT2 has been documented in the liver and gastrointestinal tract but not in other tissues. Deacetylation of cytosolic proteins by sirtuins is a post-translational modification important in regulatory networks of diverse cellular processes. The aim of the present study was to investigate NAT2 expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) and the effects of NAT2 genotype and Sirtuin 1 (SIRT1). Both NAT2 and SIRT1 proteins were expressed on PBMC. Their expression was more prevalent on CD3+ compared to CD19+ and CD56+ cell populations. N-acetylation capacity of PBMC exhibited a NAT2 gene-dose response toward the N-acetylation of isoniazid. Subjects with rapid NAT2 genotype showed an apparent V_max of 42.1 ± 2.4; intermediate NAT2 genotypes an apparent V_max of 22.6 ± 2.2; and slow acetylator NAT2 genotypes an apparent V_max of 19.9 ± 1.7 nM acetyl-isoniazid/24 h/million cells. The N-acetylation capacity of NAT2 in the presence of SIRT1 enhancer was significantly decreased (p < 0.001), conversely, the transient silencing of SIRT1 resulted in an increase of N-acetylation capacity (p < 0.001). These findings are the first report of NAT2 genotype-dependent expression on PBMC and post-translational modification by SIRT1. These findings constitute a substantial advance in our understanding of human N-acetyltransferase expression and a new much less invasive method for measurement of human NAT2 expression and phenotype.

Hepatic expression profiles in retroviral infection: relevance to drug hypersensitivity risk

HIV‐infected patients show a markedly increased risk of delayed hypersensitivity (HS) reactions to potentiated sulfonamide antibiotics (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole or TMP/SMX). Some studies have suggested altered SMX biotransformation in HIV infection, but hepatic biotransformation pathways have not been evaluated directly. Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is another chronic inflammatory disease with a higher incidence of sulfonamide HS, but it is unclear whether retroviral infection and SLE share risk factors for drug HS. We hypothesized that retroviral infection would lead to dysregulation of hepatic pathways of SMX biotransformation, as well as pathway alterations in common with SLE that could contribute to drug HS risk. We characterized hepatic expression profiles and enzymatic activities in an SIV‐infected macaque model of retroviral infection, and found no evidence for dysregulation of sulfonamide drug biotransformation pathways. Specifically, NAT1,NAT2,CYP2C8,CYP2C9,CYB5R3,MARC1/2, and glutathione‐related genes (GCLC,GCLM,GSS,GSTM1, and GSTP1) were not differentially expressed in drug naïve SIVmac239‐infected male macaques compared to age‐matched controls, and activities for SMX N‐acetylation and SMX hydroxylamine reduction were not different. However, multiple genes that are reportedly over‐expressed in SLE patients were also up‐regulated in retroviral infection, to include enhanced immunoproteasomal processing and presentation of antigens as well as up‐regulation of gene clusters that may be permissive to autoimmunity. These findings support the hypothesis that pathways downstream from drug biotransformation may be primarily important in drug HS risk in HIV infection.

Immunogenicity of trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole in a macaque model of HIV infection

BACKGROUND

Sulfonamide hypersensitivity has a high incidence in HIV infection and correlates with low CD4+ counts, but the mechanisms are not understood. The aims of this study were to determine whether trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX) led to SMX adduct formation, immunogenicity, or signs of drug hypersensitivity in SIV-infected rhesus macaques, and whether differences in antioxidants, pro-inflammatory mediators, or SMX disposition were predictive of drug immunogenicity.

METHODS

Nine macaques chronically infected with SIVmac239 and 7 non-infected controls were studied. Baseline blood ascorbate, glutathione, IFN-γ, LPS, sCD14, and cytochrome b₅ reductase measurements were obtained, macaques were dosed with TMP/SMX (120mg/kg/day p.o. for 14days), and SMX metabolites, lymph node drug adducts, drug-responsive T cells, and anti-SMX antibodies were measured.

RESULTS

Four of 9 of SIV-positive (44%), and 3 of 7 SIV negative (43%) macaques had drug-responsive T cells or antibodies to SMX. Two macaques developed facial or truncal rash; these animals had the highest levels of lymph node drug adducts. Antioxidants, pro-inflammatory mediators, and SMX metabolites were not predictive of drug immunogenicity; however, the Mamu DRB1*0401/0406/0411 genotype was significantly over-represented in immune responders.

CONCLUSIONS

Unlike other animal models, macaques develop an immune response, and possible rash, in response to therapeutic dosages of TMP/SMX. Studying more animals with CD4+ counts <200cells/μl, along with moderately restricted ascorbate intake to match deficiencies seen in humans, may better model the risk of SMX hypersensitivity in HIV-infection. In addition, the role of Mamu-DRB1 genotype in modeling drug hypersensitivity in retroviral infection deserves further study.

Cutaneous drug hypersensitivity: immunological and genetic perspective

Drug hypersensitivity is an unpredictable, immunologically mediated adverse reaction, clustered in a genetically predisposed individual. The role of "hapten concept" in immune sensitization has recently been contested by the "pharmacological interaction" hypothesis. After completion of the "human genome project" and with the availability of high-resolution genotyping, genetic susceptibility to hypersensitivity for certain drugs has been proved beyond doubt though the trend is ethnicity and phenotype dependent. Application of this newly acquired knowledge may reduce or abolish the morbidity and mortality associated with cutaneous drug hypersensitivity.

Pharmacogenetics, drug-metabolizing enzymes, and clinical practice

The application of pharmacogenetics holds great promise for individualized therapy. However, it has little clinical reality at present, despite many claims. The main problem is that the evidence base supporting genetic testing before therapy is weak. The pharmacology of the drugs subject to inherited variability in metabolism is often complex. Few have simple or single pathways of elimination. Some have active metabolites or enantiomers with different activities and pathways of elimination. Drug dosing is likely to be influenced only if the aggregate molar activity of all active moieties at the site of action is predictably affected by genotype or phenotype. Variation in drug concentration must be significant enough to provide "signal" over and above normal variation, and there must be a genuine concentration-effect relationship. The therapeutic index of the drug will also influence test utility. After considering all of these factors, the benefits of prospective testing need to be weighed against the costs and against other endpoints of effect. It is not surprising that few drugs satisfy these requirements. Drugs (and enzymes) for which there is a reasonable evidence base supporting genotyping or phenotyping include suxamethonium/mivacurium (butyrylcholinesterase), and azathioprine/6-mercaptopurine (thiopurine methyltransferase). Drugs for which there is a potential case for prospective testing include warfarin (CYP2C9), perhexiline (CYP2D6), and perhaps the proton pump inhibitors (CYP2C19). No other drugs have an evidence base that is sufficient to justify prospective testing at present, although some warrant further evaluation. In this review we summarize the current evidence base for pharmacogenetics in relation to drug-metabolizing enzymes.

Increased adverse drug reactions to antimicrobials and anticonvulsants in patients with HIV infection

OBJECTIVE

To review the incidence, signs, symptoms, and mechanisms of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) to sulfonamides, anticonvulsants, and antimycobacterial medications among people with HIV.

DATA SOURCES

Searches of MEDLINE/PubMed (1980-November 2005) and National Library of Medicine Meeting Abstracts (1989-November 2005), as well as hand searches of journals and abstracts, were conducted to identify primary literature. Reference lists were reviewed to identify additional relevant reports.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Relevant articles and abstracts, particularly of in vitro experiments and clinical studies, were compiled and reviewed.

DATA SYNTHESIS

ADRs, especially in HIV-infected patients, are a cause for concern. Sulfonamides, anticonvulsants, and antimycobacterial drugs are commonly used to prevent and treat complications of HIV, including seizures and opportunistic infections. Patients with HIV have a much greater rate of ADRs to these drug classes, including severe and life-threatening hypersensitivity reactions. Several mechanisms of these ADRs have been postulated. Sulfamethoxazole and anticonvulsant hypersensitivity may involve the increased formation and decreased detoxification of reactive metabolites. The mechanisms for the marked increase in hypersensitivity ADRs to antimycobacterial drugs may be related to an altered immune profile in patients infected with both tuberculosis and HIV.

CONCLUSIONS

ADRs to antimicrobial and anticonvulsant therapy cause markedly increased morbidity and mortality in HIV-positive patients. Further research involving the interaction between HIV and the increased ADRs to these drugs is required.

Immune response to xenobiotics in the skin: from contact sensitivity to drug allergy

Skin is the most frequent target of adverse drug reactions. These cutaneous drug reactions (CDRs) show varied clinical manifestations ranging from mildly discomforting rashes to life-threatening Stevens-Johnson syndrome or toxic epidermal necrolysis. Most CDRs appear to be immune mediated, although the mechanism by which they are initiated remains unclear. In this review, current knowledge of the mechanisms by which xenobiotics provoke immune responses in the skin after epicutaneous administration and how similar reactions may occur after systemic routes are summarised. This review also discusses a variety of genetic or environmental factors that may determine the susceptibility of individuals towards immune responses in skin following drug exposure.

Immune mechanisms in drug allergy

Clinicians had suspected for years that drug eruptions were probably mediated by immune mechanisms because their timing suggested sensitization and specific immunologic memory rather than direct toxicity. An immune response to medications was also demonstrated by positive skin tests and by several types of in vitro tests that evidenced immediate or delayed hypersensitivity. In the last decade several teams of researchers obtained in vitro drug-specific human T-cell clones, in a variety of clinical types of drug eruptions. These clones were produced from blood or skin mononuclear cells of patients with a history of drug reaction by stimulation in vitro with drug. They were either of CD4 or CD8 phenotypes. Drug specific clones were stimulated by the parent drug much more often than by reactive metabolites. That challenged the classical "hapten hypothesis" that the immune response was initiated by reactive metabolites combined to self proteins. The medication usually stimulated specific T-cells after non-covalent binding to major histocompatibility (MHC) molecules on antigen presenting cells. In toxic epidermal necrolysis, T-lymphocytes present at the site of lesions, exhibited a drug specific cytotoxicity against autologous target cells, or allogeneic cells that shared the same HLA than autologous cells. This MHC class I restriction and mediation of death by perforin/granzyme release, is the classical behavior of cytotoxic T lymphocytes, like those operating in the reject of a transplanted organ. MHC restriction could explain the key role of HLA genes as predisposing factors to severe drug reactions. A strong association between HLA and hypersensitivity to abacavir, SJS or TEN to carbamazepine or allopurinol has been recently demonstrated. Resemblance to graft rejection points to the possible therapeution value of immuno suppressive agents. Most drug eruptions appear to result from T-cell mediated delayed hypersensitivity. The secondary activation of different cascades of cytokines, may contribute to the heterogeneity of clinical presentations.

Genetic factors in the predisposition to drug-induced hypersensitivity reactions

Drug hypersensitivity reactions can occur with most drugs, although the frequency, severity, and clinical manifestations vary. Case reports have suggested that there may be familial clustering of drug hypersensitivity suggesting a genetic predisposition. As with most other forms of drug response, predisposition to drug hypersensitivity reactions is likely to be multifactorial and multigenic. Given the immune pathogenesis of these reactions, it is perhaps not surprising that the most significant genetic associations have been identified in the major histocompatibility complex for drugs such as abacavir, carbamazepine, and allopurinol. For abacavir, it has been suggested that preprescription genotyping for HLA-B*5701 in whites may reduce the incidence of hypersensitivity. It is likely that as our knowledge of variation in the human genome improves, coupled with improvements in technology, many more significant genetic predisposing factors for drug hypersensitivity are likely to be identified in the next decade. However, as we search for these genetic factors, it is important that we do not forget environmental predisposition, and to bear in mind that a genetic marker for drug hypersensitivity in one population may not necessarily be relevant for another population. Notwithstanding the advances in genetic technologies, the ultimate determinant of success in this area of research will be the identification and careful phenotyping of patients with drug hypersensitivity reactions. As we progress to whole genome scanning, in order to satisfy the requirements for adequate statistical power, the identification of large numbers of carefully phenotyped patients will be feasible only through international collaborations.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Pharmacogenetic Tests as Tools in Pharmacovigilance

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) and pharmacogenetic tests play a major role in minimising adverse drug reactions and enhancing optimal therapeutic response. The response to medication varies greatly between individuals, according to genetic constitution, age, sex, co-morbidities, environmental factors including diet and lifestyle (e.g. smoking and alcohol intake), and drug-related factors such as pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic drug-drug interactions. Most adverse drug reactions are type A reactions, i.e. plasma-level dependent, and represent one of the major causes of hospitalisation, in some cases leading to death. However, they may be avoidable to some extent if pharmacokinetic and pharmacogenetic factors are taken into consideration. This article provides a review of the literature and describes how to apply and interpret TDM and certain pharmacogenetic tests and is illustrated by case reports. An algorithm on the use of TDM and pharmacogenetic tests to help characterise adverse drug reactions is also presented. Although, in the scientific community, differences in drug response are increasingly recognised, there is an urgent need to translate this knowledge into clinical recommendations. Databases on drug-drug interactions and the impact of pharmacogenetic polymorphisms and adverse drug reaction information systems will be helpful to guide clinicians in individualised treatment choices.

Likelihood and Mechanisms of Cross-Allergenicity Between Sulfonamide Antibiotics and Other Drugs Containing a Sulfonamide Functional Group

Concerns about cross-allergenicity between sulfonamide antibiotics and nonantibiotic, sulfonamide-containing drugs persist and can complicate patients' drug therapy unnecessarily. No interaction between the human immune system and the sulfonamide functional group has been demonstrated. The immunologic determinant of type I, immediate hypersensitivity responses to sulfonamide antibiotics is the N1 heterocyclic ring. Nonantibiotic sulfonamides do not contain this structural feature. Non-type I hypersensitivity responses to sulfonamide antibiotics are largely attributable to reactive metabolites that may cause either direct cytotoxicity or immunologic response. Formation of these metabolites is a stereospecific process that occurs at the N4 amino nitrogen of the sulfonamide antibiotics, a structure also not found on any nonantibiotic sulfonamide drugs. The stereospecificity of these reactions implies that cross-reactivity with nonantibiotic sulfonamide-containing drugs is highly unlikely; this assertion is supported by recent literature. However, T-cell recognition of unmetabolized, nonhaptenated parent sulfonamide antibiotic appears to occur in a small subset of hypersensitive patients. Several of the severe cutaneous reactions associated with sulfonamide antibiotics are mediated by T cells. It is not known whether T-cell recognition of antibiotic is related to the sulfonamide functional group. Until the mechanism of this recognition is elucidated, cross-reactivity with nonantibiotic sulfonamides appears to remain at least theoretically possible.

Slow acetylator phenotype and genotype in HIV-positive patients with sulphamethoxazole hypersensitivity

AIMS

To test the role of acetylator status, and to investigate the reported discrepancy between acetylator phenotype and genotype in HIV-positive patients with sulphamethoxazole (SMX) hypersensitivity.

METHODS

Forty HIV-positive patients (32 of whom were SMX-hypersensitive), and 26 healthy volunteers, were genotyped by polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) analysis, and phenotyped using dapsone (50 mg) as a probe, for acetylator status. Sequencing of the NAT2 exon was performed where discrepancy between phenotyping and genotyping was detected. Our results were also pooled with published studies addressing slow acetylator status in HIV-positive SMX-hypersensitive patients.

RESULTS

Slow acetylator genotype and phenotype frequencies did not differ between HIV-positive SMX-hypersensitive and nonhypersensitive patients, and healthy controls, which was further confirmed in a meta-analysis of published studies (pooled odds ratio 2.25, 95% confidence interval 0.45, 11.17). Discordance between phenotype and genotype was resolved in four of the subjects by sequencing of the whole NAT2 exon, which revealed rare mutations, leaving three (9%) HIV-positive SMX-hypersensitive patients and one (4%) healthy volunteer who continued to demonstrate the discordance.

CONCLUSIONS

Slow acetylator phenotype or genotype is unlikely to predispose to SMX hypersensitivity in HIV-positive patients, although a minor role cannot be excluded. Phenotype-genotype discrepancies are partly due to nondetection of all rare alleles by PCR methodology, and can be circumvented by sequencing of the gene in patients showing a discrepancy.

Monitoring adverse drug reactions to sulfonamide antibiotics in human immunodeficiency virus-infected individuals

Patients infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) are at higher risk for adverse drug reactions from trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) than the HIV-negative population. Studying the HIV-positive population the authors aimed to validate the predictive and diagnostic value of the lymphocyte toxicity assay (LTA) for adverse drug reactions. Patient lymphocytes were analyzed for toxicity to SMX and TMP. Of 35 enrolled HIV patients, 18 had TMP-SMX hypersensitivity syndrome reaction (HSR); 10 tolerated the drug; and 5 had never received the drug. When cases with HSR were compared with controls that tolerated the drugs, cytotoxicity was higher for cases: 29.5% +/- 10.1% versus 19.3% +/- 11.2% for SMX (P < 0.022) and 25.0% +/- 11.9% versus 16.3% +/- 11.0% for TMP (P < 0.04). The authors' proposed threshold value for assigning positive results for TMP and SMX hypersensitivities was 22.5%. The LTA has a strong potential for use as a diagnostic tool to assess TMP-SMX hypersensitivity in HIV-infected individuals. Larger patient populations, as well as in vitro studies are needed to further address the reasons for elevated results in immunocompromised patients and to validate the usefulness of the test.

Mechanistic perspectives on sulfonamide-induced cutaneous drug reactions

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Idiosyncratic drug reactions continue to limit the therapeutic utility of sulfonamide drugs because of their associated morbidity and mortality. Cutaneous reactions are the predominant reasons for withdrawal of such drugs from use in patients. As a consequence of the recognized metabolic and immunologic capability of the skin, an understanding of the pathogenic role of this tissue in the development of sulfonamide-induced cutaneous drug reactions may provide insight into the mechanisms and risk factors for these and other adverse drug events.

RECENT FINDINGS

In the present review we discuss currently available mechanistic information, including issues related to drug bioactivation and adduct formation, immunoresponsiveness, and immune dysregulation, for the development of sulfonamide-induced (delayed-type) cutaneous drug reactions. The potential application of findings from several related areas of research are also discussed within the context of the pathogenesis of these cutaneous reactions.

SUMMARY

Despite progress, numerous unresolved issues support the testing of novel hypotheses, the search for additional risk factors, and the need for a global approach, including links between laboratory and clinical paradigms. These issues must be addressed if we are to gain an understanding of the mechanistic bases for these cutaneous drug reactions.

Prospective evaluation of risk factors of cutaneous drug reactions to sulfonamides in patients with AIDS

BACKGROUND

Persons with HIV infection have increased rates of drug eruptions.

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to evaluate the risk factors of drug eruptions in response to sulfonamides in patients with AIDS, using a case-control analysis.

METHODS

One hundred thirty-six patients who were hospitalized for pneumocystosis or toxoplasmosis were evaluated at the onset of treatment for various risk factors, which were then compared among patients with (48, 36%) and without (88, 64%) a drug eruption.

RESULTS

In multivariate analysis, high CD8(+) cell count and age less than 36 years indicated a risk of drug eruption (respective odds ratios: 3.5 [95% CI 1.6-7.8], P =.002, and 2.1 [95% CI 1-4.6], P =.06). Markers of viral replication for HIV, Epstein-Barr virus, cytomegalovirus, human herpesvirus 6, and parvovirus B19, slow acetylation phenotype or genotype, and glutathione level were not associated with a risk. Administration of corticosteroids had no preventive effect.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results challenge several current concepts regarding drug eruptions by discarding a strong association with glutathione deficiency, slow acetylation, or active viral infections and by showing no preventive effect of corticosteroids.

Acetylator phenotype and genotype in HIV-infected patients with and without sulfonamide hypersensitivity

Adverse reactions to sulfonamides occur at a higher frequency in patients infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) than noninfected patients. Some studies have suggested that patients with the slow acetylator phenotype are predisposed to these reactions, whereas other studies suggest that the slow acetylator genotype is not a predisposing factor. To rationalize these seemingly contradictory observations, the authors determined the N-acetyltransferase 2 (NAT2) genotype and phenotype in patients with and without a history of hypersensitivity reactions to sulfonamides. HIV-infected patients with a history of a delayed-type hypersensitivity reaction to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole were enrolled, along with a group of AIDS patients with no history of hypersensitivity (delayed or immediate). NAT2 phenotype was determined in both groups using dapsone, while the genotype was determined using a polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism assay. Ten of 14 patients (71%) with a history of hypersensitivity exhibited the slow acetylator phenotype, while 8 of 14 patients (57%) without such a history exhibited this same phenotype (odds ratio [OR] = 1.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.4-9.0; p = 0.69, Fisher's Exact Test). While 9 of 14 patients (64%) with a history of hypersensitivity exhibited a slow acetylator genotype, only 4 of 14 patients (29%) without such a history exhibited this genotype (ns). There were more instances of discordance between deduced and actual phenotype in the nonhypersensitive patients (n = 4) than in the hypersensitive patients (n = 1). The reported higher frequency of the slow acetylator phenotype among patients with a history of hypersensitivity to sulfonamides does not appear to be explained by metabolic changes that would cause discordance between acetylator genotype and phenotype.

Arylamine N-acetyltransferases and drug response

Arylamine N-acetyltransferases (NATs) play an important role in the interaction of competing metabolic pathways determining the fate of and response to xenobiotics as therapeutic drugs, occupational chemicals and carcinogenic substances. Individual susceptibility for drug response and possible adverse drug reactions are modulated by the genetic predisposition (manifested for example, by polymorphisms) and the phenotype of these enzymes. For all drugs metabolized by NATs, the impact of different in vivo enzyme activities is reviewed with regard to therapeutic use, prevention of side effects and possible indications for risk assessment by phenotyping and/or genotyping. As genes of NATs are susceptibility genes for multifactorial adverse effects and xenobiotic-related diseases, risk prediction can only be made possible by taking the complexity of events into consideration.