Induction paclitaxel, carboplatin, and infusional 5-FU followed by concurrent radiation therapy and weekly paclitaxel/carboplatin in the treatment of locally advanced head and neck cancer: a phase II trial of the Minnie Pearl Cancer Research Network

Comparative Efficacy of Chinese Herbal Injections Combined with Paclitaxel Plus Cisplatin for Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Multidimensional Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Considering the limitations of pure paclitaxel plus cisplatin chemotherapy in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer and the extensive exploration of Chinese herbal injections, this study performed a multidimensional network meta-analysis to systematically evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of 12 Chinese herbal injections in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials were obtained from several databases according to the eligibility criteria, and the study quality was assessed by the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Data analysis was performed by Stata 13.1 software and WinBUGS 14.0 software. Multidimensional cluster analysis was performed with the "scatterplot3d" package in R 3.6.1 software (PROSPERO ID: CRD42020163503).

RESULTS

A total of 58 eligible randomized controlled trials involving 4578 patients and 12 Chinese herbal injections were included. Combined with paclitaxel plus cisplatin chemotherapy, Xiaoaiping injection exhibited a better impact on the clinical effective rate than paclitaxel plus cisplatin alone. Shenqifuzheng injection was associated with a preferable response in performance status and reduced leukopenia and gastrointestinal reactions. Kangai injection was dominant in the comprehensive results of the cluster analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Chinese herbal injections combined with paclitaxel plus cisplatin chemotherapy have a certain adjuvant effect in treating non-small-cell lung cancer, but the results of this study need to be verified by more well-designed, large-sample, multicenter randomized controlled trials.

Comparison of carboplatin-paclitaxel to docetaxel-cisplatin-5-flurouracil induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiation for locally advanced head and neck cancer

OBJECTIVES

In head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (TPF) has become an accepted induction chemotherapy regimen. However, carboplatin-paclitaxel (CT) regimens have shown comparable outcomes. Here, we compared the outcomes of patients treated with either TPF or CT as induction chemotherapy followed by definitive chemoradiation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We performed a single-institution retrospective analysis of patients with Stage III-IV HNSCC. From a database of 803 patients, we identified 143 patients treated with TPF or CT induction chemotherapy between 1999 and 2012.

RESULTS

53 patients and 90 patients received TPF or CT induction chemotherapy, respectively. The median follow-up was 18.9 months. The 1 year locoregional control was 80.5% for CT compared to 55.5% for TPF (HR 0.32, P=.0002). The 1 year progression free survival was 73.2% for CT compared to 60.7% for TPF (HR 0.57; P=.02). On multivariable analysis, CT remained significant for LRC (HR 0.28; P=0.04). TPF induction chemotherapy was associated with worse renal toxicity as measured by peak creatinine increases during induction chemotherapy (P=0.001). TPF was also associated with a trend toward more chemotherapy dose reductions or changes in systemic agents during concurrent chemoradiation (43.4% for TPF vs. 27.8% for CT; P=0.06).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to TPF induction chemotherapy, CT induction chemotherapy had at least similar if not better LRC and PFS in patients while having less renal toxicity. Thus, CT induction chemotherapy may benefit patients with locally advanced HNSCC by facilitating adequate chemoradiation regimens that enhanced disease control.

Combining Bevacizumab with Radiation or Chemoradiation for Solid Tumors: A Review of the Scientific Rationale, and Clinical Trials

Radiation therapy or the combination of radiation and chemotherapy is an important component in the local control of many tumor types including glioblastoma, rectal cancer, and pancreatic cancer. The addition of anti-angiogenic agents to chemotherapy is now standard treatment for a variety of metastatic cancers including colorectal cancer and non-squamous cell lung cancer. Anti-angiogenic agents can increase the efficacy of radiation or chemoradiation for primary tumors through mechanisms such as vascular normalization and augmentation of endothelial cell injury. The most commonly used anti-angiogenic drug, bevacizumab, is a humanized monoclonal antibody that binds and neutralizes vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A). Dozens of preclinical studies nearly uniformly demonstrate that inhibition of VEGF-A or its receptors potentiates the effects of radiation therapy against solid tumors, and this potentiation is generally independent of the type or schedule of radiation and timing of VEGF-A inhibitor delivery. There are now several clinical trials combining bevacizumab with radiation or chemoradiation for the local control of various primary, recurrent, and metastatic tumors, and many of these early trials show encouraging results. Some added toxicities occur with the delivery of bevacizumab but common toxicities such as hypertension and proteinuria are generally easily managed while severe toxicities are rare. In the future, bevacizumab and other anti-angiogenic agents may become common additions to radiation and chemoradiation regimens for tumors that are difficult to locally control.

Integrating systemic agents into multimodality treatment of locally advanced head and neck cancer

Although highly debated in the 1980s, randomized clinical trials have provided undeniable evidence that systemic chemotherapy, as part of a multimodality treatment collaboration, is effective in improving survival, organ preservation and local-regional control in locally advanced head and neck cancer (HNC). We are entering an exciting period in which new chemotherapy agents, new paradigms of treatment, new surgical and radiation technology, and new prognostic factors are rapidly becoming available. Information on how to integrate these new tools and on how they affect long-term outcomes are lacking, making decision making and treatment planning more difficult. With unprecedented survival and the changing demographics of HNC we must now consider long-term consequences in addition to survival and local and regional control as important factors in therapeutic decision making. The availability of different treatment plans that incorporate systemic chemotherapy, radiotherapy and surgery give us many tools with which to craft a treatment for each individual patient. Today, in this exciting and chaotic period, a multidisciplinary and collaborative approach for each HNC patient at the start of decision making and planning is a necessity and the absolute standard of medical treatment for excellent patient care.

Concomitant chemoradiotherapy using low-dose weekly gemcitabine versus low-dose weekly paclitaxel in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a phase III study

The objective of this study was to compare concomitant chemoradiotherapy based on weekly low-dose gemcitabine versus weekly low-dose paclitaxel in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Previously, untreated patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck were randomly assigned to one of the two concomitant chemoradiation regimens: (1) weekly gemcitabine at a dose of 100 mg/m(2) over 30 min 1-2 h before radiotherapy and (2) weekly paclitaxal at a dose of 20 mg/m(2) over 60 min 4-6 h before radiotherapy. The planned radiotherapy dose was 65 Gy over 6.5 weeks in 32 settings. Two hundred and sixteen patients were randomly divided into 2 groups: group A (110 patients) and group B (106 patients) who received concomitant weekly low-dose gemcitabine and low-dose paclitaxal, respectively, with the radiotherapy protocol. The hematological toxicity was generally mild. On the contrary, non-hematologic toxicities were severe. Grade III mucositis occurred in 36% in group A and in 24% in group B (P = 0.04). Moreover, grade III dermatitis were encountered in 24% in group A and 13% in group B (P = 0.049). Thirty-two (29%) of group A and 18(17%) of group B patients required enteral or parenteral feeding (P = 0.01). Sixteen (15%) of group A and 6 (6%) of group B required enteral or parenteral feeding that lasted for 6 months (P = 0.03). Regarding the late effect on swallowing, 8% of patients in group A and 2% of patients in group B required enteral or parenteral feeding for more than 6 months (P = 0.035). Response rates were 78 and 89% in groups A and B, respectively (P = 0.038). The 2-year progression-free survival figures were 54 and 64% of groups A and B, respectively; however, the 2-year overall survival figures were 56 and 67%, respectively. On the other hand, the 3-year progression-free survival figures were 39 and 48% for groups A and B, respectively, while the 3-year overall survival figures were 45 and 49%, respectively (P = 0.05). Both concomitant chemoradiotherapy regimens were easily given in the outpatient clinic. The regimen based on paclitaxel was significantly more tolerable and effective; however, the difference was not enormous.

The effect of radiotherapy on NKT cells in patients with advanced head and neck cancer

BACKGROUND

Cancer immunotherapy with NKT cells is a potential new treatment strategy for advanced head and neck cancer. NKT cell therapy is promising due to its unique anti-tumor activity and higher degree of safety compared to current therapies. Radiotherapy is indispensable as a standard treatment for advanced head and neck cancer. To elucidate the possibility of using NKT cells as an adjuvant immunotherapy with radiotherapy, we examined the effect of radiotherapy on NKT cells in patients with head and neck cancer.

METHODS

The number, IFN-gamma production and proliferation capacity of NKT cells were analyzed before and after 50 Gy radiation therapy in 12 patients with stage IV head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. The cytotoxic activity of NKT cells was examined in vitro.

RESULTS

The number of NKT cells in the blood varied widely between patients. After radiation therapy, the population of CD3 T cells decreased significantly, while the NKT cell population remained stable. The number of NKT cells was the same after radiation therapy as before. IFN-gamma production from NKT cells collected just after radiotherapy was impaired after stimulation with exogenous ligand, but the proliferative responses of these NKT cells was enhanced in comparison to those collected before radiation therapy. Furthermore, the proliferated NKT cells displayed a significant level of anti-tumor activity.

CONCLUSION

NKT cells are relatively resistant to radiation and might therefore be suitable for adjuvant immunotherapy to eradicate remnant cancer cells in patients who have undergone radiation therapy.

Usefulness of interim FDG-PET after induction chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck receiving sequential induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy

PURPOSE

Induction chemotherapy (ICT) has been used to select patients for organ preservation and determine subsequent treatments in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (LASCCHN). Still, the clinical outcomes of LASCCHN patients who showed response to ICT are heterogeneous. We evaluated the efficacy of interim 18-fluoro-2-deoxy-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) after ICT in this specific subgroup of LASCCHN patients who achieved partial response (PR) after ICT to predict clinical outcomes after concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Twenty-one patients with LASCCHN who showed PR to ICT by Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors before definitive CCRT were chosen in this retrospective analysis. FDG-PET was performed before and 2-4 weeks after ICT to assess the extent of disease at baseline and the metabolic response to ICT, respectively. We examined the correlation of the metabolic response by the percentage decrease of maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) on the primary tumor or lymph node after ICT or a specific threshold of SUVmax on interim FDG-PET with clinical outcomes including complete response (CR) rate to CCRT, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

A SUVmax of 4.8 on interim FDG-PET could predict clinical CR after CCRT (100% vs. 20%, p=0.001), PFS (median, not reached vs. 8.5 mo, p<0.001), and OS (median, not reached vs. 12.0 months, p=0.001) with a median follow-up of 20.3 months in surviving patients. A 65% decrease in SUVmax after ICT from baseline also could predict clinical CR after CCRT (100% vs. 33.3%, p=0.003), PFS (median, not reached vs. 8.9 months, p<0.001) and OS (median, not reached vs. 24.4 months, p=0.001) of the patients.

CONCLUSION

These data suggest that interim FDG-PET after ICT might be a useful determinant to predict clinical outcomes in patients with LASCCHN receiving sequential ICT followed by CCRT.

A systematic review of dental disease in patients undergoing cancer therapy

INTRODUCTION

This purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the literature and update our current understanding of the impact of present cancer therapies on the dental apparatus (teeth and periodontium) since the 1989 NIH Development Consensus Conference on the Oral Complications of Cancer Therapies.

REVIEW METHOD

A systematic literature search was conducted with assistance from a research librarian in the databases MEDLINE/PubMed and EMBASE for articles published between 1 January 1990 and 31 December 2008. Each study was independently assessed by two reviewers. Taking into account predetermined quality measures, a weighted prevalence was calculated for the prevalence of dental caries, severe gingival disease, and dental infection. Data on DMFT/dmft, DMFS/dmfs, plaque, and gingival indexes were also gathered. The level of evidence, recommendation, and guideline (if possible) were given for published preventive and management strategies.

RESULTS

Sixty-four published papers between 1990 and 2008 were reviewed. The weighted overall prevalence of dental caries was 28.1%. The overall DMFT for patients who were post-antineoplastic therapy was 9.19 (SD, 7.98; n = 457). The overall plaque index for patients who were post-antineoplastic therapy was 1.38 (SD, 0.25; n = 189). The GI for patients who were post-chemotherapy was 1.02 (SD, 0.15; n = 162). The weighted prevalence of dental infections/abscess during chemotherapy was reported in three studies and was 5.8%.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who were post-radiotherapy had the highest DMFT. The use of fluoride products and chlorhexidine rinses are beneficial in patients who are post-radiotherapy. There continues to be lack of clinical studies on the extent and severity of dental disease that are associated with infectious complications during cancer therapy.

A systematic review of orofacial pain in patients receiving cancer therapy

PURPOSE

We present the findings of a structured systematic review of the literature assessing orofacial pain induced by malignant disease and/or its therapy (excluding mucositis). This evaluation of the literature published after the 1989 NIH Development Consensus conference on the oral complications of cancer therapies is an effort to assess the prevalence of pain, quality of life and economic impact, and management strategies for cancer therapy-induced orofacial pain.

METHODS

A systematic medical literature search was conducted with assistance from a research librarian in MEDLINE/PubMed and EMBASE databases for articles published between January 1, 1990 and December 31, 2008. Each study was independently assessed by two reviewers with expertise in the field of oral oncology.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine studies assessed pain in the head and neck region. The measure was commonly embedded in quality of life studies. Most of these studies described pain in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients, which therefore became the focus of the report. Pain is common in patients with HNC and is reported by approximately half of patients prior to cancer therapy, 81% during therapy, 70% at the end of therapy, and by 36% at 6 months after treatment. Pain is experienced beyond the 6-month period by approximately one third of patients and is typically more severe than pre-treatment cancer-induced pain.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review identified the presence of pain before cancer therapy, likely attributable to the cancer; an increase in pain during therapy and the common persistence of pain following cancer treatment. Continuing research should use validated tools to prospectively assess orofacial pain, its causes and pathophysiology, and its effect on quality of life and economic impact. Clinical trials of pain management in this setting are also warranted.

A systematic review of dysgeusia induced by cancer therapies

PURPOSE

The purpose was to review relevant scientific papers written since 1989 which focused on the prevalence and management of dysgeusia as an oral side effect of cancer treatment.

METHODS

Our literature search was limited to English language papers published between 1990 and 2008. A total of 30 papers were reviewed; the results of 26 of these papers were included in the present systematic review. A structured assessment form was used by two reviewers for each paper. Studies were weighted as to the quality of the study design, and treatment recommendations were based on the relative strength of each paper.

RESULTS

A wide range in reported prevalence of dysgeusia was identified with the weighted prevalence from 56-76%, depending on the type of cancer treatment. Attempts to prevent dysgeusia through the prophylactic use of zinc sulfate or amifostine have been of limited benefit. Nutritional counseling may be helpful to some patients in minimizing the symptoms of dysgeusia.

CONCLUSIONS

Dysgeusia is a common oral side effect of cancer therapy (radiotherapy, chemotherapy, or combined modality therapy) and often impacts negatively on quality of life. From the current literature, there does not appear to be a predictable way of preventing or treating dysgeusia.

[Radiotherapy, chemotherapy and target therapy for treatment of head and neck cancer : new developments]

Approximately 60% of patients initially treated for squamous cell cancer of the upper gastrointestinal tract suffer from advanced tumor disease (UICC stages III and IV). Multimodal strategies lead to overall survival rates of up to 50%. Recent studies show indications that the risk of distant metastases after induction chemotherapy (CT) is less than after primary radiotherapy (RT) or radiochemotherapy (RCT). Hyperfractionation or accelerated radiation with concomitant boost shows superior results compared to classic RT. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is a new method for better adjusted dose distribution. Targeted therapy with specific antibodies against biological targets, such as epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), showed superiority over RT but the comparison to classic RCT is still pending. Targeted therapy against vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGR) showed antiangiogenetic effects on tumors. In cases of non-resectability or distant metastases, palliative CT and target therapy are recommended. Reirradiation or IMRT offer increased locoregional tumor control at the expense of higher toxicity. Overall, advances in research on tumor biology offer increasingly more prognostic factors and markers for customized individual targeted therapy and CT.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy/gefitinib followed by concurrent chemotherapy/radiation therapy/gefitinib for patients with locally advanced squamous carcinoma of the head and neck

BACKGROUND

The authors evaluated the feasibility, toxicity, and efficacy of gefitinib added to first-line combined-modality therapy for patients with locally advanced squamous carcinoma of the head and neck.

METHODS

Patients with biopsy-proven locally advanced squamous carcinoma of the head and neck who had low expected cure rates with local treatment modalities alone were eligible for this treatment. All patients received a 6-week induction course of docetaxel, carboplatin, infusional 5-fluorouracil, and gefitinib (250 mg daily). Gefitinib was continued while patients received concurrent weekly docetaxel and radiation therapy. After the completion of radiation therapy, gefitinib was continued until patients developed disease progression or for a maximum of 24 months.

RESULTS

Sixty-two patients (53% with stage IV disease) received protocol treatment, and 50 patients (81%) were able to complete the regimen. The addition of gefitinib increased the incidence of grade 3/4 mucositis (27%) and diarrhea (16%) during induction therapy but did not appear to add substantially to toxicity during concurrent chemoradiation. The estimated 3-year progression-free and overall survival rates for the entire group were 41% and 54%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of gefitinib was associated with a moderate increase in toxicity with this combined modality regimen, particularly during induction therapy. Although this regimen was efficacious, the survival results overlap with results reported with chemoradiation alone. The role of epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors in first-line, combined-modality therapy for patients with head and neck cancer remains undefined.

Radiochemotherapy in locally advanced squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck

Squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) is a common disease that develops in the upper aerodigestive epithelium. The most important risk factors are tobacco and alcohol consumption. There is also increasing evidence that human papillomavirus plays an important role in the cause of SCCHN. The complex anatomy, the vital functions of the upper aerodigestive tract and the close proximity to vital structures, explain that the goal of treatment is not only to improve survival outcomes, but also to preserve organ function. Radiotherapy and surgery are the standard modalities of treatment, reflecting the locoregional predominance of SCCHN. Chemotherapy plays an important role in the treatment of patients with locoregionally advanced disease, in conjunction with radiotherapy and surgery. Indeed, standard therapy for resectable locoregionally advanced (stage III or IV) SCCHN cancers consists either of surgery and adjuvant chemoradiotherapy or definitive concomitant chemoradiotherapy, depending upon disease site, stage and resectability of the tumour, or institutional experience. Concomitant chemoradiotherapy has been shown in several randomised trials to improve disease-free and overall survival in the postoperative setting for resected disease with poor prognostic factors. Furthermore, multiple randomised studies and meta-analyses have shown that definitive chemoradiotherapy, as well anti-epidermal growth factor receptor treatment in one randomised study, improved disease-free and overall survival when compared with radiotherapy alone. This overview reviews the most relevant published studies on the multidisciplinary management of SCCHN and discusses future strategies to reduce locoregional failures.

Favorable survival observed after carboplatin, paclitaxel, and concurrent accelerated hyperfractionated radiotherapy for treatment of locally advanced head and neck carcinoma

PURPOSE

Several trials have demonstrated the superiority of simultaneous chemoradiotherapy compared with radiation alone for patients with locally advanced head and neck cancers. However, the optimal regimen remains to be defined. This study assessed the safety and activity of combined carboplatin (C), paclitaxel (P), and twice-daily radiotherapy (RT) in a community based, multicenter, phase II trial.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eligible patients (N = 52) had ECOG PS 0-2 and previously untreated, stage III or IV (M0), unresectable, squamous cell cancers of the head and neck. Treatment consisted of 6 weekly courses of C (AUC = 1), P (40 mg/m(2)/1-h) and twice-daily radiation (120 cGy BID; total dose of 6,960 cGy). Subsequently, patients with N2/N3 disease were permitted neck dissection.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 61 months. Sixty-seven percent (67%) of patients had stage IV (M0) disease at baseline. Fifty-five percent (55%) of treated patients experienced NCI Grade 3-4 dysphagia, stomatitis, or mucositis; 80% had > or = Grade 3 toxicity of any organ system. Median weight loss was 7.1 lbs; 35% of patients experienced 10% or more weight loss. Of 43 patients evaluable for response, responses were: 29 CR (67%), 7 PR (16%), 1 MR (2%), 4 SD (9%), and 2 PD (5%); the overall response rate (CR+PR) was 84%. For the entire cohort of 52 patients, the estimated overall survival at 36 months was 60%; progression-free survival was 50%.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that weekly C + P and concurrent twice-daily hyperfractionated radiotherapy is tolerated and highly active in patients with unresectable, locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

Clinical trial design limitations in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The present article reviews the randomized trials contributing to the establishment of current standards for the treatment of head and neck cancer. It provides critical analysis of their methodology in order to facilitate future trial design.

RECENT FINDINGS

From a prognosis perspective, head and neck cancers are a heterogeneous group of diseases. Following a number of randomized clinical trials evaluating the role of chemotherapy in the induction, concomitant and adjuvant settings, there has been considerable improvement in the treatment of locally advanced head and neck cancers during the last decade. It is, however, difficult to interpret and compare the results optimally and to build on efficient trial designs as most of the trials included patients with different levels of essential prognostic factors.

SUMMARY

All key randomized trials will be reviewed according to eligibility criteria, subgroup issues, trial power and historical controls. Methodological interpretation and possible plans for the next generation of clinical trials will be presented.

Standard, and novel cytotoxic and molecular-targeted, therapies for HNSCC: an evidence-based review

(1) Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma is the sixth most frequently occurring cancer worldwide.(2) Chemotherapy has shown some success as part of multimodal treatment schedules for locally advanced, nonmetastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, and too a much lesser extent for metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.(3) A recent meta-analysis of 32 studies involving >10,000 patients concluded that chemotherapy added to radiotherapy produces a large survival advantage relative to radiotherapy alone.(4) Concurrent or alternate chemoradiotherapy, with a schedule based on cisplatin, has an established place in the management of locally advanced nonmetastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Cetuximab combined with radiotherapy: an alternative to chemoradiotherapy for patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck?

Radiotherapy remains the foundation of current treatment for patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). It has been shown that the addition of concurrent chemotherapy to radiotherapy (chemoradiotherapy, CRT, or chemotherapy-enhanced radiation therapy, CERT) results in improved clinical outcome in terms of both locoregional control and overall survival in some groups of patients. However, CRT is associated with severe, dose-limiting acute toxicities and, in some patients, a higher proportion of late toxicities. In addition, most CRT regimens are platinum-based and there is evidence that the maximum tolerable toxicity has been reached with the dose intensities currently used in bolus cisplatin regimens. Therefore, if we are to further improve outcomes through increased treatment compliance, more effective and more tolerable regimens are needed. Recent results from a phase III randomised study demonstrate that the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor cetuximab (Erbitux)given concomitantly with radiotherapy yields a significant clinical benefit over radiotherapy alone without any increase in radiotherapy-associated toxicity. In this review, we explore the question of the degree to which adding cetuximab improves the efficacy of radiotherapy in locally advanced SCCHN and how the benefits of cetuximab plus radiotherapy compare with those achievable with CRT.

Induction chemotherapy in the management of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

Platinum-based chemotherapy administered concurrently with radiation has been adopted as the standard treatment for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Historically, randomized trials using induction chemotherapy prior to radiation therapy alone have failed to demonstrate a clear survival advantage, and concurrent chemoradiation has delivered better results than previously obtained with radiation therapy alone, establishing the benefit of adding chemotherapy. This method of treatment, together with new modalities of therapy and novel agents, has reintroduced the question of induction chemotherapy before definitive chemoradiation. Systemic chemotherapy offers a better possibility of reducing systemic metastasis and improving cosmetic appearance. This article reviews developing trends using induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

DNA-Repair Gene Polymorphisms Predict Favorable Clinical Outcome Among Patients With Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck Treated With Cisplatin-Based Induction Chemotherapy

Purpose

Cisplatin kills tumor cells through DNA cross linking. Alterations in the function of DNA repair genes may affect DNA repair proficiency and influence cancer patients' response to cisplatin. We studied whether single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of DNA repair genes predict the response to cisplatin or prognosis in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN).

Methods

A polymerase chain reaction–restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) approach was used to determine the frequency of the SNPs: XPD-Asp312Asn, XPD-Lys751Gln, ERCC1-C8092A, and XRCC1-Arg399Gln in DNA from peripheral lymphocytes of 103 stage IV SCCHN patients.

Results

The frequencies of the distinct genotypes were, respectively, for the homozygous common allele, heterozygous and homozygous polymorphic variant: 53%, 40%, and 7% for ERCC1; 50%, 42%, and 8% for XPD-312; 35%, 57%, and 8% for XPD751; and 35%, 51%, and 13% for XRCC1. Patients with only common alleles at all the SNPs tested had a median overall survival of 5.1 months (range, 4.3 to 6.0 months) as compared with not reached for patients with at least one polymorphic variant (P < .001). Estimates from Cox's multivariate analysis suggest that the accumulation of each polymorphic variant decreases the probability of dying by a factor of 2.1 (P < .001; the presence of seven polymorphic variants confers a 175-fold protection). The accumulation of polymorphic variants increases by 2.94-fold the probability of achieving a complete response to treatment (P = .041).

Conclusion

Using a multivariate model, the presence of polymorphic variants in DNA-repair genes are powerful prognosis factors and response to cisplatin predictors among SCCHN patients.

Does induction chemotherapy have a role in the management of locoregionally advanced squamous cell head and neck cancer?

The use of systemic chemotherapy before definitive locoregional management, or induction chemotherapy, has been a theoretically attractive and well-studied approach in the management of squamous cell head and neck cancer. Although a decrease in distant metastases has frequently been observed, an improvement in survival from induction has been difficult to demonstrate. When chemotherapy and radiation are used concomitantly, however, an improvement in both survival and locoregional control can be identified, and this has led to the adoption of concurrent chemoradiotherapy as a standard of care for these patients. With this improvement in locoregional control, distant metastases have become a more frequently recognized cause of treatment failure, suggesting that an intervention, such as induction chemotherapy, directed at improving distant control might now be of some importance in improving overall treatment success. The recent development of taxane-containing, three-drug induction regimens that are capable of producing significantly better response rates than the older cisplatin and fluorouracil combination has also raised the possibility of a new and more important role for induction. The results of phase II investigations using this kind of a sequential schedule of induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy have been encouraging, and phase III trials are now underway. This treatment approach remains investigational however, and these phase III studies are critical. The current randomized trials are reviewed and discussed.

Reassessment of the role of induction chemotherapy for head and neck cancer

Head and neck cancers are a complex group of diseases defined by variations in histological features, anatomical location, and cause. Once the realm of surgeons and radiation oncologists, the treatment of locally advanced disease now involves medical oncologists. Major developments include primary chemoradiotherapy for unresectable disease and organ preservation, the addition of chemotherapy to adjuvant radiotherapy, improvement in surgical and radiation techniques, and biological therapies. Concomitant chemoradiotherapy consistently improves locoregional control. However, control of distant metastases is poor, resulting in an increasing proportion of deaths from systemic recurrence. Given this shift in site of recurrence, therapeutic strategies to suppress distant metastases may be the next goal for further improvement of survival. One approach that merits reassessment is the use of induction chemotherapy in the setting of locally advanced disease--both resectable and unresectable. In this review we summarise data for the use of induction chemotherapy to define better which patients will likely benefit from this approach now and which questions are important in the design of future clinical trials.

Recent new approaches to the treatment of head and neck cancer

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is the sixth most common cancer in the world and affects 50,000 Americans annually. During the past 20 years, treatments for HNSCC have changed dramatically due largely to the advent of novel approaches such as combined modality therapy, as well as improvements in surgical and radiotherapeutic techniques. Ongoing advances in the multidisciplinary management of this complex and multivariate disease process are resulting in improved function, quality of life and survival. Here, we review state-of-the-art therapy and presents selected advances in the treatment of head and neck cancer.

Paradigm shift in the treatment of head and neck cancer: the role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Chemotherapy is an integral component of the management of patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer, though the optimal use of chemotherapy remains to be defined. The combination of a platinum agent and 5-fluorouracil has been used as the standard neoadjuvant treatment and has been shown to permit organ preservation in operable patients and improve long-term survival outcomes in operable and inoperable patients. Recently, the addition of a taxane, docetaxel or paclitaxel, to standard platinum plus 5-fluorouracil induction chemotherapy has been shown to further improve response rates and survival outcomes. Phase III data are emerging to support combinations of docetaxel or paclitaxel with a platinum plus 5-fluorouracil as a new, more effective and less toxic standard for neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Sequential treatment regimens, incorporating a combination of induction chemotherapy and chemoradiation, are also under study in efforts to further improve long-term survival outcomes. Induction regimens incorporating docetaxel or paclitaxel with a platinum plus 5-fluorouracil are under evaluation in this setting. Randomized trials comparing a sequential treatment approach with standard therapies are also being undertaken and will likely define a new treatment paradigm for patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer.

Paclitaxel, cisplatin, leucovorin, and continuous infusion fluorouracil followed by concomitant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group Phase II Study

The primary objective of this phase II study was to access the complete response (CR) rate to a new innovative induction regimen in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer (LA-HNC). From October 2000 until October 2003 a total of 38 eligible patients (33 men and 5 women) entered the study. The large majority of them presented with a performance status of 0-1 and with clinical stage IV disease. Treatment consisted of three cycles of induction chemotherapy (IC) with paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 in a 3-h infusion on d 1, leucovorin (LV) 200 mg/m2 over 20 min immediately followed by FU 400 mg/m2 bolus and then 600 mg/m2 as a 24-h continuous infusion on d 1 and 2 and a cisplatin 75 mg/m2 over 1-h infusion on d 2 every 3 wk. This was then followed by radiation (70 Gy) and weekly cisplatin 40 mg/m2. After the completion of IC, 6/38 (16%) patients had CR. The CR rate was increased to 66% post-concomitant chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). Neutropenia (37.5%), pain (62%), nausea/vomiting (21%), and alopecia (79%) were the most frequent side effects during IC. The most pronounced toxicities during chemoradiotherapy were stomatitis (62.5%) and xerostomia (53%). Median time to progression was 11.0 mo and median survival 16.7 mo. One- and 2-yr survival rates were 73% and 38%, respectively. In conclusion, this novel induction regimen is active, is well tolerated, and can be successfully followed by CCRT with weekly cisplatin. CCRT should remain standard treatment for patients with LA-HNC. Novel induction combinations, such as that reported in the present study, should be evaluated in combination with CCRT only in the context of clinical trials.

State-of-the-art management of locally advanced head and neck cancer

During the past 20 years, treatments for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) have changed dramatically owing largely to the advent of novel approaches such as combined modality therapy as well as improvements in surgical and radiotherapeutic techniques. Locally advanced disease in particular, which engendered very high recurrence and mortality rates, is now associated with long-term disease-free survival in the majority of cases. This article will focus on locally advanced HNSCC, which frequently remains a clinical challenge, review state-of-the-art therapy, and introduce promising novel therapies. The field continues to evolve rapidly with new evidence during the past year clearly establishing the benefit of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT), as well as early evidence showing improved survival with the use of an epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor in combination with radiotherapy. There are varied regimens in use for patients with locally advanced disease, but at the same time the multitude of options can plague the clinician when trying to select the most appropriate one. This article will attempt to put the various approaches into perspective and propose an evidence-based treatment algorithm.

Four Decades of Continuing Innovation With Fluorouracil: Current and Future Approaches to Fluorouracil Chemoradiation Therapy

Purpose

Chemoradiotherapy, the combination of external radiation therapy and concurrent chemotherapy, has been the basis for the oncologic management of many patients since its development in the 1960s. Fluorouracil (FU) chemoradiotherapy has demonstrated success in several organ sites with multiple dosing schedules that now guide the selection of oral analogs of FU to provide new chemoradiotherapy options.

Methods

This article reviews the metabolism and pharmacology of FU and the advantages of administration of FU by continuous infusion or bolus. The potential role and impact of the oral fluorouracil prodrugs UFT, S-1, BOF-A2, and capecitabine as replacements for intravenous administration are discussed. The results of recent chemoradiotherapy studies with FU from 2000 to 2003 are summarized in rectal, head and neck, esophageal, gastric, pancreatic, biliary, anal, and cervical cancers.

Results

Chemoradiotherapy with FU has the potential to widen the therapeutic window by minimizing normal tissue toxicity while maintaining effective tumor toxicity. Overall, FU chemoradiotherapy maximizes local control and, for some tumor sites (such as head and neck, pancreatic, biliary, cervical, esophageal, and gastric cancers), improves survival rates. Moreover, FU chemoradiotherapy results in improved organ preservation with excellent functional outcome in several anatomic sites including head and neck cancer, anal, and rectal cancer, with improved sphincter preservation.

Conclusion

FU chemoradiotherapy continues to play an important role in the management of many cancer sites. During the last four decades, optimal dosing schedules have produced a therapeutic gain. The introduction of oral prodrug analogs will likely further improve the results of FU therapy in several organ systems, such as the rectum, head and neck, and esophagus.

The expanding role of systemic therapy in head and neck cancer

Treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) has evolved greatly in the last two decades, owing to the integration of chemotherapy, advances in radiotherapeutic techniques, and organ-preserving surgery. Several randomized trials have established new standards of care that should be adopted. Current efforts are building on these earlier trials in order to improve survival and quality of life. Coincident with this, investigators are developing molecularly targeted approaches that hold promise for the future. This review will focus on current therapy for locally advanced, recurrent, and metastatic SCCHN and discuss controversies and directions for future research.

Chemotherapy in the Management of Advanced Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Organ Transplant Recipients: Theoretical and Practical Considerations

BACKGROUND

The use of chemotherapy in organ transplant recipients (OTRs) with advanced and metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) remains relatively unexplored in dermatology. Advances in the use of chemotherapy in metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) may be applicable to this increasingly common disease.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to determine whether recent advances in the role of chemotherapy in the management of HNSCC and cutaneous SCC offer insights into treatment strategies for metastatic cutaneous SCC.

METHODS

We reviewed the literature pertaining to treatment of advanced and metastatic HNSCC and cutaneous SCC, with particular attention to the role of chemotherapy. In addition, specialists in the fields of cutaneous oncology and dermatologic surgery, head and neck surgery, medical oncology, and radiation oncology were consulted for expert multidisciplinary advice.

RESULTS

Specific roles for chemotherapy in the management of advanced and cutaneous HNSCC are discussed and summarized. In addition, we propose theoretical analogies in the treatment of advanced and metastatic cutaneous SCC in OTRs.

CONCLUSIONS

The head and neck surgery and oncology literature is rich with experience in locoregionally advanced and metastatic HNSCC, and adaptation of management concepts may prove feasible in the management of OTRs with advanced and metastatic cutaneous SCC.

An update of the etiology and management of xerostomia

Salivary gland disease gives rise to salivary gland enlargement, pain, and prolonged xerostomia (dry mouth). Xerostomia is the most common long-standing problem for the majority of affected patients. There are many causes of dry mouth, with long-standing xerostomia being a particular problem in Sjögren's syndrome and after radiation to the head and neck region. Xerostomia is usually managed with saliva substitutes, but a large number of potential systemic therapies of long-standing xerostomia now exist. Some-particularly immunosuppressants-are of fundamental interest for the potential reduction of gland damage in Sjögren's syndrome but as yet are of limited clinical usefulness. Others, particularly pilocarpine and cevimeline, are, or have the potential to be, clinically useful in stimulating salivation by virtue of their action on cholinergic receptors.