Ureteroscopic lithotripsy

Optimal management of large proximal ureteral stones (>10 mm): A systematic review and meta-analysis of 12 randomized controlled trials

OBJECTIVES

To develop an evidence base to guide clinicians treating adults with large proximal ureteral stones (LPUS) greater than 10 mm.

METHODS

A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials (RCT) concerning different LPUS management techniques including laparoscopic ureterolithotomy (LU), percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URL) up until March 2020. We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis statement when searching and determining inclusion. All included articles were quality assessed and the data analyses were conducted with Review Manager (5.3).

RESULTS

12 RCTs involving 1416 patients met our eligibility criteria and were analyzed. Of these participants, 44.6% (n = 632) underwent URL, 25.5% (n = 361) PCNL, and 29.9% (n = 423) LU. Pooled analysis revealed that URL had a significantly lower stone-free rate (SFR) compared to PCNL and LU (both with p < 0.05). URL had a significantly higher ureteral injury rate compared to LU (Relative risk (RR) = 5.27, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.52 to 18.22, p = 0.009) and PCNL (RR = 4.11, 95% CI 1.03 to 16.34, p = 0.04). However, no significant differences were found between PCNL and LU in terms of SFR or overall complications, both with p > 0.05. URL initially costs less than PCNL (Weighted mean difference (WMD) -597.35US$, 95% CI -823.10 to -371.60, p < 0.00001), but being less effective creates greater demand for repeat or ancillary treatments compared to LU (RR 15.65, 95% CI 2.11-116.12, p = 0.007) and PCNL (RR 8.86; 95% CI 3.19-24.60; p < 0.00001).

CONCLUSIONS

Both PCNL and LU appear more effective and safer than URL for LPUS; although, LU has higher risk of urine leakage and is more likely incur trauma which requires additional support. However, caution must be taken because this recommendation is based upon a very limited number of clinical studies, and even fewer comparing flexible ureteroscopic technologies. Further prospective real-world studies or RCTs comparing flexible URL, LU and PCNL are required, as well as an in depth analysis of the hidden costs involved in unsuccessful URL treatments.

A Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Pneumatic Lithotripsy and Holmium Laser for Management of Middle and Distal Ureteral Calculi

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety between pneumatic and holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Ho:YAG) laser in the treatment of patients with ureteral stones located in the middle and distal ureter.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a prospective study in recruiting 982 eligible patients from 2009 to 2012. Patients were randomly divided into two groups-the pneumatic lithotripsy (PL) group or the Ho:YAG laser lithotripsy (LL) group. Patient demographics, stone characteristics, intraoperative parameters, and postoperative complications were evaluated and analyzed.

RESULTS

The baseline demographics of patients and stone characteristics were similar in the two groups. The LL group showed significant benefits compared with the PL group in terms of mean operative time (28±9.2 vs 41±12.4 min, P=0.001) and early stone-free rate (80.8% vs 91.3%, P=0.04), but there was no statistically significant difference at the third month (92.6% vs 95.5%, P=0.15). In the LL group, 24 postoperative cases of stricture were seen, whereas only 5 cases occurred in the PL group (P=0.02). The other complications, such as perforation, bleeding, and mucosal injury, were comparable in the two groups. The average postoperative stay was also similar (1.7±2.4 days for PL and 1.5±3.1 days for LL (P=0.62).

CONCLUSION

Both PL and LL are effective in the management of middle and distal impacted stones. Ho:YAG laser has advantages in better efficacy of stone fragmentation and a higher early stone-free rate but seems to have to face the increased risks of postoperative stricture.

Same session bilateral ureteroscopy is safe and efficacious

PURPOSE

Bilateral ureteroscopy can be done in 1 sitting, obviating the need for multiple procedures. We analyzed our experience with same session bilateral ureteroscopy to determine its safety and efficacy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective study of a 9-year period at Emory University Hospital 1,575 consecutive ureteroscopic procedures were done, of which 95 (6.0%) were done as same session bilateral ureteroscopy, thus constituting our study cohort. Bilateral procedures were performed for urolithiasis in 71 cases, urothelial carcinoma in 9, ureteral stricture in 2 and another indication in 13. Patients were followed at least 1 month postoperatively to evaluate procedural success and assess perioperative complications.

RESULTS

Mean age of the 44 male and 40 female patients was 49.8 years. Multiple procedures were done in 9 patients and same session bilateral ureteroscopy was done in 93 of 95 (98%). Intraoperative and postoperative (greater than 1 month) bilateral stone-free rates were 86% and 64%, respectively. The mean change in serum creatinine postoperatively was 0.02 mg/dl (range -0.9 to 1.3). No patient had acute postoperative azotemia. Postoperative complications in 9.7% of patients included pain necessitating an emergency room visit in 4, pyelonephritis/urinary tract infection in 2, and urinary retention, intractable stent pain leading to early removal and urosepsis/death in 1 each.

CONCLUSIONS

Same session bilateral ureteroscopy is efficacious and safe to evaluate and treat upper tract pathology. While most complications are minor, they may be higher than that typically reported for unilateral ureteroscopic procedures.

Holmium laser lithothripsy of ureteral calculi: our initial experience

AIM

To evaluate effectiveness and safety of intracorporeal holmium:YAG (Ho:YAG) laser lithotripsy of ureteral calculi.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between October 2003 and September 2005, 45 patients (age range 27-74, mean age 51.5 years) with 49 ureteral stones (measuring 4-28 mm in size) were treated with Ho:YAG laser lithotripsy. The locations of the stones in the ureter were: 6 in the upper third, 7 in the middle third, and 36 in the lower third. Under general anaesthesia, we used semirigid 9- to 11-Fr ureteroscopes and a flexible 7.5-Fr ureteroscope. The Ho:YAG laser had a maximum power of 1.8 J at 8 Hz, and a 365-mum flexible quartz fibre was used. One month postoperatively the patients were followed up with imaging tests.

RESULTS

Stone disintegration was feasible in all cases. The mean hospital stay was 2.8 days. One month postoperatively, stone-free status was revealed in 93.3% of the cases. Only minor complications were noted in 4 patients (8.8%). No long-term complications were recorded.

CONCLUSION

Ho:YAG laser lithotripsy of ureteral calculi is a feasible, safe, and effective procedure.

When is open ureterolithotomy indicated for the treatment of ureteral stones?

AIM

Improvements in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) and ureteroscopy have almost eradicated the need for open surgery in ureteral stones. The aim of this study was to assess characteristics of patients who underwent open ureterolithotomy.

METHODS

During a 5-year period, a total of 654 patients with ureteral stones were treated. Initial management consisted of ureteroscopy in 524 patients, ESWL in 62 patients and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in 12 patients. Open surgery was performed in 56 patients. Stone location, size and success rates were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

Ureteroscopy resulted in successful stone removal in 94%, 98% and 98.5% of proximal, mid and distal ureteral stones, respectively. A total of 14 patients with ureteroscopy failure were referred for open surgery. ESWL treatment resulted in success in 55 patients (88%), and those with ESWL failure were referred for either ureteroscopy (n = 3) or open surgery (n = 4). Open surgery was performed in a total of 56 patients, 38 of whom had been referred from other centers. Stone location was proximal ureter in 25 (44.6%) patients (stone size: 2-12 cm(2)), mid ureter in five (8.9%) patients (stone size: 2-6 cm(2)) and distal ureter in 26 (46.4%) patients (stone size: 4-9 cm(2)). A history of previous unsuccessful endourological procedure was observed in 33 (58%) of 56 patients. Children under age 16 (range 1-15 years) comprised 17.8% of patients undergoing open surgery.

CONCLUSION

Open surgery, which is nowadays being replaced with laparoscopic techniques, is generally indicated for failed endourological procedures (58%), particularly in centers that do not have flexible ureteroscopy or laser lithotriptor, and in patients with larger stones (>3 cm). Children (17.8%) are also candidates for open surgery, if specifically designed endourological equipment is not available.

Ureterorenoskopie (URS) bei Harnsteinen

Distal ureteral calculi (<5 mm) usually pass the ureter spontaneously. Ureteroscopic lithotripsy of distal ureteral calculi shows high stone-free rates with a low complication rate (4%) and is equal to extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL), while ESWL is the primary choice for proximal ureteric stones. Flexible endoscopes are more difficult to handle and should be used only under fluoroscopic control. They are generally used in combination with the holmium:YAG laser and the flexible Lithoclast in the proximal ureter or the renal collecting system. Overall the complication rate of URS is 9-11% with avulsion of the ureteric urothelium being the most common complication. Ureteral perforation, stricture (<1%), impaction of the instrument in the ureter with consequent ureteral laceration, extravasation of stones, and bleeding in the urogenital tract are complications of URS but are minimal in the hands of a well-trained and skilled surgeon.

The evolution of ureteroscopy: a modern single-institution series

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate a modern ureteroscopy series, including the use of new technological advances, operative procedures, and potential complications, at a single institution and to compare our current experience with our prior published series and the current literature.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 1000 consecutive ureteroscopies performed in 961 patients from December 1999 to February 2003 at our institution.

RESULTS

Semirigid and flexible ureteroscopes were used in 60.3% and 37.0% of the cases, respectively. In 2.6% of cases, a combination of both rigid and flexible ureteroscopes was required. The most common indications for ureteroscopy were as follows: stone, 57.9%; diagnostic, 20.6%; and urothelial carcinoma, 12.6%. Of the stones treated, 31.8% were proximal or middle and 59.1% distal. The overall, proximal, and distal stone-free rates were 91.7%, 87.3%, and 94.2%, respectively. Average operative time was 81 minutes (range, 5-280 minutes). Average follow-up was 2.36 months (range, 1-24 months). The overall complication rate was 1.9% (18/961), including a 0.2% (2/961) incidence of ureteral strictures.

CONCLUSION

Current practice trends have shifted to an increased use of flexible ureteroscopes and more frequent ureteroscopic treatment of proximal calculi. Our single treatment stone-free rates are competitive with quoted shock wave lithotripsy success. In addition, there has been a decrease in ureteroscopic-associated complications in our series, with no ureteral avulsions. The improvements in treatment success and decrease in complications may be secondary to advances in ureteroscopic technology.

Percutaneous antegrade removal of impacted upper-ureteral calculi: still the treatment of choice in developing countries

PURPOSE

To assess the safety and efficacy of antegrade percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) of large impacted proximal-ureteral calculi.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between July 1998 and October 2003, a total of 66 patients (43 male and 23 female; mean age 37.5 years) underwent PCNL for impacted proximal-ureteral calculi. The inclusion criteria were calculi >15 mm that were densely impacted and located between the ureteropelvic junction and the lower border of the 4th lumbar vertebra. The mean drop in hemoglobin, operating time, analgesic requirement, and hospital stay were assessed.

RESULTS

Sixty-five patients (98.5%) had complete calculus clearance in a single session through a single tract. The mean operating time and hospital stay were 47 minutes and 46 hours, respectively. The mean analgesic requirement was 65 mg of pethidine (meperidine). The mean follow-up was 14 months. There were no significant postoperative complications.

CONCLUSION

Antegrade PCNL is a safe and effective option for large, impacted proximal-ureteral calculi.

Management of ureteric stones

The contemporary management of ureteric stones is reviewed and evidence based recommendations about treatment are made. Stones measuring less than 4mm in diameter have a high chance of spontaneous passage and the main debate for optimum treatment of larger stones centres around the choice of shock wave lithotripsy or endoscopic management combined with laser fragmentation. Treatment recommendations should be based on patient preference, published evidence, local audit (surgeon expertise and availability of equipment) and cost. Artificial Neural Networks could become a useful tool for prediction of treatment outcome for ureteric stones, and further research is needed to clarify this potential. ESWL is less effective than ureteroscopy but it may prevent the need for more invasive treatment in a substantial proportion of patients. It should only be considered as initial treatment in patients with stones less than 10mm in size. The routine use of stents should be avoided as both fragmentation and stone free rates are noticeably lower. For larger stones, initial laser ureteroscopy serves better both for proximal or distal calculi and is more cost-efficient. Provided that no contraindications for general anaesthesia exist, laser ureterolithotripsy should be regarded as an excellent first line treatment modality for ureteric stone especially in greater stone burden. In the best hands, the outcome for endoscopic management of ureteric stone in all sites is better than ESWL and is cheaper, although equipment, expertise and experience are all required to achieve this superior outcome.

Evaluation of the patient with flank pain and possible ureteral calculus

Flank pain due to urolithiasis is a common problem in patients presenting to emergency departments. Radiology plays a vital role in the work-up of these patients. Many modalities can be used, including ultrasonography, nuclear medicine, and the traditionally used techniques of intravenous urography and conventional radiography. The development of nonenhanced computed tomography (CT) (single- or multi-detector row helical) has provided a means to enable detection and characterization of urolithiasis with unprecedented sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy while yielding important information for treatment planning, including the size and location of calculi. This technique can also help detect causes for flank pain outside the genitourinary tract. However, close attention must be paid to all aspects of the CT study to prevent misdiagnoses.

Ureteroscopy and holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy: an emerging definitive management strategy for symptomatic ureteral calculi in pregnancy

OBJECTIVES

To review the results of holmium laser lithotripsy in a cohort of patients who presented with symptomatic urolithiasis in pregnancy. Symptomatic urolithiasis in pregnancy that does not respond to conservative measures has traditionally been managed with ureteral stent insertion or percutaneous nephrostomy. Holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (YAG) laser lithotripsy using state-of-the-art ureteroscopes represents an emerging strategy for definitive stone management in pregnancy.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted at two tertiary stone centers from January 1996 to August 2001 to identify pregnant patients who were treated with ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy for symptomatic urolithiasis or encrusted stents. Eight patients with a total of 10 symptomatic ureteral calculi and two encrusted ureteral stents were treated. The mean gestational age at presentation was 22 weeks. The mean stone size was 8.1 mm. The stones were located in the proximal ureter/ureteropelvic junction (n = 3), midureter (n = 1), and distal ureter (n = 6).

RESULTS

Complete stone fragmentation and/or removal of encrusted ureteral stents were achieved in all patients using the holmium:YAG laser. The overall procedural success rate was 91%. The overall stone-free rate was 89%. No obstetric or urologic complications were encountered.

CONCLUSIONS

Ureteroscopy and holmium laser lithotripsy can be performed safely in all stages of pregnancy, providing definitive management of symptomatic ureteral calculi. The procedure can be done with minimal or no fluoroscopy and avoids the undesirable features of stents or nephrostomy tubes.

[Ureteral lithiasis, what treatment?]

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy are minimal invasive techniques, both of which have definitively become essential for the treatment of ureteral stones resistant to conservative treatment. At the time of evidence-based medicine, no study makes it possible to recommend one of these methods rather than the other. For stones of identical size and location, this review of the literature shows that extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy prove of comparable effectiveness and innocuousness. The urologist thus has two alternatives of which the technical control, the availability of the endoscopes or lithotriptors as well as the desire and comfort of the patients are the factors which condition his choice of the method for the treatment of ureteral stones.

Does laparoscopic ureterolithotomy replace shock-wave lithotripsy or ureteroscopy for ureteral stones?

Ureteral stones are a major cause of morbidity and anxiety among urologic patients. Before the 1980s, ureteral stones were managed by open ureterolithotomy. Since then, second- and third-generation shock-wave lithotriptors, small-caliber ureteroscopes, and laparoscopic procedures have evolved as options for the treatment of ureteral calculi. Each technique is highly effective when implemented for the appropriate indication. Stone size, location, composition, and surgeon's and patient's preferences each play a major role in the decision-making process. Currently, ureteroscopy and shock-wave lithotripsy are regarded by many as the first-line treatment modalities for the management of ureteral stones, and the exact role of laparoscopic ureterolithotomy remains poorly defined. The present review addresses the most recent literature, and highlights the advantages and disadvantages of each surgical option.