1
|
Shearer RD, Bart G, Beebe TJ, Virnig BA, Shippee ND, Winkelman TNA. Cross sectional analysis of an addiction consultation service, substance co-use patterns, and receipt of medications for opioid use disorder during hospitalization. JOURNAL OF SUBSTANCE USE AND ADDICTION TREATMENT 2024; 167:209505. [PMID: 39241929 DOI: 10.1016/j.josat.2024.209505] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2024] [Revised: 06/19/2024] [Accepted: 08/27/2024] [Indexed: 09/09/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Despite effective medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD), treatment engagement remains low. As the overdose crisis is increasingly characterized by opioids co-used with other substances, it is important to understand whether existing models effectively support treatment for patients who use multiple substances. Hospital-based addiction consultation services (ACS) have shown promise at increasing MOUD initiation and treatment engagement, but the effectiveness for patients with specific co-use patterns remains unknown. METHODS Using 2016-2023 admissions data from a large safety net hospital, we estimated a random-effects logistic regression model to determine whether specific co-use (methamphetamine, cocaine, alcohol, sedative, and other) moderated the effect of being seen by ACS on the receipt of MOUD. Adjusting for patient sociodemographic, health, and admission characteristics we estimated the proportion of patients who received MOUD across specific co-use groups. RESULTS Of 7679 total admissions indicating opioid use, of which 5266 (68.6 %) indicated co-use of one or more substances and 2387 (31.1 %) were seen by the ACS. Among admissions not seen by the ACS, a smaller proportion of admissions with any co-use received MOUD (23.5 %; 95 % CI: 21.9-25.1) compared to admissions with opioid use alone (34.0 %; 95 % CI: 31.9-36.1). However, among admissions seen by the ACS a similar proportion of admissions with any co-use received MOUD (57.8 %; 95 % CI: 55.5-60.1) as admissions with opioid use alone (56.2 %; 95 % CI: 52.2-60.2). The increase in proportion of admissions receiving MOUD associated with being seen by the ACS was larger for admissions with methamphetamine (38.6 percentage points; 95 % CI: 34.6-42.6) or cannabis co-use (39.0 percentage points; 95 % CI: 32.9-45.1) compared to admissions without methamphetamine (25.7 percentage points; 95 % CI: 22.2-29.2) or cannabis co-use (29.1 percentage points; 95 % CI: 26.1-32.1). CONCLUSIONS The ACS is an effective hospital-based treatment model for increasing the proportion of admissions which receive MOUD. This study shows that ACSs are also able to support increased receipt of MOUD for patients who use other substances in addition to opioids. Future research is needed to further understand what transition strategies best support treatment linkage for patients who use multiple substances.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Riley D Shearer
- University of Minnesota School of Public Health, 420 Delaware St SE, Mayo Building B681, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA; Health, Homelessness, and Criminal Justice Lab, Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute, 701 Park Ave., Suite PP7.700, Minneapolis, MN 55415, USA.
| | - Gavin Bart
- Division of Addiction Medicine, Department of Medicine, Hennepin Healthcare, 900 S 8(th) St, Minneapolis, MN 55415, USA
| | - Timothy J Beebe
- University of Minnesota School of Public Health, 420 Delaware St SE, Mayo Building B681, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
| | - Beth A Virnig
- College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, 1225 Center Drive, Gainsville, FL 32611, USA
| | - Nathan D Shippee
- University of Minnesota School of Public Health, 420 Delaware St SE, Mayo Building B681, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
| | - Tyler N A Winkelman
- Health, Homelessness, and Criminal Justice Lab, Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute, 701 Park Ave., Suite PP7.700, Minneapolis, MN 55415, USA; Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Hennepin Healthcare, 716 S 7(th) St, Minneapolis, MN 55415, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
McNeely J, Wang SS, Rostam Abadi Y, Barron C, Billings J, Tarpey T, Fernando J, Appleton N, Fawole A, Mazumdar M, Weinstein ZM, Kalyanaraman Marcello R, Dolle J, Cooke C, Siddiqui S, King C. Addiction Consultation Services for Opioid Use Disorder Treatment Initiation and Engagement: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Intern Med 2024; 184:1106-1115. [PMID: 39073796 PMCID: PMC11287446 DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.3422] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2024] [Accepted: 05/29/2024] [Indexed: 07/30/2024]
Abstract
Importance Medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) are highly effective, but only 22% of individuals in the US with opioid use disorder receive them. Hospitalization potentially provides an opportunity to initiate MOUD and link patients to ongoing treatment. Objective To study the effectiveness of interprofessional hospital addiction consultation services in increasing MOUD treatment initiation and engagement. Design, Setting, and Participants This pragmatic stepped-wedge cluster randomized implementation and effectiveness (hybrid type 1) trial was conducted in 6 public hospitals in New York, New York, and included 2315 adults with hospitalizations identified in Medicaid claims data between October 2017 and January 2021. Data analysis was conducted in December 2023. Hospitals were randomized to an intervention start date, and outcomes were compared during treatment as usual (TAU) and intervention conditions. Bayesian analysis accounted for the clustering of patients within hospitals and open cohort nature of the study. The addiction consultation service intervention was compared with TAU using posterior probabilities of model parameters from hierarchical logistic regression models that were adjusted for age, sex, and study period. Eligible participants had an admission or discharge diagnosis of opioid use disorder or opioid poisoning/adverse effects, were hospitalized at least 1 night in a medical/surgical inpatient unit, and were not receiving MOUD before hospitalization. Interventions Hospitals implemented an addiction consultation service that provided inpatient specialty care for substance use disorders. Consultation teams comprised a medical clinician, social worker or addiction counselor, and peer counselor. Main Outcomes and Measures The dual primary outcomes were (1) MOUD treatment initiation during the first 14 days after hospital discharge and (2) MOUD engagement for the 30 days following initiation. Results Of 2315 adults, 628 (27.1%) were female, and the mean (SD) age was 47.0 (12.4) years. Initiation of MOUD was 11.0% in the Consult for Addiction Treatment and Care in Hospitals (CATCH) program vs 6.7% in TAU, engagement was 7.4% vs 5.3%, respectively, and continuation for 6 months was 3.2% vs 2.4%. Patients hospitalized during CATCH had 7.96 times higher odds of initiating MOUD (log-odds ratio, 2.07; 95% credible interval, 0.51-4.00) and 6.90 times higher odds of MOUD engagement (log-odds ratio, 1.93; 95% credible interval, 0.09-4.18). Conclusions This randomized clinical trial found that interprofessional addiction consultation services significantly increased postdischarge MOUD initiation and engagement among patients with opioid use disorder. However, the observed rates of MOUD initiation and engagement were still low; further efforts are still needed to improve hospital-based and community-based services for MOUD treatment. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03611335.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer McNeely
- Department of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York
| | - Scarlett S. Wang
- New York University Robert F. Wagner Graduate School of Public Service, New York
| | - Yasna Rostam Abadi
- Department of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York
| | - Charles Barron
- Office of Behavioral Health, New York City Health + Hospitals, New York, New York
| | - John Billings
- New York University Robert F. Wagner Graduate School of Public Service, New York
| | - Thaddeus Tarpey
- Department of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York
| | - Jasmine Fernando
- Department of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York
| | - Noa Appleton
- Department of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York
| | - Adetayo Fawole
- Department of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York
| | - Medha Mazumdar
- Department of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York
| | - Zoe M. Weinstein
- Department of Medicine, Boston University Chobanian and Avedesian School of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Johanna Dolle
- Office of Population Health, New York City Health + Hospitals, New York, New York
| | - Caroline Cooke
- Office of Population Health, New York City Health + Hospitals, New York, New York
| | - Samira Siddiqui
- Office of Behavioral Health, New York City Health + Hospitals, New York, New York
| | - Carla King
- Department of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York
- Office of Behavioral Health, New York City Health + Hospitals, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Balmuth EA, Iyer S, Scales DA, Avery J. Perspectives and Recommendations from Hospitalized Patients with Substance Use Disorders: A Qualitative Study. J Gen Intern Med 2024; 39:2087-2096. [PMID: 38698295 PMCID: PMC11306722 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-024-08745-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2023] [Accepted: 03/25/2024] [Indexed: 05/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Individuals with substance use disorders (SUDs) are hospitalized in growing numbers. Stigma is pervasive among their hospital providers, and SUD management during medical admissions is often inadequate. However, little is known about how these patients perceive their care quality. In particular, few studies have explored their positive care perceptions or recommendations for improvement. OBJECTIVE To explore perspectives on positive aspects, negative aspects, and consequences of care, as well as recommendations for improvement among hospitalized patients with SUDs. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS We conducted semi-structured, in-depth bedside interviews (n = 15) with patients who have been diagnosed with a SUD and were admitted to medical or surgical floors of an urban academic medical center. APPROACH Interviews explored patients' hospital experiences and recommendations for improvement. The interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and imported into NVivo software. Two reviewers independently coded the transcripts using interpretative phenomenological analysis and inductive thematic analysis according to grounded theory, and recurring themes were identified from the data. Patients' demographic and clinical data were analyzed with descriptive statistics. KEY RESULTS Perceived clinical and emotional proficiency were the most important components of positive experiences, whereas perceived bias and stigmatized attitudes, clinical improficiency, and inhumane treatment were characteristic of negative experiences. Such care components were most consequential for patients' emotional well-being, trust, and care quality. Recommendations for improving care included specific suggestions for initiating and promoting continued recovery, educating, and partnering in compassionate care. CONCLUSIONS Hospitalized patients with SUDs often experience lower quality and less compassionate care linked to pervasive stigma and poor outcomes. Our study highlights under-recognized perspectives from this patient population, including socioemotional consequences of care and recommendations grounded in lived experiences. By striving to advance our care in accordance with patients' viewpoints, we can turn hospitalizations into opportunities for engagement and promoting recovery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sonali Iyer
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - David A Scales
- Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jonathan Avery
- Department of Psychiatry, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Danovitch I, Korouri S, Kaur H, Messineo G, Nuckols T, Ishak WW, Ober A. The addiction consultation service for hospitalized patients with substance use disorder: An integrative review of the evidence. JOURNAL OF SUBSTANCE USE AND ADDICTION TREATMENT 2024; 163:209377. [PMID: 38657952 DOI: 10.1016/j.josat.2024.209377] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2024] [Revised: 04/10/2024] [Accepted: 04/10/2024] [Indexed: 04/26/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The Addiction Consultation Service has emerged as a model of care for hospitalized patients with substance use disorder. The aim of this integrative review is to characterize the Addiction Consultation Service in general hospital settings, assess its impact on clinical outcomes, identify knowledge gaps, and offer guidance for implementation. METHODS We conducted an integrative review of studies from January 2002 to August 2023, applying specific inclusion criteria to collect study design, service characteristics, staffing models, utilization, and health outcomes. Additionally, a comprehensive quality appraisal was conducted for all studies considered for inclusion. RESULTS Findings from 41 studies meeting inclusion criteria were synthesized and tabulated. Study designs included six reports from three randomized controlled trials, five descriptive studies, and 30 observational studies. The most common study setting was the urban academic medical center. Studies evaluated the structure, process, and outcomes of the Addiction Consultation Service. A majority of studies, particularly those utilizing more rigorous designs, reported positive outcomes involving medication initiation, linkage to post-discharge care, and utilization outcomes. CONCLUSIONS The Addiction Consultation Service care model improves quality of care for hospitalized patients with substance use disorder. Additional research is needed to assess its effectiveness across diverse medical settings, determine the effectiveness of varying staffing models, demonstrate impactful outcomes, and establish funding mechanisms to support sustainability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Itai Danovitch
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90048, United States of America.
| | - Samuel Korouri
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90048, United States of America.
| | - Harlene Kaur
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90048, United States of America.
| | - Gabrielle Messineo
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90048, United States of America.
| | - Teryl Nuckols
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90048, United States of America; RAND Corporation, 1776 Main Street, Santa Monica, CA 90401, United States of America.
| | - Waguih W Ishak
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90048, United States of America.
| | - Allison Ober
- RAND Corporation, 1776 Main Street, Santa Monica, CA 90401, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Tatangelo M, Landry R, Beaulieu D, Watson C, Knowlan S, Anawati A, Bodson A, Aubin N, Marsh DC, Leary T, Morin KA. Association of hospital-based substance use supports on emergency department revisits: a retrospective cohort study in Sudbury, Canada from 2018 to 2022. Harm Reduct J 2024; 21:71. [PMID: 38549074 PMCID: PMC10976798 DOI: 10.1186/s12954-024-00985-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2023] [Accepted: 03/09/2024] [Indexed: 04/02/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study compares emergency department (ED) revisits for patients receiving hospital-based substance-use support compared to those who did not receive specialized addiction services at Health Sciences North in Sudbury, Ontario, Canada. METHODS The study is a retrospective observational study using administrative data from all patients presenting with substance use disorder (SUD) at Health Sciences North from January 1, 2018, and August 31, 2022 with ICD-10 codes from the Discharge Abstract Database (DAD) and the National Ambulatory Care Database (NACRS). There were two interventions under study: addiction medicine consult services (AMCS group), and specialized addiction medicine unit (AMU group). The AMCS is a consult service offered for patients in the ED and those who are admitted to the hospital. The AMU is a specialized inpatient medical unit designed to offer addiction support to stabilize patients that operates under a harm-reduction philosophy. The primary outcome was all cause ED revisit within 30 days of the index ED or hospital visit. The secondary outcome was all observed ED revisits in the study period. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to measure the proportion of 30-day revisits by exposure group. Odds ratios and Hazard Ratios were calculated using logistic regression models with random effects and Cox-proportional hazard model respectively. RESULTS A total of 5,367 patients with 10,871 ED index visits, and 2,127 revisits between 2018 and 2022 are included in the study. 45% (2,340/5,367) of patient were not admitted to hospital. 30-day revisits were less likely among the intervention group: Addiction Medicine Consult Services (AMCS) in the ED significantly reduced the odds of revisits (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.39-0.71, p < 0.01) and first revisits (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.33-0.53, p < 0.01). The AMU group was associated with lower revisits odds (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.66-0.98, p = 0.03). For every additional year of age, the odds of revisits slightly decreased (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.98-1.00, p = 0.01) and males were found to have an increased risk compared to females (OR 1.50, 95% CI 1.35-1.67, p < 0.01). INTERPRETATION We observe statistically significant differences in ED revisits for patients receiving hospital-based substance-use support at Health Sciences North. Hospital-based substance-use supports could be applied to other hospitals to reduce 30-day revisits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Tatangelo
- Health Science North, Sudbury, ON, Canada
- ICES North, Sudbury, ON, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | - Alex Anawati
- Health Science North, Sudbury, ON, Canada
- Dr. Gilles Arcand Centre for Health Equity, Sudbury, ON, Canada
| | | | - Natalie Aubin
- Health Science North, Sudbury, ON, Canada
- Laurentian University, Sudbury, ON, Canada
| | - David C Marsh
- Health Science North, Sudbury, ON, Canada
- ICES North, Sudbury, ON, Canada
- Dr. Gilles Arcand Centre for Health Equity, Sudbury, ON, Canada
- Northern Ontario School of Medicine University, Sudbury, ON, Canada
- Laurentian University, Sudbury, ON, Canada
| | - Tara Leary
- Health Science North, Sudbury, ON, Canada
- Northern Ontario School of Medicine University, Sudbury, ON, Canada
| | - Kristen A Morin
- Health Science North, Sudbury, ON, Canada.
- ICES North, Sudbury, ON, Canada.
- Dr. Gilles Arcand Centre for Health Equity, Sudbury, ON, Canada.
- Northern Ontario School of Medicine University, Sudbury, ON, Canada.
- Laurentian University, Sudbury, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Shearer RD, Shippee ND, Virnig BA, Beebe TJ, Winkelman TN. Characteristics and co-morbidities associated with hospital discharges for opioid and methamphetamine co-use, United States 2016-2019. DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE REPORTS 2024; 10:100219. [PMID: 38356919 PMCID: PMC10864835 DOI: 10.1016/j.dadr.2024.100219] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2024] [Accepted: 02/02/2024] [Indexed: 02/16/2024]
Abstract
Introduction The US overdose crisis is increasingly characterized by opioid and methamphetamine co-use. Hospitalization is an important opportunity to engage patients in substance use treatment. Understanding characteristics of co-use-related hospital stays can inform the development of services to better support this growing patient population. Methods We used 2016-2019 National Inpatient Sample data to conduct a cross sectional analysis of hospitalizations involving use of opioids, methamphetamine, or both. We used bivariate analysis to compare patient demographics. We then used multinomial logistic regressions to compare the proportion of hospital stays which indicated co-morbid diagnosis. To account for correlated data, we used generalized linear models to compare outcomes in hospital mortality, patient-directed discharge, and length of stay. Results Co-use-related stays had a higher proportion of co-morbid mental health (60.7%; 95% CI: 59.9-61.4%) and infectious diseases (41.5%; 95% CI: 40.8-42.2%), than opioid- or methamphetamine-related stays. Co-use-related stays increased between 2016 and 2019 and were associated with a higher proportion of patient directed discharge (10.7%; 95% CI: 10.4-11.0%) and longer length of stay (6.3 days; 95% CI: 6.2-6.4 days) compared to opioid (8.1%; 95% CI: 7.9-8.3% and 5.8 days; 95% CI: 5.8-5.9 days) and methamphetamine-related stays (6.5%; 95% CI: 6.3-6.6% and 5.5 days; 95% CI: 5.4-5.5 days). Conclusion Patients discharged with co-use differ from patients with opioid or methamphetamine use alone, representing a range of challenges and opportunities. In addition to offering treatment for both substance use disorders, hospital-based services that address co-occurring conditions may better support patients with co-use through targeted and tailored approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Riley D. Shearer
- University of Minnesota School of Public Health, 420 Delaware St SE, Mayo Building B681, Minneapolis, MN, 55455 USA
- Health, Homelessness, and Criminal Justice Lab, Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute, 701 Park Ave., Suite PP7.700, Minneapolis, MN, 55415, USA
| | - Nathan D. Shippee
- University of Minnesota School of Public Health, 420 Delaware St SE, Mayo Building B681, Minneapolis, MN, 55455 USA
| | - Beth A. Virnig
- College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, 1225 Center Drive, Gainsville, FL, 32611, USA
| | - Timothy J. Beebe
- University of Minnesota School of Public Health, 420 Delaware St SE, Mayo Building B681, Minneapolis, MN, 55455 USA
| | - Tyler N.A. Winkelman
- Health, Homelessness, and Criminal Justice Lab, Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute, 701 Park Ave., Suite PP7.700, Minneapolis, MN, 55415, USA
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Hennepin Healthcare, 716 S 7th St, Minneapolis, MN, 55415, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Roberts K, Smith E, Sousa C, Young JE, Corley AG, Szczotka D, Sepanski A, Hartoch A. Centering persons who use drugs: addressing social determinants of health among patients hospitalized with substance use disorders. SOCIAL WORK IN HEALTH CARE 2024; 63:19-34. [PMID: 37929597 DOI: 10.1080/00981389.2023.2278777] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2023] [Accepted: 09/12/2023] [Indexed: 11/07/2023]
Abstract
Social workers have emerged as leaders within Addiction Consult Services (ACS) due to their ability to provide a wide range of services, from crisis work and brief therapeutic interventions to connecting patients to community resources. Many hospitals have implemented ACS to address the overdose crisis and the sharp rise in drug use-related infections, including skin and soft tissue infections, osteomyelitis, and endocarditis; a result of unaddressed systemic social determinants of health (SDOH). Yet, despite social workers being at the forefront of inpatient substance use work, little guidance exists regarding social work's role in leading person-centered addiction care and addressing SDOH in the hospital setting. The authors of this paper are licensed clinical social workers who have worked across five different health systems, engaging persons who use drugs (PWUD) in the context of an ACS. This paper examines five practice interventions of social work practice within hospitals that represent key points for innovation. Drawing on social work's unique commitments to social justice, strengths, and person-in-environment, these interventions operate within eco-social approaches to help us grapple more effectively with ways that health - and disease - are socially and economically produced by multiple interacting factors. We provide a clinical roadmap of interventions for social workers in hospital settings with PWUD to demonstrate how social work leadership within inpatient care models can help us better address the impacts of various intersecting SDOH on the care of PWUD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kate Roberts
- Graduate School of Social Work and Social Research, Bryn Mawr College, Bryn Mawr, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Emily Smith
- Michigan Opioid Collaboratived, University of Michigan Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Cindy Sousa
- Graduate School of Social Work and Social Research, Bryn Mawr College, Bryn Mawr, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - J Elaina Young
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Anna Grace Corley
- Addiction Medicine, Prisma Health Internal Medicine, Greenville, South Carolina, USA
| | - Darin Szczotka
- Michigan Opioid Collaboratived, University of Michigan Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Abby Sepanski
- Addiction Medicine, Prisma Health Internal Medicine, Greenville, South Carolina, USA
| | - Ashley Hartoch
- Psychiatry, Stanford Health Care, Palo Alto, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Morin KA, Ghartey K, Bodson A, Sirois A, Leary T. Evaluating an addiction medicine unit in Sudbury, Ontario Canada: a mixed-methods study protocol. BMC Health Serv Res 2023; 23:1366. [PMID: 38057899 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-10313-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2023] [Accepted: 11/10/2023] [Indexed: 12/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In response to the escalating global prevalence of substance use and the specific challenges faced in Northern Ontario, Canada, an Addiction Medicine Unit (AMU) was established at Health Sciences North (HSN) in Sudbury. This protocol outlines the approach for a comprehensive evaluation of the AMU, with the aim of assessing its impact on patient outcomes, healthcare utilization, and staff perspectives. METHODS We conducted a parallel mixed-method study that encompassed the analysis of single-center-level administrative health data and primary data collection, including a longitudinal observational study (target n = 1,200), pre- and post-admission quantitative interviews (target n = 100), and qualitative interviews (target n = 25 patients and n = 15 staff). We implemented a participatory approach to this evaluation, collaborating with individuals who possess lived or living expertise in drug use, frontline staff, and decision-makers across the hospital. Data analysis methods encompass a range of statistical techniques, including logistic regression models, Cox proportional hazards models, Kaplan-Meier curves, Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE), and thematic qualitative analysis, ensuring a robust evaluation of patient outcomes and healthcare utilization. DISCUSSION This protocol serves as the foundation for a comprehensive assessment designed to provide insights into the AMU's effectiveness in addressing substance use-related challenges, reducing healthcare disparities, and improving patient outcomes. All study procedures have been meticulously designed to align with the ethical principles outlined in the Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans. The findings will be disseminated progressively through committees and working groups established for this research, and subsequently published in peer-reviewed journals. Anticipated outcomes include informing evidence-based healthcare decision-making and driving improvements in addiction treatment practices within healthcare settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristen A Morin
- Health Sciences North, Sudbury, ON, Canada.
- ICES North (Institute for Clinical and Evaluative Sciences), Sudbury, ON, Canada.
- Northern Ontario School of Medicine University, Sudbury, ON, Canada.
| | - Karla Ghartey
- University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Cambrian College, Sudbury, ON, Canada
| | | | - Alexandra Sirois
- Health Sciences North, Sudbury, ON, Canada
- Laurentian University, Sudbury, ON, Canada
| | - Tara Leary
- Health Sciences North, Sudbury, ON, Canada
- Northern Ontario School of Medicine University, Sudbury, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Cook RR, Jaworski EN, Hoffman KA, Waddell EN, Myers R, Korthuis PT, Vergara-Rodriguez P. Treatment Initiation, Substance Use Trajectories, and the Social Determinants of Health in Persons Living With HIV Seeking Medication for Opioid Use Disorder. Subst Abus 2023; 44:301-312. [PMID: 37842910 PMCID: PMC10830143 DOI: 10.1177/08897077231200745] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND People living with HIV and opioid use disorder (OUD) are disproportionally affected by adverse socio-structural exposures negatively affecting health, which have shown inconsistent associations with uptake of medications for OUD (MOUD). This study aimed to determine whether social determinants of health (SDOH) were associated with MOUD uptake and trajectories of substance use in a clinical trial of people seeking treatment. METHODS Data are from a 2018 to 2019 randomized trial comparing the effectiveness of different MOUD to achieve viral suppression among people living with HIV and OUD. SDOH were defined by variables mapping to Healthy People 2030 domains: education (Education Access and Quality), income (Economic Stability), homelessness (Neighborhood and Built Environment), criminal justice involvement (Social and Community Context), and recent SUD care (Health Care Access and Quality). Associations between SDOH and MOUD initiation were assessed with Cox proportional hazards models, and SDOH and substance use over time with generalized estimating equation models. RESULTS Participants (N = 114) averaged 47 years old, 63% were male, 56% were Black, and 12% Hispanic. Participants reported an average of 2.3 out of 5 positive SDOH indicators (SD = 1.2). Stable housing was the most commonly reported SDOH (61%), followed by no recent criminal justice involvement (59%), having a high-school level education or greater (56%), income stability (45%), and recent SUD care (13%). Each additional favorable SDOH was associated with a 25% increase in the likelihood of MOUD initiation during the study period [adjusted HR = 1.25, 95% CI = (1.01, 1.55), P = .044]. Positive SDOH were also associated with a decrease in the odds of baseline opioid use and a greater reduction in opioid use during subsequent weeks of the study (P < .001 for a joint test of baseline and slope differences). CONCLUSIONS Positive social determinants of health, in aggregate, may increase the likelihood of MOUD treatment initiation among people living with HIV and OUD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan R. Cook
- Department of Medicine, Section of Addiction Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland
| | - Erin N. Jaworski
- Center for Dissemination and Implementation Science, Department of Medicine, University of Illinois-Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Kim A. Hoffman
- Oregon Health and Science University-Portland State University School of Public Health, Portland
| | - Elizabeth N Waddell
- Oregon Health and Science University-Portland State University School of Public Health, Portland
| | - Renae Myers
- Department of Medicine, Section of Addiction Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland
| | - P. Todd Korthuis
- Department of Medicine, Section of Addiction Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Steel TL, Bhatraju EP, Hills-Dunlap K. Critical care for patients with substance use disorders. Curr Opin Crit Care 2023; 29:484-492. [PMID: 37641506 DOI: 10.1097/mcc.0000000000001080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/31/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To examine the impact of substance use disorders (SUDs) on critical illness and the role of critical care providers in treating SUDs. We discuss emerging evidence supporting hospital-based addiction treatment and highlight the clinical and research innovations needed to elevate the standards of care for patients with SUDs in the intensive care unit (ICU) amidst staggering individual and public health consequences. RECENT FINDINGS Despite the rapid increase of SUDs in recent years, with growing implications for critical care, dedicated studies focused on ICU patients with SUDs remain scant. Available data demonstrate SUDs are major risk factors for the development and severity of critical illness and are associated with poor outcomes. ICU patients with SUDs experience mutually reinforcing effects of substance withdrawal and pain, which amplify risks and consequences of delirium, and complicate management of comorbid conditions. Hospital-based addiction treatment can dramatically improve the health outcomes of hospitalized patients with SUDs and should begin in the ICU. SUMMARY SUDs have a significant impact on critical illness and post-ICU outcomes. High-quality cohort and treatment studies designed specifically for ICU patients with SUDs are needed to define best practices and improve health outcomes in this vulnerable population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tessa L Steel
- Harborview Medical Center, Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine
| | - Elenore P Bhatraju
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Kelsey Hills-Dunlap
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Division of Pulmonary Sciences & Critical Care, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Edelman EJ, Rojas-Perez OF, Nich C, Corvino J, Frankforter T, Gordon D, Jordan A, Paris M, Weimer MB, Yates BT, Williams EC, Kiluk BD. Promoting alcohol treatment engagement post-hospitalization with brief intervention, medications and CBT4CBT: protocol for a randomized clinical trial in a diverse patient population. Addict Sci Clin Pract 2023; 18:55. [PMID: 37726823 PMCID: PMC10510167 DOI: 10.1186/s13722-023-00407-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2023] [Accepted: 08/15/2023] [Indexed: 09/21/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Alcohol use disorder (AUD) commonly causes hospitalization, particularly for individuals disproportionately impacted by structural racism and other forms of marginalization. The optimal approach for engaging hospitalized patients with AUD in treatment post-hospital discharge is unknown. We describe the rationale, aims, and protocol for Project ENHANCE (ENhancing Hospital-initiated Alcohol TreatmeNt to InCrease Engagement), a clinical trial testing increasingly intensive approaches using a hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation approach. METHODS We are randomizing English and/or Spanish-speaking individuals with untreated AUD (n = 450) from a large, urban, academic hospital in New Haven, CT to: (1) Brief Negotiation Interview (with referral and telephone booster) alone (BNI), (2) BNI plus facilitated initiation of medications for alcohol use disorder (BNI + MAUD), or (3) BNI + MAUD + initiation of computer-based training for cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT4CBT, BNI + MAUD + CBT4CBT). Interventions are delivered by Health Promotion Advocates. The primary outcome is AUD treatment engagement 34 days post-hospital discharge. Secondary outcomes include AUD treatment engagement 90 days post-discharge and changes in self-reported alcohol use and phosphatidylethanol. Exploratory outcomes include health care utilization. We will explore whether the effectiveness of the interventions on AUD treatment engagement and alcohol use outcomes differ across and within racialized and ethnic groups, consistent with disproportionate impacts of AUD. Lastly, we will conduct an implementation-focused process evaluation, including individual-level collection and statistical comparisons between the three conditions of costs to providers and to patients, cost-effectiveness indices (effectiveness/cost ratios), and cost-benefit indices (benefit/cost ratios, net benefit [benefits minus costs). Graphs of individual- and group-level effectiveness x cost, and benefits x costs, will portray relationships between costs and effectiveness and between costs and benefits for the three conditions, in a manner that community representatives also should be able to understand and use. CONCLUSIONS Project ENHANCE is expected to generate novel findings to inform future hospital-based efforts to promote AUD treatment engagement among diverse patient populations, including those most impacted by AUD. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT05338151.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Jennifer Edelman
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, 367 Cedar Street, ES Harkness Memorial Hall, Suite 401, New Haven, CT, 06510, USA.
- Yale Program in Addiction Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
| | | | - Charla Nich
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Joanne Corvino
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Tami Frankforter
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Derrick Gordon
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
- The Consultation Center, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Ayana Jordan
- Department of Psychiatry, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Manuel Paris
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
- Hispanic Clinic, Connecticut Mental Health Center, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Melissa B Weimer
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, 367 Cedar Street, ES Harkness Memorial Hall, Suite 401, New Haven, CT, 06510, USA
- Yale Program in Addiction Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
- Department of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Brian T Yates
- Department of Psychology, American University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Emily C Williams
- Department of Health Systems and Population Health, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, WA, USA
- Health Services Research and Development Seattle-Denver Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Veterans Health Administration (VA), Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Brian D Kiluk
- Yale Program in Addiction Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Mayo-Smith MF, Lawrence D. Treatment of Alcohol Use Disorder in Hospitalized Patients: Some Sobering Findings. Ann Intern Med 2023; 176:1129-1130. [PMID: 37364269 DOI: 10.7326/m23-1419] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/28/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Michael F Mayo-Smith
- Department of Medicine, White River Junction VA Medical Center, White River Junction, Vermont, and Dartmouth Geisel School of Medicine, Hanover, New Hampshire
| | - David Lawrence
- Substance Use Disorders Program, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, and Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Muller M, Weyer G, Zakrison T, Ari M. Impact of an opioid use disorder consult service on hospitalized trauma patients with opioid use disorder. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2023; 95:226-233. [PMID: 36914601 DOI: 10.1097/ta.0000000000003965] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Opioid use disorder (OUD) is common in the hospitalized trauma population, being a comorbid diagnosis in approximately 1% of operative trauma cases. The impact of an addiction consult service in this population has been less well studied but may lead to increased provision of evidence-based OUD treatment and improved postdischarge outcomes. METHODS One hundred thirteen patients with an International Classification of Diseases diagnosis of OUD who were admitted to the trauma service at a single academic hospital between January 2020 to December 2021 were included in a retrospective chart review. Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used to evaluate differences between patients who received an OUD consult and those who did not. Regression analysis was used to assess differences in postdischarge acute care utilization, attendance of follow-up appointments, initiation of and discharge on medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD), naloxone prescribing at discharge, and length of stay (LOS) between the consult and no-consult groups. RESULTS Eighty-one patients in the study population received a consult and 32 did not. Patients in the consult group were more likely to have started MOUD during their admission (odds ratio [OR], 2.09; p < 0.001), be discharged with naloxone (OR, 1.89; p < 0.001), have a plan in place for continued OUD treatment at discharge (OR, 1.43; p < 0.001), and attend scheduled follow-up appointments with the trauma team (OR, 1.76; p = 0.02). Differences in acute care utilization and LOS between the two groups were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION An OUD consult service can provide benefit to hospitalized trauma patients by increasing likelihood of starting MOUD, of discharging with MOUD and naloxone, and of attending trauma follow-up appointments without increasing LOS or acute care utilization. Thus, addiction consult service interventions during hospital admissions for trauma may serve to facilitate both evidence-based OUD care and posthospitalization trauma care. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic/Care Management; Level IV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan Muller
- From the Pritzker School of Medicine (M.M.), Department of Medicine (G.W., M.A.), and Department of Surgery (T.Z.), The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Sokolski E, Skogrand E, Goff A, Englander H. Rapid Low-dose Buprenorphine Initiation for Hospitalized Patients With Opioid Use Disorder. J Addict Med 2023; 17:e278-e280. [PMID: 37579112 DOI: 10.1097/adm.0000000000001133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Low-dose buprenorphine initiation allows patients to start buprenorphine for treatment of opioid use disorder (OUD) while continuing full-agonist opioids. This strategy is beneficial for hospitalized patients who may have acute pain and are not able to tolerate withdrawal. However, most protocols require 7-10 to complete, which may create barriers in patients with shorter or unpredictable lengths of stay. OBJECTIVE This cohort study examined the efficacy and feasibility of a rapid low-dose buprenorphine initiation protocol in the hospital setting. METHODS We performed a retrospective cohort study of hospitalized patients with OUD (diagnosed by DSM-5 criteria) seen by an addiction medicine consult service at a single academic medical center who started buprenorphine via a rapid low-dose initiation between November 2021 and May 2022. Patients were prospectively tracked using an electronic registry, and data were abstracted from the electronic health record. RESULTS Twenty-four patients underwent rapid low-dose initiation during the study period. All patients received full-agonist opioids before starting buprenorphine. Thirteen (54%) patients reported using fentanyl, with 5 patients reported endorsing use within 48 hours preceding buprenorphine initiation. Nineteen (79%) patients completed initiation with an average time to completion of 72 hours. Among patients who reported fentanyl use in the 48 hours before starting buprenorphine, 60% completed initiation and 40% elected to transition to methadone. No patients experienced precipitated withdrawal. CONCLUSIONS Rapid low-dose buprenorphine initiation provides a feasible and well-tolerated alternative to traditional and slower low-dose initiations for hospitalized patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eleasa Sokolski
- From the Section of Addiction Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR (E Sokolski, AG, HE); Department of Pharmacy Services, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR (E Skogrand); and Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, Section of Addiction Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR (HE)
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Tsui JI, Stephens D, Collins B, Denisiuk E, Hallgren KA, Blalock KL, Klein JW, Jack HE, Merrill JO. Co-use of Methamphetamine Is Associated With Lower Rates of Linkage to Outpatient Treatment for Hospitalized Patients Who Initiate Buprenorphine. J Addict Med 2023; 17:491-492. [PMID: 37579119 PMCID: PMC10350466 DOI: 10.1097/adm.0000000000001129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Judith I. Tsui
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
| | | | - Brett Collins
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
| | - Eric Denisiuk
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
| | - Kevin A. Hallgren
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
| | - Kendra L. Blalock
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
| | - Jared W. Klein
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
| | - Helen E. Jack
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
| | - Joseph O. Merrill
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Englander H. Reply to: "Co-use of Methamphetamine Is Associated With Lower Rates of Linkage to Outpatient Treatment for Hospitalized Patients Who Initiate Buprenorphine". J Addict Med 2023; 17:492-493. [PMID: 37579120 DOI: 10.1097/adm.0000000000001130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Honora Englander
- Section of Addiction Medicine in Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR; and Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Leary T, Aubin N, Marsh DC, Roach M, Nikodem P, Caswell JM, Irwin B, Pillsworth E, Mclelland M, Long B, Bhagavatula S, Eibl JK, Morin KA. Building an inpatient addiction medicine consult service in Sudbury, Canada: preliminary data and lessons learned in the era of COVID-19. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy 2023; 18:29. [PMID: 37217953 DOI: 10.1186/s13011-023-00537-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2023] [Accepted: 05/05/2023] [Indexed: 05/24/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The goal of this study was to (1) Describe the patient population of a newly implemented addiction medicine consult service (AMCS); (2) Evaluate referrals to community-based addiction support services and acute health service use, over time; (3) Provide lessons learned. METHODS A retrospective observational analysis was conducted at Health Sciences North in Sudbury, Ontario, Canada, with a newly implemented AMCS from November 2018 and July 2021. Data were collected using the hospital's electronic medical records. The outcomes measured included the number of emergency department visits, inpatient admissions, and re-visits over time. An interrupted time-series analysis was performed to measure the effect of AMCS implementation on acute health service use at Health Sciences North. RESULTS A total of 833 unique patients were assessed through the AMCS. A total of 1,294 referrals were made to community-based addiction support services, with the highest proportion of referrals between August and October 2020. The post-intervention trend for ED visits, ED re-visits, ED length of stay, inpatient visits, re-visits, and inpatient length of stay did not significantly differ from the pre-intervention period. CONCLUSION Implementation of an AMCS provides a focused service for patients using with substance use disorders. The service resulted in a high referral rate to community-based addiction support services and limited changes in health service usage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tara Leary
- Health Science North, Sudbury, Canada
- Northern Ontario School of Medicine, 936 Ramsey Lake Road, Sudbury, ON, P3E 2C6, Canada
| | | | - David C Marsh
- ICES North, Sudbury, Canada
- Health Sciences North Research Institute, Sudbury, Canada
- Northern Ontario School of Medicine, 936 Ramsey Lake Road, Sudbury, ON, P3E 2C6, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Brad Long
- Health Science North, Sudbury, Canada
- Northern Ontario School of Medicine, 936 Ramsey Lake Road, Sudbury, ON, P3E 2C6, Canada
| | - Sastry Bhagavatula
- Health Science North, Sudbury, Canada
- Northern Ontario School of Medicine, 936 Ramsey Lake Road, Sudbury, ON, P3E 2C6, Canada
| | - Joseph K Eibl
- Health Sciences North Research Institute, Sudbury, Canada
- Northern Ontario School of Medicine, 936 Ramsey Lake Road, Sudbury, ON, P3E 2C6, Canada
| | - Kristen A Morin
- Health Science North, Sudbury, Canada.
- ICES North, Sudbury, Canada.
- Health Sciences North Research Institute, Sudbury, Canada.
- Northern Ontario School of Medicine, 936 Ramsey Lake Road, Sudbury, ON, P3E 2C6, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Cook RR, Foot C, Arah OA, Humphreys K, Rudolph KE, Luo SX, Tsui JI, Levander XA, Korthuis PT. Estimating the impact of stimulant use on initiation of buprenorphine and extended-release naltrexone in two clinical trials and real-world populations. Addict Sci Clin Pract 2023; 18:11. [PMID: 36788634 PMCID: PMC9930351 DOI: 10.1186/s13722-023-00364-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2022] [Accepted: 02/01/2023] [Indexed: 02/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Co-use of stimulants and opioids is rapidly increasing. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) have established the efficacy of medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD), but stimulant use may decrease the likelihood of initiating MOUD treatment. Furthermore, trial participants may not represent "real-world" populations who would benefit from treatment. METHODS We conducted a two-stage analysis. First, associations between stimulant use (time-varying urine drug screens for cocaine, methamphetamine, or amphetamines) and initiation of buprenorphine or extended-release naltrexone (XR-NTX) were estimated across two RCTs (CTN-0051 X:BOT and CTN-0067 CHOICES) using adjusted Cox regression models. Second, results were generalized to three target populations who would benefit from MOUD: Housed adults identifying the need for OUD treatment, as characterized by the National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH); adults entering OUD treatment, as characterized by Treatment Episodes Dataset (TEDS); and adults living in rural regions of the U.S. with high rates of injection drug use, as characterized by the Rural Opioids Initiative (ROI). Generalizability analyses adjusted for differences in demographic characteristics, substance use, housing status, and depression between RCT and target populations using inverse probability of selection weighting. RESULTS Analyses included 673 clinical trial participants, 139 NSDUH respondents (weighted to represent 661,650 people), 71,751 TEDS treatment episodes, and 1,933 ROI participants. The majority were aged 30-49 years, male, and non-Hispanic White. In RCTs, stimulant use reduced the likelihood of MOUD initiation by 32% (adjusted HR [aHR] = 0.68, 95% CI 0.49-0.94, p = 0.019). Stimulant use associations were slightly attenuated and non-significant among housed adults needing treatment (25% reduction, aHR = 0.75, 0.48-1.18, p = 0.215) and adults entering OUD treatment (28% reduction, aHR = 0.72, 0.51-1.01, p = 0.061). The association was more pronounced, but still non-significant among rural people injecting drugs (39% reduction, aHR = 0.61, 0.35-1.06, p = 0.081). Stimulant use had a larger negative impact on XR-NTX initiation compared to buprenorphine, especially in the rural population (76% reduction, aHR = 0.24, 0.08-0.69, p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS Stimulant use is a barrier to buprenorphine or XR-NTX initiation in clinical trials and real-world populations that would benefit from OUD treatment. Interventions to address stimulant use among patients with OUD are urgently needed, especially among rural people injecting drugs, who already suffer from limited access to MOUD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R R Cook
- Section of Addiction Medicine, Department of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Sam Jackson Hall, Suite 3370, 3245 SW Pavilion Loop, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.
| | - C Foot
- Section of Addiction Medicine, Department of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Sam Jackson Hall, Suite 3370, 3245 SW Pavilion Loop, Portland, OR, 97239, USA
| | - O A Arah
- Department of Epidemiology, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Division of Physical Sciences, Department of Statistics, UCLA College, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Research Unit for Epidemiology, Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - K Humphreys
- Center for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - K E Rudolph
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - S X Luo
- Division on Substance Use Disorders, Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, USA
| | - J I Tsui
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - X A Levander
- Section of Addiction Medicine, Department of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Sam Jackson Hall, Suite 3370, 3245 SW Pavilion Loop, Portland, OR, 97239, USA
| | - P T Korthuis
- Section of Addiction Medicine, Department of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Sam Jackson Hall, Suite 3370, 3245 SW Pavilion Loop, Portland, OR, 97239, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Addiction Services for Veterans: Opportunities in Acute Care. J Addict Med 2023; 17:42-46. [PMID: 35914119 DOI: 10.1097/adm.0000000000001026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to estimate the proportion of total hospital discharges that involved a primary or secondary substance-related diagnosis code (SubDx) on inpatient medicine, psychiatry, and surgery services as part of a needs assessment for inpatient addiction consultation at our large, academic-affiliated Veterans Affairs (VA) hospital. METHODS We first calculated the percentage of total and service-specific discharges with a primary or secondary substance-related International Classification of Disease, Tenth Revision , code on all inpatient services (medicine, psychiatry, and surgery) in Fiscal Year 2017, 2018, and 2019, using facility-level data. Second, we calculated the proportion of total discharges that involved alcohol- and opioid-related diagnoses. RESULTS Over the 3 years studied, 29% of total discharges had a SubDx (4469 of 15,575). The proportion of total discharges that involved a SubDx was 23% (1246 of 5449) in 2017, 31% (1664 of 5332) in 2018, and 33% in 2019 (1559 of 4794), a statistically significant increase ( P < 0.001). As a percentage of service-specific discharges, 65% of discharges from psychiatry (1446 of 2217) had a SubDx, compared with 25% from medicine (2469 of 9713), and 15% from surgery (554 of 3645). Medicine services had the most discharges with SubDx, with a year-over-year increase in the number of discharges with SubDx. The percentage of total discharges that involved alcohol- and opioid-related diagnoses was 14% and 4%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Substance-related diagnoses are prevalent at our hospital and are increasing over time. The largest number of discharges with SubDx was found on medicine services. Alcohol-related diagnoses were nearly 4 times more prevalent than opioid-related diagnoses. We found focused need around alcohol use and alcohol withdrawal.
Collapse
|
20
|
King CA, Cook R, Korthuis PT, McCarty D, Morris CD, Englander H. Expanding Inpatient Addiction Consult Services Through Accountable Care Organizations for Medicaid Enrollees: A Modeling Study. J Addict Med 2022; 16:570-576. [PMID: 35135988 PMCID: PMC9357852 DOI: 10.1097/adm.0000000000000972] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Addiction consult services (ACS) care for hospitalized patients with substance use disorder, including opioid use disorder (OUD). Medicaid Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) could enhance access to ACS. This study extends data from Oregon's only ACS to Oregon's 15 regional Medicaid Coordinated Care Organizations (CCOs) to illustrate the potential value of enhanced in- and out-patient care for hospitalized patients with OUD. The study objectives were to estimate the effects of (1) expanding ACS care through CCOs in Oregon, and (2) increasing community treatment access within CCOs, on post-discharge OUD treatment engagement. METHODS We used a validated Markov model, populated with Oregon Medicaid data from April 2015 to December 2017, to estimate study objectives. RESULTS Oregon Medicaid patients hospitalized with OUD with care billed to a CCO (n = 5878) included 1298 (22.1%) patients engaged in post-discharge OUD treatment. Simulation of referral to an ACS increased post-discharge OUD treatment engagement to 47.0% (95% confidence interval [CI] 45.7%, 48.3%), or 2684 patients (95% CI 2610, 2758). Ten of fifteen (66.7%) CCOs had fewer than 20% of patients engage in post-discharge OUD care. Without ACS, increasing outpatient treatment such that 20% of patients engage increased the patients engaging in post-discharge OUD care from 12.9% or 296 patients in care at baseline to 20% (95% CI 18.1%, 21.4%) or 453 (95% CI 416, 491). DISCUSSION ACOs can improve care for patients hospitalized with OUD. Implementing ACS in ACO networks can potentially improve post-discharge OUD treatment engagement, but community treatment systems must be prepared to accept more patients as inpatient addiction care improves.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline A King
- From the Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR (CAK); Department of Medicine, Section of Addiction Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR (RC, PTK, HE); School of Public Health, Oregon Health & Science University - Portland State University, Portland, OR (DM); Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR (CDM); Department of Medicine, Division of Hospital Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR (HE)
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Englander H, Jones A, Krawczyk N, Patten A, Roberts T, Korthuis PT, McNeely J. A Taxonomy of Hospital-Based Addiction Care Models: a Scoping Review and Key Informant Interviews. J Gen Intern Med 2022; 37:2821-2833. [PMID: 35534663 PMCID: PMC9411356 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-022-07618-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2022] [Accepted: 04/12/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is pressing need to improve hospital-based addiction care. Various models for integrating substance use disorder care into hospital settings exist, but there is no framework for describing, selecting, or comparing models. We sought to fill that gap by constructing a taxonomy of hospital-based addiction care models based on scoping literature review and key informant interviews. METHODS Methods included a scoping review of the literature on US hospital-based addiction care models and interventions for adults, published between January 2000 and July 2021. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 15 key informants experienced in leading, implementing, evaluating, andpracticing hospital-based addiction care to explore model characteristics, including their perceived strengths, limitations, and implementation considerations. We synthesized findings from the literature review and interviews to construct a taxonomy of model types. RESULTS Searches identified 2,849 unique abstracts. Of these, we reviewed 280 full text articles, of which 76 were included in the final review. We added 8 references from reference lists and informant interviews, and 4 gray literature sources. We identified six distinct hospital-based addiction care models. Those classified as addiction consult models include (1) interprofessional addiction consult services, (2) psychiatry consult liaison services, and (3) individual consultant models. Those classified as practice-based models, wherein general hospital staff integrate addiction care into usual practice, include (4) hospital-based opioid treatment and (5) hospital-based alcohol treatment. The final type was (6) community-based in-reach, wherein community providers deliver care. Models vary in their target patient population, staffing, and core clinical and systems change activities. Limitations include that some models have overlapping characteristics and variable ways of delivering core components. DISCUSSION A taxonomy provides hospital clinicians and administrators, researchers, and policy-makers with a framework to describe, compare, and select models for implementing hospital-based addiction care and measure outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Honora Englander
- Section of Addiction Medicine in Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
- Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
| | - Amy Jones
- School of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Noa Krawczyk
- Department of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Alisa Patten
- Section of Addiction Medicine in Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Timothy Roberts
- NYU Health Sciences Library, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - P Todd Korthuis
- Section of Addiction Medicine in Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Jennifer McNeely
- Department of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Chockalingam L, Burnham EL, Jolley SE. Medication prescribing for alcohol use disorders during alcohol-related encounters in a Colorado regional healthcare system. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2022; 46:1094-1102. [PMID: 35723682 DOI: 10.1111/acer.14837] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2021] [Accepted: 04/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
RATIONALE Investigations show that medications for alcohol use disorders (MAUD) reduce heavy drinking and relapses. However, only 1.6% of individuals with alcohol use disorders (AUD) receive MAUD across care settings. The epidemiology of MAUD prescribing in the acute care setting is incompletely described. We hypothesized that MAUD would be under prescribed in inpatient acute care hospital settings compared to the outpatient, emergency department (ED), and inpatient substance use treatment settings. METHODS We evaluated electronic health record (EHR) data from adult patients with an International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision (ICD-10) alcohol-related diagnosis in the University of Colorado Health (UCHealth) system between January 1, 2016 and 31 December, 2019. Data from patients with an ICD-10 diagnosis code for opioid use disorder and those receiving MAUD prior to their first alcohol-related episode were excluded. The primary outcome was prescribing of MAUD, defined by prescription of naltrexone, acamprosate, and/or disulfiram. We performed bivariate and multivariate analyses to identify independent predictors of MAUD prescribing at UCHealth. RESULTS We identified 48,421 unique patients with 136,205 alcohol-related encounters at UCHealth. Encounters occurred in the ED (42%), inpatient acute care (17%), inpatient substance use treatment (18%), or outpatient primary care (12%) settings. Only 2270 (5%) patients received MAUD across all settings. Female sex and addiction medicine consults positively predicted MAUD prescribing. In contrast, encounters outside inpatient substance use treatment, Hispanic ethnicity, and black or non-white race were negative predictors of MAUD prescribing. Compared to inpatient substance use treatment, inpatient acute care hospitalizations for AUD was associated with a 93% reduced odds of receiving MAUD. CONCLUSIONS AUD-related ED and inpatient acute care hospital encounters in our healthcare system were common. Nevertheless, prescriptions for MAUD were infrequent in this population, particularly in inpatient settings. Our findings suggest that the initiation of MAUD for patients with alcohol-related diagnoses in acute care settings deserves additional evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ellen L Burnham
- Department of Medicine, Pulmonary Sciences and Critical Care Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Sarah E Jolley
- Department of Medicine, Pulmonary Sciences and Critical Care Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Nordeck CD, Welsh C, Schwartz RP, Mitchell SG, O'Grady KE, Gryczynski J. Opioid agonist treatment initiation and linkage for hospitalized patients seen by a substance use disorder consultation service. DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE REPORTS 2022; 2:100031. [PMID: 36845893 PMCID: PMC9948812 DOI: 10.1016/j.dadr.2022.100031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2021] [Revised: 02/02/2022] [Accepted: 02/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Background Facilitating opioid agonist treatment (OAT) for opioid use disorder (OUD) is an important role of hospital substance use disorder (SUD) consultation services. In the NavSTAR trial, hospital patients receiving SUD consultation who were randomly assigned to patient navigation services for 3 months post-discharge had fewer readmissions compared to usual care. Methods This secondary analysis examined hospital-based OAT initiation (pre-randomization) and community-based OAT linkage (post-discharge) among NavSTAR trial participants with OUD (N=314). Associations between OAT initiation and linkage, and patient demographics, housing status, comorbid SUD diagnoses, recent substance use, and study condition were examined using multinomial and dichotomous logistic regression. Results Overall, 57.6% initiated OAT during hospitalization (36.3% methadone, 21.3% buprenorphine). Compared to participants not initiating OAT, participants who received methadone were more likely to be female (Relative Risk Ratio [RRR]=2.05, 95% CI=1.11, 3.82, p=0.02), while participants who received buprenorphine were more likely to report homelessness (RRR=2.57, 95% CI=1.24, 5.32, p=0.01). Compared to participants initiating methadone, participants initiating buprenorphine were more likely to be non-White (RRR=3.89; 95% CI=1.55, 9.70; p=0.004) and to report prior buprenorphine treatment (RRR=2.57; 95% CI=1.27, 5.20; p=0.009). OAT linkage within 30-days post-discharge was associated with hospital-based buprenorphine initiation (Adjusted Odds Ratio [AOR]=3.86, 95% CI=1.73, 8.61, p=0.001) and patient navigation intervention (AOR=2.97, 95% CI=1.60, 5.52, p=0.001). Conclusions OAT initiation differed by sex, race, and housing status. Hospital-based OAT initiation and patient navigation were independently associated with linkage to community-based OAT. Hospitalization is a reachable moment to begin OAT to alleviate withdrawal and facilitate treatment continuity post-discharge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Courtney D. Nordeck
- Friends Research Institute, Inc., Baltimore, MD, United States
- Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Christopher Welsh
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | | | | | - Kevin E. O'Grady
- Department of Psychology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, United States
| | - Jan Gryczynski
- Friends Research Institute, Inc., Baltimore, MD, United States
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Button D, Hartley J, Robbins J, Levander XA, Smith NJ, Englander H. Low-dose Buprenorphine Initiation in Hospitalized Adults With Opioid Use Disorder: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis. J Addict Med 2022; 16:e105-e111. [PMID: 34001775 PMCID: PMC8595358 DOI: 10.1097/adm.0000000000000864] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Patients with opioid use disorder (OUD) can initiate buprenorphine without requiring a withdrawal period through a low-dose (sometimes referred to as "micro-induction") approach. Although there is growing interest in low-dose buprenorphine initiation, current evidence is limited to case reports and small case series. METHODS We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients with OUD seen by a hospital-based addiction medicine consult service who underwent low-dose buprenorphine initiation starting during hospital admission. We then integrated our practice-based experiences with results from the existing literature to create practice considerations. RESULTS Sixty-eight individuals underwent 72 low-dose buprenorphine initiations between July 2019 and July 2020. Reasons for low-dose versus standard buprenorphine initiation included co-occurring pain (91.7%), patient anxiety around the possibility of withdrawal (69.4%), history of precipitated withdrawal (9.7%), opioid withdrawal intolerance (6.9%), and other reason/not specified (18.1%). Of the 72 low-dose buprenorphine initiations, 50 (69.4%) were completed in the hospital, 9 (12.5%) transitioned to complete as an outpatient, and 13 (18.1%) were terminated early. We apply our experiences and findings from literature to recommendations for varied clinical scenarios, including acute illness, co-occurring pain, opioid withdrawal intolerance, transition from high dose methadone to buprenorphine, history of precipitated withdrawal, and rapid hospital discharge. We share a standard low-dose initiation protocol with potential modifications based on above scenarios. CONCLUSIONS Low-dose buprenorphine initiation offers a well-tolerated and versatile approach for hospitalized patients with OUD. We share lessons from our experiences and the literature, and provide practical considerations for providers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dana Button
- Division of General Internal Medicine & Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, Section of Addiction Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University
| | | | - Jonathan Robbins
- Division of General Internal Medicine & Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, Section of Addiction Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University
| | - Ximena A. Levander
- Division of General Internal Medicine & Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, Section of Addiction Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University
| | - Natashia J. Smith
- Division of General Internal Medicine & Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, Section of Addiction Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University
| | - Honora Englander
- Division of General Internal Medicine & Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, Section of Addiction Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University
- Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Adams JW, Savinkina A, Hudspeth JC, Gai MJ, Jawa R, Marks LR, Linas BP, Hill A, Flood J, Kimmel S, Barocas JA. Simulated Cost-effectiveness and Long-term Clinical Outcomes of Addiction Care and Antibiotic Therapy Strategies for Patients With Injection Drug Use-Associated Infective Endocarditis. JAMA Netw Open 2022; 5:e220541. [PMID: 35226078 PMCID: PMC8886538 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.0541] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2021] [Accepted: 01/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Emerging evidence supports the use of outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) and, in many cases, partial oral antibiotic therapy for the treatment of injection drug use-associated infective endocarditis (IDU-IE); however, long-term outcomes and cost-effectiveness remain unknown. OBJECTIVE To compare the added value of inpatient addiction care services and the cost-effectiveness and clinical outcomes of alternative antibiotic treatment strategies for patients with IDU-IE. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This decision analytical modeling study used a validated microsimulation model to compare antibiotic treatment strategies for patients with IDU-IE. Model inputs were derived from clinical trials and observational cohort studies. The model included all patients with injection opioid drug use (N = 5 million) in the US who were eligible to receive OPAT either in the home or at a postacute care facility. Costs were annually discounted at 3%. Cost-effectiveness was evaluated from a health care sector perspective over a lifetime starting in 2020. Probabilistic sensitivity, scenario, and threshold analyses were performed to address uncertainty. INTERVENTIONS The model simulated 4 treatment strategies: (1) 4 to 6 weeks of inpatient intravenous (IV) antibiotic therapy along with opioid detoxification (usual care strategy), (2) 4 to 6 weeks of inpatient IV antibiotic therapy along with inpatient addiction care services that offered medication for opioid use disorder (usual care/addiction care strategy), (3) 3 weeks of inpatient IV antibiotic therapy along with addiction care services followed by OPAT (OPAT strategy), and (4) 3 weeks of inpatient IV antibiotic therapy along with addiction care services followed by partial oral antibiotic therapy (partial oral antibiotic strategy). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Mean percentage of patients completing treatment for IDU-IE, deaths associated with IDU-IE, life expectancy (measured in life-years [LYs]), mean cost per person, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). RESULTS All modeled scenarios were initialized with 5 million individuals (mean age, 42 years; range, 18-64 years; 70% male) who had a history of injection opioid drug use. The usual care strategy resulted in 18.63 LYs at a cost of $416 570 per person, with 77.6% of hospitalized patients completing treatment. Life expectancy was extended by each alternative strategy. The partial oral antibiotic strategy yielded the highest treatment completion rate (80.3%) compared with the OPAT strategy (78.8%) and the usual care/addiction care strategy (77.6%). The OPAT strategy was the least expensive at $412 150 per person. Compared with the OPAT strategy, the partial oral antibiotic strategy had an ICER of $163 370 per LY. Increasing IDU-IE treatment uptake and decreasing treatment discontinuation made the partial oral antibiotic strategy more cost-effective compared with the OPAT strategy. When assuming that all patients with IDU-IE were eligible to receive partial oral antibiotic therapy, the strategy was cost-saving and resulted in 0.0247 additional discounted LYs. When treatment discontinuation was decreased from 3.30% to 2.65% per week, the partial oral antibiotic strategy was cost-effective compared with OPAT at the $100 000 per LY threshold. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this decision analytical modeling study, incorporation of OPAT or partial oral antibiotic approaches along with addiction care services for the treatment of patients with IDU-IE was associated with increases in the number of people completing treatment, decreases in mortality, and savings in cost compared with the usual care strategy of providing inpatient IV antibiotic therapy alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joëlla W. Adams
- Section of Infectious Diseases, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
| | - Alexandra Savinkina
- Section of Infectious Diseases, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - James C. Hudspeth
- Section of Infectious Diseases, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Mam Jarra Gai
- Section of Infectious Diseases, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Raagini Jawa
- Section of Infectious Diseases, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Laura R. Marks
- Division of Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Benjamin P. Linas
- Section of Infectious Diseases, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Alison Hill
- Population Health Analytics Division, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jason Flood
- Population Health Analytics Division, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Simeon Kimmel
- Section of Infectious Diseases, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
- Section of General Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Joshua A. Barocas
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, University of Colorado, Aurora
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Anschutz Medical Campus, University of Colorado, Aurora
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
King C, Collins D, Patten A, Nicolaidis C, Englander H. Trust in Hospital Physicians Among Patients With Substance Use Disorder Referred to an Addiction Consult Service: A Mixed-methods Study. J Addict Med 2022; 16:41-48. [PMID: 33577229 PMCID: PMC8349928 DOI: 10.1097/adm.0000000000000819] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Trust is essential in patient-physician relationships. Hospitalized patients with substance use disorders (SUDs) often experience stigma and trauma in the hospital, which can impede trust. Little research has explored the role of hospital-based addictions care in creating trusting relationships with patients with SUDs. This study describes how trust in physicians changed among hospitalized people with SUDs who were seen by an interprofessional addiction medicine service. METHODS We analyzed data from hospitalized patients with SUD seen by an addiction consult service from 2015 to 2018. Participants completed surveys at baseline and 30 to 90 days after hospital discharge. Follow-up assessments included open-ended questions exploring participant experiences with hospitalization and the addiction consult service. We measured provider trust using the Wake Forest Trust scale. We modeled trust trajectories using discrete mixture modeling, and sampled qualitative interviews from those trust trajectories. RESULTS Of 328 participants with SUD who had prior hospitalizations but had not previously been seen by an addiction consult service, 196 (59.8%) had both baseline and follow-up trust scores. We identified 3 groups of patients: Persistent-Low Trust, Increasing Trust, and Persistent-High Trust and 4 qualitative themes around in-hospital trust: humanizing care, demonstrating addiction expertise, reliability, and granting agency. CONCLUSIONS Most participants retained or increased to high trust levels after hospitalization with an addiction consult service. Addiction consult services can create environments where healthcare providers build trust with, and humanize care for, hospitalized patients with SUD, and can also mitigate power struggles that hospitalized patients with SUD frequently experience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline King
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR
- MD/PhD Program, School of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR
| | | | - Alisa Patten
- Department of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University
| | - Christina Nicolaidis
- Department of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University
- School of Social Work, Portland State University
| | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Priest KC, King CA, Englander H, Lovejoy TI, McCarty D. Differences in the delivery of medications for opioid use disorder during hospitalization by racial categories: A retrospective cohort analysis. Subst Abus 2022; 43:1251-1259. [PMID: 35670778 PMCID: PMC10292919 DOI: 10.1080/08897077.2022.2074601] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Background: As the drug-related overdose crisis and COVID-19 pandemic continue, communities need increased access to medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) (i.e., buprenorphine and methadone). Disparities in the type of MOUD prescribed or administered by racial and ethnic categories are well described in the outpatient clinical environment. It is unknown, however, if these disparities persist when MOUD is provided in acute care hospitals. Methods: This study assessed differences in the delivery of buprenorphine versus methadone during acute medical or surgical hospitalizations for veterans with opioid use disorder (OUD) by racial categories (Black Non-Hispanic or Latino vs. White Non-Hispanic or Latino). Data were obtained retrospectively from the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) for federal fiscal year 2017. We built logistic regression models, adjusted for individual and hospital-related covariates, and calculated the predicted probabilities of MOUD delivery by racial categories. Results: The study cohort (n = 1,313 unique patients; N = 107 VHA hospitals) had a mean age of 57 (range 23 to 87 years), was predominantly male (96%), and composed entirely of Black (29%) or White (71%) patients. White patients were 11% more likely than Black patients to receive buprenorphine than methadone during hospitalization (p = 0.010; 95% CI: 2.7%, 20.0%). Among patients on MOUD prior to hospitalization, White patients were 21% more likely than Black patients to receive buprenorphine (p = 0.000; 95% CI: 9.8%, 31.5%). Among patients newly initiated on MOUD during hospitalization, there were no differences by racial categories. Conclusion: We observed disparities in the delivery of buprenorphine versus methadone during hospitalization by racial categories. The observed differences in hospital-based MOUD delivery may be influenced by MOUD received prior to hospitalization within the racialized outpatient addiction treatment system. The VHA and health systems more broadly must address all aspects of racism that contribute to inequitable MOUD access throughout all clinical contexts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelsey C. Priest
- MD/PhD Program, School of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, U.S.A
- Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, U.S.A
| | - Caroline A. King
- MD/PhD Program, School of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, U.S.A
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, U.S.A
| | - Honora Englander
- Division of Hospital Medicine & Section of Addiction Medicine, Department of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, U.S.A
| | - Travis I. Lovejoy
- Department of Psychiatry, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, U.S.A
- Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, Oregon, U.S.A
- School of Public Health, Oregon Health & Science University-Portland State University, Portland, Oregon, U.S.A
| | - Dennis McCarty
- School of Public Health, Oregon Health & Science University-Portland State University, Portland, Oregon, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Mitchell SG, Nordeck CD, Lertch E, Ross TE, Welsh C, Schwartz RP, Gryczynski J. Patients with substance use disorders receiving continued care in skilled nursing facilities following hospitalization. Subst Abus 2022; 43:848-854. [PMID: 35179452 PMCID: PMC9793431 DOI: 10.1080/08897077.2021.2007512] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
Background: As hospitals in the US face pressures to reduce lengths of stay, healthcare systems are increasingly utilizing skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) to continue treating patients stable enough to leave the hospital, but not to return home. Substance use disorder (SUD) can complicate care of patients transferred to SNFs. The objective of this paper is to understand SNF experiences for this population of patients with comorbid SUD transferred to SNFs and examine care experiences in these facilities. Methods: This secondary mixed-methods analysis focuses on SNF experiences from a clinical trial of patient navigation services for medically-hospitalized adults with comorbid opioid, cocaine, and/or alcohol use disorder. This study compared baseline assessments and medical record review for participants (N = 400) with vs. without SNF transfer, and analyzed semi-structured qualitative interviews with a subsample of 15 participants purposively selected based on their transfer to a SNF. Results: Over 1 in 4 participants had a planned discharged to a SNF (26.8% sub-acute, 3.3% acute). Compared to participants with other types of discharge, participants discharged to a SNF had longer initial hospitalizations (4.9 vs. 11.8 days, p < 0.001), and were more likely to be White (38.6 vs. 50.8%; p = 0.02), female (38.9 vs. 52.5%; p = 0.01), have opioid use disorder (75.7 vs. 85.0%, p = 0.03), and be hospitalized for infection (43.6 vs. 58.3%; p = 0.007), and less likely to have worked prior to hospitalization (24.3 vs. 12.5%; p = 0.006). Qualitative narratives identified several themes from the SNF experience, including opioid analgesic dosing issues, challenges to the use of opioid agonist treatment of OUD, illicit opioid dealing/use, and limited access to addiction recovery support services during and following the SNF stay. Conclusions: SNFs are a common disposition for patients in need of subacute services following hospitalization but may be ill-equipped to properly manage patients in need of new or continuing SUD treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Courtney D. Nordeck
- Friends Research Institute, Inc., Baltimore, MD,Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD
| | | | | | - Christopher Welsh
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Levander XA, Vega TA, Seaman A, Korthuis PT, Englander H. Utilising an access to care integrated framework to explore the perceptions of hepatitis C treatment of hospital-based interventions among people who use drugs. THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DRUG POLICY 2021; 96:103356. [PMID: 34226111 PMCID: PMC8568624 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2021.103356] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2021] [Revised: 06/15/2021] [Accepted: 06/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gaps remain in the hepatitis C virus (HCV) care cascade for people who use drugs (PWUD). Acute medical or surgical illnesses requiring hospitalisation are an opportunity to address addiction, but how inpatient strategies could affect HCV care accessibility for PWUD remains unknown. We explored patient perspectives of hospital-based interventions using an integrated framework of access to HCV care. METHODS We conducted a qualitative study of hospitalised adults (n=27) with HCV and addiction admitted to an urban academic medical centre in the United States between June and November 2019. Individual interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and dual-coded. We analysed data with coding specific for hospital-based interventions including screening, conducting HCV-related laboratory work-up, starting treatment, connecting with peers, and coordinating outpatient care. We analysed coded data at the semantic level for emergent themes using a framework approach based off an integrated framework of access to HCV care. RESULTS The majority of participants primarily used opioids (78%), were white (85%) and men (67%). Participants frequently reported HCV screening during previous hospitalisation with rare inpatient connection to HCV-related services. Participants expressed willingness to discuss HCV treatment candidacy during hospitalisation; however, lack of inpatient conversations led to perception that "nothing could be done" during admission. Participants expressed interest in completing inpatient HCV work-up to "get the ball rollin'" - consolidating care would enhance outpatient service permeability by reducing barriers. Others resisted HCV care coordination, preferring to focus on "immediate" issues including health conditions and addiction treatment. Participants also expressed openness to engaging with peers about HCV, noting shared drug use experience as critical to a peer relationship when discussing HCV. CONCLUSION Hospitalised PWUD have varied priorities, necessitating adaptable interventions for addressing HCV. Hospitalisation can be an opportunity to address HCV access to care including identification of treatment eligibility, consolidation of care, and facilitation of HCV-related referrals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ximena A Levander
- Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Section of Addiction Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd., Portland, OR, 97239 United States.
| | - Taylor A Vega
- School of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR, 97239, United States
| | - Andrew Seaman
- Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Section of Addiction Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd., Portland, OR, 97239 United States; Central City Concern, 232 NW 6th Ave., Portland, OR, 97209, United States
| | - P Todd Korthuis
- Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Section of Addiction Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd., Portland, OR, 97239 United States
| | - Honora Englander
- Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Section of Addiction Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd., Portland, OR, 97239 United States; Department of Medicine, Division of Hospital Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd., Portland, OR, 97239 United States
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
King CA, Englander H, Korthuis PT, Barocas JA, McConnell KJ, Morris CD, Cook R. Designing and validating a Markov model for hospital-based addiction consult service impact on 12-month drug and non-drug related mortality. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0256793. [PMID: 34506517 PMCID: PMC8432751 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256793] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2020] [Accepted: 08/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Addiction consult services (ACS) engage hospitalized patients with opioid use disorder (OUD) in care and help meet their goals for substance use treatment. Little is known about how ACS affect mortality for patients with OUD. The objective of this study was to design and validate a model that estimates the impact of ACS care on 12-month mortality among hospitalized patients with OUD. METHODS We developed a Markov model of referral to an ACS, post-discharge engagement in SUD care, and 12-month drug-related and non-drug related mortality among hospitalized patients with OUD. We populated our model using Oregon Medicaid data and validated it using international modeling standards. RESULTS There were 6,654 patients with OUD hospitalized from April 2015 through December 2017. There were 114 (1.7%) drug-related deaths and 408 (6.1%) non-drug related deaths at 12 months. Bayesian logistic regression models estimated four percent (4%, 95% CI = 2%, 6%) of patients were referred to an ACS. Of those, 47% (95% CI = 37%, 57%) engaged in post-discharge OUD care, versus 20% not referred to an ACS (95% CI = 16%, 24%). The risk of drug-related death at 12 months among patients in post-discharge OUD care was 3% (95% CI = 0%, 7%) versus 6% not in care (95% CI = 2%, 10%). The risk of non-drug related death was 7% (95% CI = 1%, 13%) among patients in post-discharge OUD treatment, versus 9% not in care (95% CI = 5%, 13%). We validated our model by evaluating its predictive, external, internal, face and cross validity. DISCUSSION Our novel Markov model reflects trajectories of care and survival for patients hospitalized with OUD. This model can be used to evaluate the impact of other clinical and policy changes to improve patient survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline A. King
- Dept. of Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, United States of America
| | - Honora Englander
- Department of Medicine, Section of Addiction Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, United States of America
| | - P. Todd Korthuis
- Department of Medicine, Section of Addiction Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, United States of America
| | - Joshua A. Barocas
- Section of Infectious Diseases, Boston University School of Medicine and Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - K. John McConnell
- Center for Health Systems Effectiveness, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, United States of America
| | - Cynthia D. Morris
- Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, United States of America
| | - Ryan Cook
- Department of Medicine, Section of Addiction Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Sikka MK, Gore S, Vega T, Strnad L, Gregg J, Englander H. "OPTIONS-DC", a feasible discharge planning conference to expand infection treatment options for people with substance use disorder. BMC Infect Dis 2021; 21:772. [PMID: 34372776 PMCID: PMC8351414 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-021-06514-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2021] [Accepted: 07/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Serious bacterial infections associated with substance use often result in long hospitalizations, premature discharges, and high costs. Out-of-hospital treatment options in people with substance use disorder (SUD) are often limited. Methods We describe a novel multidisciplinary and interprofessional care conference, “OPTIONS-DC,” to identify treatment options agreeable to both patients and providers using the frameworks of harm reduction and patient-centered care. We retrospectively reviewed charts of patients who had an OPTIONS-DC between February 2018 and July 2019 and used content analysis to understand the conferences’ effects on antibiotic treatment options. Results Fifty patients had an OPTIONS-DC during the study window. Forty-two (84%) had some intravenous (IV) substance use and 44 (88%) had an active substance use disorder. Participants’ primary substances included opioids (65%) or methamphetamines (28%). On average, conferences lasted 28 min. OPTIONS-DC providers recommended out-of-hospital antibiotic treatment options for 34 (68%) of patients. OPTIONS-DC recommended first line therapy of IV antibiotics for 35 (70%) patients, long-acting injectable antibiotics for 14 (28%), and oral therapy for 1 (2%). 35 (70%) patients that had an OPTIONS-DC completed an antibiotic course and 6 (12%) left the hospital prematurely. OPTIONS-DC expanded treatment options by exposing and contextualizing SUD, psychosocial risk and protective factors; incorporating patient preferences; and allowing providers to tailor antibiotic and SUD recommendations. Conclusions OPTIONS-DC is a feasible intervention that allows providers to integrate principles of harm reduction and offer patient-centered choices among patients needing prolonged antibiotic treatment. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12879-021-06514-9.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monica K Sikka
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, L457, Portland, OR, 97239-3098, USA.
| | - Sara Gore
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, L457, Portland, OR, 97239-3098, USA
| | - Taylor Vega
- School of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Luke Strnad
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, L457, Portland, OR, 97239-3098, USA.,Epidemiology Programs, School of Public Health, Oregon Health and Science University and Portland State University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Jessica Gregg
- Section of Addiction Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, BTE 119, Portland, OR, 97239-3098, USA.,Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Honora Englander
- Section of Addiction Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, BTE 119, Portland, OR, 97239-3098, USA. .,Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Vega TA, Levander XA, Seaman A, Korthuis PT, Englander H. "Sobriety equals getting rid of hepatitis C": A qualitative study exploring the interplay of substance use disorder and hepatitis C among hospitalized adults. J Subst Abuse Treat 2021; 127:108337. [PMID: 34134860 PMCID: PMC8217723 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsat.2021.108337] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2020] [Revised: 12/18/2020] [Accepted: 02/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND People who use drugs (PWUD) commonly experience complex illness, psychosocial stressors, housing insecurity, and stigma, which may play key roles in their struggles with addiction. In a study of hospitalized PWUD with hepatitis C virus infection (HCV), participants described treating HCV as "part of recovery." These findings led us to explore how hospitalization and acute illness altered patients' perceptions of substance use disorder (SUD) and HCV. METHODS Researchers audio recorded in-depth semi-structured individual interviews of 27 hospitalized adults with SUD and HCV seen by an addiction consult service (ACS) at an urban academic medical center between June and November 2019. Research staff transcribed interviews and dual coded them deductively and inductively at the semantic level. Researchers used a matrix visualization to discern relationships among codes and conducted a thematic analysis. RESULTS Many participants believed addictions treatment should precede an HCV cure for varying reasons. Some wanted to avoid reinfection; others believed "getting clean" afforded the mental clarity to address health issues, including HCV. Patients newly engaged in SUD treatment described HCV treatment as a "step towards recovery" and could serve as motivation to continue SUD treatment. Participants believed HCV cure could facilitate sobriety by "mentally putting drugs in the past" and was a future-oriented action toward "better health." Many participants described the compounded stigma of having HCV infection and SUD by multiple groups, including friends/family who do not use drugs, other drug users, and health care workers. CONCLUSION Hospitalized adults with SUD and HCV believed addictions engagement should precede HCV treatment and HCV cure could play an important role in their "recovery" journey. Discussing HCV treatment during hospitalization may be an opportunity to support engagement in SUD treatment and targets an untreated patient population critical for achieving HCV elimination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taylor A Vega
- School of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd., Portland, OR 97239, United States.
| | - Ximena A Levander
- Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Section of Addiction Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd., Portland, OR 97239, United States.
| | - Andrew Seaman
- Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Section of Addiction Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd., Portland, OR 97239, United States; Central City Concern, 232 NW6th Ave., Portland, OR 97209, United States.
| | - P Todd Korthuis
- Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Section of Addiction Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd., Portland, OR 97239, United States.
| | - Honora Englander
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hospital Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd., Portland, OR 97239, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Roy PJ, Price R, Choi S, Weinstein ZM, Bernstein E, Cunningham CO, Walley AY. Shorter outpatient wait-times for buprenorphine are associated with linkage to care post-hospital discharge. Drug Alcohol Depend 2021; 224:108703. [PMID: 33964730 PMCID: PMC8180499 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.108703] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2020] [Revised: 02/22/2021] [Accepted: 02/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Inpatient addiction consult services (ACS) lower barriers to accessing medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD), however not every patient recommended for MOUD links to outpatient care. We hypothesized that fewer days between discharge date and outpatient appointment date was associated with improved linkage to buprenorphine treatment among patients evaluated by an ACS. METHODS We extracted appointment and demographic data from electronic medical records and conducted retrospective chart review of adults diagnosed with opioid use disorder (OUD) evaluated by an ACS in Boston, MA between July 2015 and August 2017. These patients were initiated on or recommended buprenorphine treatment on discharge and provided follow-up appointment at our hospital post-discharge. Multivariable logistic regression assessed whether arrival to the appointment post-discharge was associated with shorter wait-times (0-1 vs. 2+ days). RESULTS In total, 142 patients were included. Among patients who had wait-times of 0-1 day, 63 % arrived to their appointment compared to wait-times of 2 or more days (42 %). There were no significant differences between groups based on age, gender, distance of residence from the hospital, insurance status, co-occurring alcohol use disorder diagnosis, or discharge with buprenorphine prescription. After adjusting for covariates, patients with 0-1 day of wait-time had 2.6 times the odds of arriving to their appointment [95 % CI 1.3-5.5] compared to patients who had 2+ days of wait-time. CONCLUSION For hospitalized patients with OUD evaluated for initiating MOUD, same- and next-day appointments are associated with increased odds of linkage to outpatient MOUD care post-discharge compared to waiting two or more days.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Payel J Roy
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 200 Lothrop St, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
| | - Ryan Price
- Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, 801 Massachusetts Ave, Boston, MA, 02118, USA
| | - Sugy Choi
- Department of Health Law, Policy, and Management, Boston University School of Public Health, 715 Albany St, Boston, MA, 02118, USA
| | - Zoe M Weinstein
- Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, 801 Massachusetts Ave, Boston, MA, 02118, USA
| | - Edward Bernstein
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Boston University School of Public Health, 715 Albany St, Boston, MA, 02118, USA; Department of Emergency Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, 850 Harrison Ave, Boston, MA, 02118, USA
| | - Chinazo O Cunningham
- Department of Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Avenue, Bronx, NY, 10461, USA
| | - Alexander Y Walley
- Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, 801 Massachusetts Ave, Boston, MA, 02118, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
McLaughlin MF, Li R, Carrero ND, Bain PA, Chatterjee A. Opioid use disorder treatment for people experiencing homelessness: A scoping review. Drug Alcohol Depend 2021; 224:108717. [PMID: 33985863 PMCID: PMC9758007 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.108717] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2021] [Revised: 03/11/2021] [Accepted: 03/14/2021] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The opioid-related overdose epidemic remains a persistent public health problem in the United States and has been accelerated by the 2019 coronavirus disease pandemic. Existing, evidence-based treatment options for opioid use disorder (OUD) are broadly underutilized, particularly by people experiencing homelessness (PEH). PEH are also more likely to misuse and overdose on opioids. To better understand current gaps and disparities in OUD treatment experienced by PEH and efforts to address them, we synthesized the literature reporting on the intersection of housing status and OUD treatment. METHODS We conducted a scoping review of the literature from the electronic databases MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, and Web of Science Core Collection. We included studies describing treatment-related outcomes specific to PEH and articles assessing OUD treatment interventions tailored to this population. Relevant findings were compiled via thematic analysis and narratively synthesized. RESULTS 60 articles met our inclusion criteria, including 43 descriptive and 17 intervention-focused studies. These studies demonstrated that PEH experience more barriers to OUD treatment than their housed counterparts and access inpatient and detoxification treatment more commonly than pharmacotherapy. However, the reviewed literature indicated that PEH have similar outcomes once engaged in pharmacotherapy. Efficacious interventions for PEH were low-barrier and targeted, with housing interventions also demonstrating benefit. CONCLUSIONS PEH have diminished access to evidence-based OUD treatment, particularly medications, and require targeted approaches to improve engagement and retention. To mitigate the disproportionate opioid-related morbidity and mortality PEH experience, innovative, flexible, and interdisciplinary OUD treatment models are necessary, with housing support playing an important role.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew F. McLaughlin
- Harvard College, Massachusetts Hall, Cambridge, MA, 02138, United States,Corresponding author. Present address at: San Francisco Department of Public Health, 25 Van Ness Ave. Suite 500, San Francisco, CA, 94102, United States
| | - Rick Li
- Harvard College, Massachusetts Hall, Cambridge, MA, 02138, United States
| | | | - Paul A. Bain
- Countway Library, Harvard Medical School, 10 Shattuck St., Boston, MA, 02115, United States
| | - Avik Chatterjee
- Boston Health Care for the Homeless Program, 780 Albany St., Boston, MA, 02118, United States,Boston University School of Medicine/Boston Medical Center, 72 E. Concord St., Boston, MA, 02118, United States
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Braithwaite V, Ti L, Fairbairn N, Ahamad K, McLean M, Harrison S, Wood E, Nolan S. Building a hospital-based addiction medicine consultation service in Vancouver, Canada: the path taken and lessons learned. Addiction 2021; 116:1892-1900. [PMID: 33339073 PMCID: PMC8862688 DOI: 10.1111/add.15383] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2019] [Revised: 01/22/2020] [Accepted: 12/09/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS To improve evidence-based addiction care in acute care settings, many hospitals across North America are developing an inpatient addiction medicine consultation service (AMCS). St Paul's Hospital in Vancouver, Canada houses a large interdisciplinary AMCS. This study aimed to: (1) describe the current model of clinical care and its evolution over time; (2) evaluate requests for an AMCS consultation over time; (3) highlight the established clinical training opportunities and educational curriculum and (4) provide some lessons learned. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS A retrospective observational analysis in an urban, academic hospital in Vancouver, Canada with a large interdisciplinary AMCS, studied from 2013 to 2018, among individuals who presented to hospital and had a substance use disorder. MEASUREMENTS Data were collected using the hospital's electronic medical records. The primary outcome was number of AMCS consultations over time. FINDINGS In 2014 the hospital's AMCS was restructured into an academic, interdisciplinary consultation service. A 228% increase in the number of consultations was observed between 2013 (1 year prior to restructuring) and 2018 (1373 versus 4507, respectively; P = 0.027). More than half of AMCS consultations originated from the emergency department, with this number increasing over time (55% in 2013 versus 74% in 2018). Referred patients were predominantly male (> 60% in all 5 years) between the ages of 45 and 65 years. Reasons for consultation remained consistent and included: opioids (33%), stimulants (30%), alcohol (23%) and cannabis use (8%). CONCLUSIONS After St Paul's Hospital in Vancouver, Canada was restructured in 2014 to a large, interdisciplinary addiction medicine consultation service (AMCS), the AMCS saw a 228% increase in the number of consultation requests with more than half of requests originating from the emergency department. Approximately two-thirds of consultation requests were for opioid or stimulant use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lianping Ti
- British Columbia Centre on Substance Use, Vancouver, BC, Canada,Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, St Paul’s Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Nadia Fairbairn
- British Columbia Centre on Substance Use, Vancouver, BC, Canada,Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, St Paul’s Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Keith Ahamad
- British Columbia Centre on Substance Use, Vancouver, BC, Canada,Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, St Paul’s Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Mark McLean
- British Columbia Centre on Substance Use, Vancouver, BC, Canada,Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, St Paul’s Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Scott Harrison
- British Columbia Centre on Substance Use, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Evan Wood
- British Columbia Centre on Substance Use, Vancouver, BC, Canada,Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, St Paul’s Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Seonaid Nolan
- British Columbia Centre on Substance Use, Vancouver, BC, Canada,Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, St Paul’s Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Coye AE, Jones MT, Bornstein KJ, Tookes HE, St Onge JE. A missed opportunity: underutilization of inpatient behavioral health services to reduce injection drug use sequelae in Florida. SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT PREVENTION AND POLICY 2021; 16:46. [PMID: 34059104 PMCID: PMC8167948 DOI: 10.1186/s13011-021-00383-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Background People who inject drugs (PWID) suffer high morbidity and mortality from injection related infections (IRI). The inpatient setting is an ideal opportunity to treat underlying substance use disorder (SUD), but it is unclear how often this occurs. Objectives To quantify the utilization of behavioral health services for PWID during inpatient admissions for IRI. Methods Data for all hospital admissions in Florida in FY2017 were obtained from the Agency for Healthcare Administration. Hospitalization for IRI were obtained using a validated ICD-10 algorithm and treatment for substance use disorder was quantified using ICD-10-Procedure Coding System (ICD-10-PCS) codes. Result Among the 20,001 IRI admissions, there were 230 patients who received behavioral health services as defined by ICD-10-PCS SAT codes for treatment for SUD. Conclusions In a state with a large number of IRI, only a very small portion of admissions received behavioral health services. Increased efforts should be directed to studying referral patterns among physicians and other providers caring for this population and increasing utilization of behavioral health services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Austin E Coye
- University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 1600 NW 10th Ave #1140, Miami, FL, 33136, USA.
| | - Mackenzie T Jones
- University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 1600 NW 10th Ave #1140, Miami, FL, 33136, USA
| | - Kasha J Bornstein
- University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 1600 NW 10th Ave #1140, Miami, FL, 33136, USA
| | - Hansel E Tookes
- Department Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, 33136, USA
| | - Joan E St Onge
- Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, 33136, USA
| |
Collapse
|