Spinal anaesthesia in paediatric patients

A review of perioperative anesthesia and analgesia for infants: updates and trends to watch

This review focuses on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of opioid and non-opioid analgesics in neonates and infants. The unique physiology of this population differs from that of adults and impacts drug handling. Morphine and remifentanil are described as examples of older versus recently developed opiates to compare and contrast pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in infants. Exploration of genetics affecting both pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of opiates is an area of active research, as is the investigation of a new class of mu-opiate-binding agents which seem selective for analgesic pathways while having less activity in pathways linked to side effects. The kinetics of acetaminophen and of ketorolac as examples of parenteral non-steroidal analgesics in infants are also discussed. The growth in regional anesthesia for peri-operative analgesia in infants can fill an important role minimizing intra-operative anesthetic exposure to opioids and transitioning to post-operative care. Use of multi-modal techniques is recommended to decrease undesirable opiate-related side effects in this vulnerable population.

Continuous epidural pumping of saline contributes to prevent and treat postdural puncture headache

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Postdural puncture headache (PDPH) is the most common symptom of accidental dural puncture, a frequent complication of intraspinal anesthesia. We developed a postoperative intervention technique to prevent and treat PDPH in accidental dural puncture patients, including epidural pumping of saline. This retrospective study aimed to retrospectively evaluate this new technique for PDPH prevention and treatment.

DESIGN

Retrospective study.

SETTING

Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital affiliated to the Capital Medical University, between January 2006 and December 2012.

PATIENTS

Eighty-seven cases undergoing intraspinal anesthesia were assessed.

INTERVENTIONS

Of these patients, 68 cases had successful repuncture and were assigned to group A (epidural filling group, n=68), receiving continuous epidural pumping of 0.9% NS (150mL) at a rate of 6mL/h; the remaining cases were assigned to group B (conservative therapy group, n=19).

MEASUREMENTS

Age, height, and body weight were collected, and postoperative headache was assessed using a visual analog scale.

MAIN RESULTS

Of 68 patients in group A, 49 (72.1%) developed PDPH, whereas all in group B developed PDPH (P=.009). In addition, all patients showed PDPH within 3days after surgery regardless of treatment group. However, a statistically significant difference was obtained for PDPH duration between groups A and B (P<.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that frequency of epidural puncture and continuous epidural pumping of saline were significant risk factors for PDPH.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data indicated that application of 6mL/h saline effectively contributes to PDPH management, and its clinical application should be broadened.

Headache after lumbar puncture: randomised crossover trial of 22-gauge versus 25-gauge needles

OBJECTIVES

To compare the frequency of headache and the procedure time following lumbar puncture (LP) using a 25-gauge needle compared to a 22-gauge needle.

DESIGN

4-period crossover blinded randomised controlled trial.

SETTING

Oncology unit, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne.

PATIENTS

Children aged 4-15 years at enrolment having LPs as part of their treatment for leukaemia.

INTERVENTIONS

Each child was allocated a random sequence of four LPs, two with a 22-gauge and two with a 25-gauge needle.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The presence of post-LP headache. Secondary outcomes included the presence of any headache, procedure time and impact of headache on the family.

RESULTS

Data on 341 procedures in 93 randomised children were analysed. There was little difference in the incidence of post-LP headache between the two needle sizes (22-gauge 7.2%, 95% CI 3.8 to 12.2; 25-gauge 4.6%, 95% CI 2.0 to 8.9, p=0.3) or in the incidence of any headache (22-gauge 18% 95% CI 12.5 to 24.6; 25-gauge 15%, 95% CI 10.0 to 21.1, p=0.4). Use of the 25-gauge needle was associated with longer procedure times. The incidence of post-LP headache showed little evidence of an age effect (OR =1.1, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.3) and was higher in girls than in boys (11% vs 3%, respectively, OR=3.3, 95% CI 1.3 to 8.4, p=0.014). Fifty-five per cent of families with a child with a post-LP headache assessed the overall functional impact as moderate or severe.

CONCLUSIONS

There was little difference in the occurrence of post-LP headache or any headache between procedures carried out using the 22-gauge or 25-gauge needles. Depending on the circumstances of the procedure and the experience of the operator, either gauge may be appropriate for an LP in a child.

Spinal blocks

Every anesthetist should have the expertise to perform lumbar puncture that is the prerequisite to induce spinal anesthesia. Spinal anesthesia is easy and effective technique: small amount of local anesthetic injected in the lumbar cerebrospinal fluid provides highly effective anesthesia, analgesia, and sympathetic and motor block in the lower part of the body. The main limitation of spinal anesthesia is a variable and relatively short duration of the block with a single-injection of local anesthetic. With appropriate use of adjuvant or combining spinal anesthesia with epidural anesthesia, the analgesic action can be controlled in case of early recovery of initial block or in patients with prolonged procedures. Contraindications are rare. Bleeding disorders and any major dysfunction in coagulation system are rare in children, but spinal anesthesia should not be used in children with local infection or increased intracranial pressure. Children with spinal anesthesia may develop the same adverse effects as has been reported in adults, but in contrast to adults, cardiovascular deterioration is uncommon in children even with high blocks. Most children having surgery with spinal anesthesia need sedation, and in these cases, close monitoring of sufficient respiratory function and protective airway reflexes is necessary. Postdural puncture headache and transient neurological symptoms have been reported also in pediatric patients, and thus, guardians should be provided instructions for follow-up and contact information if symptoms appear or persist after discharge. Epidural blood patch is effective treatment for prolonged, severe headache, and nonopioid analgesic is often sufficient for transient neurological symptoms.

Comparison of awake spinal with awake caudal anesthesia in preterm and ex-preterm infants for herniotomy

BACKGROUND

Spinal anesthesia (SA) is widely used for awake regional anesthesia in ex-preterm infants scheduled for herniotomy. Awake caudal anesthesia (CA) is suggested as an alternative approach for these patients and type of surgery. The aim of this study was to compare efficacy and complications of the two different techniques.

METHODS

Two historical populations of 575 ex-preterm infants undergoing herniotomy under awake SA (n = 339; 1998-2001) and under awake CA (n = 236; 2001-2009) were investigated. Data are compared using t-test and chi-square tests (P < 0.05).

RESULTS

The SA group consisted of 339 patients, they were born after 32.0 (3.3) weeks of gestation on average with a mean birth weight of 1691 g (725). The CA group consisted of 236 patients born after 32.1 weeks (3.7) with a mean birth weight of 1617 g (726). At the time of operation, the total age was 41.37 (3.6) and 41.28 (4.0), respectively, for SA and CA patients, and the corresponding weights were 3326 (1083) g and 3267 (931) g for SA and CA patients, respectively. For SA, significantly more puncture attempts were needed (1.83 vs 1.44, P < 0.001). Surgery was performed under pure regional anesthesia in 85% (SA) and 90.1% (CA) (ns). A change to general anesthesia was necessary in 7.7% (SA) and 3.9% (CA) (ns). Overall, intra- and postoperative complications were not statistically different.

CONCLUSIONS

Caudal anesthesia was shown to be technically less difficult than SA and to have a higher success rate. Its application as awake regional anesthesia technique in these patients seems more appropriate than SA.

Incidence of postdural puncture headache and backache following diagnostic/therapeutic lumbar puncture using a 22G cutting spinal needle, and after introduction of a 25G pencil point spinal needle

BACKGROUND

Postdural puncture headache (PDPH) after lumbar puncture (LP) is as common in children as adults. 22G needles are routinely used in adults and children for diagnostic/therapeutic LP, in contrast to 25G or less as standard for spinal anesthesia. We sought to identify incidence of PDPH and backache in oncology children undergoing LP at Royal Marsden Hospital, and whether this could be reduced by a change from 22G to 25G pencil point needle.

METHODS

Symptom questionnaires were given to parents for completion 7 days following LP, and incidence of side effects ascertained. The standard needle was a 22G Quincke. A 25G pencil point spinal needle was subsequently introduced and incidence of side effects reaudited. Number of attempts with the pencil point needle was documented.

RESULTS

Fifty-six of 83 questionnaires were completed for the 22G Quincke (67%). Incidence of headache was 33%, with 11% classified as PDPH (6 children, 2 > 7 days). Nausea/vomiting occurred in 25% and backache in 11%; 43 of 79 questionnaires were completed for the 25G pencil point needle (54%). Incidence of headache was 30% with 7% classified as PDPH (3 children, none >7 days). Nausea/vomiting occurred in 23%, and backache in none. Seventy percentage of needle insertions by pediatricians were successful on first attempt, 89% on second, and 100% on third.

CONCLUSIONS

We have confirmed a significant incidence of PDPH in oncology patients and suggest that a 25G pencil point needle can be used successfully for diagnostic/therapeutic LP, with significantly reduced incidence of back pain, and a small tendency towards a shorter duration of PDPH symptoms.

Spinal anesthesia in neonates and infants - a single-center experience of 505 cases

BACKGROUND

Our aim was to assess the safety and efficacy of spinal anesthesia (SA) in newborns and infants undergoing surgery appropriate for this technique.

METHODS

The files of 505 patients who underwent surgery under spinal anesthesia since 1998 at a major tertiary hospital in Israel were analyzed retrospectively. SA was performed with bupivacaine 5 mgxml(-1) by attending pediatric anesthesiologists or an anesthesia resident. Demographic data, prematurity history, comorbidities, technical data, cardiovascular stability, complications and supplementary drugs were documented. The surgeon assessed the quality of anesthesia at the end of surgery.

RESULTS

Appropriate SA was achieved in 95.3% of cases; in 69.9% at the first attempt. The mean number of attempts per patient was 1.41 and mean dose of bupivacaine was 0.66 +/- 0.16 mgxkg(-1). Intravenous sedation, usually with midazolam (dose 0.1-0.2 mgxkg(-1)) was required in 28.1% of children because of crying/restlessness. Intraoperative conversion to general anesthesia was necessary in five patients (1.04%). The main side effect was bradycardia (<100 bxmin(-1)) without desaturation which occurred in nine patients (1.8%). In three patients (0.62%), high spinal block occurred without bradycardia and hypotension. None of the patients had postoperative meningitis.

CONCLUSIONS

SA is safe and effective in newborns and infants undergoing low abdominal, perineal and orthopedic surgery. In order to save time, our advice is to attempt SA after the surgeon is scrubbed, and minimize surgical teaching activity. The need to deal with a small and sometimes sick patient independent of the type of anesthesia requires the presence of an experienced pediatric anesthesiologist.

Spinal anesthesia in infants with ventriculoperitoneal shunt: report of five cases and review of literature

We describe five cases of children with ventriculoperitoneal shunt who underwent abdominal and perineal procedures under spinal anesthesia. Four of them had been born prematurely, and all had suffered from severe neonatal complications. All of our patients suffered from severe respiratory impairment, that had required mechanical ventilation, and three of them suffered additionally from apnea of prematurity. Four patients had ventriculoperitoneal shunt inserted because of obstructive hydrocephalus and one because of congenital central nervous system anomalies. Two underwent subsequently shunt revision. The benefits of spinal anesthesia in this high-risk population are described. The risks of spinal anesthesia in the presence of a ventricular shunt device, especially infection and dural leakage, are discussed, and the literature about this topic briefly reviewed.