Exploring the Impact of Entrustable Professional Activities on Feedback Culture: A Qualitative Study of Anesthesiology Residents and Attendings

"Doing well": Intraoperative entrustable professional activity assessments provided limited technical feedback

Background

Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) allow for the assessment of specific, observable, essential tasks in medical education. Since being developed in non-surgical fields, EPA assessments have been implemented in surgery to explore intraoperative entrustment. However, assessment burden is a significant problem for faculty, and it is unknown whether EPA assessments enable formative technical feedback. EPAs' formative utility could inform how surgical programs facilitate technical feedback for trainees. We aimed to assess the extent to which narrative comments provided through the Fellowship Council (FC) EPA assessments contained technical feedback.

Methods

The FC previously collected EPA assessments for subspecialty surgical fellows from September 2020 to October 2022. Two raters reviewed assessments' narrative comments for inclusion of each skill area that makes up part of the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS). A third rater reconciled discrepant ratings.

Results

During the study period, there were 3302 completed EPA assessments, including 1191 fellow self-assessments, 1124 faculty assessments, and 987 assessments without an identified assessor role. We found that assessments' narrative comments related to a median of two of the seven OSATS areas (IQR:1-2). There were no comments relevant to any of the seven OSATS areas in 16.0 % of all assessments.

Conclusions

In this review of narrative comments for EPA assessments from the FC, we found that limited technical feedback of the kind included in the OSATS was provided in many assessments. These results suggest benefit to adjusting the EPA form, enhancing faculty development, or continuing additional types of targeted technical assessment intraoperatively.

Key message

This analysis of narrative comments from fellowship EPA assessments showed that many assessments included limited technical feedback. To allow for continued technical feedback for fellows, these results highlight the need for further refinements of the EPA assessment form, additional faculty development, or ongoing use of other types of technical assessment.

"Discovering shine through feedback seeking"---feedback seeking among new graduate nurses: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND

Feedback is critical to improving practitioners' clinical practice and professional growth. Although they are still considered junior practitioners, their feedback-seeking experiences have yet to be investigated. This study aimed to understand the fundamental thoughts and experiences of new graduate nurses regarding feedback-seeking and to identify the main factors that influence their feedback-seeking behaviors.

METHODS

Conducting a descriptive phenomenological study, semi-structured in-depth interviews with newly graduated nurses from four hospitals in Zhejiang Province, China, face-to-face or via video call in the hospital conference room through purposive and snowball sampling. Interview data were evaluated using Colaizzi's 7-step phenomenological data analysis. The COREQ checklist was followed.

RESULTS

A total of 15 new graduate nurses were interviewed as a sample, and 13 categories emerged from our data. They were categorized into four central elements: (1) perceptions and attitudes, (2) drivers, (3) dilemmas and needs, and (4) transformation and growth.

CONCLUSIONS

This study found that new graduate nurses have various needs but face dilemmas in the feedback-seeking process. Nursing managers should be proficient at providing positive leadership, collaborating with clinical mentors to foster an atmosphere where new graduate nurses may obtain honest, transparent, and fair feedback, and exercising caution when providing negative feedback.