Streamlining Postoperative Care After Pediatric Supracondylar Humerus Fractures: Is Follow-up After Pin Removal Routinely Needed?

Postoperative Immobilization Period for Pediatric Supracondylar Fractures: The Shorter the Better?

BACKGROUND

There are now recognized standards of care published by the British and American Orthopaedic Associations which detail key areas of evidence-based recommendations for the treatment of children with displaced supracondylar humerus fractures. Although many aspects of treatment are covered in these recommendations, both the American and British Orthopaedic Associations do not recommend the exact duration of immobilization postoperatively.

METHODS

This study retrospectively compared outcomes of operatively managed supracondylar fractures immobilized postoperatively for short immobilization (SI) defined as 28 days or less, with long immobilization (LI) defined as more than 28 days. The outcomes measured were clinical (deformity, range of motion, and pin site infection) and radiologic (loss of position after the removal of K-wires, Baumann's angle, anterior humeral line, refracture, and signs of osteomyelitis). Demographic data were recorded to evaluate and ensure satisfactory matching of the 2 groups for analysis.

RESULTS

The study included 193 pediatric supracondylar fractures over a 4-year period which were treated with manipulation under anesthetic and K-wire fixation. The difference in average time in plaster between the 2 groups was statistically significant (SI: n=27.5 d, SD 1.23; LI: n=43.9 d, SD 15.29, P =0.0001). Data for operative techniques-closed or open reduction (SI: n=66, LI: n=78, P =0.59), and crossed wires (SI: n=37, LI: n=50, P =0.57) between the two groups showed no statistical significance. There was no statistical difference between the groups for the average number of days postoperatively at which wires were taken out (SI: n=28.9 d, SD 5.95, LI: n=30.1 d, SD 5.57, P =0.15), number of pin site infections requiring antibiotic treatment (SI: n=3, LI: n=5, P =0.70), or children from each group who were recorded to have regained full range of motion symmetrical to their contralateral arm (SI: n=79, LI: n=99, P =0.74).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study therefore suggests that shorter immobilization of these patients (SI group) does not yield a higher rate of complications including refracture and malunion.

Value-Driven Pediatric Supracondylar Humerus Fracture Care: Implementing Evidence-Based Practices

Supracondylar humerus fractures are high-volume injuries in children; therefore, value-driven treatment has far-reaching implications for patients and families as well as healthcare systems. Children younger than 5 years can remodel posterior angulation. Most Type IIa fractures will maintain alignment after closed reduction. Many patients with surgical fractures can safely wait for nonemergent fixation. Outpatient surgery is associated with shorter surgical time, lower costs, and fewer return visits to the emergency department with no increase in adverse events. Type III fractures treated the following day do not have higher rates of open reduction, and patients with associated nerve injuries have no difference in recovery time compared with those treated more urgently. Pediatric-trained surgeons generally provide more efficient care (shorter surgical time and less after-hours surgery); however, their outcomes are equivalent to non-pediatric orthopaedic surgeons. Community hospitals have lower costs compared with teaching hospitals; therefore, transferring patients should be avoided when feasible. Postoperative care can be streamlined in uncomplicated cases to minimize radiographs, therapy referrals, and multiple visits. Splinting offers safer, lower cost immobilization over casting. With staffing shortages and an increasingly burdened healthcare system, it is imperative to maximize nonsurgical care, use outpatient facilities, and minimize postoperative requirements without negatively affecting patient outcomes.

New Injury Patterns in Pediatric Supracondylar Fractures During COVID-19: Beds Are the New Monkey Bars

BACKGROUND

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic drastically altered children's activity patterns. Our goal was to investigate how COVID-19 affected demographics, injury characteristics, treatment patterns, follow-up, and outcomes in pediatric supracondylar humerus (SCH) fractures.

METHODS

This was an Institutional Review Board-approved retrospective analysis of patients undergoing surgery for a SCH fracture from May to November 2019 (pre-COVID-19) and from May to November 2020 (during COVID-19) at 2 tertiary children's hospitals. Demographic information, injury characteristics, hospital course, and follow-up data were collected and compared.

RESULTS

SCH fractures decreased by >50% from 2019 (149) to 2020 (72). Children in the 2020 cohort were younger (mean 5.2 y old) compared with 2019 (6.0 y old) ( P =0.019). Mechanism of injury was significantly different in 2020 ( P <0.001), as the proportion of trampoline and furniture fractures increased from 8% and 17% to 15% and 33%, respectively. The proportion of playground and monkey bar fractures decreased from 20% and 17% to 3% and 4%, respectively. Distribution of Gartland type and neurovascular injury rates were similar in 2019 and 2020 ( P =0.411 and 0.538). Time from emergency department admission to the operating room and duration of hospital admission were both unchanged from 2019 to 2020 ( P =0.864 and 0.363). The duration of postoperative follow-up in 2019 was 94.5 days compared with 72.8 days in 2020 ( P =0.122), as more pandemic patients were lost to follow up (22.5% vs. 35.2%, P =0.049).

CONCLUSIONS

The demographics, mechanism of injury, and follow-up practices of pediatric SCH fractures changed significantly during the pandemic, likely because of school closures and lock-downs changing activity patterns. Different mechanisms of injury affected younger patients and reflected the new ways children played. Trampoline-related and furniture-related injuries overtook the classic playground falls as primary mechanism of injury. Despite the need for COVID-19 testing, there was no delay in time to the operating room. Hospitalization duration did not change, yet postoperative follow-up was shorter, and more patients were lost to follow up. Despite these stressors, outcomes remained excellent in most children.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III-Retrospective comparative study.

Radiographic considerations for pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures

Although supracondylar humerus fractures are common pediatric injuries, guidelines for postoperative imaging remain unclear. This study's purpose was to evaluate decision-making at various points in the postoperative period. The secondary objective was to compare the use of mini C arm fluoroscopy and flat plate X-rays at the first postoperative visit. A retrospective, cohort study was performed at one level I trauma center. Patients ages 1 to 14 with extension Gartland type II-IV supracondylar fractures sustained between January 2013 and May 2020 and treated with closed or open reduction and percutaneous fixation were included. Data collected included demographics, fracture characteristics, and imaging information. Of 553 patients who underwent surgery, 375 (67.8%) received intraoperative images after casting; none resulted in an intraoperative intervention. Of 463 patients with imaging at first follow-up, nine (1.9%) had a management modification, including seven for loss of reduction, all determined by the original operating surgeon. The method of imaging, did not differ significantly with respect to revision surgery. Twenty-six (4.0%) of 532 patients with imaging at pin removal received additional casting after pin removal, but no patients had their pins retained. This retrospective study examined the efficacy of imaging in pediatric supracondylar fractures. Intraoperative, postcasting images did not change management and should be discontinued. Imaging at first follow-up can be useful in identifying patients with loss of reduction and mini C arm serves as a viable alternative to standard X-rays. Finally, imaging at pin removal resulted in additional casting only in type III fractures. Level of evidence: Level III-retrospective, cohort study.

Standardizing a Postoperative Protocol for Supracondylar Humerus Fractures

BACKGROUND

Supracondylar humerus fractures are the most commonly operated upper extremity fracture in pediatric orthopaedics, yet there does not currently exist a standardized recommendation for a postoperative protocol. As advanced practice providers take on larger roles in the care of fracture patients, it may alleviate confusion to standardize postoperative protocols. The aim of this study was to compare outcomes between three different postoperative management protocols following operative fixation of supracondylar humerus fractures.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study of all patients who underwent operative fixation of a supracondylar humerus fracture during the 2014 to 2015 academic year. Postoperative protocols were classified as either "liberal," "intermediate," or "conservative," based on how quickly the surgeon allowed unrestricted motion of the elbow postoperatively. Patients were evaluated for range of motion, functional elbow motion, and elbow clinical function, as well for postoperative complications. Univariate analysis was conducted to detect the differences in outcomes between protocol groups with P<0.01 considered significant.

RESULTS

One hundred patients were included in the final analysis, with 17 patients in the liberal group, 50 in the intermediate group, and 33 in the conservative group. There were no differences in patient population (age, sex, fracture type, concomitant nerve palsy, ipsilateral injuries, or physical therapy referrals) between the groups (P>0.01). There were no differences in range of motion, functional motion, or elbow clinical function (P>0.01) between the postoperative protocol groups. There were no postoperative complications (unplanned return to operating room, refracture, need for fixation revision, or infection) in any patient.

CONCLUSIONS

There were no differences in postoperative complications or outcomes between the patients in the liberal, intermediate, or conservative protocol groups. In an efficiency-focused era, we conclude that a standardized liberal protocol be considered at a busy orthopaedic center.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

This study is a level III therapeutic study. It is a retrospective study that compares the outcomes after following 1 of 3 different postoperative protocols.