Limb remote ischemic preconditioning for intestinal and pulmonary protection during elective open infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: a randomized controlled trial. Anesthesiology. 2013;118:842-852. [PMID: 23353795 DOI: 10.1097/aln.0b013e3182850da5]

Remote ischaemic preconditioning on gene expression and circulating proteins after subacute laparoscopic cholecystectomy: randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Surgical stress may lead to postsurgical hypercoagulability, endothelial dysfunction and systemic inflammation, which can impact on patient recovery. Remote ischaemic preconditioning is a procedure that activates the body's endogenous defences against ischaemia and reperfusion injury. Studies have suggested that remote ischaemic preconditioning has antithrombotic, antioxidative and anti-inflammatory effects. The hypothesis was that remote ischaemic preconditioning reduces surgery-induced systemic stress response.

METHOD

During a 24-month period (2019-2021), adult patients undergoing subacute laparoscopic cholecystectomy due to acute cholecystitis were randomized to remote ischaemic preconditioning or control. Remote ischaemic preconditioning was performed less than 4 h before surgery on the upper arm. It consisted of four cycles of 5 min ischaemia and 5 min reperfusion. The gene expression of 750 genes involved in inflammatory processes, oxidative stress and endothelial function was investigated preoperatively and 2-4 h after surgery in both groups. In addition, changes in 20 inflammation- and vascular trauma-associated proteins were assessed preoperatively, 2-4 h after surgery and 24 h after surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 60 patients were randomized. There were no statistically significant differences in gene expression 2-4 h after surgery between the groups (P > 0.05). Remote ischaemic preconditioning did not affect concentrations of circulating proteins up to 24 h after surgery (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The study did not demonstrate any effect of remote ischaemic preconditioning on expression levels of the chosen genes or in circulating immunological cytokines and vascular trauma-associated proteins up to 24 h after subacute laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with acute cholecystitis.

Remote ischemic preconditioning versus sham-control for prevention of anastomotic leakage after resection for rectal cancer (RIPAL trial): a pilot randomized controlled, triple-blinded monocenter trial

PURPOSE

Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) reportedly reduces ischemia‒reperfusion injury (IRI) in various organ systems. In addition to tension and technical factors, ischemia is a common cause of anastomotic leakage (AL) after rectal resection. The aim of this pilot study was to investigate the potentially protective effect of RIPC on anastomotic healing and to determine the effect size to facilitate the development of a subsequent confirmatory trial.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty-four patients with rectal cancer (RC) who underwent anterior resection were enrolled in this prospectively registered (DRKS0001894) pilot randomized controlled triple-blinded monocenter trial at the Department of Surgery, University Medicine Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany, between 10/12/2019 and 19/06/2022. The primary endpoint was AL within 30 days after surgery. The secondary endpoints were perioperative morbidity and mortality, reintervention, hospital stay, readmission and biomarkers of ischemia‒reperfusion injury (vascular endothelial growth factor, VEGF) and cell death (high mobility group box 1 protein, HMGB1). RIPC was induced through three 10-min cycles of alternating ischemia and reperfusion to the upper extremity.

RESULTS

Of the 207 patients assessed, 153 were excluded, leaving 54 patients to be randomized to the RIPC or the sham-RIPC arm (27 each per arm). The mean age was 61 years, and the majority of patients were male (37:17 (68.5:31.5%)). Most of the patients underwent surgery after neoadjuvant therapy (29/54 (53.7%)) for adenocarcinoma (52/54 (96.3%)). The primary endpoint, AL, occurred almost equally frequently in both arms (RIPC arm: 4/25 (16%), sham arm: 4/26 (15.4%), p = 1.000). The secondary outcomes were comparable except for a greater rate of reintervention in the sham arm (9 (6-12) vs. 3 (1-5), p = 0.034). The median duration of endoscopic vacuum therapy was shorter in the RIPC arm (10.5 (10-11) vs. 38 (24-39) days, p = 0.083), although the difference was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

A clinically relevant protective effect of RIPC on anastomotic healing after rectal resection cannot be assumed on the basis of these data.

The New Orientation of Postoperative Analgesia: Remote Ischemic Preconditioning

Purpose of Review

Postoperative analgesia is currently a significant topic in anesthesiology. Currently, the predominant approach for achieving multimodal analgesia involves the utilization of pharmacotherapy and regional anesthesia procedures. The primary objectives of this approach are to mitigate postoperative pain, enhance patient satisfaction, and diminish overall opioid usage. Nevertheless, there is a scarcity of research on the use of remote ischemia preconditioning aimed at mitigating postoperative pain.

Recent Findings

Transient stoppage of blood flow to an organ has been found to elicit remote ischemia preconditioning (RIPC), which serves as a potent intrinsic mechanism for protecting numerous organs. In addition to its established role in protecting against reperfusion injury, RIPC has recently been identified as having potential benefits in the context of postoperative analgesia.

Summary

In addition to traditional perioperative analgesia, RIPC provides perioperative analgesia and organ protection.

Remote ischemic preconditioning for reduction of ischemia-reperfusion injury after hepatectomy: A randomized sham-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Remote ischemic preconditioning reduces ischemia-reperfusion injury in patients undergoing hepatectomy. Moreover, there is evidence that the protective effects of remote ischemic preconditioning may be more pronounced in pre-damaged livers. The objective of this trial was to investigate the extent to which remote ischemic preconditioning can attenuate ischemia-reperfusion injury after hepatectomy and Pringle maneuver in patients with chronic liver disease.

METHODS

In this randomized, controlled, triple-blind monocenter trial, a total of 102 patients with chronic liver disease and planned hepatectomy were enrolled between December 2019 and March 2022. Eligible patients were randomized to the remote ischemic preconditioning or sham arms. Remote ischemic preconditioning was induced through 3 10-minute cycles of alternating ischemia and reperfusion of the upper extremity. The study was prospectively registered in the German Clinical Trials Registry (DRKS00018931).

RESULTS

A total of 102 patients were included in the study and were randomized (51 per arm). The median age was 69.5 years, approximately two-thirds of the patients were male (69/102, 67.7%), and the mean body mass index was 25.6 kg/m2. Most patients were classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists II (55/102, 53.9%) or III (45/102, 44.1%). The primary endpoint, the transaminases on the first postoperative day (alanine aminotransferase /aspartate aminotransferase: remote ischemic preconditioning arm: 250 (35-1721)/320 (42-1525) U/L versus sham control arm: 283 (32-792)/356 (20-1851) U/L, P = .820/0.639), clinical outcomes as well as remote ischemic preconditioning biomarker levels were comparable between both arms.

CONCLUSION

Remote ischemic preconditioning did not achieve a significant reduction in postoperative transaminase levels, nor did it affect clinical results and biomarkers.

Effect of remote ischemic preconditioning on lung function after surgery under general anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) protects organs from ischemia-reperfusion injury. Recent trials showed that RIPC improved gas exchange in patients undergoing lung or cardiac surgery. We performed a systematic search to identify randomized controlled trials involving RIPC in surgery under general anesthesia. The primary outcome was the PaO2/FIO2 (P/F) ratio at 24 h after surgery. Secondary outcomes were A-a DO2, the respiratory index, duration of postoperative mechanical ventilation (MV), incidence of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and serum cytokine levels. The analyses included 71 trials comprising 7854 patients. Patients with RIPC showed higher P/F ratio than controls (mean difference [MD] 36.6, 95% confidence interval (CI) 12.8 to 60.4, I2 = 69%). The cause of heterogeneity was not identified by the subgroup analysis. Similarly, A-a DO2 (MD 15.2, 95% CI - 29.7 to - 0.6, I2 = 87%) and respiratory index (MD - 0.17, 95% CI - 0.34 to - 0.01, I2 = 94%) were lower in the RIPC group. Additionally, the RIPC group was weaned from MV earlier (MD - 0.9 h, 95% CI - 1.4 to - 0.4, I2 = 78%). Furthermore, the incidence of ARDS was lower in the RIPC group (relative risk 0.73, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.89, I2 = 0%). Serum TNFα was lower in the RIPC group (SMD - 0.6, 95%CI - 1.0 to - 0.3 I2 = 87%). No significant difference was observed in interleukin-6, 8 and 10. Our meta-analysis suggested that RIPC improved oxygenation after surgery under general anesthesia.Clinical trial number: This study protocol was registered in the University Hospital Medical Information Network (registration number: UMIN000030918), https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000035305.

Remote ischemic conditioning in necrotizing enterocolitis

Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is a devastating intestinal inflammatory disorder, most prevalent in premature infants, and associated with a high mortality rate that has remained unchanged in the past two decades. NEC is characterized by inflammation, ischemia, and impaired microcirculation in the intestine. Preclinical studies by our group have led to the discovery of remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) as a promising non-invasive intervention in protecting the intestine against ischemia-induced damage during early-stage NEC. RIC involves the administration of brief reversible cycles of ischemia and reperfusion in a limb (similar to taking standard blood pressure measurement) which activate endogenous protective signaling pathways that are conveyed to distant organs such as the intestine. RIC targets the intestinal microcirculation and by improving blood flow to the intestine, reduces the intestinal damage of experimental NEC and prolongs survival. A recent Phase I safety study by our group demonstrated that RIC was safe in preterm infants with NEC. A phase II feasibility randomized controlled trial involving 12 centers in 6 countries is currently underway, to investigate the feasibility of RIC as a treatment for early-stage NEC in preterm neonates. This review provides a brief background on RIC as a therapeutic strategy and summarizes the progression of RIC as a treatment for NEC from preclinical investigation to clinical evaluation.

Primary graft dysfunction following lung transplantation: From pathogenesis to future frontiers

Lung transplantation is the treatment of choice for patients with end-stage lung disease. Currently, just under 5000 lung transplants are performed worldwide annually. However, a major scourge leading to 90-d and 1-year mortality remains primary graft dysfunction. It is a spectrum of lung injury ranging from mild to severe depending on the level of hypoxaemia and lung injury post-transplant. This review aims to provide an in-depth analysis of the epidemiology, pathophysiology, risk factors, outcomes, and future frontiers involved in mitigating primary graft dysfunction. The current diagnostic criteria are examined alongside changes from the previous definition. We also highlight the issues surrounding chronic lung allograft dysfunction and identify the novel therapies available for ex-vivo lung perfusion. Although primary graft dysfunction remains a significant contributor to 90-d and 1-year mortality, ongoing research and development abreast with current technological advancements have shed some light on the issue in pursuit of future diagnostic and therapeutic tools.

Effect of Remote Ischaemic Preconditioning on Perioperative Endothelial Dysfunction in Non-Cardiac Surgery: A Randomised Clinical Trial

Endothelial dysfunction result from inflammation and excessive production of reactive oxygen species as part of the surgical stress response. Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) potentially exerts anti-oxidative and anti-inflammatory properties, which might stabilise the endothelial function after non-cardiac surgery. This was a single centre randomised clinical trial including 60 patients undergoing sub-acute laparoscopic cholecystectomy due to acute cholecystitis. Patients were randomised to RIPC or control. The RIPC procedure consisted of four cycles of five minutes of ischaemia and reperfusion of one upper extremity. Endothelial function was assessed as the reactive hyperaemia index (RHI) and circulating biomarkers of nitric oxide (NO) bioavailability (L-arginine, asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA), L-arginine/ADMA ratio, tetra- and dihydrobiopterin (BH4 and BH2), and total plasma biopterin) preoperative, 2–4 h after surgery and 24 h after surgery. RHI did not differ between the groups (p = 0.07). Neither did levels of circulating biomarkers of NO bioavailability change in response to RIPC. L-arginine and L-arginine/ADMA ratio was suppressed preoperatively and increased 24 h after surgery (p < 0.001). The BH4/BH2-ratio had a high preoperative level, decreased 2–4 h after surgery and remained low 24 h after surgery (p = 0.01). RIPC did not influence endothelial function or markers of NO bioavailability until 24 h after sub-acute laparoscopic cholecystectomy. In response to surgery, markers of NO bioavailability increased, and oxidative stress decreased. These findings support that a minimally invasive removal of the inflamed gallbladder countereffects reduced markers of NO bioavailability and increased oxidative stress caused by acute cholecystitis.

Effect of remote ischemic preconditioning on postoperative gastrointestinal function in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection

PURPOSE

Patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection have a high incidence of postoperative gastrointestinal dysfunction (POGD). Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) is an organ protection measure. The study investigated the effect of RIPC on postoperative gastrointestinal function.

METHODS

In this single-center, prospective, double-blinded, randomized, parallel-controlled trial, 100 patients undergoing elective laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive RIPC or sham RIPC (control). Three cycles of 5-min ischemia/5-min reperfusion induced by a blood pressure cuff placed on the right upper arm served as RIPC stimulus. Patients were followed up continuously for 7 days after surgery. The I-FEED score was used to evaluate the patient's gastrointestinal function after the surgery. The primary outcome of the study was the I-FEED score on POD3. Secondary outcomes include the daily I-FEED scores, the highest I-FEED score, the incidence of POGD, the changes in I-FABP and the inflammatory markers (IL-6 and TNF-α), and the time to first postoperative flatus.

RESULTS

A total of 100 patients were enrolled in the study, of which 13 patients were excluded. Finally, 87 patients were included in the analysis, 44 patients in the RIPC group and 43 patients in the sham-RIPC group. Patients assigned to the RIPC group had a lower I-FEED score on POD3 compared with the sham-RIPC group (mean difference 0.86; 95% CI: 0.06 to 1.65; P = 0.035). And patients in the RIPC group were also associated with a lower I-FEED score on POD4 vs the sham-RIPC group (mean difference 0.81; 95% CI: 0.03 to 1.60; P = 0.043). Compared with the sham-RIPC group, the incidence of POGD within 7 days after surgery was lower in the RIPC group (P = 0.040). At T₁, T₂, and T₃ time points, inflammatory factors and I-FABP were considerably less in the RIPC group compared to the sham-RIPC group. The time to the first flatus and the first feces was similar in both groups.

CONCLUSION

RIPC reduced I-FEED scores, decreased the incidence of postoperative gastrointestinal dysfunction, and lowered concentrations of I-FABP and inflammatory factors.

Augmented Parkin-dependent mitophagy underlies the hepatoprotective effect of remote ischemic conditioning used prior to hemorrhagic shock

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Hemorrhagic shock-resuscitation (HSR) following trauma contributes to organ dysfunction by causing ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI). We previously showed that 'remote ischemic preconditioning' (RIPC) exerted multi-organ protection from IRI. Maintenance of mitochondrial quality by clearance of dysfunctional mitochondria via mitophagy is vital in restoring organ integrity. We hypothesized that parkin-dependent mitophagy played a role in RIPC-induced hepatoprotection following HSR.

METHODS

The hepatoprotective effect of RIPC in a murine model of HSR-IRI was investigated in wild type and parkin-/- animals. Mice were subjected to HSR ± RIPC and blood and organs were collected, followed by cytokine ELISAs, histology, qPCR, Western blots, and transmission electron microscopy.

RESULTS

HSR increased hepatocellular injury, as measured by plasma ALT and liver necrosis, while antecedent RIPC prevented this injury; in parkin^-/- mice, RIPC failed to exert hepatoprotection. The ability of RIPC to lessen HSR-induced rises in plasma IL-6 and TNFα, was lost in parkin^-/- mice. While RIPC alone did not induce mitophagy, the application of RIPC prior to HSR caused a synergistic increase in mitophagy, this increase was not observed in parkin^-/- mice. RIPC induced shifts in mitochondrial morphology favoring mitophagy in WT but not in parkin^-/- animals.

CONCLUSIONS

RIPC was hepatoprotective in WT mice following HSR but not in parkin^-/- mice. Loss of protection in parkin^-/- mice corresponded with the failure of RIPC plus HSR to upregulate the mitophagic process. Improving mitochondrial quality by modulating mitophagy, may prove to be an attractive therapeutic target in disease processes caused by IRI.

Remote ischaemic preconditioning versus no remote ischaemic preconditioning for vascular and endovascular surgical procedures

BACKGROUND

Despite advances in perioperative care, elective major vascular surgical procedures still carry a significant risk of morbidity and mortality. Remote ischaemic preconditioning (RIPC) is the temporary blocking of blood flow to vascular beds remote from those targeted by surgery. It has the potential to provide local tissue protection from further prolonged periods of ischaemia. However, the efficacy and safety of RIPC in people undergoing major vascular surgery remain unknown. This is an update of a review published in 2011.  OBJECTIVES: To assess the benefits and harms of RIPC versus no RIPC in people undergoing elective major vascular and endovascular surgery.

SEARCH METHODS

The Cochrane Vascular Information Specialist searched the Cochrane Vascular Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL databases and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform and ClinicalTrials.gov to 1 April 2022.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included all randomised controlled trials that evaluated the role of RIPC in reducing perioperative mortality and morbidities in people undergoing elective major vascular or endovascular surgery.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We collected data on the characteristics of the trial, methodological quality, and the remote ischaemic preconditioning stimulus used. Our primary outcome was perioperative mortality, and secondary outcomes included myocardial infarction, renal impairment, stroke, hospital stay, limb loss, and operating time or total anaesthetic time. We analysed the data using random-effects models. For each outcome, we calculated the risk ratio (RR) or mean difference (MD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) based on an intention-to-treat analysis. In addition, we used GRADE to assess the certainty of the evidence for each outcome.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 14 trials which randomised a total of 1295 participants (age range: 64.5 to 76 years; 84% male; study periods ranged from 2003 to 2019). In general, the included studies were at low to unclear risk of bias for most risk of bias domains. The certainty of evidence of main outcomes was moderate due to imprecision of results, moderate heterogeneity, or possible publication bias. We found that RIPC made no clear difference in perioperative mortality compared with no RIPC (RR 1.41, 95% CI 0.59 to 3.40; I2 = 0%; 10 studies, 965 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Similarly, we found no clear difference between the two groups for myocardial infarction (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.49 to 1.40; I2 = 7%; 11 studies, 1001 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), renal impairment (RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.62 to 1.86; I2 = 40%; 12 studies, 1054 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), stroke (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.04 to 3.15; I2 = 0%; 4 studies, 392 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), limb loss (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.05 to 10.61; I2 = 32%; 3 studies, 322 participants; low-certainty evidence), hospital stay (MD -0.94 day, 95% CI -1.95 to 0.07; I2 = 17%; 7 studies, 569 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), and operating time or total anaesthetic time (MD 5.76 minutes, 95% CI -3.25 to 14.76; I2 = 44%; 10 studies, 803 participants; moderate-certainty evidence).  AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Overall, compared with no RIPC, RIPC probably leads to little or no difference in perioperative mortality, myocardial infarction, renal impairment, stroke, hospital stay, and operating time, and may lead to little or no difference in limb loss in people undergoing elective major vascular and endovascular surgery. Adequately powered and designed randomised studies are needed, focusing in particular on the clinical endpoints and patient-centred outcomes.

Remote ischemic conditioning in necrotizing enterocolitis: study protocol of a multi-center phase II feasibility randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE

Remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) is a maneuver involving brief cycles of ischemia reperfusion in an individual's limb. In the early stage of experimental NEC, RIC decreased intestinal injury and prolonged survival by counteracting the derangements in intestinal microcirculation. A single-center phase I study demonstrated that the performance of RIC was safe in neonates with NEC. The aim of this phase II RCT was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of RIC, to identify challenges in recruitment, retainment, and to inform a phase III RCT to evaluate efficacy.

METHODS

RIC will be performed by trained research personnel and will consist of four cycles of limb ischemia (4-min via cuff inflation) followed by reperfusion (4-min via cuff deflation), repeated on two consecutive days post randomization. The primary endpoint of this RCT is feasibility and acceptability of recruiting and randomizing neonates within 24 h from NEC diagnosis as well as masking and completing the RIC intervention.

RESULTS

We created a novel international consortium for this trial and created a consensus on the diagnostic criteria for NEC and protocol for the trial. The phase II multicenter-masked feasibility RCT will be conducted at 12 centers in Canada, USA, Sweden, The Netherlands, UK, and Spain. The inclusion criteria are: gestational age < 33 weeks, weight ≥ 750 g, NEC receiving medical treatment, and diagnosis established within previous 24 h. Neonates will be randomized to RIC (intervention) or no-RIC (control) and will continue to receive standard management of NEC. We expect to recruit and randomize 40% of eligible patients in the collaborating centers (78 patients; 39/arm) in 30 months. Bayesian methods will be used to combine uninformative prior distributions with the corresponding observed proportions from this trial to determine posterior distributions for parameters of feasibility.

CONCLUSIONS

The newly established NEC consortium has generated novel data on NEC diagnosis and defined the feasibility parameters for the introduction of a novel treatment in NEC. This phase II RCT will inform a future phase III RCT to evaluate the efficacy and safety of RIC in early-stage NEC.

Mitochondrial DNA Release Contributes to Intestinal Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury

Mitochondria release many damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) when cells are damaged or stressed, with mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) being. MtDNA activates innate immune responses and induces inflammation through the TLR-9, NLRP3 inflammasome, and cGAS-STING signaling pathways. Released inflammatory factors cause damage to intestinal barrier function. Many bacteria and endotoxins migrate to the circulatory system and lymphatic system, leading to systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and even damaging the function of multiple organs throughout the body. This process may ultimately lead to multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS). Recent studies have shown that various factors, such as the release of mtDNA and the massive infiltration of inflammatory factors, can cause intestinal ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury. This destroys intestinal barrier function, induces an inflammatory storm, leads to SIRS, increases the vulnerability of organs, and develops into MODS. Mitophagy eliminates dysfunctional mitochondria to maintain cellular homeostasis. This review discusses mtDNA release during the pathogenesis of intestinal I/R and summarizes methods for the prevention or treatment of intestinal I/R. We also discuss the effects of inflammation and increased intestinal barrier permeability on drugs.

The effects of ischaemic conditioning on lung ischaemia-reperfusion injury

Ischaemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) encompasses the deleterious effects on cellular function and survival that result from the restoration of organ perfusion. Despite their unique tolerance to ischaemia and hypoxia, afforded by their dual (pulmonary and bronchial) circulation as well as direct oxygen diffusion from the airways, lungs are particularly susceptible to IRI (LIRI). LIRI may be observed in a variety of clinical settings, including lung transplantation, lung resections, cardiopulmonary bypass during cardiac surgery, aortic cross-clamping for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, as well as tourniquet application for orthopaedic operations. It is a diagnosis of exclusion, manifesting clinically as acute lung injury (ALI) or acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Ischaemic conditioning (IC) signifies the original paradigm of treating IRI. It entails the application of short, non-lethal ischemia and reperfusion manoeuvres to an organ, tissue, or arterial territory, which activates mechanisms that reduce IRI. Interestingly, there is accumulating experimental and preliminary clinical evidence that IC may ameliorate LIRI in various pathophysiological contexts. Considering the detrimental effects of LIRI, ranging from ALI following lung resections to primary graft dysfunction (PGD) after lung transplantation, the association of these entities with adverse outcomes, as well as the paucity of protective or therapeutic interventions, IC holds promise as a safe and effective strategy to protect the lung. This article aims to provide a narrative review of the existing experimental and clinical evidence regarding the effects of IC on LIRI and prompt further investigation to refine its clinical application.

Sesamin Protects against and Ameliorates Rat Intestinal Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury with Involvement of Activating Nrf2/HO-1/NQO1 Signaling Pathway

Intestinal ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) may induce cell/tissue injuries, leading to multiple organ failure. Based on our preexperiments, we proposed that sesamin could protect against and ameliorate intestinal I/R injuries and related disorders with involvement of activating Nrf2 signaling pathway. This proposal was evaluated using SD intestinal I/R injury rats in vivo and hypoxia/reoxygenation- (H/R-) injured rat small intestinal crypt epithelial cell line (IEC-6 cells) in vitro. Sesamin significantly alleviated I/R-induced intestinal histopathological injuries and significantly reduced serum biochemical indicators ALT and AST, alleviating I/R-induced intestinal injury in rats. Sesamin also significantly reversed I/R-increased TNF-α, IL-6, IL-1β, and MPO activity in serum and MDA in tissues and I/R-decreased GSH in tissues and SOD in both tissues and IEC-6 cells, indicating its anti-inflammatory and antioxidative stress effects. Further, sesamin significantly decreased TUNEL-positive cells, downregulated the increased Bax and caspase-3 protein expression, upregulated the decreased protein expression of Bcl-2 in I/R-injured intestinal tissues, and significantly reversed H/R-reduced IEC-6 cell viability as well as reduced the number of apoptotic cells among H/R-injured IEC-6 cell, showing antiapoptotic effects. Activation of Nrf2 is known to ameliorate tissue/cell injuries. Consistent with sesamin-induced ameliorations of both intestinal I/R injuries and H/R injuries, transfection of Nrf2 cDNA significantly upregulated the expression of Nrf2, HO-1, and NQO1, respectively. On the contrary, either Nrf2 inhibitor (ML385) or Nrf2 siRNA transfection significantly decreased the expression of these proteins. Our results suggest that activation of the Nrf2/HO-1/NQO1 signaling pathway is involved in sesamin-induced anti-inflammatory, antioxidative, and antiapoptotic effects in protection against and amelioration of intestinal I/R injuries.

Effect of Remote Ischemic Conditioning on Bleeding Complications in Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) is administered with an inflatable tourniquet by inducing brief, alternating cycles of limb ischemia and reperfusion. RIC possibly impacts the hemostatic system, and the intervention has been tested as protective therapy against ischemia-reperfusion injury and thrombotic complications in cardiac surgery and other surgical procedures. In the present systematic review, we aimed to investigate the effect of RIC on intraoperative and postoperative bleeding complications in meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials including adult patients undergoing surgery. A systematic search was performed on November 7, 2020 in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Randomized controlled trials comparing RIC versus no RIC in adult patients undergoing surgery that reported bleeding outcomes in English publications were included. Effect estimates with 95% confidence intervals were calculated using the random-effects model for intraoperative and postoperative bleeding outcomes. Thirty-two randomized controlled trials with 3,804 patients were eligible for inclusion. RIC did not affect intraoperative bleeding volume (nine trials; 392 RIC patients, 399 controls) with the effect estimate -0.95 [-9.90; 7.99] mL (p = 0.83). RIC significantly reduced postoperative drainage volume (seven trials; 367 RIC patients, 365 controls) with mean difference -83.6 [-134.9; -32.4] mL (p = 0.001). The risk of re-operation for bleeding was reduced in the RIC group (16 trials; 838 RIC patients, 839 controls), albeit not significantly, with the relative risk 0.65 [0.39; 1.09] (p = 0.10). In conclusion, RIC reduced postoperative bleeding measured by postoperative drainage volume in this meta-analysis of adult patients undergoing surgery.

Effects of Dexmedetomidine on Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer

BACKGROUND

Pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopic surgery has a systemic impact on the renal system and might contribute to acute kidney injury or postoperative renal dysfunction. However, effective preventive strategies are still lacking. We aimed to explore the effects of dexmedetomidine (DEX) on kidney and other organ function in patients undergoing elective laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty-six patients were randomly enrolled into the Control or DEX group. The DEX group received 1 µg kg^-1 DEX intravenously within 10 min followed by a maintenance dose of 0.5 µg kg^-1 h^-1 infused until 30 min before closing the peritoneum. In the Control group, 0.9% sodium chloride was administered as a placebo. The primary outcome was serum neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) levels reflecting kidney injury. Secondary outcomes included variables reflecting the kidney, intestinal injury and systemic inflammatory response.

RESULTS

NGAL levels were significantly lower in the DEX group than in the Control group at 1 d and 5 d postoperatively (107.5 ± 55.6 ng mL^-1versus 179.5 ± 78.2 ng mL^-1; 70.3 ± 45.8 ng mL^-1versus 135.2 ± 59.6 ng mL^-1, P < 0.001), while the BUN and Cr levels showed no differences between the groups. Serum DAO activity was significantly lower in the DEX group patients 24 h after surgery. Moreover, I-FABP levels were markedly lower at 2 h and 24 h postoperatively in the DEX group than in the Control group (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Perioperative DEX administration may potentially confer kidney and intestinal protection during laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer patients.

Pulmonary effects of dexmedetomidine infusion in thoracic aortic surgery under hypothermic circulatory arrest: a randomized placebo-controlled trial

Dexmedetomidine has emerged as a promising organ protective agent. We performed prospective randomized placebo-controlled trial investigating effects of perioperative dexmedetomidine infusion on pulmonary function following thoracic aortic surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass and moderate hypothermic circulatory arrest. Fifty-two patients were randomized to two groups: the dexmedetomidine group received 1 µg/kg of dexmedetomidine over 20 min after induction of anesthesia, followed by 0.5 µg/kg/h infusion until 12 h after aortic cross clamp (ACC)-off, while the control group received the same volume of normal saline. The primary endpoints were oxygenation indices including arterial O2 partial pressure (PaO2) to alveolar O2 partial pressure ratio (a/A ratio), (A-a) O2 gradient, PaO2/FiO2 and lung mechanics including peak inspiratory and plateau pressures and compliances, which were assessed after anesthesia induction, 1 h, 6 h, 12 h, and 24 h after ACC-off. The secondary endpoints were serum biomarkers including interleukin-6, tumor necrosis factor-α, superoxide dismutase, and malondialdehyde (MDA). As a result, dexmedetomidine did not confer protective effects on the lungs, but inhibited elevation of serum MDA level, indicative of anti-oxidative stress property, and improved urine output and lower requirements of vasopressors.

Effect of remote ischaemic preconditioning on mortality and morbidity after non-cardiac surgery: meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Remote ischaemic preconditioning (RIPC) has been shown to have a protective role on vital organs exposed to reperfusion injury. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the effects of non-invasive RIPC on clinical and biochemical outcomes in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery.

METHODS

A systematic literature search of PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Cochrane databases was carried out in February 2020. RCTs investigating the effect of non-invasive RIPC in adults undergoing non-cardiac surgery were included. Meta-analyses and trial sequential analyses (TSAs) were performed on cardiovascular events, acute kidney injury, and short- and long-term mortality.

RESULTS

Some 43 RCTs including 3660 patients were included. The surgical areas comprised orthopaedic, vascular, abdominal, pulmonary, neurological, and urological surgery. Meta-analysis showed RIPC to be associated with fewer cardiovascular events in non-cardiac surgery (13 trials, 1968 patients, 421 events; odds ratio (OR) 0.68, 95 per cent c.i. 0.47 to 0.96; P = 0.03). Meta-analyses of the effect of RIPC on acute kidney injury (12 trials, 1208 patients, 211 events; OR 1.14, 0.78 to 1.69; P = 0.50; I2 = 9 per cent), short-term mortality (7 trials, 1239 patients, 65 events; OR 0.65, 0.37 to 1.12; P = 0.12; I2 = 0 per cent), and long-term mortality (4 trials, 1167 patients, 9 events; OR 0.67, 0.18 to 2.55; P = 0.56; I2 = 0 per cent) showed no significant differences for RIPC compared with standard perioperative care in non-cardiac surgery. However, TSAs showed that the required information sizes have not yet been reached.

CONCLUSION

Application of RIPC to non-cardiac surgery might reduce cardiovascular events, but not acute kidney injury or all-cause mortality, but currently available data are inadequate to confirm or reject an assumed intervention effect.

The effect of remote ischaemic conditioning on blood pressure response: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Previous work has evaluated the effect of remote ischaemic conditioning (RIC) in a number of clinical conditions (e.g. cardiac surgery and acute kidney injury), but only one analysis has examined blood pressure (BP) changes. While individual studies have reported the effects of acute bouts and repeated RIC exposure on resting BP, efficacy is equivocal. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effects of acute and repeat RIC on BP.

METHODS

A systematic search was performed using PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library of Controlled Trials up until October 31, 2020. Additionally, manual searches of reference lists were performed. Studies that compared BP responses after exposing participants to either an acute bout or repeated cycles of RIC with a minimum one-week intervention period were considered.

RESULTS

Eighteen studies were included in this systematic review, ten examined acute effects while eight investigated repeat effects of RIC. Mean differences (MD) for outcome measures from acute RIC studies were: systolic BP 0.18 mmHg (95%CI -0.95, 1.31; p = 0.76), diastolic BP -0.43 mmHg (95%CI -2.36, 1.50; p = 0.66), MAP -1.73 mmHg (95%CI -3.11, -0.34; p = 0.01) and HR -1.15 bpm (95%CI -2.92, 0.62; p = 0.20). Only MAP was significantly reduced. Repeat RIC exposure showed non-significant change in systolic BP -3.23 mmHg (95%CI -6.57, 0.11; p = 0.06) and HR -0.16 bpm (95%CI -7.08, 6.77; p = 0.96) while diastolic BP -2.94 mmHg (95%CI -4.08, -1.79; p < 0.00001) and MAP -3.21 mmHg (95%CI -4.82, -1.61; p < 0.0001) were significantly reduced.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggests repeated, but not acute, RIC produced clinically meaningful reductions in diastolic BP and MAP.

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Preventative Strategies for Acute Kidney Injury in Patients Undergoing Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

BACKGOUND

To assess the effect of various preventative interventions for reducing the incidence of postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients undergoing elective abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair.

METHODS

We included randomized controlled trials of 10 patients or more which tested a preventative intervention versus standard therapy or placebo in patients undergoing elective AAA repair using the open or endovascular approach. Studies including mixed patient populations such as those with aortic occlusive disease, thoracoabdominal aneurysms or ruptured aneurysms were ineligible for review. We searched Medline (1966-2019), EMBASE (1947-2019), CINAHL (1961-2019), Web of Science (1945-2019), Scopus (1966-2019), and The Cochrane Library (1996-2019) for trials available as published manuscripts in English. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration risk of bias tool. Where possible we pooled the results of similar interventions using random effects meta-analysis.

RESULTS

We included 17 trials involving 1443 participants. Most trials were small, single-center studies, with varying definitions of AKI and a high or moderate risk of bias. The preventative strategies with possible protective effects were mannitol, a composite of antioxidant supplements, an open extraperitoneal approach, and human atrial natriuretic peptide (hANP). Curcumin, methylprednisolone, carbon dioxide contrast medium, hemodynamic monitoring and N-acetylcysteine were found to be ineffective. Six trials with a total of 355 participants reported on remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) and our meta-analysis showed no statistically significant difference between RIPC and standard treatment (OR 1.20, 95% CI 0.37, 3.89); although the results should be interpreted with caution due to considerable statistical heterogeneity (I² = 70%). None of the interventions studied significantly reduced receipt of renal replacement therapy (RRT).

CONCLUSIONS

Interventions that have shown some potential to reduce AKI after AAA repair include mannitol, a composite of antioxidant supplements, an open extraperitoneal approach and hANP. These conclusions are limited by the small size, high risk of bias and inconsistency of the included trials. Large, high quality, multi-center randomized trials will help determine which interventions are effective in reducing the incidence of postoperative AKI among patients undergoing elective AAA repair.

Microarray Profiling and Functional Identification of LncRNA in Mice Intestinal Mucosa Following Intestinal Ischemia/Reperfusion

BACKGROUND

Intestinal ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury is a common clinical event with high mortality, but its mechanism is elusive. Although long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) have recently emerged as critical molecules in I/R damage in other organs, the changes in their expression and potential roles in intestinal I/R remain unclear.

METHODS

The expression profiles of both lncRNAs and mRNAs in mouse intestinal mucosa after intestinal I/R were explored by a microarray approach, and their biological functions were elucidated by gene ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analyses. Then, some lncRNAs were further verified by qRT-PCR. Based on the coding-noncoding gene coexpression (CNC) network analyses, the role of lncRNA AK089510 in intestinal I/R-induced intestinal mucosa apoptosis was investigated by knockdown assay in vitro.

RESULTS

A total of 3602 aberrantly expressed lncRNAs (1503 upregulated and 2099 downregulated) and 3158 mRNAs (1528 upregulated and 1630 downregulated) were identified. The dysregulated transcripts were enriched in the lipid metabolic process, apoptotic process, reactive oxygen species metabolic process, MAPK, TNF, ErbB, mTOR, and FoxO signaling pathways, and so on. The overexpression of lncRNA AK089510 was validated by qRT-PCR, and the CNC analysis revealed its target mRNAs. AK089510-siRNA reduced Casp6 and Casp7 expression and suppressed intestinal epithelial cell apoptosis after oxygen-glucose deprivation treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study revealed the lncRNA and mRNA expression patterns in mouse intestinal mucosa after intestinal I/R and predicted their potential functions and pathways. We identified AK089510 as a novel lncRNA involved in the apoptosis of intestinal mucosa, advancing our understanding of the molecular mechanisms of intestinal I/R injury.

Remote Ischemic Preconditioning in Non-cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) may mitigate physiological stress related to surgery. There is no clear consensus on conduct of RIPC studies, or whether it is effective. The aim of this study was to (i) assess delivery of RIPC, (ii) identify reported outcomes, (iii) measure effect on key clinical outcomes.

METHODS

This review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD:42020180725). EMBASE and Medline databases were searched, and results screened by two reviewers. Full-texts were assessed for eligibility by two reviewers. Data extracted were methods of RIPC and outcomes reported. Meta-analysis of key clinical events was performed using a Mantel-Haenszel random effects model. The TIDieR framework was used to assess intervention reporting, and Cochrane risk of bias tool was used for all studies included.

RESULTS

Searches identified 25 studies; 25 were included in the narrative analysis and 18 in the meta-analysis. RIPC was frequently performed by occluding arm circulation (15/25), at 200 mmHg (9/25), with three cycles of 5 min ischemia and 5 min of reperfusion (16/25). No study fulfilled all 12 TIDieR items (mean score 7.68). Meta-analysis showed no benefit of RIPC on MI (OR 0.71 95% CI 0.48-1.04, I2 = 0%), mortality (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.31-1.01, I2 = 0%), or acute kidney injury (OR 0.72 95% CI 0.48-1.08).

CONCLUSIONS

RIPC could be standardized as 200 mmHg pressure in 3 × 5 min on and off cycles. The signal of benefit should be explored in a larger well-designed randomized trial.

Cardiovascular events in patients undergoing hip fracture surgery treated with remote ischaemic preconditioning: 1-year follow-up of a randomised clinical trial

Remote ischaemic preconditioning reduces the risk of myocardial injury within 4 days of hip fracture surgery. We aimed to investigate the effect of remote ischaemic preconditioning on the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events 1 year after hip fracture surgery. We performed a phase-2, multicentre, randomised, observer-blinded, clinical trial between February 2015 and September 2017. We studied patients aged ≥ 45 years with a hip fracture and a minimum of one cardiovascular risk factor. Patients were allocated randomly to remote ischaemic preconditioning applied just before surgery or no treatment (control group). Remote ischaemic preconditioning was performed on the upper arm with a tourniquet in four cycles of 5 min ischaemia and 5 min reperfusion. Primary outcome was the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events within 1 year of surgery. A total of 316 patients were allocated randomly to the remote ischaemic preconditioning group and 309 patients to the control group. Major adverse cardiovascular events occurred in 43 patients (13.6%) in the remote ischaemic preconditioning group compared with 51 patients (16.5%) in the control group (adjusted hazard ratio (95%CI) 0.83 (0.55-1.25); p = 0.37). Fewer patients in the remote ischaemic preconditioning group had a myocardial infarction (11 (3.5%) vs. 22 (7.1%); hazard ratio (95%CI) 0.48 (CI 0.23-1.00); p = 0.04). Remote ischaemic preconditioning did not reduce the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events within 1 year of hip fracture surgery. The effect of remote ischaemic preconditioning on clinical cardiovascular outcomes in non-cardiac surgery needs confirmation in appropriately powered randomised clinical trials.

The Impact of Remote Ischaemic Conditioning on Beat-to-Beat Heart Rate Variability Circadian Rhythm in Healthy Adults

BACKGROUND

Remote ischaemic conditioning (RIC) is an intervention that may exert a protective effect over multiple tissues or organs by regulating neuronal signal transduction. Heart rate variability (HRV) can assess the state of the autonomic nervous system. However, whether RIC can also regulate HRV in humans remains unknown.

METHOD

This was a self-controlled interventional study in which serial beat-to-beat monitoring was performed at the same seven time points (7, 9, and 11 AM; 2, 5, and 8 PM; and 8 AM on the next day) with or without RIC in 50 healthy adults. The seven time points on the RIC day were defined as baseline, 1 hour, 3 hours, 6 hours, 9 hours, 12 hours, and 24 hours after RIC. The RIC protocol consisted of 4×5-minute inflation/deflation in one arm and one thigh cuff at 200 mmHg pressure from 7:20 to 8 AM. This study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02965547).

RESULTS

We included 50 healthy adult volunteers (aged 34.54±12.01 years, 22 men [44%], all Asian). The variables analysed in frequency-domain measures performed as power of low-frequency in normalised units (0.04-0.15 Hz), high-frequency in normalised units (0.15-0.40 Hz), and ratio of low frequency to high frequency. The time-domain parameters standard deviation (SD) of all normal to normal (NN) intervals (SDNN), mean of the 5-minute SD of the NN intervals, SD of the consecutive 5-minute averages of NN intervals, and the root mean square of successive differences of NN intervals, and time-domain parameters calculated from Poincaré plots, SD of the short diagonal axis in Poincaré plot (SD1), SD of the long diagonal axis in Poincaré plot (SD2), and SD1/SD2 were also obtained. The SDNN and SD2 significantly increased 1 hour after RIC (p=0.029 and p=0.045, respectively). Additionally, the SD2 increased a second time 12 hours after RIC (p=0.041), which represented inhibited sympathetic activity.

CONCLUSIONS

Heart rate variability increase and sympathetic inhibition induced by RIC appeared both on the early and delayed protective window of RIC, which may indicate some of the underlying mechanisms by which RIC may offer protection.

Protocol of supra-visceral aortic ischemic preconditioning for open surgical repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm : The EPICATA study (Evaluation of the Efficacy of Ischemic PreConditioning on morbidity and mortality in open ThoracoAbdominal Aortic surgery)

Background

Open surgical repair (OSR) for thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAA) is associated with a high pulmonary and renal morbidity rate. Ischemic preconditioning (IPC) is a mechanism of protection against the deleterious effects of ischemia-reperfusion. To our knowledge IPC has never been tested during OSR for TAA.

Methods

The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of IPC during OSR for TAA with respect to acute kidney injury (AKI) according to KDIGO and pneumonia/prolonged ventilation-time during the first 8 postoperative days. The secondary objectives are to compare both arms with respect to cardiac complications within 48 h, renal and pulmonary complications within 21 days and mortality at 60 days.

To assess the efficacy of IPC with respect to pulmonary and renal morbidity, a cox model for competing risks will be used. Assuming that the event occurs among 36% of the patients when no IPC is performed, the allocation of 55 patients to each arm should allow detecting a hazard ratio of at least 2.75 with a power of 80% when admitting 5% for an error of first kind. This means that 110 patients, enrolled in this multicenter study, may be randomised within 36 months of the first randomization.

Randomization will be performed to allocate patients either to surgery with preconditioning before aortic cross clamping (Arm 1) or to surgery without preconditioning before aortic cross clamping (Arm 2).

Randomization takes place during the intervention after intravenous injection of heparin, or after the start of femoral assistance. The procedure for IPC will be a supra-visceral thoracic aortic cross clamping for 5 min followed by an unclamping period of 5 min. This procedure will be repeated twice before starting thoracic aortic cross clamping needed to perform surgery.

Conclusions

Our hypothesis is that ischemic preconditioning could reduce clinical morbidity and the incidence of lung damage associated with supra-visceral aortic clamping.

Trial registration

EPICATAStudy registered in ClinicalTrial.gov / number: NCT03718312 on Oct.24.2018 URL number

Remote Ischemic Preconditioning Prevents Postoperative Acute Kidney Injury After Open Total Aortic Arch Replacement: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Sham-Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Acute kidney injury is a common complication after open total aortic arch replacement but lacks effective preventive strategies. Remote ischemic preconditioning has controversial results of its benefit to the kidney and may perform better in high-risk patients of acute kidney injury. We investigated whether remote ischemic preconditioning would prevent postoperative acute kidney injury after open total aortic arch replacement.

METHODS

We enrolled 130 patients scheduled for open total aortic arch replacement and randomized them to receive either remote ischemic preconditioning (4 cycles of 5-minute right upper limb ischemia and 5-minute reperfusion) or sham preconditioning (4 cycles of 5-minute right upper limb pseudo ischemia and 5-minute reperfusion), both via blood pressure cuff inflation and deflation. The primary end point was the incidence of acute kidney injury within 7 days after the surgery defined by the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes criteria. Secondary end point included short-term clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

Significantly fewer patients developed postoperative acute kidney injury with remote ischemic preconditioning compared with sham (55.4% vs 73.8%; absolute risk reduction, 18.5%; 95% CI, 2.3%-34.6%; P = .028). Remote ischemic preconditioning significantly reduced acute kidney injury stage II-III (10.8% vs 35.4%; P = .001). Remote ischemic preconditioning shortened the mechanical ventilation duration (18 hours [interquartile range, 14-33] versus 25 hours [interquartile range, 17-48]; P = .01), whereas no significant differences were observed between groups in other secondary outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Remote ischemic preconditioning prevented acute kidney injury after open total aortic arch replacement, especially severe acute kidney injury and shortened mechanical ventilation duration. The observed renoprotective effects of remote ischemic preconditioning require further investigation in both clinical research and the underlying mechanism.

The effect of remote ischaemic preconditioning on myocardial injury in emergency hip fracture surgery (PIXIE trial): phase II randomised clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether remote ischaemic preconditioning (RIPC) prevents myocardial injury in patients undergoing hip fracture surgery.

DESIGN

Phase II, multicentre, randomised, observer blinded, clinical trial.

SETTING

Three Danish university hospitals, 2015-17.

PARTICIPANTS

648 patients with cardiovascular risk factors undergoing hip fracture surgery. 286 patients were assigned to RIPC and 287 were assigned to standard practice (control group).

INTERVENTION

The RIPC procedure was initiated before surgery with a tourniquet applied to the upper arm and consisted of four cycles of forearm ischaemia for five minutes followed by reperfusion for five minutes.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The original primary outcome was myocardial injury within four days of surgery, defined as a peak plasma cardiac troponin I concentration of 45 ng/L or more caused by ischaemia. The revised primary outcome was myocardial injury within four days of surgery, defined as a peak plasma cardiac troponin I concentration of 45 ng/L or more or high sensitive troponin I greater than 24 ng/L (the primary outcome was changed owing to availability of testing). Secondary outcomes were peak plasma troponin I and total troponin I release during the first four days after surgery (cardiac and high sensitive troponin I), perioperative myocardial infarction, major adverse cardiovascular events, and all cause mortality within 30 days of surgery, length of postoperative stay, and length of stay in the intensive care unit. Several planned secondary outcomes will be reported elsewhere.

RESULTS

573 of the 648 randomised patients were included in the intention-to-treat analysis (mean age 79 (SD 10) years; 399 (70%) women). The primary outcome occurred in 25 of 168 (15%) patients in the RIPC group and 45 of 158 (28%) in the control group (odds ratio 0.44, 95% confidence interval 0.25 to 0.76; P=0.003). The revised primary outcome occurred in 57 of 286 patients (20%) in the RIPC group and 90 of 287 (31%) in the control group (0.55, 0.37 to 0.80; P=0.002). Myocardial infarction occurred in 10 patients (3%) in the RIPC group and 21 patients (7%) in the control group (0.46, 0.21 to 0.99; P=0.04). Statistical power was insufficient to draw firm conclusions on differences between groups for the other clinical secondary outcomes (major adverse cardiovascular events, 30 day all cause mortality, length of postoperative stay, and length of stay in the intensive care unit).

CONCLUSIONS

RIPC reduced the risk of myocardial injury and infarction after emergency hip fracture surgery. It cannot be concluded that RIPC overall prevents major adverse cardiovascular events after surgery. The findings support larger scale clinical trials to assess longer term clinical outcomes and mortality.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02344797.

Neuro-autonomic changes induced by remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) in healthy young adults: Implications for stress

The mechanisms underlying the protective effects of remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) are not presently clear. Recent studies in experimental models suggest the involvement of the autonomic nervous system (ANS) in cardioprotection. The aim of this study was to investigate the changes in ANS in healthy young volunteers divided into RIPC (n = 22) or SHAM (n = 18) groups. RIPC was induced by 1 cycle of 4 min inflation/5 min deflation followed by 2 cycles of 5 min inflation/5 min deflation of a cuff placed on the upper left limb. The study included analysis of heart rate (HR), blood pressure (BP), heart rate variability (HRV), measurements of microcirculation and porphyrin fluorescence in the limb before and after the RIPC. RIPC caused reactive hyperemia in the limb and reduced blood porphyrin level. A mental load (serial sevens test) and mild motor stress (hyperventilation) were performed on all subjects before and after RIPC or corresponding rest in the SHAM group. Reduction of HR occurred during the experiments in both RIPC and SHAM groups reflecting RIPC-independent adaptation of the subjects to the experimental procedure. However, in contrast to the SHAM group, RIPC altered several of the spectral indices of HRV during the serial sevens test and hyperventilation. This was expressed predominantly as an increase in power of the very low-frequency band of the spectrum, increased values of detrended fluctuation analysis and weakening of correlation between the HRV parameters and HR. In conclusion, RIPC induces changes in the activity of ANS that are linked to stress resistance.

Remote ischemic conditioning: a promising therapeutic intervention for multi-organ protection

Despite decades of formidable exploration, multi-organ ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) encountered, particularly amongst elderly patients with clinical scenarios, such as age-related arteriosclerotic vascular disease, heart surgery and organ transplantation, is still an unsettled conundrum that besets clinicians. Remote ischemic conditioning (RIC), delivered via transient, repetitive noninvasive IR interventions to distant organs or tissues, is regarded as an innovative approach against IRI. Based on the available evidence, RIC holds the potential of affording protection to multiple organs or tissues, which include not only the heart and brain, but also others that are likely susceptible to IRI, such as the kidney, lung, liver and skin. Neuronal and humoral signaling pathways appear to play requisite roles in the mechanisms of RIC-related beneficial effects, and these pathways also display inseparable interactions with each other. So far, several hurdles lying ahead of clinical translation that remain to be settled, such as establishment of biomarkers, modification of RIC regimen, and deep understanding of underlying minutiae through which RIC exerts its powerful function. As this approach has garnered an increasing interest, herein, we aim to encapsulate an overview of the basic concept and postulated protective mechanisms of RIC, highlight the main findings from proof-of-concept clinical studies in various clinical scenarios, and also to discuss potential obstacles that remain to be conquered. More well designed and comprehensive experimental work or clinical trials are warranted in future research to confirm whether RIC could be utilized as a non-invasive, inexpensive and efficient adjunct therapeutic intervention method for multi-organ protection.

Effects of Cross-Clamping on Vascular Mechanics: Comparing Waveform Analysis With a Numerical Model

BACKGROUND

Immediate changes in vascular mechanics during aortic cross-clamping remain widely unknown. By using a numerical model of the arterial network, vascular compliance and resistance can be estimated and the time constant of pressure waves can be calculated and compared with results from the classic arterial waveform analysis.

METHODS

Experimental data were registered from continuous invasive radial artery pressure measurements from 11 patients undergoing vascular surgery. A stable set of beats were chosen immediately before and after each clamping event. Through the arterial waveform analysis, the time constant was calculated for each individual beat and for a mean beat of each condition as to compare with numerical simulations. Overall proportional changes in resistance and compliance during clamping and unclamping were calculated using the numerical model.

RESULTS

Arterial waveform analysis of individual beats indicated a significant 10% median reduction in the time constant after clamping, and a significant 17% median increase in the time constant after unclamping. There was a positive correlation between waveform analysis and numerical values of the time constant, which was moderate (ρ = 0.51; P = 0.01486) during clamping and strong (ρ = 0.77; P ≤ 0.0001) during unclamping. After clamping, there was a significant 16% increase in the mean resistance and a significant 23% decrease in the mean compliance. After unclamping, there was a significant 19% decrease in the mean resistance and a significant 56% increase in the mean compliance.

CONCLUSIONS

There are significant hemodynamic changes in vascular compliance and resistance during aortic clamping and unclamping. Numerical computer models can add information on the mechanisms of injury due to aortic clamping.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of remote ischemic preconditioning for vascular surgery

BACKGROUND

Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) is a method of preparing the body for a later prolonged ischemic episode to protect against subsequent detrimental effects. This study aimed to identify the effects of RIPC in vascular surgery.

METHODS

A standard Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses search was conducted of randomized controlled trials of RIPC in patients undergoing open or endovascular aneurysm repair, carotid endarterectomy, or lower limb bypass reporting on mortality and renal or cardiac outcomes. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.3 (The Nordic Cochrane Center, Copenhagen, Denmark).

RESULTS

A total of 13 randomized controlled trials in the meta-analysis included 548 patients in the RIPC cohort and 549 controls. There was no significant difference in mortality, renal dysfunction, myocardial infarction, myocardial injury, or length of stay between the groups, with subgroup and sensitivity analysis showing no significant difference.

CONCLUSIONS

Current evidence demonstrates no benefit of RIPC in vascular surgery. Further large multicenter trials of RIPC in major vascular surgery should be considered.

Effect of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning on Patients Undergoing Elective Major Vascular Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Whether remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC), through several cycles of ischemia-reperfusion, can generate endogenous protective substances to protect patients undergoing elective major vascular surgery remains unclear. The results derived from many randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have been discrepant.

METHODS

PubMed (1966 to May 2018) and EMBASE (1966 to May 2018) databases were searched to identify all published RCTs that assessed the effect of RIPC in patients undergoing elective major vascular surgery. Then, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to merge the outcomes of RIPC procedures from each RCT, which included all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), acute kidney injury (AKI), and/or new-onset arrhythmia.

RESULTS

A total of 909 patients were enrolled from 10 eligible studies that were conducted from 2007 through 2016. A fixed effect model was utilized in this study to pool each effect size. Pooled analyses of all RCTs showed that RIPC did not reduce the incidence of all-cause mortality (pooled risk ratio [RR] 1.36, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.63-2.92, P = 0.56), MI (pooled RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.48-1.22, P = 0.38), AKI (pooled RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.68-1.27, P = 0.10), or new-onset arrhythmia (pooled RR 1.47, 95% CI 0.83-2.60, P = 0.52) compared with the control treatment. The publication bias detected by Begg's test was low.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no prominent evidence to support the hypothesis that RIPC can provide perioperative protection to patients undergoing elective major vascular surgery. Therefore, the routine use of RIPC to reduce the incidence of perioperative complications of these operations may not be recommended.

Intestinal and Limb Ischemic Preconditioning Provides a Combined Protective Effect in the Late Phase, But not in the Early Phase, Against Intestinal Injury Induced by Intestinal Ischemia-Reperfusion in Rats

Intestinal ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury is associated with high morbidity and mortality. This study aimed to compare the protective efficacy of intestinal ischemic preconditioning (IIPC) and limb ischemic preconditioning (LIPC) against intestinal I/R injury and investigate their combined protective effect and the underlying mechanism. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were pretreated with IIPC, LIPC, or IIPC plus LIPC (combined), and intestinal I/R or sham operation was performed. The animals were sacrificed at 2 and 24 h after reperfusion and then blood and tissue samples were harvested for further analyses. In additional groups of animals, a 7-day survival study was conducted. The results showed that ischemic preconditioning (IPC) improved the survival rate and attenuated intestinal edema, injury, and apoptosis. IPC decreased the levels of tumor necrosis factor-α, interleukin -6, malondialdehyde and myeloperoxidase, and increased the activity of superoxide dismutase in serum and intestine after the I/R event. IPC downregulated the expression of Toll-like receptor-4 (TLR4) and nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB). The effect of combined pretreatment was better than that of single pretreatment in the late phase (24 h), but not in the early phase (2 h). The study demonstrated that IPC could significantly attenuate intestinal injury induced by intestinal I/R via inhibiting inflammation, oxidative stress, and apoptosis. IIPC and LIPC conferred no synergy in protecting I/R-induced intestinal injury in the early phase, but combined preconditioning had clearly stronger protection in the late phase, which was associated with the inhibition of the activated TLR4/NF-κB signaling pathway. It suggested that LIPC or combined preconditioning could potentially be applied in the clinical settings of surgical patient care.

The Effect of Remote Ischaemic Preconditioning on Arterial Stiffness in Patients Undergoing Vascular Surgery: A Randomised Clinical Trial

OBJECTIVES

The main aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of remote ischaemic preconditioning (RIPC) on arterial stiffness in patients undergoing vascular surgery.

METHODS

This was a randomised, sham controlled, double blind, single centre study. Patients undergoing open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, surgical lower limb revascularisation surgery or carotid endarterectomy were recruited. A RIPC or a sham procedure was performed, using a blood pressure cuff, along with preparation for anaesthesia. The RIPC protocol consisting of four cycles of 5 min of ischaemia, followed by 5 min of reperfusion was applied. Arterial stiffness and haemodynamic parameters were measured pre-operatively and 20-28 h after surgery. Two primary outcomes were selected: augmentation index and pulse wave velocity.

RESULTS

Ninety-eight patients were randomised. After dropouts 44 and 46 patients were included in the RIPC and sham groups, respectively. Both groups were comparable. There were no statistically significant differences in augmentation index (p = .8), augmentation index corrected for heart rate of 75 beats per minute (p = .8), pulse wave velocity (p = .7), large artery elasticity indices (p = .8), small artery elasticity indices (p = .6), or mean arterial pressure (p = .7) changes between the RIPC and sham groups. There occurred statistically significant (p ≤ .01) improvement in augmentation index (-5.8% vs. -5.5%), augmentation index corrected for a heart rate of 75 beats per minute (-2.5% vs. -2%), small artery elasticity indices (0.7 mL/mmHg × 100 vs. 0.9 mL/mmHg × 100), and mean arterial pressure post-operatively in both the RIPC and the sham groups (change median values in RIPC and sham groups, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

RIPC had no significant effect on arterial stiffness, but there was significant improvement in arterial stiffness after surgery in both groups. Arterial stiffness and haemodynamics may be influenced by surgery or anaesthesia or oxidative stress or all factors combined. Further studies are needed to clarify these findings. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV: NCT02689414.

Effect of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning on Complications After Elective Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair: A Meta-Analysis With Randomized Control Trials

OBJECTIVE

This meta-analysis was to evaluate the effect of remote ischemic preconditioning (RIP) on complications after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted in Google scholar, PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases up to February 2019. The pooled risk difference (RD) as well as their 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated by RevMan 5.3 software.

RESULTS

A total of 249 patients receiving abdominal aortic aneurysm repair with RIP and 248 receiving abdominal aortic aneurysm repair without RIP in 7 included studies were reanalyzed in this meta-analysis. The results showed that RIP cannot significantly reduce the postoperative mortality (RD = -0.01, 95% CI: -0.07 to 0.06, P = .87), myocardial infarction (RD = -0.01, 95% CI, -0.09 to 0.07, P = .79), and renal impairment (RD = 0.06, 95% CI: -0.41 to 0.30, P = .89) and renal failure (RD = 0.04, 95% CI: -0.03 to 0.10, P = .30). Moreover, the pooled estimate indicated that the RIP significantly increased the risk of arrhythmia after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair surgery (RD = 0.08, 95% CI: 0.01 to -0.16, P = .03). Nevertheless, sensitivity analyses indicated unreliable results for risk of arrhythmia.

CONCLUSION

There is no evidence that RIP reduces mortality after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Moreover, the current evidence is not robust enough to prove the effect of RIP on kidney- and cardiac-related complications.

Effect of Combined Treatment of Ketorolac and Remote Ischemic Preconditioning on Renal Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in Patients Undergoing Partial Nephrectomy: Pilot Study

We evaluated postoperative renal function in patients with/without combined therapy of ketorolac and remote ischemic preconditioning during partial nephrectomy. Sixteen patients were randomly allocated to either the ketorolac combined with RIPC group (KI, n = 8) or control group (n = 8). The KI group received both remote ischemic preconditioning before surgery and intravenous ketorolac of 1 mg/kg before renal artery clamping. Renal parameters were measured before induction, after anesthesia induction, and 2, 12, 24, 48, and 72 h after renal artery declamping. Acute kidney injury was assessed by Acute Kidney Injury Network criteria. The estimated glomerular filtration rate decreased in both groups, but then increased significantly at 48 h and 72 h after declamping only in the KI group compared to 24 h (p = 0.001 and p = 0.016). Additionally, it was higher at 48 h and 72 h after declamping in the KI group compared to the control group (p = 0.025 and p = 0.044). The incidence of acute kidney injury was significantly reduced in the KI group (13%) compared to the control group (83%) (p = 0.026). FE_Na was markedly increased at 2 h after declamping, and recovered in both groups, but it was more significant at 12 h after declamping in the KI group (p = 0.022). Urinary N-acetyl-1-β-D-glucosoaminidase and serum neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin were similar (p = 0.291 and p = 0.818). There is a possibility that combined therapy of ketorolac and remote ischemic preconditioning prior to ischemia may alleviate renal dysfunction and reduce the incidence of acute kidney injury in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy.

Effects of Ischemic Preconditioning on Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Ischemic preconditioning is an innate mechanism of cytoprotection against ischemia, with potential for end-organ protection. The primary goal of this study was to systematically review the literature to determine the effect of ischemic preconditioning on outcomes after open and endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair.

METHODS

The methodology followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. We included randomized clinical trials that evaluated the effect of remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) in reducing morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing open or endovascular AAA repair surgery. The primary outcomes were death, myocardial infarction, and renal impairment. Outcomes were addressed separately for open AAA repair and endovascular AAA repair (EVAR). Data were collected on patient characteristics, methodology, and preconditioning protocol for each trial.

RESULTS

Nine trials of ischemic preconditioning in aortic aneurysm surgery were included with a total of 599 patients; 336 patients were included in the open AAA repair meta-analysis, and 263 patients were included in the EVAR meta-analysis. For both open and endovascular repairs, ischemic preconditioning did not have a significant effect on death, myocardial infarction, or renal impairment requiring dialysis.

CONCLUSIONS

The randomized clinical trials investigating the effect of ischemic preconditioning on outcomes after open and endovascular AAA repair that have been completed to date have not been adequately powered to evaluate improvements in patient-important outcomes. The evidence is insufficient to support the use of ischemic preconditioning for AAA repair in clinical practice. The variability in treatment effect across studies may be explained by clinical and methodological heterogeneity.

Embelin inhibits abdominal aortic aneurysm through decreasing IL‑6‑induced STAT3 and NF‑κB inactivation

The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of embelin on abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). AAA model mice were induced by chronic infusion of 1,000 ng/kg/min Angiotensin II. AAA model mice were treated with 25, 50 or 100 mg/kg embelin for 28 days. Embelin inhibited tumor necrosis factor‑α, interleukin (IL)‑1β, IL‑6, IL‑18 and malondialdehyde (MDA) level activities, increased superoxide dismutase, glutathione (GSH) and GSH peroxidase level activities and inhibited MDA level activities in AAA mice Embelin suppressed the secretion of matrix metalloproteinase‑9 protein expression, monocyte chemoattractant protein‑2 activity and epithelial neutrophil‑activating peptide expression levels in AAA mice. Embelin suppressed phosphorylated‑signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) 3, phosphorylated‑p38 mitogen‑activated protein kinase and nuclear factor (NF)‑κB protein expression in AAA mice. These findings indicate that embelin inhibits AAA through decreasing IL‑6‑induced STAT3, and NF‑κB inactivation.

Effects of the gut-liver axis on ischaemia-mediated hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence in the mouse liver

BACKGROUND & AIMS

There is growing evidence that liver graft ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) is a risk factor for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence, but the mechanisms involved are unclear. Herein, we tested the hypothesis that mesenteric congestion resulting from portal blood flow interruption induces endotoxin-mediated Toll-like receptor 4 (Tlr4) engagement, resulting in elevated liver cancer burden. We also assessed the role of remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) in this context.

METHODS

C57Bl/6j mice were exposed to standardized models of liver I/R injury and RIPC, induced by occluding the hepatic and femoral blood vessels. HCC was induced by injecting RIL-175 cells into the portal vein. We further evaluated the impact of the gut-liver axis (lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-Tlr4 pathway) in this context by studying mice with enhanced (lipopolysaccharide infusion) or defective (Tlr4^-/- mice, gut sterilization, and Tlr4 antagonist) Tlr4 responses.

RESULTS

Portal triad clamping provoked upstream mesenteric venous engorgement and increased bacterial translocation, resulting in aggravated tumor burden. RIPC prevented this mechanism by preserving intestinal integrity and reducing bacterial translocation, thereby mitigating HCC recurrence. These observations were linked to the LPS-Tlr4 pathway, as supported by the high and low tumor burden displayed by mice with enhanced or defective Tlr4 responses, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Modulation of the gut-liver axis and the LPS-Tlr4 response by RIPC, gut sterilization, and Tlr4 antagonism represents a potential therapeutic target to prevent I/R lesions, and to alleviate HCC recurrence after liver transplantation and resection.

LAY SUMMARY

Cancer recurrence can occur after liver resection or liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study suggests that intestinal venous congestion, which often occurs during liver surgery, favors the translocation of gut-derived bacterial products in the portal vein, thereby facilitating cancer recurrence by enhancing the signaling of Toll-like receptor 4 in the liver. Using a mouse model of HCC recurrence, we show that strategies that (i) reduce bacterial translocation (by gut decontamination, or by protecting the intestine from venous ischemia damage) or (ii) inhibit Tlr4 signaling in the liver, could reduce cancer recurrence.

Randomized clinical trial of remote ischaemic preconditioning versus no preconditioning in the prevention of perioperative myocardial infarction during open surgery for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm

Background

Remote ischaemic preconditioning (RIPC) has been suggested as a means of protecting vital organs from reperfusion injury during major vascular surgery. This study was designed to determine whether RIPC could reduce the incidence of perioperative myocardial infarction (MI) during open surgery for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Secondary aims were to see if RIPC could reduce 30-day mortality, multiple organ failure, acute intestinal ischaemia, acute kidney injury and ischaemic stroke.

Methods

This randomized, non-blinded clinical trial was undertaken at three vascular surgery centres in Denmark. Patients who had open surgery for ruptured AAA were randomized to intervention with RIPC or control in a 1 : 1 ratio. Postoperative complications and deaths were registered, and ECG and blood samples were obtained daily during the hospital stay.

Results

Of 200 patients randomized, 142 (72 RIPC, 70 controls) were included. There was no difference in rates of perioperative MI between the RIPC and control groups (36 versus 43 per cent respectively), or in rates of organ failure. However, in the per-protocol analysis 30-day mortality was significantly reduced in the RIPC group (odds ratio 0·46, 95 per cent c.i. 0·22 to 0·99; P = 0·048).

Conclusion

RIPC did not reduce the incidence of perioperative MI in patients undergoing open surgery for ruptured AAA. Registration number: NCT00883363 ( http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).

Clinical translation of myocardial conditioning

Rapid admission and acute interventional treatment combined with modern antithrombotic pharmacologic therapy have improved outcomes in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction. The next major target to further advance outcomes needs to address ischemia-reperfusion injury, which may contribute significantly to the final infarct size and hence mortality and postinfarction heart failure. Mechanical conditioning strategies including local and remote ischemic pre-, per-, and postconditioning have demonstrated consistent cardioprotective capacities in experimental models of acute ischemia-reperfusion injury. Their translation to the clinical scenario has been challenging. At present, the most promising mechanical protection strategy of the heart seems to be remote ischemic conditioning, which increases myocardial salvage beyond acute reperfusion therapy. An additional aspect that has gained recent focus is the potential of extended conditioning strategies to improve physical rehabilitation not only after an acute ischemia-reperfusion event such as acute myocardial infarction and cardiac surgery but also in patients with heart failure. Experimental and preliminary clinical evidence suggests that remote ischemic conditioning may modify cardiac remodeling and additionally enhance skeletal muscle strength therapy to prevent muscle waste, known as an inherent component of a postoperative period and in heart failure. Blood flow restriction exercise and enhanced external counterpulsation may represent cardioprotective corollaries. Combined with exercise, remote ischemic conditioning or, alternatively, blood flow restriction exercise may be of aid in optimizing physical rehabilitation in populations that are not able to perform exercise practice at intensity levels required to promote optimal outcomes.