How to diagnose and manage an acute Achilles tendon rupture

Treatment outcome at 1 year did not differ between use of cast or walker in the first 3 weeks after an acute Achilles tendon rupture. A registry study of 1304 patients from the Danish Achilles tendon database

BACKGROUND

The best choice of orthosis in the treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture is still under debate.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate if choice of orthosis in the first 3 weeks of treatment affected patient reported outcome (Achilles tendon Total Rupture Score (ATRS)), tendon elongation (Achilles Tendon Resting Angle (ATRA) and Heel Rise Height (HRH)) and re-rupture.

METHODS

Registry study in the Danish Achilles tendon Database. Patients treated with cast and patients treated with walker in the first 3 weeks of treatment were compared using a linear mixed-effects model adjusted for potential confounders.

RESULTS

1304 patients were included in the study. No clinically relevant difference was found: Adjusted mean difference (using walker the whole period as reference)(95% CI) ATRS after 1 year = 0.1(-3.0; 4.1), ATRS after 6 months = 2.0(-4.5; 5.8), ATRS after 2 years = 3.0(-0.7; 7.0), HRH difference = 0.6(-6.6; 8.2), ATRA difference = 0.03°(-1.5; 1.6), re-rupture(odds ratio) = 0.812(0.4; 1.61).

CONCLUSION

Patients treated with cast the first 3 weeks after acute Achilles tendon rupture did not have better treatment outcome than patients treated with walker.

Achilles' tendon rupture dancing the 'Jerusalema' - A case series

Introduction and importance

The weekend warrior has long been prey to musculoskeletal injuries as a result of intermittent, high intensity activity. The Achilles tendon is known to be particularly vulnerable in this population cohort but during the COVID-19 lockdowns in Ireland and all over the world there has been a certain level of detraining and deconditioning among all age groups and populations.

Throughout the worldwide restrictions, viral internet challenges and dances have encapsulated the spirit of a global community with the ‘Jerusalema’ dance being no exception. The rise of this particular viral sensation was at the detriment of the Achilles tendons of three middle aged gentlemen on who we base our case series.

Presentation of cases

Over the space of ten days three cases of Achilles tendon rupture repair presented to the emergency department in Midlands Regional Hospital Tullamore (MRHT) with the mechanism of tendon rupture being through the ‘Jerusalema’ dance.

These patients were surgically managed in line with local institution practice and postoperative outcomes were good with no complications noted. Follow up is ongoing.

Clinical discussion

This retrospective case series is based on the impact of the ‘Jerusalema Dance’ on presentations of Achilles tendon rupture to the Emergency Department in a single regional hospital from January to March 2021. We used these cases in conjunction with a review of current literature to highlight the benefit of an integrated Achilles Tendon rehabilitation programme in this at-risk patient cohort.

Conclusion

This paper highlights the dangers inherent when well intentioned, but physically deconditioned individuals endeavour to perform a physical exercise which is deceptively demanding. Going forward, viral challenges such as the ‘Jerusalema’ may contribute to new and interesting mechanisms of injuries in our ‘weekend warrior’ cohort. In addition to this, given the global deconditioning seen due to the COVID 19 pandemic and subsequent lockdowns we may see a higher rate of Achilles tendon injuries in the near future across a multitude of patient cohorts. Level one evidence suggests that conservative treatment is just as effective as surgical treatments in the majority of patients with an Achilles tendon rupture, as long as a protocol of rehabilitation with early weightbearing is performed. Our accelerated rehabilitation programme in MRHT is in line with others however internal audit and new literature in the future may enable us to refine it further.

•

Achilles Tendon Rupture is common amongst the conditioned and deconditioned population.

•

Surgical and conservative management options are widely explored in the literature.

•

Viral dance challenges such as the Jerusalema offer new and interesting patterns of injury.

•

An early weightbearing rehabilitation programme after TA rupture shows lower re-rupture rates.

Neglected complete bilateral achilles tendon rupture. clinical case presentation, treatment and follow-up

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE WORK

subcutaneous Achilles tendon lesions are common degenerative tendon tears, often related to sport activities, multiple pharmacotherapies and internal medical comorbidities. Neglect an Achilles tendon lesion can affect walk ability, while neglect a bilateral lesion could really lead to a serious limitation of self-sufficiency in daily living. We report a case of chronic bilateral Achilles tendon lesion successful treated with LARS augmentation, along with some clinical considerations concerning the clinical outcome.

METHODS

we report a case of a chronic bilateral Achilles tendon lesion in an elderly man with multiple comorbidities, successful treated with LARS reconstruction, along with some considerations concerning possible intraoperative issues and the clinical outcome.

RESULTS

good functional result was obtained as documented with pre and postoperative American Orthopedic Foot And Ankle Society Scale and the "Foot And Ankle Disability Index", without complications.

CONCLUSIONS

a bilateral Achilles tendon rupture is a very disabling pathology, that needs prompt diagnosis and treatment to prevent further complications. LARS reconstruction could be an effective method in selected patients to avoid some intraoperative issues related to patient comorbidities and ability to follow complex postoperative rehabilitation protocols. (www.actabiomedica.it).

Surgical versus conservative treatment following acute rupture of the Achilles tendon: is there a pedobarographic difference?

INTRODUCTION

Controversy remains regarding the optimal treatment method and postoperative rehabilitation of acute Achilles tendon ruptures. In this study, pedobarographic assessments of surgical and conservative treatments were compared.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A prospective assessment was made of 16 patients (eight surgical, eight conservative) and eight healthy controls using a plantar pressure measurement system. Biomechanical gait parameters were obtained using the Footscan dynamic gait analysis system. Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U-tests were used for the evaluation of data.

RESULTS

Nineteen males and five females were assessed, with an average age of 42.0±11.9 years. Follow-up was completed in 16 patients. No statistically significant difference was determined between the two treatment groups with regard to the gait analysis, but a difference was observed with the control group (P<0.001). All patients were able to resume their prior activities after 6 months and regained normal ranges of motion, with a high rate of satisfaction. Most of the patients (75%) were able to return to their pre-injury level of activities.

CONCLUSION

Satisfactory results were obtained through conservative treatment of acute ruptures of the Achilles tendon. No significant differences or complications were observed in the group managed conservatively versus the group treated surgically. Further studies including 3D gait analyses and tendon biomechanical research are required to further investigate this issue.

Dynamic techniques for clinical assessment of the athlete

Clinical diagnostic tests objectively evaluate lower extremity ailments of the athlete. The positive squeeze test is found to be reproducible for ankle syndesmotic injury but is a poor prognosticator. The anterior drawer and talar tilt tests assess lateral ankle sprains. These have limitations secondary to positioning and guarding by the athlete, so comparison with the asymptomatic extremity is recommended. The Ottawa ankle rules assess possible fractures of the ankle and midfoot. The Thompson test evaluates Achilles tendon tears, whereas the windlass technique and the modified Lachman test examine the integrity of the plantar fascia and metatarsophalangeal joint capsule.

Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture: a meta-analysis of randomized trials

BACKGROUND

Surgical repair is a common method of treatment of acute Achilles rupture in North America because, despite a higher risk of overall complications, it has been believed to offer a reduced risk of rerupture. However, more recent trials, particularly those using functional bracing with early range of motion, have challenged this belief. The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare surgical treatment and conservative treatment with regard to the rerupture rate, the overall rate of other complications, return to work, calf circumference, and functional outcomes, as well as to examine the effects of early range of motion on the rerupture rate.

METHODS

A literature search, data extraction, and quality assessment were conducted by two independent reviewers. Publication bias was assessed with use of the Egger and Begg tests. Heterogeneity was assessed with use of the I2 test, and fixed or random-effect models were used accordingly. Pooled results were expressed as risk ratios, risk differences, and weighted or standardized mean differences, as appropriate. Meta-regression was employed to identify causes of heterogeneity. Subgroup analysis was performed to assess the effect of early range of motion.

RESULTS

Ten studies met the inclusion criteria. If functional rehabilitation with early range of motion was employed, rerupture rates were equal for surgical and nonsurgical patients (risk difference = 1.7%, p = 0.45). If such early range of motion was not employed, the absolute risk reduction achieved by surgery was 8.8% (p = 0.001 in favor of surgery). Surgery was associated with an absolute risk increase of 15.8% (p = 0.016 in favor of nonoperative management) for complications other than rerupture. Surgical patients returned to work 19.16 days sooner (p = 0.0014). There was no significant difference between the two treatments with regard to calf circumference (p = 0.357), strength (p = 0.806), or functional outcomes (p = 0.226).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the meta-analysis demonstrate that conservative treatment should be considered at centers using functional rehabilitation. This resulted in rerupture rates similar to those for surgical treatment while offering the advantage of a decrease in other complications. Surgical repair should be preferred at centers that do not employ early-range-of-motion protocols as it decreased the rerupture risk in such patients.