Postoperative Lower Extremity Neuropathy With Boot Stirrups Compared With Candy Cane Stirrups

A Randomized Controlled Comparative Study of the Three Over-Bed Techniques for Positioning and Repositioning the Lithotomy Position While Using Stirrups

Objective

In this study, the clinical application and efficacy of three different methods for placing and repositioning patients in the lithotomy position over the bed using stirrups were evaluated.

Methods

A total of 240 surgical patients who underwent surgery in Chongqing Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital between July and November 2022 were selected as study participants. Using envelopes, they were randomly divided into three groups of 80 cases each using a randomization method. The groups included the traditional over-bed method, the postural trolley-assisted over-bed method, and the direct over-bed method. Using the Kruskal-Wallis rank-sum test, analysis of variance, and multiple linear regression equations, the placement time, over-bed repositioning time, and total time of the three methods for placing and repositioning in the lithotomy position supported by stirrups were analyzed statistically. In addition, we investigated and examined the satisfaction of nurses and doctors with the aforementioned techniques.

Results

The placement time, repositioning time, and total time were significantly higher for the traditional over-bed method than for the postural trolley-assisted over-bed method and the direct over-bed method (both P < 0.01). However, there was no statistically significant difference between the postural trolley-assisted over-bed method and the direct over-bed method (P > 0.05). Nurses and doctors reported significantly higher satisfaction with the postural trolley-assisted over-bed method and the direct over-bed method compared to the traditional over-bed method (both P < 0.01). In addition, nurses were more satisfied with the direct over-bed method than the postural trolley-assisted over-bed method (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

The results of this study demonstrate that the direct over-bed method is preferred for positioning and repositioning patients in the lithotomy position with the support of stirrups.

Postoperative Femoral Nerve Palsy and Meralgia Paresthetica after Gynecologic Oncologic Surgery

Femoral nerve palsy and meralgia paresthetica following gynecologic cancer surgery are rare, but severe and long lasting. Here, we aimed to study their incidence, severity, possible risk factors and its time to remission. Between January 2008 and December 2017 976 gynecologic cancer patients were identified in our institutional database receiving surgery. Complete patient charts were reviewed retrospectively. Possible risk factors were analyzed by Fisher’s exact test. 441 (45.18%) out 976 were treated for Ovarian cancer. In total 23 patients were identified with a postoperative neurological leg disorder. A femoral nerve palsy was present in 15 patients (1.5%) and a meralgia paresthetica in 8 patients (0.82%). Three patients showed both disorders. Duration of surgery (p = 0.0000), positioning during surgery (p = 0.0040), femoral artery catheter (p = 0.0051), prior chemotherapy (p = 0.0007), nicotine abuse (p = 0.00456) and prior polyneuropathy (p = 0.0181) showed a significant association with a postoperative femoral nerve palsy. Nicotine abuse (p = 0.0335) and prior chemotherapy (p = 0.0151) were significant for the development of a meralgia paresthetica. Long lasting surgery, patient positioning and femoral arterial catheter placement are risk factors for a postoperative femoral nerve palsy in gynecologic cancer surgery. Polyneuropathy, nicotine abuse, and prior chemotherapy are predisposing risk factors for a femoral nerve palsy and a meralgia paresthetica. A resolution of symptoms is the rule for both disorders within different time schedules.

Natural history of postoperative neuropathies in gynecologic surgery

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Neuropathy following pelvic surgery is an uncommon but important complication. The current literature about the natural history and treatment of these neuropathies is limited. We aim to describe the characteristics, treatments and natural history of postoperative neuropathy following benign gynecologic surgery.

METHODS

This retrospective case series included patients who underwent benign gynecologic surgery for ≥ 60 min in lithotomy. Patients with preexisting neurologic disease were excluded. Patient demographics, identification of postoperative neuropathy and details regarding evaluation and treatment were obtained from the medical record. Neuropathies were characterized by anatomic location and nerve/dermatome distribution. Duration of symptoms was classified as < 1 week, 1 week to 3 months or > 3 months with neuropathy symptoms grouped as resolved, persistent but improved or persistent. Data were analyzed with appropriate descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation and chi-square test.

RESULTS

The study included 2449 patients who had undergone benign gynecologic surgery, with 78 (3.2%) patients identified as having postoperative neuropathy. Most patients with neuropathies demonstrated either complete resolution [59 (75.6%)] or persistent but improved [13 (16.7%)] symptoms. Twenty-eight (35.9%) had symptoms of ≥ 3 months. Most neuropathies were sensory only [63 (80.8%)], and the most frequently documented nerve distribution was femoral [23 (29.5%)]. Evaluation and treatment of neuropathy most commonly included physical therapy consult [17 (21.8%)] and neurology consult [8 (10.3%)].

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of postoperative neuropathy in this large, benign gynecologic surgery population was 3.2%. Most neuropathies are sensory only and self-limited. While physical therapy was the most common treatment, most patients received no specific intervention.

Complications in laparoscopic and robotic-assisted surgery: definitions, classifications, incidence and risk factors - an up-to-date review

Almost all gynecological and general-surgical operations are - or can be - performed laparoscopically. In comparison to an abdominal approach, the minimally invasive access offers several advantages; however, laparoscopy (both conventional and robotic-assisted) can be associated with a number of approach-specific complications. Although the majority of them are related to the laparoscopic entry, adverse events may also occur due to the presence of pneumoperitoneum or the use of laparoscopic instruments. Unfortunately, a high proportion of complications (especially affecting the bowel and ureter) remain unrecognized during surgery. This narrative review provides comprehensive up-to-date information about definitions, classifications, risk factors and incidence of surgical complications in conventional and robotic-assisted laparoscopy, with a special focus on gynecology. The topic is discussed from various perspectives, e.g. in the context of stage of surgery, injured organs, involved instruments, and in relation to malpractice claims.