Resting β-Adrenergic Blockade Does Not Alter Exercise Thermoregulation in Children With Burn Injury: A Randomized Control Trial

Application of beta-blockers in burn management

Severe burn injuries cause chronic inflammation, which produces a subsequent hypermetabolic response that starts immediately and persists for at least 3 years. The hypermetabolic state, which is thought to be due to postburn elevations of endogenous catecholamines and cortisol, is associated with a number of harmful physiologic derangements including immunosuppression, impaired wound healing, muscle catabolism, and hepatic dysfunction. Beta-blockers have become first line agents for reducing these adverse effects of hypermetabolism in severe burns. This review discusses the underlying pharmacological mechanisms demonstrated by clinical studies evaluating the safety and efficacy of beta-blockers in the management of burn injuries. A literature search was performed using the PubMed database to identify articles on beta-blockers and burn management. The review yielded 33 relevant results consisting of randomized controlled trials, original research articles, and meta-analyses in pediatric and adult burn patients. Propranolol administration reduced insulin resistance, lipolysis, proteolysis, cardiac work, and bone loss resulting from burn-associated hypermetabolism. Propranolol also effectively reduced myocardial stress, resting energy expenditure, and central deposition of fat. Recent studies have begun to evaluate incorporation of anabolic agents and rehabilitative exercise therapy. However, at this time propranolol continues to be the most effective therapy for reducing the hypermetabolic response and other morbidities resulting from burn injuries.

Rehabilitative Exercise Training for Burn Injury

Due to improvements in acute burn care over the last few decades, most patients with severe burns (up to 90% of the total body surface) survive. However, the metabolic and cardiovascular complications that accompany a severe burn can persist for up to 3 years post injury. Accordingly, there is now a greater appreciation of the need for strategies that can hasten recovery and reduce long-term morbidity post burn. Rehabilitation exercise training (RET) is a proven effective treatment to restore lean body mass, glucose and protein metabolism, cardiorespiratory fitness, and muscle strength in burn survivors. Despite this, very few hospitals incorporate RET in programs to aid the rehabilitation of patients with severe burns. Given that RET is a safe and efficacious treatment that restores function and reduces post-burn morbidity, we propose that a long-term exercise prescription plan should be considered for all patients with severe burns. In this literature review, we discuss the current understanding of burn trauma on major organ systems, and the positive benefits of incorporating RET as a part of the long-term rehabilitation of severely burned individuals. We also provide burn-specific exercise prescription guidelines for clinical exercise physiologists.

Anabolic and anticatabolic agents used in burn care: What is known and what is yet to be learned

Major thermal injury induces profound metabolic derangements secondary to an inflammatory "stress-induced" hormonal environment. Several pharmacological interventions have been tested in an effort to halt the hypermetabolic response to severe burns. Insulin, insulin growth factor 1, insulin growth factor binding protein 3, metformin, human growth hormone, thyroid hormones, testosterone, oxandrolone, and propranolol, among others, have been proposed to have anabolic or anticatabolic effects. The aim of this broad analysis of pharmacological interventions was to raise awareness of treatment options and to help establishing directions for future clinical research efforts. A PubMed search was conducted on the anabolic and anticatabolic agents used in burn care. One hundred and thirty-five human studies published between 1999 and 2017 were included in this review. The pharmacological properties, rationale for the treatments, efficacy considerations and side effect profiles are summarized in the article. Many of the drugs tested for investigational purposes in the severely thermally injured are not yet gold-standard therapies in spite of their potential benefit. Propranolol and oxandrolone have shown great promise but further evidence is still needed to clarify their potential use for anabolic and anticatabolic purposes.

Burn Injury May Have Age-Dependent Effects on Strength and Aerobic Exercise Capacity in Males

Whether burn injury affects boys and men differently is currently unknown. To test the hypothesis that burned boys have lower exercise capacity and exercise training-induced responses compared with burned men, 40 young boys (12 ± 4 years, 149 ± 20 cm, 46 ± 18 kg) were matched to 35 adult men (33 ± 9 years, 174 ± 10 cm, 84 ± 16 kg) based on extent of burn injury (total body surface area burned, boys 46 ± 14% vs men 47 ± 30, P = .85) and length of hospital stay (boys 33 ± 23 vs men 41 ± 32 days, P = .23). Strength (peak torque) and cardiorespiratory fitness (peak VO2) were normalized to kg of lean body mass for group comparisons. Each group was also compared with normative age-sex matched values at discharge and after an aerobic and resistance exercise training (RET) program. A two-way factorial analysis of covariance assessed interaction and main effects of group and time. We found that boys and men showed similar pre-RET to post-RET increases in total lean (~4%) and fat (7%) mass (each P ≤ .008). Both groups had lower age-sex matched norm values at discharge for peak torque (boys 36%; men 51% of normative values) and peak VO2 (boys: 44; men: 59%; each P ≤ .0001). Boys strength were 13-15 per cent lower than men at discharge and after RET (main effect for group, P < .0001). Cardiorespiratory fitness improved to a greater extent in men (19%) compared with boys (10%) after the RET (group × time interaction, P = .011). These results show that at discharge and after RET, burn injury may have age-dependent effects and should be considered when evaluating efficacy and progress of the exercise program.

Children with severe burns display no sex differences in exercise capacity at hospital discharge or adaptation after exercise rehabilitation training

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Females have a 50% increased risk of death from burn injury compared to males. However, whether exercise capacity and exercise induced training adaptations differ between burned boys and girls is unknown. This project tested the hypothesis that girls with burns have lower exercise capacity and different exercise induced training adaptations.

METHODS

Twenty-five girls were matched to 26 boys (mean, 95%CI; years 13 [12,14], cm 151 [143,161], kg 54 [45,63]; each P>0.05) for burn injury (% total body surface area burn, 54 [45,62]; P=0.82). Lean body mass (LBM), strength (peak torque) and cardiorespiratory fitness (peak VO₂) were normalized to kg LBM and compared as a percentage of age-sex matched non-burned children (n=26 boys, years 13 [12,14]; n=25 girls, years 13 [12,14]) at discharge (DC) and after aerobic and resistance rehabilitation exercise training (RET).

RESULTS

Using a 2-way factorial ANOVA (group×time), we found both groups had similar 11% change in LBM (87.3% of non-burned values [82.2,92.3]) and after the RET (92.8% [87.2,98.3]; main effect, time P<0.0001). Peak torque increased similarly by 16% in both groups (% of age-sex matched non-burned DC, 55.9 [51.3,60.5]; after RET, 77.5 [72.1,82.9]; main effect, time P<0.0001). Likewise, peak VO₂ increased in both groups by 15% (% of age-sex matched non-burned DC, 56.8 [52.4,61.2] to RET, 72.2 [67.6,76.8]; main effect, time; P<0.0001). Burned children exercise at greater percentage of their peak VO₂ and peak HR compared to non-burned children (Interaction, group×time, P<0.0001).

CONCLUSION

The burn injury does not have sex-dependent effects on LBM or exercise capacity in severely burn injured children. Differences in relative peak VO₂ and peak HR suggest the need for burn specific exercise programs for improving the efficacy of a rehabilitation program.

Cardiorespiratory Capacity and Strength Remain Attenuated in Children with Severe Burn Injuries at Over 3 Years Postburn

OBJECTIVES

To compare physical capacity and body composition between children with burn injuries at approximately 4 years postburn and healthy, fit children.

STUDY DESIGN

In this retrospective, case-control study, we analyzed the strength, aerobic capacity, and body composition of children with severe burn injuries (n = 40) at discharge, after completion of a 6- to 12-week rehabilitative exercise training program, and at 3-4 years postburn. Values were expressed as a relative percentage of those in age- and sex-matched children for comparison (n = 40 for discharge and postexercise; n = 40 for 3.5 years postburn).

RESULTS

At discharge, lean body mass was 89% of that in children without burn injuries, and exercise rehabilitation restored this to 94% (P < .01). At 3.5 years postburn, lean body mass (94%), bone mineral content (89%), and bone mineral density (93%; each P ≤ .02) remained reduced, whereas total body fat was increased (148%, P = .01). Cardiorespiratory fitness remained lower in children with burn injuries both after exercise training (75%; P < .0001) and 3.5 years later (87%; P < .001). Peak torque (60%; P < .0001) and average power output (58%; P < .0001) were lower after discharge. Although exercise training improved these, they failed to reach levels achieved in healthy children without burns (83-84%; P < .0001) but were maintained at 85% and 82%, respectively, 3.5 years later (P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Although the benefits of rehabilitative exercise training on strength and cardiorespiratory capacity are maintained at almost 4 years postburn, they are not restored fully to the levels of healthy children. Although the underlying mechanism of this phenomenon remains elusive, these findings suggest that future development of continuous exercise rehabilitation interventions after discharge may further narrow the gap in relation to healthy adolescents.