1
|
Jorda-Gomez P, Vanaclocha V, Vanaclocha A, Atienza CM, Belloch V, Santabarbara JM, Barrios C, Saiz-Sapena N, Medina-Ripoll E, Vanaclocha L. Cadaveric biomechanical studies of ADDISC total lumbar disc prosthesis. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2024; 112:106185. [PMID: 38262121 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2024.106185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2023] [Revised: 01/11/2024] [Accepted: 01/15/2024] [Indexed: 01/25/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Most total disc replacements provide excessive mobility and not reproduce spinal kinematics, inducing zygapophyseal joint arthritic changes and chronic back pain. In cadaveric lumbosacral spines, we studied if a new lumbar disc prosthesis kinematics mimics the intact intervertebral disc. METHODS In eight cold preserved cadaveric lumbosacral spines, we registered the movement ranges in flexion, extension, right and left lateral bending, and rotation in the intact status, post-discectomy, and after our prosthesis implantation, comparing them for each specimen. FINDINGS Comparing the intact lumbosacral spine with the L4-L5 prosthesis implanted specimens, we saw statistically significant differences in lateral bending and right rotation but not in the full range of rotation. Analyzing segments, we also noticed statistically significant differences at L4-L5 in flexion-extension and rotation. On the other hand, the L4-L5 discectomy, compared to the baseline spine condition, showed a statistically significant mobility increase in flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation, with an abnormal instantaneous center of rotation, which destabilizes the segment partly due to anterior annulus surgical removal. Disc prosthesis implantation reversed these changes in instantaneous center of rotation, but the prosthesis failed to restore the initial range of motion due to the destabilization of the ligaments in the operated disc. INTERPRETATION The ADDISC total disc replacement reproduces the intact disc kinematics and Instantaneous Center of Rotation, but the prosthesis fails to restore the initial range of motion due to ligament destabilization. More studies will be necessary to define a technique that restores the damaged ligaments when implanting the prosthesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Amparo Vanaclocha
- Instituto de Biomecánica (IBV), Universitat Politècnica de Valencia, Valencia. Spain
| | - Carlos M Atienza
- Instituto de Biomecánica (IBV), Universitat Politècnica de Valencia, Valencia. Spain
| | | | | | - Carlos Barrios
- Catholic University of Valencia, Saint Vincent Martyr, Valencia, Spain
| | | | - Enrique Medina-Ripoll
- Instituto de Biomecánica (IBV), Universitat Politècnica de Valencia, Valencia. Spain
| | - Leyre Vanaclocha
- Medius Klinik, Ostfildern-Ruit Klinik für Urologie, Hedelfinger Strasse 166, 73760 Ostfildern, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yu Z, Shea K, Stankovic T. The Application of a Multi-Material Flexible Chain Mail for the Design of an Artificial Spinal Disc to Reproduce Natural Nonlinear and Anisotropic Rotational Behavior. 3D PRINTING AND ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING 2023; 10:1238-1250. [PMID: 38143713 PMCID: PMC10734901 DOI: 10.1089/3dp.2021.0299] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2023]
Abstract
Inspired by the potential of architected materials for achieving biomimicking functionalities and the advancement of multi-material additive manufacturing to fabricate parts with complex structures and heterogeneous material distributions, this study investigates the feasibility of using a multi-material, flexible chain mail sheet for the design of an additively manufactured artificial spinal disc for reproducing patient-specific anisotropic and nonlinear rotational behaviors. The application of a chain mail-based structure is motivated by its similarities in behaviors compared with a natural disc's fiber network that likewise has negligible bending stiffness and shape-changing ability. The proposed approach for the chain mail sheet design includes an initial characterization of the uniaxial tensile responses of the chain mail unit cell defined as the basic building block of the chain mail sheet, modeling and response calculation, and material optimization. Results show that the additively manufactured chain mail sheet is not only able to exhibit a natural strain-stiffening rotational response but also is able to reproduce natural anisotropy of three natural disc specimens in the six most common rotational scenarios in daily life. This study shows the potential of additively manufactured mechanical-metamaterials-inspired structures for implant design to restore natural mechanics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhiyang Yu
- Engineering Design and Computing Laboratory, Department of Mechanical and Process Engineering, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Kristina Shea
- Engineering Design and Computing Laboratory, Department of Mechanical and Process Engineering, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Tino Stankovic
- Engineering Design and Computing Laboratory, Department of Mechanical and Process Engineering, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Liu Z, Rong X, Liu H, Ding C, Hong Y, Wang B. Effect of Facet Tropism on Postoperative Cervical Range of Motion After Single-Level Cervical Disc Arthroplasty. Global Spine J 2022; 12:1696-1707. [PMID: 33511887 PMCID: PMC9609535 DOI: 10.1177/2192568220986144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective analysis. OBJECTIVES Cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) was designed to replace the degenerated disc with the prosthesis to preserve cervical motion. The commonly used artificial discs are designed symmetric, whereas the facet joints were reported to be asymmetric in many people. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of facet tropism on the cervical range of motion (ROM) after single-level CDA using Prestige LP. METHODS A total of 90 patients who underwent single-level CDA using Prestige LP from 2012 to 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Radiographs were taken at each time point to measure the C2-C7 ROM and the ROM at the surgical segment. The pre-operation CT scans were utilized to reconstruct and calculate the angular direction of facet joints with respect to transverse, coronal, and sagittal reference planes. Facet tropism above 7° was defined as facet joint asymmetry. RESULTS No significant difference was found in flexion-extension C2-C7 ROM or ROM at the surgical segment between patients with symmetric and asymmetric fact joints regarding the sagittal plane. Patients with coronal asymmetric facet joints had lower flexion-extension ROM at the surgical level. Patients with transverse asymmetric facet joints had both lower flexion-extension C2-C7 ROM and ROM at the surgical level. After CDA surgery, patients obtained good clinical outcomes including increased Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) and decreased Neck Disability Index (NDI) as well as Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). CONCLUSION The coronal and transverse tropism seemed to be correlated with decreased flexion-extension ROM after CDA using Prestige LP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ziyang Liu
- Department of Orthopedics, West China
Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China,Department of Orthopedics, Tianjin
Hospital, Tianjin Province, China
| | - Xin Rong
- Department of Orthopedics, West China
Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Hao Liu
- Department of Orthopedics, West China
Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China,Hao Liu, Department of Orthopedic Surgery,
West China Hospital, No. 37, Guo Xue Xiang, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province,
China.
| | - Chen Ding
- Department of Orthopedics, West China
Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Ying Hong
- Department of Operating Room, West China
Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Beiyu Wang
- Department of Orthopedics, West China
Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Guyer RD, Albano JL, Ohnmeiss DD. Cervical Total Disc Replacement: Novel Devices. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2021; 32:449-460. [PMID: 34538471 DOI: 10.1016/j.nec.2021.05.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
This article reviews the available literature for novel cervical total disc replacement devices, including ones which are available inside and outside of the United States. It includes biomechanical consideration as well as design characteristics and clinical data when available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard D Guyer
- Center for Disc Replacement at Texas Back Institute, 6020 W. Parker Rd. #200, Plano, TX 75093, USA.
| | - Joseph L Albano
- Texas Back Institute, 6020 W. Parker Rd. #200, Plano, TX 75093, USA
| | - Donna D Ohnmeiss
- Texas Back Institute Research Foundation, 6020 W. Parker Rd. #200, Plano, TX 75093, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kitzen J, Vercoulen TFG, Schotanus MGM, van Kuijk SMJ, Kort NP, van Rhijn LW, Willems PCPH. Long-Term Residual-Mobility and Adjacent Segment Disease After Total Lumbar Disc Replacement. Global Spine J 2021; 11:1032-1039. [PMID: 32677523 PMCID: PMC8351064 DOI: 10.1177/2192568220935813] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVES Total disc replacement (TDR) has been introduced in order to preserve segmental motion and thus reduce adjacent segment disease (ASD) as seen after spinal fusion. However, it is uncertain whether these presumed beneficial effects remain. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term incidence of ASD and residual-mobility in relation to clinical outcome. METHODS A total of 210 patients treated with lumbar TDR for degenerative disc disease were invited for follow-up. ASD was reported in case of severe degeneration in an adjacent disc at latest follow-up, or if an increase in disc degeneration was observed in these adjacent segments as compared to direct postoperative radiographs. Residual-mobility of the TDR was defined as a minimal rotation of 4.6° on flexion-extension radiographs. Patient-reported outcome measures were obtained. RESULTS Fifty-seven patients (27.1%) were lost to follow-up. In 32 patients (15.3%) a revision by spinal fusion had been performed. In 20 patients this revision had occurred ≥5 years after TDR and were included. Consequently, 141 patients were available for analysis (mean follow-up of 16.7 years). Residual-mobility was noted in 38.0%. No significant associations were observed between residual-mobility and the occurrence of ASD, or with clinical outcome. In addition, ASD and clinical outcome were not related either. CONCLUSIONS It appears that long-term preservation of motion after TDR is met for only a third of patients. However, residual-mobility is not associated with the occurrence of ASD, and both residual-mobility and ASD do not appear to be related to long-term clinical outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joep Kitzen
- Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands,Joep Kitzen, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | - Nanne P. Kort
- Zuyderland Medical Centre, Sittard-Geleen, Netherlands
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Costi JJ, Ledet EH, O'Connell GD. Spine biomechanical testing methodologies: The controversy of consensus vs scientific evidence. JOR Spine 2021; 4:e1138. [PMID: 33778410 PMCID: PMC7984003 DOI: 10.1002/jsp2.1138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/01/2020] [Revised: 12/04/2020] [Accepted: 12/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Biomechanical testing methodologies for the spine have developed over the past 50 years. During that time, there have been several paradigm shifts with respect to techniques. These techniques evolved by incorporating state-of-the-art engineering principles, in vivo measurements, anatomical structure-function relationships, and the scientific method. Multiple parametric studies have focused on the effects that the experimental technique has on outcomes. As a result, testing methodologies have evolved, but there are no standard testing protocols, which makes the comparison of findings between experiments difficult and conclusions about in vivo performance challenging. In 2019, the international spine research community was surveyed to determine the consensus on spine biomechanical testing and if the consensus opinion was consistent with the scientific evidence. More than 80 responses to the survey were received. The findings of this survey confirmed that while some methods have been commonly adopted, not all are consistent with the scientific evidence. This review summarizes the scientific literature, the current consensus, and the authors' recommendations on best practices based on the compendium of available evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John J. Costi
- Biomechanics and Implants Research Group, Medical Device Research Institute, College of Science and EngineeringFlinders UniversityAdelaideAustralia
| | - Eric H. Ledet
- Department of Biomedical EngineeringRensselaer Polytechnic InstituteTroyNew YorkUSA
- Research and Development ServiceStratton VA Medical CenterAlbanyNew YorkUSA
| | - Grace D. O'Connell
- Department of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of California‐BerkeleyBerkeleyCaliforniaUSA
- Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryUniversity of California‐San FranciscoSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Jacobs CAM, Siepe CJ, Ito K. Viscoelastic cervical total disc replacement devices: Design concepts. Spine J 2020; 20:1911-1924. [PMID: 32810609 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2020.08.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2020] [Revised: 08/12/2020] [Accepted: 08/12/2020] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Cervical disc replacement (CDR) is a motion-preserving surgical procedure for treating patients with degenerative disorders. Numerous reports of first generation CDR "ball-and-socket" articulating devices have shown satisfactory clinical results. As a result, CDR devices have been safely implemented in the surgeon's armamentarium on a global scale. However, only minor design improvements have been made over the last few years, as first generation CDRs devices were based on traditional synovial joint arthroplasty designs. As a consequence, these articulating designs have limited resemblance to the complex kinematic behavior of a natural disc. This has driven the development of deformable viscoelastic CDR devices to better mimic the biomechanical behavior of a natural disc. As a result, several viscoelastic CDR devices have been developed in recent years that vary in terms of materials, design and clinical outcomes. Since these viscoelastic CDR devices are fairly new, their weaknesses and strengths, which are related to their design characteristics, have not been well described. Therefore, this literature review discusses design related advantages and disadvantages of deformable viscoelastic CDR devices. As such, this paper can provide insight for surgeons and engineers on specific design characteristics of several viscoelastic devices and could potentially help to develop and design future implants. Eleven viscoelastic CDR devices were identified. An extensive database search on the devices' tradenames in Medline and PubMed was performed next. The devices were categorized based on common design characteristics to give an overview of both category and device specific complications and advantages. Overall, literature shows that most of these viscoelastic CDR devices can provide motion in all six degrees-of-freedom and have a variable center of rotation. Nevertheless, the viscoelastic materials used do not have an extensive history in orthopedics, so the long-term material behavior in vivo is still unknown. Although the viscoelastic devices have common benefits and risks, each specific design and category also has its own design related advantages and drawbacks that are described in this review. Altogether, viscoelastic total disc replacements seem to be a promising option for the future of cervical arthroplasty, but long-term clinical outcome is needed to confirm the advantages of mimicking the viscoelasticity of a natural disc.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Celien A M Jacobs
- Orthopaedic Biomechanics, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, De Rondom 70, 5612 AP Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
| | - Christoph J Siepe
- Schoen Clinic Munich Harlaching, Spine Center, Harlachinger Str. 51, D-81547 Munich, Germany; Spine Research Institute and Academic Teaching Hospital of the Paracelsus University Salzburg (PMU), Strubergasse 21, A-5020 Salzburg, Austria
| | - Keita Ito
- Orthopaedic Biomechanics, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, De Rondom 70, 5612 AP Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Vanaclocha-Saiz A, Atienza CM, Vanaclocha V, Belloch V, Santabarbara JM, Jordá-Gómez P, Vanaclocha L. ICR in human cadaveric specimens: An essential parameter to consider in a new lumbar disc prosthesis design. NORTH AMERICAN SPINE SOCIETY JOURNAL 2020; 2:100016. [PMID: 35141586 PMCID: PMC8820058 DOI: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2020.100016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2020] [Revised: 06/29/2020] [Accepted: 07/15/2020] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Biomechanical study in cadaveric specimens. BACKGROUND The commercially available lumbar disc prostheses do not reproduce the intact disc's Instantaneous centre of Rotation (ICR), thus inducing an overload on adjacent anatomical structures, promoting secondary degeneration. AIM To examine biomechanical testing of cadaveric lumbar spine specimens in order to evaluate and define the ICR of intact lumbar discs. MATERIAL AND METHODS Twelve cold preserved fresh human cadaveric lumbosacral spine specimens were subjected to computerized tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and biomechanical testing. Kinematic studies were performed to analyse range of movements in order to determine ICR. RESULTS Flexoextension and lateral bending tests showed a positive linear correlation between the angle rotated and the displacement of the ICR in different axes. DISCUSSION ICR has not been taken into account in any of the available literature regarding lumbar disc prosthesis. Considering our results, neither the actual ball-and-socket nor the withdrawn elastomeric nucleus models fit the biomechanics of the lumbar spine, which could at least in part explain the failure rates of the implants in terms of postoperative failed back syndrome (low back pain). It is reasonable to consider then that an implant should also adapt the equations of the movement of the intact ICR of the joint to the post-surgical ICR. CONCLUSIONS This is the first cadaveric study on the ICR of the human lumbar spine. We have shown that it is feasible to calculate and consider this parameter in order to design future prosthesis with improved clinical and biomechanical characteristics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Carlos M Atienza
- Instituto de Biomecánica (IBV) Universitat Politècnica de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
- Instituto de Biomecánica de Valencia-CIBER BBN, Grupo de Tecnología Sanitaria (GTS-IBV), Valencia, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Internal load-sharing in the human passive lumbar spine: Review of in vitro and finite element model studies. J Biomech 2020; 102:109441. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2019.109441] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2019] [Revised: 10/13/2019] [Accepted: 10/14/2019] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
|
10
|
Dharmajaya R, Sari DK, Ganie RA. A Comparison of the Quality of Sleep between Pre and Post-Surgery Cervical Herniated Nucleus Pulposus Patients Utilizing the Anterior Discectomy Method. Open Access Maced J Med Sci 2017; 5:948-954. [PMID: 29362625 PMCID: PMC5771301 DOI: 10.3889/oamjms.2017.209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2017] [Revised: 09/24/2017] [Accepted: 09/29/2017] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Herniated Nucleus Pulposus (HNP) is the prolapse of the intervertebral disk through a tear in the annulus fibrosus. This causes nerve root compression with clinical pain manifestation and affects the quality of sleep. AIM The aim of this study was find out the comparison in the quality of sleep between before (pre) and after (post) surgery cervical HNP patients. METHODS This study was a retrospective cohort study. Ninety patients were asked to complete the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) questionnaire. All data which has been computed were analysed with the McNemar test. RESULT The outcome reveals that from 90 patient`s cervical HNP, 81 (90%) were 40 years old age group and 66 (73.3%) of them were women. The result showed that 66 (73.3%) patients have a bad sleep quality before surgery. Surgery has increased the quality of sleep after surgery 66 (73.3%) patients had good sleep quality. There was a significant difference in the quality of sleep pre and post operation (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION There was a significant difference in the quality of sleep between pre and post operation cervical HNP patient utilising anterior discectomy methods.
Collapse
|
11
|
|
12
|
Abstract
PURPOSE The primary goal of this Policy Statement is to educate patients, physicians, medical providers, reviewers, adjustors, case managers, insurers, and all others involved or affected by insurance coverage decisions regarding lumbar disc replacement surgery. PROCEDURES This Policy Statement was developed by a panel of physicians selected by the Board of Directors of ISASS for their expertise and experience with lumbar TDR. The panel's recommendation was entirely based on the best evidence-based scientific research available regarding the safety and effectiveness of lumbar TDR.
Collapse
|
13
|
The current testing protocols for biomechanical evaluation of lumbar spinal implants in laboratory setting: a review of the literature. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2015; 2015:506181. [PMID: 25785272 PMCID: PMC4345069 DOI: 10.1155/2015/506181] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2014] [Accepted: 01/25/2015] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
In vitro biomechanical investigations have become a routinely employed technique to explore new lumbar instrumentation. One of the most important advantages of such investigations is the low risk present when compared to clinical trials. However, the best use of any experimental data can be made when standard testing protocols are adopted by investigators, thus allowing comparisons among studies. Experimental variables, such as the length of the specimen, operative level, type of loading (e.g., dynamic versus quasistatic), magnitude, and rate of load applied, are among the most common variables controlled during spinal biomechanical testing. Although important efforts have been made to standardize these protocols, high variability can be found in the current literature. The aim of this investigation was to conduct a systematic review of the literature to identify the current trends in the protocols reported for the evaluation of new lumbar spinal implants under laboratory setting.
Collapse
|
14
|
Nayak AN, Doarn MC, Gaskins RB, James CR, Cabezas AF, Castellvi AE, Santoni BG. Postero-lateral disc prosthesis combined with a unilateral facet replacement device maintains quantity and quality of motion at a single lumbar level. Int J Spine Surg 2014; 8:14444-1031. [PMID: 25694929 PMCID: PMC4325497 DOI: 10.14444/1031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Mechanically replacing one or more pain generating articulations in the functional spinal unit (FSU) may be a motion preservation alternative to arthrodesis at the affected level. Baseline biomechanical data elucidating the quantity and quality of motion in such arthroplasty constructs is non-existent. Purpose The purpose of the study was to quantify the motion-preserving effect of a posterior total disc replacement (PDR) combined with a unilateral facet replacement (FR) system at a single lumbar level (L4-L5). We hypothesized that reinforcement of the FSU with unilateral FR to replace the resected, native facet joint following PDR implantation would restore quality and quantity of motion and additionally not change biomechanics at the adjacent levels. Study Design In-vitro study using human cadaveric lumbar spines. Methods Six (n = 6) cadaveric lumbar spines (L1-S1) were evaluated using a pure-moment stability testing protocol (±7.5 Nm) in flexion-extension (F/E), lateral bending (LB) and axial rotation (AR). Each specimen was tested in: (1) intact; (2) unilateral FR; and (3) unilateral FR + PDR conditions. Index and adjacent level ROM (using hybrid protocol) were determined opto-electronically. Interpedicular travel (IPT) and instantaneous center of rotation (ICR) at the index level were radiographically determined for each condition. ROM, ICR, and IPT measurements were compared (repeated measures ANOVA) between the three conditions. Results Compared to the intact spine, no significant changes in F/E, LB or AR ROM were identified as a result of unilateral FR or unilateral FR + PDR. No significant changes in adjacent L3-L4 or L5-S1 ROM were identified in any loading mode. No significant differences in IPT were identified between the three test conditions in F/E, LB or AR at the L4-L5 level. The ICRs qualitatively were similar for the intact and unilateral FR conditions and appeared to follow placement (along the anterior-posterior (AP) direction) of the PDR in the disc space Conclusion Biomechanically, quantity and quality of motion are maintained with combined unilateral FR + PDR at a single lumbar spinal level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aniruddh N Nayak
- Phillip Spiegel Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, Foundation for Orthopaedic Research & Education, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Michael C Doarn
- Department of Orthopaedics & Sports Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Roger B Gaskins
- Department of Orthopaedics & Sports Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Chris R James
- Missouri Orthopaedic Institute, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA
| | - Andres F Cabezas
- Phillip Spiegel Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, Foundation for Orthopaedic Research & Education, Tampa, FL, USA
| | | | - Brandon G Santoni
- Phillip Spiegel Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, Foundation for Orthopaedic Research & Education, Tampa, FL, USA ; Department of Orthopaedics & Sports Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Siepe CJ, Heider F, Wiechert K, Hitzl W, Ishak B, Mayer MH. Mid- to long-term results of total lumbar disc replacement: a prospective analysis with 5- to 10-year follow-up. Spine J 2014; 14:1417-31. [PMID: 24448028 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.08.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2013] [Revised: 07/21/2013] [Accepted: 08/22/2013] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT The role of fusion of lumbar motion segments for the treatment of intractable low back pain (LBP) from degenerative disc disease (DDD) without deformities or instabilities remains controversially debated. Total lumbar disc replacement (TDR) has been used as an alternative in a highly selected patient cohort. However, the amount of long-term follow-up (FU) data on TDR is limited. In the United States, insurers have refused to reimburse surgeons for TDRs for fear of delayed complications, revisions, and unknown secondary costs, leading to a drastic decline in TDR numbers. PURPOSE To assess the mid- and long-term clinical efficacy as well as patient safety of TDR in terms of perioperative complication and reoperation rates. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING Prospective, single-center clinical investigation of TDR with ProDisc II (Synthes, Paoli, PA, USA) for the treatment of LBP from lumbar DDD that has proven unresponsive to conservative therapy. PATIENT SAMPLE Patients with a minimum of 5-year FU after TDR, performed for the treatment of intractable and predominant (≥80%) axial LBP resulting from DDD without any deformities or instabilities. OUTCOME MEASURES Visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and patient satisfaction rates (three-scale outcome rating); complication and reoperation rates as well as elapsed time until revision surgery; patient's professional activity/employment status. METHODS Clinical outcome scores were acquired within the framework of an ongoing prospective clinical trial. Patients were examined preoperatively, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively, annually from then onward. The data acquisition was performed by members of the clinic's spine unit including medical staff, research assistants, and research nurses who were not involved in the process of pre- or postoperative decision-making. RESULTS The initial cohort consisted of 201 patients; 181 patients were available for final FU, resembling a 90.0% FU rate after a mean FU of 7.4 years (range 5.0-10.8 years). The overall results revealed a highly significant improvement from baseline VAS and ODI levels at all postoperative FU stages (p<.0001). VAS scores demonstrated a slight (from VAS 2.6 to 3.3) but statistically significant deterioration from 48 months onward (p<.05). Patient satisfaction rates remained stable throughout the entire postoperative course, with 63.6% of patients reporting a highly satisfactory or a satisfactory (22.7%) outcome, whereas 13.7% of patients were not satisfied. The overall complication rate was 14.4% (N=26/181). The incidence of revision surgeries for general and/or device-related complications was 7.2% (N=13/181). Two-level TDRs demonstrated a significant improvement of VAS and ODI scores in comparison to baseline levels (p<.05). Nevertheless, the results were significantly inferior in comparison to one-level cases and were associated with higher complication (11.9% vs. 27.6%; p=.03) and inferior satisfaction rates (p<.003). CONCLUSIONS Despite the fact that the current data comprises the early experiences and learning curve associated with a new surgical technique, the results demonstrate satisfactory and maintained mid- to long-term clinical results after a mean FU of 7.4 years. Patient safety was proven with acceptable complication and reoperation rates. Fear of excessive late complications or reoperations following the primary TDR procedure cannot be substantiated with the present data. In carefully selected cases, TDR can be considered a viable treatment alternative to lumbar fusion for which spine communities around the world seem to have accepted mediocre clinical results as well as obvious and significant drawbacks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christoph J Siepe
- Schön Klinik Munich Harlaching, Spine Center, Academic Teaching Hospital of the Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg (AU), Harlachinger Str. 51, D-81547 Munich, Germany.
| | - Franziska Heider
- Schön Klinik Munich Harlaching, Spine Center, Academic Teaching Hospital of the Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg (AU), Harlachinger Str. 51, D-81547 Munich, Germany
| | - Karsten Wiechert
- Department of Spinal Surgery, Hessingpark Clinic, Hessingstrasse 17; D-86199 Augsburg, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Hitzl
- Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Biostatistics, Research Office, Strubergasse 21, 5020 Salzburg, Austria
| | - Basem Ishak
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Michael H Mayer
- Schön Klinik Munich Harlaching, Spine Center, Academic Teaching Hospital of the Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg (AU), Harlachinger Str. 51, D-81547 Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Bauman JA, Jaumard NV, Guarino BB, Weisshaar CL, Lipschutz DE, Welch WC, Winkelstein BA. Facet joint contact pressure is not significantly affected by ProDisc cervical disc arthroplasty in sagittal bending: a single-level cadaveric study. Spine J 2012; 12:949-59. [PMID: 22975463 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.08.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2011] [Revised: 06/07/2012] [Accepted: 08/07/2012] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT Total disc arthroplasty is a motion-preserving spinal procedure that has been investigated for its impact on spinal motions and adjacent-level degeneration. However, the effects of disc arthroplasty on facet joint biomechanics remain undefined despite the critical role of these posterior elements on guiding and limiting spinal motion. PURPOSE The goal was to measure the pressure in the facet joint in cadaveric human cervical spines subjected to sagittal bending before and after implantation of the ProDisc-C (Synthes Spine Company, L.P, West Chester, PA, USA). STUDY DESIGN A biomechanical study was performed using cadaveric human cervical spines during sagittal bending in the intact and implanted conditions. METHODS Seven C2-T1 osteoligamentous cadaveric cervical spines were instrumented with a transducer to measure the C5-C6 facet pressure profiles during physiological sagittal bending, before and after implantation of a ProDisc-C at that level. Rotations of the index segment and global cervical spine were also quantified. RESULTS The mean C5-C6 range of motion significantly increased (p=.009) from 9.6°±5.1° in the intact condition to 16.2°±3.6° after implantation. However, despite such changes in rotation, there was no significant difference in the facet contact pressure during extension between the intact (64±30 kPa) and implanted (44±55 kPa) conditions. Similarly, there was no difference in facet pressure developed during flexion. CONCLUSIONS Although implantation of a ProDisc-C arthroplasty device at the C5-C6 level increases angular rotations, it does not significantly alter the local facet pressure at the index level in flexion or extension. Using a technique that preserves the capsular ligament, this study provides the first direct measurement of cervical facet pressure in a disc arthroplasty condition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joel A Bauman
- Department of Neurosurgery, 3 Silverstein Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce St., Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Jaumard NV, Welch WC, Winkelstein BA. Spinal facet joint biomechanics and mechanotransduction in normal, injury and degenerative conditions. J Biomech Eng 2011; 133:071010. [PMID: 21823749 DOI: 10.1115/1.4004493] [Citation(s) in RCA: 200] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
The facet joint is a crucial anatomic region of the spine owing to its biomechanical role in facilitating articulation of the vertebrae of the spinal column. It is a diarthrodial joint with opposing articular cartilage surfaces that provide a low friction environment and a ligamentous capsule that encloses the joint space. Together with the disc, the bilateral facet joints transfer loads and guide and constrain motions in the spine due to their geometry and mechanical function. Although a great deal of research has focused on defining the biomechanics of the spine and the form and function of the disc, the facet joint has only recently become the focus of experimental, computational and clinical studies. This mechanical behavior ensures the normal health and function of the spine during physiologic loading but can also lead to its dysfunction when the tissues of the facet joint are altered either by injury, degeneration or as a result of surgical modification of the spine. The anatomical, biomechanical and physiological characteristics of the facet joints in the cervical and lumbar spines have become the focus of increased attention recently with the advent of surgical procedures of the spine, such as disc repair and replacement, which may impact facet responses. Accordingly, this review summarizes the relevant anatomy and biomechanics of the facet joint and the individual tissues that comprise it. In order to better understand the physiological implications of tissue loading in all conditions, a review of mechanotransduction pathways in the cartilage, ligament and bone is also presented ranging from the tissue-level scale to cellular modifications. With this context, experimental studies are summarized as they relate to the most common modifications that alter the biomechanics and health of the spine-injury and degeneration. In addition, many computational and finite element models have been developed that enable more-detailed and specific investigations of the facet joint and its tissues than are provided by experimental approaches and also that expand their utility for the field of biomechanics. These are also reviewed to provide a more complete summary of the current knowledge of facet joint mechanics. Overall, the goal of this review is to present a comprehensive review of the breadth and depth of knowledge regarding the mechanical and adaptive responses of the facet joint and its tissues across a variety of relevant size scales.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolas V Jaumard
- Dept. of Neurosurgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Glenn JS, Yaker J, Guyer RD, Ohnmeiss DD. Anterior discectomy and total disc replacement for three patients with multiple recurrent lumbar disc herniations. Spine J 2011; 11:e1-6. [PMID: 21907631 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2011.07.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2010] [Revised: 06/01/2011] [Accepted: 07/29/2011] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT Although results of primary discectomy are generally excellent with relief of leg pain, recurrent lumbar disc herniation is relatively common ranging from 5% to 25%. Patients with recurrent herniation may undergo revision surgery; however, this carries with it increased risks and lower success rates. Many surgeons will advocate a fusion in addition to repeat discectomy after the third recurrent herniated disc. With the approval of lumbar total disc arthroplasty, there now exists another option for the patient with three or more recurrent disc herniations to preserve motion, theoretically decrease the rate of adjacent-level disease, and ameliorate the patient's symptoms. PURPOSE The purpose of this case report is to describe our experience using total disc replacement (TDR) in three patients after prior partial hemilaminectomy and discectomy for the treatment of a third and fourth recurrent lumbar disc herniation. STUDY DESIGN This article is a report of three cases from a spine specialty center describing an alternative surgical technique for patients with multiple recurrent lumbar disc herniation. METHODS Comprehensive chart review of three patients with recurrent lumbar herniation who underwent TDR. RESULTS Anterior discectomy and TDR were undertaken, and at most recent follow-up (8-12 months), all patients had improvement of their visual analog scale and Oswestry Disability Index. No patient had postoperative complications or reoperation. CONCLUSIONS Recurrent disc herniation is a relatively common problem that may be difficult to treat. Traditionally, a patient presenting with three or more recurrent disc herniation may likely have undergone revision discectomy with fusion. The current case report suggests that TDR may be an alternative option in select patients.
Collapse
|