Initial Resuscitation After Burn Injury: Therapies, Strategies, and Controversies:

The Use of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Burns: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Burns are among the leading causes of trauma worldwide, and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a common cause of death in burn patients. Some patients develop hypoxemia refractory to conventional therapies and may be initiated on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) as rescue therapy. We conducted a meta-analysis for studies reporting on survival rates of patients receiving ECMO for burns or inhalation injuries, which was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included the hospital and intensive care unit length of stay and duration of ECMO. Random-effects (DerSimonian and Laird) were conducted. The pooled survival from 10 studies was 53.6% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 37.6-69.2%, high certainty). Survival was significantly associated with age (regression coefficient [B]: -0.0088, 95% CI: -0.0155 to -0.0021, p = 0.011) and the proportion of male patients (B: -1.0137 95% CI: -1.9695 to -0.0580, p = 0.038). Patients were cannulated on ECMO for a mean of 8.4 days (95% CI: 6.1-10.7) and remained in the ICU for a mean of 40.4 days (95% CI: 11.4-69.3). Mean hospital length of stay was 45.4 days (95% CI: 31.7-59.0). In conclusion, patients with burn and inhalation injuries who develop ARDS refractory to conservative management have a survival rate of 54% when placed on ECMO.

Trend Analysis of Current Modalities for Monitoring Fluid Therapy in Patients With Large Burns: Echoing the Call for Better Resuscitation Indices

The aim of this study was to investigate whether current standards at our institution have effectively monitored resuscitations of severely burned patients during the first 48 hours postburn. Demographics, injuries assessed by TBSA and full thickness (FT), and resuscitation volumes (lactated Ringer's [LR]) were compared for all patients and those who died or survived. Means and standard deviations of hourly indices (urinary output [UOP], lactate [LAC], base excess [BE]) vs LR were analyzed. Waveforms, four-quadrant concordance, and correlation were also employed to compare the trending abilities (hourly changes [∆]) of aforementioned variables vs LR. A total of 203 patients were included in the analysis. Of these patients, 71 (35%) died, and 50 (25%) had inhalation injuries. Mean age and weight were 47 ± 19 years and 87 ± 18 kg, respectively. Mean TBSA burned was 41 ± 20%, with a mean FT of 18 ± 24%. Importantly, normalized waveform plots demonstrated the inability of UO, LAC, and BE to follow hourly changes in LR. Correlation of these variables was weak (r>>-1). This was confirmed by concordance plots. Slopes in all groups demonstrated that UOP was a better resuscitative monitor than LAC or BE. ∆UOP responded to ∆LR better in patients who survived than died. Reliance on hourly UOP as the sole index of optimal resuscitation is not supported. This study echoed the call for better resuscitation indices.

High-Dose Ascorbic Acid for Burn Shock Resuscitation May Not Improve Outcomes

High dose ascorbic acid (HDAA) has been touted to ameliorate inflammation and reduce fluid requirements during burn shock resuscitation (BSR). Whether this leads to improved outcomes is not known. The authors' aim for this study was to compare ventilator days, ventilator-associated pneumonia, and mortality between patients who did and did not receive HDAA during BSR.The authors performed a retrospective case control study from 2012 to 2015. They identified 38 patients (HDAA) who received HDAA during BSR. Using age and %TBSA, the authors identified and matched 42 control patients (CTL) who did not receive HDAA for BSR during that same time period. The authors collected data for age, %TBSA, hospital days (LOS), ventilator days (VENT), inhalation injury (INH), ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), and mortality (MORT).There were no differences in age and %TBSA or %TBSA of third-degree burn injury between groups. There was no significant difference in the incidence of INH (HDAA-52% vs CTL-36%, P = .17) and the groups had similar LOS and VENT. Additionally, there was no significant difference in VAP incidence (HDAA-29% vs CTL-14%, P = .13) or mortality (HDAA-26% vs CTL-23%, P = .8). HDAA patients had a numerically higher incidence of acute renal failure requiring dialysis (23 vs 7%, P = .06) which was confirmed in a multivariate analysis (odds ratio 5.4; 95% confidence interval 1.1-26). HDAA, while potentially reducing inflammation and fluid requirements during BSR, may not improve any meaningful outcomes such as ventilator requirements, ventilator-associated pneumonia, and mortality.

Correlation between invasive and noninvasive blood pressure measurements in severely burned children

INTRODUCTION

Accurate blood pressure monitoring is essential for burn management, with the intra-arterial line method being the gold standard. Here we evaluated agreement between cuff and intra-arterial line methods.

METHODS

Data from burned children admitted from 1997 to 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Simultaneously collected intra-arterial and cuff measurements were cross-matched and linear regression performed to assess agreement for systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and mean arterial pressure (MAP).

RESULTS

We identified 9969 matches for SBP, DBP, and MAP in 872 patients (579 male) aged 8±5years with burns covering 52±20% of the total body surface area and a hospitalization lasting 33±31 days. Intra-arterial lines had a complication rate of 1%. The mean bias (95% CI) between methods was 1.3 (0.5, 2.1) mm Hg for SBP, -6.4 (-7.0, -5.7) mmHg for DBP, and -5.8 (-6.4, -5.3) mmHg for MAP. The standard deviation of the bias (95% limit of agreement) was 12.1 (-22.5, 25.1) mmHg for SBP, 9.9 (-25.8, 13.0) mmHg for DBP, and 8.7 (-22.8, 11.1) mmHg for MAP.

CONCLUSIONS

Cuff measurements vary widely from those of intra-arterial lines, which have a low complication rate. Intra-arterial lines are advisable when tight control of the hemodynamic response is essential.

Monitoring End Points of Burn Resuscitation

This article discusses commonly used methods of monitoring and determining the end points of resuscitation. Each end point of resuscitation is examined as it relates to use in critically ill burn patients. Published medical literature, clinical trials, consensus trials, and expert opinion regarding end points of resuscitation were gathered and reviewed. Specific goals were a detailed examination of each method in the critical care population and how this methodology can be used in the burn patient. Although burn resuscitation is monitored and administered using the methodology as seen in medical/surgical intensive care settings, special consideration for excessive edema formation, metabolic derangements, and frequent operative interventions must be considered.

Photographic assessment of burn wounds: a simple strategy in a resource-poor setting

OBJECTIVE

To validate the use of photographic burn wound assessment in evaluation of burn size and wound characteristics.

METHODS

Feasibility study of agreement between methods of measurement of burn size and characteristics, in patients admitted to the burn unit at Kamuzu Central Hospital (KCH), Malawi, over two months in 2011. Burn wounds were photographed and assessed clinically, concurrently, by an experienced clinician. Photographs reviewed by two blinded burn clinicians after 4-6 weeks. Correlation between clinical assessment and photographic evaluation was calculated using kappa score and Pearson's correlation coefficient.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine patients were included in evaluation of TBSA, and fifty wounds assessed for their characteristics. Pearson's correlation coefficient for agreement of TBSA between clinical exam and photograph review by expert#1, and #2, was 0.96, 0.93 (p<0.001), respectively. Pearson's correlation coefficients comparing expert#1 and #2 to the gold standard were: proportion of full-thickness burn (0.88 and 0.81, p<0.001), and epithelialized superficial burn (0.89 and 0.55, p<0.001). Kappa scores were significant for wound evolution (expert#1 0.57, expert#2 0.64, p<0.001), and prognosis (expert#1 0.80, expert#2 0.80, p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Burn assessment with digital photography is a valid and affordable alternative to direct clinical exam, alleviating access issues to burn care in developing countries.

[Estimation of substitution volume after burn trauma. Systematic review of published formulae]

BACKGROUND

Fluid resuscitation after severe burns remains a challenging task particularly in the preclinical and early clinical phases. To facilitate volume substitution after burn trauma several formulae have been published and evaluated, nevertheless, the optimal formula has not yet been identified.

METHODS

A systematic PubMed search was performed to identify published formulae for fluid resuscitation after severe burns. The search terms "burn", "thermal", "treatment", "therapy" or "resuscitation", "fluid", "formula" and "adult", "pediatric" or "paediatric" were used in various combinations. Analysis was limited to the period from 01.01.1950 to 30.06.2010 and database entries in PubMed (http://www.pubmed.com). Additionally, references cited in the papers were analyzed and relevant publications were also included. Publications and formulae were assessed and classified by two independent investigators.

RESULTS

Within the specified time frame eight publications (five original contributions and three book chapters) were identified of which three formulae recommended colloid solutions, four recommended electrolyte solutions and one suggested hypertonic solutions within the first 24 h for fluid resuscitation. Only one formula specifically dealt with fluid resuscitation in infants.

CONCLUSION

The identified formulae led to sometimes strikingly diverse calculations of resuscitation fluid volumes. Therefore their use should be monitored closely and clinical values included. Urine output is a well established individual parameter. Use of colloid and hypertonic solutions leads to a reduced total fluid volume but is still controversially discussed.

Critical care of the burn patient: the first 48 hours

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this concise review is to provide an overview of some of the most important resuscitation and monitoring issues and approaches that are unique to burn patients compared with the general intensive care unit population.

STUDY SELECTION

Consensus conference findings, clinical trials, and expert medical opinion regarding care of the critically burned patient were gathered and reviewed. Studies focusing on burn shock, resuscitation goals, monitoring tools, and current recommendations for initial burn care were examined.

CONCLUSIONS

The critically burned patient differs from other critically ill patients in many ways, the most important being the necessity of a team approach to patient care. The burn patient is best cared for in a dedicated burn center where resuscitation and monitoring concentrate on the pathophysiology of burns, inhalation injury, and edema formation. Early operative intervention and wound closure, metabolic interventions, early enteral nutrition, and intensive glucose control have led to continued improvements in outcome. Prevention of complications such as hypothermia and compartment syndromes is part of burn critical care. The myriad areas where standards and guidelines are currently determined only by expert opinion will become driven by level 1 data only by continued research into the critical care of the burn patient.

CT of Nontraumatic Abdominal Fluid Collections After Initial Fluid Resuscitation of Patients with Major Burns

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to describe the presence and CT distribution of nontraumatic fluid collections and edema in the abdomen and pelvis after initial fluid resuscitation of patients with major (>/==" BORDER="0"> 25% total body surface area) thermal burns.

CONCLUSION

Awareness of the presence and expected CT distribution of nontraumatic fluid after initial fluid resuscitation in patients with major burns can assist the radiologist in differentiating such collections from those caused by mechanical trauma.

Trends in burn resuscitation: shifting the focus from fluids to adequate endpoint monitoring, edema control, and adjuvant therapies

Bum shock is a complex process involving a series of intertwined physiologic responses to injury that require more rigorous intervention than simply a change in fluid tonicity, fluid composition, or fluid resuscitation volume. Controversy ensues over monitoring techniques and resuscitation goals, in part because the identification of true markers of perfusion is clouded by intradependence of endpoints on other metabolic processes. The persistence of cellular hypoperfusion in patients who have been deemed adequately resuscitated by global indices supports the growing realization that failure of conventional endpoint-monitoring strategies to detect compensated bum shock can lead to significant organ injury from SIRS or MODS. Current endpoints should be interpreted in the aggregate, because none have yet been demonstrated to reflect tissue perfusion status independently and accurately. Numerous technologically advanced endpoints to predict patient outcome, which may be useful in determining futility of treatment or end-of-life decisions, are now available. Still lack-ing, however, is a reliable tool proven to improve outcome that can guide bum shock resuscitation therapies successfully. Exciting new research in tissue oxygenation and perfusion has revealed that damaging mediator cascades and irreversible microvascular changes may preclude complete resolution of bum shock solely through restoration of oxygen delivery. Because bum patients now frequently survive the early resuscitation phase. the focus should be on controlling derangements in oxygen use and correcting occult hypoperfusion to reduce later adverse patient outcomes from SIRS, sepsis, and MODS. Bum-specific research on resuscitation endpoints and monitoring strategies lags behind research in other patient populations. Present standards and monitoring guidelines for bum shock resuscitation should be critically evaluated and based on true, scientifically validated data rather than on observational studies or personal beliefs. Thus the continuing challenge for clinicians and researchers:burn centers must collaborate to perform large, multi-center studies to evaluate critically and to prove resuscitation endpoints and therapies. Future technologies targeted at microcirculatory perfusion and cellular oxygenation offer an exciting promise for less invasive, easily accessible, more accurate endpoints and treatments for bum shock resuscitation.

Inhalation injury in the burn patient

Patients who survive to hospital admission after bums with inhalation injury face a difficult and potentially prolonged course of treatment in the burn center. Continuing survival and especially functional outcome hinges on the patient's receiving comprehensive, well-coordinated care from an interdisciplinary team of skilled health care providers. The best care plan combines close monitoring of vital organ/tissue perfusion indicators, aggressive management of pulmonary compromise, and scrupulous attention to all details of nursing care. Many patients suffer complications from their injuries or treatment, and not all survive. Those who do may face prolonged and painful therapies on the way to recovery. The expert nurse managing and caring for this unfortunate population faces tremendous clinical challenges but also has the opportunity and satisfaction of helping each patient achieve the best possible outcome.