Acromioclavicular Joint Arthroscopy and Debridement

The medium-term results of acromioclavicular joint arthroscopy with chondral and meniscal debridement

PURPOSE

Surgical management of a young patient with a stable but painful acromioclavicular (AC) joint but normal imagining is a challenging problem. A standard arthroscopic excision of distal clavicle seems too aggressive. An alternative procedure is arthroscopic debridement of the joint, particularly the often torn meniscus, and chondroplasty. This study demonstrates in younger patients the medium-term result of arthroscopic debridement of a painful AC joint.

METHODS

Fifty-three young adult patients with a stable but painful AC joint, and virtually normal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan, had arthroscopic debridement of the AC joint. Follow-up was with questionnaire and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder Score (ASES).

RESULTS

Mean age was 29 years (18-39), 41 male, 31 dominant arm. Twenty-two patients demonstrated additional shoulder pathology. Two patients had a later distal clavicle excision. Five patients had later surgery to other areas of the shoulder but had an asymptomatic AC joint. Thirty-eight patients completed the ASES questionnaire at mean 44 months (24-86) post-operation. The mean ASES score was 82.8 (52-100). There was no association between ASES score and AC joint disease severity found at operation ( p = 0.25). Seven patients had ongoing shoulder symptoms, although none were severe enough to warrant any treatment.

CONCLUSION

In this young group of patients with arthroscopic AC joint debridement, most had good relief of the AC joint related symptoms. This is a worthwhile procedure in the young patient, with quick recovery, and does not preclude further AC joint surgery later.

Biomechanical analysis of distal clavicle excision with acromioclavicular joint reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Acromioclavicular (AC) joint separation is a common injury, usually affecting young adults. Controversy exists regarding whether to excise the distal clavicle when surgical intervention is required.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the biomechanical strength of AC and coracoclavicular (CC) ligament reconstruction with and without concurrent distal clavicle excision.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Nine matched pairs of cadaver shoulders were used. All shoulders were tested with intact CC and AC ligaments, and the ligaments were sectioned. For 1 shoulder in each pair, a 7-mm distal clavicle excision was performed. The contralateral distal clavicle was left intact. Single-tunnel CC ligament reconstruction was performed, and excess graft length was extended and secured across the AC joint to reconstruct the superior AC joint ligaments in all specimens. Specimens were then potted and cyclically loaded for 500 cycles in the anterior-posterior and superior-inferior planes using an MTS Minibionix load frame to evaluate displacement across the AC joint.

RESULTS

Regarding the clavicle-intact reconstructed versus the intact state, there was significantly greater AC joint translation in the reconstructed state in the anterior-posterior (20.2 ± 7.0 mm vs 6.0 ± 1.5 mm; P < .001) and superior-inferior directions (12.3 ± 3.3 mm vs 4.2 ± 1.2 mm; P < .001). In the clavicle-excised reconstructed versus the intact state, there was also significantly greater translation in the reconstructed state in the anterior-posterior (21.7 ± 5.1 mm vs 8.9 ± 4.3 mm; P < .001) and superior-inferior directions (12.3 ± 6.1 mm vs 5.8 ± 3.1 mm; P < .001). When the difference in translation between the reconstructed and intact groups in the clavicle-intact versus the clavicle-excised group was compared, no statistically significant difference was noted in anterior-posterior (14.2 ± 7.8 mm vs 12.8 ± 5.0 mm; P = .67) or superior-inferior translation (8.1 ± 2.9 mm vs 6.6 ± 3.9 mm; P = .39).

CONCLUSION

Excision of the distal clavicle did not have a significant effect on anterior-posterior or superior-inferior motion at the AC joint following single-tunnel CC and AC ligament reconstruction.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The study suggests that excision of the distal clavicle in this procedure is not associated with increased anterior-posterior or superior-inferior instability in this model.

The long term effect of an intra-articular injection of corticosteroids in the acromioclavicular joint

BACKGROUND

A prospective study was established to assess the effect of an intra-articular injection of corticosteroid and local anaesthetic into the acromioclavicular (AC) joint.

METHODS

Fifty-eight patients with isolated AC joint symptoms were included. Clinical tests were repeated immediately following the injection, as well as at 1-month follow-up. If symptoms failed to improve at this time, arthroscopic surgery was offered. All other patients were dismissed from standard care and contacted for this study. Both American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) and University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) scores were obtained at final follow-up.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients had improved sufficiently. Between the 1 month and average final follow-up of 42 months, 1 patient had arthroscopic resection of the distal clavicle. Four of the 15 patients reported occasional mild pain. Average visual analogue scale (VAS) score for pain was 0.5 (0-3). Average ASES score was 94.1 (70-100) and average UCLA score was 33.9 (28-35).

DISCUSSION

Pain relief achieved with an injection into the AC joint has both a diagnostic and therapeutic value. The decrease of pain with clinical testing affirms the correct position of the injection. Only a minority of patients has sufficient pain relief from the injection at 1 month follow-up; however, this is sustained at the longer-term follow-up in the patients that have a positive reaction.

CONCLUSION

The diagnostic value of the injection of a local anaesthetic in the AC joint is immediate. Only 28% have a clear positive result at 1 month; but, this result is sustained at long-term follow-up. There were no complications.