Botulinum Toxin for the Treatment of Temporomandibular Joint Disk Disfigurement: Clinical Experience

Lateral pterygoid muscle ultrasound-guided injection: A technical note

BACKGROUND

Temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) are a frequent cause of orofacial pain, causing functional disability and a negative impact on quality of life. Botulinum toxin (BTX-A) injection in lateral pterygoid muscle (LPM) is one of the treatment modalities proposed, but the blind puncture guided by EMG carries a risk of vascular puncture or diffusion of the toxin to nearby muscles. We describe an ultrasound-guided approach and evaluate the spread of the injection in a fresh human cadaver.

METHODS

A fresh human cadaver was injected. An out-of-plane approach was performed using a convex probe, injecting 1.0 ml of 0.25% methylene blue dye into the LPM. After, a dissection was performed to isolate the lateral pterygoid muscle and assess the spread of the dye.

RESULTS

Ultrasound-guided injection allowed to visualize in real-time the spread of the dye within the LPM. The deep and superficial muscles nearby to LPM were not stained by the dye, but upper and lower head of LPM was heavily stained.

CONCLUSION

Ultrasound-guided approach for the injection of BTX-A into the LPM could be considered a successful and safe treatment for myofascial pain related to TMD. Therefore, further clinical studies are needed to study the reproducibility of ultrasound guided LPM injection and to evaluate the clinical results.

IncobotulinumtoxinA in refractory temporomandibular disorder due to disk dislocation: A prospective study

INTRODUCTION

Temporomandibular disorders (TMD) may include conditions involving the temporomandibular joint and/or masticatory muscles. Approximately 20 % of patients are refractory to first-line therapies. This study aims to evaluate the effects and safety of incobotulinumtoxinA in the treatment of refractory TMD due to disk dislocation.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A quasi-experimental one-arm prospective study was conducted. Target population included individuals with a diagnosis of TMD due to disk dislocation. Patients were treated with electromyography or ultrasound guided injection of incobotulinumtoxinA in the masticatory muscles (20 U into each masseter and pterygoideus lateralis). Pain was assessed using the pain numerical rating scale, maximum unassisted mouth opening was measured in mm, and adverse events were registered at baseline, week 4, week 12 and week 24 post-treatment. Statistical analysis used the Wilcoxon test for the comparison of paired samples and the Mann-Whitney U test for independent samples, considering a p-value ≤ 0.05 as significant.

RESULTS

51 patients with 75 painful temporomandibular joints due to disk dislocation (38 with reduction and 37 without) were included. A significant reduction in pain from a pre-treatment mean of 6.08/10 to a post-treatment mean of 2.04/10 (week 4), 3.18/10 (week 12), and 3.65/10 (week 24) was observed (p < 0.001). A significant decrease in maximum unassisted mouth opening from a pre-treatment mean of 36.45 mm to a post-treatment mean of 32.29 mm at week 4 was observed (p < 0.001).

DISCUSSION

Botulinum toxin injection of the masticatory muscles is safe and seems equally effective in reducing pain in patients with refractory TMD due to disk dislocation.

Hypnosis in the treatment of retrograde cricopharyngeus dysfunction: A case report

Retrograde cricopharyngeus dysfunction (R-CPD) causes an inability to belch. This case report describes the successful treatment of R-CPD with the use of hypnosis. Thereafter, the patient was able to burp small amounts of air, and was encouraged to continue his use of hypnosis as needed. Hypnosis and possibly other noninvasive treatments should be used for R-CPD before employment of more invasive and costly treatments such as botulinum toxin administration.

Preliminary Findings of the Efficacy of Botulinum Toxin in Temporomandibular Disorders: Uncontrolled Pilot Study

Temporomandibular disorders are a common pathology affecting up to 70% of the population, with a maximum incidence in young patients. We used a sample of twenty patients recruited in the Maxillofacial Surgery Service of the University Hospital of Salamanca (Spain), who met the inclusion criteria, with unilateral painful symptomatology of more than three months' duration. All patients were randomly treated by intramuscular and intra-articular injections of botulinum toxin (100 U) in eight predetermined points. Pain symptomatology was assessed by the visual analog scale (VAS) at the different locations, together with joint symptomatology, at baseline and six weeks after treatment. Adverse effects were also evaluated. In 85% of the patients, pain upon oral opening improved and 90% showed improvement in pain upon mastication. A total of 75% of the patients reported improvement in joint clicking/noise. Headaches improved or disappeared in 70% of the patients treated. Despite the limitations of the study and the preliminary results, intramuscular and intra-articular infiltrations with botulinum toxin were effective in the treatment of symptoms associated with temporomandibular disorders (TMDs), with minimal adverse effects.

The effects of botulinum toxin A injection on the lateral pterygoid muscle in patients with a painful temporomandibular joint click: a randomized clinical trial study

Background

Temporomandibular disorder (TMD) is the main cause of non-dental pain in orofacial area. The most common symptoms of TMD are joint pain, joint sound and limitation of jaw function. Botulinum toxin (BTX) injection is considered a potential treatment for TMD due to its pain-relieving properties and its ability to reduce muscle activity. Most of the studies are case series and further investigations are required to prove the efficacy of this treatment modality. Thus, in this study, we aimed to investigate the effect of BTX-A injection on the lateral pterygoid (LP) muscle and to evaluate its efficacy regarding TMD.

Materials and methods

Thirty-eight patients (19 women and 19 men; mean age of 26.53 years) with painful unilateral temporomandibular joint click and LP muscle tenderness were enrolled in this study. They were divided into two groups; one received an extraoral BTX-A injection in the LP muscle, and the other received a placebo injection. Pain severity, jaw movements, click severity, and Helkimo index were recorded at the first visit, as well as one week, one month, and three months after the intervention. Data were analyzed using repeated-measures analysis of variance and t-tests.

Results

The results showed that click severity was not significantly different between the BTX-A and placebo groups (P = 0.07). Pain and Helkimo index decreased significantly in the BTX group (P = 0.00 and P = 0.006, respectively); however, there was no significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.22 and P = 1, respectively). There was a significant difference in lateral movements between the groups (P = 0.00) but not in protrusive movement (P = 0.095).

Conclusions

It can be concluded that although some studies have stated that BTX injection can make the click sound disappear, in this study, we did not find a significant difference between the two groups. Furthermore, our results showed that click and pain severity decreased, but the difference was not statistically significant. Therefore, further studies with a higher dosage of BTX and more participants are recommended.

Trial registration The local Ethics Committee of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences approved this research (IR.SUMS.REC. 01/10/2018 and IRCT20130521013406N3).

Temporal Tendinitis in Craniomandibular Dysfunction (CMD) - Does it Really Exist? A Temporomandibular MRI Investigation

OBJECTIVES

 The aim of the study was to analyze the role of temporal muscle and particularly tendon pathology in patients suffering from craniomandibular dysfunction (CMD) using magnetic resonance imaging.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

 Retrospective analysis of MRI examinations was carried out with regard to temporal muscle fibrosis and fatty degeneration and particularly temporal tendon rupture, thickening, and degenerative signal alterations. Descriptive statistics and the Mann-Whitney U-test were used for statistical evaluation.

RESULTS

 Structural lesions of temporal muscle parenchyma were the absolute exception. PD hyperintensity, pronounced contrast enhancement, or peritendinous fluid collections along the temporal tendon were found only to a small extent, and a (partial) rupture occurred in only one case. The tendon diameter showed only slight variability. The Mann-Whitney U-test provided no results indicating a causal connection between degenerative joint or disc disease and temporal tendon pathology.

CONCLUSION

 A large sample of 128 magnetic resonance imaging examinations provided no evidence of a major role of temporal tendinitis in clinical CMD syndrome.

KEY POINTS

  · Retrospective analysis of temporal tendon in CMD patients.. · Abnormal structural findings along the tendon seen only rarely.. · Obviously no crucial role of temporal tendon lesions in CMD syndrome..

CITATION FORMAT

· Stimmer H, Grill F, Waschulzik B et al. Temporal Tendinitis in Craniomandibular Dysfunction (CMD) - Does it Really Exist? A Temporomandibular MRI Investigation. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2022; DOI: 10.1055/a-1829-6134.

A Novel Injection Technique to the Lateral Pterygoid Muscle for Temporomandibular Disorders: A Cadaveric Study

BACKGROUND

Lateral pterygoid muscle activity is associated with the pathological mechanisms of some temporomandibular disorders. The authors aimed to define and demonstrate a novel, practical, and safe technique for botulinum toxin type A injection to the lateral pterygoid muscle based on their findings. Their secondary aims were to standardize the injection pattern according to the variations of the lateral pterygoid muscle and its surrounding anatomical structures, and to establish its advantages over intraoral injection.

METHODS

Twenty cadaver heads were dissected. The lateral pterygoid muscle and its surrounding structures were investigated for anatomical variations. Based on these findings, a standardized extraoral injection protocol was defined and compared with the intraoral technique for accuracy and safety.

RESULTS

The average depth of the lateral pterygoid plate from the skin surface was 49.9 ± 2.2 mm, and the mean width of the lateral pterygoid plate was 10.5 ± 3.9 mm. The extraoral injection approach based on the location of the maxillary tuberosity, tragus, and lateral pterygoid plate was consistent in all dissections for the accuracy of the intramuscular injection. In the intraoral approach, standardization of the entry point of the needle through the oral mucosa is difficult, which makes adjustment of the depth of the injection challenging while increasing the risk of neurovascular injury.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical significance of the lateral pterygoid muscle makes it worthwhile to implement minimally invasive treatments before considering more invasive options. The authors define a safe, accurate, and reliable approach with ease of administration in patients with temporomandibular disorders.

Effect of injection of botulinum toxin on decreasing the symptoms and signs of masticatory muscles in patients with temporomandibular dysfunction

Background. Temporomandibular joint dysfunction (TMD) is a term that describes problems in the masticatory system, including the temporomandibular joint, the dento-muscular system and the supporting bones. Injection of botulinum toxin, as a noninvasive technique, might be useful in decreasing symptoms such as muscular spasm, dystonia, migraine headaches and TMD. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of injection of botulinum toxin on decreasing the symptoms and signs of masticatory muscles in patients with TMD.

Methods. A total of 61 patients were consecutively included in the present study in 2016‒2017. All the subjects received a 50-unit injection of Dysport botulinum toxin in the masseter muscles using an extraoral injection technique. The results of the injection were evaluated in terms of pain severity using VAS, clinical evaluations of the joint click through palpation and by determining the inter-incisal distance. The patients underwent follow-up examinations at 1-week, 3-month and 6-month intervals after injection. Data were analyzed with appropriate statistical tests.

Results. Comparison of pain severity and articular clicks at different intervals showed decreases in these parameters over time, with significant differences between the time intervals (P<0.05). Comparison of mouth opening at different intervals showed increases in mouth opening over time.

Conclusion. The results of the present study showed that injection of botulinum toxin can be used in patients with TMD as a non-invasive treatment modality

Botulinum toxin in the treatment of muscle specific Oro-facial pain: a literature review

Facial pain associated with temporomandibular joint (TMJ) and surrounding structures has been a challenge to clinicians as far as diagnosis and management is concerned. Complexity of anatomical structures within a small area, function of teeth and surrounding periodontal ligament, action of muscles, pathologies, lack of diagnostic investigations, all these complicate specific diagnosis of TMJ disorders. Various classifications have been designed and studied to help diagnose and treat TMJ related disorders, of which the simplest one is pain from TMJ proper and surrounding muscles. Many treatment modalities to treat pain arising from muscles around TMJ like splints, mouth restriction exercises, injection of sclerosing agents etc. have been used with various degrees of success. Botulinum toxin has been shown to be effective in the treatment of oro-facial pain due to muscular disorders and the same is discussed in detail in this review literature.

Botulinum toxin assessment, intervention and aftercare for paediatric and adult niche indications including pain: international consensus statement

Evidence is emerging for the use of botulinum neurotoxin type-A (BoNT-A) for niche indications including pain independent of spasticity. Pain indications such as chronic nociceptive back pain, piriformis syndrome, chronic myofascial pain, pelvic pain, complex regional pain syndrome, facial pain and neuropathic pain are outlined in this paper. Of these, class I evidence is available for the treatment of chronic nociceptive low back pain, piriformis syndrome, myofascial pain, facial pain, neuropathic pain and plantar fasciitis. Peri-operative use of BoNT-A is emerging, with indications including planning for surgery and facilitating surgery, as well as healing and improving analgesia post-operatively. Evidence is limited, although there are some reports that clinicians are successfully using BoNT-A peri-operatively. There is class I evidence showing pre-operative use of BoNT-A has a beneficial effect on outcomes following adductor-release surgery. The use of BoNT for treatment of tremor, other than neck tremor in the setting of cervical dystonia, including evidence for upper limb tremor, cranial tremor and non-dystonic neck tremor is reviewed. The evidence is variable at this stage, and further study is required to develop definitive recommendations for the clinical utility of BoNT-A for these indications.

Efficacy of botulinum toxin in treating myofascial pain in bruxers: a controlled placebo pilot study

The present investigation is a preliminary double-blind, controlled placebo, randomized clinical trial with a six month follow-up period. The study aimed to assess the efficacy of type A botulinum toxin (Botox, Allergan, Inc. Irvine, CA) to treat myofascial pain symptoms and to reduce muscle hyperactivity in bruxers. Twenty patients (ten males, ten females; age range 25-45) with a clinical diagnosis of bruxism and myofascial pain of the masticatory muscles were enrolled in a double-blind, controlled placebo, randomized clinical trial, with a treatment group (ten subjects treated with botulinum toxin injections- BTX-A) and a control group (ten subjects treated with saline placebo injections). A number of objective and subjective clinical parameters (pain at rest and during chewing; mastication efficiency; maximum nonassisted and assisted mouth opening, protrusive and laterotrusive movements; functional limitation during usual jaw movements; subjective efficacy of the treatment; tolerance of the treatment) were assessed at baseline time and at one week, one month, and six months follow-up appointments. Descriptive analysis showed that improvements in both objective (range of mandibular movements) and subjective (pain at rest; pain during chewing) clinical outcome variables were higher in the Botox treated group than in the placebo treated subjects. Patients treated with BTX-A had a higher subjective improvement in their perception of treatment efficacy than the placebo subjects. Differences were not significant in some cases due to the small sample size. Results from the present study supported the efficacy of BTX-A to reduce myofascial pain symptoms in bruxers, and provided pilot data which need to be confirmed by further research using larger samples.

The therapeutic use of botulinum toxin in cervical and maxillofacial conditions: an evidence-based review

INTRODUCTION

The role of botulinum toxin as a therapeutic agent for several conditions is expanding. We sought to determine if botulinum toxin is safe and effective in treating patients with cervical dystonia and maxillofacial conditions. Our purpose was to establish a safety and efficacy profile to determine whether or not this treatment may be used prophylactically in patients undergoing dental implant therapy.

METHODS

We performed a systematic search of the literature to identify randomized clinical trials evaluating patients treated with botulinum toxin as an adjunct to dental implant therapy, maxillofacial conditions including temporomandibular disorders (TMD), and cervical dystonia.

RESULTS

Four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) met our search criteria in the area of cervical dystonia and chronic facial pain. No RCTs were identified evaluating dental implant therapy. Patients with cervical dystonia exhibited significant improvements in baseline functional, pain, and global assessments compared to placebo. Adverse events were mild and transient with numbers needed to harm (NNH) ranging from 12 to 17. Patients with chronic facial pain improved significantly from baseline in terms of pain compared to placebo. Rates of adverse events were less than 1%.

CONCLUSION

Botulinum toxin appears relatively safe and effective in treating cervical dystonia and chronic facial pain associated with masticatory hyperactivity. No literature exists evaluating its use in dental implantology. Randomized clinical trials are warranted to determine its safety and efficacy in dental implantology and other maxillofacial conditions such as bruxism.

Botulinum Toxin in Closed Treatment of Mandibular Condylar Fracture

BACKGROUND

The topic of condylar injury in adults has generated more discussion and controversy than any other in the field of maxillofacial trauma. The treatment of condylar fractures in adults is still a highly debated theme.

METHODS

Patients with unilateral subcondylar or condylar neck fractures of the mandibula without any significant angulation of the condylar head were managed with closed-treatment protocol. Closed treatment was applied through the injection of 100 units of botulinum toxin A, diluted to a concentration of 20 IU/mL, into the muscles of mastication of the fractured side. Masseter and anterior fibers of temporalis muscles were reached through percutaneous extraoral route and 30 IU of the toxin was injected to each muscle. Additional 40 IU of the toxin was injected around the fractured bone fragments through transmucosal intraoral route to paralyze medial and lateral pterygoid muscles as much as possible. An asymmetric occlusal splint was applied for maxillomandibular fixation to restore the vertical height for 10 days. Functional therapy with intermaxillary guiding elastics was advocated for 2 months.

RESULTS

There were no complications related to either toxin injections or splint application procedures. The toxin was effective on all occasions. Fractured condylar process and ramus of the mandibula were in good approximation and remained in reduced positions. None of the patients had any occlusal disturbance, mandibular asymmetry, or joint dysfunction in the follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

We believe that modification of treatment options concerning the clinical situation of the patients is the best method for condylar injury. The purpose of this study is to present and discuss the results achieved in closed treatment of a selected group of patients with mandibular condylar fractures to whom botulinum toxin A was injected to relieve the spasm of muscles of mastication, along with special splint application.

A critical review of the use of botulinum toxin in orofacial pain disorders

This article reviews the appropriate use, cautions, and contraindication for botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) and reviews the peer-reviewed literature that describes its efficacy for treatment of various chronic orofacial pain disorders. The literature has long suggested that BoNT is of value for orofacial hyperactivity and more recently for some orofacial pain disorders; however, the results are not as promising for orofacial pain. The available data from randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials (RBCTs) do not support the use of BoNT as a substantially better therapy than what is being used already. The one exception is that BoNT has reasonable RBCT data to support its use as a migraine prophylaxis therapy. The major caveat is that the use of BoNT in chronic orofacial pain is "off-label".