ACOG Committee Opinion No. 752: Prenatal and Perinatal Human Immunodeficiency Virus Testing

False-Positive Human Immunodeficiency Virus-1 Test Results With Rapid Seroreversion After Third-Trimester Tdap Booster Vaccination

BACKGROUND

False-positive and false-negative results in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) testing are expected at some frequency. False-positive results have been reported in association with various conditions, including pregnancy, autoimmune disease, and infection. We present an atypical case of a pregnant patient receiving false-positive HIV results for both screening and antibody confirmatory tests after a recent routine vaccination.

CASE

A 34-year-old woman, G4P1021, with a negative first-trimester HIV test result received a tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) booster at 35 2/7 weeks of gestation. Test results at 36 2/7 weeks of gestation were positive in both HIV-1/2 antigen-antibody screening and a confirmatory HIV-1 antibody differentiation immunoassay, but follow-up test results at 36 5/7 weeks and later were negative. Repeat testing and erythrocyte typing confirmed that this was not a result of laboratory error or specimen mishandling. HIV antiretroviral therapy was started and was later discontinued. A scheduled primary cesarean delivery performed at 39 1/7 weeks of gestation due to breech presentation was uncomplicated.

CONCLUSIONS

False-positive results in HIV screen and confirmation testing were associated with receipt of a Tdap vaccine booster 7 days prior. This test result pattern is similar to that seen very rarely in previous cases, and the rapid seroreversion to negative suggests an acute immunologic trigger leading to a falsely reactive antibody. Clinicians should be aware of the potential for false-positive HIV test results in patients who recently received vaccination or with other immune triggers and retest at a short interval if suspected.

Considering screening for hereditary cancer syndromes at the time of obstetrical prenatal carrier screening

Preconception and pregnancy represent a unique window of opportunity for women to engage with the health care system. This article explores the possibility of offering testing for cancer‐associated pathogenic variants on obstetrical carrier screening panels.

Clinical Trials That Have Changed Clinical Practice and Care of Pregnant People With HIV

Over the last 4 decades, significant advances in the care of HIV during pregnancy have successfully reduced, and nearly eliminated, the risk of perinatal HIV transmission. The baseline risk of transmission without intervention (25% to 30%) is now <1% to 2% in the United States with contemporary antepartum, intrapartum, and postnatal interventions. In this review, we discuss 3 landmark clinical trials that substantially altered obstetric practice for pregnant individuals with HIV and contributed to this extraordinary achievement: 1) the Pediatric AIDS Clinical Trials Group 076 Trial determined that antepartum and intrapartum administration of antiretroviral drug zidovudine to the pregnant individual, and postnatally to the newborn, could reduce the risk of perinatal transmission by approximately two-thirds; 2) the European Mode of Delivery Collaboration Trial demonstrated performance of a prelabor cesarean birth before rupture of membranes among pregnant people with viremia reduced the risk of perinatal transmission compared with vaginal birth; and 3) the International Maternal Pediatric Adolescent AIDS Clinical Trials Network 2010 Trial identified that dolutegravir-containing, compared with efavirenz-containing, antiretroviral regimens during pregnancy achieved a significantly higher rate of viral suppression at delivery with shorter time to viral suppression, with fewer adverse pregnancy outcomes. Collectively, these trials not only advanced obstetric practice but also advanced scientific understanding of the timing, mechanisms, and determinants of perinatal HIV transmission. For each trial, we will describe key aspects of the study protocol and outcomes, insights gleaned about the dynamics of perinatal transmission, how each study changed clinical practice, and relevant updates to current practice since the trial's publication.

Statewide Implementation of Universal Third-Trimester Repeat HIV Testing in Illinois

OBJECTIVE

This article aims to assess statewide uptake of HIV repeat testing in the first 2 years after the implementation of an amendment to the Illinois Perinatal HIV Prevention Act (IPHPA) mandating universal repeat HIV testing in the third trimester.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a retrospective, population-based study of all birthing individuals in Illinois (2018-2019). Data were collected using the state-mandated closed system of perinatal HIV test reporting. We evaluated the incidence of mother-infant pairs with negative early tests and repeat third-trimester tests (RTTTs) performed in adherence with the law, as well as the timing of the performance of the RTTTs (outpatient vs. inpatient). Chi-square tests of trend by quarter were performed to ascertain sustainability.

RESULTS

Of 138,805 individuals delivered in 2018, 80.6% presented with early test and RTTTs. In 2018, outpatient RTTTs improved from 71.8% (quarter 1) to 85.1% (quarter 4; p < 0.001). In 2018, the proportion of mother-infant dyads who received testing that was adherent to the IPHPA Amendment was 92.1, 95.5, 96.7, and 96.4% in quarters 1 through 4, respectively (p < 0.001). In 2019, outpatient RTTTs performance remained high (87.4%) and stable (p = 0.06). In 2019, 99.9% of mother-infant dyads had testing adherent to the mandate in quarters 1 through 4 (p = 0.39). Of individuals who presented without RTTTs, 93.5% (2018) and 98.8% (2019) underwent inpatient testing before delivery.

CONCLUSION

Implementation of RTTTs in Illinois was rapid, successful, and sustained in its first 2 years. Public health methodologies from Illinois may benefit other states implementing RTTT programs.

KEY POINTS

· In 2018, Illinois enacted statewide RTTT for HIV among all parturients.. · In 2019, over 99% of mother-infant dyads had documentation of both early and repeat HIV testing before hospital discharge.. · Implementation of repeat third-trimester HIV testing in Illinois was rapid, successful, and sustained in its first 2 years.. · Public health methodologies from Illinois may benefit other states implementing similar programs..

Evaluation of State-Mandated Third Trimester Repeat HIV Testing in a Large Tertiary Care Center

OBJECTIVE

The Illinois Perinatal HIV Prevention Act was passed to ensure universal HIV testing once during pregnancy and was extended in 2018 to add third trimester repeat HIV screening. The objectives of this analysis were to describe uptake of, and patient factors associated with, third trimester repeat HIV testing at a high-volume birthing center.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a retrospective cohort study of people who delivered at a single tertiary care hospital in Illinois during 2018. Women who delivered before 27 weeks, had an intrauterine fetal demise, a known diagnosis of HIV, or no HIV test during pregnancy were excluded. Repeat testing was defined as an HIV test at or after 27 weeks' gestation after an earlier negative HIV test during the same pregnancy. The primary outcome was the proportion of people who received repeat testing prior to delivery. Bivariable analyses were performed to identify patient characteristics associated with documentation of repeat HIV testing.

RESULTS

Of 12,053 people eligible for inclusion, 3.4% (n = 414) presented without a documented third trimester repeat HIV test. The proportion of people with repeat testing improved from 80 to >99% in the first year. Patient factors were largely not associated with testing performance although multiparous people were more likely to have documented repeat testing.

CONCLUSION

Rapid implementation of third trimester repeat HIV testing was achieved without disparity. Patient factors were largely not associated with testing performance which reinforces the goal of a universal screen to test all people equitably and effectively without bias.

KEY POINTS

· Little is known about adherence to repeat third trimester HIV testing in pregnancy.. · Universal third trimester HIV screening was implemented with high uptake and without disparity.. · Protocolization of repeat HIV testing in pregnancy may reduce bias compared to risk based-screening..

False-Positive Human Immunodeficiency Virus Screening Results in Pregnancy During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic

False-positive human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) test results are rare but have been documented in the setting of certain underlying conditions such as Epstein-Barr virus, metastatic cancer, and certain autoimmune conditions. A retrospective cohort study in a large hospital system was conducted to compare the occurrence of false-positive HIV fourth-generation test results before and after the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in a population of pregnant patients (N=44,187; 22,073 pre-COVID and 22,114 during COVID). The COVID cohort had a significantly higher frequency of false-positive HIV test results compared with the pre-COVID cohort (0.381 vs 0.676, P=.002). Within the COVID cohort, 25% of patients had a positive polymerase chain reaction test result for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) preceding their false-positive HIV test results. When this subgroup was excluded, the difference in frequency of false-positive HIV test results between the cohorts was no longer significant (0.381 vs 0.507, P=.348). Our findings suggest that SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity was associated with an increased frequency of false-positive HIV test results in the pregnant population.

Development of a predictive model for identifying women vulnerable to HIV in Chicago

INTRODUCTION

Researchers in the United States have created several models to predict persons most at risk for HIV. Many of these predictive models use data from all persons newly diagnosed with HIV, the majority of whom are men, and specifically men who have sex with men (MSM). Consequently, risk factors identified by these models are biased toward features that apply only to men or capture sexual behaviours of MSM. We sought to create a predictive model for women using cohort data from two major hospitals in Chicago with large opt-out HIV screening programs.

METHODS

We matched 48 newly diagnosed women to 192 HIV-negative women based on number of previous encounters at University of Chicago or Rush University hospitals. We examined data for each woman for the two years prior to either their HIV diagnosis or their last encounter. We assessed risk factors including demographic characteristics and clinical diagnoses taken from patient electronic medical records (EMR) using odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals. We created a multivariable logistic regression model and measured predictive power with the area under the curve (AUC). In the multivariable model, age group, race, and ethnicity were included a priori due to increased risk for HIV among specific demographic groups.

RESULTS

The following clinical diagnoses were significant at the bivariate level and were included in the model: pregnancy (OR 1.96 (1.00, 3.84)), hepatitis C (OR 5.73 (1.24, 26.51)), substance use (OR 3.12 (1.12, 8.65)) and sexually transmitted infections (STIs) chlamydia, gonorrhoea, or syphilis. We also a priori included demographic factors that are associated with HIV. Our final model had an AUC of 0.74 and included healthcare site, age group, race, ethnicity, pregnancy, hepatitis C, substance use, and STI diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Our predictive model showed acceptable discrimination between those who were and were not newly diagnosed with HIV. We identified risk factors such as recent pregnancy, recent hepatitis C diagnosis, and substance use in addition to the traditionally used recent STI diagnosis that can be incorporated by health systems to detect women who are vulnerable to HIV and would benefit from preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP).

Universal Repeat Screening for Human Immunodeficiency Virus in the Third Trimester of Pregnancy: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To assess the cost effectiveness of universal repeat screening for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection in the third trimester of pregnancy.

METHODS

A decision-analytic model was constructed to compare two strategies: screening for HIV infection in the first trimester alone compared with the addition of repeat screening in the third trimester. Probabilities, costs, and utilities were derived from the literature and varied in sensitivity analyses. The assumed incidence of HIV infection in pregnancy was 0.0145% or 14.5 per 100,000. Outcomes included costs (in 2022 U.S. dollars), maternal and neonatal quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and cases of neonatal HIV infection. Our theoretical cohort contained 3.8 million pregnant individuals, the approximate number of births per year in the United States. The willingness-to-pay threshold was set at $100,000/QALY. We performed univariable and multivariable sensitivity analyses to determine inputs that most influenced the model.

RESULTS

Universal third-trimester screening prevented 133 cases of neonatal HIV infection in this theoretical cohort. Universal third-trimester screening led to an increased cost of $17.54 million and 2,732 increased QALYs, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $6,418.56 per QALY, less than the willingness-to-pay threshold. In a univariate sensitivity analysis, third-trimester screening remained cost effective with variation of HIV incidence in pregnancy to as low as 0.0052%.

CONCLUSION

In a theoretical U.S.-based cohort of pregnant individuals, universal repeat screening for HIV infection in the third trimester was found to be cost effective and to reduce vertical transmission of HIV. These results merit consideration of a broader HIV-screening program in the third trimester.

Evaluating adherence to American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists guidelines at the first obstetric visit

Objective:

This is a prospective observational cohort study with the objective of assessing adherence to the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists guidelines regarding the first prenatal visit and determining what patient and provider factors are associated with high adherence in a faculty obstetric clinic at an academic medical center.

Methods:

The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists guidelines recommend addressing 72 topics early in prenatal care. A research assistant observed the first prenatal encounter and noted which topics were discussed during the visit. Patient and clinic characteristics were also collected. The primary outcome was the percentage of topics covered at each visit. After analyzing all encounters, patient encounters that scored above the median score were compared with encounters scoring below the median using bivariate comparisons with respect to patient and clinic characteristics. A multivariable Poisson regression model with robust error variance was performed on characteristics with a p value of ⩽0.2.

Results:

Fifty-one patient encounters met inclusion criteria and the median score for topics covered was 74%. Patients with chronic disease were more likely to have a higher percentage of topics covered (odds ratio 1.67, 95% confidence interval: 0.91–3.09). Patients who completed a prenatal questionnaire were also more likely to have a higher percentage (odds ratio 2.28, 95% confidence interval: 1.00–5.15) as well as patients who had nurse-led education integrated into their visit during (odds ratio 1.82, 95% confidence interval: 1.19–2.78). Patient satisfaction had no correlation with the number of topics covered.

Conclusion:

The number of topics to cover at the first prenatal visit has expanded creating challenges for patients and providers. Integration of prenatal questionnaires and nurse-led education has the potential to address gaps in antenatal care.

Every Mother and Every Fetus Matters: A Positive Pregnant Test = Multiple Offerings of Reproductive Risk Screening for personal, family, and specific obstetrical-fetal conditions

Structured OBJECTIVE: The requirement and need for a focused 'pregnant person -centered' antenatal care process with time for informed consent and shared decision making are important for optimal antenatal care. This commentary focuses on the evidenced -based screening test options and timing as part of the overall 'pregnant person-centered' preconception and antenatal care journey.

METHODS

A structured quality improvement (QI) review (Squire 2.0) was undertaken to examine the appropriate reproductive screening process in the periods of preconception and during pregnancy.

RESULTS

First, evaluated the broader antenatal care structure which, second, enabled the directed reproductive risk screening processes to be offered within an informed consent process. Four international pre-conception and antenatal evidenced-based consensus would routinely offer specific gestational age reproductive risk screening elements: totaling 21 screening elements (preconception 3; 1st trimester 9; 2nd trimester 3; 3rd trimester 4; intrapartum 1; postpartum 1).

CONCLUSION

The best evidenced-based opportunity for comprehensive and collaborative antenatal care with appropriate screening elements requires: single national access healthcare system; expert evidenced-based guideline creation; collaborative maternity care providers based for risk assessment, triage, and management; pregnant person (women) centered care model of maternity care; clearly identified evidenced-based gestational age directed screening elements; international pre-conception and antenatal guideline consensus.

The Use of Integrase Strand Transfer Inhibitors to Treat HIV in Pregnancy

For pregnant women with HIV, antiretroviral therapy (ART) plays a key role in prevention of perinatal transmission. Newer antiretroviral regimens now contain integrase strand transfer inhibitors, which have been found to rapidly suppress HIV viral load in nonpregnant women; however, there are limited data for use in pregnancy. Here, we present the case of a pregnant woman with well-controlled HIV on a well-tolerated prepregnancy regimen of bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide. As there are limited safety data on bictegravir in pregnancy, this ART regimen was changed to a preferred regimen for pregnancy. In the second trimester, because of adverse effects from the new ART regimen and after a risk-benefit discussion, the patient restarted the original regimen. She was able to maintain viral suppression until giving birth.

Human immunodeficiency virus and infertility treatment: an Ethics Committee opinion

Human Immunodeficiency Virus is a serious but manageable chronic disease that affects persons of reproductive age, many of whom express a desire for biological parenthood. This document is a revision of the original document of the same name, last published in 2015 (Fertil Steril 2015;104:e1-8).

Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021

These guidelines for the treatment of persons who have or are at risk for sexually transmitted infections (STIs) were updated by CDC after consultation with professionals knowledgeable in the field of STIs who met in Atlanta, Georgia, June 11–14, 2019. The information in this report updates the 2015 guidelines. These guidelines discuss 1) updated recommendations for treatment of Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Chlamydia trachomatis, and Trichomonas vaginalis; 2) addition of metronidazole to the recommended treatment regimen for pelvic inflammatory disease; 3) alternative treatment options for bacterial vaginosis; 4) management of Mycoplasma genitalium; 5) human papillomavirus vaccine recommendations and counseling messages; 6) expanded risk factors for syphilis testing among pregnant women; 7) one-time testing for hepatitis C infection; 8) evaluation of men who have sex with men after sexual assault; and 9) two-step testing for serologic diagnosis of genital herpes simplex virus. Physicians and other health care providers can use these guidelines to assist in prevention and treatment of STIs.

Guideline No. 409: Intrauterine Fetal Diagnostic Testing in Women with Chronic Viral Infections

OBJECTIVE

This revised guideline provides updated information for the care of women with chronic viral infections who require intrauterine fetal diagnostic testing.

TARGET POPULATION

Women with chronic viral infections who are pregnant or planning a pregnancy.

OPTIONS

Non-invasive screening tests for diagnosis: maternal serum placental analytes with or without nuchal translucency, sonography, maternal serum cell-free placental DNA; and intrauterine fetal diagnostic testing: amniocentesis, chorionic villus sampling, cordocentesis.

OUTCOMES

The recommendations in this guideline have the potential to decrease or eliminate morbidity and mortality in women with chronic viral infections and their infants, which is associated with significant health and economic outcomes.

EVIDENCE

Published literature was retrieved through searches of PubMed, guidelines of national societies (Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, other international societies), and the Cochrane Library using appropriate controlled vocabulary (amniocentesis, chorionic villus sampling, cordocentesis, procedure pregnancy loss risk, viral vertical transmission, fetal and neonatal infection) and keywords (maternal infection or exposure, hepatitis B, hepatitis C, human immunodeficiency virus). Results were restricted to systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials or controlled clinical trials (if available), and observational case-control studies or case series from 2012 to 2019 published in English or French. Studies from 1966 to 2002 were previously reviewed in the SOGC guideline No. 123: Amniocentesis and Women with Hepatitis B, Hepatitis C, or Human Immunodeficiency Virus, and those from 2002 to 2012 were previously reviewed in the SOGC guideline No. 309: Prenatal Invasive Procedures in Women With Hepatitis B, Hepatitis C, and/or Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infections. Updated literature searches were completed regularly through August 2019 and were incorporated into this guideline.

VALIDATION METHODS

The authors rated the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. See online Appendix A (Tables A1 for definitions and A2 for interpretations of strong and weak recommendations).

INTENDED AUDIENCE

The intended users are maternity care providers and women with chronic viral infections. This guideline provides information to educate and counsel these women, and to offer them reproductive options. RECOMMENDATIONS (GRADE RATINGS IN PARENTHESES).

Bilateral peripheral facial paralysis during pregnancy: a presentation of acute HIV seroconversion

A G7P5A1 woman in her 40s presented to the emergency department at 37 weeks 3 days' estimated gestational age (EGA) with headache, lip tingling and several days of difficulty speaking. Physical examination demonstrated bilateral facial weakness in a peripheral distribution, as well as decreased corneal reflexes and cervical lymphadenopathy. Routine fourth generation HIV screening had previously been negative at 14 and 28 weeks' EGA. Brain MRI was unremarkable, and lumbar puncture disclosed a low-grade, mononuclear cerebrospinal fluid pleocytosis; the patient was treated supportively. She returned for induction of labour at 39 weeks, at which time HIV infection was unexpectedly diagnosed. While unilateral idiopathic peripheral facial paralysis is associated with the third trimester of pregnancy and the early postpartum period, bilateral facial paralysis is rare and should prompt work-up for an underlying systemic cause, such as HIV infection.

Informed Consent and Shared Decision Making in Obstetrics and Gynecology: ACOG Committee Opinion, Number 819

ABSTRACT

Meeting the ethical obligations of informed consent requires that an obstetrician-gynecologist gives the patient adequate, accurate, and understandable information and requires that the patient has the ability to understand and reason through this information and is free to ask questions and to make an intentional and voluntary choice, which may include refusal of care or treatment. Shared decision making is a patient-centered, individualized approach to the informed consent process that involves discussion of the benefits and risks of available treatment options in the context of a patient's values and priorities. Some informed consent challenges are universal to medicine, whereas other challenges arise more commonly in the practice of obstetrics and gynecology than in other specialty areas. This Committee Opinion focuses on informed consent for adult patients in clinical practice and provides new guidance on the practical application of informed consent through shared decision making. The principles outlined in this Committee Opinion will help support the obstetrician-gynecologist in the patient-centered informed consent process.

Maternal infections: revisiting the need for screening in pregnancy

The decision to implement screening for infections during pregnancy depends upon epidemiological, economic, therapeutic and test performance criteria. It therefore varies with public health priorities from country to country. When screening is implemented, the first trimester has become the best time slot to build individual care pathways in this field. This is most relevant for evaluating the risk of embryonic consequences, planning diagnostic testing, initiating primary or secondary prevention and optimising the accuracy of ultrasound follow-up. This article is a critical appraisal of epidemiological data and current international screening recommendations for infections in pregnancy. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Screening for infections in pregnancy: a critical review of current epidemiological evidence and international guidelines.

Premature Rupture of Membranes with Concurrent Viral Infection

Treatment of viral infections is geared toward ameliorating maternal symptoms and minimizing perinatal transmission. Multidisciplinary teams often are required to manage sequelae due to viral diseases in patients with preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM). although data are scarce regarding the antepartum management of common viruses in PPROM, essential principles may be extrapolated from national guidelines and studies in gravid patients. The well-established risks of prematurity are weighed against the often unclear risks of vertical transmission.

Directive clinique no 409 : Tests diagnostiques fœtaux intra-utérins en cas d'infection virale chronique maternelle

OBJECTIF

La présente directive clinique révisée met à jour les renseignements sur la prestation de soins aux femmes atteintes d'une infection virale chronique devant se soumettre à un test diagnostique fœtal intra-utérin.

POPULATION CIBLE

Femmes atteintes d'une infection virale chronique qui sont enceintes ou prévoient le devenir.

OPTIONS

Tests de dépistage non invasifs à des fins diagnostiques : marqueurs placentaires sériques maternels avec ou sans mesure de la clarté nucale, échographie, ADN fœtal libre circulant dans le sang maternel; et tests diagnostiques fœtaux intra-utérins : amniocentèse, biopsie choriale (choriocentèse), cordocentèse.

ISSUES

Les recommandations de la présente directive clinique pourraient réduire ou éliminer la morbi-mortalité chez les femmes atteintes d'une infection virale chronique et leurs nourrissons, ce qui est associé à d'importantes conséquences sur les plans de la santé et de l'économie. DONNéES PROBANTES: La littérature publiée a été recueillie au moyen de recherches dans les bases de données PubMed et Cochrane Library ainsi que dans les directives cliniques de sociétés médicales nationales et internationales (Société des obstétriciens et gynécologues du Canada, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine et d'autres sociétés internationales) en utilisant un vocabulaire (amniocentesis, chorionic villus sampling, cordocentesis, procedure pregnancy loss risk, viral vertical transmission, fetal and neonatal infection) et des mots clés (maternal infection or exposure, hepatitis B, hepatitis C, human immunodeficiency virus) contrôlés et appropriés. Les résultats retenus se limitent aux revues systématiques, aux essais cliniques randomisés ou aux essais cliniques comparatifs (si disponibles) et aux études cas-témoins observationnelles ou études de série de cas publiées entre 2012 et 2019 en anglais ou en français. Les études publiées entre 1966 et 2002 ont déjà été examinées dans la directive clinique de la SOGC n^o 123, L'amniocentèse chez les femmes infectées par l'hépatite B, l'hépatite C ou le virus de l'immunodéficience humaine; les études publiées entre 2002 et 2012 ont quant à elles été examinées dans la directive clinique de la SOGC n^o 309, Interventions effractives prénatales chez les femmes qui présentent des infections par le virus de l'hépatite B, le virus de l'hépatite C et/ou le virus de l'immunodéficience humaine. De nouvelles recherches ont été effectuées dans la littérature jusqu'en août 2019, puis ont été intégrées à la présente directive clinique. MéTHODES DE VALIDATION: L'auteur a évalué la qualité des données probantes et la solidité des recommandations au moyen du cadre méthodologique GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation). Consulter l'annexe A en ligne (le tableau A1 pour les définitions et le tableau A2 pour les interprétations des recommandations fortes et faibles). PUBLIC VISé: Les utilisateurs prévus sont des fournisseurs de soins de maternité et les femmes atteintes d'une infection virale chronique. Cette directive fournit des renseignements pour renseigner et conseiller ces femmes et leur offrir des options de procréation. RECOMMENDATIONS (GRADE RATINGS IN PARENTHESES).

Verification and Implementation of HIV Antibody Differentiation Testing to Improve Turnaround Time for the HIV Diagnostic Algorithm

BACKGROUND

Relying on reference laboratories for HIV confirmation testing may lead to delays in treatment and can cause stress for patients who have positive HIV screening results.

OBJECTIVE

To internalize HIV-1/HIV-2 antibody differentiation testing within the hospital laboratory.

METHODS

We analytically verified an HIV antibody differentiation immunoassay and subsequently compared result turnaround times (TATs) for HIV antibody differentiation and HIV-1 qualitative RNA in the months before and after the test internalization.

RESULTS

HIV antibody differentiation was successfully verified. TATs for HIV antibody differentiation and HIV-1 RNA significantly improved, from medians of 40.4 hours and 156.5 hours to medians of 17.7 hours and 56.5 hours, respectively, after the internalization. The 90th-percentile turnaround times declined by 72% and 44%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

It is feasible for a hospital laboratory to verify HIV antibody-differentiation testing. Its implementation may considerably improve result TATs for the HIV diagnostic algorithm.

HIV in pregnancy - An update

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is an infection with a global prevalence and currently no cure or vaccine. Women living with HIV who become pregnant or who acquire the virus during pregnancy are at risk of both maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality mainly if the virus is poorly controlled. Furthermore, there is a risk of vertical transmission to the fetus during pregnancy labour and postpartum through breastfeeding.

Appropriate management must be instituted to reduce the consequences of HIV in pregnancy, ideally starting with preconception counselling and planning pregnancies when the viral load is minimum. During pregnancy, an appropriate combined anti-retroviral (cART) medication is mandatory with very close monitoring of the viral load, cluster of differentiation 4 (CD4) cell counts, blood counts, liver and kidney function tests.

Planning delivery should not be different in women on cART and suppressed viral loads. However, special care must be taken to limit vertical transmission in those who present late and in whom viral load is unknown or not controlled at the time of delivery.

Breastfeeding remains a potential source of infection for the baby and is being discouraged in high-income countries for women living with HIV; however, in low-income countries, the recommendation is exclusive breastfeeding. If breastfeeding must happen, it is best when viral load is suppressed, and cART continued until weaning.

Serodiscordant couples present unique problems, and their management should begin with the planning of pregnancy. Emphasis should be on taking steps to prevent HIV transmission to the negative partner and vertical transmission to the new-born.

Evaluation and Management of the Infant Exposed to HIV in the United States

Pediatricians play a crucial role in optimizing the prevention of perinatal transmission of HIV infection. Pediatricians provide antiretroviral prophylaxis to infants born to women with HIV type 1 (HIV) infection during pregnancy and to those whose mother's status was first identified during labor or delivery. Infants whose mothers have an undetermined HIV status should be tested for HIV infection within the boundaries of state laws and receive presumptive HIV therapy if the results are positive. Pediatricians promote avoidance of postnatal HIV transmission by advising mothers with HIV not to breastfeed. Pediatricians test the infant exposed to HIV for determination of HIV infection and monitor possible short- and long-term toxicity from antiretroviral exposure. Finally, pediatricians support families living with HIV by providing counseling to parents or caregivers as an important component of care.

Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Special Statement: Updated checklists for pregnancy management in persons with HIV

Optimal management of HIV-positive pregnant individuals involves many specific interventions made by many healthcare professionals at specific time-points before, during, and after pregnancy. Errors of omission are likely unless those professionals use a cognitive aid such as a checklist as a reminder of critical steps. In this document, SMFM presents updated and expanded checklists to help ensure that all relevant elements are considered for every person with HIV during prepregnancy, antepartum, intrapartum, and postpartum periods. The checklists are intended to be used as tools to facilitate the care of individuals with HIV during all phases of pregnancy care. Their use should improve the safety of HIV-positive patients by ensuring that appropriate treatment is given and relevant information is shared with consultative services. Routine use should also facilitate improved documentation, communication, and continuity of care before, during, and after pregnancy.

Accelerating progress towards the elimination of mother-to-child transmission of HIV: a narrative review

INTRODUCTION

Findings from biomedical, behavioural and implementation studies provide a rich foundation to guide programmatic efforts for the prevention of mother-to-child HIV transmission (PMTCT).

METHODS

We summarized the current evidence base to support policy makers, programme managers, funding agencies and other stakeholders in designing and optimizing PMTCT programmes. We searched the scientific literature for PMTCT interventions in the era of universal antiretroviral therapy for pregnant and breastfeeding women (i.e. 2013 onward). Where evidence was sparse, relevant studies from the general HIV treatment literature or from prior eras of PMTCT programme implementation were also considered. Studies were organized into six categories: HIV prevention services for women, timely access to HIV testing, timely access to ART, programme retention and adherence support, timely engagement in antenatal care and services for infants at highest risk of HIV acquisition. These were mapped to specific missed opportunities identified by the UNAIDS Spectrum model and embedded in UNICEF operational guidance to optimize PMTCT services.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

From May to November 2019, we identified numerous promising, evidence-based strategies that, properly tailored and adopted, could contribute to population reductions in vertical HIV transmission. These spanned the HIV and maternal and child health literature, emphasizing the importance of continued alignment and integration of services. We observed overlap between several intervention domains, suggesting potential for synergies and increased downstream impact. Common themes included integration of facility-based healthcare; decentralization of health services from facilities to communities; and engagement of partners, peers and lay workers for social support. Approaches to ensure early HIV diagnosis and treatment prior to pregnancy would strengthen care across the maternal lifespan and should be promoted in the context of PMTCT.

CONCLUSIONS

A wide range of effective strategies exist to improve PMTCT access, uptake and retention. Programmes should carefully consider, prioritize and plan those that are most appropriate for the local setting and best address existing gaps in PMTCT health services.

Update on Prenatal Laboratory Screening: Joint Commission Required Elements

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, and the American Academy of Pediatrics recommend routine screening for pregnant women for evidence of infection with human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis B and syphilis, and vaginal-rectal colonization with group B Streptococcus For each of these pathogens, there are important opportunities to provide maternal treatment, prevent vertical transmission of the pathogen during the prenatal or intrapartum periods, and/or administer neonatal treatment immediately after birth. Such prevention and/or treatment measures are critical to limiting maternal and neonatal morbidity; however, this is dependent on recognition of maternal disease status. A significant number of women in the United States receive either inadequate prenatal care or inadequate screening for these pathogens. The time of admission to labor and delivery units represents an important opportunity to detect at-risk pregnant women and infants. To optimize both maternal and neonatal health, the Joint Commission issued new guidance effective July 1, 2018, mandating documentation of maternal disease status for these pathogens in the maternal medical record and documentation of positive results in the newborn medical record. Immediate peripartum testing for women with inadequate screening is also required. These measures should allow for timely interventions to improve maternal health and ideally to prevent perinatal disease transmission to the newborn.

Perinatal HIV Transmission: Missed Opportunities and Proposed Solutions

Much progress has been made in the elimination of perinatal human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Since the 1980s, the transmission rate from pregnant women to their children has dropped from approximately 25% to less than 1% in resource-rich areas. Routine HIV testing in pregnancy, the introduction of multidrug antiretroviral therapy for pregnant women, and the recognition that HIV viral load directly correlates with viral transmission have all led to the elimination of perinatal HIV. However, there are still missed opportunities that could further minimize transmission.

Attitudes towards male partner HIV testing among low-income, minority pregnant women and their partners

OBJECTIVE

Primary prevention of maternal HIV seroconversion requires knowledge of the HIV status of sexual partners, but testing rates, particularly among urban minority heterosexual males, remain low. This study was initiated to understand the attitudes of pregnant women and their partners surrounding partner HIV testing.

METHODS

This was a qualitative study of pregnant women receiving publicly-funded prenatal care in a large urban hospital located in a high HIV prevalence area and their partners. Participants underwent in-depth individual interviews about HIV testing. Semi-structured interview guides were used to elicit participant attitudes. Transcripts were analyzed using the constant comparative method to determine themes and subthemes; analysis was organized by whether participants desired or declined partner testing.

RESULTS

Of 51 participants, 29 were pregnant women and 22 were male partners of female participants. Reasons for desiring or declining HIV testing aligned within three major themes: risk perception, logistical considerations, and testing history. An individual's perception of risk included evaluations of fetal safety as well as partner autonomy and fidelity. Logistical considerations included cost, test availability, and male partner geographic location. Individuals' recent testing histories also influenced testing preferences. One cross-cutting theme was of the pregnant woman taking responsibility for family health, which could serve as a motivator to test or reason to decline.

CONCLUSION

Pregnant women are often the linchpin of prevention of HIV transmission in the family unit. These data inform strategies to engage pregnant women and their partners to improve implementation of partner HIV testing in the prenatal setting.

ACOG Committee Opinion No. 751: Labor and Delivery Management of Women With Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection

This Committee Opinion is being revised to provide updated guidance on the management of pregnant women during pregnancy and delivery to prevent mother-to-child transmission of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Prevention of transmission of HIV from the woman to her fetus or newborn is a major goal in the care of pregnant women infected with HIV. Continuing research into mother-to-child transmission of HIV has suggested that a substantial number of cases of perinatal HIV transmission occur as the result of fetal exposure to the virus during labor and delivery. The precise mechanisms are not known. Established and ongoing research has shown that treatment of HIV-infected pregnant women with combined antiretroviral therapy can achieve a 1-2% or lower risk of mother-to-child transmission if maternal viral loads of 1,000 copies/mL or less can be sustained, independent of the route of delivery or duration of ruptured membranes before delivery. Vaginal delivery is appropriate for HIV-infected pregnant women who have been maintained on combined antiretroviral therapy and who have viral loads of 1,000 copies/mL or less at or near delivery. The risk of mother-to-child transmission in HIV-infected women with high viral loads can be reduced by performing cesarean deliveries before the onset of labor and before rupture of membranes (termed scheduled cesarean delivery in this document), in conjunction with the use of peripartum maternal antiretroviral therapy. Discussion of the option of scheduled cesarean delivery and its advantages in the situation of suboptimal viral suppression should begin as early as possible in pregnancy with every pregnant woman with HIV infection to give her an adequate opportunity to ask questions and consider her decision-making concerning the delivery plan. The patient's decision regarding her route of delivery should be respected after maternal and neonatal risks have been discussed.

Screening for HIV Infection: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement

IMPORTANCE

Approximately 1.1 million persons in the United States are currently living with HIV, and more than 700 000 persons have died of AIDS since the first cases were reported in 1981. There were approximately 38 300 new diagnoses of HIV infection in 2017. The estimated prevalence of HIV infection among persons 13 years and older in the United States is 0.4%, and data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention show a significant increase in HIV diagnoses starting at age 15 years. An estimated 8700 women living with HIV give birth each year in the United States. HIV can be transmitted from mother to child during pregnancy, labor, delivery, and breastfeeding. The incidence of perinatal HIV infection in the United States peaked in 1992 and has declined significantly following the implementation of routine prenatal HIV screening and the use of effective therapies and precautions to prevent mother-to-child transmission.

OBJECTIVE

To update the 2013 US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendation on screening for HIV infection in adolescents, adults, and pregnant women.

EVIDENCE REVIEW

The USPSTF reviewed the evidence on the benefits and harms of screening for HIV infection in nonpregnant adolescents and adults, the yield of screening for HIV infection at different intervals, the effects of initiating antiretroviral therapy (ART) at a higher vs lower CD4 cell count, and the longer-term harms associated with currently recommended ART regimens. The USPSTF also reviewed the evidence on the benefits (specifically, reduced risk of mother-to-child transmission of HIV infection) and harms of screening for HIV infection in pregnant persons, the yield of repeat screening for HIV at different intervals during pregnancy, the effectiveness of currently recommended ART regimens for reducing mother-to-child transmission of HIV infection, and the harms of ART during pregnancy to the mother and infant.

FINDINGS

The USPSTF found convincing evidence that currently recommended HIV tests are highly accurate in diagnosing HIV infection. The USPSTF found convincing evidence that identification and early treatment of HIV infection is of substantial benefit in reducing the risk of AIDS-related events or death. The USPSTF found convincing evidence that the use of ART is of substantial benefit in decreasing the risk of HIV transmission to uninfected sex partners. The USPSTF also found convincing evidence that identification and treatment of pregnant women living with HIV infection is of substantial benefit in reducing the rate of mother-to-child transmission. The USPSTF found adequate evidence that ART is associated with some harms, including neuropsychiatric, renal, and hepatic harms, and an increased risk of preterm birth in pregnant women. The USPSTF concludes with high certainty that the net benefit of screening for HIV infection in adolescents, adults, and pregnant women is substantial.

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION

The USPSTF recommends screening for HIV infection in adolescents and adults aged 15 to 65 years. Younger adolescents and older adults who are at increased risk of infection should also be screened. (A recommendation) The USPSTF recommends screening for HIV infection in all pregnant persons, including those who present in labor or at delivery whose HIV status is unknown. (A recommendation).