Prevention of Wrong-level Surgery in the Thoracic Spine: Preoperative Computer Tomography Fluoroscopy-guided Percutaneous Gold Fiducial Marker Placement in 57 Patients

Preoperative coil localization for spinal surgery is accurate, safe and effective: a single-centre initial experience

OBJECTIVE AND STUDY DESIGN

This is a retrospective, descriptive study of consecutive patients undergoing novel preoperative pushable coil localization for spinal surgery, in order to evaluate its feasibility, safety and accuracy.

METHODS

Consecutive patients who underwent pre-operative coil marking for spinal surgery at our institution from May 2018 to July 2021 were included. Data were collected for coil placement, accuracy, complications and fluoroscopy usage. Patient demographic and relevant perioperative and procedural data were also collected.

RESULTS

A total of 34 patients were identified of which 32 (94%) had complete data and imaging at last clinical follow up, with a mean duration of 13.9 months. There were no incorrect level surgeries performed. There were no coil-related complications found in our cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative coil placement is an accurate, safe and well-tolerated method for level localization in spinal surgeries.

Wrong-level spine surgery: A multicenter retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Wrong-level spine surgery is a rare but serious complication of spinal surgery that increases patient harm and legal risks. Although such surgeries have been reported by many spine surgeons, they have not been adequately investigated. Therefore, this study aimed to examine the causes and preventive measures for wrong-level spine surgeries.

METHODS

This study analyzed cases of wrong-level spine surgeries from 10 medical centers. Factors such as age, sex, body mass index, preoperative diagnosis, surgical details, surgeon's experience, anatomical variations, responses, and causes of the wrong-level spine surgeries were studied. The methods used by the surgeons to confirm the surgical level were also surveyed using a questionnaire for each surgical procedure and site.

RESULTS

Eighteen cases (13 men and 5 women; mean age, 61.2 years; mean body mass index, 24.5 kg/m2) of wrong-level spine surgeries were evaluated in the study. Two cases involved emergency surgeries, three involved newly introduced procedures, and five showed anatomical variations. Wrong-level spine surgeries occurred more frequently in patients who underwent posterior thoracic surgery than in those who underwent other techniques (p < 0.01). Twenty-two spinal surgeons described the methods used to confirm the levels preoperatively and intraoperatively. In posterior thoracic laminectomies, half of the surgeons used preoperative markers to confirm the surgical level and did not perform intraoperative fluoroscopy. In posterior thoracic fusion, all surgeons confirmed the level using fluoroscopy preoperatively and intraoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

Wrong-level spine surgeries occurred more frequently in posterior thoracic surgeries. The thoracic spine lacks the anatomical characteristics observed in the cervical and lumbar spine. The large drop in the spinous process can make it challenging for surgeons to determine the positional relationship between the spinous process and the vertebral body. Moreover, unfamiliarity with the technique and anatomical variations were also risk factors for wrong-level spine surgeries.

Oblique radiograph with methylene blue marking: A reliable technique for upper thoracic level localization

Purpose

Traditionally, plain radiographs are used in intraoperative spinal level localization (SLL), whereas counting vertebrae is often hampered by shoulders and scapulae in lateral views, thus increasing the potential for wrong-level surgery. To improve the localization accuracy, this study evaluated the safety and feasibility of oblique radiographs with methylene blue markings for SLL and explored the optimal angle and height of oblique radiographs.

Methods

The clinical data of 33 patients with upper thoracic spine lesions who were operated on in our hospital from January 2021 to April 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Oblique radiographs with methylene blue markings were used for intraoperative SLL.

Results

A total of 33 patients were included in this study. The average BMI was 24.3 ± 0.7 kg/m². The ipsilateral lamina structures were clearly shown in all cases. The median radiographing times of all the patients was 3, and the median radiographing duration was 2 min and 25 s. The average angle of oblique radiographs was 55.1 ± 3.8°, and the average distance from the skin to the root of the spinous process was 4.9 ± 1.2 cm.

Conclusions

Using oblique radiographs with methylene blue markings, not only the bone structure of an upper thoracic spine can be revealed clearly, but also the positioning deviation of traditional needle localization can be avoided. The lesion segment can be precisely located by this technology during surgery. Our angle of oblique radiographs and height determination method can be used to reduce the radiation exposure and shorten the operation time.

Fluoroscopy- and CT-Guided Gold Fiducial Marker Placement for Intraoperative Localization during Spinal Surgery: Review of 179 Cases at a Single Institution-Technique and Safety Profile

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Wrong-level spinal surgery, especially in the thoracic spine, remains a challenge for a variety of reasons related to visualization, such as osteopenia, large body habitus, severe kyphosis, radiographic misinterpretation, or anatomic variation. Preoperative fiducial marker placement performed in a dedicated imaging suite has been proposed to facilitate identification of thoracic spine vertebral levels. In this current study, we report our experience using image-guided percutaneous gold fiducial marker placement to enhance the accuracy and safety of thoracic spinal surgical procedures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of all fluoroscopy- or CT-guided gold fiducial markers placed at our institution between January 3, 2019, and March 16, 2022. A chart review of 179 patients was performed detailing the procedural approach and clinical information. In addition, the method of gold fiducial marker placement (fluoroscopy/CT), procedure duration, spinal level of the gold fiducial marker, radiation dose, fluoroscopy time, surgery date, and complications (including whether wrong-level surgery occurred) were recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 179 patients (104 female) underwent gold fiducial marker placement. The mean age was 57 years (range, 12-96 years). Fiducial marker placement was performed by 13 different neuroradiologists. All placements were technically successful without complications. All 179 (100%) operations were performed at the correct level. Most fiducial markers (143) were placed with fluoroscopy with the most common location at T6-T8. The most common location for placement in CT was at T3 and T4.

CONCLUSIONS

All operations guided with gold fiducial markers were performed at the correct level. There were no complications of fiducial marker placement.

The utility of internal spinal marking for intraoperative localisation: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Incorrect level spinal surgery is an avoidable complication, with significant ramifications. Several pre-operative spinal marking techniques have been described to aid intraoperative localisation.

METHODS

A systematic search of Ovid MEDLINE, and EMBASE was performed from inception to July 2022. All publications describing cases of internal spinal marking were included for further analysis. 22 articles describing 503 patients satisfied our eligibility criteria.

RESULTS

A number of localisation techniques, including endovascular coiling (n = 16), fiducials (n = 177), dye (n = 109), needle/fixed wire (n = 199), cement (n = 4), and gadolinium tubes (n = 1) were described. The highest rates of technical success were observed with endovascular coiling, fiducials, cement and dye (100 %), and complication rates were lowest with endovascular coiling, fiducials and cement (0 %).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, internal spinal marking was effective and safe. When considering practicality and efficacy, fiducial marking appears the optimal technique, as it can be performed in the outpatient setting under local anaesthesia. This review demonstrates the need for more targeted investigation into localisation methods in spinal surgery.

Pre- and intraoperative thoracic spine localization techniques: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

In the era of modern medicine with an armamentarium full of state-of-the art technologies at our disposal, the incidence of wrong-level spinal surgery remains problematic. In particular, the thoracic spine presents a challenge for accurate localization due partly to body habitus, anatomical variations, and radiographic artifact from the ribs and scapula. The present review aims to assess and describe thoracic spine localization techniques.

METHODS

The authors performed a literature search using the PubMed database from 1990 to 2020, compliant with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). A total of 27 articles were included in this qualitative review.

RESULTS

A number of pre- and intraoperative strategies have been devised and employed to facilitate correct-level localization. Some of the more well-described approaches include fiducial metallic markers (screw or gold), metallic coils, polymethylmethacrylate, methylene blue, marking wire, use of intraoperative neuronavigation, intraoperative localization techniques (including using a needle, temperature probe, fluoroscopy, MRI, and ultrasonography), and skin marking.

CONCLUSIONS

While a number of techniques exist to accurately localize lesions in the thoracic spine, each has its advantages and disadvantages. Ultimately, the localization technique deployed by the spine surgeon will be patient-specific but often based on surgeon preference.