The Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery: Anatomy and Applicability as a Source of Microvascular Arterial Grafts

A Review of Arterial Grafts Used for Microvascular Arterial Reconstruction

Arterial grafts are sometimes used in microvascular reconstruction and their clinical benefit over standard venous grafts is unknown. To determine arterial graft utilization in clinical microvascular arterial reconstruction, a review of the literature was done. PubMed search resulted with 4,352 finds, and after screening for relevance, 11 articles reporting on 55 arterial grafts were analyzed. All reports were retrospective studies, case reports, and case series, with no randomized controlled trials. Two retrospective series reported better patency of arterial versus venous grafts in upper-limb revascularization for chronic occlusion, but the findings were highly biased. Better patency of arterial grafts did not lead to higher rate of clinical improvement. Antiplatelet and lipid-lowering agents seem to be underused in venous graft recipients and use of no-touch venous grafting has not been reported. Based on the available data, routine use of arterial grafts cannot be recommended. Studies that show better patency of arterial grafts in hand revascularization for chronic vascular insufficiency are retrospective and biased, so a randomized controlled trial is needed.

Prevalence and Utilization of Obturator Artery Anatomic Variant in Autologous Breast Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

 The objective of this study is to quantify the prevalence and describe the utilization of an anatomic vascular variant in which the obturator artery (OA) arises from the trunk of the deep inferior epigastric artery (DIEA) in stacked/dual-pedicled autologous breast reconstruction. When this variant is identified preoperatively on computed tomography angiography (CTA), it may be utilized in a "flow-through" fashion to direct antegrade internal mammary artery (IMA) flow into a second free flap to facilitate anastomotic arrangement and optimize perfusion.

METHODS

 Preoperatively obtained abdomen/pelvis CTA imaging of 121 autologous breast reconstruction patients were retrospectively reviewed for the unilateral or bilateral presence of the OA branch arising from the DIEA (OA variant). The results were analyzed using descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

 Our analysis revealed the presence of the OA variant in 60 of the 121 (49.6%) breast reconstruction candidates, either unilaterally or bilaterally. Out of these patients, the variant was present unilaterally in 33 (55%) and bilaterally in 27 (45%) patients. Of the unilateral variants, 12 (36.4%) patients demonstrated right-sided laterality, while 21 (63.6%) patients demonstrated left-sided laterality. Clinically, this anatomic variant has been utilized in several cases of autologous breast reconstruction with flap survival in all cases.

CONCLUSION

 Utilization of this anatomic variant in stacked or dual-pedicled autologous breast reconstruction results in antegrade IMA perfusion of both primary and secondary flaps, as well as improved size match compared with other anastomotic options. Knowledge of the vascular anatomy and variations in the inferior epigastric system is crucial to both preventing complications and optimizing flap planning and outcome.

Options for revascularization: artery versus vein: technical considerations

Vascular grafts, as either interpositional conduits or bypass grafts, can be used for revascularization procedures in the upper extremity. Vein grafts are more readily available and can be easier to harvest. Arterial grafts may provide superior patency rates compared with vein grafts. Arterial grafts can be located and harvested with consistent and reliable anatomy throughout the body.

Arterial conduits for distal upper extremity bypass

Vascular bypass is an accepted surgical procedure for treatment of hand and digital ischemia that is the result of identifiable arterial disease. Although vein grafts have traditionally been used as vascular conduits for reconstruction, arterial grafts present a better alternative, physiologically, for reconstruction and may result in superior outcomes. Arteries suitable for grafts are not abundant and, therefore, upper extremity surgeons must be informed about possible donor sites and techniques for harvest.

A systematic review of the outcomes of distal upper extremity bypass surgery with arterial and venous conduits

PURPOSE

To conduct a systematic review of literature evaluating efficacy of venous and arterial grafts for distal upper extremity bypass surgery.

METHODS

A PubMed search using MeSH terms "veins/surgery" OR "arteries/surgery" AND "radial artery/surgery" OR "ulnar artery/surgery" yielded 794 studies. Manual review produced 42 studies based on inclusion criteria of reported distal upper extremity bypass surgery, complete information on graft type used, examined patency of reconstruction, and described method for determining patency. Studies meeting inclusion criteria underwent data extraction focusing on demographics, revascularization site, conduit type, microsurgical technique, subjective/objective outcomes, and postoperative anticoagulation regimens.

RESULTS

Sixteen studies met the inclusion criteria. In 145 patients, 152 grafts were performed for upper extremity revascularization, including 120 grafts for revascularization of distal ulnar artery circulation, 31 for distal radial artery circulation, and 1 for both distal ulnar and radial artery occlusions. Overall patency rate was 87% at an average follow-up of 34 months. Of 152 bypass grafts, 19 were arterial conduits. Donor sites included the deep inferior epigastric artery, subscapular artery, thoracodorsal artery, and descending branch of the lateral femoral circumflex artery. At a mean follow-up of 18 months, arterial conduit patency was 100%. The remaining 133 bypass procedures used vein grafts from various donor sites, including the saphenous, cephalic, and basilic veins. At an average follow-up of 37 months, overall vein graft patency rate was 85%. There was a statistically significant difference between patency rates of arterial conduits compared with venous conduits. All studies reported improved ischemic symptoms including reduction of cold sensitivity, pain, and digital ulceration.

CONCLUSIONS

This review showed a high patency rate and clinical efficacy of distal upper extremity bypass surgery with a mean follow-up of almost 3 years. There may be a benefit of using arterial versus venous conduits, although further examination is needed given the small number of arterial reconstructions reported.

Reconstruction of the ischemic hand

Ischemia of the hand remains an uncommon condition, but problems with arterial perfusion of the hand can arise from trauma (open and closed), thrombosis, or arteriovascular disease. Certain identifiable patterns are seen with hand ischemia, usually discernable according to which one of the major arteries (radial or ulnar) are involved. This article discusses the origin and management of ischemic hand conditions, with an emphasis on recognizing the patterns of ischemia that are commonly seen.

Vascular insufficiency of the upper extremity

Vascular insufficiency of the upper extremity can be due to acute vascular injury, chronic vasospastic disease, and occlusive disease. Its treatment requires a thorough understanding of the vascular anatomy of the upper extremity, diagnostic modalities, and medical and surgical management options. Promising advances continue to be made in surgical treatment and medical therapy.