Addiction to Propofol: A Study of 22 Treatment Cases

NMDA receptor within nucleus accumbens shell regulates propofol self-administration through D1R/ERK/CREB signalling pathway

Addictive properties of propofol have been demonstrated in both humans and animals. The nucleus accumbens (NAc) shell (NAsh) in the brain, along with the interactions between N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) and the dopamine D1 receptor (D1R), as well as their downstream ERK/CREB signalling pathway in the NAc, are integral in regulating reward-seeking behaviour. Nevertheless, it remains unclear whether NMDARs and the NMDAR-D1R/ERK/CREB signalling pathway in the NAsh are involved in mediating propofol addiction. To investigate it, we conducted experiments with adult male Sprague-Dawley rats to establish a model of propofol self-administration behaviour. Subsequently, we microinjected D-AP5 (a competitive antagonist of NMDARs, 1.0-4.0 μg/0.3 μL/site) or vehicle into bilateral NAsh in rats that had previously self-administered propofol to examine the impact of NMDARs within the NAsh on propofol self-administration behaviour. Additionally, we examined the protein expressions of NR2A and NR2B subunits, and the D1R/ERK/CREB signalling pathways within the NAc. The results revealed that propofol administration behaviour was enhanced by D-AP5 pretreatment in NAsh, accompanied by elevated expressions of phosphorylation of NR2A (Tyr1246) and NR2B (Tyr1472) subunits. There were statistically significant increases in the expressions of D1Rs, as well as in the phosphorylated ERK1/2 (p-ERK1/2) and CREB (p-CREB). This evidence substantiates a pivotal role of NMDARs in the NAsh, with a particular emphasis on the NR2A and NR2B subunits, in mediating propofol self-administration behaviour. Furthermore, it suggests that this central reward processing mechanism may operate through the NMDAR-D1R/ERK/CREB signal transduction pathway.

Propofol misuse in medical professions: a scoping review

PURPOSE

We aimed to describe the current literature concerning propofol misuse in medical professionals, specifically relating to the individual demographics of those misusing propofol and the outcomes of propofol misuse.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective scoping review of the literature using a modified PRISMA approach. We used MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PsycINFO databases to identify relevant studies based on search terms. Studies describing individual medical professionals misusing propofol were included.

RESULTS

Twenty-four articles describing 88 individual cases of propofol misuse were included for data charting and analysis. Anesthesiologists and certified registered nurse anesthetists were most commonly identified. Death was a common method of identification of misuse, while rehabilitation and death were common final outcomes associated with propofol misuse.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite knowledge of the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of propofol by those misusing this medication, death was a common outcome reported in the literature. Data related to long-term outcomes including re-entry to clinical practice or success of rehabilitation were limited.

Substance use disorder in the anaesthetist: Guidelines from the Association of Anaesthetists: Guidelines from the Association of Anaesthetists

Anaesthetists have a higher incidence of substance use disorder when compared with other doctors. This might be due to the ease of access to intravenous opioids, propofol, midazolam, inhalational agents and other anaesthetic drugs. Alcohol use disorder continues to be the most common problem. Unfortunately, the first sign that something is amiss might be the anaesthetist's death from an accidental or deliberate overdose. While there are few accurate data, suicide is presumed to be the cause of death in approximately 6-10% of all anaesthetists. If we are to prevent this, substance use disorder must be recognised early, we should ensure the anaesthetist is supported by their department and hospital management and that the anaesthetist engages fully with treatment. Over 75% of anaesthetists return to full practice if they co-operate fully with the required treatment and supervision.

[Propofol: use, toxicology and assay features]

The study objective is to review the literature on the use, pharmacological properties, toxicology, and assay methods for intravenous anesthetic propofol. The scope and forms of propofol use, its pharmacokinetics, biotransformation features, which occurs more than 90% in the liver, and side effects associated with propofol use for anesthesia, are addressed. Propofol infusion syndrome (also known as PrIS) and deaths from propofol overdose due to medical errors, abuse, suicide attempts, and homicide are reported. Propofol identification and assay methods based on high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), gas chromatography with mass spectrometry (GC-MS), and liquid chromatography (LC) are described. The features of the methods performance are outlined; biological materials (the study objects) are listed: mainly blood and plasma, as well as urine, bile, hair, etc. The relevance of a comprehensive forensic chemical study of propofol is indicated, though there are few forensic studies of propofol.

Subanesthetic Dose of Propofol Activates the Reward System in Rats

BACKGROUND

Propofol has addictive properties, even with a single administration, and facilitates dopamine secretion in the nucleus accumbens (NAc). Activation of the dopaminergic circuits of the midbrain reward system, including the ventral tegmental area (VTA) and NAc, plays a crucial role in addiction. However, the effects of propofol on synaptic transmission and biochemical changes in the VTA-NAc circuit remain unclear.

METHODS

We investigated the effects of subanesthetic doses of propofol on rat VTA neurons and excitatory synaptic transmission in the NAc using slice patch-clamp experiments. Using immunohistochemistry and western blot analyses, we evaluated the effects of intraperitoneal propofol administration on the expression of addiction-associated transcription factor ΔFosB (truncated form of the FBJ murine osteosarcoma viral oncogene homolog B protein) in the NAcs in 5-week-old rats.

RESULTS

In the current-clamp mode, a subanesthetic dose (0.5-5 µmol/L) of propofol increased the action potential frequency in about half the VTA neurons (excited neurons: control: 9.4 ± 3.0 Hz, propofol 0.5 µmol/L: 21.5 ± 6.0 Hz, propofol 5 µmol/L: 14.6 ± 5.3 Hz, wash: 2.0 ± 0.7 Hz, n = 14/27 cells; unchanged/suppressed neurons: control: 1.68 ± 0.94 Hz, propofol 0.5 µmol/L: 1.0 ± 0.67 Hz, propofol 5 µmol/L: 0.89 ± 0.87 Hz, wash: 0.16 ± 0.11 Hz, n = 13/27 cells). In the voltage-clamp mode, about half the VTA principal neurons showed inward currents with 5 µmol/L of propofol (inward current neurons: control: -20.5 ± 10.0 pA, propofol 0.5 µmol/L: -62.6 ± 14.4 pA, propofol 5 µmol/L: -85.2 ± 18.3 pA, propofol 50 µmol/L: -17.1 ± 39.2 pA, washout: +30.5 ± 33.9 pA, n = 6/11 cells; outward current neurons: control: -33.9 ± 14.6 pA, propofol 0.5 µmol/L: -29.5 ± 16.0 pA, propofol 5 µmol/L: -0.5 ± 20.9 pA, propofol 50 µmol/L: +38.9 ± 18.5 pA, washout: +40.8 ± 32.1 pA, n = 5/11 cells). Moreover, 0.5 µmol/L propofol increased the amplitudes of evoked excitatory synaptic currents in the NAc, whereas >5 µmol/L propofol decreased them (control: 100.0 ± 2.0%, propofol 0.5 µmol/L: 118.4 ± 4.3%, propofol 5 µmol/L: 98.3 ± 3.3%, wash [within 10 min]: 70.7 ± 3.3%, wash [30 minutes later]: 89.9 ± 2.5%, n = 13 cells, P < .001, Dunnett's test comparing control and propofol 0.5 µmol/L). Intraperitoneally administered subanesthetic dose of propofol increased ΔFosB expression in the NAc, but not in VTA, 2 and 24 hours after administration, compared with the Intralipid control group (propofol 2 hours: 0.94 ± 0.15, 24 hours: 0.68 ± 0.07; Intralipid 2 hours: 0.40 ± 0.03, 24 hours: 0.37 ± 0.06, P = .0002 for drug in the 2-way analysis of variance).

CONCLUSIONS

Even a single administration of a subanesthetic dose of propofol may cause rewarding change in the central nervous system. Thus, there is a potential propofol rewarding effect among patients receiving anesthesia or sedation with propofol, as well as among health care providers exposed to propofol.

The Antagonism of Corticotropin-Releasing Factor Receptor-1 in Brain Suppress Stress-Induced Propofol Self-Administration in Rats

Propofol addiction has been detected in humans and rats, which may be facilitated by stress. Corticotropin-releasing factor acts through the corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) receptor-1 (CRF1R) and CRF2 receptor-2 (CRF2R) and is a crucial candidate target for the interaction between stress and drug abuse, but its role on propofol addiction remains unknown. Tail clip stressful stimulation was performed in rats to test the stress on the establishment of the propofol self-administration behavioral model. Thereafter, the rats were pretreated before the testing session at the bilateral lateral ventricle with one of the doses of antalarmin (CRF1R antagonist, 100–500 ng/site), antisauvagine 30 (CRF2R antagonist, 100–500 ng/site), and RU486 (glucocorticoid receptor antagonist, 100–500 ng/site) or vehicle. The dopamine D1 receptor (D1R) in the nucleus accumbens (NAc) was detected to explore the underlying molecular mechanism. The sucrose self-administration establishment and maintenance, and locomotor activities were also examined to determine the specificity. We found that the establishment of propofol self-administration was promoted in the tail clip treated group (the stress group), which was inhibited by antalarmin at the dose of 100–500 ng/site but was not by antisauvagine 30 or RU486. Accordingly, the expression of D1R in the NAc was attenuated by antalarmin, dose-dependently. Moreover, pretreatments fail to change sucrose self-administration behavior or locomotor activities. This study supports the role of CRF1R in the brain in mediating the central reward processing through D1R in the NAc and provided a possibility that CRF1R antagonist may be a new therapeutic approach for the treatment of propofol addiction.

Propofol but not dexmedetomidine produce locomotor sensitization via nitric oxide in rats

RATIONALE

The abused potential of some anesthetics has been debated. Measurement of locomotor sensitization is a better way to detect the neurobehavioral plasticity of addiction.

OBJECTIVES

The present study aims to explore whether propofol and dexmedetomidine are capable of inducing locomotor sensitization.

METHODS

Male Wistar rats (250-300 g) were the subjects (n = 8 for each group). Propofol (20 and 40 mg/kg) and dexmedetomidine (2.5-20 μg/kg) or saline were injected to rats intraperitoneally (IP), and their locomotor activities were recorded for 15 min. Consequently, L-NAME (30 and 60 mg/kg)-a nitric oxide (NO) inhibitory agent-was injected to rats 30 min before propofol (40 mg/kg) or saline injections, and the locomotor activity was recorded. The process was carried out for 13 days, with 7 sessions applied every other day.

RESULTS

Dexmedetomidine did not produce any significant locomotor sensitization. While propofol (20 mg/kg) produced a significant locomotor sensitization in the last treatment session (day 13), at the higher dose, it prompted a significant locomotor sensitization from the 3rd treatment session. L-NAME blocked propofol-induced locomotor hyperactivity and sensitization significantly without producing any noteworthy changes on the locomotor activity during the testing period of 13 days when administered alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that propofol but not dexmedetomidine produced a significant locomotor sensitization via central nitrergic system. Dexmedetomidine may have a lesser psychostimulant type addictive potential than propofol. Sensitization development by propofol implies that this drug might be effective on the neuroadaptive processes associated with a stimulant type of dependence.

Propofol Inhibits Androgen Production in Rat Immature Leydig Cells

Background: Propofol is a widely used anesthetic. Whether propofol inhibits androgen production by rat Leydig cells and the underlying mechanism remains unclear. The objective of the current study was to examine the effects of propofol exposure to rat primary immature Leydig cells and to define propofol-induced inhibition of steroidogenic enzymes in both rat and human testes in vitro.

Methods: Immature Leydig cells were purified from 35-day-old male Sprague–Dawley rats and were exposed to propofol for 3 h. The androgen production by Leydig cells under basal, luteinizing hormone, 8bromo-cAMP, and steroid-substrate stimulated conditions and gene expression of Leydig cells after exposure to propofol were measured. Immature Leydig cells were treated with propofol for 3 h and switched to propofol-free medium for additional 3 and 9 h to test whether propofol-induced inhibition is reversible. ³H-Steroids were used to evaluate the direct action of propofol on cytochrome P450 cholesterol side chain cleavage (CYP11A1), 3β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (HSD3B), cytochrome P450 17α-hydroxylase/17,20-lyase (CYP17A1), and 17β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase 3 (HSD17B3) activities in rat and human testes in vitro.

Results: Propofol significantly lowered luteinizing hormone and 8bromo-cAMP stimulated androgen production by Leydig cells after 3-h exposure. Further investigation showed that propofol down-regulated the expression of Cyp11a1 and Cyp17a1 and their proteins at 5 and 50 µM, although it up-regulated Lhcgr expression at 50 µM. Propofol significantly suppressed phosphorylation of ERK1/2 and induced ROS production in immature Leydig cells at 5 and 50 µM. Propofol significantly induced apoptosis of immature Leydig cells at 50 µM. Propofol specifically inhibited rat and human testis HSD3B activities in vitro. The half maximal inhibitory concentrations of propofol for rat and human HSD3B enzymes were 1.011 ± 0.065 and 3.498 ± 0.067 µM, respectively. The mode of action of propofol of inhibiting HSD3B was competitive when pregnenolone was added. At 50 µM, propofol did not directly inhibit rat and human testis CYP11A1, CYP17A1, and HSD17B3 activities in vitro.

Conclusion: Propofol inhibits androgen production via both directly inhibiting HSD3B activity and down-regulating Cyp11a1 and Cyp17a1 expression in Leydig cells. Suppression of steroidogenic enzymes is presumably associated with the lower production of androgen by Leydig cells after propofol treatment. However, propofol-induced inhibition on androgen production is reversible.

Neurobiology of Propofol Addiction and Supportive Evidence: What Is the New Development?

Propofol is a short-acting intravenous anesthetic agent suitable for induction and maintenance of general anesthesia as well as for procedural and intensive care unit sedation. As such it has become an unparalleled anesthetic agent of choice in many institutional and office practices. However, in addition to its idealistic properties as an anesthetic agent, there is accumulating evidence suggesting its potential for abuse. Clinical and experimental evidence has revealed that not only does propofol have the potential to be abused, but also that addiction to propofol shows a high mortality rate. Based on this evidence, different researchers have shown interest in determining the probability of propofol to be an addictive agent by comparing it with other drugs of abuse and depicting a functional similitude that involves the mesocorticolimbic pathway of addiction. In light of this, the Drug Enforcement Agency and the American Society of Anesthesiologists have put forth certain safety recommendations for the use of propofol. Despite this, the abuse potential of propofol has been challenged at different levels and therefore the preeminent focus will be to further validate the linkage from medicinal and occasional use of propofol to its addiction, as well as to explore the cellular and molecular targets involved in establishing this linkage, so as to curb the harm arising out of it. This review incorporates the clinical and biomolecular evidence supporting the abuse potential of propofol and brings forth the promising targets and the foreseeable mechanism causing the propofol addiction phenotypes, which can be called upon for future developments in this field.

Brain molecular changes and behavioral alterations induced by propofol anesthesia exposure in peripubertal rats

BACKGROUND

Propofol is commonly used in modern anesthesiology. Some findings suggest that it is highly addictive.

AIM

In this study it was examined whether propofol anesthesia exposure was able to induce behavioral alterations and brain molecular changes already described in addictive drug usage in peripubertal rats, during the onset of mid/periadolescence as a developmental period with increasing vulnerability to drug addiction.

METHODS

The expression of D1 dopamine receptor, a dopamine, and cAMP-regulated phosphoprotein with a Mr 32 000; Ca²⁺ /calmodulin-dependent protein kinase IIα; and Finkel-Biskis-Jinkins murine osteosarcoma viral oncogene homolog-B was examined in peripubertal rats 4, 24, and 48 hour after propofol anesthesia exposure by Western blot and immunohistochemistry. Brain regions of interest were the medial prefrontal cortex, the striatum, and the thalamus. Anxiety and behavioral cross-sensitization to d-amphetamine were examined as well.

RESULTS

Significant increase in the expression of dopamine and cAMP-regulated phosphoprotein with a Mr 32 000 phosphorylated at threonine 34, a postsynaptic marker of dopaminergic neurotransmission, and Finkel-Biskis-Jinkins murine osteosarcoma viral oncogene homolog-B, a marker of neuronal activity, was detected in the thalamus of experimental animals 4-24 hour after the treatment, with the accent on the paraventricular thalamic nucleus. Significant increase in the expression of Ca²⁺ /calmodulin-dependent protein kinase IIα phosphorylated at threonine 286, a sensor of synaptic activity, was observed in the prefrontal cortex and the striatum 24 hour after propofol anesthesia exposure. It was accompanied by a significant decrease in Finkel-Biskis-Jinkins murine osteosarcoma viral oncogene homolog-B expression in the striatum. Decreased behavioral inhibition in aversive environment and increased motor response to d-amphetamine in a context-independent manner were observed as well.

CONCLUSION

In peripubertal rats, propofol anesthesia exposure induces transient molecular and behavioral response that share similarities with those reported previously for addictive drugs. In the absence of additional pharmacological manipulation, all detected effects receded within 48 hour after the treatment.

Ambiente ocupacional e o consumo de substâncias psicoativas entre enfermeiros

Resumo Objetivo Analisar a relação entre o ambiente de trabalho e o consumo de substâncias psicoativas entre enfermeiros hospitalares. Métodos Estudo transversal e descritivo, realizado com enfermeiros de três instituições hospitalares públicas localizados em um município da Região Sul do Brasil, sendo duas de média complexidade e uma de alta complexidade. A população deste estudo foi composta por 221 enfermeiros. Com base nesse número, calculou-se o tamanho amostral por estratos, considerando-se a proporção de 50%, nível de confiança de 95% e erro máximo de 5%, o que resultou no número mínimo de 175 participantes. Mediante a estratificação proporcional por instituição definiu-se o mínimo de 103 enfermeiros da alta complexidade e 36 de cada instituição de média complexidade. Adotou-se como critérios de inclusão: trabalhar na instituição há pelo menos um ano e não estar afastado por licença. A coleta de dados foi realizada entre outubro de 2015 e abril de 2016. Na coleta de dados utilizaram-se informações sociodemográficas e ocupacionais, o Nursing Work Index - Revised e o Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test. Os dados foram analisados no programa Statistical Package for Social Sciences, versão 20.0. Inicialmente, verificou-se a normalidade pelo teste de Kolmogorov-Smirnov. Foram realizadas análises descritivas, por frequências absoluta e relativa para as variáveis categóricas; e medianas e medidas de dispersão para as numéricas. Resultados Álcool, tabaco e sedativos foram as substâncias mais consumidas. Renda mensal apresentou correlação positiva com o consumo de álcool entre enfermeiros dos hospitais de média complexidade (p=0,01). No hospital de alta complexidade, o consumo de álcool relacionou-se negativamente a relação médico-enfermeiro (p=0,03). Autonomia, relação médico-enfermeiro e suporte organizacional estiveram correlacionados negativamente ao uso de sedativos (p<0,01; p<0,01; p=0,02, respectivamente). Conclusão Quanto mais desfavorável o ambiente de trabalho do enfermeiro, sobretudo na relação com médicos, suporte organizacional e autonomia, maior foi o consumo de substâncias psicoativas.

Effects of propofol on conditioned place preference in male rats: Involvement of nitrergic system

BACKGROUND

Drug-induced conditioned place preference (CPP) is linked to the addictive properties of the drug used. The number of studies that have investigated the effects of propofol on CPP is limited. Research findings suggest that nitric oxide (NO) might play an important role in substance use disorders.

OBJECTIVES

The present study sought to investigate the role of the nitrergic system on the rewarding effects of propofol by using the CPP protocol in rats.

METHODS

The experiment followed habituation, pre-conditioning, conditioning, and post conditioning sessions. Male Wistar albino rats weighing 240-290 g were divided into eight groups: control (saline), propofol (10, 20, and 40 mg/kg), the NO synthase (NOS) inhibitor N^G-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) alone (30 and 60 mg/kg), and in combination with propofol (30 and 60 mg/kg L-NAME plus 40 mg/kg propofol) (n = 8 for each group). The CPP effects of propofol, L-NAME, saline, and their combinations were evaluated. All the drug and saline administrations were performed by intraperitoneal (ip) injections.

RESULTS

Propofol (10-40 mg/kg) produced CPP that was statistically significant relative to saline. Propofol-induced CPP was significantly reversed by pretreatment with L-NAME. When administered alone, L-NAME did not produce CPP and also did not produce any significant change on locomotor activity of naïve rats.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that propofol produces CPP effects in rats and that NO-related mechanisms may be responsible for propofol-induced CPP. Thus, propofol might have the potential to be addictive, and this possibility should be considered during clinical applications of this drug.

Recent Insights Into Molecular Mechanisms of Propofol-Induced Developmental Neurotoxicity: Implications for the Protective Strategies

Mounting evidence has demonstrated that general anesthetics could induce developmental neurotoxicity, including acute widespread neuronal cell death, followed by long-term memory and learning abnormalities. Propofol is a commonly used intravenous anesthetic agent for the induction and maintenance of anesthesia and procedural and critical care sedation in children. Compared with other anesthetic drugs, little information is available on its potential contributions to neurotoxicity. Growing evidence from multiple experimental models showed a similar neurotoxic effect of propofol as observed in other anesthetic drugs, raising serious concerns regarding pediatric propofol anesthesia. The aim of this review is to summarize the current findings of propofol-induced developmental neurotoxicity. We first present the evidence of neurotoxicity from animal models, animal cell culture, and human stem cell-derived neuron culture studies. We then discuss the mechanism of propofol-induced developmental neurotoxicity, such as increased cell death in neurons and oligodendrocytes, dysregulation of neurogenesis, abnormal dendritic development, and decreases in neurotrophic factor expression. Recent findings of complex mechanisms of propofol action, including alterations in microRNAs and mitochondrial fission, are discussed as well. An understanding of the toxic effect of propofol and the underlying mechanisms may help to develop effective novel protective or therapeutic strategies for avoiding the neurotoxicity in the developing human brain.

Drug-caused deaths in Australian medical practitioners and health-care professionals

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

There are numerous factors putting health-care professionals (HCP) at a higher risk of substance abuse and premature death, including high-stress jobs, access to controlled substances, long hours of practice and constant contact with the critically ill. This study aimed to examine fatal drug toxicity in this high-risk cohort, in order to: (1) estimate the rate of drug-caused deaths of Australian HCPs; (2) describe the key characteristics of the cohort; and (3) examine the relationship between HCP occupation and drug type, or intent.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

The National Coronial Information System (NCIS), a database of cases reported to an Australian coroner.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 404 drug-caused deaths reported to an Australian coroner between 2003 and 2013 involving HCPs (including medical practitioners, paramedics, nurses, dentists, psychologists, pharmacists and veterinarians).

MEASURES

χ² tests and descriptive statistics were used to examine relationships. The primary outcome measures were drug type and intent. Covariates included occupation type, mental illness and self-harm.

FINDINGS

Females comprised nearly two-thirds of the cohort. The highest number of cases involved nurses (62.87%) and medical practitioners (18.07%). The mortality rate was highest among the veterinary group [confidence interval (CI) = 42.21-58.79]. Most were intentional self-harm deaths (50.25%), followed by unintentional deaths (37.62%) (CI = 92.15-109.85). Mental illness was common, diagnosed in almost half of cases (46.04%), with the majority involving depression (CI = 33.48-44.12). Specific drugs were associated significantly with certain professions, such as intravenous barbiturates among veterinarians (χ²₍₇₎  = 237.391). A number of cases reported additional stressors, such as relationship, work-place or financial issues, and drugs were diverted from the work-place in nearly a fifth of cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Between 2003 and 2013, Australian health-care professionals averaged 37 deaths per year attributed to drug toxicity, with a mortality rate of nearly five deaths per 1000 employed HCPs. Drug-caused deaths among HCPs in Australia commonly involve females in their mid-40s, with a diagnosis of mental illness, personal and professional stress and the intent to self-harm.

Propofol in the treatment of refractory migraine headaches

INTRODUCTION

Refractory/intractable migraine headaches are associated with chronic pain that does not respond to standard care of treatment. Propofol(2,6-diisopropylphenol) in sub-anesthetic doses has been reported to be beneficial in such patients. The present article describes the complete drug profile of propofol in the management of these super-refractory migraine headaches.

AREAS COVERED

The article covers different preclinical and clinical studies available in the literature. Expert commentary: Propofol is useful as an off-label drug molecule in an emergency situation of refractory migraines where it has been found to reduce the pain intensity. The molecule with a narrow therapeutic index and high abuse potential is prescribed only when conventional drugs fail to deliver any relief. There are not adequate double-blind crossover studies that substantiate the effectiveness of propofol in the treatment of migraine headaches. Furthermore, long-term outcomes for the use of propofol in migraine headaches requires an extensive investigation.

Non-opioid anesthetic drug abuse among anesthesia care providers: a narrative review

PURPOSE

The objective of this narrative review is to provide an overview of the problem of non-opioid anesthetic drug abuse among anesthesia care providers (ACPs) and to describe current approaches to screening, therapy, and rehabilitation of ACPs suffering from non-opioid anesthetic drug abuse.

SOURCE

We first performed a search of all literature available on PubMed prior to April 11, 2016. The search was limited to articles published in Spanish and English, and the following key words were used: anesthesiology, anesthesia personnel, AND substance-related disorders. We also searched Ovid MEDLINE^® databases from 1946-April 11, 2016 using the following search terms: anesthesiology OR anesthesia, OR nurse anesthetist OR anesthesia care provider OR perioperative nursing AND substance-related disorders.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Despite an increased awareness of drug abuse among ACPs and improvements in preventive measures, the problem of non-opioid anesthetic drug abuse remains significant. While opioids are the most commonly abused anesthesia medications among ACPs, the abuse of non-opioid anesthetics is a significant cause of morbidity, mortality, and professional demise.

CONCLUSION

Early detection, effective therapy, and long-term follow-up help ACPs cope more effectively with the problem and, when possible, resume their professional activities. There is insufficient evidence to determine the ability of ACPs to return safely to anesthesia practice after rehabilitation, though awareness of the issue and ongoing treatment are necessary to minimize patient risk from potentially related clinical errors.

Locomotor stimulation by acute propofol administration in rats: Role of the nitrergic system

BACKGROUND

The addictive potential of propofol has been scientifically discussed. Drugs' psychostimulant properties that can be assessed via measurements of locomotor activity are linked to their addictive properties. No studies that have investigated the effects of propofol on locomotor activity have been reported to date. The present study sought to investigate the effects and possible mechanisms of action of propofol on locomotor activity in rats.

METHODS

Adult male albino Wistar rats (250-330g) were used as subjects. The locomotor activities of the rats were recorded for 30min immediately following intraperitoneal administration of propofol (20 and 40mg/kg), saline or vehicle (n=8 for each group). NG-nitro arginine methyl ester (l-NAME, 15-60mg/kg), a nitric oxide (NO) synthase inhibitor, and haloperidol (0.125-5mg/kg), a non-specific dopamine receptor antagonist, were also administered to other groups of rats 30min prior to the propofol (40mg/kg) injections, and locomotor activity was recorded for 30min immediately after propofol administration (n=8 for each group).

RESULTS

Propofol produced significant increases in the locomotor activities of the rats in the first 5min of the observation period [F(2,21)=9.052; p<0.001]. l-NAME [F(4,35)=3.112; p=0.02] but not haloperidol [F(4,35)=2.440; p=0.067] pretreatment blocked the propofol-induced locomotor hyperactivity. l-NAME did not cause any significant change in locomotor activity in naïve rats [F(2,21)=0.569; p=0.57].

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that propofol might cause a short-term induction of locomotor activity in rats and that this effect might be related to nitrergic but not dopaminergic mechanisms.

Increased use in propofol and reported patterns of adverse events among anesthetics in Korea

BACKGROUND

Propofol is an addictive drug, and the problem of its abuse and dependence has occurred. To compare the safety profiles of propofol and other similar anesthetics such as diazepam, lorazepam, and midazolam, we evaluated their uses and related adverse drug reactions (ADRs) using Korean Adverse Event Reporting System (KAERS) data.

METHODS

The domestic consumption data and the ADR reports of four anesthetics from 2008 to 2012 were retrieved. ADR proportions were calculated using defined daily dose/1000 inhabitants/day (DID) for the denominator. The patient's characteristics were compared among the four drugs statistically, and the types of ADRs were analyzed.

RESULTS

The consumption and ADR reports increased during the study period, particularly in the cases of propofol and midazolam. Lorazepam showed the highest overall and serious ADR proportions (220.81 reports/DID, 58.47 reports/DID, respectively); however, with respect to death proportion, propofol was the first (19.21 reports/DID). Also, ADRs related to drug addiction were mainly observed in the propofol group.

CONCLUSIONS

Four anesthetics were different with regard to the consumption and proportion or the type of ADRs. The use of propofol increased more than 2 times, and propofol showed the highest ADR proportions in death and drug addiction cases among the four anesthetics.

A Retrospective Survey of Substance Abuse in Anaesthetists in Australia and New Zealand from 2004 to 2013

A questionnaire on substance abuse was distributed electronically to the heads of 185 Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists accredited anaesthesia departments in Australia and New Zealand. The response rate was 57%. From January 2004 to December 2013, 61 cases of substance abuse were identified, giving an estimated incidence of 1.2 cases per 1000 anaesthetist years. Of 44 detailed reports completed, the majority were aged between 30 and 49 years, were male and of specialist grade. However, when corrected for gender and grade, the estimated overall incidence was higher in females and twice as high for trainees compared with specialists. When compared with prior surveys, the pattern of substance abuse in Australia and New Zealand appears to have changed significantly, with a notable increase in propofol and alcohol abuse and a decrease in reported cases of opioid abuse. Common presenting features of abuse included intoxication and witnessed abuse. Seventy percent of cases had more than one comorbid condition, most frequently either mental health or family problems. Only 32% of abusers had made a long-term recovery within the specialty. Death was the eventual outcome in 18% overall, with a particularly high mortality associated with propofol abuse (45%). Trainee suicide from all causes was reported at three times the rate of specialists. The findings indicate that substance abuse remains a significant problem in Australia and New Zealand and is associated with a significant mortality rate.