Inhibition of aldosterone and endothelin-1 by carperitide was attenuated with more than 1 week of infusion in patients with congestive heart failure

Effect of carperitide on the 1 year prognosis of patients with acute decompensated heart failure

Aims

Acute heart failure (AHF) is a clinical syndrome with a poor prognosis and a major public health concern worldwide. The aim of this study was to investigate whether carperitide administration improves the 1 year prognosis of patients with AHF and to check whether there is an optimal dose of the drug.

Methods and results

We analysed the data of COOPERATE‐HF‐J (the Consortium for Pooled Data Analysis regarding Hospitalized Patients with Heart Failure in Japan), combining two cohorts (NARA‐HF and REALITY‐AHF), which included 2435 patients with acute decompensated heart failure. The patients were divided into no carperitide (NO‐ANP, n = 1098); very low‐dose carperitide (VLD‐ANP, <0.02 μg/kg/min, n = 593); and low‐dose carperitide groups (LD‐ANP, ≥0.02 μg/kg/min, n = 744). The primary endpoint was cardiovascular mortality within 1 year after admission. The secondary endpoints were all‐cause mortality and rehospitalization due to worsening heart failure within 1 year after admission. The median carperitide doses in the VLD‐ANP and LD‐ANP groups were 0.013 and 0.025 μg/kg/min, respectively. Kaplan–Meier analysis showed that cardiovascular mortality and all‐cause mortality were significantly lower in the LD‐ANP group than in the NO‐ANP and VLD‐ANP groups (P < 0.001 and P = 0.002, respectively). Multivariable Cox regression analysis for cardiovascular and all‐cause mortality revealed that LD‐ANP was significantly associated with lower cardiovascular and all‐cause mortality within 1 year after admission, even after adjusting other covariates (hazard ratio: 0.696 and 0.791, 95% confidence interval: 0.513–0.944 and 0.628–0.997, P = 0.020 and 0.047, respectively).

Conclusions

Low‐dose carperitide was significantly associated with lower cardiovascular and all‐cause mortality within 1 year after admission. Our results suggest the necessity for well‐designed randomized controlled trials to determine the doses of carperitide that could improve clinical outcomes in patients with AHF.

Rationale and Design of Low-dose Administration of Carperitide for Acute Heart Failure (LASCAR-AHF)

BACKGROUNDS

Despite current therapies, acute heart failure (AHF) remains a major public health burden with high rates of in-hospital and post-discharge morbidity and mortality. Carperitide is a recombinantly produced intravenous formulation of human atrial natriuretic peptide that promotes vasodilation with increased salt and water excretion, which leads to reduction of cardiac filling pressures. A previous open-label randomized controlled study showed that carperitide improved long-term cardiovascular mortality and heart failure (HF) hospitalization for patients with AHF, when adding to standard therapy. However, the study was underpowered to detect a difference in mortality because of the small sample size.

METHODS

Low-dose Administration of Carperitide for Acute Heart Failure (LASCAR-AHF) is a multicenter, randomized, open-label, controlled study designed to evaluate the efficacy of intravenous carperitide in hospitalized patients with AHF. Patients hospitalized for AHF will be randomly assigned to receive either intravenous carperitide (0.02 μg/kg/min) in addition to standard treatment or matching standard treatment for 72 h. The primary end point is death or rehospitalization for HF within 2 years. A total of 260 patients will be enrolled between 2013 and 2018.

CONCLUSION

The design of LASCAR-AHF will provide data of whether carperitide reduces the risk of mortality and rehospitalization for HF in selected patients with AHF.

Effects of early diuretic response to carperitide in acute decompensated heart failure treatment: A single-center retrospective study

Background

Diuretic response is a strong predictor of outcome for admitted patients of acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF). However, little is known about the effects of early diuretic response to carperitide.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed records of 85 patients hospitalized for ADHF who received carperitide as initial treatment and <40 mg furosemide during the early period. The eligible patients were divided into good diuretic responder (GR) group and poor diuretic responder (PR) group on the basis of median urinary volume.

Results

The PR group demonstrated older age, lower body mass index (BMI), lower estimated glomerular filtration rate, and higher blood urea nitrogen (BUN) level, left ventricular ejection fraction, and β-blockers prescribed at baseline than the GR group. The incidence of worsening renal function (WRF) was significantly higher in the PR group than in the GR group. There was no correlation between early intravenous furosemide dose and urinary volume (Spearman correlation, ρ = 0.111, p = 0.312). Multivariate analysis showed that the statistically significant independent factors associated with poor diuretic response to carperitide were BMI (Odds ratio (OR) = 0.82, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.68–0.94, p = 0.004) and BUN (OR = 1.07, 95%CI 1.01–1.15, p = 0.018). Kaplan–Meier analysis indicated a lower event-free rate in the PR group than in the GR group (log-rank, p = 0.007).

Conclusions

BMI and BUN levels on admission were significant determinants of early poor diuretic response to carperitide. Early poor diuretic response to carperitide was associated with future poor outcomes.

Comparison of salt with low-dose furosemide and carperitide for treating acute decompensated heart failure: a single-center retrospective cohort study

Hypertonic saline with furosemide has been proposed for a long time as an effective therapeutic option for the treatment of acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF). We previously reported the efficacy of continuous infusion of 1.7 % hypertonic saline plus low-dose furosemide in treatment for ADHF. Although this therapeutic strategy can be a useful option for effective decongestion in treatment for ADHF, there is no study that assesses the effect and safety of saline supplementation compared with standard therapy in Japan. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of 1.7 % hypertonic saline plus low-dose furosemide infusion compared with carperitide. We compared clinical outcomes, adverse events, and cost for patients receiving carperitide (carperitide group) with those for patients receiving 1.7 % hypertonic saline plus low-dose furosemide (salt group) during the initial hospitalization for ADHF. The cost analysis was performed on the basis of the previous report about cost-effectiveness of acute heart failure. A total of 175 ADHF patients received either carperitide (n = 111) or 1.7 % hypertonic saline plus low-dose furosemide infusion (n = 64) as initial treatment. There were no differences in length of hospital stay (27 ± 19 vs. 25 ± 16 day, p = 0.170) and infusion period (7.2 ± 6.1 vs. 8.4 ± 7.5 day, p = 0.474) between the two groups. The incidence of rehospitalization did not differ at 1 month (7.6 vs. 6.6 %, p = 1.000) and 1 year (36.8 vs. 37.7 %, p = 0.907) between the two groups. The Kaplan-Meier curves revealed no significant difference for 1 year all-cause mortality between the two groups (log-rank, p = 0.724). The single hospitalization cost was 95,314 yen lower and the yearly hospitalization cost 125,628 yen lower in the salt group compared with the carperitide group. Thus, intravenous 1.7 % hypertonic saline plus low-dose furosemide infusion is as effective as carperitide in terms of clinical outcome and is a cost-effective therapeutic strategy for the treatment of ADHF.

Efficacy and Safety of 1-Hour Infusion of Recombinant Human Atrial Natriuretic Peptide in Patients With Acute Decompensated Heart Failure: A Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Trial

The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 1-h infusion of recombinant human atrial natriuretic peptide (rhANP) in combination with standard therapy in patients with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF). This was a phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial. Eligible patients with ADHF were randomized to receive a 1-h infusion of either rhANP or placebo at a ratio of 3:1 in combination with standard therapy. The primary endpoint was dyspnea improvement (a decrease of at least 2 grades of dyspnea severity at 12 h from baseline). Reduction in pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) 1 h after infusion was the co-primary endpoint for catheterized patients. Overall, 477 patients were randomized: 358 (93 catheterized) patients received rhANP and 118 (28 catheterized) received placebo. The percentage of patients with dyspnea improvement at 12 h was higher, although not statistically significant, in the rhANP group than in the placebo group (32.0% vs 25.4%, odds ratio=1.382, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.863-2.212, P = 0.17). Reduction in PCWP at 1 h was significantly greater in patients treated with rhANP than in patients treated with placebo (-7.74 ± 5.95 vs -1.82 ± 4.47 mm Hg, P < 0.001). The frequencies of adverse events and renal impairment within 3 days of treatment were similar between the 2 groups. Mortality at 1 month was 3.1% in the rhANP group vs 2.5% in the placebo group (hazard ratio = 1.21, 95% CI: 0.34-4.26; P > 0.99). 1-h rhANP infusion appears to result in prompt, transient hemodynamic improvement with a small, nonsignificant, effect on dyspnea in ADHF patients receiving standard therapy. The safety of 1-h infusion of rhANP seems to be acceptable. (WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform [ICTRP] number, ChiCTR-IPR-14005719.).

Novel vasodilators in heart failure

Heart failure is an important public health problem that is increasing in prevalence throughout the world. Not only is this condition common, but it is associated with significant morbidity and mortality as well as high costs to medical care systems. Vasodilator drugs help unload the heart and may have other effects that could benefit heart failure patients. Consequently, they have emerged as an important therapeutic approach for patients with this condition. Novel vasodilator therapies that are currently in development target new pathways, potentially giving clinicians alternate options for improving outcomes in this vulnerable population. This review focuses on investigational drugs that have the ability to dilate blood vessels amongst their therapeutic properties. These drugs include the natriuretic peptides that activate particulate guanylate cyclase, the novel agent cinaciguat that activates the soluble guanylate cyclase system, and finally a recombinant form of the naturally occurring vasodilating agent relaxin, a hormone that mediates many of the changes that allows the cardiovascular system to successfully adapt to pregnancy.

Efficacy and safety of short-term administration of recombinant human atrial natriuretic peptide (rhANP) for congestive heart failure: a phase II, multicentre randomized controlled dose-finding study

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Although the long-term infusion of ANP has proved effective to treat heart failure, no published randomized controlled study has been reported to confirm the efficacy of the short-term ANP infusion in congestive heart failure (CHF) patients. This study was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of short-term infusion of recombinant human atrial natriuretic peptide (rhANP) in CHF patients.

METHODS

A total of 48 patients with CHF were enrolled and randomized into four groups, treated with standard therapy or rhANP (0·05, 0·1 or 0·2 μg/kg/min) for 1-hour infusion in addition to standard therapy. The hemodynamics were assessed for 12 h by Swan-Ganz catheter.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The effect of the 0·05 μg/kg/min rhANP dose group on CO was modest and transient. The 0·2 μg/kg/min rhANP dose group tended to be associated with better effect on SV, CO and dyspnoea improvement, but modest effect on PCWP and more adverse events probably attributed to the study drug. However, the 0·1 μg/kg/min rhANP infusion was well tolerated and effective both on PCWP decrease (maximum:-9·46 ± 5·81 mmHg compared with baseline (P = 0·0002) and -6·75 mmHg compared with standard therapy, the 95% confidential interval [-13·43, -0·06 mmHg] at 1 h) and CO increase (maximum: 1·02 ± 1·43 L/min [P = 0·0308] at 1 h).

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

In this small-sample study, 1-hour infusion of rhANP produced beneficial hemodynamic effects in CHF patients compared with standard therapy, and it was well tolerated. 0·1 μg/kg/min may be the optimum dose for short-term rhANP infusion to treat CHF for the further large sample trial before clinical application.

Atrial natriuretic peptide exerts protective action against angiotensin II-induced cardiac remodeling by attenuating inflammation via endothelin-1/endothelin receptor A cascade

We aimed to investigate whether atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) attenuates angiotensin II (Ang II)-induced myocardial remodeling and to clarify the possible molecular mechanisms involved. Thirty-five 8-week-old male Wistar-Kyoto rats were divided into control, Ang II, Ang II + ANP, and ANP groups. The Ang II and Ang II + ANP rats received 1 μg/kg/min Ang II for 14 days. The Ang II + ANP and ANP rats also received 0.1 μg/kg/min ANP intravenously. The Ang II and Ang II + ANP rats showed comparable blood pressure. Left ventricular fractional shortening and ejection fraction were lower in the Ang II rats than in controls; these indices were higher (P < 0.001) in the Ang II + ANP rats than in the Ang II rats. In the Ang II rats, the peak velocity of mitral early inflow and its ratio to atrial contraction-related peak flow velocity were lower, and the deceleration time of mitral early inflow was significantly prolonged; these changes were decreased by ANP. Percent fibrosis was higher (P < 0.001) and average myocyte diameters greater (P < 0.01) in the Ang II rats than in controls. ANP decreased both myocardial fibrosis (P < 0.01) and myocyte hypertrophy (P < 0.01). Macrophage infiltration, expression of mRNA levels of collagen types I and III, monocyte chemotactic protein-1, and a profibrotic/proinflammatory molecule, tenascin-C (TN-C) were increased in the Ang II rats; ANP significantly decreased these changes. In vitro, Ang II increased expression of TN-C and endothelin-1 (ET-1) in cardiac fibroblasts, which were reduced by ANP. ET-1 upregulated TN-C expression via endothelin type A receptor. These results suggest that ANP may protect the heart from Ang II-induced remodeling by attenuating inflammation, at least partly through endothelin 1/endothelin receptor A cascade.

Comparison of nitrite compounds and carperitide for initial treatment of acute decompensated heart failure

Human atrial natriuretic peptides and nitrite compounds (NC) are infused for the initial management of acute heart failure (HF). However, there have been few studies comparing their hemodynamic effects.Fifty-two patients in acute decompensated HF (ADHF) who received carperitide (0.07 ± 0.05 µg/kg/minute, n = 23, group C) or NC (0.39 ± 0.24 µg/kg/minute, n = 29, group N) during the initial 24 hours in the intensive care unit between 1997 and 2007 were studied. We measured and compared hemodynamic parameters by pulmonary artery catheter monitoring before and after drug administration. Heart rate (HR), diastolic pulmonary artery pressure (DPAP), and central venous pressure (CVP) after the 24-hour administration were lower (HR: 92 ± 18 versus 79 ± 13 bpm, DPAP: 17 ± 6 versus 11 ± 5 mmHg, CVP: 6 ± 4 versus 3 ± 3 mmHg, P < 0.05, respectively) and the reduction of DPAP and systemic vascular resistance index were higher in group N than in group C. However, there was no significant difference regarding other indicators of preload and afterload. Although the serum B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) level at discharge was lower in group N than group C (382 ± 434 versus 207 ± 201 pg/mL, P < 0.05), there was no significant difference in either the in-hospital reduction of BNP, the duration of hospitalization, or total cardiac events during 1-year follow-up.Although NC tended to improve the hemodynamics of ADHF more than carperitide, both drugs had a similar prognostic impact in patients with ADHF.

Roles of atrial natriuretic peptide and its therapeutic use

Since the discovery of atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP), there has been tremendous progress in our understanding of the physiologic and pathophysiologic, diagnostic, and therapeutic roles of ANP. The diagnostic application of ANP and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) has been reviewed by many investigators, and meta-analyses of therapeutic use of BNP were reported from the USA. However, there are few reviews concerning the therapeutic use of ANP in patients with various conditions. Therefore, this review focuses on the recent clinical evidence of ANP in therapeutic use and experimental data that rationally support the therapeutic use of ANP.

Effects of carperitide on the long-term prognosis of patients with acute decompensated chronic heart failure: the PROTECT multicenter randomized controlled study

BACKGROUND

Carperitide is used to treat acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF), but its effects on long-term prognosis have not been studied.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A multicenter randomized controlled study of 49 patients with ADHF was performed to clarify the drug's effects on long-term prognosis. Low-dose carperitide (0.01-0.05 microg x kg(-1 ) x min(-1)) was infused for 72 h as the initial treatment (n=26), whereas in the control group (n=23), standard medical treatment other than carperitide was given without limitation. Anti-aldosterone drugs were prohibited in both groups. During carperitide infusion, significant increases of the atrial natriuretic peptide and cyclic GMP levels and a significant decrease in the heart-type fatty acid-binding protein/serum creatinine ratio were observed, suggesting inhibition of myocyte cell membrane damage. On the other hand, no significant differences in the plasma brain natriuretic peptide, troponin T, and creatinine levels were noted in either group. During 18-month follow-up, significant reductions of death and rehospitalization occurred in the carperitide vs control group (11.5% vs 34.8%; p=0.0359). Cox regression analysis revealed that randomization to carperitide (p=0.020), pretreatment systolic blood pressure >or=140 mmHg (p=0.043), and beta-blocker therapy (p=0.016) were independent predictors for freedom from cardiac events.

CONCLUSIONS

Acute-phase low-dose carperitide infusion improved the long-term prognosis of patients with ADHF.

Contemporary Issues in the Pharmacologic Management of Acute Heart Failure

Acute heart failure is an evolving syndrome that continues to be defined by ongoing studies and registries. It is associated with significant morbidity and mortality and places a huge economic burden on health care systems. Improved understanding of the underlying pathophysiologic processes has prompted interest into understanding the implications of current and future pharmacologic management strategies beyond hemodynamics. Diuretics, vasodilators, and inotropes remain the mainstays of therapy with several new classes of agents on the horizon. Clinicians should understand the rationale for use and limitations of each therapy to maximize benefit and cost-effectiveness, while minimizing the potential for adverse outcomes.